HomeMy WebLinkAbout363 Whites Path DRC COMPLETE PACKET 061819Town of Yarmouth
Per M.G.L.: All town and school boards, committees, commissions, and authorities shall post a notice of
every meeting at least 48 hours prior to such meeting, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays.
Notice shall contain a listing of topics/agenda that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed at
the meeting.
Name of committee:
Date of Meeting
Notice of Meetings
Design Review Committee
June 18, 2019
I Time: 14:00 PM
Place:
Room B, lower level of Yarmouth Town Hall
1146 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MA
Agenda (Topics to be discussed):
1. Formal Design Review: Robert B. Our Company, 363 White's Path, South
Yarmouth, Assessor's Map 110, Parcel 9, Zoning Districts B3/APD. The Applicant is
proposing to convert an existing industrial factory bay into 2,560 square feet of
business office space and associated site work.
2. Adjournment.
Attachments:
Please note: The Design Review Committee meets as necessary. Copies of documents and other
exhibits listed here may be found in the Department of Community Development at Yarmouth Town Hall,
1146 Route 28, South Yarmouth.
YARMOUTH TOWN CLERK
$9JON14Pmi2:50 RE6
Review is: ❑ Conceptual R Formal
❑ Binding (404 MotelsNCOD/R.O.A.D. Project) 17 Non-binding (All other commercial projects)
Review is by: ❑ Planning Board x❑ Design Review Committee YARMOUTH TOWN CLERK
DES/GN REV/EW COMMENT SHEET '19,IILIN20P 9:00 REC
Meeting Date: June 18, 2019 Map: 110 Lots: 9
Applicant: Robert B. Our Company Zone(s): B3/APD
Site Location: 363 White's Path, South Yarmouth, MA 02664
Persons Present:
DCR Members Present Yarmouth Town Staff Present Guests
Charlie Adams Kathy Williams Abby Our
Dick Martin Alison Alessi
Sara Porter
DRC Review for this project started at: 4:03 PM in Room B
DRC Review ended at: 4:52 PM
On a motion by Sara Porter, seconded by Charlie Adams, the Design Review Committee (DRC) voted (3-0) to
adjourn the June 18, 2019 DRC meeting at 4:52 PM.
Proiect Summary
General Description: The Applicant is proposing to convert an existing industrial factory bay into 2,560 square feet
of business office space. Some site improvements have been shown to add greenery to the front of the building.
Summary of Presentation: Alison Alessi, Architect, gave a brief overview of the project. The existing building is
relatively non-descript, and are working to turn it into office space. Only finishing a portion of the existing building.
Office space would be for Robert B. Our staff. The large overhead door on the northern elevation will be filled with
glass to get some light to make for a more pleasant work environment. The front will include signage, updated lighting
and a small pergola roof. The west elevation, facing the side, will have some new windows for natural light.
Conceptual site plan added some greenery in the front. Want to keep the space behind and around available for
industrial sized trucks. Abby Our noted that the property is heavily used and they need to maintain curb cuts for larger
trailers.
DRC Questions & Discussions:
Dick Martin expressed concerns about the parking in the front without buffers.
Charlie asked about the parking. Can parking on adjacent spaces be used for this property. Abby Our noted that it is
all in the same ownership.
Sara Porter asked about the types of trucks accessing the rear of the property. Sarah noted that moving the gate
further to the west would provide for parking against the west wall.
Dick Martin noted that he would like to see the parking behind the gate and make more green space in the front.
Charlie noted having built up planting boxes so wouldn't impact the asphalt or utilities.
Dick Martin noted that the building would be much more attractive with the proposed improvements. Site is very non-
conforming related to buffers/plantings that would be required now. Kathy Williams noted that increasing parking due
to change in use could trigger site upgrades. Will need to coordinate with the Building Commissioner. The newer
buildings along White's Path have done a lot of nice site improvements, so dressing up the front and moving the
parking to the side would be much appreciated.
Charlie noted that a second egress would help with insurance. Charlie inquired about lighting. Alison noted the
gooseneck lighting on the front of the building and need lighting at the doors for emergency egress.
Sara inquired about the colors. The building will be gray and the windows will have black frames. Suggested cleaning
up the electrical meter service to the building. Suggested reconsidering the parking location to the side.
Abby Our noted that they need the pavement in the front for trucks to park and pick-up materials.
Charlie asked about the location of the dumpster, which is located in the back.
Review Comments In Relation To The Design Standards
SITING STRATEGIES
Sect. 1. Streetscape ❑ N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or ❑x Discrepancies:
The entire front Streetscape is currently paved with no remaining greenery. The Applicant has shown some
greenery in the front to help define the Streetscape but this is located within the road right-of-way (ROW) and
trees cannot be planted in the ROW or over utilities.
Sect. 2, Tenant Spaces 19 N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect. 3, Define Street Edge ❑ N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies:
See Comments to Sect 1, Streetscape above
Sect. 4, Shield Large Buildings ❑x N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect. 5, Design a 2nd Story ❑ N/Ax❑ Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect. 6, Use Topo to Screen New Development 19 N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect. 7, Landscape Buffers/Screening ❑ N/A ❑ Meets Standards, orx❑ Discrepancies:
DRC suggested moving the required parking to the westerly side of the building and green-scape as much as
possible the front of the property, including a few trees.
Sect. 8, Parking Lot Visibility ❑ N/A ❑x Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Meets the standard if move parking to west side of building and screening it with additional front buffering.
Show parking area for the office staff to meet zoning requirements. If leave spaces in the front, it does not
meet the standard.
Sect. 9. Break up Large Parking Lots ❑D N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect. 10, Locate Utilities Underground ❑ N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or 17 Discrepancies:
Overhead utilities are shown as remaining.
Sect. 11, Shield Loading Areas 19 N/A 0 Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies:
BUILDING STRATEGIES: This project is a renovation to an existing building and includes minor
modifications to add windows and entrances to the new office space.
Sect. 1, Break Down Building Mass — Multiple Bldqs. ON/A ❑ Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect. 2, Break Down Building Mass — Sub -Masses ❑ N/A ❑x Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect. 3, Vary Fagade Lines ❑ N/A ❑ Meets Standards, orx❑ Discrepancies:
Although there are limited fagade changes in the existing industrial building, the variations in the roof lines
and heights provide interest to the building lines. The pergola also adds depth and interest to the office area.
Sect. 4, Vary Wall Heights ❑ N/A ❑x Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect. 5, Vary Roof Lines ❑ N/A Z Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect. 6, Bring Down Building Edges ❑ N/A ❑x Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect. 7, Vary Building Mat'ls For Depth ❑ N/A ❑x Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect. 8, Use Traditional & Nat'l. Building Mat'ls ❑ N/A 0 Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
DRC supported extending the proposed fiber cement siding to the entire front fagade.
Sect. 9, Incorporate Pedestrian -scaled Features ❑ N/A x❑ Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
The pergola over front fagade adds a pedestrian scaled feature.
Sect. 10, Incorporate Enerqv-efficient Design ❑ N/A I@ Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Next step for applicant: ❑ Go to Site Plan Review ❑ Return to Design Review for Formal Review
On a motion by Sarah Porter, seconded by Charlie Adams, the Design Review Committee (DRC) voted (3-0) to
approve these DRC Comments as meeting minutes for June 18, 2019 for the proposed office conversion at
363 White's Path South Yarmouth.
Received by Applicant(s)
ATTAC
• June 18, 2019 Agenda
• Aerial Photos — current view and 2017 view
• Building Photos
• DRC Application:
o Design Review Application and Materials Specification Sheet
o Site Concept Plan — no title block or date provided
o Architectural Plans: 11x17 Plans: All architectural plans prepared by A3 Architects, Inc,
dated June 18, 2019:
■ A-1 — First Floor Plan
■ A-2 — Second Floor Plan
■ A-3 — Elevations Section
• Supplemental information provided at the DRC Meeting:
o Anderson Window Cut -sheets
363 Whites Path
Write a description for your map.
$ 4
� T*
• 1 1 �.� f Y
FA
w
� TY
Legend
363 W h
j Feature
} wr
••i__-N��■■
r
ratf
1 1
363 Whites Path 2617
Write a description for your map.
Legend
363 Whites Path
Feature 1
U
t
$' }
RW -
363�White
363 Whites Path
Write a description for your map.
7egendtWkites Path
ure 1
Google Earth
5.44 ft
Town of Yarmouth
Design Review
Application
Date: ob 1 L I k6
OwnerApplicant's Phone:
or • # •
Property (Project) ° •• .rte P
Assessor's Map/lot
Zoning District(S): Flood Zone: 14
Engineer/Surveyor: W' Aw T<: tA r, L
Arc: hitect:Sp N S C..
Project C3escription:
�Awdl�
Applicant
Wf ' j abate;.
Provide color chips and or materia! samples where nec°essarY.
Project
Siding Type & Material(s):
Roof Material & Pitch(es):
Windows. 0 Wood Other (specify)
Doors: 0 Wood Cather (specify)
Trim Size;:: Windows & boors i � r corner Boards N I
Soffits RakesA, Fascia..,.._"
1�3
Trim Material: 0 Wood 0 Other (sped)
Shutters: Wood/Vi nyl/Othe r -Pane led/Louve red k '
Gutters: 0 Wood 0 Other (specify)-
Garage floors. Material; Size; Style
Becks And Railings: 0 Wood 0 Other (specify)
Fencing; 0 Wood 0 Other (specify) Size:
(Show Layout And Running Footage On Site Plan)
Retaining Wall(s): Pressure Treated/Fieldstone/Other14
(Show layout And Running Footage On Site Plan) ,
Signs: (Show On Plan) Size; Style p h4 VJL,01,1`470`
Additional' Information:
l
..
;. J�Ltf*—
..
Color(s):
.=
Andersen
ARCHITECTURAL.
C0LLECT10N
A -SERIES
WINDOWS & DOORS
Casement Windows
Andersen" A -Series casement windows are our hest performing casement windows. They're available with all of our energy-efficient
glass options, and their exteriors are virtually maintenance -free. With so many options to choose from, start designing yours today.
10111;L1:111114
• Virtually maintenance -free
• Exterior finish never needs painting and won't flake, rat, blister, peel or corrode'
• Exteriors are protected by a FlbreO material and fiberglass for long-lasting' performance
ENERGY-EFFICIENT
• Weather -resistant construction for greater comfort and energy efficiency
■ Variety of High -Performance Low- E41 glass options available to help control heating and
cooling costs in any climate
• Many A -Series casement windows have options that make them ENERGY STAR* v. 6.0
certified throughout the U.S.
f T4_Ir Biffiq
• Eleven exterior color options and a variety of interior options
• Extensive hardware selection, grilles, between -the -glass art glass and patterned glass options
WPA, anders&wWKurs.carrywarranfy for d(loih.
-ENERGY STAR' rsa reentered trademark of the LI,S. Lrmramwnlal I'ra[ecuon Agency.
A—SERIES THE ARCHITECTURAL COLLECTION
OPTIONS & ACCESSORIES
• Variety of energy-efficient glass options
• Patterned glass options
• Exclusive art glass designs that are placed
between glass panels
• Available with Stormwatch° protection for
coastal areas
• Variety of grille styles and sizes
• Wide variety of hardware styles
and finishes
• Exterior trim options
INTERIOR OPTIONS
Wood Species
Pine Maple
Vertical Grain
Douglas Fir
Interior Finishes & Painted Options
Clear Coat Honey
Cinnamon
Canvas Sandtone
Dark Bronze
EXTERIOR COLORS
White Canvas Dove Gray Sandtone Prairie Grass Red Rock
Forest Green Black Dark Bronze Cocoa Bean Terratone
TRIM STYLE OPTIONS
r (io
Flat trim with Flat trim with Brick mould Flat trim with Flat trim with Flat trim with
extended head flush head decorative 2" cornice 3 5/8" cornice
drip cap
Oak Cherry Mahogany'
Shown on Pine. Available on Pine, Maple and Oak only.
Russet Mocha Espresso White
Black
HARDWARE STYLES & FINISHES
Contemporary Folding
Traditional Folding
Black I Bright Brass I Gold Dust Antique Brass I Black I Bright Brass
Oil Rubbed Bronze I Satin Nickel Brushed Chrome I Distressed Bronze I Distressed Nickel
Stone I White Gold Dust I Oil Rubbed Bronze I Polished Chrome
Satin Nickel I Stone I White
*Actual wood is sapele, a non -endangered species of mahogany, grown in Africa, with color
and characteristics of American mahoganies.
Printing limitations prevent exact duplication of colors and replication of finishes. See your
Andersen dealer for actual color and finish samples. Naturally occurring variations in grain,
color and texture of wood make each window one of a kind. All wood interiors are unfinished
unless a painted interior is specified.
"Andersen" and all other marks where denoted are trademarks of Andersen Corporation.
02017 Andersen Corporation. All rights reserved. SS_033 01/17
Antique
Brass
Oil Rubbed
Bronze
Distressed
Nickel
Birch Bark Primed (rowel"t)
Black
Polished
Chrome
Satin Nickel
Bright
Brass
Brushed
Chrome
Stone
Gold Dust
Distressed
Bronze
White
Andersen 'A
For more information, visit andersenwindows.com/a-series
For help finding an Andersen product or dealer near you, please call
us at 877.577.7655 or visit andersenwindows.com.
Arri L ro
':ter'
"` ��. y� tSE� �r /�'C� /"— � ��
UZI
AS -
FT
top
do w
gW AP 'M
do
as w i�4 M-
0"
000
owes _.4040"
wo
Wes
5Z -coo 0"
040
0.0
*oil IWO o"
i4le-ci SOIRAAA
. W No
AREA CALCULATIONS:
EXTG CONDITIONED SPACE:
1 ST FLOOR: 2560 SF"
2ND FLOOR - STORAGE: 1800 SF
TOTAL: 2560 SF t-IKS I rLK trHl-t
40'-9" X 58'-8"
O
LL
Z
O
— Q
_ Q 2
-i - ----I-
-- z Z) Q Q
Z) a 2:
O Ow=
uuuu (0 c) ED c) o >m
O = O
P BREAK ROOM w Lu
- -1 12'-0" x 13'-0" Q� Co r
O Q
PEI
v v v v = I TITLE:
M
FCOFFICE OFFICE 9'"X11
19'-6" X 11'-6' 9-6 X 11-3-6-3
PLANS
20'-9Y"101_0., 9'-9Y4" 6,_By , 12'-2%'
/ III E o
0 a
01 / NEW GLASS CURTAIN III `0 0 c
WALL SYSTEM IN
O EXISTING MASONRY III v �'o+
OPENING III \ a' Q OD t
co
N � V M o
A ENTRY/RECEPTION III � "
.
0 19'-0" 18'-0" 202
o
Vo
9-N
�z
A/I z U
o
�
A
I I •� W G
L
E
WW
F; �LL
Vo W
0
1 1ll
u
10'-1 o %,, 9'-10%" 9'-10�/a' 9' 10�/„ 4 6' 1 %a" o °
��G17j
� �4J °3
00 00 00 00
0
O M a
ADA BATH ADA BATH COPIE /
6'-0" x 8'-0" 6'-0" x 8'-0" STORA E Date:
Li6-0" x 8'- " EXTG 04.29.2019
vSD 05.03.2019
OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE O 0\ DESIGN 06.18.2019
9'-6" X 11'-3" 9'-6" X 11'-3" 9'-6" X 11'-3" 9'-6" X 11'-3" 16— ILI
B B B B
9'-5" 2'-1 REMOVE EXISTING BLOCK REMOVE EXISTING BLOCK 02
WALL FOR NEW WINDOWS WALL FOR NEW A 1
60'-4Y4" WINDOWS/DOOR _
1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Al 3/16"=l' -o'
SECOND FLR
SPACE
780 SF STORAGE O
LL
Z
O
06
Q 2
Z � d <
Ow=
> OD F— F-
0
O = O
w Lu
OFFICES/CONFERENCE Q M
ROOM BELOW
\ TITLE:
\\� PLANS
UP
o
£ N
--
I� °
co o
A v N d y
L O ^\ N N Q W U
MEZZANINE
A OPEN TO BELOW STORAGE W � I
�o� o
19'-0" X 40'-0" z
3
A
N �z
A
--\ Z s NEW GLASS CURTAIN o�
WALL SYSTEM IN /
EXISTING MASONRY
A OPENING
•� E C`
0
U E
OV
OFFICES BELOW
� oz=
,� 05
a� �o
oc ;P'-
Date:
EXTG 04.29.2019
SD 05.03.2019
DESIGN 06.18.2019
B B B B
REMOVE EXISTING BLOCK REMOVE EXISTING BLOCK
WALL FOR NEW WINDOWS WALL FOR NEW WINDOWS A-2
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A2 3/16^=I._o"
REPLACE EXISTING
W.C. SHINGLES 12
WITH NEW 16
SHINGLES
0
LL.
Z
EXISTING CONRETE P J12 0
BLOCK WALL TO BE 6
PAINTED
Q =
PROPOSEDQ Q
COMPOSITE z a 2:
PERGOLA AT O w =
FRONT ENTRY,
PAINTED O
D_ m M
W Lu
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
F11 NEW GOOSENECK Q O lD Q
STYLE LIGHTING M
AT FRONT ENTRY
E:I=Ll
TITLE:
z
NEW SIGNAGE ELEVATIONS
WITH LOGO
SECTION
NEW CURTAIN
I I I E = WALL SYSTEM AT
r EXISTING DOOR o
OPENING o °z
u
m
16,_0• o a v
L C L
N Q QD
p N c N p
i NORTH ELEVATION — STREET ELEVATION 2 SECTION c
—v0o
Vo
..N
Z
o�
EXISTING ASPHALT w
ROOF TO BE
REPLACED WITH
NEW ARCH. 0�
ASPHALT ROOF
0
V°
u
EXISTING CONRETE ° o
BLOCK WALL TO BE td
PAINTED i±
ado
Ll
PROPOSED
COMPOSITE Date:
PERGOLA AT
FRONT ENTRY, EXTG 04.29.2019
PAINTED SD 05.03.2019
PROPOSED DESIGN 06.18.2019
FIBERCEMENT
SIDING
NEW ANDERSEN
CASEMENT
WINDOWS
A-3
3 WEST ELEVATION — SIDE
A3 1/8"_i,_o"
MEZZANINE
CONFERENCE
ENTRY
OFFICE