HomeMy WebLinkAboutTide information
Grant, Kelly
From:Healy, Kieran J. <khealy@bscgroup.com>
Sent:Wednesday, November 18, 2020 1:57 PM
To:Creighton, Matthew T.; Grant, Kelly
Cc:Raddatz, Hannah L.
Subject:RE: Yarmouth Fee with regard to Riverfront Multiplier
Hello Kelly – The Datum is NAVD-1988
For this area the conversion between 0.0 NAVD-1988 and MLW was (-2.2). For elevation 3.7 on MLW datum it would be
elevation 1.5 on NAVD-1988.
Please let me know if this answers your question
Regards Kieran
From: Creighton, Matthew T.
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 11:29 AM
To: Healy, Kieran J. <khealy@bscgroup.com>
Cc: Raddatz, Hannah L. <hraddatz@bscgroup.com>
Subject: FW: Yarmouth Fee with regard to Riverfront Multiplier
I assume we’re on 88? Whats the conversion for 3.7’ MLLW? Did we use the state program to determine the elevation?
From: Grant, Kelly \[mailto:KGrant@yarmouth.ma.us\]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 11:25 AM
To: Creighton, Matthew T. <mcreighton@bscgroup.com>; Raddatz, Hannah L. <hraddatz@bscgroup.com>
Subject: RE: Yarmouth Fee with regard to Riverfront Multiplier
Hi Matt
Thanks for clarifying - there are salt marsh species present, so you’re right, you won’t be using the worksheets. What
elevation are you using for the spring tide? The site suggests these are salt marsh species in an area inundated by a
spring tide. The last spring (king) tide was 3.7ft relative to MLLW and the next will be 3.1ft. I don’t see the datum on the
plan but assume NAVD88? How does this translate?
Thanks
Kelly Grant
Conservation Administrator
Town of Yarmouth
508-398-2231 Ext 1288
kgrant@yarmouth.ma.us
From: Creighton, Matthew T. \[mailto:mcreighton@bscgroup.com\]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 10:24 AM
To: Grant, Kelly <KGrant@yarmouth.ma.us>; Raddatz, Hannah L. <hraddatz@bscgroup.com>
Subject: RE: Yarmouth Fee with regard to Riverfront Multiplier
1
Hi Kelly,
Are you looking at saltmarsh species or BVW? Salt Marsh is delineated by vegetation and spring tide. Anything landward
of spring tide is not be definition SM so it would have to meet the standards for BVW. We would only do field data
sheets for BVW.
Best,
Matt
From: Grant, Kelly \[mailto:KGrant@yarmouth.ma.us\]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 8:58 AM
To: Raddatz, Hannah L. <hraddatz@bscgroup.com>
Cc: Creighton, Matthew T. <mcreighton@bscgroup.com>
Subject: RE: Yarmouth Fee with regard to Riverfront Multiplier
Hi Hannah
Yes, you are right most of the septic work is outside the RFA so that is fine.
I visited this site on Friday. Can I get the wetland delineation worksheets for this property. I noted a couple of wetland
species landward of the current salt marsh delineation.
Thanks
Kelly Grant
Conservation Administrator
Town of Yarmouth
508-398-2231 Ext 1288
kgrant@yarmouth.ma.us
From: Raddatz, Hannah L. \[mailto:hraddatz@bscgroup.com\]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 2:06 PM
To: Grant, Kelly <KGrant@yarmouth.ma.us>
Cc: Creighton, Matthew T. <mcreighton@bscgroup.com>
Subject: RE: Yarmouth Fee with regard to Riverfront Multiplier
Hey Kelly,
After consulting with Matt, I think the reason we did not include the RFA multiplier is because there is no proposed work
within RFA except for the pump, fill, and abandonment of septic components which will only require negligible,
temporary ground disturbance. No structures are proposed in RFA. Does that seem agreeable to you?
-Hannah
2
From: Raddatz, Hannah L.
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 1:51 PM
To: Grant, Kelly <KGrant@yarmouth.ma.us>
Cc: Creighton, Matthew T. <MCreighton@BSCGroup.com>
Subject: RE: Yarmouth Fee with regard to Riverfront Multiplier
Now that you bring that up I am realizing the same thing… We will reach out to the client and get checks for the town
and the state that make up the difference for the multiplier fee.
From: Grant, Kelly \[mailto:KGrant@yarmouth.ma.us\]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 1:33 PM
To: Raddatz, Hannah L. <hraddatz@bscgroup.com>
Cc: Creighton, Matthew T. <mcreighton@bscgroup.com>
Subject: RE: Yarmouth Fee with regard to Riverfront Multiplier
Hi Hannah
No, there is no multiplier under the bylaw. That reminds me – the NOI submitted last week for Charles St should have
the multiplier included under the state fees.
Kelly
From: Raddatz, Hannah L. \[mailto:hraddatz@bscgroup.com\]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 1:26 PM
To: Grant, Kelly <KGrant@yarmouth.ma.us>
Cc: Creighton, Matthew T. <mcreighton@bscgroup.com>
Subject: Yarmouth Fee with regard to Riverfront Multiplier
Attention! This email originates outside of the organization. Do not open attachments or click links unless you
are sure this email is from a known sender and you know the content is safe. Call the sender to verify if unsure.
Otherwise delete this email.
Hello Kelly,
I have two projects with work in RFA and for some reason I can’t recall if the local bylaw fees are also affected by the
RFA multiplier? Just wanted to double check with you first.
Best Regards,
Hannah
Hannah Raddatz | Wetland Scientist
BSC Group
349 Route 28, Unit D | West Yarmouth | MA 02673
direct | 617-896-4584
main | 508-778-8919
cell | 603-702-2428
3