HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 Dec 02 - Board of Appeals Decision - Petition #4486i
� „ .
; �G„�l�i�fti�c�l� �'�-Gt
�
�
' •YA
�� �
„�� , ``�� TOWN OF YARMOUTH
�� � ,~��,� � BOARD OF APPEALS
� .�.. _:-�'��; DECISION
`�';'',,�, ��.:�.
,,,,`�.._.=`"`"',
' FTLED WITH TOWN CLERK: December 2,2013
PETITION NO: #4486
HEARING DATE: November 14,2013
PETITIONER: Sandbar Management,Inc.,
j pWNERS: Sandbar Holdings LLC and Mid-Cape 28 Mall,Inc.
PROPERTY: 512 & 518&532 (portion)Route 28,West Yarmouth,MA
Map&Parcel: 0031.82,83&85; Zoning District: B2&HMOD1
Certificate#: 199116&C217-83,C217-85,C217-87 and C217-90
Land Court Lot& Plan: Lot 44-Plan#26266-F
Lot 43-Plan#26266-F
MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING: Steven DeYoung, Chairman,Sean Igoe,Debra �
Martin,Bryant Palmer, and Chuck Hart
Notice of the hearing has been given by sending notice thereof to the Petitioner and all those owners
of property as required by law, and to the public by posting notice of the hearing and publishing in
The Register,the hearing opened and held on the date stated above.
The Petitioner is Sandbar Management,Inc. The Petitioner has previously obtained relief from the
Board of Appeals in Petition Nos.4420 and 4368 to operate the Cape Cod Inflatable Park at 51$and
512 Route 28,West Yarmouth. The Petitioner now seeks permission to reconfigure and expand the
Inflatable Park. As discussed with the Building Commissioner at Site Plan Review,the Applicant is
seeking 1)to further amend Special Permit#4420 and#4368 and 2)a new Special Permit to
reconfigure the Inflatable Park. The Applicant additionally requests an amendment to Condition 13
in Case#4368(as amended by Case#4420). The proposal will increase reaz setbacks,relocate the
water park portion of the facility behind the Wings building on the adjacent property(which will be
created as a new lot to be combined with the existing Inflatable Park property),provide additional
buffering,and result in more efficient opera.tions. Specifically,approximately one quarter of the
back section of the e�sting Inflatable Park will be removed from within the fenced area and will
instead be repositioned easterly onto the to-be-separated back portion of the adjacent land at 532
Route 28. The three parcels are shown as Parcels 82-C, 83,and 85 (rear)on Assessor's Map 31 and
are lacated in the B2 and HMOD1 Zoning Districts.
1
The Petitioner was well represented by Attorney Andrew Singer together with Mr.Joseph Marrama
principal owner and operator of the facility,and Mr.Kieran Healy,Engineer for the Petitioner. Mary
Collins and George Cannon spoke with concerns about the proposal. Correspondence was received
from Geneva Smithlin with concerns about the proposal.
The Board's Decision in Case#4420 contains a condition that the Board review and assure
compliance with the landscape conditions within one year. T'he Petitioner requested this review and
the Board conducted such review as part of this proposal. The Board found unanimously that there
has been compliance with the landscape conditions and that this condition has been satisfied.
A lengthy discussion took place regarding prior questions about noise emanating from the blowers at
the Inflatable Park. The Petitioner spent this past summer analyzing the business operation,testing
what works and doesn't work,meeting with several neighbors, and proposing solutions to
mitigate blower noise. There was also a posted on-site meeting with Board members and neighbors
at the Property and at neighboring properties to review new steps being proposed for sound
mitigation. The key components of the new sound mitigation proposal are two-fold--bury the
blowers for a11 of the water park rides plus the four large air park rides along the east side of the
middle section of the Inflatable Park and add sand berms around the northerly and easterly
perimeters of the Inflatable Park. As was demonstrated during the on-site visit,burying these
blowers and installing 15-ft. sand berm buffers adjacent to the Inflatabie Park fence dramatically
reduces and eliminates the sound off site. Separating these sand berm buffers from the
respective property lines will be additiona140 ft:wide natural vegetated buffers.
The proposal includes additional emergency access via a gate into the relocated water park portion of
the facility and sealed,inflatable sitting cabanas in this area for customer use. Along the south side
of the relocated water park portion of the facility,there will be a three-foot high berm with a
fence on top plus arbor vitae trees in front on the berm. This portion of fence will match the
existing fence along Route 28. The remainder of the fence along the east and north sides of the
Inflata.ble Pazk will be stockade to match the existing fence. There will be no changes in the front
and middle portions of the Inflatable Park or to the previously-permitted landscaping,fencing,and
screening along Route 28. The hours of opera.tion are not changing. When open(weather
dependent),the water park rides will close by 6:00 p.m., and the air park rides will close by 10:00
p.m. There will be no change in the maximum number of restaurant seats(100). However,the main
gift shop will be relocated within the current dining area inside the building,and the restaurant
seating will all be located outside in the proposed seating area in the"L"configuration and along the
exterior of the building as shown.
After further finding that the proposa.l will abate new and any existing blower noise and will not be
substantially more detrimental or more nonconforming to the neighborhaod,Zoning District or Town
than the existing conditions,that it will not cause or contribute to any undue nuisance,hazard or
congestion,that there will be no substantial harm to the established or future character of the
neighborhood or Town,and that strict enforcement of the current Zoning By-Law will result in
undue hardship to the Property or the owner,a motion was made by Mrs.Martin, seconded by Mr.
Palmer,and voted 5-0 in favor,to grant 1)a Modification as requested to Special Permit#4420 and
#4368 and 2)a new Special Permit as requested,to reconfigure and expand the Inflatable Park as
shown on the submitted plans and also to grant 3)a Modification to Condition 13 in Case#4368 (as
2
amended by Case#4420)as specified below,all of the above consistent with and as prayed for by
the petition on the following conditions:
� 1. The Petitioner shall schedule a review by this Board no later than June 26,2014,to
review and assure compliance with the blower sound mitigation measures;
;
2. Blowers for all of the water park rides plus the four large air park rides along the
east side of the middle section of the Inflatable Park sha11 be buried;
3. 15-ft. sand berm buffers shall be installed along the northerly and easterly fence of
the Inflatable Park;
4. Condition 13 in Petition#4368(as amended by Case#4420)shall be deleted and
replaced as follows: "This grant of relief is exclusive and limited to this Applicant,
Sandbar Management,Inc.,and any affiliated entity in which Sandbar Management,
� Inc. or its principals are majority owners. If any transfer of ownership of the business
' or park operation to an unaffiliated third party should occur, further review by this
? Board will be required to determine if the relief shall stay in effect;'and
; 5. The zoning relief granted herein shall not affect the existing and future operations and
redevelopment of the remainder of 532 Route 28 so long as the emergency gate
access easement is maintained.
;
,
�
' No permit shalt issue until 20 days from the filiug of this decision with the Town Clerk. This
decision must be recorded at the Registry of Deeds and a copy forwarded to the Board of
Appeals. Appeals from this deeision shall be made pursuant to MGL c40A section 17 and must
be filed within 20 days after filing of this noticeJdecision with the Town Clerk. Unless otherwise
provided herein, the Special Permit shall lapse if a substantial use thereof has not begun within
24 months. (See byl�w,MGL c40A §9)
I
Steven DeYoung,Chairman
3