HomeMy WebLinkAbout4989 61 Eldridge Rd Decision TC 12.12.22FILED WITH TO\\AI CLERK:
PETITION NO:
HEARING DATE:
PETTTIONER:
TOWN OF YARMOUTH
BOARD OF APPEALS
DECISION
December 12,2022
4989
December 8, 2022
John F. Moynihan and Erin K. Moynihan
PROPERTY:6l Eldridge Road, South Yarmouth, NlA, tlWa 63
Eldridge Road, South Yarmouth, MA
Map 33, Parcel 344.1
Zoning District: R-25
Title: Book 19553, Page 315
MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING: Chairman Steven DeYoung, Sean lgoe, Richard
Marfin, Jay Fraprie, and John Mantoni
Notice of the hearing has been given by sending notice thereof to the Petitioner and all those owners
of propety as required by law, and to the public by posting notice of the hearing and publishing in
The Cape Cod Times, the hearing opened and held on the date stated above.
The Petitioner seeks a Special Permit per $104.3.2(2) to increase ridge height ofpre-existing,
nonconforming structure to 28 feet. In the altemative, the applicant seeks a Variance fiom
$203.5 for side setback relief.
The Property is located in the R-25 Zoning District and is currently improved with a 1 % story
single family home built in approximately 1952. The property also has a shed and raised septic
leaching field located in the rear of the property. The lot contains 9000 square feet and 60 feet of
frontage on Eldridge Road. The Petitioners purchased the property in 2005, at which time it
consisted only of the 3O-foot by 24-foot Cape Cod style home, with one floor. That structure
meets the front, right side, and rear setbacks, but encroaches into the left side setback by 6.5 feet,
sitting 8.6 feet from that boundary. ln 2012, the Petitioner secured a building permit to allow the
construction of a 306 square foot one story addition to the right rear ofthe house, to allow more
space for a family room and kitchen expansion. ln2021, Petitioner secured another building
permit to construct a one story l2 x17 foot addition to house a master bathroom. That permit was
issued by right as the addition would be 8.6 feet fiom the boundary, which is the same distance
as the existing house. A{ler the addition was constructed, the structures sustained substantial
damage due to a fire in March of 2021 . Petitioners applied for a new building permit, but asked
to construct a second level over the original house, to be unfinished, but for future living space.
A building permit was issued in August of 2022, and construction commenced. with 90% of the
work done, the building department notified the owners on october 18,2022, that relieffrom
Section 104.3.2 would be required from the Zoning Board ofAppeals for the reason that a
portion ofthe second-floor addition was in the side setback. The Building Department did not
require the Moynihans to cease and desist their construction, but rather, allowed them to continue
construction at their own risk as long as an application was made to the Zoning Board of
Appeals.
The original house was 16.5 feet in height, and is now approximately 28 feet high. The second-
floor space is unfinished and will remain that way until the Moynihans decide to add that space
to the existing house, which will always remain as one single family dwelling. The lot coverage
is approximately 14.5%. The second floor which faces south, and encroaches into the side
setback, was designed with only I window on that side. There are also a number oftrees and
vegetation on that common boundary, which will still offer much privacy to the neighbor to the
south.
The Board found that the second-floor addition, although situated in the side setback, would not
be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than is the existing non-conforming
structure. In addition, the Petitioner sought and secured all needed permits fiom the Town of
Yarmouth prior to construction, and that no undue nuisance, hazard or congestion will be created
and that there will be no substantial harm to the established or fi.rture character of the
neighborhood or town. The Board found that the Applicants had clearly met all olthe
requirements of Zoning Bylaw Section 104.3.2(2) and that they were eligible for the issuance of
a Special Permit.
Accordingly, a motion was made by Mr. Igoe, seconded by Mr. Mantoni, to issue a Special
Permit as requested, without conditions. The members voted by roll-call vote as follows:
Mr. DeYoung
Mr. Igoe
Mr. Martin
Mr. Fraprie
Mr. Mantoni
Mr. DeYoung
Mr. Igoe
Mr. Martin
Mr. Fraprie
Mr. Mantoni
The petitioner requested to withdraw the Variance portion of the petition, without prejudice, as it
was the consensus ofthe Board that no such relief was needed.
A motion was made by Mr. Igoe, seconded by Mr. Martin, to withdraw the request for relief in
the form of a Variance. The members voted by roll-call vote as follows:
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE
No permit shall issue until 20 days from the filing of this decision with the Town Clerk. Appeals
from this decision shall be made pursuant to MGL c40A section l7 and must be filed within 20
days after filing of this notice/decision with the Town Clerk. Unless otherwise provided herein,
the Special Permit shall lapse ii a substantial use thereof has not begun within 24 months. (See
bylaw $103.2.5, MGL c40A g9)
F-e&=
Steven DeYoung, Chairman
CERTIFICATION OF TOWN CLERK
I, Mary A. Maslowski, Town Clerk, Town of Yarmouth, do hereby certib/ that 20 days have
elapsed since the filing with me ofthe above Board of Appeals Decision #4989 that no notice of
appeal of said Decision has been filed with me, or, if such appeal has been filed it has been
dismissed or denied. All appeals have been exhausted.
Mary A. Maslowski