Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJ5951 Dennis Yarmouth Middle School WE 2022-02-11Summary Report #37 February 14, 2022 Attn: Job No: 5951 Job Name:Dennis Yarmouth Middle School 296 Station Ave South Yarmouth, MA 02664 Permit No.:BLD-21-006153 TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING SW 12 Tech Circle, Natick, MA 01760 | (617) 938-3774 office | (617) 344-0478 fax Southern California New England Arizona Texas February 7, 2022 Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Performed structural masonry inspection for grout placement. Grout sample(s) obtained: (4) per set, (1) set(s), (4) total. See attached. The work observed was, to the best of Arsene's knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship. February 8, 2022 Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Performed observation of earthwork activities. No Samples Taken. See attached. The work observed was, to the best of Arsene's knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship. February 9, 2022 Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Performed concrete placement and sampling inspection. Concrete sample(s) obtained: (5) per set, (2) set(s), (10) total. See attached. Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with MA at the jobsite. Performed soils compaction testing. No Samples Taken. See attached. Enea Mushi reported to Nicholas Hull with PMA Consultants at the jobsite. Performed floor flatness and floor levelness inspection. See attached. Exception:Floor measurement did not meet local minimum per required specs 3.9 FINISHING FLOORS AND SLABS Specified overall values of flatness, F(F) 35; and of levelness, F(L) 25; with minimum local values of flatness, F(F) 24; and of levelness, F(L) 17; for slabs-on grade. Non-compliance conditions were brought to the attention of Mitch Miller with PMA. See attached Non Compliance Report. The work observed was, to the best of Arsene's, Enea's knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship, except as noted. TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING SW 12 Tech Circle, Natick, MA 01760 | (617) 938-3774 office | (617) 344-0478 fax Southern California New England Arizona Texas New York February 10, 2022 Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Performed structural masonry inspection for grout placement. Grout sample(s) obtained: (4) per set, (1) set(s), (4) total. See attached. Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Performed soils compaction testing. No Samples Taken. See attached. The work observed was, to the best of Arsene's knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship. February 11, 2022 Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Performed soils compaction testing. No Samples Taken. See attached. The work observed was, to the best of Arsene's knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship. Laboratory test results are enclosed if testing was done during the period covered by this report. Limitations: These inspections were performed in accordance with requirements, but please note this report shall not be relied upon by others, as acceptance or guarantee of the work. Even with diligent inspection techniques, the contractor is solely liable for defects or failures to adhere to the code. Reviewed by: Enea Mushi Project Manager 02-17-2022 Date Technical Contact: Bruce Tie, Engineering Manager (btie@fenaghengineering.com) Administrative Contact: Siobhain Willis (Swillis@fenaghengineering.com) cc:Fenagh PM – emushi@fenaghengineering.com (email) Fenagh Technical Reviewer – btie@fenaghengineering.com (email) TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Project No: 5951 Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School Project Location: 296 Station Ave, South Yarmouth, MA, 02664 Fenagh Representative: Arsene Ntwali Inspection Type: Masonry Grout Placement Pg. 1 of 1 February 7, 2022 Time In: 07:00 Time Out: 15:00 Weather: Partly Cloudy Temperature: 45°F Permit No. : BLD-21-006153 Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Observed placement of Grout, mix design #Spec Mix, 3000 PSI at 28 days, for the 12" CMU wall, high-lift height 6 courses. Cleanouts were used, cells are clean and acceptable. consolidated by mechanical vibration. wall(s) at Level 1 at gridlines P.1/b25-33. Set No.Slump (in.)Mix Temp (°F)Air Temp (°F)Location Qty. of Samples 1 N/A 57 45 P.1/b28 4 1 set of Grout Box(s) for a total of 4 samples Referenced Details: 1-4WET Fine Grout Mix. Additional Notes: Grout placed on CMU blocks on the South side of the gymnasium. Area of placement was enclosed and heated. Plans Dated: 06/25/2021 Conformance: The Work observed was, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship. Limitations: These inspections were performed in accordance with requirements, but please note this report shall not be relied upon by others, as acceptance or guarantee of the work. Even with diligent inspection techniques, the contractor is solely liable for defects or failures to adhere to the code. Information provided herein has not been reviewed by supervisory staff, therefore, should be considered preliminary and subject to change, unless signed by both inspector and engineer below. Reviewed by: Arsene Ntwali Inspector 02-07-2022 Date Jillian Kass Staff Engineer 02-08-2022 Date 12 Tech Circle, Natick, MA 01760 | (617) 938-3774 office | (617) 344-0478 fax Southern California New England Arizona Texas NYk TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Soils Observation FET Project #: 5951 Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School TAA #: NA Inspection Address: 296 Station Ave, South Yarmouth, MA, 02664 Fenagh Representative: Arsene Ntwali February 8, 2022 Time In: 07:00 Time Out: 15:00 Weather: Light Rain Temperature: 40°F Permit No. : BLD-21-006153 Plans Dated: 09/23/2021 Conformance: The Work observed was, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship. Limitations:These inspections were performed in accordance with requirements, but please note this report shall not be relied upon by others, as acceptance or guarantee of the work. Evenwith diligent inspection techniques, the contractor is solely liable for defects or failures to adhere to the code. Information provided herein has not been reviewed by supervisory staff,therefore, should be considered preliminary and subject to change, unless signed by both inspector and engineer below. Reviewed by: Arsene Ntwali Inspector 02-08-2022 Date Jillian Kass Staff Engineer 02-09-2022 Date 12 Tech Circle, Natick, MA 01760 | (617) 938-3774 office | (617) 344-0478 fax Southern California New England Arizona Texas New York Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Performed observation of earthwork activities. No samples taken. Additional Notes: Observed placement and compaction of stones in the auditorium: a8-11/W-V. Bedding sand was used to cover electric conduit. A plate compactor was used to compact the stone to the finish grade TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Project No: 5951 Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School Project Location: 296 Station Ave, South Yarmouth, MA, 02664 Fenagh Representative: Arsene Ntwali Inspection Type: Concrete Placement and Sampling Pg. 1 of 1 February 9, 2022 Time In: 07:00 Time Out: 11:00 Weather: Sunny Temperature: 34°F Permit No. : BLD-21-006153 Plans Dated: 08/26/2021 Conformance: The Work observed was, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship. Limitations:These inspections were performed in accordance with requirements, but please note this report shall not be relied upon by others, as acceptance or guarantee of the work. Evenwith diligent inspection techniques, the contractor is solely liable for defects or failures to adhere to the code. Information provided herein has not been reviewed by supervisory staff,therefore, should be considered preliminary and subject to change, unless signed by both inspector and engineer below. Reviewed by: Arsene Ntwali Inspector 02-09-2022 Date Jillian Kass Staff Engineer 02-10-2022 Date 12 Tech Circle, Natick, MA 01760 | (617) 938-3774 office | (617) 344-0478 fax Southern California New England Arizona Texas New York Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Observed placement of and performed sampling of concrete for Level 1, slab on grade at K-L/b20-21, M.5-Q/a18-30 (mix no. 3000DNA, design strength of 3000 psi at 28 days, specified slump from 5 to 9 in., specified air content from 0% to 3%, and 99 cubic yards placed). Monitored loads for mix no., slump, temp., and time limit. Prepared 4x8" cylinder test specimens sampled from Pump truck. Set No. Slump (in.) Mix Temp. (°F) Air Temp. (°F) Air Content (%) Unit Weight (pcf) Truck No.Location Qty. of Samples Batch Time Sample Time Subcontractor Ticket No. 1 7.5 65 34 1.7 148.4 56 K/b20 5 6:47 AM 7:44 AM Silverback 3344 5 2 7.0 64 34 1.9 148.8 63 N.4/a24 5 7:40 AM 8:33 AM Silverback 2319 0 10 Total Additional Notes: Referenced Details: Mix Design 3000 DNA-3/4 Design Concrete TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Soils Compaction FET Project #: 5951 Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School TAA #: NA Inspection Address: 296 Station Ave, South Yarmouth, MA, 02664 Fenagh Representative: Arsene Ntwali February 9, 2022 Time In: 11:00 Time Out: 15:00 Weather: Sunny Temperature: 32°F Permit No. : BLD-21-006153 Plans Dated: 09/23/2021 Conformance: The Work observed was, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship. Limitations:These inspections were performed in accordance with requirements, but please note this report shall not be relied upon by others, as acceptance or guarantee of the work. Evenwith diligent inspection techniques, the contractor is solely liable for defects or failures to adhere to the code. Information provided herein has not been reviewed by supervisory staff,therefore, should be considered preliminary and subject to change, unless signed by both inspector and engineer below. Reviewed by: Arsene Ntwali Inspector 02-09-2022 Date Jillian Kass Staff Engineer 02-10-2022 Date 12 Tech Circle, Natick, MA 01760 | (617) 938-3774 office | (617) 344-0478 fax Southern California New England Arizona Texas New York Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Performed soils compaction testing. Equipment used was Plate compactor , Excavator. No samples taken. Density Std (DS): 2510 Moisture Std (MS): 482 Specified Compaction: 95% Soils Report prepared by: Fenagh Engineering Source of Fill: Native: General Location of Fill: Track field Nuclear Gauge: Humbolt HS-5001EZ 5200 calibration expiration date 02/2022 Soils Report Dated: 06-07-2021 Results Reported to: Mitch Miller Equipment Observed: Compaction: Plate compactor Excavation: Excavator Description of material Reference CurveID Lab Log ID Max Dry Density(pcf) Optimum Moisture Loose glacial 1 S774 115.8 10.0 Test# Test Location Probe Depth (in) Test Elev. (ft) Ref. Curve Used Test Dry Density (lbs/cu. ft.) Test Moisture (%) Compaction (95%) (%) Comments 1 Track field 6 26.5 1 110.2 7.0 95 Pass 2 Track field 6 27.5 1 111.7 6.9 96 Pass TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Project No: 5951 Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School Project Location: 296 Station Ave, South Yarmouth, MA, 02664 Fenagh Representative: Enea Mushi Inspection Type: Floor Flatness and Floor Levelness Pg. 1 of 1 February 9, 2022 Time In: 14:00 Time Out: 16:00 Time In: 16:00 Time Out: 20:00 Time In: 20:00 Time Out: 21:30 Weather: Sunny Temperature: 40°F Permit No. : BLD-21-006153 Plans Dated: 01/19/2021 Conformance: The Work observed was, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship, except as noted. Limitations:These inspections were performed in accordance with requirements, but please note this report shall not be relied upon by others, as acceptance or guarantee of the work. Evenwith diligent inspection techniques, the contractor is solely liable for defects or failures to adhere to the code. Information provided herein has not been reviewed by supervisory staff,therefore, should be considered preliminary and subject to change, unless signed by both inspector and engineer below. Reviewed by: Enea Mushi Inspector 02-09-2022 Date Jillian Kass Staff Engineer 02-15-2022 Date 12 Tech Circle, Natick, MA 01760 | (617) 938-3774 office | (617) 344-0478 fax Southern California New England Arizona Texas New York Enea Mushi reported to Nicholas Hull with PMA Consultants at the jobsite. Performed floor flatness and floor levelness testing on Slab on Grade on Level 1 at M.5-Q/A18-A30 placed on 02-09-2022, per ASTM E1155-96 (2008) specifications. Floor flatness (FF) requirement: 35; floor flatness (FF) local minimum requirement: 24; and floor levelness (FL) requirement: 25. FF measurements met local minimum requirements. FL measurements did not met local minimum requirements. Exception(s): Floor measurement did not meet local minimum per required specs 3.9 FINISHING FLOORS AND SLABS Specified overall values of flatness, F(F) 35; and of levelness, F(L) 25; with minimum local values of flatness, F(F) 24; and of levelness, F(L) 17; for slabs-on grade Non-compliance conditions were brought to the attention of Mitch Miller with PMA Consultant x TESTING x INSPECTION x ENGINEERING 12 Tech Circle, Natick, MA 01760 | (617) 938-3774 office | (617) 344-0478 fax 9070 Center Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 | (909) 587-6374 office 54-21 73rd Place, Maspeth, NY 11378 | (516) 423-3428 office 13707 Cimarron Avenue, Suite B, Gardena, CA 90249 | (424) 270-9791 office February 9, 2022 PMA Consultants Attn: Mitch Miller 296 Station Ave South Yarmouth MA 02664 Job No.: 5951 Job Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School Permit #: BLD-21-006253 Dear Mr. Miller, In accordance with your authorization, floor flatness tests were performed on the Slab on metal deck, Ground Floor Part B, Line M.5-Q, Row a18-Pass a30, for the concrete placement on February 9, 2022. An Allen Face and Company D-Meter Model 1610, S/N 0324 was used. Measurements were performed in general accordance with ASTM E1155 – 2008 and Project Manual, Section 033000 Cast-in-Place Concrete. Summary of the test performed is outlined below Overall Location Ground Level– Part B Section (Approximate grid lines) Line M.5-Q, Row a18-Pass a30 Date Measured February 9, 2022 Measured Section Area 5,853.4 sq. ft. Type of Run Selection Perpendicular Measured FF 33.6 Measured FL 16.7 The measured FF and FL for this placement is 33.6 and 16.7 Attached are the sketches of runs measured, project summary and section summaries. If you have any inquiries or require additional information, please contact our office. ______________________________________________ Enea Mushi Senior Project Manager x TESTING x INSPECTION x ENGINEERING 12 Tech Circle, Natick, MA 01760 | (617) 938-3774 office | (617) 344-0478 fax 9070 Center Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 | (909) 587-6374 office 54-21 73rd Place, Maspeth, NY 11378 | (516) 787-3333 office 13707 Cimarron Avenue, Suite B, Gardena, CA 90249 | (424) 270-9791 office TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Project No: 5951 Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School Project Location: 296 Station Ave, South Yarmouth, MA, 02664 Fenagh Representative: Arsene Ntwali Inspection Type: Masonry Grout Placement Pg. 1 of 1 February 10, 2022 Time In: 07:00 Time Out: 10:00 Weather: Sunny Temperature: 47°F Permit No. : BLD-21-006153 Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Observed placement of Grout, mix design #Spec Mix, 3000 PSI at 28 days, for the 12" CMU wall, high-lift height 6 courses. Cleanouts were used, cells are clean and acceptable. consolidated by mechanical vibration. wall(s) at Level 1 at gridlines N-N.7/b33, K-L.5/b33, J.7/b25-29. Set No.Slump (in.)Mix Temp (°F)Air Temp (°F)Location Qty. of Samples 1 N/A 58 47 J.7/b27 4 1 set of Grout Box(s) for a total of 4 samples Referenced Details: 1-4WET Fine Grout Mix. Additional Notes: Grout placed on CMU blocks on the North and East side of the gymnasium. Area of placement was enclosed and heated. Plans Dated: 06/25/2021 Conformance: The Work observed was, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship. Limitations: These inspections were performed in accordance with requirements, but please note this report shall not be relied upon by others, as acceptance or guarantee of the work. Even with diligent inspection techniques, the contractor is solely liable for defects or failures to adhere to the code. Information provided herein has not been reviewed by supervisory staff, therefore, should be considered preliminary and subject to change, unless signed by both inspector and engineer below. Reviewed by: Arsene Ntwali Inspector 02-10-2022 Date Jillian Kass Staff Engineer 02-14-2022 Date 12 Tech Circle, Natick, MA 01760 | (617) 938-3774 office | (617) 344-0478 fax Southern California New England Arizona Texas NYk TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Soils Compaction FET Project #: 5951 Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School TAA #: NA Inspection Address: 296 Station Ave, South Yarmouth, MA, 02664 Fenagh Representative: Arsene Ntwali February 10, 2022 Time In: 10:00 Time Out: 15:00 Weather: Sunny Temperature: 47°F Permit No. : BLD-21-006153 Plans Dated: 09/23/2021 Conformance: The Work observed was, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship. Limitations:These inspections were performed in accordance with requirements, but please note this report shall not be relied upon by others, as acceptance or guarantee of the work. Evenwith diligent inspection techniques, the contractor is solely liable for defects or failures to adhere to the code. Information provided herein has not been reviewed by supervisory staff,therefore, should be considered preliminary and subject to change, unless signed by both inspector and engineer below. Reviewed by: Arsene Ntwali Inspector 02-10-2022 Date Jillian Kass Staff Engineer 02-15-2022 Date 12 Tech Circle, Natick, MA 01760 | (617) 938-3774 office | (617) 344-0478 fax Southern California New England Arizona Texas New York Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Performed soils compaction testing. Equipment used was Plate compactor , Excavator. No samples taken. Density Std (DS): 2534 Moisture Std (MS): 486 Specified Compaction: 95% Soils Report prepared by: Fenagh Engineering Source of Fill: Native: General Location of Fill: Track field Nuclear Gauge: Humbolt HS-5001EZ 5200 calibration expiration date 02/2022 Soils Report Dated: 06-07-2021 Results Reported to: Mitch Miller Equipment Observed: Compaction: Plate compactor Excavation: Excavator Description of material Reference CurveID Lab Log ID Max Dry Density(pcf) Optimum Moisture Loose glacial 1 S774 115.8 10.0 Test# Test Location Probe Depth (in) Test Elev. (ft) Ref. Curve Used Test Dry Density (lbs/cu. ft.) Test Moisture (%) Compaction (95%) (%) Comments 1 Track field 6 25 1 111.1 6.5 96 Pass 2 Track field 6 26 1 110.8 6.3 96 Pass TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Soils Compaction FET Project #: 5951 Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School TAA #: NA Inspection Address: 296 Station Ave, South Yarmouth, MA, 02664 Fenagh Representative: Arsene Ntwali February 11, 2022 Time In: 07:00 Time Out: 15:00 Weather: Sunny Temperature: 50°F Permit No. : BLD-21-006153 Plans Dated: 09/23/2021 Conformance: The Work observed was, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable standards of workmanship. Limitations:These inspections were performed in accordance with requirements, but please note this report shall not be relied upon by others, as acceptance or guarantee of the work. Evenwith diligent inspection techniques, the contractor is solely liable for defects or failures to adhere to the code. Information provided herein has not been reviewed by supervisory staff,therefore, should be considered preliminary and subject to change, unless signed by both inspector and engineer below. Reviewed by: Arsene Ntwali Inspector 02-11-2022 Date Jillian Kass Staff Engineer 02-15-2022 Date 12 Tech Circle, Natick, MA 01760 | (617) 938-3774 office | (617) 344-0478 fax Southern California New England Arizona Texas New York Arsene Ntwali reported to Mitch Miller with PMA at the jobsite. Performed soils compaction testing. Equipment used was Wacker Neuson 6555 plate compactor, CAT 3242 , Rakers. No samples taken. Density Std (DS): 2541 Moisture Std (MS): 483 Specified Compaction: 95% Soils Report prepared by: Fenagh Engineering Source of Fill: Native: General Location of Fill: Track field East side Retaining wall Nuclear Gauge: Humbolt HS-5001EZ 5200 calibration expiration date 02/2022 Soils Report Dated: 06-07-2021 Results Reported to: Mitch Miller Equipment Observed: Compaction: Wacker Neuson 6555 plate compactor Excavation: CAT 3242 Description of material Reference CurveID Lab Log ID Max Dry Density(pcf) Optimum Moisture Loose glacial 1 S774 115.8 10.0 Test# Test Location Probe Depth (in) Test Elev. (ft) Ref. Curve Used Test Dry Density (lbs/cu. ft.) Test Moisture (%) Compaction (95%) (%) Comments 1 Track field 6 26 1 111.0 5.5 96 Pass 2 Track field 6 26 1 110.3 5.7 95 Pass EZ/η ĂƚĞ >ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ /ŶƐƉĞĐƚŽƌ /ƐƐƵĞZ&/ͬ^ƵďŵŝƚƚĂůEŽ͘ZĞƐŽůǀĞĚ͍;zͬEͿ ^ƵďͬŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌ ĂƚĞZĞƐŽůǀĞĚ ŽŵŵĞŶƚϭ ϳͬϮϭͬϮϬϮϭ tĂůů͗ͬĚϯ ƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱйz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϭϬͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϭ͕ϴϲϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϯϭͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсϮ͕ϴϬϬƉƐŝ^ĞƚϭсϮ͕ϵϬϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϴϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJĂǀĞƌĂŐĞсϯ͕ϬϲϬƉƐŝϮ ϳͬϮϴͬϮϬϮϭ &ŽŽƚŝŶŐ͗ϭϲͬ ƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱй͗>Ăď>ŽŐEŽ͗͘ϭϱϱϭϵ;ϮϳϰϰͲϮϳϰϱͿz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϯϭͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϯϱϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϱϬϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϲϮϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϮϮͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсƉƐŝϯ ϳͬϯϬͬϮϬϮϭ&ŽŽƚŝŶŐƐ^Ğƚηϭ͗ŽůƵŵŶůŝŶĞͬZŽǁ͗͘ϯͬĐϭϭϲ^ĞƚηϮŽůƵŵŵůŝŶĞͬZŽǁĐϱͬ,ƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱйz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϮϳͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϬϳϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϯϯϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϯϬƉƐŝ^ĞƚϮсϯ͕ϯϯϬƉƐŝ^ĞƚϮсϯ͕ϱϮϬƉƐŝ^ĞƚϮсϯ͕ϱϴϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϮϰͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚηϭсϯ͕ϳϮϬƉƐŝ^ĞƚηϮсϯ͕ϲϳϬƉƐŝϰ ϴͬϯͬϮϬϮϭ&ŽŽƚŝŶŐƐ͗ůĞǀĂƚŽƌƉŝƚĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱйz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϭϬͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсϮ͕ϲϭϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϯϭͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϭϳϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϵͬϮϴͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϯϯϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϵϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϳϬϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJĂǀĞƌĂŐĞƐĞƚϭсϯ͕ϱϭϬƉƐŝϱ ϴͬϲͬϮϬϮϭ>ĞǀĞůϭtĂůůĂƚƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂŶĚͲͬĐϮƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱйz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϭϯͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсϮ͕ϵϴϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϯͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϭϳϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϬͬϴͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϮϯϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϬϬƉƐŝϲ ϴͬϲͬϮϬϮϭ>ĞǀĞůϭtĂůůĂƚƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂŶĚͲ:͘ϳͬďϮϱƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱйz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϭϯͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϮсϮ͕ϯϵϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϯͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϮсϯϯϴϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϬͬϴͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсƉƐŝϳ ϴͬϭϯͬϮϬϮϭ>ĞǀĞůϭ&ŽŽƚŝŶŐƐĂƚƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͗W͘ϭͬďϯϯƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱйz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϭϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϯϬͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϬϵϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϭϬͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϲϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϱϭϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϬͬϬϴͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсƉƐŝ^ĞƚϭсƉƐŝϴ ϴͬϭϯͬϮϬϮϭ>ĞǀĞůϭ&ŽŽƚŝŶŐƐĂƚƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͗:͘ϯͬďϮϰƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱйz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϮϬͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсϮ͕ϯϮϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϭϬͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсϮ͕ϴϰϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϬͬϬϴͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсƉƐŝ^ĞƚϭсƉƐŝ ϵ ϴͬϮϬͬϮϬϮϭ>ĞǀĞůϭ&ŽŽƚŝŶŐƐĂƚ&ŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ͗tĂůů͗,ͬĐϱƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱй͗>Ăď>ŽŐEŽ͗͘ϭϱϴϲϬ;ϯϬϮϰͿz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϮϳͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсϮ͕ϴϭϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϭϳͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϰϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϱϬϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϬͬϭϱͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϵϮϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϰ͕ϬϮϬƉƐŝϭϬ ϵͬϯͬϮϬϮϭ >ĞǀĞůϭtĂůů͖hͬĂϱ ƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱй͖>Ăď>ŽŐEŽ͗͘ϭϲϬϲϳ;ϯϭϮϯͿz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϭϬͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсϮ͕ϬϱϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϬͬϬϭͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϭϬϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϬͬϮϵͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϱϭϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϲϯϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϲϲϬƉƐŝϭϭ ϵͬϵͬϮϬϮϭ >ĞǀĞůϭ&ŽŽƚŝŶŐ͗D͘ϱͬďϭϳ ƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱй͖>Ăď>ŽŐEŽ͗͘ϭϲϭϯϮ;ϯϭϳϱͿz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϭϲͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсϮ͕ϰϬϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϬͬϬϳͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϴϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϵϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϭͬϬϰͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϰ͕ϬϱϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϰ͕ϮϰϬƉƐŝϭϮ ϵͬϭϬͬϮϬϮϭ >ĞǀĞůϭ&ŽŽƚŝŶŐ͗>͘ϵͬďϮ ƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱй͖>Ăď>ŽŐEŽ͗͘ϭϲϭϯϯ;ϯϭϳϲͿz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϭϳͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсϮ͕ϯϯϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϬͬϬϴͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϱϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϱϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϵϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϭͬϬϱͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϰ͕ϬϲϬƉƐŝϭϯ ϴͬϭϯͬϮϬϮϭ>ĞǀĞůϭ&ŽŽƚŝŶŐƐĂƚƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͗^ĞƚηϭW͘ϭͬďϯϯ^ĞƚηϮ:͘ϯͬďϮϰƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱй͖>Ăď>ŽŐEŽ͗͘ϭϱϳϰϱ;ϮϵϰϱͲϮϵϰϲͿz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϮϬͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϮсϮ͕ϯϮϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϭϬͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϲϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϱϭϬƉƐŝ^ĞƚϮсϮ͕ϴϰϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϬͬϬϴͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϳϲϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϴϱϬƉƐŝ^ĞƚϮсϯ͕ϮϲϬƉƐŝ^ĞƚϮсϯ͕ϬϯϬƉƐŝ^ĞƚϮсϯ͕ϭϱϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚ Ϯсϯ͕ϮϲϬ ƉƐŝϭϰ ϴͬϭϳͬϮϬϮϭ>ĞǀĞůϭ&ŽŽƚŝŶŐƐĂƚƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͗^͘ϭͬďϮϳƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϯϱϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϰƚŽϲŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰ͘ϱйƚŽϳ͘ϱй͖>Ăď>ŽŐEŽ͗͘ϭϱϳϰϱ;ϮϵϰϱͲϮϵϰϲͿz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϴͬϮϰͬϮϬϮϭ^ĞƚϭсϮ͕ϱϭϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϭϰͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϮϴϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϰϯϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϬͬϭϮͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϰ͕ϬϳϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϰ͕ϭϭϬƉƐŝϭϱ ϵͬϮϯͬϮϬϮϭ>ĞǀĞůϭ&ŽŽƚŝŶŐƐĂƚƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͗WϳͬĂϭϴƌƐĞŶĞEƚǁĂůŝ>ŽǁďƌĞĂŬ͗DŝdžĞƐŝŶŐϱϬϬϬ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϱ͕ϬϬϬƉƐŝĂƚϮϴĚĂLJƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƐůƵŵƉĨƌŽŵϱƚŽϴŝŶ͕͘ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚĂŝƌĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĨƌŽŵϰйƚŽϳй͖>Ăď>ŽŐEŽ͗͘ϭϲϮϴϴ;ϯϮϲϰͿz DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞϳĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϬϵͬϯϬͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϯ͕ϱϭϬƉƐŝϮϴĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϬͬϮϭͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϰ͕ϰϳϬƉƐŝϱϲĚĂLJďƌĞĂŬϭϭͬϭϴͬϮϬϮϭ^Ğƚϭсϰ͕ϴϴϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϱ͕ϭϮϬƉƐŝ^Ğƚϭсϱ͕ϮϭϬƉƐŝϭϲ ϭϭͬϮͬϮϬϮϭ>ĞǀĞůϭ^ůĂďĂƚƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͗>ŝŶĞͲϭ͕ZŽǁϭͲďĞĨŽƌĞϭϲŶĞĂDƵƐŚŝ DĞĂƐƵƌĞĚ&ůŽŽƌ&ůĂƚŶĞƐƐ͕>ĞǀĞůŶĞƐƐ;ϯϰ͘ϳĂŶĚϭϴ͘ϯͿĚŝĚŶŽƚŵĞĞƚŽǀĞƌĂůůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚ;ϯϱĂŶĚϮϱͿ E DĂƌŐƵĞƌŝƚĞdƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϮϭϮ͗ϱϯWDKZƚŽĚǀŝƐĞ 17 9/27/2021  Level 1 Wall at Q‐P.7/a18, a18‐24/WD17 : Sampled @ N.4/b5Arsene NtwaliLow break:                                                                                                                                                                                        Mix Desing 5000D, design strength of 5,000 psi at 28 days, specified slump from 5 to 8 in., specified air content from 4% to 7% ; Lab Log No.: 16339 (3323)Y MargueriteTuesday, January 18, 2022 12:53 PMEOR to Advise                          7 day break  10/04/2021                 Set 1 = 3,510 psi                        28 day break  10/25/2021               Set 1 = 4,170 psi                        56 day break 11/22/2021                Set 1 = 4,700 psi                        90 day break 12/26/2021                Set 1 =  psi                             Set 1 =  psi                             18 12/16/2021Level 1, area A               @ S.1‐S.5/b11 bottoms only:  Level 16                    @ K.9‐N/b33 steel girts: Level low roof/high roof      @ N.9‐K/b1, K/b1‐b22,L+P.7/a17‐b21, LP.7/a17+b21, V‐V.9/a15, W/a1‐a14, W‐V/a1, V/a1‐a2, V‐U/a2Tony ParadisWPSs not available for review for Stellar Steel Erectors or United Steel. Stellar Steel Used FCAW process in the 2F, 4F, 2G and 3G possitions. United Steel used the SMAW process in the 2F possition. rnWPQRs recieved for Stellar Steel Erectors show no welders qualified for FCAW welds in the 4F or 3G positions.N PMA EOR to Advise                          19 12/17/2021  top and bottom plates Tony ParadisContractor has failed to maintain 3/4" minimum distance from screw to edge of light gauge surfaces as called for in General Note 4 on SK‐3.N PMA EOR to Advise                          20 12/18/2021 Level 1 Metal pan stairs at Building DTony ParadisLow Break :                                                                                                                                                                                       Mix #: 4000DGRNA : Slump 5‐9 air 0‐3 Design Strength (psi): 4,000 @28 days : Lab Log No.: 17282 (3681)N PMAEOR to Advise                          7 day break  11/25/2021                 Set 1 = 2,060 psi                        28 day break  12/16/2021               Set 1 = 2,580 psi                        56 day break 01/13/2022                Set 1 = 3,220 psi                        90 day break 02/16/2022                Set 1 = psi                             Set 1 = psi                             21 12/21/2021 locations at building A and B Blake MullensThe items as listed herein have not been accomplished in accordance with the approved documents, plans and specifications: No. 10 screw missing at inside leg of track connections. Contractor to install inside leg no 10 screws with lift access. Pins at typical parapet detail within this area not spaced properly. Pins installed at random locations instead of 5 pins within top 2" and 4 pins within bottom 2".N PMA EOR to Advise                          22 1/10/2022 Level 1, gridlines P.1‐J.1/B.33Abdulwahab AbulgasemCMU blocks the Vertical #7 by 16” not reaching overlap requirements, and may getting conflict with other structures as going up.Y PMA 1/13/2022 EOR to Advise                          23 11/8/2021 Level 2 Salb on metal deck at Building C: E/C4 Arsene NtwaliLow Break :                                                                                                                                                                                       Mix #: 4000DGRNA : Slump 5‐9 air 0‐3 Design Strength (psi): 4,000 @28 days : Lab Log No.: 16995N PMAEOR to Advise                          7 day break  11/15/2021                 Set 1 = 2,880 psi                        28 day break  12/06/2021               Set 1 = 3,820 psi                        56 day break 01/03/2022                Set 1 = 4,160 psi                        Set 1 = 4,250 psi                        Set 1 = 4,300 psi                        24 12/2/2021   Building C : F‐G/C7‐9 Arsene NtwaliLow Break :                                                                                                                                                                                       Mix #: 3000DNA : Slump 5‐9 air 0‐3 Design Strength (psi): 3,000 @28 days : Lab Log No.: 17226 (3735)N PMAEOR to Advise                          7 day break  12/09/2021                 Set 1 = 1,290 psi                        28 day break  12/30/2021               Set 1 = 1,720 psi                        56 day break 01/27/2022                Set 1 = 1,780  psi                       90 day break 03/2/2022                 Set 1 =  psi                             25 1/19/20221‐P/A.10 Low roof mediacenter                      2‐P/A.12 Lowroof mediacenter                      3‐A5/W Foundation planARoney NakhoulCohesion/Adhesion of SFRM Applied to Structural Members failure: Fireproofing material is not adhering to the glue. Noted that material was wet to touch and 2 samples takenN PMA EOR to Advise                          26 11/16/2021 Building A : N/b20, A5/S  Arsene Ntwali Grout, low break: Design Strength (psi): 3,000 @28 days, Lab Log No.: 17087 (3651) Y PMA1/19/2021Page 13 of UNIT MASONRY 04 2000‐13 Notes: 28‐day compressive strength indicated, but not less than 2000 psiEOR to Advise                          7 day break  11/23/2021                 Set 1 = 2,300 psi                        28 day break  12/14/2021               Set 1 = 2,660 psi                        56 day break 01/11/2022                Set 1 = 3,300 psi                        Set 1 = 3,330 psi                         27 11/18/2021 Building A :T.1/A7  Arsene Ntwali Grout, low break: Design Strength (psi): 3,000 @28 days, Lab Log No.: 17119 (3678)Y PMA1/19/2021Page 13 of UNIT MASONRY 04 2000‐13 Notes: 28‐day compressive strength indicated, but not less than 2000 psiEOR to Advise                          7 day break  11/25/2021                 Set 1 = 1,830 psi                        28 day break  12/16/2021               Set 1 = 2,290 psi                        56 day break 01/13/2022                Set 1 = 2,450 psi                        90 day break 02/16/2022                Set 1 = 2,660  psi                       28 11/18/2021 Building D: T.1/A7 Arsene Ntwali Concrete, low break: Design Strength (psi): 4,000 @28 days, Lab Log No.: 17282 (3681) N PMAEOR to Advise                          7 day break  11/25/2021                 Set 1 = 2,060 psi                        28 day break  12/16/2021               Set 1 = 2,580 psi                        56 day break 01/13/2022                Set 1 = 3,220 psi                        90 day break 02/16/2022                Set 1 = 3,350  psi                       118 day break 03/16/2022 Set 1 =  psi                             29 11/22/2021 Building A : T.1/A6 Arsene Ntwali Concrete, low break: Design Strength (psi): 3,000 @28 days, Lab Log No.: 17197 (3728) N PMAEOR to Advise                          7 day break  11/29/2021                 Set 1 = 1,720  psi                       28 day break  12/20/2021               Set 1 = 2,310 psi                        56 day break 01/17/2022                Set 1 = 2,370 psi                        90 day break 02/20/2022                Set 1 =  psi                             Set 1 =  psi                             30 12/27/2021 Level 2, L‐K.8/b21‐b22 Eric Pitman  Grout, low break: Design Strength (psi): 2,500 @28 days: Lab Log No.: 17890 (4010) N PMAEOR to Advise                          32 day break  01/28/2022               Set 1 = 1,190 psi                        56 day break 02/21/2022                Set 1 =  psi                             Set 1 =  psi                             Set 1 =  psi                             31 2/9/2022 Grade on Level 1 at Line M.5‐Q, Row a18‐Pass a30Enea MushiFloor Levelness measurement did not meet project spec requirements.                                                                            3.9 FINISHING FLOORS AND SLABSSpecified overall values of flatness, F(F) 35; and of levelness, F(L) 25; with minimum local values of flatness, F(F) 24; and of levelness, F(L) 17; for slabs‐on gradeN PMA EOR to Advise                          32 1/12/2022 P.2‐B.30 ‐B‐32Bernard Connaughton Mortar low break: Design Strength (psi): 1,800 psi @ 28 days: Lab Log No.: 17776  N PMAEOR to Advise                7 day break  01/19/2022                 Set 1 = 1,060  psi                       Set 1 = 1,190  psi                       Set 1 = 1,250  psi                       28 day break  02/09/2021               Set 1 =1,400 psi                        56 day break 03/09/2022                Set 1 =  psi                             Status: Work‐in‐ProgressLegend:Status: ClosedStatus: Open TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Field Number: 6 Masonry Mortar Compression Test Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School Permit # : BLD-21-006153 Project No.:5951 Sampled by: Bernard Connaughton Report Date: 02/08/2022 Client: PMA Consultants, LLC Date of Sampling: 01/11/2022 Lab Log No.: 17775 Reviewed by: Edmychael Colon, Lab Manager 02/08/2022 Date ASTM Standards Used: Unless noted, material was sampled and tested in accordance with ASTM C172, C1019, C31, C143, C231, C470, C511, C1077, C1231,C1064, C138 and E4. Compressive strength tests per ASTM C39. Testing was performed by qualifed personnel in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, material testing consultants procedures and the above reference standards. This report is applicable only to the items listed herein. The test performed and in this report are not intended to be considered as any guarantee or warranty of suitability for service or fitness of use of itemstested and it should not be relied on as such. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited.Pg. 1 of 1 Information provided by Field Technician Mix #: Type S Supplier: Girard & Co. Contractor: Lighthouse Masonry, Inc. Set: 1 of 1 Truck #: N/A Design Strength (psi): 1,800 @28 days Ticket#: N/A Sample Material/Shape: ASTM C780 A7.6 Compressive Testing of Masonry Mortar (2x2)Type of Structure: Wall Location: Onsite Location for overall pour: Location when sampled: Gymnasium - East Elevation at Line P.2-M.3-b33 Concrete Quality Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Mix Temperature (ºF): 54 50-90 Slump (in.): N/A N/A Unit Wt (#cu ft): N/A Air Temperature (ºF): 18 >40 Air Content (%): N/A N/A Time Sampled: 9:20 AM Aggregate Size (in): N/A N/A Batch Time: 9:10 AM Time in Truck: 10 minutes <90 Mins Information supplied by Laboratory Technician Date Received: 01/20/2022 Technician that received: MN Test #Age of Test (Days)Date Technician Dimensions (inch) X-section Total Load (lbs)Strength (psi)Width Width Height Area (in²) A 7 01/18/2022 Luis Soto Soldevilla 1.98 1.99 2.02 3.94 2,933 740 psi B 7 01/18/2022 Luis Soto Soldevilla 1.99 1.98 1.99 3.94 2,499 630 psi C 7 01/18/2022 Luis Soto Soldevilla 1.99 1.98 1.99 3.94 3,048 770 psi D 28 02/08/2022 Luis Soto Soldevilla 1.99 1.99 2.00 3.96 3,308 840 psi E 56 03/08/2022 F 56 03/08/2022 FAILS TO MEET DESIGN STRENGTH 28 Day Avg.:840 Remarks: Frozen/Frost noticed upon arrival to lab. Low 7-Day average compression test results. TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Field Number: 4 Masonry Grout Compression Test Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School Permit # : BLD-21-006153 Project No.:5951 Sampled by: Bernard Connaughton Report Date: 02/09/2022 Client: PMA Consultants, LLC Date of Sampling: 01/12/2022 Lab Log No.: 17758 (3957) Reviewed by: Edmychael Colon, Lab Manager 02/09/2022 Date ASTM Standards Used: Unless noted, material was sampled and tested in accordance with ASTM C172, C1019, C31, C143, C231, C470, C511, C1077, C1231,C1064, C138 and E4. Compressive strength tests per ASTM C39. Testing was performed by qualifed personnel in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, material testing consultants procedures and the above reference standards. This report is applicable only to the items listed herein. The test performed and in this report are not intended to be considered as any guarantee or warranty of suitability for service or fitness of use of itemstested and it should not be relied on as such. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited.Pg. 1 of 1 Information provided by Field Technician Mix #: Supplier: Girard & Co. Contractor: Lighthouse Masonry, Inc. Set: 1 of 1 Truck #: Design Strength (psi): 3,000 @28 days Ticket#: Sample Material/Shape: ASTM C1019 Compressive Testing of Masonry Grout (Grout Box)Type of Structure: Wall Location: Onsite Location for overall pour: Location when sampled: Line P.2-b27-b33-M.3 Concrete Quality Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Mix Temperature (ºF): 70 50-90 Slump (in.): N/A Unit Wt (#cu ft): N/A Air Temperature (ºF): 38 >40 Air Content (%): N/A Time Sampled: Aggregate Size (in): N/A Batch Time: Time in Truck: <90 Mins <90 Mins Information supplied by Laboratory Technician Date Received: 01/20/2022 Technician that received: LS Test #Age of Test (Days)Date Technician Dimensions (inch) X-section Total Load (lbs)Strength (psi)Width Width Height Area (in²) A 7 01/19/2022 3.45 3.46 6.95 11.94 31,543 2,640 psi B 28 02/09/2022 Luis Soto Soldevilla 3.47 3.47 6.48 12.04 48,027 3,990 psi C 28 02/09/2022 Luis Soto Soldevilla 3.47 3.42 6.55 11.87 48,264 4,070 psi D 28 02/09/2022 Luis Soto Soldevilla 3.45 3.46 6.53 11.94 45,952 3,850 psi MEETS DESIGN STRENGTH 28 Day Avg.:3970 Remarks: Received Sample Condition: Acceptable and/or Satisfactory TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Field Number: 6 Masonry Mortar Compression Test Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School Permit # : BLD-21-006153 Project No.:5951 Sampled by: Bernard Connaughton Report Date: 02/09/2022 Client: PMA Consultants, LLC Date of Sampling: 01/12/2022 Lab Log No.: 17776 Reviewed by: Edmychael Colon, Lab Manager 02/09/2022 Date ASTM Standards Used: Unless noted, material was sampled and tested in accordance with ASTM C172, C1019, C31, C143, C231, C470, C511, C1077, C1231,C1064, C138 and E4. Compressive strength tests per ASTM C39. Testing was performed by qualifed personnel in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, material testing consultants procedures and the above reference standards. This report is applicable only to the items listed herein. The test performed and in this report are not intended to be considered as any guarantee or warranty of suitability for service or fitness of use of itemstested and it should not be relied on as such. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited.Pg. 1 of 1 Information provided by Field Technician Mix #: Type S Supplier: Girard & Co. Contractor: Lighthouse Masonry, Inc. Set: 1 of 1 Truck #: N/A Design Strength (psi): 1,800 @28 days Ticket#: N/A Sample Material/Shape: ASTM C780 A7.6 Compressive Testing of Masonry Mortar (2x2)Type of Structure: Wall Location: Onsite Location for overall pour: Location when sampled: Line P.2-b30-b32 Concrete Quality Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Mix Temperature (ºF): 50 50-90 Slump (in.): N/A N/A Unit Wt (#cu ft): N/A Air Temperature (ºF): 38 >40 Air Content (%): N/A N/A Time Sampled: 11:30 AM Aggregate Size (in): N/A N/A Batch Time: 11:15 AM Time in Truck: 15 minutes <90 Mins Information supplied by Laboratory Technician Date Received: 01/20/2022 Technician that received: MN Test #Age of Test (Days)Date Technician Dimensions (inch) X-section Total Load (lbs)Strength (psi)Width Width Height Area (in²) A 7 01/19/2022 Luis Soto Soldevilla 1.99 1.99 1.95 3.96 4,717 1,190 psi B 7 01/19/2022 Luis Soto Soldevilla 2.00 1.99 1.96 3.98 4,232 1,060 psi C 7 01/19/2022 Luis Soto Soldevilla 1.99 1.99 1.95 3.96 4,955 1,250 psi D 28 02/09/2022 Luis Soto Soldevilla 1.99 1.99 1.94 3.96 5,556 1,400 psi E 56 03/09/2022 F 56 03/09/2022 FAILS TO MEET DESIGN STRENGTH 28 Day Avg.:1400 Remarks: Received Sample Condition: Acceptable and/or Satisfactory TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Field Number: 4 Masonry Grout Compression Test Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School Permit # : BLD-21-006153 Project No.:5951 Sampled by: Arsene Ntwali Report Date: 02/09/2022 Client: PMA Consultants, LLC Date of Sampling: 02/02/2022 Lab Log No.: 18045 (4051) Reviewed by: Edmychael Colon, Lab Manager 02/09/2022 Date ASTM Standards Used: Unless noted, material was sampled and tested in accordance with ASTM C172, C1019, C31, C143, C231, C470, C511, C1077, C1231,C1064, C138 and E4. Compressive strength tests per ASTM C39. Testing was performed by qualifed personnel in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, material testing consultants procedures and the above reference standards. This report is applicable only to the items listed herein. The test performed and in this report are not intended to be considered as any guarantee or warranty of suitability for service or fitness of use of itemstested and it should not be relied on as such. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited.Pg. 1 of 1 Information provided by Field Technician Mix #: Spec Mix Supplier: Contractor: Set: 1 of 1 Truck #: Design Strength (psi): 3,000 @28 days Ticket#: Sample Material/Shape: ASTM C1019 Compressive Testing of Masonry Grout (Grout Box)Type of Structure: wall Location: Onsite Location for overall pour: Location when sampled: K-K.8/b33 Concrete Quality Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Mix Temperature (ºF): 56 50-90 Slump (in.): N/A N/A Unit Wt (#cu ft): N/A Air Temperature (ºF): 42 >40 Air Content (%): N/A Time Sampled: Aggregate Size (in): N/A Batch Time: Time in Truck: <90 Mins <90 Mins Information supplied by Laboratory Technician Date Received: 02/07/2022 Technician that received: MN Test #Age of Test (Days)Date Technician Dimensions (inch) X-section Total Load (lbs)Strength (psi)Width Width Height Area (in²) A 7 02/09/2022 Getnet Beyene 3.49 3.51 6.60 12.25 35,341 2,880 psi B 28 03/02/2022 C 28 03/02/2022 D 28 03/02/2022 7 Day Avg.:2880 Remarks: Received Sample Condition: Acceptable and/or Satisfactory TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Field Number: 5 Laboratory Compression Test (4x8) Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School Permit # : BLD-21-006153 Project No.:5951 Sampled by: Arsene Ntwali Report Date: 02/09/2022 Client: PMA Consultants, LLC Date of Sampling: 02/02/2022 Lab Log No.: 18068 (4057) Reviewed by: Edmychael Colon, Lab Manager 02/09/2022 Date ASTM Standards Used: Unless noted, material was sampled and tested in accordance with ASTM C172, C31, C143, C231, C470, C511, C1077, C1231,C1064, C138 and E4. Compressive strength tests per ASTM C39. Testing was performed by qualifed personnel in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, material testing consultants procedures and the above reference standards. This report is applicable only to the items listed herein. The test performed and in this report are not intended to be considered as any guarantee or warranty of suitability for service or fitness of use of itemstested and it should not be relied on as such. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited.Pg. 1 of 1 Information provided by Field Technician Mix #: 3000DNA Supplier: Cape Cod Mix Contractor: Silverback Set: 1 of 1 Truck #: 56 Design Strength (psi): 3,000 @28 days Ticket#: 23124 Sample Material/Shape: ASTM C39 Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (4x8)Type of Structure: Slab on Grade Location: Onsite Location for overall pour: Level 1 Slab on Grade at H-K/b15-16 Location when sampled: H/b16 Concrete Quality Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Mix Temperature (ºF): 66 50-90 Slump or Spread (in.): 6.75 N/A Unit Wt (#cu ft): 149.3 N/A Air Temperature (ºF): 42 >40 Air Content (%): 1.7 N/A Time Sampled: 7:40 AM Aggregate Size (in): 3/4 N/A Batch Time: 6:55 AM Time in Truck: 45 minutes <90 Mins Information supplied by Laboratory Technician Date Received: 02/09/2022 Technician that received: MN Test # Age of Test (Days) Date Technician Diameter Length Area (in²) Cure Loc Ultimate Load (lbs) Compressive Strength (psi) Type of Fracture A 7 02/09/2022 Max Nabulsi 4.00 8.00 12.57 Fld 36,445 2,900 psi Type 2 B 28 03/02/2022 4.00 8.00 12.57 Fld C 28 03/02/2022 4.00 8.00 12.57 Fld D 28 03/02/2022 4.00 8.00 12.57 Fld E H H 4.00 8.00 12.57 Fld 7 Day Avg.:2,900 psi Remarks: Received Sample Condition: Acceptable and/or Satisfactory TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Field Number: 4 Masonry Grout Compression Test Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School Permit # : BLD-21-006153 Project No.:5951 Sampled by: Bernard Connaughton Report Date: 02/11/2022 Client: PMA Consultants, LLC Date of Sampling: 01/14/2022 Lab Log No.: 17759 (3958) Reviewed by: Edmychael Colon, Lab Manager 02/11/2022 Date ASTM Standards Used: Unless noted, material was sampled and tested in accordance with ASTM C172, C1019, C31, C143, C231, C470, C511, C1077, C1231,C1064, C138 and E4. Compressive strength tests per ASTM C39. Testing was performed by qualifed personnel in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, material testing consultants procedures and the above reference standards. This report is applicable only to the items listed herein. The test performed and in this report are not intended to be considered as any guarantee or warranty of suitability for service or fitness of use of itemstested and it should not be relied on as such. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited.Pg. 1 of 1 Information provided by Field Technician Mix #: Supplier: Girard & Co. Contractor: Lighthouse Masonry, Inc. Set: 1 of 1 Truck #: N/A Design Strength (psi): 3,000 @28 days Ticket#: N/A Sample Material/Shape: ASTM C1019 Compressive Testing of Masonry Grout (Grout Box)Type of Structure: Wall Location: Onsite Location for overall pour: Location when sampled: Gymnasium at Line P.2-b32-b27 Concrete Quality Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Mix Temperature (ºF): 72 50-90 Slump (in.): N/A N/A Unit Wt (#cu ft): N/A Air Temperature (ºF): 45 >40 Air Content (%): N/A N/A Time Sampled: Aggregate Size (in): N/A N/A Batch Time: Time in Truck: <90 Mins <90 Mins Information supplied by Laboratory Technician Date Received: 01/20/2022 Technician that received: LS Test #Age of Test (Days)Date Technician Dimensions (inch) X-section Total Load (lbs)Strength (psi)Width Width Height Area (in²) A 7 01/21/2022 Luis Soto Soldevilla 3.44 3.44 6.38 11.83 31,251 2,640 psi B 28 02/11/2022 Max Nabulsi 3.44 3.45 6.40 11.87 47,954 4,040 psi C 28 02/11/2022 Max Nabulsi 3.39 3.40 6.33 11.53 52,229 4,530 psi D 28 02/11/2022 Max Nabulsi 3.42 3.45 6.14 11.80 46,974 3,980 psi MEETS DESIGN STRENGTH 28 Day Avg.:4180 Remarks: Received Sample Condition: Acceptable and/or Satisfactory TESTING INSPECTION ENGINEERING Field Number: 6 Masonry Mortar Compression Test Project Name: Dennis Yarmouth Middle School Permit # : BLD-21-006153 Project No.:5951 Sampled by: Arsene Ntwali Report Date: 02/11/2022 Client: PMA Consultants, LLC Date of Sampling: 02/04/2022 Lab Log No.: 18046 (4052) Reviewed by: Edmychael Colon, Lab Manager 02/11/2022 Date ASTM Standards Used: Unless noted, material was sampled and tested in accordance with ASTM C172, C1019, C31, C143, C231, C470, C511, C1077, C1231,C1064, C138 and E4. Compressive strength tests per ASTM C39. Testing was performed by qualifed personnel in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, material testing consultants procedures and the above reference standards. This report is applicable only to the items listed herein. The test performed and in this report are not intended to be considered as any guarantee or warranty of suitability for service or fitness of use of itemstested and it should not be relied on as such. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited.Pg. 1 of 1 Information provided by Field Technician Mix #: Supplier: Contractor: Set: 1 of 1 Truck #: Design Strength (psi): 1,800 @28 days Ticket#: Sample Material/Shape: ASTM C780 A7.6 Compressive Testing of Masonry Mortar (2x4)Type of Structure: wall Location: Onsite Location for overall pour: Location when sampled: P.1/b26-30 Concrete Quality Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Actual Req'ment Mix Temperature (ºF): 58 50-90 Slump (in.): N/A Unit Wt (#cu ft): N/A Air Temperature (ºF): 42 >40 Air Content (%): N/A Time Sampled: 11:02 AM Aggregate Size (in): N/A Batch Time: 10:44 AM Time in Truck: 18 minutes <90 Mins Information supplied by Laboratory Technician Date Received: 02/07/2022 Technician that received: MN Test #Age of Test (Days)Date Technician Dimensions (inch) X-section Total Load (lbs)Strength (psi)Width Width Height Area (in²) A 7 02/11/2022 Max Nabulsi 1.99 1.99 1.98 3.96 4,172 1,050 psi B 7 02/11/2022 Max Nabulsi 1.99 1.98 1.95 3.94 4,406 1,120 psi C 7 02/11/2022 Max Nabulsi 1.99 1.98 1.97 3.94 4,806 1,220 psi D 28 03/04/2022 E 28 03/04/2022 F 28 03/04/2022 7 Day Avg.:1130 Remarks: Received Sample Condition: Acceptable and/or Satisfactory