HomeMy WebLinkAbout590-600-602 Rte 28 - 12 Winslow Gray COMPLETE DRC PACKET 042820Review is: D Conceptual ~ Formal
D Binding (404 MotelsNCOD/R.O.A.D. Project) ~Non-binding (All other commercial projects)
Review is by: D Planning Board ~ Design Review Committee
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
Meeting Date: April 28, 2020 at 4 PM -Virtual Meeting Map: 32 Lots: 64 & 65
Applicant: Great Island Plaza LLC Zone(s): B2, HMOD1, VCOD VC1, ROAD
Site Location: 590, 600 & 602 Route 28 and 12 Winslow Gray Road
Persons Present:
OCR Members Present Yarmouth Town Staff Present Guests
Chris Vincent Kathy Williams Brian Yergatian, BSC Group
Dick Martin Mark Grylls Jan Kvietok, Tatra Building
Jack McCormack Dan Santacroce. Dennis Colwell Architects
Sara Porter Chaya Rosenberg, Applicant
Jean Kampas, Nutter McCiennen & Fish
DRC Review for this project started at: 4:00 PM
DRC Review ended at: 5:59 PM
On a motion by Jack McCormack, seconded by Sara Porter, the Design Review Committee (DRC) voted (4-0)
to adjourn the April 28, 2020 DRC meeting at 5:59 PM.
Project Summary
General Description: Applicant is proposing to redevelop the project site under the B2 zoning district including
renovations and reconstruction of the existing commercial building at 590, 600 and 602 Route 28, demolition of the
existing building at 12 Winslow Gray Road, reconfiguration of site access drives and parking areas, installation of a
new pressure-dosed septic system, and improvements to drainage facilities, utilities and landscaping. No
modifications are proposed for the existing Post Office building.
Summary of Presentation:
Jan Kvietok, Tatra Building, introduced the project team and gave a brief overview of the project. The lots are planned
to be combined. The building at 12 Winslow Gray and the east end of the strip mall will be removed. There are some
proposed additions to the building. One area will be rebuilt with a 2nd floor residential unit. Unit 7· will be a completely
new building with retail on the first floor and office space on the second floor. Units 5 & 6 will have extensions in the
rear to add square footage and functionality for these smaller units.
Brian Yergatian, BSC Group, gave an overview of the site improvements. The property contains 2.04 acres of land.
The proposed uses are shown in the parking table and need 82 parking spaces with 55 proposed including 7
handicapped spaces. Stormwater treatment and subsurface drainage is proposed for the site. Another major
improvement is upgrading the septic system by replacing the existing four individual systems with one system. The
landscaping plan includes a variety of trees and shrubs and flowering plants.
Jan Kvietok reviewed the building renderings which were meant to resemble the building facades in the 1960s,
making it a desirable place to go. The entire building will get new windows and doors and most of the siding will be
replaced. Proposing to use Azek trim to rebuild the storefronts, along with some brick veneer. Planning on
maintaining most of the historic uses in the plaza, including convenience store, restaurants and hair salon. Unit 7 will
be an entirely new building to replace the existing structure. Looking at a bakery or coffee shop. The second floor will
be offices for now with the potential for residential in the future. There may be some rear entrances to some of the
units depending on the interior layout of the units. There are some shared bathrooms shown for two of the units.
Planning on installing a sprinkler system.
DRC Questions & Discussions:
Chris Vincent asked about what is going into 12 Winslow Gray Road. Jan Kvietok indicated it is open space for now,
but reserved for future development. Brain Yergatian noted there will be a septic tank installed for a future
connection. Dick Martin noted the septic tank should have H-20 loading as parking may be required in this area.
Jack McCormack asked if all three lots are in the B2 zoning district, which they are.
Dick Martin asked about 18 Winslow Gray Road which is also owned by the Applicant. He has concerns about not
meeting the buffer requirements as currently shown and not selling the parcel separately. Jeannie Kampas noted that
the lot to the north is owned by Ms . Rosenberg but is the subject of litigation right now so they eliminated this parcel to
be able to move forward with the project now. There is a buffer issue, and will address the buffer in the future and
hope it will ultimately be redeveloped as part of this development. Dick Martin noted that there was no plan to leave
existing buffers to the east and north naturally treed. He noted that the buffer trees along Winslow Gray Road should
be added, along with additional foundation shrubs and plantings in front of the Post Office. The site plan shows the 4
parking spaces set aside for the 606-610 Route 28. Dick Martin asked about the type of trees in the center island and
recommended that in-lot trees, not shrubs, be included in the parking lot. Additional shrubbery would also be good.
He felt the landscaping plan as shown was not adequate. Jan Kvietok noted trees could be added to the 12 Winslow
Gray Road buffer. Dick Martin noted that some existing buffer trees could be saved to minimize the need for new
plantings. Jan Kvietok indicated they could retain good trees.
Dick Martin felt the circulation was good and elimination of the curb cut was good. He was comfortable with the rest
of the site plan. Brian Yergatian noted the thin strip in front of the Post Office could impede site distance if planted
with a tree. He noted that the southeast corner of the rear parking is a hydrangea, but that corner is right on the edge
of the leaching field and he would like to stay away from that. Dick Martin felt the site should meet the bylaw as close
to possible. Kathy Williams asked if the leaching field could be rotated to give additional space for planting a tree.
Brian Yergatian thought that could be done. Dick Martin felt the parking layout was good and doesn't feel you would
need the 82 spaces, especially as space is available at 12 Winslow Gray for additional parking. Dick Martin asked if
anything was being done to the Post Office building. Jan indicated nothing was proposed for the building at this time,
but that they are angling the parking spaces and adding some landscaping. Jan noted some previous siding work
done to the Post Office a few years ago, along with some painting and patching of the pavement. Dick Martin noted
that with the improvements on either side, it would be good to improve the Post Office building.
Dick Martin inquired as to whether there were any west side elevations? Jan Kvietok noted the Left Elevation on
Sheet A2.0. Dick Martin mentioned the large expanse of wall. Jan Kvietok indicated this is the convenience store that
has interior fixtures. Dick Martin felt something is needed to break up the wall. Chris Vincent suggested an arbor.
Sara Porter suggested a smaller gable with a window in it that could project out. Chaya Rosenberg noted she had
added the two windows you see in the existing gable end and the rest of the wall could possibly be a mural. Chaya
felt an arbor is more for where someone can sit and there may not be enough room in that location . The center island
of the parking lot may be better. Jan Kvietok noted they were planning on installing foundation plantings along this
wall and can dress it up with plantings and trellises. Sara asked about a rendering. Chris Vincent noted he meant a
trellis flat against the wall and not a pergola. Jan Kvietok noted he will try to get some visuals along the left elevation
of the building.
Sara Porter noted she isn't usually a fan of brick, but feels it is done sparingly here. The cornice moulding at the hair
salon could be extended around the east and north elevation. The pizza place cornice moulding in the front should be
included in the rear. She also asked about the gable end of units 2 & 3 and whether it extends out. Dan Santacroce
stated that it does extend out. Sara Porter noted it is not included in the Revised Elevations and Roof Plan. Dan
Santacroce stated that the plans can be updated to denote the gable. Sara Porter felt that the back of the building is
not as dynamic as the front and patrons will be parking in the back. She suggested adding more visual appeal to the
rear fa~ade. Dick Martin concurred with Sara and noted that the rear can be seen from Winslow Gray.
Jack McCormack asked about the floor plan in the restaurant, which shows stairs going down and whether there a
basement. Dan Santacroce noted that there is a basement which will be used for storage.
Chris Vincent asked about electric service connections and condensers, and it would be good to show them on the
plans. Dan Santacroce said they are working on them.
Sara Porter inquired about the runoff from the Delicatessen roof. Dan Santacroce noted he would need to cricket the
roof. Kathy Williams asked about funneling water to the center of the building and snow loads. Dan Santacroce
noted there will also be an internal roof drain in the center area. From a snow load perspective, they are checking the
roof framing for code compliance. Jan Kvietok noted they were hoping to have roof mounted equipment which can be
hidden in this center roof area. Sara asked about other ways to hide the mechanicals with increasing the height of the
walls at the Hair Salon and Basil Thai. Jan noted he would need to look at water loads but that something could be
done. Chaya Rosenberg noted that some landscaping in the rear of the building would help to make it more
welcoming. She also liked the idea of false windows. Dick Martin noted there are some green spaces in the rear
which could accommodate landscaping.
Dick Martin noted it was a good proposal on a site that has been neglected. He's thrilled to see the repairs to the
existing building. Adding of the architectural and landscaping comments noted here will just add to the property. Jack
McCormack echoed Dick's comments and felt it would be a good addition to Route 28.
Kathy Williams asked about the dumpster locations and access for garbage trucks. Jan Kvietok noted that they tried
to find the best place for the dumpsters where the employees can have easy access, especially in the winter time.
Jan Kvietok felt this would be the best location and they are hiding them with arborvitae and fencing and they will be
accessible for smaller trucks. Brian Yergatian felt a smaller garbage truck would be able to access these areas as the
travelway is wide in this area. Brian Yergatian will run an Autoturn analysis and have it available for Site Plan Review.
Sara Porter had some sketches for the rear elevation that she would like to give to Dan Santacroce. Dan Santacroce
was open to suggestions.
Dick Martin asked about outside dining. Jan Kvietok said outside seating was included in the calculations for the
restaurants as the sidewalk is wider. Sara Porter asked about the variable sidewalk, and whether it needs to be that
wide and whether you could add to the width of the buffer. Jan Kvietok wanted to keep the sidewalk wide for a larger
crowd and outside seating, benches and planters.
Review Comments In Relation To The Design Standards
SITING STRATEGIES
Sect. 1 , Streetscape 0 N/ A ~ Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies:
Significant improvements have been made to the streetscape through the elimination of much of the parking
in front of the building, elimination of the curb cut on Winslow Gray Road closest to Route 28, and the
addition of the landscaped buffer along the roads. The majority of the parking is to the side/rear of the
buildings with a pedestrian corridor between the buildings from the main parking area to access the street-
oriented entrances. The front of the buildings face the street with a wide sidewalk and 7 parallel parking
spaces in front of the main building (similar to on-street parking). Pedestrian walkways are shown from the
building entrances to the public sidewalks.
Although the building modulations are less than 5' every 50', the addition of awnings, a variety of different
architectural features, wall heights and roof lines add interest to the buildings, reducing the visual impact of
the building size.
Sect. 2, Tenant Spaces ~ N/A 0 Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies :
Sect. 3, Define Street Edge 0 N/A ~Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies:
Although some parking remains in the front, the buildings are still relatively close to the roadway. The
addition of street trees helps to further define the street edge. While a wider buffer along Route 28 would be
preferred, a more comprehensive landscape plan is recommended along Route 28 and along the corner of
Winslow Gray Road to add planting beds with flowers and shrubs. The planting bed at the corner around the
proposed sign only includes one type of plant (switch grass) and the trees are located too far apart. Continue
the daylily buffer proposed for the adjacent property at 606-610 Route 28 to in front of the Post Office.
Sect. 4, Shield Large Buildings ~ N/A 0 Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies :
Sect. 5, Design a 2nd Story 0 N/A ~Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies:
Sect. 61 Use Tope to Screen New Development ~ N/A D Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
The proposed uses along with the proposed improvements do not need to be screened with any significant
enhanced topography.
Sect. 71 Landscape Buffers/Screening D N/A D Meets Standards, or~ Discrepancies:
No existing 4" diameter buffer trees are shown to remain, with the buffers along the abutting properties being
impacted by grading/drainage and no new buffer plantings are shown. Retain more existing buffer trees and
supplement with proposed buffer plantings. Provide screening for the proposed transformer, condensers
and building electric meters. Provide foundation plantings around the building. The addition of trellises and
plantings would be beneficial along the blank wall along the Left Elevation (west side).
Sect. 81 Parking Lot Visibility D N/A ~ Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
The new parking lots are located to the rear and side of the buildings and the existing parking in the front has
been significantly reduced. Also see Comments under Sect. 3, Define Street Edge.
Sect. 91 Break up Large Parking Lots D N/A ~Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
Unfortunately the location of the subsurface septic system impacts the ability to plant trees in some of the
parking lot islands, but the large center island allows for canopy trees. Some island plantings are shown as
shrubs and need to be 3" caliper trees. Retain existing larger healthy trees in the center island where
possible.
Sect. 101 Locate Utilities Underground D N/A ~ Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
Sect. 11 I Shield Loading Areas D N/A ~ Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
The location of the central dumpsters are very visible for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic, and
the angled orientation may make it difficult for trash truck pick-up. Provide improved screening, and
utilize solid white vinyl fencing. Provide Autoturn movements for a trash truck at Site Plan Review.
Site lighting will be on a precast base or flush mounted.
BUILDING STRATEGIES:
Sect. 1 I Break Down Building Mass-Multiple Bldgs. D N/A ~Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
Sect. 21 Break Down Building Mass-Sub-Masses D N/A ~Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
Petitioner agrees to improve the look of the rear of the building to potentially include landscaping, false
windows, trellises, or extension of cornices. Sara Porter will provide some ideas to the Applicant's Architect.
Sect. 31 Vary Facade Lines D N/A D Meets Standards, or~ Discrepancies:
The building modulations are less than 5' every 50'. However, the addition of awnings and a variety of
different architectural features and roof lines add interest to the buildings, reducing the visual impact of the
building size.
Sect. 41 Vary Wall Heights D N/A ~ Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
Sect. 51 Vary Roof Lines D N/A ~Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
Sect. 61 Bring Down Building Edges ~ N/A D Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
The majority of the building is single story and there is no need for smaller attached masses to break up the
building size.
Sect. 71 Vary Building Mat'ls For Depth D N/A ~Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
Sect. 8. Use Traditional & Nat'l. Building Mat'ls D N/A ~ Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
Sect. 9. Incorporate Pedestrian-scaled Features D N/A ~Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
Awnings, wide sidewalks and a pedestrian walkway between the buildings add pedestrian scale features to
the buildings.
Sect. 10. Incorporate Energy-efficient Design D N/A ~Meets Standards, or D Discrepancies:
Next step for applicant: ~ Go to Site Plan Review D Return to Design Review for Formal Review
On a motion by Jack McCormack, seconded by Sara Porter, the Design Review Committee (DRC) voted (4-0)
to approve these DRC Comments as meeting minutes for the April 28, 2020 DRC Meeting for the proposed
redevelopment at 590, 600 & 602 Route 28 and 12 Winslow Gray Road.
Received by Applicant(s)
ATTACHMENTS:
• April 28, 2020 Agenda and Virtual Meeting Information
• April 23, 2020 e-mail from Kathy Williams and Aerial
• DRC Application:
o DRC Application and Materials Specification Sheet
o Cut Sheets on Azek Trim, Column Wrap & Moulding, Boral Exterior Siding, Coronado
Weathered Brick, SBC Weathering Stain, Rejuvenation Lighting (sconces, wall fixture, and
shepherds hood post light)
o Cut Sheets on Marvin Commercial Doors, Picture Windows, and Double Hund Windows
o Photo of similar free standing sign
o Site Plans: All plans prepared by BSC Group, dated March 26, 2020, unless otherwise noted:
• Title Sheet
• C2.0 -Existing Conditions Plan, prepared by Baxter Nye, dated April 13, 2020
• Layout & Materials Plan
• Grading & Drainage Plan
• Utility Plan
• Septic Design Plan
• Erosion Control Plan
• Landscape & Lighting Plan
• Detail Plan
• Detail Sheet I (Sheet 10 of 13)
• Detail Sheet II (Sheet 11 of 13)
• Septic System Detail Sheet I (Sheet 12 of 13)
• Septic System Detail Sheet II (Sheet 13 of 13)
o Architectural Plans: All Architectural plans prepared by Dennis Colwell Architects of
Foxborough, MA and dated April 22, 2020, unless otherwise noted:
• A.1.0 -First Floor Plan (west end)
• A.1.1 -First Floor Plan (east end)
• A.1.2 -Second Floor Plan (west end)
• A.1.3 -Second Floor Plan (east end)
• A.1.4 -Roof Plan, dated April 27, 2020
• A2.0-Elevations, dated April27, 2020
• A2.1 -Unit "7" Elevations
o Building Renderings: Fourteen (14) pages of 11 x17 renderings of the exterior of the proposed
building renovations and reconstruction.
1
Williams, Kathleen
From:Williams, Kathleen
Sent:Thursday, April 23, 2020 3:52 PM
To:Charles Adams (adams2430@gmail.com); Chris Vincent
(christophervincent@comcast.net); Dick Martin (dick@dickmartinera.com); Jack
McCormack (johnhmccormackjr@comcast.net); Sara J Porter
(sjparch@comcast.net)
Subject:DRC Virtual Meeting - April 28th at 4 PM - Great Island Plaza
Attachments:042820 DRC Agenda - Great Island Plaza TC.pdf; aerial.pdf; Great Island Plaza
COMPLETE DRC App 042320.pdf
Hi Guys,
Please find attached the DRC Submittal Application for the Great Island Plaza DRC virtual meeting scheduled for
Tuesday April 28, 2020 at 4 PM. I’m sorry this information is getting to you so late, but I just received the final
submittal information today.
The proposed project involves two of the three parcels with the renovation/reconstruction of the existing building
along Route 28 and site improvements. The abandoned building at 12 Winslow Gray Road will be torn down for
now, but I would expect them to construct a commercial building there in the future.
Planner Comments for Consideration by the DRC: Please note that Design Review is advisory for this project.
Architecture: Overall I really like what they are proposing and I have very few comments to offer. I like the
different materials, colors and storefronts shown that add a lot of interest and variety. Although the building
modulations are less than the 5’ offset, the building is small and there is enough architectural interest that I think it’s
fine. There are some stretches of roof expanse, but I don’t think they would benefit from dormers, although the
gable end on the Right Elevation feels a little heavy in profile. There is a plain wall along the western elevation that
would benefit from windows, or if not possible due to interior usage, foundation plantings should be provided to
soften this wall.
Site: They made significant improvements to the streetscape through the elimination of the large expanse of
parking in the front, adding a landscaped buffer along the public roads, and eliminating the existing curb cut on
Winslow Gray Road close to Route 28. There are now only 7 parallel spaces in the front with a wide sidewalk for
amenities such as tables and umbrellas.
1. Buffer Plantings: No existing 4”diameter buffer trees are shown to remain, with the buffers along the
abutting properties being impacted by grading/drainage. No new buffer plantings are shown adjacent to
the other properties.
2. Landscaping: At 10.5’, I would have preferred the Route 28 buffer to be wider, especially as the existing
sidewalk within Route 28 is not very wide in this area. A more comprehensive landscape plan along Route
28 and the corner of Winslow Gray Road should include planting beds with flowers and shrubs. The planting
bed at the corner around the proposed sign only includes switch grass. Many of the plantings shown are not
trees, but shrubs. Continuation of the daylily buffer front the adjacent property to in front of the Post Office
should be provided. Foundation plantings around the building should be provided, especially to soften the
blank wall along the western elevation. The location of the subsurface septic system impacts locations for
in‐lot trees.
3. Dumpsters: The angle and access to the dumpsters is questionable. It is always difficult to site dumpsters
that are not highly visible, but are easily accessed by the users and for trash pickup. The detail shows
bollards around the dumpster which are unattractive, but not sure if actually being proposed here.
2
4. Sidewalks: Sidewalks need to be provided to the rear entrances.
5. Parking: The parking seems light for the demand, but that is something that can be discussed in Site Plan
Review.
Although the agenda includes the link to the Webinar, please be sure to enter the Webinar using the “Join Webinar”
link in the e‐mail you received from Kelly Grant on April 17, 2020. This will have you enter as a panelist. All others
will enter as Attendees and will need to be recognized by me and made a panelist to present the project. I’d be
happy to schedule a time for a mock meeting if anyone would like to do so. I will also be coordinating with the
Applicant regarding their presentation.
I will place in the mail today. Please confirm receipt of this e‐mail as the attachments are a bit large.
Thanks,
Kathy
----------------------------------------
Kathy Williams, PE
Yarmouth Town Planner
1146 Route 28
South Yarmouth, MA 02664-4492
(508) 398-2231 Ext 1276
kwilliams@yarmouth.ma.us
April 3, 2020
Great Island Plaza LLC
c/o Tatra Building Company, Inc., 1268 Route 28, S. Yarmouth, MA 02664
(833) 468-2872 jk@tatraco.com
590, 600 & 602 Main Street and 12 Winslow Gray Road
Map 32, Parcels 64 & 65
B-2, HMOD-1, VCOD-1, R.O.A.D. Zone X
BSC Group, Inc., 349 Route 28, Unit D, West Yarmouth, MA 02673
The redevelopment of the Site includes renovation of the existing strip mall building at 590, 600
& 602 Main Street, demolition of the existing building at 12 Winslow Gray Road,
reconfiguration of site access drives and parking areas, installation of a new pressure-dosed
septic system, improvement of site drainage facilities, utilities and landscaping.
April 3, 2020
x
x
4/28/20
4:00 PM - Virtual Meeting
Great Island Plaza LLC
590, 600 & 602 Main Street, West Yarmouth, MA 02673
GREAT ISLAND PLAZAREDEVELOPMENT590, 600 & 602 ROUTE 28, 12 WINSLOW GRAY ROADWEST YARMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTSMARCH 26, 20201TITLE SHEET2EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN3DEMOLITION PLAN4LAYOUT & MATERIALS PLAN5GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN6UTILITY PLAN7SEPTIC DESIGN PLAN8EROSION CONTROL PLAN9LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN10-11DETAILS12-13SEPTIC SYSTEM DETAILSGREAT ISLAND PLAZA LLCC/O TATRA BUILDING COMPANY1268 ROUTE 28SOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664LOCUS MAPISSUED FOR PERMITTINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONINDEX OF DRAWINGS349 Main Street - Route 28W. Yarmouth, Massachusetts02673508 778 8919LOCUS
MAIN STREET (ROUTE 28)WINSLOW GRAY ROAD ·············LOCUS MAP Scale: 1"=500'SITEC2.0Existing ConditionsPlanBAXTER NYEENGINEERING &SURVEYINGThe RK Realty Trustc/o Jan Kvietok1268 Route 28South Yarmouth, MA 02664590-600 & 602 Main Streetand 12 Winslow Gray RoadWest Yarmouth, MAFOR PERMIT ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET TITLEDATE:CHECKED BY:JOB NO:DRAWN BY:DESCRIPTIONDATEPREPARED FOR:PROJECT TITLESHEET NOSCALE:STAMPCONSULTANTFILE:CONSULTANTSTAMPO:\2019\2019-030\CIVIL\PLOT\2019-030 C2.0 EC2.dwg, EC, 4/13/2020 3:51:02 PM, AutoCAD PDF (High Quality Print).pc3, ARCH full bleed D (24.00 x 36.00 Inches), 1:1
MAIN STREET (ROUTE 28)WINSLOW GRAY ROAD 349 Main Street - Route 28West Yarmouth, Massachusetts02673508 778 8919INISSUED FOR PERMITTINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONGREAT ISLAND PLAZAREDEVELOPMENT590, 600 & 602 ROUTE 28WEST YARMOUTHMASSACHUSETTS(BARNSTABLE COUNTY)DEMOLITION PLANMARCH 26, 202012 WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
MAIN STREET (ROUTE 28)WINSLOW GRAY ROAD 349 Main Street - Route 28West Yarmouth, Massachusetts02673508 778 8919INISSUED FOR PERMITTINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONGREAT ISLAND PLAZAREDEVELOPMENT590, 600 & 602 ROUTE 28WEST YARMOUTHMASSACHUSETTS(BARNSTABLE COUNTY)LAYOUT & MATERIALSPLANMARCH 26, 202012 WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
MAIN STREET (ROUTE 28)WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
D DDDDDDDDD
D
D
D
D
D
D349 Main Street - Route 28West Yarmouth, Massachusetts02673508 778 8919INISSUED FOR PERMITTINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONGREAT ISLAND PLAZAREDEVELOPMENT590, 600 & 602 ROUTE 28WEST YARMOUTHMASSACHUSETTS(BARNSTABLE COUNTY)GRADING & DRAINAGEPLANMARCH 26, 202012 WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
MAIN STREET (ROUTE 28)WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
S
SSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
D DDDDDDDDD
D
D
D
D
D
DSSSSSW W
WWWWWGEEEEEEEEE
EG G G G
W W GGGGGGGGGSSSS349 Main Street - Route 28West Yarmouth, Massachusetts02673508 778 8919INISSUED FOR PERMITTINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONGREAT ISLAND PLAZAREDEVELOPMENT590, 600 & 602 ROUTE 28WEST YARMOUTHMASSACHUSETTS(BARNSTABLE COUNTY)UTILITY PLANMARCH 26, 202012 WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
MAIN STREET (ROUTE 28)WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
S
SSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SSSSSSSSS349 Main Street - Route 28West Yarmouth, Massachusetts02673508 778 8919INISSUED FOR PERMITTINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONGREAT ISLAND PLAZAREDEVELOPMENT590, 600 & 602 ROTUE 28WEST YARMOUTHMASSACHUSETTS(BASNSTABLE COUNTY)SEPTIC DESIGN PLANMARCH 26, 202012 WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
MAIN STREET (ROUTE 28)WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
MAIN STREET (ROUTE 28)WINSLOW GRAY ROAD 349 Main Street - Route 28West Yarmouth, Massachusetts02673508 778 8919INISSUED FOR PERMITTINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONGREAT ISLAND PLAZAREDEVELOPMENT590, 600 & 602 ROUTE 28WEST YARMOUTHMASSACHUSETTS(BARNSTABLE COUNTY)EROSION CONTROL PLANMARCH 26, 202012 WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
MAIN STREET (ROUTE 28)WINSLOW GRAY ROAD 349 Main Street - Route 28West Yarmouth, Massachusetts02673508 778 8919INISSUED FOR PERMITTINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONGREAT ISLAND PLAZAREDEVELOPMENT590, 600 & 602 ROUTE 28WEST YARMOUTHMASSACHUSETTS(BARNSTABLE COUNTY)LANDSCAPE & LIGHTINGPLANMARCH 26, 202012 WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
PAVEMENT OR FINISHED GRADEPAVEMENT SUB-BASE (WHEN APPLICABLE)NATURALLY COMPACTED FILLCULTEC NO. 410 NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILEAROUND STONE. TOP AND SIDES MANDATORY,BOTTOM PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN PREFERENCECULTEC RECHARGER 330XLHDHEAVY-DUTY CHAMBERCULTEC HVLV FC-24 FEED CONNECTORWHERE SPECIFIED7.5' [2.29 m] MIN.CULTEC NO. 4800 WOVEN GEOTEXTILE BENEATH FEED CONNECTORS10.0' [3.0 m] MIN.CULTEC NO. 4800 WOVEN GEOTEXTILE BENEATH INLET PIPES6.0 INCH [152 mm] MIN. DEPTH OF1-2 INCH [25-50 mm] WASHED, CRUSHEDSTONE ABOVE CHAMBERS12.0 INCH [305 mm] MIN. WIDTH OF 1-2 INCH [25-50 mm]WASHED, CRUSHED STONE BORDER SURROUNDINGALL CHAMBERS6.0 INCH [152 mm] MIN. DEPTH OF1-2 INCH [25-50 mm] WASHED, CRUSHEDSTONE BENEATH CHAMBERSPIPE PER ENGINEER DESIGN.PIPE TO BE INSERTED 12.0 INCHES [305 mm] MIN. INTO CHAMBER.MAXIMUM PIPE SIZE:24" [600 mm] HDPE24" [600 mm] PVCRECHARGER 330XLHDHEAVY DUTY CHAMBERMINIMUM 95% COMPACTED FILLPAVEMENT OR FINISHED GRADECULTEC NO. 410 NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE AROUND STONE. TOP ANDSIDES MANDATORY, BOTTOM PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN PREFERENCE6.0" [152 mm] MIN.30.5" [775 mm]6.0" [152 mm] MIN.12.0' [3.66 m] MAX.COVER DEPTH58.0" [1473 mm] MIN.CENTER TO CENTER52.0" [1321 mm]12.0" [305 mm] MIN.10.0" [254 mm] MIN. FOR PAVED12.0" [305 mm] MIN. FOR UNPAVEDHVLV FC-24 FEED CONNECTORWHERE SPECIFIED1-2 INCH [25-50 mm] WASHED, CRUSHEDSTONE SURROUNDING CHAMBERSCULTEC NO. 4800 WOVEN GEOTEXTILE TO BE PLACED BENEATH INTERNAL MANIFOLDFEATURE AND BENEATH ALL INLET/OUTLET PIPES (FOR SCOUR PROTECTION)PROJECT ENGINEER OF RECORD OR GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT THEREQUIRED BEARING CAPACITY OF SUB-GRADE SOILS HAS BEEN METPAVEMENTOR FINISHED GRADEMINIMUM 95% COMPACTED FILLCULTEC NO. 410 NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE AROUNDSTONE. TOP AND SIDES MANDATORY, BOTTOM PERENGINEER'S DESIGN PREFERENCE1-2 INCH [25-50 mm] WASHED, CRUSHED STONESURROUNDING CHAMBERSOPTIONAL INSPECTION PORT(SEE ZOOM DETAIL )12.0" [305 mm] MIN.RECHARGER 330XLHDHEAVY DUTY CHAMBER6.0" [152 mm] MIN.30.5" [775 mm]6.0" [152 mm] MIN.10.0" [254 mm] MIN. FOR PAVED12.0" [305 mm] MIN. FOR UNPAVEDINLET/OUTLET PIPE PER ENGINEER DESIGN.PIPE TO BE INSERTED 12.0" [305 mm] MIN. INTO CHAMBERMAXIMUM PIPE SIZE:24" [600 mm] HDPE24" [600 mm] PVCSIDE PORTAL TO BE CUT IN FIELD TO ALLOW FOR HVLV FC-24 FEEDCONNECTOR OR STORM PIPE AS NEEDED (SEE FIGURE 1). CUT SHALLBE WITHIN 1/4" [6 mm] TOLERANCE OF SIDE PORTAL TRIM GUIDELINECULTEC NO. 4800 WOVEN GEOTEXTILE TO BE PLACED BENEATH INTERNAL MANIFOLDFEATURE AND BENEATH ALL INLET/OUTLET PIPES (FOR SCOUR PROTECTION)PROJECT ENGINEER OF RECORD OR GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT IS RESPONSIBLE FORENSURING THAT THE REQUIRED BEARING CAPACITY OF SUB-GRADE SOILS HAS BEEN METPAVEMENTOR FINISHED GRADE12.0" [305 mm] MIN.24.0" [610 mm] MIN.SQUARE14.5" [368 mm]10.25"[260 mm]NEENAH FOUNDRY MODEL R-5900-A(OR EQUAL) HEAVY DUTY FRAME AND LID6.0" [150 mm] SDR-35 / SCH 40 PVC(INSERTED 8.0" [203 mm] INTO CHAMBER)TRIM CHAMBER INSPECTION PORT KNOCK-OUT TOMATCH O.D. OF 6.0" [150mm] INSPECTION PORT PIPE6.0" [150 mm] SDR-35 / SCH. 40 PVC COUPLING6.0" [150 mm] SDR-35 / SCH. 40 PVC RISER6.0" [150 mm] SDR-35 / SCH. 40 PVC ENDCAPCLEAN-OUT ADAPTER W/ SCREW-IN CAPFIELD PLACED CLASS "C" CONCRETE12.0" [300 mm] SDR-35 / SCH. 40 PVC COLLARMAINTAIN 6.0" [152 mm] CLEARANCE BETWEENHEAVY DUTY LID AND PVC CLEAN-OUT CAPPLAN VIEW5PRODUCT SPECIFICATION:1. PEAK HYDRAULIC FLOW: 18.0 cfs (510 l/s)2. MIN SEDIMENT STORAGE CAPACITY: 0.7 cu. yd. (0.5 cu. m.)3. OIL STORAGE CAPACITY: 191 gal. (723 liters)4. MAXIMUM INLET/OUTLET PIPE DIAMETERS: 24 in. (600 mm)5. THE TREATMENT SYSTEM SHALL USE AN INDUCED VORTEX TO SEPARATE POLLUTANTS FROM STORMWATER RUNOFF.6. FOR MORE PRODUCT INFORMATION INCLUDING REGULATORY ACCEPTANCES, PLEASE VISIT https://hydro-int.com/en/products/first-defenseGENERAL NOTES:1. General Arrangement drawings only. Contact Hydro International for site specific drawings.2. The diameter of the inlet and outlet pipes may be no more than 24".3. Multiple inlet pipes possible (refer to project plan).4. Inlet/outlet pipe angle can vary to align with drainage network (refer to project plan.s)5. Peak flow rate and minimum height limited by available cover and pipe diameter.6. Larger sediment storage capacity may be provided with a deeper sump depth.4PARTS LISTDESCRIPTIONSIZE (mm)SIZE (in)QTYITEMI.D. PRECAST MANHOLE12004811INTERNAL COMPONENTS(PRE-INSTALLED)12FRAME AND COVER (ROUND)7503013OUTLET PIPE (BY OTHERS)600 (MAX)24 (MAX)14INLET PIPE (BY OTHERS)600 (MAX)24 (MAX)15AASECTION A-A13442PIPE ELEV: 4.97 ft [1.515 m] (MINIMUM)T.O.S ELEV.: 8.07 ft [2.460 m] (MINIMUM) [2.765 m]SUMP ELEV: .00 ft [.000 m]5HYDRO FRAME ANDCOVER (INCLUDED)GRADE RINGS BY OTHERSAS REQUIREDNOTE: ADDITIONAL HEIGHT MAYBEREQUIRED DEPENDING ON PIPE SIZEBOTTOM OF INTERNALS: 2.25 ft [.685 m]PREASSEMBLY REFERENCE: 3.47 ft [1.057 m]349 Main Street - Route 28West Yarmouth, Massachusetts02673508 778 8919INGREAT ISLAND PLAZAREDEVELOPMENT590, 600 & 602 ROUTE 28WEST YARMOUTHMASSACHUSETTS(BARNSTABLE COUNTY)DETAIL SHEET IMARCH 26, 202012 WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
349 Main Street - Route 28West Yarmouth, Massachusetts02673508 778 8919INGREAT ISLAND PLAZA REDEVLOPMENT590, 600 & 602 ROUTE 28WEST YARMOUTHMASSACHUSETTS(BARNSTABLE COUNTY)DETAIL SHEET IIMARCH 26, 202012 WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
349 Main Street - Route 28West Yarmouth, Massachusetts02673508 778 8919INISSUED FOR PERMITTINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONGREAT ISLAND PLAZAREDEVELOPMENT590, 600 & 602 ROUTE 28WEST YARMOUTHMASSACHUSETTS(BARNSTABLE COUNTY)SEPTIC SYSTEMDETAIL SHEET IMARCH 26, 202012 WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
349 Main Street - Route 28West Yarmouth, Massachusetts02673508 778 8919INISSUED FOR PERMITTINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONGREAT ISLAND PLAZAREDEVELOPMENT590, 600 & 602 ROUTE 28WEST YARMOUTHMASSACHUSETTS(BARNSTABLE COUNTY)SEPTIC SYSTEMDETAIL SHEET IIMARCH 26, 202012 WINSLOW GRAY ROAD
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$81,7
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$81,7
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$81,7
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$81,7
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$81,7
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$81,7
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP $81,7D
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$81,7E
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$81,7F
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$81,7G
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$5($581,76
*5($7,6/$1'3/$=$5('(9(/230(17$SULO,QJ$UFK7RPDV.RUEZZZWDWUDFRFRP$5($581,76