Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014 Oct - 2015 Feb - EMails, Notes, Info i i � vonHone, Amy f I From: vonHone, Amy � Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 3:15 PM � To: 'Ron Cadillac' y Subject: RE: 46 Doherty � � i Bruce and I are ok with the latest 8.5" x 11" sketch. If you can label the foundation as slab and rename the chambers to ARC 36 LP and show the correct number of units/configuration, we will accept this as our"record �' copy" showing the conventional system. Also, I do not have a floor plan yet—we should probably take a look at that to make sure we agree that the new layout is a true 4 bedroom. � i Thanks, Amy i i Amy L.von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. ' Assistant Health Director Yarmouth Health Department From: Ron Cadillac fmailto:ronCa�rjcadillac.com] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 1:15 PM To: vonHone, Amy Subject: Re: 46 Doherry Amy, ` You are correct. We need to use ARC 36 LP (8" DEEP) instead (26 units) with top units =7.17, �' which would fit. i Thanks, Ron ' From: "vonHone, Amy" <AVonHoneCcDyarmouth.ma.us> : To: 'Ron Cadillac' <ronCa�ricadillac.com> Sent: Friday, February 6, 2015 9:07 AM Subject: RE: 46 Doherty Would the leach breakout still be under the slab elevation to meet the setback requirement? (Or, does that not matter because the General Approval letter states you only need to show that you have the required square footage of a conventional system?) Amy L.von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Assistant Health Director Yarmouth Health Department From: Ron Cadillac fmailto:ronCcaricadillac.com] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 8:48 AM To: vonHone, Amy Subject:46 Doherty i 1 1 If ! i �� ; ��� � vonHone, Amy From: Ron Cadiliac<ron@rjcadillac.com> ' Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 1:15 PM To: vonHone, Amy ` Subject: Re: 46 Doherty � � Amy, ; You are correct. We need to use ARC 36 LP (8" DEEP) instead (26 units) with top units =7.17, which would fit. Thanks, Ron � From: "vonHone, Amy" <AVonHoneCa�yarmouth.ma.us> To: 'Ron Cadillac' <ronCa�rjcadillac.com> , Sent: Friday, February 6, 2015 9:07 AM , Subject: RE: 46 Doherty Would the leach breakout still be under the slab elevation to meet the setback requirement? (Or, does that not ' matter because the General Approval letter states you only need to show that you have the required square footage of a conventional system?) Amy L.von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Assistant Health Director Yarmouth Health Department From: Ron Cadillac fmailto:ronCc�ricadillac.coml Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 8:48 AM To: vonHone, Amy Subject: 46 Doherty Hi, Attached is 20 scale showing leaching primary & secondary divided front and rear yards. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks. Ron II � 1 3 � vonHone, Amy From: vonHone, Amy Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 4:11 PM To: 'Ron Cadillac' Subject: RE: 46 Doherty Lane-Order of Conditions, revised plan Hi Ron- Bruce and I reviewed the plan and we are fine with the swale between the leach field and the wall. The only change is adding a clarification on the size of each chamber in the tank/pump chamber i.e. 1500 ga1/500 gal. I spoke with Kerry about the drainage issue—she is looking for some assurance from an engineer who would be responsible for drainage issues/calculations that there will not be any major issues with runoff from the property onto abutting properties and the roads. Can Steve agree/calculate that the 2' swale will handle the majority of any runoff from a typical storm event? Bruce and I are reviewing the plan from a septic standpoint and not from a drainage issue potentially to the abutters and the abutting roads. Amy Amy L.von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Assistant Health Director Yarmouth Health Department From: Ron Cadillac [mailto:ronCa�rjcadillac.com] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 12:26 PM To: vonHone,Amy; Steve Haas; Muldoon, Kerry Subject: Fw: 46 Doherly Lane- Order of Conditions, revised plan Amy, Steve Haas asked me to get yours and Bruce's input on this plan, which I dropped off last week. Conservation approved plan subject to Steve Haas stamping for run off--ConCom does not want run off going to abutters as our lot is being built up to meet Flood Regs. I have added a swale inside of the top of the wall which runs out to the street which is something we do not normally do. Normally for Title 5 we use a wall or a swale not both. Kerry says we have to meet storm water standards. Do you have any suggestions? Can come in if you want. With new flood Maps and new insurance rates we will be seeing more jobs like this. Thanks, Ron Cadillac, pls, rs ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "Muldoon, Kerry" <kmuldoon@yarmouth.ma.us> To: 'Ron Cadillac' <ron _rjcadillac.com>; "'sahaas@comcast.net"' <sahaas _comcast.neb 1 � --- _ - ___-- _. _ a -- _ - __ __ _ __ ___ _ _ ____ _----- '7"� /%�rr� :�� _ rr� � l�� u � �� � ♦ j v i � .. . � ��i � � .. . . � . . � ��. .-, : �� � � �"� -,o � � � a �� � � � ,� � � � ,� � -� 4 � � � j �- � y �C+ � --s' �� � �� S � 7 q�' �-" � �' `� �� -.� `^ �� I � � �, � � � r � . � �r^' 1 �� � � � � � � � ..� '�.,'�.. � � ���� - `� V � � � W vonHone, Amy From: Ron Cadillac<ron@rjcadillac.com> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 3:57 PM To: vonHone, Amy Subject: Re: 46 Doherty � Great. Thanks. We are probably going to come in with 7" higher, plus or minus. 3" not a problem! Ron On Monday, October 6, 2014 3:21 PM, "vonHone, Amy" <AVonHoneCc�yarmouth.ma.us>wrote: Ron- I talked with Bruce and we agree that if the top of the leach is below the elevation of the slab floor top, you will ' meet the setback requirements, however, we would both feel much more comfortable if you could get at least a : 3" separation versus the 0.05' separation you are proposing now. We are open to suggestions and more information. � Amy Amy L.von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Assistant Health Director Yarmouth Health Department From: Ron Cadillac fmailto:rcadillac@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 3:38 PM To: vonHone, Amy Subject: Fw: 46 Doherty On Friday, October 3, 2014 3:36 PM, Ron Cadillac<ron rjcadillac.com>wrote: Hi, I think solution to my problem lies in flood zone construction. See attached. Per flood regs lowest floor must be at grade outside or slightly above which = slab. Top of my drip tubes=6.55 , if I propose slab elev of 6.6 or 6.7 I submit I have a viable slab under title 5 which gives us 10' more for house footprint. Let me know if you think my logic sound. Thanks. Ron Cadillac rs i �� I ��� � �� 1��� � vonHone, Amy From: Ron Cadillac<ron@rjcadillac.com> � Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 3:37 PM To: vonHone, Amy Subject: 46 Doherty � Hi, I think solution to my problem lies in flood zone construction. See attached. Per flood regs lowest floor must be at grade outside or slightly above which = slab. Top of my drip tubes=6.55 , if I propose slab elev of 6.6 or 6.7 I submit I have a viable slab under title 5 which gives us 10' more for house footprint. Let me know if you think my logic sound. Thanks. Ron Cadillac rs i � i i (including crawlspaces) are permitted if used only for parking of vehicles, building access, and stora.ge.Figure 1 illustrates a typical crawlspace foundation wall and a typical framed wall surrounding an enclosed area. ' If enclosure walls are not designed with openings to relieve the Areas of shallow fiood- pressure of standing or slow moving waxer against them(called �ng may be shown as AO hydrosta.tic loads), the walls can be damaged or fail during a ��on FIRMs.Rather flood. If the wa.11s are "load bearing"walls that support the el- than BFEs,AO zones have "Hood depths"that range evated building, failure of the walls may result in damage to, from 1 to 3 feet.In these or collapse of, the building.To.�address this concern, the NFIP zones,aA NFIP require- . regulations require that enclosure walls contain openings that ments related to BFEs will allow for the automa.tic entry and exit of floodwaters.These aPP�Y,including elevaUon of openings allow floodwaters to reach equa.l levels on both sides �e��est floOr to or above of the walls,thereby lessening the potential for damage caused the designated flood depth and requirements for encio- by a difference in hydrostatic loads on opposite sides of the �ures with flood openings wa11s. In A zones, the requirement for flood openings applies that are located so that to all enclosed areas below new elevated buildings and below floodwaters wiil flow in and substantially improved buildings. o�• This Technical Bulletin explains the NFIP requirements for flood openings and provides guidance for prescriptive (non-engineered) openings and engineered openings. Non-engi � neered openings are used to meet the NFIP's prescriptive requirement of 1 squa.re inch of net open area for every square foot of enclosed area.As an alternative,engineered openings that ; ha.ve chara.cteristies that differ from non-engineered openings ma.p be used provided they are � designed and certified by a registered design professional as meeting certain performance i characteristics described in this Technical Bulletin. i � I I JoistlTruss Framed wall around enc�osure Solid perimeter .�.'9� �CrawlsPave (CMU or�ured �a;�a' � concrete) ��� Flood opening No more than . Interior 9l�e No more than ` 1 ioot 'i':a`•": 1 foot Interiorgrade '•4a.9' ':.q•,,...•,:r ,.,p•.,.... Exterfor grade :• •.�:' � �. t'-•:•; �y�� Exterior grade "� .•St��a}� 'ww 7l��� i b11��C�flg COdA Fig�ue 1. Tpph�i enclosures wiitt fiood opeMngs 2 TECNNICAL BULLETIN 1-AU4UST 2008 1 � I 1 DIAGRAM 3 DIAQRAM 4 All�Iitaevel buildings that are slabon�grade,either All spiit-levei buGdiags(ather than slabon�rade),either detached or row type�e.g.,townhouses);with a without detached m row type(e.g.,townhouses);with or without attached garege. attached garage. DIstM�ulshing Feature—The bottom floor(excluding garage)is at Olstinguishing Feature—The bottom floor(bas�nerrt or or above ground level(grade)on at least 1 side.* underground garage)is below ground level(grade)on all sides.* C2.8 p I � 1 ' � C2.b C2.a � � C2.b HIGHER � ' FLOOR3 HIGHER � NEXT HIGHER G�� FLOORS C3RADE gOTTOM F�� NEXT HICiHER BOTTOM FLOOR FLppR LOOR t R 4 „�2ty� 'e� } �}r � i5�k�; .."� � �#�tic'�s_x'' K r : 1,f+��* � � �� s.� �rr 3.u++t�+kJ�rar.�a�e �' . '�V"o:+ �} �..,,�,p ,9J''r tg"` � ,,,�w��'k a s 7,y�,v �d.. � i ,� � �. � ��.ra� �:;. tm`"'f'f $� .r:M� ^. `�F �c. 1 t '9 � T � rt�ti.. 4L.�'����t�a.''r�{:4:^.�t�L.��� `�v'�tth�;'3�t�x'f w.� _ �' W rM �2....._. . .��7 �s: � �VZ.f h �Y R ��` C2.f-11 •'ews6ng grade�..� . .. . _. .... _ `�8� '�y��e� _ _�, __ ... .., ... : DIAGRAM 5 DIAQRAM 6 All butldings e�evated on piero,posts,piles,columns, All buildinga�evated on piers,poata,piles,calumns, a parallel shear walls.No obetructbns below the or parallel shear walls with fWl or Partial encbsuro elevated floor. below the elevated floor. Dlstingulshing Featuro—For ail zones,the area below the Dlatinguishing Feature—For all zones,the area below the elevated floor is open,with no obstruction to ilow of floodwaters elevated tloor is enclosed,either partially or fully. In A Zones, (open lattice work andJor insect screening is permissible). the partialiy or fully enclosed area helow the elevated floor is with or without openings•*present in the walls of the enctosure. Indicate information about enclosure size and openings in Sectlon C2.b A—Property Information. � NEXT HIpHER � j NEXT HIGHER � � FLOOR + i F��� � C2.a C2.a C2.b ELEVATEO ELEVATED FLOOR ��R A8.8-•'C GRADE r,RqpE eie w� endostae size& ���. .�� �;�� oPenin9s.if a�y. = ' ,.: .'__ • � ° *t ' ' :> s {. C2.f--h ��eeherrrut�a by . .. . . . .... � C2.�h f -..,. - .. . . :� .'�:` - exiaNn9�) CZ.0 (Fw V zones oMY1 h exisBng grade) . C2•C (For V za�es on{Yl s A floor that Is below ground level(grade)on all sides Is considered a basement even Ii the floor Is used for Ifving purposes,or as an office, garage,workshop,etC. **An"opening"is a permanent opening that allows for ths free passage of water automatically in both directions without human intervention. Under the NFlP,a minimum of 2 openings is required for enclosures or crawlspaces.The openings shall provide a total net area oi not less than 1 square inch for every square foot of area enclosed,excluding any bars,louvers,or other covers of the openin�Alternatively,an Individual Engineered Flood Openings CertificaUon or an Evaluation Report issued by the Intemational Cade Council Evaluation Service(ICC ES)must be submitted to document that the design of the openings wiil al►ow for the automatic equalization of hydrostatic flood torces on exterior walis.A window,a door,or a garage door is not considered an opening;openings may be installed in doors.Openings shall be on at least 2 sides of the enciosed area.If a building has more than 1 enclosed area,each area must have openings to aliow floodwater to directly I enter.7he bottom of the openings must be no higher than 1.0 foot above the higher of the extedor or interior grade or floor immediately below ; the opening.For more guidance on openings,see NFlP Technicai Bulletln 1. j i NFlP Elevation Certificate Insiructions—Page 8 � i --- _--- __ __ _ _ � , i � I us.DEPARTMENT OF HOMEtAND SECURITY ELEVATI�N CERTIFICATE oM6 No. 1660-0008 � FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY i Naticaal Fbod Luwance Pragram IMPORTANT:Foliow the instructions on pages 1-9. Expiration Dete:Juty 31.2015 SECTiON A-PROPERTY INFORMAflON I�tlNSURANCE#�";4�iY t� A1. Building Owner's Name Ppqqi 1+Nunber; � A2. Building Street Address(including Apt.,Unit,Suite,and/or Bldg.No.y or B0.Route and 8ox No. Gam�eyMAlCh�ir: � � City State ZIP Code A3. Properry DescHption(l.ot and Block Numbers,T�Parcel Number,Legal Description,etc.) I A4. Buildtng Use(e.g.,Residential,Non-Residential,Addition,Accessory,etc.) A5. LaUtude/Longftude:Lat. Long. Horizontal Datum: ❑NAD 1927 ❑NAD 1983 A6. Attach at least 2 photographs of the buiiding if the Certificate is being used to obtain ftood insurance. A7. Building Diagram Number A8. For a building with a crawlspace or enclosure(s): A9,for a building with an attached garage: a) Square footage of crawispace or enciosure(s) sq ft a) 5quare footage of attached garage sq ft b) Number of permanent flood openings in the crawispace b) Number of permanent flood openings in the attached garage or enciosure(s)within 1.0 foot above adjacent grade within 1.0 foot abwe a�acent grade c) Total net area of flood openings in A8.b sq in c) Total net area of AoaJ openings in A9.b sq in d) Engineered flood openings? ❑Yes ❑No d) Engineered flood openings? ❑Yes ❑No SECTION B-FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP(FlRM) INFORMATION 81. NFlP Community Name&Comm�nity Number B2.County Name 63.Sta#e 84. Map/Panel Number 85.Suffix B6.FlRM index Date 67.FlRM Panei Effective/ 68.Flood Zaie(s) B9.Base Flood Elevatlan(s)(2one Revlsed Date A0,use base t9ood depth) B10.Indicate the source of the Base Flood Elevation(BFE7 data or base flood depth entered in Item 89: ❑FIS Profile ❑FlRM ❑Community Determined ❑Other/Source: 811.Indicate elevation datum used for BFE in Item 89: ❑NGVD 1929 ❑NAVD 1998 ❑Other/Source: 812.Is the building located in a Coastal Barrier Resources System(CBRS)area or Otherwise Protected Area(OPA)? ❑Yes ❑No DesignaUon Date: / / ❑CBRS ❑OPA ' SECTION C-BUILDINQ ELEVATION INFORMATION(SURVEY REQUIRED) C1. Buiiding elevations are based on: ❑Construction Drawings* ❑Building Under Construction* ❑Fnished Construction ' *A new Elevation Certificate will be required when construction of the building is compiete. C2. Elevations-Zones A1-A30,AE,AH,A(with BFE),VE,U1-V30,V(with BFE),AR,AR/A,AR/AE,AR/A1-A30,AR/AH,AR/A0.Complete Items C2.a-h below according to the buildi�g diagram specified in Item A7.in Puerto Rico only,errter meters. Benchmark Utilized: Vertical Datum: Indicate elevation datum used for the elevations in items a)through h)below. ❑NGVD 1929 ❑NAVD 1988 ❑Other/Source: Datum used for building elevations must be the same as that used for the BFE. Check the measurement used. a) Top of bottom floor(fncluding baseme�t,crawispace,or enclosure floor) . ❑feet ❑meters b) Top of the next higher floor . ❑feet ❑meters c) Bottom of the lowest horizorrtal structurai member(V Zones onry} , ❑feet ❑meters d) Attached garage(top of slab) . ❑feet ❑meters e) Lowesi elevation of machinery or equipment servicing the building . ❑feet ❑meters (Descrtbe rype oi equlpment and IocaUon In Comments) fl Lowest adjacent(finished)grade next to building(LAG) . ❑feet ❑meters � Highest adjacent(flnished)grdde next to buflding(HAG) . ❑feet ❑meters h) Lowest adJacent grade at lowest elevation of deck or stairs,including . ❑feet ❑meters structural support SECTION D-SURVEYOR,ENGINEER,OR ARCHITECT CERTIFlCATION This certification is to be signed and sealed by a land surveyor,engineer,or architect authorized by law to certify elevation information.f certiYy thai Che fnformaUon on thls Certfftcate represents my best efforts to inierpret the data avaltable. i understand that arry false statemeM may be punishable by nne or imprtsonment untler 18 U.S.Code,Sectton 1001. - ❑Check here if comments are provided on back of form. Were Iatitude and I�gitude in Section A provided by a ❑Check here if attachments. licensed land surveyor? ❑Yes ❑No Certifler's Name ��ense Number PLACE SEAL ' TRie Company Name �ER� Atltlress Clty State ZIP Code Signature Date Telepho�e FEMA form 08fr433(Revised 7/12) See reverse side for continuation, Replaces ali previous editions. . _ _ ____,