HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence march 10 2020
Grant, Kelly
From:Jeffrey Johnson <jjohnson@holmesandmcgrath.com>
Sent:Tuesday, March 10, 2020 7:19 AM
To:Grant, Kelly
Subject:RE: 300 Long Pond Road
Thank you, Kelly. We will inform the owners and let you know how they wish to proceed.
Please reply if you have any questions or need more information.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey L. Johnson
Professional Wetland Permitting Consultant
holmes and mcgrath, inc.
civil engineers and land surveyors
205 worcester court, suite A4
falmouth, ma 02540
office 508-548-3564
mobile 508-737-0953
jjohnson@holmesandmcgrath.com
From: Grant, Kelly <KGrant@yarmouth.ma.us>
Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 9:37 AM
To: Jeffrey Johnson <jjohnson@holmesandmcgrath.com>; Mike Rockwell <mike@thehouseco.com>
Cc: Tim Santos <tsantos@holmesandmcgrath.com>
Subject: RE: 300 Long Pond Road
Hi Jeffrey
The feedback I received from the Commission was that the 35 foot no-disturb zone should be restored with native
plantings.
Thanks
1
Kelly Grant
Conservation Administrator
Town of Yarmouth
508-398-2231 Ext 1288
kgrant@yarmouth.ma.us
From: Jeffrey Johnson \[mailto:jjohnson@holmesandmcgrath.com\]
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 11:12 AM
To: Grant, Kelly <KGrant@yarmouth.ma.us>; Mike Rockwell <mike@thehouseco.com>
Cc: Tim Santos <tsantos@holmesandmcgrath.com>
Subject: 300 Long Pond Road
Attention! This email originates outside of the organization. Do not open attachments or click links unless you
are sure this email is from a known sender and you know the content is safe. Call the sender to verify if unsure.
Otherwise delete this email.
Kelly,
Thank you for meeting with us at 300 Long Pond Road yesterday. It was a pleasure meeting you and I look forward to
working with you to resolve the compliance issues for this property.
Please find attached a pdf file containing two colored versions of the proposed plan.
SK-1 shows the removal of the patio, relocation of the fence and approximately 1,900 square feet of plantings using a
line 5 feet landward of the existing patio as you suggested in the field.
SK-2 shows the removal of the patio, relocation of the fence and approximately 2,550 square feet of plantings if the
Commission required the restoration out to the full 35-foot no touch zone.
Sk-1 is obviously more desirable than SK-2 for the homeowner as it does provide some limited back yard area.
Both version show a proposed 4-foot wide path through the buffer area.
Please have an informal discussion with the Commission to see if they might accept the restoration shown in SK-1 to
comply with the outstanding Order of Conditions 86-1645.
We understand that any approvals for the proposed addition would include a condition to perform the restoration work
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or prior to construction, as the Commission would determine.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Please reply if you have any questions or need more information.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey L. Johnson
Professional Wetland Permitting Consultant
holmes and mcgrath, inc.
2
civil engineers and land surveyors
205 worcester court, suite A4
falmouth, ma 02540
office 508-548-3564
mobile 508-737-0953
jjohnson@holmesandmcgrath.com
3