Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBaker LetterVSE Project Number: U3232.0221.201 November 4, 2020 My Generation Energy ATTENTION: Nathaniel Blois 100 Independence Drive, Suite 10 Hyannis, MA 02601 REFERENCE: Baker Residence: 62 Beacon Street, Yarmouth, MA 02664 Solar Array Installation To Whom It May Concern: Per your request,we have reviewed the existing structure at the above referenced site.The purpose of our review was to determine the adequacy of the existing structure to support the proposed installation of solar panels on the roof as shown on the panel layout plan. Based upon our review, we conclude that the existing structure is adequate to support the proposed solar panel installation. Design Parameters Code: Massachusetts State Residential Code (780 CMR Chapter 51, 9th Edition (2015 IRC)) Risk Category: II Design wind speed: 140 mph (3-sec gust) per ASCE 7-10 Wind exposure category: C Ground snow load: 30 psf Flat roof snow load, Pf: 25 psf Existing Roof Structure Roof structure: 2x8 rafters @ 16" O.C. Roofing material: composite shingles Roof pitch: 5:12 Connection to Roof Mounting connection: (1) 5/16" lag screw w/ min. 2.5" embedment into framing Maximum mounting spacing along rails: Zone 1: 48" O.C. (Beyond 4' from roof edge or ridge) Zone 2: 48" O.C. (Within 4' of roof edge parallel or perpendicular to slope) Zone 3: 24" O.C. (Within 4' of roof eave-eave corner or eave-ridge corner) (2) rails per row of panels, evenly spaced; panel length perpendicular to the rails not to exceed 67 in Conclusions Based upon our review,we conclude that the existing structure is adequate to support the proposed solar panel installation. The glass surface of the solar panels allows for a lower slope factor per ASCE 7,resulting in reduced design snow load on the panels.The gravity loads and;thus,the stresses of the structural elements,in the area of the solar array are either decreased or increased by no more than 5%.Therefore,the requirements of Section 807.4 of the 2015 IEBC as referenced in 780 CMR Chapter 34, 9th Edition are met and the structure is permitted to remain unaltered. 651 W. Galena Park Blvd., Ste. 101 / Draper, UT 84020 / T (801) 990-1775 / F (801) 990-1776 / www.vectorse.com VSE Project Number: U3232.0221.201 Baker Residence 11/4/2020 The solar array will be flush-mounted (no more than 6"above the roof surface)and parallel to the roof surface.Thus,we conclude that any additional wind loading on the structure related to the addition of the proposed solar array is negligible.The attached calculations verify the capacity of the connections of the solar array to the existing roof against wind (uplift),the governing load case.Because the increase in lateral forces is less than 10%,this addition meets the requirements of the exception in Section 807.5 of the 2015 IEBC as referenced in 780 CMR Chapter 34,9th Edition.Thus the existing lateral force resisting system is permitted to remain unaltered. Limitations Installation of the solar panels must be performed in accordance with manufacturer recommendations.All work performed must be in accordance with accepted industry-wide methods and applicable safety standards.The contractor must notify Vector Structural Engineering,LLC should any damage,deterioration or discrepancies between the as-built condition of the structure and the condition described in this letter be found.Connections to existing roof framing must be staggered,except at array ends,so as not to overload any existing structural member.The use of solar panel support span tables provided by others is allowed only where the building type,site conditions,site-specific design parameters,and solar panel configuration match the description of the span tables.The design of the solar panel racking (mounts,rails,etc.)and electrical engineering is the responsibility of others.Waterproofing around the roof penetrations is the responsibility of others.Vector Structural Engineering assumes no responsibility for improper installation of the solar array. VECTOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, LLC 11/04/2020 _______________________________________________________ Wells Holmes, S.E. MA License: 54240 - Expires: 06/30/2022 Project Engineer Enclosures WLH/brw 11/04/2020 651 W. Galena Park Blvd., Ste. 101 / Draper, UT 84020 / T (801) 990-1775 / F (801) 990-1776 / www.vectorse.com JOB NO.:U3232.0221.201 SUBJECT:WIND PRESSURE PROJECT:Baker Residence Label:Note: Calculations per ASCE 7-10 SITE-SPECIFIC WIND PARAMETERS: Basic Wind Speed [mph]:140 Notes: Exposure Category:C Risk Category:II Importance Factor, I: ADDITIONAL INPUT & CALCULATIONS: Height of Roof, h [ft]:15 (Approximate)Hip? Comp/Cladding Location:No Enclosure Classification: Zone 1 GCp:0.9 Figure 30.4-2B (enter negative pressure coefficients) Zone 2 GCp:1.7 Zone 3 GCp:2.6 α:9.5 Table 26.9-1 zg [ft]:900 Table 26.9-1 Kh:0.85 Table 30.3-1 Kzt:1 Equation 26.8-1 Kd:0.85 Table 26.6-1 Velocity Pressure, qh [psf]:36.2 Equation 30.3-1 GCpi:0 Table 26.11-1 PRESSURES:Equation 30.9-1 Zone 1, p [psf]:32.6 psf (1.0 W, Interior Zones, beyond 'a' from roof edge) Zone 2, p [psf]:61.5 psf (1.0 W, End Zones, within 'a' from roof edge) Zone 3, p [psf]:94.1 psf (1.0 W, Corner Zones, within 'a' from roof corner) (a= 3 ft) Solar Panel Array Gable/Hip Roofs 7° < θ ≤ 27° Enclosed Buildings Components and Cladding Wind Calculations ()()piphGCGCqp−= JOB NO.:U3232.0221.201 SUBJECT:CONNECTION PROJECT:Baker Residence Calculate Uplift Forces on Connection Pressure (0.6 Dead -0.6 Wind) (psf) Max Connection Spacing1 (ft) Max Trib. Area2 (ft2) Max Uplift Force (lbs) Zone 1 19.6 4.0 11.2 197 Zone 2 36.9 4.0 11.2 391 Zone 3 56.5 2.0 5.6 304 Calculate Connection Capacity Lag Screw Size [in]:5/16 Cd:1.6 NDS Table 2.3.2 Embedment3 [in]:2.5 Grade: Nominal Capacity [lbs/in]:205 NDS Table 12.2A Number of Screws:1 Prying Coefficient:1.4 Total Capacity [lbs]:586 Determine Result Maximum Demand [lbs]:391 Lag Screw Capacity [lbs]:586 Result:Capacity > Demand, Connection is adequate. Notes 1. 'Max Connection Spacing' is the spacing between connections along the rails. 2. 'Max Trib Area' is the product of the 'Max Connection Spacing' and 1/2 the panel width/height perpendicular to the rails. (2) rails per row of panels. Length of panels perpendicular to the rails shall not exceed 67". SPF (G = 0.42) 3. Embedment is measured from the top of the framing member to the beginning of the tapered tip of the lag screw. Embedment in sheathing or other material is not effective. The length of the tapered tip is not part of the embedment length. VECTOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS JOB NO.:U3232.0221.201 SUBJECT:GRAVITY LOADS PROJECT:Baker Residence CALCULATE ESTIMATED GRAVITY LOADS Roof Pitch: 5.0 :12 ROOF DEAD LOAD (D) Increase due to pitch Material weight [psf] Composite Shingles 1.08 2.0 1/2" Plywood 1.08 1.0 Framing 1.00 3.0 Insulation 1.00 0.0 1/2" Gypsum Clg.1.08 0.0 M, E & Misc 1.00 0.0 Total Original Roof DL PV Array DL 1.08 3 DL:1.08 ROOF LIVE LOAD (Lr) Existing Design Roof Live Load [psf]20 ASCE 7-10, Table 4-1 Roof Live Load With PV Array [psf]20 SNOW LOAD (S):w/ Solar Array Roof Slope [x:12]:5.0 Roof Slope [°]:23 Snow Ground Load, pg [psf]:30 ASCE 7-10, Section 7.2 Terrain Category:C ASCE 7-10, Table 7-2 Exposure of Roof:Fully Exposed ASCE 7-10, Table 7-2 Exposure Factor, Ce:0.9 ASCE 7-10, Table 7-2 Thermal Factor, Ct:1.1 ASCE 7-10, Table 7-3 Risk Category:II ASCE 7-10, Table 1.5-1 Importance Factor, Is:1.0 ASCE 7-10, Table 1.5-2 Flat Roof Snow Load, pf [psf]:25 ASCE 7-10, Equation 7.3-1 Minimum Roof Snow Load, pm [psf]:0 ASCE 7-10, Section 7.3.4 Unobstructed Slippery Surface?Yes ASCE 7-10, Section 7.4 Slope Factor Figure:Figure 7-2b ASCE 7-10, Section 7.4 Roof Slope Factor, Cs:0.79 ASCE 7-10, Figure 7-2 Sloped Roof Snow Load, ps [psf]:20 ASCE 7-10, Equation 7.4-1 Design Snow Load, S [psf]:20 1.00 25 Design material weight [psf] 2.2 1.1 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 3.3 #VALUE! Existing 25 5.0 23 30 C Fully Exposed 0.9 1.1 II 1.0 25 0 No Figure 7-2b JOB NO.:U3232.0221.201 SUBJECT:LOAD COMPARISON PROJECT:Baker Residence Summary of Loads Existing With PV Array D [psf]6 10 Lr [psf]20 20 S [psf]25 20 Maximum Gravity Loads: Existing With PV Array (D + Lr) / Cd [psf]21 24 ASCE 7-10, Section 2.4.1 (D + S) / Cd [psf]27 25 ASCE 7-10, Section 2.4.1 Maximum Gravity Load [psf]:27 25 Ratio Proposed Loading to Current Loading:94%OK (Cd = Load Duration Factor = 0.9 for D, 1.15 for S, and 1.25 for Lr) The gravity loads and; thus, the stresses of the structural elements, in the area of the solar array are either decreased or increased by no more than 5%. Therefore, the requirements of Section 807.4 of the 2015 IEBC as referenced in 780 CMR Chapter 34, 9th Edition are met and the structure is permitted to remain unaltered. VECTOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS JOB NO.:U3232.0221.201 SUBJECT:SOLAR LAYOUT PROJECT:Baker Residence