Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout22-A052 32 Whippoorwill Lane OKH Commission Appeal DecisionECEIVED)t D KING'S HIGHWAY REGIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION JUN 2 1 2022 P.O. Box 140, Barnstable, Massachusetts 02630-0140 Tel: 508-775-1766 YARMOUTH > KIN 'S HIGHWAY James Barry, Appellant/Applicant Vs. Decision for Appeal No. 2022-3_-. Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Committee for the Town of Yarmouth On Tuesday, June 14, 2022, at 1:30 P. M. the Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Commission, here in after called the Regional Commission, held a public hearing at the West Barnstable Fire Station Meeting Room, 2160 Meetinghouse Way (Route #149), West Barnstable, Massachusetts, on Appeal No. 2022-3 filed by James Barry, hereinafter after called the Appellant /Applicant, seeking reversal of the Town of Yarmouth Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Committee, herein after called the Yarmouth Town Committee, denial of a request for Certificate of Appropriateness (Application #22-A052) for the placement of twenty (20) black rooftop solar panels on the rear roof of a dwelling located at 32 Whippoorwill Lane, Yarmouth Port, Massachusetts and identified as being shown on Town Map 149 Lot 20. The Yarmouth Town Committee's decision was filled with the Yarmouth Town Clerk on Tuesday, May 10, 2022. The Appeal Petition was filed with the Regional Commission on Thursday, May 19, 2022, within the ten-day appeal period. Present at the public appeal hearing for the Regional Commission were Chairperson William E. Bohlin of Dennis; Member Robert Wilkins of Yarmouth; Member James Trabulsie of Brewster; Member Peter Williams of Sandwich; Member Elizabeth McCarthy of Barnstable; Member Ronald Mgrdichian of Orleans; and James R. Wilson, Commission Administrative Counsel. Present for the Appellant/Applicant were the solar company representative Abe Boyle of My Generation Energy, and James Barry, the Appellant/Applicant. Backeround Information: 1.) The Regional Commissioners had reviewed the Application with specifications, pictures, and diagrams showing the proposed location on the back roof for the 20 -rooftop solar panel array, the Yarmouth Town Committee's denial for being visible from Windswept Path, Abutter's List, Appeal Petition, and the video and approved Minutes of the May 9, 2022, Yarmouth Town Committee public hearing. 2.) The Regional Commissioners had individually visited the site and observed the view from 32 Whippoorwill Lane and Windswept Path of the proposed location for the solar panel array. Appellant/Applicant's Presentation: Abe Boyle of My Generation Energy addressed the Regional Commissioners on behalf of the appeal. He presented picture images of the public's view from Windswept Path and suggested that the appearance of the solar panel array would be largely screened and hidden by vegetation and the existing 2 -story house with attached garage located at 23 Windswept Path. He claimed that the public's view of the rooftop solar panel array would be minimal. He alleged that the public streets in the area were isolated and remote with very little traffic. He suggested that the vehicle and pedestrian traffic would be looking at the marsh on the opposite side of Windswept Path. He concluded by inferring that the Yarmouth Town Committee had exercised poor judgment in denying the application and requesting that the Regional Commissioners reverse the Yarmouth Town Committee's determination to deny Application #22-A052. Yarmouth Town Committee's Presentation: Robert Wilkins of the Yarmouth Town Committee began his presentation by stating that the Yarmouth Town Committee had approved about eighty percent (80%) of the solar panel requests that had been presented for review. He claimed that the Yarmouth Town Committee supported the use of solar energy and had a good record of trying to work with homeowners and their agents to find a reasonable compromise for the approval of requested solar panel array projects within the historic district. He disputed the opinion that the Yarmouth Town Committee had made a mistake or exercised poor judgment in denying the application. Mr. Wilkins pointed out that the trees and shrubs in the area were mostly deciduous and suggested that during the winter months the rooftop solar panel array would be much more visible. He stated that there were no other visible rooftop solar arrays located within the neighborhood and expressed concern that the approval might become the basis for the future approval of more visible rooftop solar panel arrays. He concluded by indicating that the Yarmouth Town Committee's opinion to deny the project was based upon the scenic beauty of the neighborhood and the belief that the rooftop solar panel array would appear incongruent within the scenic setting. 2 Public Comment: Chairperson William E. Bohlin announced that the Regional Commission had not received any letters regarding the appeal, He requested public comment and there was none. Appellant/Applicants' Rebuttal & Conclusion: Abe Boyle acknowledged that the solar array would have limited public visibility from Windswept Path but repeated the claim that it would be located in a very remote part of the historic district and observed by a very small number of people. He reminded the Regional Commissioners of the need to address climate change and the importance of permitting homeowners to invest in the use of clean energy. Yarmouth Town Committee Rebuttal & Conclusion: Robert Wilkins summarized the points made in his presentation and repeated a concern for the protection of the scenic appearance of the residential neighborhood. Commissioner Trabulsie of Brewster asked if there were any photographs showing the level of screening of the public's view from Windswept Path before the seasonal leaves substantially obscured the view of the Appellant/Applicant's rear roof. Both Mr. Boyle and Mr. Wilkins indicated that they were not aware of any pictures of the rear roof taken at a different time of the year. Closure of Public Hearing: Chairperson Bohlin announced the closure of the public hearing and stated that the Regional Commissioners would attempt to decide the appeal. Regional Commission Discussion: Commissioner Mgridichian of Orleans began the discussion by expressing the opinion that observing the site he would have denied the placement of solar panels on the front of the house and approved the application as submitted for the rear of the house. He indicated that he felt that the application ought to have been approved. Commissioner Trabulsie of Brewster stated that he agreed with Mr. Mgridichian's opinion and suggested that he felt that the application for the rear roof location meets the criteria of having a "minimum visual impact on the surrounding neighborhood." Commissioner Williams of Sandwich indicated that he agreed with the comments of Mr. Mgridichian and Mr. Trbulsie and suggested that he believed that when the homeowner makes reasonable accommodations to conceal the solar panel array, the application ought to be approved. Commissioner McCarthy of Barnstable reported that her site visit observations from Windswept Path indicated that the rear roof was only barely visible from the Street. Chairperson Bohlin of Dennis stated that he was in complete agreement with the observations and comments of his fellow Regional Commissioners. He indicated that he believed that the determination by the Yarmouth Town Committee should be annulled and Certificate of Appropriate (22-A052) issued to the Appellant/Applicant. Administrative Counsel Wilson prepared and submitted a set of draft findings and motions for the Regional Commissioners to review and act upon. After review and minor editing, the following findings and motions were adopted by the Regional Commission as indicated: Commissioner Elizabeth McCarthy moved, seconded by Commissioner Trabulsie that the following findings of fact be approved and incorporated into the Regional Commission's decision. The motion was adopted by a vote of 5-0-1. (McCarthy, Trabulsie, Williams, Mgrdichian, & Bohlin, in favor; None, opposed; Wilkins, abstaining) The Regional Commission findings: 1. The project consists of a request to install twenty (20) black rooftop solar panel modules on the rear facing roof of the dwelling located at 32 Whippoorwill Lane, Yarmouth Port, Massachusetts and being shown on Town Map 149 as Lot 20. 2. The twenty (20) black solar panel modules located on the rear asphalt shingled roof of the dwelling will be partially visible from Windswept Path. 3. The partial visibility of the solar panel modules gives the Yarmouth Town Committee jurisdiction and the authority under the Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Act to determine the appropriateness of the appearance of the proposed rooftop solar panel array. 4. The remote location of the proposed area for the rear roof solar panel array and its limited public visibility will result in a minimum visual impact on the surrounding neighborhood. 5. The Yarmouth Town Committee exercised poor judgment in denying the submitted application for the proposed solar panel array. 6. The Yarmouth Town Committee decision denying approval of the proposed solar panel array should be annulled and a Certificate of Appropriateness issued for the application as submitted. Regional Commission's Determination: Commissioner Trabulsie moved seconded by Commissioner McCarthy, that the Regional Commission vote to annul the decision denying the Certificate of Appropriateness (22 - in A052) to James Barry for the installation of a twenty (20) black rooftop solar panel array on rear roof of a dwelling located at 32 Whippoorwill Lane, Yarmouth Port, Massachusetts, which is shown on Yarmouth Town Map 149 as Lot 20. It is hereby noted that we find that the Yarmouth Town Committee exercise poor judgment in denying the application and that the Certificate of Appropriateness (22-A052) is hereby issued to the Applicant and is specific to the setting under consideration. The motion carried by a vote of 5 - 0 - 1. (Trabulsie, McCarthy, Williams, Mgrichian, & Bohlin, in favor; None, opposed; Wilkins abstaining) Any person aggrieved by this decision has a right to appeal to the District Court Department, Barnstable Division, within 20 days of the filing of this decision with the Yarmouth Town Clerk. Dated: June 21, 2022 5 William E. Bohlin, Chairperson