HomeMy WebLinkAbout5005 1044 Route 28 Application Materials Updated 01.03.23APPLICATION FORFORMAL DESIGN REVIEWBlue SkY Towers III, LLC'a Delaware limited liability company,d/b/a BSTMA' LLCc/o Ricardo M. Sousao Esq.Prince Lobel TYe LLPOne International Place, Suite 3700Boston, MA 02110ApplicantProperty Location:1044 Route 28Yarmouth, MA 02664Assessor's Map 50, Lot 1"89.1Prepared by:Ricardo M. Sousa, Esq.Prince Lobel TYe LLPOne International Place, Suite 3700Boston, MA 02110Telephone : (617) 456-8123Facsimile: (617)456-8100December 30,2022'l
TABLE OF CONTENTSAPPLICATION FORFORMAL DESIGN REVIEWProperty located at:L044 Route 28Yarmouth , MA 02664Assessor's MaP 50, Lot 189.1Cover LetterSpecial Permit ApplicationSupporting StatementRequest for Waiver of Certain Submittal RequirementsPlansExisting and ProPosed CoverageRF Plots AT&TRF Plots T-MobilePhoto SimulationsDevelopment of Regional Impact DecisionDesign Review CommentsSite Plan Review CommentsSite Plan Review Applicant Responses to CommentsAlternative Site AnalYsisEnvironmental Sound AssessmentRF Study/EME RePofiTab 1Tab2Tab 3Tab 4Tab 5Tab 6Tab 7Tab 8Tab 9Tab 10Tab 1iTab 12Tab 13Tab 14Tab 15
Drainage MemoSight Line PlanAuthorization LetterTab 16Tab 17Tab 18
1
X PRINCE LOBELDecember 30,2022VIA ELNIC MAIL &EXPRESSIVERYTown of Yarmouth,ZoningBoard of AppealYarmouth Town Hall1146, Route 28Yarmouth, MA 02664Re:Property Address:Application for Special Permit1044 Route 28, Yarmouth, MA 02664Assessor's Map 50, Lot 189.1 (the "Property")Blue Sky Towers III, LLCd/b/a BSTMA III, LLC ("Blue Sky" or the "Applicant")Applicant:Dear Honorable Members of the ZoningBoard of Appeal:Enclosed, please find the following documents and supporting materials regarding Blue SkyTowers ttl, tLC's ("Blue Sky") application requesting a Special Permit theZoning Board ofAppeal for the Town of yarmouth (the "Board") for a proposed wireless communications facilityto be locate d at 1044 Route 28, Yarmouth, MA 02665, as further detailed herein. Blue Sky hascompleted both the design review and site plan review process' respectively.On behalf of Blue Sky, we appreciate your consideration. Should any member of theBoard have questions or should this application require additional information ormaterials please do not hesitate to contact me.Sincerely,K".-Til-Ricardo M. Sousa, Esq.Prince Lobel Tye LLPOne International Place, 3700Boston, MA 02110Direct: 617-456-8123Email : rsousa@princelobel. comPRINCE LOBEL TYE LLPOne lnternational Place, Suite 3700, Boston, MA 02110Office (617) 456-8000 Fax (617) 4s6-8100www.princelobel.comEnclosures
2
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HEARING APPLICATION (APPCAI INfOTMAtiON)Appeal#Hearing DateFee $Applicant is the (check one): Owner_ Tenant- Prospective Buyer- Other Interested Party-Applicant (full names, including d/b/a): Blue Sky Towers lll' LLc d/b/a BSTMA' LLCc/o Ricardo M. Sousa, Esq., Prince Lobel Tye, LLCOne lnternational Place, Suite 3700, Boston, MA 021 10Phone. (617) 456-8123Email:rsousa@pri ncelobel. comThis application relates to the property located at:AttorneyShown on the Assessor's MaP as:#50MapParcel #: 189.1aaaZoningDistrict: Business (82; Hotel/Motel Overlay District 1 (HMODI); Village CenterOverlay District (VC3)property located on un-constructed (paper) street? Provide nearest cross street name or other identifying location:project Summary (this information is used for the Legal Notice in the newspaper): Applicant seeks permission to(e.g.,adda10'byl5,decktothefrontofourhouse).Applicant seeks permission to construct amonopole communicatlonstower as further detallsherein.RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant seeks the following relief from the ZoningBoard of Appeals:licant seeks a Special Permit Pursuant to Section 103.2.2. and Section 408. of the Town'sZoning BylawsAppRTVERSE BUILDING INSPECTOR ORZONING ADMINISTRATOR DECISION (include a copy of thisdecision with this application). What is the decision date?:The reason for reversal and the ruling you request the Board to mahe:X SPECIAL PERMIT underand/or for a use authorized uPonYarmouth Zoning By-law Section :Special Permit in the "Use Regulation Schedule" Q202.5unications Facilitv and Reliqious lnstitutionComm_VARIANCE from the Yarmouth Zoning By-and, as to each section, speci! the reliefsought:ADDIT'IONAL INFORMATION (which you feel should be included in your application)law. Specify allsections of the by-law from which relief is requested,Section & Relief sought:Section & Relief soughlSection & Relief sought:Please see supplementalmaterials attached hereto.
zoNING BOARD OF',APPEALS HEARING APPLICATION (Property Information)Name & Address of Current Property Owner (if other than applicant) as listed on the Deed:Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall River, 1044 Route 28, Yarmouth, MA 02664Title Deed Reference (provide a copy of most recent Deed):#: Book 869; Page 144Book & Pageor Certificate #:aaaaLand Court Lot #Plan #:Use Classification:r Existing:$aProposed:202.5 # P2 Reliqlnstitution5202.s# F7 CommunicationsFacilitvIs the property vacant?: Yes_ No X Ifyes, how long has property been vacant?Lot InformationSizelArea: +l-4.4 acresPlan Book &Book 669;Paqe 144aaaLot1 8S.1Is this property within the Aquifer Protection Overlay District (APDX Yes- No-X-Have you completed a formal commercial site plan review (if needed)? Yes X No-Which other Boards and/or Town Departments are/have/will review this project? Whatis the status of review?Applicanthas undergone Formal DesignReview with the DesignReview Committee and Site Plan Reviewwith the Planninq BoardIs this a repetitive petition (re-application)? Yes-_ No x-If required, do you have Planning Board Approval? Yes X No-Has this property been the subject of prior relief from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes- No-If yes, pr-oviAe the date(s), Appeat number(s), decision(s), and other pertinent information with this application.N/A - Nozonino relief oranted relto the Aoolicant's reoor orooosed use.Building Commissioner Comments:Applicant / Attorney / Agent Signature::&-*F,rL*Property Owner Signature:Address:Phone:Email:Building CommissionerDate:
3
X PRINCE LOBELDecember 30,2022TVIA HAND DELIVERYITown of Yarmouth,ZoningBoard of AppealYarmouth Town Hall1146 Route 28Yarmouth, MA 02664RE:Property Address:Application for Special Permit1044 Route 28, Yarmouth, MA 02664Assessor's Map 50, Lot 189.1 (the "Property")Blue Sky Towers III, LLC,d/b/a BSTMA III, LLC ("Blue Sky" or the "Applicant")Applicant:Dear Honorable Members of the ZoningBoard of Appeal:This firm represents the Applicant in connection with an application for a special permit(the "special Permil") from the ZoningBoard of Appeal (the "Board") for the Town ofYarmouth (the "Town") in connection with the Applicant's proposed wirelesstelecommunications facility tower at the Property pursuant to the relevant portions of the Town'sZoningBylaw (the "Bylaw"). Blue Sky proposes to construct a one hundred and ten foot(110.0b') high stealth stye Communication Towerl (the "Tower"). The Applicant has enteredinto lease agreements with AT&T and T-Mobile whereupon completion of the construction ofthe Tower, AfAf and T-Mobile will install their respective antennas on the Tower as well asinstall appurtenant equipment at the base of the Tower for the operation of a Personal WirelessService Facility2 (the "Facitity"). The Facility will be surrounded by a six foot (6.00') highstockade fence, and will also be surrounded by a natural barrier of screening trees. The Facilityr Under the Town of yarmouth ZoningBylaw, Section V, a'oCommunication Tower" is defined as "[a]ny building,structure, pole, mast, tripod, monopole, or tower, free-standing or supported, or in association with a building orother permanent structure or equipment, utilized for the generating, transmitting, receiving, or detecting ofelectromagnetic radiation."2 Under the Town of yarmouth ZoningBylaw, Section V, a "Personal Wireless Service Facility" is defined as "[a]communications facility for the provision of personal wireless services, as defined by the Telecommunications Actof 1996." Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Section 70a@)Q)G)(ii), "the term 'personal wirelessservice facilities' means facilities for the provision of personal wireless services." Moreover, under theTelecommunications of l996,Section 70a(aX7)(C)(i), "the term 'personal wireless seryices' means commercialmobile services, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access seryices'"
X PRINCE LOBCLis described in greater detail on the plans submitted with this application, and incorporated hereinby reference (the'oPlans").The Property is owned by the Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall River and located in theBusiness 82 (*82"),Hotel/Motel Overlay District 2 ("HMODZ"), andthe Village CentersOverlay District 3 ("VC3"). Pursuant to Section 408.5 of the Town of Yarmouth ZoningBylaw(the "Bytaw"), all new Towers and Facilities in the Town require a Special Permit. AT&T andi-trrtoUit" cannot provide reliable wireless service to the Town based on their existing Facilitieswithin the Town, pursuant to the mandate of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and theirlicenses issued bythe Federal Communications Commission (the "FCC")' Therefore, theApplicant respectfully requests that this Board grant approval for the requested Special Permit asapplication described herein.By way of further background, the Applicant was granted Development of RegionalImpact approval by the Cape Cod Commission on January 13,2022, and the written decisionregarding the same is attached hereto as Exhibit 10. The Applicant subsequently filed anapplication for formal design review by the Town's Design Review Committee on June 14,iOZZ,resulting in the Design Review Comment Sheet attached hereto as Exhibit i 1 and filed anapplication foi site plan review with the Town's Site Plan Review Committee and received theSlte plan Review Comment Sheet dated July 19, 2022,which is attached hereto as Exhibit 12'I. BackgroundBlue Sky is in the business of constructing and opening communication towers in variousmarkets throughout the country, including the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Thecommunication towers are utilized by wireless carriers that are licensed by the FCC. AT&T andT-Mobile are licensed by the FCC to construct and operate wireless telecommunicationsnetworks in various markets throughout the country, including the Commonwealth ofMassachusetts and in particular the Town of Yarmouth. AT&T and T-Mobile are in the processof opening their telecommunications networks to provide seamless and reliable coveragethroughout the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.II. Radio Frequencv CoverageAT&T and T-Mobile have performed a study of radio frequency coverage for the Townand from the Property, AT&T and T-Mobile have determined that atelecommunications facilitylocated at the Property will provide necessary, adequate and reliable coverage to the targetedsections of the Town and the immediately surrounding area in AT&T and T-Mobile's proposedantennas are located at the requested height of ninety five feet (95.00') and one hundred and fivefeet (105.00'), respectively. In connection herewith, AT&T and T-Mobile have submitted radiofrequency propagution maps showing each camera's current coverage and showing theanticipated coverage from the proposed Facility.
X PRINCC LOBELilI.The Towerand FacilitvAs illustrated on the Plans, the Tower will be one hundred and ten feet (110.00') in height(the roof will extend to 115') and will be located within the 55' x 60' fenced compound withinthe 100' x 100' lease area. fenced compound lease area. The Tower has been designed as a clocktower for aesthetic purposes and this design will entirely conceal the various equipment andantennas. Within the fenced compound lease area, the Facility is surrounded by a tree line ofscreening trees which will be supplemental by additional landscaping trees as detailed in theplans. .AT&T'r panel antennas are proposed to be installed at a height of ninety five feet (95.00'centerline), and i-Mobile's panel antennas are proposed to be installed at a height of onehundred and five feet (105.00' centerline), with both AT&T and T-Mobile's appurtenanttelecommunications equipment to be located within the fenced compound. The antennas will beconnected via coaxial cables installed with AT&T and T-Mobile's respective appurtenantequipment at the base of the Tower. The Tower provides for collocation opportunities for two(2j other FCC licensed carriers at centerline heights of seventy four feet (69.00') and eighty fouri""t 1SS.OO'). Under current FCC regulations, the antennas are required to be separated by aminimum oitht"" feet (3.00'), and the antenna installations are required to maintain 10' ofvertical separation between installations'IV. Lesal ArgumentThe Applicant is entitled to the grant of the Special Permit because the Applicant'sproposed Facility complies with the criteria of Section 103.2.2 of the Bylaw:a) Section 103.2. Special Permits.1. 103.2.2. Criteria. Special permits shall not be granted unless the applicantdemonstrates that no undue nuisance, hazard or congestion will be createdand that there will be no substantial harm to the established or futurecharacter of the neighborhood or town. In addition, individual sections of theZoningBylaw contain supplemental special permit criteria for specific usesand types of develoPment.The Proposed Tower will provide critical wireless telecommunication coverage tothe Town while in no way creating an undue nuisance, hazard or congestion. TheApplicant has proposed a stealth design in the form of a clock tower to concealthe equipment and antennas and as a result, there will be no substantial harm tothe charicter of the neighborhood or Town. As further detailed herein, theApplicant and the Proposal meet the various requirements of the Bylaw and willpr&ia. benefits to the residents and businesses in Town in the form of improvedand reliable wireless coverage, including improved E. 911 capabilities.The Applicant is entitled to the grant of the Special Permit because the Applicant'sproposed Facility complies the intent of Section 408.4.1. of the Bylaw:
X PRINCE LOBELa) Section 408.4.1.1. The Board of Appeals may alter or waive one or more of the requirements ofsection 408 if it finds that the alteration or waiver of the requirement(s) witlnot derogate from the intent of the bylaw.The waivers requested by the Applicant as more fully detailed in the waiverrequest attached hereto which are administrative in nature and if granted will notderogate from the intent of the Bylaw but instead will ensure the same can beadhered to without undue expense to the Applicant and the Town.The Applicant is entitled to the grant of the Special Permit because the Applicant'sproposed Facility complies with the application filing requirements pursuant to Section408.6.2.5. of the Bylaw:a) Section 408.6.2. Location Filing Requirements.1. 408.6.2.5. If the application is for a Personal Wireless Service Facility a town-widemap showing other existing Personal Wireless Service Facility in the Town andoutside the Town within one mile of its corporate limits.The Applicant shall be in compliance with this provision of the Bylaw as evidenced by Exhibit 6attached hereto.The Applicant is entitled to the grant of the Special Permit because the Applicant'sproposed Facility complies the Design Requirements of Section 408.7 of the Bylaw:a) Section 408.7. Design.1. 408.7.1. General. All Communications Facilities shall be designedand sited so as to have the least adverse visual effect on theenvironment. OnIy self-supporting monopole type towers arepermissible. Lattice towers, or the use of ground anchors and/or guywireso are prohibited.All towers and antennas must meet or exceed current standards andregulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other agency of thefederal, state, and county government with the authority to regulatetowers and antennas. If such standards and regulations are changed,then the owners of the towers and/or antennas governed by thisordinance shall bring such towers and/or antennas into compliancewith such revised standard and regulations within six (6) months ofthe effective date of such standards and regulations unless a morestringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling federal
X PRINCE LOBELagency. Failure to bring towers and/or antennas into compliancewith such revised standards and regulations shall constitute groundsfor the removal of the tower or antenna at the owneros expense.The Applicant's proposed Facility shall be in compliance with this provision of theBylaw. Rs descriUed in more detail in the Plans and the resulting photo simulations, theApplicant is proposing a stealth tower in the form of a clock tower. This design was developedthroughout the Townt design review and site plan review process. The design originally startedu, u ^otropole style tower and through design review, developed to a stealth style clock tower tominimize visual impacts. Furthermore, both the Applicant and the wireless carriers installed andoperating on the Tower willfully comply with all applicable FCC and FAA regulations.2. 408.7.2. Location. No Communications Facility, antennao or towermay be located in the Town of Yarmouth except as noted in thisbylaw.The Applicant's proposed Facility shall be in compliance with this provision of theBylaw.3. 408.7.2.1. Allowed Areas.a)1. The siting of Personal wireless service Facilities shall beallowed in any zoning districto but is especially encouraged onexisting structures, where appropriate, and on sites shown on amap entitled 6(Town of Yarmouth Inventory of ExistingAntennas Sites and Possible Antenna Sitesrno as currentlyamended. This may be amended by Town Meeting action.As indicated and described in more detail in the Altemative Site Analysis and theSupplemental Alternative Site Analysis packages attached with this application, AT&T and T-ffrfoUite were unable to find an existing structure that would close the significant gap in wirelesscoverage. As a result, it was necessary to find, a"raw land" to site and construct a tower in orderto closJ the gap in coverage identified by both AT&T and T-Mobile. Upon careful analysis ofthe land in the Town, and keeping in mind the provisions of the Bylaw, the Property was the onlyidentified commercially or institutionally used lot in the areathat contained suffrcient land atea,satisfied lot coverage requirement, offered a vegetative screening and otherwise satisfied thecriteria listed in the Alternative Site Analysis package. Therefore, the Property is the onlyfeasible location for the proposed Facility because it is capable of supporting the necessaryfacilities to close AT&T and T-Mobile's significant gap in coverage.b) 2. communication antennas, buildings, or towers other thanthose for Personal wireless service Facilities (i.e., those notdefined in the Telecommunications Act of 1996) shall beallowedo by Special Permito only on sites shown on a map
X PRINCE LOBELentitled *Town of Yarmouth Inventory of Existing AntennaSites and Possible Antenna Sitesr" as currently amended'As indicated on the Alternative Site Analysis and the Supplemental Alternative siteAnalysis packages submitted and attached to this application, the Applicant analyzed potentialsites within the o'Town of Yarmouth Inventory of Existing Antenna Sites and Possible AntennaSites', for siting of its proposed Facility. The Property was determined to be the most suitableand only feasible locaiion for the proposed Facility that would successfully close the gap inwireless telecommunications services coverage.4. 408.7.3. Co-location. If feasible and appropriate, Personal WirelessService Facilities shall be located on existing structures, including butnot limited to buildings, water towerso existing communicationsFacilitieso utility poles and towerso and related facilitieso providedthat such installation preserves the character and integrity of thosestructures. In particular, applicants are urged to consider use ofexisting telephone and electric utility structures as sites for one ormore Personal Wireless Service Facilities. The applicant shall havethe burden of providing there are no existing structures upon whichit is feasible to locate.As indicated above and as described in the Alternative Site Analysis and theSupplemental Altemative Site Analysis packages submitted herewith, the Applicant studied,"rr"rut properties throughout the Town to determine the best siting location for its proposedFacility. Based on the "iit.tiu presented and described in the Alternative Site Analysis, it wasdetermined that the property was the most suitable and only feasible location and that siting theproposed Facility at the property would successfully close AT&T's and T-Mobile significant gapin "ou"rug". As such, the Applicant has satisfied its burden for providing evidence that there areno existing structures withinthe Town upon which are feasible for the Applicant to co-locate itsproposed Facility.5. 408.7.3.1. Licensed carriers shall share Personal Wireless ServiceFacilities and sites where feasible and appropriateo thereby reducingthe number of Personal Wireless Service Facilities that are stand-alone facilities. All applicants shall demonstrate a reasonable goodfaith effort to co-locate with other carriers. Such reasonable goodfaith effort includes: 1. A survey of existing structures that may befeasible sites for co-locating Personal Wireless Service facilities; 2.Contact with atl the other licensed carriers for commercial mobileradio services operating in the County, and; 3. Sharing informationnecessary to determine if co-location is feasible under the designconfiguration most accommodating to co-location.As previously stated, the Applicant has demonstrated a reasonable good faith effort to co-locate its pioposed Facility based on its Alternative Site Analysis and Supplement Alternative
X PRINCE LOBELSite Analysis submitted herewith. The Applicant's proposed Facility has potential to co-locateantenna installations for two (2) additional wireless telecommunications carriers, as shown onthe plans. As such, the Applicant's proposed Facility demonstrates that it has the feasibility toreduce the number of single-standing Personal Wireless Service Facilities to be developed in therown bv a'owin' ;.'"r";: i:::ffi;"::X-'* """u to be not reasib,e, awritten statement of the reasons for the infeasibility shall besubmitted to the Board of Appeals. The Board of Appeals mayretain a technical expert in the field of RF engineering to verify if co-location at the site is not feasible or is feasible given the designconfiguration most accommodating to co-location. The cost for sucha teclinical expert witl be at the expense of the applicant. The Boardof Appeals may deny a special Permit to an applicant that has notdemonstrated a reasonable good faith effort to provide for co-location.The Applicant has complied with this provision of the Bylaw through its submission ofits Altemative Site Analysis and Supplemental Alternative Site Analysis, and has demonstratedthat it made a good faith effort to study, analyze, and find existing Personal WirelessTelecommuniCations Facilities within the Town to co-locate on. The Applicant further herebyagrees to comply with the Board of Appeals through submission of its special permit applicationifadditional information is needed, including, the supply of such information to a technicalexpert hired by the Town. The Applicant Further states the proposal was reviewed by a technicalexpert (Isotrope) during the DRI application process before the Cape Cod Commission.7. 408.7.3.3. If the applicant does not intend to co-locate or to permitco-location, the Board of Appeals shall request drawings and studies,at the applicant's expense, which shown the ultimate appearance andoperation of the Personal Wireless Service Facility at full build-out.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility. TheApplicant is already planning for the co-location of AT&T's and T-Mobile's equipment at thefacitity, and the proposed Facility has the capacity to co-locate equipment for an additional two(2) wireless telecommunications carriers.8. 408.7.4. Historic Buildings and Districts.a) 1. Any Personal Wireless Service Facilities located on orwithin an historic structure shall not alter the character-defining features, distinctive construction methods, or originalhistoric materials of the building.
X PRINCE LOBELThis provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility. To theextent that the Board finds this provision applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility, theApplicant hereby agrees that it shall comply with this provision of the Bylaw.b) 2. Any alteration made to an historic structure toaccommodate a Communications Facility shall be fullyreversible.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.c) 3. Personal Wireless Service Facilities within the Old King'sHighway Regional Historic District shall be concealed withinor behind existing architectural featureso or shall be located sothat they are not discernable from public roads and viewingareas within the district.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.d) 4. The siting of Communications Facilities which are locatedin the Old King's Highway Regional Historic District requirethe additional approval of the appropriate authority.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.9. 408.7.5. Scenic Landscapes and Vistas.a) L. Personal Wireless service Facilities shall not be locatedwithin open areas that are discernable from public roads,recreational areas, or residential development.The Applicant's proposed Facility is not located within an open area, but will rather belocated in the unused forested lot located behind the church on the Property' Moreover, theApplicant's proposed Facility will be primarily covered by the Property's natural tree line andatso Uy u.rr-r*ing buffer comprised of proposed trees to be planted and maintained by theApplicant. A majority of the Tower compound will be covered behind the guise of theProperty's natural tree line. The proposed antennas and cable will be entirely concealed withinthe proposed clock tower.b) 2. Any Communications Facility that is located within 300 feetof a scenic road, as designated by the town, shall not exceed theheight of vegetation at the proposed location. If the facility islocated farther than 300 feet from the scenic road, the heightregulations described in 408.7.6.1 shall apply.
X PRINCE LOBELThe Applicant's proposed Facility is located along Route 28, which is not deemed ascenic road. furtherrnore, und ar indicated on the Plans, the proposed Facility is located gteaterthan three hundred feet (300.00') from Old Main Street (a designated scenic road). As such, thisprovision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility'c) 3. Personal Wireless service Facilities shall not be locatedwithin the viewshed as designated and located in the vcoD.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility'10. 408.7.6. Dimensional Requirements. All Communications Facilitiesshall comply with the dimensional and setback requirements ofBylaw section 203 (Intensity of Use Regulations).As indicated on the ZoningSummary on Sheet A-2 of the Plans, the Applicant'sproposed Facility complies with all dimensional and setback requirements of Section 203 of theBylaw.11.408.7.6.3. Ileighto Side- and Roof-Mounted Facilities. Side- androof-mounted Personal Wireless Facilities shall not project morethan ten feet (10') above the height of an existing building nor projectmore than ten feet above the height limit of the zoning district withinwhich the facility is located. Personal Wireless Service Facilities maylocate on a building that is legalty non-conforming with respect toheight, provided that the facilities do not project above the existingbuilding height.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.12. 408.7.6.4. Height, Existing Structures. New antennas located on anyof the following structures existing on the effective date of this bylawshall be exempt from the height restrictions of this bylaw providedthat there is no increase in height of the existing structure as a resultof the installation of a Communications Facility: guyed towers, Iatticetowers, and monoPoles.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.13. 408.7.6.5. Height, Existing structures, (utility). New antennaslocated on any of the following existing structures shall be exemptfrom the height restrictions of this bylaw provided that there is nomore than twenty foot (20') increase in the height of the existingstructure as a result of the installation of a Communication Facility:electric transmission and distribution towers, water towerso
X PRINCE LOBELtelephone poles and similar existing utility structures. Thisexemption shall not apply in the old King's Highway RegionalHistoric District, within 300 feet of the right-of-way of any scenicroadway.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility'14. 408.7.6.6. Microwave antennas exceeding 12 inches in diameter on aroof or building-mounted facility shall not exceed the height of thestructure to which they are attached, unless fully enclosed.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.lS. 408.7.7. Parking Requirements. All Communications Facilities mustmeet the parking and buffer requirements of Bylaw section 301"(Parking and Loading Requirements).As shown on the Plans, the Applicant's proposed Facility complies with this provision ofthe Bylaw. The existing parking lot located at the Property will serve as a means of access and"gr"r, to the driveway serving the Facility. The existing parking lot already includes a twentydot 1ZO.OO') wide buifer from the boundary of the Property abutting Route 28. Furthermore,there is a ten foot (10.00'), more or less, natural screening buffer between the existing parkingand the outer boundary oithe Facility. The Applicant proposes to plant trees within this ten foot(10.00') buffer zonetiatcomply with the requirements of Section 30L4.9 of the Bylaw. Thedriveway leading to the Faciliiy contains a vegetated buffer exceeding the required minimum often feet iro.oo'), and the vegetated buffer will be planted with trees that meet the requirements ofthe zoning Bylaw. Lastly, the single driveway serving the Facility is adequate to meet the needsof the ro.rtin" maintenante visits ut thr Facility, which will consist of approximately one vehiclemaking bi-weekly visits to the Facility. As such, the proposed Facility complies with thisprovision of the Bylaw.16. 408.7.8. Fall Zones. Communications towers, whether free-standingor part of another structure or building, must be set back from allproperty lines by at least the total height of the tower structure andits appurtenances.As shown on the Plans, the proposed Tower will be located a distance of one hundred andtwenty four feet (124.00') from the Property's boundary 1ine. As such, the Applicant's proposedFacility satisfies this requirement of the Bylaw.l7 . 408.7 .9 Aesthetics.408.7.9.1. Landscaping. Existing mature tree growth andnatural land forms on sites shall be preserved to the maximumextent possible. Screening for sites buffers and parking lotsa)
X PRINCE LOBELmust meet the criteria outlined in section 301 Parking andLoading. In additional, the base of communication towersshall be screened from view by a minimum four (4) foot wideplanting strip maintained with densety planted shrubs not lesslnan sii (6) feet in height. Shrubs shall be at least seventy-fivepercent (75%) evergreens. Fences or walls may be a part ofsuch screening where deemed necessary, as approved by theSite Plan Review Team. In locations where the visual impactof communications towers would not be an issueo theserequirements may be reduced or waived by the Buildingcommissioner upon unanimous vote by the Site Plan ReviewTeam.As shown on the Plans, the Applicant's proposed Facility will be primarily surrounded bythe property's existing natural tree tine. purtnermore, a natural screening buffer of planted treeswill belnstalled and maintained between the Facility's boundary line and the existing parking lotlocated on the property. As examined above, the natural screening buffer complies with theparking and Loading iequirements of the Bylaw. Moreover, the Applicant has proposed alandsciping plan described in detail on the Pians indicating the installation, maintenance andcare of the trees to be planted at the Facility. Additionally, the Facility will be enclosed by a sixfoot (6.00') stockade fence. Finally, the Siie Plan Review Team has reviewed and approved theplans. In ail, the Applicant's proposed Facility complies with this provision of the Bylaw'18.408.7.10. Color and Camouflage.408.7.10.1. Color. Communications towers and antennas shallmaintain a light gray or light blue finish, unless otherwiserequired by the Board of Appeals. Communication towersand/or antennas installed on an existing building or structureshall be camouflaged to match the building or structure towhich they are attached or the background against which theyare most commonly seen.The Applicant's proposed Facility shall comply with this provision of the Bylaw.b) 408.7.10.2. Camouflage by Existing Buildings or Structures:1. When a communications Facility extends above the roofheight of a building on which it is mounted, a reasonablegood faith effort shall be made to conceal the facilify withinor behind existing architectural features to limit itsvisibility from public ways. Facilities mounted on a roofshall be stepped back from the front fagade in order tolimit their impact on the buildingos silhouette.a)
X PRINCE LOBCLThis provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility2. Communications Facilities which are side mounted shallblend with the existing buildingos architecture and shall bepainted or shielded with material which is consistent withthe design features and materials of the building.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.c)408.7.10.3. Camouflage by Vegetation: If CommunicationsFacilities are not camouflaged from public viewing areas byexisting buildings or structures, they shall be surrounded bybuffers of dense tree growth and understory vegetation in alldirections to create an effective year-round visual buffer.Ground-mounted Personal wireless Service Facilities shallprovide a vegetated buffer of sufficient height and depth toeffectively screen the facility. Trees and vegetation may beexisting on the subject property or installed as part of theproposed facilify or a combination of both. The Board ofAppeals shall determine the types of trees and plant materialsand depth of needed buffer based on site conditions'As stated above and as shown on the landscaping plans described in the Plans, theApplicant's proposed Facility complies with this provision of the Bylaw. The Applicant herebyugr""r to nrrttrei comply with the Board of Appeals' recommsndations regarding the type anddepth of trees needed to maintain and on-site buffer.19. 408.7.11. Lighting and Signage.a)L. Communications Facilities shall be lighted only if requestedby the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Lighting ofequipment structure and any other facilities on site shall beshielded from abutting properties. There shall be a total cutoffof all tight at the property lines of the parcel to be developed,and footcandle measurements at the property line shall be 0.0initial foot candles when measured at grade.The Applicant hereby agrees to comply with this provision of the Bylaw. The proposedtower will not include a lightb) 2. Signs shall meet the design and display criteria of BylawSection 303.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility' Theonly sign that will be displayed at the Facility is a "No Parking" sign located at the start of the
X FRINCE LOBELdriveway leading to the Facility and small signs within the compound, as may be required by theFCC and not for advertising purposes.c) 3. All ground mounted communications Facilities shall besurrounded by a security barrier where appropriate andnecessary.The Applicant's proposed Facility complies with this provision of the Bylaw. As statedabove and as rlio*tr otr th. Flanr, the proposed Facility will be surrounded by a six foot (6.00')stockade fence which will be secured at all times. Only authorized personnel will have accessand egress through the fences.20.408.7.12. Equipment shelters. Equipment shelters forCommunications Facilities shall be designed consistence with one ofthe following design standards: 1.. Equipment shelters shall belocated in underground vaultsl or 2. Equipment shelters shall bedesigned consistence with traditional Cape Code architectural stylesand materials, with a roof pitch of at least l0ll2 and wood clapboardor shingle siding; or 3. Equipment shelters shall be camouflagedbehind an effective year-round landscape buffer, equal to the heightof the proposed shelter, and/or fence. The Board of Appeals (and/orthe Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Committee) shalldetermine the style of any fencing and landscape buffer that iscompatible with the neighborhood.The Applicant's proposed Facility complies with this provision of the Bylaw. As shownon the plans and specification material packages submitted herewith, the Facility's appurtenantequipment cabineis will be sheltered behind the two (2) six foot (6.00') stockade fencessunounding the property. Furthermore, the Property's natural tree line and a screening buffer ofnatural trees will also serve to shelter the Facility's equipment cabinets.21. 408.7 .13. Environmental Standards.a) 408.7.13.1. The location of any Communications Facility in ornear wetlands is subject to the Wetlands ProtectionRegulations of the Yarmouth Conservation Commission'This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.b) 408.7.13.2. The handling, storage, or disposal of hazardousmaterials is subject to Yarmouth Board of Health regulationsand, when applicable, Section 406 of this Bylaw.The Applicant hereby agrees to comply with this provision of the Bylaw.
X PRINCE LOBELc)40s.7.13.3. Ground-mounted equipment for Personal wirelessservice Facilities shall not, during normal operation, generatenoise in excess of 50 db (non-continuous) at the property line.agrees to comply with this provision of the Bylaw. The ApplicantThe Applicant herebyhereby submits the case study prepared bydatedd)408.7 .13.4. Roof-mountedor side-mounted equiPment forPersonal wireless Service Facilities shall not, during normaloperation, generate noise in excess of 50 db (non-continuous) atground level at the base of the building closest to the antenna.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.22. 408.7 .14. SafetY Standards.408.7 .14.1. Radio-frequency Radiation (RFR) Standards' Allequipment proposed for a communications Facility shall beauthorized per the FCC Guidelines for Evaluating theEnvironmental Effects of Radio-frequency Radiation (FCCGuidelines).a)As indicated in the RF Coverage study submitted herewith this application, theApplicant's proposed Facility and its appurtenant equipment complies with this provision of theeylaw. An nfn report prepared by Don Haes is submitted herewith and shows fulI compliancewith all applicable RFR set by the FCC.V. ConclusionThe Applicant hereby respectfully states that the Applicant's proposed Facility satisfiesthe requiremenis for the appiovai of the requested Special Permit. The Property is an appropriatelocation for the installation and operation of the proposed Facility and the proposal set forthherein represents the least intrusive and only feasible means through which the AT&T and T-Mobile can close the significant gap in reliable service coverage in the vicinity of the property.As demonstrated herein, the Proposed Facility meets the criteria of Section 103 .2.2. of the Bylawand, as such, the requested special permit should be granted and, further, the grant of any waiverrequested will not derogate from the intent of the Bylaw'For the foregoing reasons, the Applicant respectfully requests that the Board grantapproval for the requested Special Permit.SincerelY,Esq
X PRINCE LOBELDirect: 617-456-8123Email : rsousa@princelobel.com
4
X PRINCE LOBELDecember 30,2022VIA OVERNIGIIT DELIVERYTown of Yarmouth,ZoningBoard of AppealsYarmouth Town Hall1146 Route 28Yarmouth, MA 02664RE:Property AddressApplicant:Request to Waive Certain Special Permit Requirements1044 Route 28, Yarmouth,MA02664Assessor's Map 50, Parcel 189.1 (the "Property")Blue Sky Towers III, LLC,d/b/a BSTMA III, LLC ("Blue Sky" or the "Applicant")Dear Honorable Members of the ZoningBoard of Appeals:This firm represents the Applicant in connection with its application for the Special Permit byZoninggoaid of Appeal (the "Board") of the Town of Yarmouth (the'oTown") to permit thedevelolpment of the Applicant's proposed wireless telecommunications facility at the Property.The Applicant respectfully requests that the Board waive the following submittal requirementsset forih under Section 408.6 of the Town of YarmouthZoningBylaw (the "Bylaw"):1. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.7 .6.L: "Height, General. Regardless of thetype of mount, Pirsonal Wireless Service Facilities shall be no higher than ten feet abovetG urr.rug" height of buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility. PersonalWireless Service Facilities rnay locate on a building that is legally non-conforming withrespect to height, provided that the facilities do not project above the existing buildingheight." The proposed Tower will not exceed 200' - the Tower is proposed to be 110'(111' for top of ioof). The Applicant requests a waiver for height because there are notexisting structures of significant height to permit the FCC licensed cameras to fill theirsignificant gaps in coverage.2. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.7.6.2.: "Height, Ground-Mounted Facilities.Ground-mounted Personal Wireless Service Facilities shall not project higher than tenfeet above the average building height or, if there are no buildings within 300 feet, thesefacilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the tree canopy height, measuredfrom ground levelieCL). In no case may height exceed 200 feet above ground level."The pioposed Tower will not exceed 200' -the Tower is proposed to be 110' (115' fortop of roo0. The Applicant requests a waiver for height because there are not existing
X PRINCE LOBELstructures of significant height to permit the FCC licensed cameras to filItheir significantgaps in covorage.3. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.6.3.1.H.: "Distances, at grade, from theproposed Communications Facility to each building on the vicinity plan." The ApplicantLas included many of the distances to other buildings, however, the Applicant is notpermitted to enter adjacent properties.4. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.6.3.1 .I.: o'Contours at each two feet abovemean sea level for the subject property and adjacent properties within 300 feet."5. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.6.3.1.L.: "Lines representing the sight lineviewpoint (point from which view is taken) and visible point (point being viewed) from"Sight Lines" sub-section below." The Applicant will submit photo simulations after thecrane test and balloon test are conducted and the Applicant will supplement theapplication to the board.6. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.6.3.2.A.: "Sign line representation. A sightline representation shall be drawn from any public road within 300 feet and the closestfagade of each residential building (viewpoint) within 300 feet to the highest point(visible point) of the Communications Facility. Each sight line shall be depicted inprofile, dru*tr at one inch equals 40 feet. The profiles shall show all intervening treesand buildings. In the event there is only one (or more) residential building within 300feet there shall be at least two sight lines from the closest habitable structures or publicroads, if any." The Applicant will submit photo simulations after the crane test andballoon test are conducted and the Applicant will supplement the application to the board.7. Partial waiver of strict compliance with the requirement of Section 408.6'3.2.D.: ooVisualImpact. Photographic simulations from a distance of one hundred, one thousand, and fivethousand feet and from four different locations of approximately ninety degrees apart ofthe proposed Communication Facility." The Applicant will submit photo simulationsaftei the crane test and balloon test are conducted and the Applicant will supplement theapplication to the board.8. Waiver of strict compliance with the requirement of Section 408.6.3.3.D.: "Existing treesand shrubs at currentheight and proposed trees and shrubs at proposed height at the timeof installation, with approximate elevations dimensioned." The Applicant requests furtherdiscussion from the Board on the specific requirements of this provision of the Bylaw.g. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.6.3.3.E.: ooGrade changes, or cuts and fills, tobe shown as original grade and new grade line, with two-foot contours above mean sealevel."
X PRINCE LOBELThe Applicant respectfully requests the aforementioned waivers because those submittalrequirements are not applicabie to the Applicant's proposed project at the Property and thewaiver of the same by tire Board will not derogate from the intent of the Bylaw.Thank you for your attention to this matter.Sincerely,?*"f*-nicfdb M. Sousa, Esq.Prince Lobel Tye LLPOne International Place, Suite 3700Boston, MA 02110Direct: 617-456-8123Email : {sousa@princelobel. com
5
PreTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4Bullding A;HodleyBoy RoodSuite 200MA 01035Ph: (413)320-4S18CONSULIANTS:STAMP:JessePEDATE: 12/28//2022DRAWN: BLM/STZCHECK: JMM/TEJSCAtEi SEE PLANSHEET TITLE:TITI,E SHEWazo=UE0==EULMoolqoaEozt-=dUco5uozL=dooaUeazL=coo@Udozt-=doo@uEozL=ooatgzE&oUFoooNaEEEiHSEpb1HHHEEEE9>J7h=., HEg t5&t o<l FJoB NO.: 17-056T"l3452BLUE SIffoUJaIulEozIFF=ElJlo.DDTOWERS III, LLCSITE NAME: SOUTH YARMOUTHSITE NUMBER: MA-5104ADDRESS:'1044 ROUTE2SSOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664CO.APPLICANT INFORMATIONSITE NUMBER: 4HY06O4HlF..Mobile'T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLC15 COMMERCE WAYSUITE BNORTON, MA 02766ccBBAJ452CO.APPLICANT INFORMATIONgat&tSITE NUMBER: MA-5104NEW CINGULAR WRELESS PCS, LLC("Ar&T")550 COCHITUATE ROADFRAMINGHAM, MA 01701DRAWING INDEXSHEETDESCRIPTIONREVISIONT-1TITLE SHEET6c-1ABUTTERS PLAN & EXISTING CONDITIONS3A-1AERIAL & USGS [/APS6A-2COMPILID PLOT PLAN6A_iOVERALL SITE PLAN6A-4COI\4POUND PLAN & ELEVATION6PLANTING PLAN6A-6PROPERTY LINE OFFSET PLAN6SE- 1SITING ELEVATIONS6D-1DETAILS6cA-1 TO CA-4CO-APPLICANT DETAILS6EC-1EROSION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS6GENERAL NOTES1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS ANDCONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THEENGINEER & APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE IN WRITING OF DISCREPANCIESBEFORE PROCEEDING WTH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME.2. PLANS FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.3. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFORMATION WAS DETERMINED FROMSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS AND EXISTING PLANS OF RECORD. THECONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN THE FIELDpRroR TO ANY SITE WORK. CALL DIG-SAFE (888) 344-7233 72-H0URSPRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION.4, SHEET C_I, ,,ABUTTERS PLAN & EXISTING CONDITIONS,,' REPRESENTS THE1"=40' VICINITY PLAN WTHIN THE TOWN 0F YARM0UTH ZONING BYLAW,sEcTl0N 408.6.3.5. THIS SHEET WAS ORIGINALLY PRINTED TO ANSI D (22,'X34,,) WITH 1''MARGINS, PRINTING TO ANSI B (11,,X17,,) WLL RESULT IN A HALF-SCALE(1:2) SHEET SET WITH 1/2' MARGINS. CONFIRM ALL SCALED DISTANCESWITH GRAPHICAL SCALES SHOWN HEREIN.6. NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE CODES ANDORDINANCES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWNG:BUILDING CODE: MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE (780 CMR) gTHEDITION (2015 IBC) AND AMENDMENTSELTCTRICIL CODE: NEC 2O2O lYITH MASSACHUSETTS AMENDMENTS (527cMR 12.00)7. THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL AND CONDI]IONS BY THECAPE COD COMMISSiON (CCC) THROUGH ITS DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONALTMPACT DECTSIoN (FILE #21012) DATED JANUARY 13,2022,8. SIGHT LINE PROFILES SL_] THROUGH SL_4 UNDER SEPARATE COVER.PROJECT INFORMATIONRAW LAND WIRELESSCOI/MUNICATIONS FACILITYSITE TYPE:SCOPE OF WORK:SITE NAME:SITE NUMBER:SITE ADDRESS:ASSESSOR,S TAX IDfl:ZoNING DISTRICT(S):LATITUDE:LONGITUDE:(P) ELEVATION:DATUM:PROPERTY OWNER:APPLICANT:SITE ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:PROPOSED 115, TALL CLOCK TOWER(119,6,+ FROM STREET GRADE) WTH55'x6O' FENCED COMPOUND WITHIN100'x100' LEASE AREA ANDDRAINAGE/UTILITY EASEMENIS.SOUTH YARMOUTHMA-51041044 ROUTE 28SOUTH YARMOUTH, IilA 02664tilAP 50 LOT 189.1BUSINESS (82)uorlr/uordr cjvrRLlv DlsTRlcr 1 (HM0D1)VILLAGE CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT (VC3)41'39' J2.O8"t N (RICORD SURVEY 1A)70' 12' 15.16"+ W (RECORD SURVEY 1A)13.6'+NAD83/NAVD88N,/F ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF FALLRIVER c,/o sr. Ptus xP.O. BOX 2577FALL RIVER, MA 02722BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC352 PARK STREETSUITE 106NORTH READING, MA 01864PROTERRA DESIGN GROUP, LLC4 BAY ROADBUILDING A: SUITE 200HADLEY, MA 01035TEL: (413) 320-4918NORTHEAST SURVEY CONSULTANTS3 FERRY STREETSTUDIO 1 EASTEASTHAMPTON. MA 01027TEL: (41J) 203-5144VICINITY MAPPONDLOCUSAoSWAN POND,rsN€BrE g:€FSCALE:1" = 1O0o'* (22x34)1" = 2000'+ (11x17)
ProTerraDESION GROUP, LLO4Bulldlng A;Hodley,Boy RoodSults 200MA 01035(413)320-4918STAMP:DATE: 08,/07/2020SHEET TITLE:AEUr?'ENS P'JNCONSULTANIS:NORTMAST SURVEYCONSULTANTS3 F€rry Strs€tStudlo 1 EoBtMA OlO27203-5t44oaz6UE-!v!codf=zFoz!Ftrza!{zIov=oFo:z=)ltLFoIfFooztNEEEigs3H€\'onblEHHkra eNEEH$ilHEo>JVJa-tt (llr =E3;5st oJOB NO.: 17-290c-1DRAWN: JDcCHECK: BCFSCALET 1"=4O'&CONDITIOMJ142LEGEND\,N/F- NOW OR FORMERLY- IRON PIPE ,/ ROD FOUND_ CONCRETE BOUND FOUND- CATCH BASIN- UTILITY POLE- LOCUS PROPERTY LINE- ABUTTERS PROPERTY LINE- ZONING LINE_ FEMA FLOOD ZONE LINE- CONTOUR LINE_ OVERHEAD WRE- TREELINE50-95/IPFotrEp50-13N/FRITA SIANO68 FOREST ROADSOIJIH YARUOUTH, MA 0266450-96KABLEEN J. SERRANO16 TAIOR SNEETWALHAM, MA 02154/u[oRDRIW02664t150-s7N/FANIHONY PINO14 TATLOR SNEETWAL'IHAM, MA 02453/IDDl-l1,I#I- oHw-\-A-/\r-/\-A-l--,\-^-\-\-/-7;\ttD&IFtzIRFII50-117,N/FMARY ANGUS1MUIIEN24T' MAIN STREETWAREHAM, MA 02571Lc50-8N/FALITN E. RYONEP.0. BOX 440BREWSTER, MA 0263II50-144.1.150-3N/FROBERT F. KOVAR2OJ BEECH STIIITENTHAM, MA 02093on"----.....-* "o*uorTf*.0'-t o"104 WLMOT ROAODEERFIELD. IL 60015,/BOOrl;s"tOsqFT,/I50-185,,*u*r" ,ol/otaro". at. ,*a.PO BoX 14115READING, PA '9612IABUTTERSPLAN & EXISTING CONDITIONS50-188N/FJOHN SIAMOSANSI D (22'X54-) scALE: l--40'ANsl A 01'x17') scALE: 1'=80'50-180J452FAA 1.A CERTIFICATIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE LAIITUDE, LONGITUDE, AND ELEVA11ON PRESENTED HEREONMEET IHE REQUIREMENTS OF lHE FAA WlH THE FOLLOWING ACCURACIES:THREEFEET VERTICALLYFEET HORIZONTALLYDATEF. STASZ,# 47160o8/07 /2o1eSURVEY NOTESI.SIIEDETAILsHowNoNTHISSURVEYISBASEDoNFIELDDATAcoLLEcTEDoNNoVEMBERia, zor;. ntis sunvlv rs PREPARED lN coNFoRMANcE wTH THE PRooEDURES ANDnEburnel,iEnrs rbi oerl ACcUMULATIoN SURVEYS, As sET FoRrH lN 250 cMR sEcrloN6b). ebuNoenv lNFoRMArloN ts coMPILED FRoM REcoRD DocuMENTs AND ls Nor rosE coNsin0ro As HAVTNG BEEN oBTAINED AS THE RESULT oF A FIELD BoUNDARYSUnvEv, nHo ts SueJEcr ro cHANcE AS AN AccURATE FIELD SURVEY MAY DlscLosE'2. lHE PURPOSE OF IHIS SURVEY IS TO SUPPORT THE DESIGN AND CONSIRUCTION OF A-' rEircouuurutcAnoN FAcrLtrY. usE oF THls sURVEY BY ANYoNE oTHER IHAN BLUE sKYiowtRs ili; ilc, ntro use or- THls sURVEY FoR ANY PURPoSE Nor RELATED To THEDESIGN OF THE INTENDED FACILITY IS STRIC1LY PROHIBITED'3. PROPERTY LINES AND BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON IHIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON A- cciuptulor oF REcoRDED PLANs AND DEEDS AND ARE Nor INTENDED To REPRESENToEiniiivr BoUNDARy LrNEs oR BE usED FoR THE PURPoSES oF coNVEYANoE'FnopenrV nilliEo tlronunloN HAS Nor BEEN ooNFIRMED BY FIELD SURVEYbriiEnVerrons ltro Ho essEsst,tENT oF LAND occuPATloN HAS BEEN coNDUcTED lNni prieFlinrrou oF THts suRVEY. A PRoPERTY LINE RETRAcEMENT SURVEY HAS NoTBEEN CONDUCTED.4, THE PROPERTY LINES SHOW! ON THIS PLAN ARE lHE LINES DIVIOING EXISTINGOWNERSHIP,S, AND THE LINES OF STREETS AND WAYS SHOWN ARE THOSE OF PUBLIC ORFfrvnrE srniers oR wAys ALREADY ESTABLISHED, AND No NEw LINES FoR DlvlsloN 0FEXISTING OWNERSHIP OR FOR NEW WAYS ARE SHOWN.5. PRIMARY GEODETIC SURVEY CONTROL WAS ESTABLISHED FROM AN ON THE GROUNDSURVEY USING THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) ON NOVEMBER 28' 2017, 7HEiodrzbHrer- REFERENcED DATUM ls rHE NAD 83 bAsED oN THE GRs 80 REFERENcEEiirisoro. inr cnto cooRotHATES ARE BAsED oN THE MASSAcHUSETTS srATE PLANEcooRDTNATE SYSTEM OF 1983 CORS96 (MAINLAND 2001). ELEVATIONS SHOW! AREeiiuuib eNo ARE APPRoxIMATED To iHE NAVD 88 vERTIcAL DATUM. vERTIcAL ANDHONZOHTT INFORMATION SHOWN MEETS IHE STANDARD CRITERIA FOR AN FAA 1ACERTIFICATION (20'+ HORTZONTAL AND 3'* VERTICAL).6. IN IHE EVENT THAT BENCHMARKS (TBM'S)' ESTABLISHED FOR THIS PRO'JECT AND-' FueLisFiED oN THts suRVEY, lnr oesrnoVEo, Nor RECoVERABLE oR A DISoREPANCY lsiouro, tne usen suoulo t'tolrv tttts FIRM lN wRlrlNG PRIoR To coMMENcING 0RCONI1NUING ANY WORK.7. lHE LOCUS PARCEL IS SHOW! AS PARCEL 5O-1S9.1 IN THE TOWN OF YARMOUTH TAXASSESSOR,S DATABASE.IHE PROJECT AREA lS LOCATED lN FLOOD ZONE AE (BASE FLOOD ELEVATIoN = 11') &ZONE "X" (SHADED) (AREAS OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOoD; AREAS oF 1% ANNUALcillrcE rr-'ooo wfn'nveRlce DEPTHS oF LESs IHAN 1 Foor oR wrH DRAINAGE AREAsirs5 rnnn t soulRe MILE; AND AREAS PRoTEcTED BY LEVEES FRoM 1% ANNUALcierucE rr-ooo), AND zoNE x (UNsHADED) (AEEAS .gl-Ylt'llv4!-fLggryNq) As--stlow! -oNFlboollsunn(ce RATE MAP cbt'.tuuntrY I'ANEL NUMBER 25001c 0587 J' DATED JULY16, 2014.THE LOCUS PARCEL IS LOCATED IN lHE TOWN OF YARMOUTH 82 ZONING DISTRICT(VILLAGE CENTER 3 OVERLAY DISTRICT & HOTEL/MOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT).10. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFORMATION WAS DETERMINED FROM SURFACE--iIVESrrCErIOr,rS AND EXISTING PLANS OF RECORD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALLuuorncioutlo urlLtrtEs lN THE FIELD PRIoR To ANY slrE woRK. cALL THE FoLLowNGidn lrl Fne-cotlsrRucrtoN NortFlcATloN 72-HouRS PRIoR To ANY EXcAVATIoNACTTVITY: DIG SAFE SYSTEM (MA, ME' NH, Rl, VT): 1-888-344-723311. NO WETLAND DELINEATIONS WERE OBSERVED.PROPERTY OWNER:LOCUS DEED REFERENCE:PLAN REFERENCES:ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF FALL RIVERc/o sT. Prus xP.O. BOX 2577FALL RIVER, MA 02722DEED BOOK 669 PAGE '144PLAN BOOK 78 PAGE 29I\CENTEROF TOITERLAT:4139'J2.08'LoN:70'1 2'l 5,1 6'N,2703122.19E:10102s1.28GRoUND EL12,tSANDRASOUTH50-190N,/FM. DIGIOVANNI. IRUSIEEP.O.80X 1282YARMOTJIH, MA 02664\BITPARKING\.r./'/ \-CONTROL POINT-MAO NAIL SETN:27oJ585.55E:1o10102.41BlI.PARKING21d+128'*BITPARKING/\F*IMAGNAILN:Erl\I!tigIE!HlFL,AREA - 4.4f,LOCUS50-189.1N/FROMAN CAIHOLIC BISHOPOF FALL RI\ERc/o sr. Plus xP.O, BOX 2577FALL RIVER, MA 02722DEEo 66S-144t PLAN 78-29ZONE:81so-l91NftALToN H. rtrEST70 LONG POND DRI\ESOUIH YARMOTJIH, MA026644\i(IIIIZONE:82\\\VIOODEDEL=14.9C(IIII/:IrijI)IIII)GWOODEDI(UNSHAPED)IlBMy,lII,t/ITII()sI(,*-"i.'i::,^r. IIO BNON LANEsdrn YARMouff. MA t02664 f---/50-10NIVIDA T, PAGOAGAA9 LO.IG POND DRI\€SOUTH YARMflff, MA 0266450-9N/FJOSEPH P. RNNEGANP.O. BOX S41SOIJIH YARMOUIH, MA 02664A17.+ CAPTAIN NOYES ROAOSOUIH YARMOUTH, MA 02664uo*n* ,Xf,* *u.tPO BoX 350SOUIH YARMOUTH, MA 0266440'40'80'
ProTerraDESION GROUP, LLCBulldlng AiBoy RoodSuite 20OMA 01035Ph: (413)320-4918CONSULIANISiSfAMP:DATE: 12/28/2022DRAWN: BLM/STZSCALE: SEE PLANAERIAL &u,scs ff/PSazov.lzlElnFIEHlz-lE!ql=dltrI*l*;l;nltolozl2EIF=t=eledlooUeoztrF=ucoUEozF=EoouueozL=EtrFoozoniEEiHHEH<nE1HHHBEEEoJ>J7h=., qgq;HNOst FJOB NO.: 17-056A-1SHEET IITLE:CHECK: JMM/IEJ234ttulrrrtLN1IDDIr.lI'IcC')(Ilc\JCIBBTt-tiloAl*petREF: ,'USGS COLOR ORTHO TMAGERY (201312014)" DATALAYER DATED APRIL 2O13/2O1+ PqlAlE-?-BY OFFICE 0Fceocneiirc inroir"rnlou (MAsscts), cor,,ri,ronwtnrrH oF MASsAoHUsETTS, tNFoRMATIoN TEcHNoLocY DlvlsloNREFI DENNIS, MA QUADRANGLES, PREPARED BY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR'U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, DATED 2015DEP WETLANDS - DATALAYER PREPARED BY OFFICEoF GEocRAPHIc INFoRMATIoN (MASSGIS),coMMoNwEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, MASSIT (2009)MAPPHOTOSCALE:1-=5oo'(22xJa)t-=to0o'(ltxt7)423LOCUSIis/1\.A-1,oSCALE:1'-200'(22x34)(11x17)mo
ProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4Bulldlng A;Hodley'Boy RoodSuit6 200MA O1OJ5Ph: (413)120-4e18CONSULIANIS:STAMP:DATE: 12/28/2022DRAW'I: BLM/STZCHECK: JMM/1EJSCAIET sEE PLANCOUPII,EDPNT PAN@zo6UtI==vLvooU=aoatozE&co@uozl-=eLco@EoztrF=uooUUEIzF=EcouEozt-=tcoEoztrF=ctrFoozNEEEiFI$Essto1HHEEEEE9>J76=.., HPFl;5et oJOB NO.: 17-056A-2SHEET TITLE:+++++ 50-'173 ++l++++++++++++++++it++++++++\50-172+++++++++++++++++++++t'50-186++++++++++++++++t++ -+^ +.c)9,++++p++++++++++++*++++++++++++++++++++++t+++++++++++++++++++++II50-92--1I50-98 ++++++++++++50-101+++++++++++++t++\+++++\+++t++++++++++++t+i+++++++++t+++tt++++++l.'+++++++++f+++++++++++++++++++++i++++++++++++++++++++++I++r++++f+++++T++++s.o-97++++*++i+++i+++++ 50-100 t+11 1++ +Y +l.l;L-r50-950-6+++++++++++++++++++It+++III\++f++(E)fHun"u+++tI++++l--++++++++++Jts.r.4+LOCUSOO' LEASE AREA+++++t+fqlFF2t^xi<dseZONE X(uNsHADEo)"o"on "o#5u" ,,.ror1OF FALL RIVER PABISH +l+++++++c/o sr. Plus xP.O. EOX 2sZFALL RIVEF, MA 02722MAP 50 LOT 189.1AREA = 4.4 ACt+ rP) 115't\'bH5,iiP(sourH &+++t++(P) FENCED COMPOUND ANDCLOCK TOWER WTHIN++++++++++++++I\\50-1 94+t+j+++++d+++++t++i+++.+l-+++++t++ 50-188 ++++++++t++++++++++++f+'50-187 + ++++++++t++++50-35J452t_i!++++t++++++++++\++ft++++++++t++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++tUEoo2oGoz-9+++++++++++++++++++++++++++r++++++++t+++++++",*+t+++++++++i++t+Dt+tD50-93+t+++f+++t++\to!++t++t++++++++++++)\+++*\ao,co++t+++++I++I+++iit++++++++++++++++t++++t+a+++/+::J\+++++++++++J.+++++++++++++:lrl++(E) LoCUSPROPERTY+LINE++++++++50-1 1 7.1+++c++++c++50-2+++++++++t++++++++++++++++++++++f++++I+++loao++++++15'+++,Jt+++vWDE**[:+++TY EASEMENTI+++R.O.W.++++++++++50-1 75++++t+++++BB++++++ZONE AE++t+++++++++++q+50-1t\.'S *'o+++++++++t++++++t82+++)+++t+++x+t++++42-33.1+++t++f++++++++++++++++++++++f+++++ + +2-38++r+++./::+ 42-37.1 +++++\++*++*f *'+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++It+++++++++t+++++++++i++t+++++++++++++++++++++++++\++t+++++++++++f+++++++'i++++++++++++++++++++++t++{+i+t+++++++++++++ft++++++f++++++++++++++++++t++++++++t++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++iti+f++++++t+++++++++++++f+++++++t++++++++tt+++++f+t++ +A + ++ +-/+\+ +++i+++++++++++oCOMPILED PLOT45REFERENCESPROPERTY LINE, TOPOGRAPHY AND EXISTING FEATURES _ SEE SHEET C_1ZONING DISTRICTS - MAP ENTITLED "ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF YARMOUTH" UPDATEDTHROUGH ANNUAL TOWN MEETING, MAY 7, 2016.THE FOLLOWNG DATALAYERS PREPARED BY OFFICE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION(MASSGIS), COMMONWEALIH OF MASSACHUSETTS, MASSIT- eurlorNG STRUCTURES (2-D, FROM ORTHO IMAGERY) (JUNE 2017)_ MASSDEP WETLANDS (FEATURES INCLUDING OPEN WATER, MARSHES, SWAMPS &TIDAL FLATS) (DECEMBER 2017)- FEMA NATIONAL FLOOD HAZARD LAYERcorrrRuEb wrH FLooD tNsuRANcE RATE MAP 25oo1co5B7J EFFEcrlvE JULY 16' 2014- FnEPNNTO BY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, US DEPARTMENT OFHOVEUNO SECURITY. PORTIONS OF THE SITE ARE LOCATED WTHIN ZONE AE AND2onr x. zolr x rs cLAsstFtED As AN AREA DETERMINED To BE ourslDE rHE o'2%IHIUIT CHEICE FLOODPLAIN. ZONE AE IS A FEMA SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREASUS.JECT TO INUNDATION BY THE ONE_PERCENT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD WHEREeAiE rrooo ELEVATToNS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. A PoRTloN oF THE PRoPoSEDWORK IS LOCA]ED WTHIN LAND SUBJECT TO COASTAL STORM FLOWAGE.I;lrlzoNE x - pl5i'ot lf,llo"'tto To BE ouTSrDE IP'E o'2% ANNUAL cHANcEt++++AREAS OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD; AREAS OF 1% ANNUALCHANCE FLOOD WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOTZONL ^ - oR WTH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1 SOUARE MILE; ANDAREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FROM 1Z ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD.SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAS) SUBJECT TOINUNDATION BY THE 1Z ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD; BASE FLOODz0Nt AL -ELEVATIoNS DETERMTNED.(LAND SUBJECT TO COASTAL STORM FLOWAGE)+++.t+GENERAL NOTES2.THE TYPE, DIMENSIONS, MOUNTING HARDWARE, AND POSITIONS OF A,LL PROJECT OWNER'SrOUfpfurEli ene SHOWIt tttt TLLUSTRATTVE FASHION. ACTUAL HARDWARE DETAILS AND FINALLOCATIONS MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM WHAT IS SHOWN.THE PROJECT OWNER'S PCS FACILITY IS AN UNMANNED PRIVATE AND SECURED EQUIPMENTnsJlrrlrr,cN. rr rs oNLy AccESsED BY TRAINED TECHNICIANS FoR PERloDlc RourlNEvlrnrErlrcr AND THEREFoRE DoEs Nor REQUIRE ANY wATER oR SANITARY sEwERSENVLCI. iHT FACILITY IS NOT GOVERNED BY REGULATIONS REQUIRING PUBLIC ACCESS PERADA REQUIREMENTS.rir orsror br fiE TowER, FoUNDATIoN AND ANTENNA MoUNTING HARDwARE wLL MEETTHE ANSI,/EIAITIA_222_G STANDARDS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL ANTENNA SUPPORTINGsinuCiu(rs hro stetE BUTLDTNG coDE REQUIREMENTS. DETAILED coNsrRucrloNonewitos AND sTRUcTURAL cALcuLATloNs wLL BE PREPARED BY A REGISTEREDFHoressroruer- ENGTNEER AND suBMtrrED wlrH A BUILDING PERMIT APPLIcATIoN FoRNCVCW IIO APPROVAL BY THE LOCAL BUILDING CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL.olce rHi llctrtrv eEcoMrs FULLY oPERATIoNAL, NoRMAL AND RourlNE MAINTENANcEBY TOWER OW\ER,S AND CARRIER,S TECHNICIANS WLL BE PERFORMED. THE ESTIMATEDviHrcur-An inrrtc cElrrRerD BY THEsE vlslrs ls PREDIoTED To BE LESS IHAN THETYPICAL TRAFFIC GENERATED BY A SINGLE_FAMILY DWELLING.siEEr c-r, "ABUTTERS PLAN & ExtsrlNG coNDlrloNS," REPRESENTS rHE'1"=40'VlclNlrYPLAN WTHIN THE TOWN OF YARMOUTH ZONING BYLAU SECNON 408.6'3.3.4.5.ZONING SUMMARYzoNrNG DrsrRrcT(s): BUSINFSS DISTRICT (82)oVERLAY DISTRICT(S): HoTEL/MoTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT 1 (HM0D1) .. . VILLAGE CENTERS OVERLAY DISTRICT 3 (VC3)'ASSESSORS lD: MAP 50 LOT 189.1(P) USE: PERSONAL WRELESS SERVICE FACILITY -DIMENSIONPROVIDEDCONSTRAINTPARCEL - AREA4.4 AC+20,000 sF MlN.PARCEL - FRONTAGE1,223't125' MlN.PARCEL -&.IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE85% MAX.COMPOUND - FRONT YARD113'+15' MiN.(P) COMPOUND _ SIDE YARD177't15, MINCOMPOUND - REAR YARD69'+20' MIN,COMPOUND _ ACCESSORY STRUCTURE HEIGHT'14'135, MAX.(P) CLOCK TOWER _ HEIGHT (HIGHEST APPURTENANCE)11s'rr 1tg.o'+'200' MAX.CLOCK TOWER - DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE120't(looz HETGHT(P) FACILITY - DISTANCE TO SCENIC ROAD>3OO' (OLD MArN STREET)1 - TOW\ OF YARMOUTH, ZONING BYLAWS 2017, S2OJ.5 TABLE OF DIMENSIONALREQUIREMENTS (A): "THE VILLAGE cENTERS oVERLAY DISTRIcT (vcoD) oVERLAYS.oTHERDlsrRtcTs ltto iir oturlstoNAL REQUIREMENTS oF sEcrloN 414 sHALL GovERN "2 ... TOWN OF YARMOUTH, ZONINC BYLAWS 2017' 94OA.7.2.1 ALLOWED AREAS: ''1' THE- SITING OF PERSONAL WRELESS FACILITIES SHALL BE ALLOIVED IN ANY ZONINGDISTRICT,..,,SPECIAL CONSIDERATION FOR THE FOLLOWNG:3 - TOWI\I OF YARMOUTH, ZONING BYLAWS 2017, 9+OA,7.6.2 HEIGHT. GROUND_MOUNTEDFAclLlTlEs: "GROUND-MoUNTED PERSoNAL WRELESS SERVICE FACILITIES SHALL NoTpio,rtcr HtcHrn THAN TEN FEET ABovE THE AVERAGE BUILDING HEIcHT oR' lF THEREnnE t'lO eUtrOtNCS WTHIN 300 FEET, THESE FACILITIES SHALL NOT PROJECT HIGHERTHNI TTT.T FEET ABOVE ruC IVTNNCE TREE CANOPY HEIGHT, MEASURED FROM GROUNDLEVET (AGO. IN NO CASE MAY HEIGHT EXCEED 2OO FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL."4 - HEIGHT OF TOWER ABOVE ADJACENT STREET GRADE (ROUTE 28) AS DEFINED IN THETOWN OF YARMOUTH, ZONING BYLAWS FOR HEIGHT MEASUREMENTS.I h-+scALE: 1'=80' (22x34)1'=160'(11xl7)2LAN++++f3+,:+++++.t
ProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4 BoY RoodBulldlnq A; Suite 200Hodl€r MA 01035Ph: (413)J20-4318CONSULIANIS:SfAMP:DATE: 12/28,/2022DRAWN: BLM/'TZCHECK: JMM/TEJscAtE; SEE PLANOVERAUSITE PI/Nzo6UvozEEUdEoufaaoEoztrF=&oaEozl-=/IoUvoztrF=eIoaEozL=dco&ozt-=EcoUEFozNEEEiilEIHEt'AEb1HHHEHEEo>JU'." Hp$;gNO<l I-JOB NO.: 17-056SHEEI TITLE:A-3DISTURBANCE SUMMARYITEMAREA (SF)TREE CLEARING9,690(P) GRAVEL SURFACES (DRIVEWAY & COMPOUND)3,A25(P) LOAM & SEED6,J20(P) U/C uTlLrTY TNSTALL To R.O.W.405TOTAL EARTH DISTURBANCE1 0,550A--**t-t-lIIJ543--\22t'' ;rtfii.l rlat(E) wooDEDAREAFENCED COMPOUND ANDCLOCK TOWER WIHIN100'x100' LEASE AREA/{//,/,/?D{ZONEX(UNSHADED)Drr:(E) CHURCHBUILDING---r. * _15L)- (P)l.IIc "\BFEMA FLOOD(zoNE x)BOUNDARYj.< \+* t -"\t-I,lI7€(P) UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES(P) TREE LINE/"i,id*-!zILOCUSN/F(E) PAVEDPARKING LOTOVERIEAD.4// -,//Yl4-.-- 12'- i-; --,f "(P) 1PEAGRAVELDIAPHRAGMIIIIROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOPOF FALL RIVER PAFISHc/o sT. PlusxP,O. BOX 257FALL RIVER, MA 02722MAP 50 LOt 189.1AREA - 4.4 ACtI(E) EDGE OFPAVEMENT, TYP.c(P)WTHVEGETATED SWALEEROSION CONTROLBLANKET, TYP.IIIIIFEMA FLOOD (ZONE AE)1OO YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ANDLAND SUBJECT TO COASTALsroRM FLOWAGE. 11' (NAVD88)ZONEX(SHADED)/\/'SOIL MAP UNIT: 252ACARVER COARSE SANDHSG: 'A'(P) PAD MOUNTEDTRANSFORMER(E) WooDEDAREA-oft-t(E) UTILITY POLE#200-35A11/\(cLocKTOWER FACE)IIIIIIIlt'rdQ"'rtj*n* tottl\\-g-r'(cLocK(E) UTILITY PoLE#2Oo-36-/tttt-\0'(P) DRAINAGEEASEMENT(P) TREE IINEOVERHEADIIII)oeBAUt#UNPooJo(E) PAVEMENTMARKINGS, TYP.(P) INFILTRATION BASINWTH SEDIMENT FOREBAY(PRETREATMENT)\\1r; ',*o ,o**,*a',-AREAREPLACE DEAD FRUITTREE (IN KIND)l(SCALE:(E)PARKIPAVEDNG LOT(P) 10' wDEUTILITY EASEMENTTO PUBLIC R.O.W.(E) NATURAL y'VFGFTATED J-g' -* - '*- -* -. g- * -* -- /'oHw-""-iii-oHWl#rrLtgn stntp - -\--* \ -- -*- -_'\\(E) BrT. DRIVE\....- -* -- -ITE PLAN5CONNECT UNDERGROUND UTILITIESTO (E) UTTLTTY POLE #200-36,COORDINATE WTH UTILITYPURVEYOR, UPGRADE AS REQUIREDROUTE 2834
ProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4 BoY RoodBuilding A; Suite 200Hodle, MA 010J5Ph: (41r)J20-4918cojJsull4rvls'STAMP:DAft: 12/28/2022DRAWN: BLM/STZCHECK: JMM/\EJSCALE SEE PLANSHEET fITLE:COUNUND PI/N& EI,EVATIONzoUI=:vLEooUl6o6UtozE=eIoEoztrF=EooEozE&coUUuozF=ecoaeazEEouFoozNEEEi,iilEIHE\'ssblHHHBE€EH;HEo>J7h=., HP3;gst o<l FJoB No.: 17-056A-42543z-ZONE X(UNSHADED)'I.$/ZONEX(SHADED)/iII+\tt-IIh(P) 1oo'xl00'LEASE AREA(F) CARRIER LEASEAREA, TYP.VEGETATED SWALEEROSION CONTROLBLANKET, TYP,(P) AT&T 2so SFLEASE AREA WTHGROUND EOUIPMENT+tr/zo(P) SCREENINGTREES.IE AE/o-DD(P)WTH(P) IREE LINEFII++t._.....t 1....- --l 1,.,---*----* f-"* -' -t-*_........._....t(P) REINFORCED CONCRETEFOUNDATION PENDING RESULTSOF GEOTECHNICAL REPORTI J.O(F.G. AT TOWER CENTER)lASSUMED STREETrrevirtoru, RourE 2s)+r\- /+-.-i-++INOTE:ONLY ONE SECTOR VIEW ISSHOWN FOR CLARITY. REFERTO SHEETS FOR CA_l ANDCA-J FOR CARRIER EQUIPMENTAND MOUNT DETAILS..2\.cA-,NOTE:CLIMBING PEGS SHALL NOT BEINSTALLED ON THE TOWER LEGSFOR THE FIRST 14,t ABOVEGRADE, OR A CAGE WTH LOCKWLL BE INSTALLED TO PREVENTACCESS TO THE TOWER.(P) 55'x60' 6' TALLSTOCKADE FENCE(P) CRAY ASPHALTSHINGLES(P) PAINTED WHITEWOOD TRIM(P) T-MOBILE RFEQUIPMENT BEHIND RFTRANSPARENT SHROUD(P) AT&T RFEOUIPMENT BEHIND RFTRANSPARENT SHROUD58.0'+PANELFACE(F)(BYRF EQUIPMENTOTHERS), TYP.(P) CLoCK FACE(BY oTHERS)14,J PANELFACE, TYP.(P) 2.0'o STEELTOWER LEG, PAINTEDWHITE, TYP.18.0'A TOTAL WIDTH16'+ q LEG TO q LEG+++(P) 12" wDEPEA GRAVELDIAPHRAGM\/J-3' MIN. SEPARATION PROVIDED FORAI IERNAIT (F) 8' lALL ANTI-NNAS3' MIN. SEPARATION PROVIDED FORALTERNATE (F) 8' TALL ANTENNAS(P) sroNECOMPOUNDSURFACE(P) 6' H|GH SoUNDMITIGATION SHIELD,DESIGN BY OTHERS(P) T-MoB|LE 10'x26'LEASE AREA WTHGROUND EOUIPIMENT\(P) METER CENTER VHOFFMANBOX & ICE CANOPY PROTECTION(AS REQUTRED). PROVTDE 2'MlN.FROM BOTTOM OF ELECTRICPANELS TO BASE FLOODELEVATION (BFE)uozzPElo&FaUI0IoottgoFYooJoLooFoFzotrgUooeo=laooE_'+l@oidozzFv)oLFaUI!2ILooEEgoFYoo)ooLoF+tirta5o@uoIoz{zoFozloLozolJoze=oFvooJooooF+tbazzFzJUz&5@oIcei+tioocC1(P) RFP/PVC PANELS(FIBER REINFORCED POLWER)PAINTED GRAY2'1'o:'(P) Ar&r (2) DC TRUNKLTNES, (1) FrBER LINE,AND (1) INNERDUCT RUNWTHIN TOWER LEG1'2'(P) WHITE RFP/PVC TRIM(TOP AND BOTTOM)(P) MIN. ELEVATION FORTOP OF CONCRETE PIERFOUNDATION = 13.6'NAVD88(MlaEUIFoozzFzJUzLj@EUEomzzFz)uzo.t1?DazzFzJUzoFdEFcet.tl'noFEMA FLOOD (ZONE AE)lOO YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ANDLAND SUBJECT TO COASTALsroRM FLOWACE. 11' (NAVD88)\-r(B -\(P) 4" SLOTTED PIPE ANDSTONE FOUNDATION DRAINTO DAYLIGHT WTH RIPRAPOUTLET PROTECTIONINV OUT = TBDSl OPE = 0.5% MlN.h2B(P) T-MoB|LE 50010.2(ME)LPWDE12'TANK ON 4'x10' CONCRETE PAD.-,\-',t111;'1 (P) lcE BRIDoE PRoTEcTIoNFROMoOtzL<LOdci,o anoFDRIVEWAY(P) DRAINAGEEASEMENT(P) TREE LINE\10.10.2(ME)9.8T-----IIF-III(P) 15'ACCESSWDEEASEMENTTO PUBLIC R.O.W.L...- (ME)(ME)(E) PAVEDPARKING LOT(P) ,NO PARKING'MARKINGSa' COMPOUND PLANSCALE: 1"=1O'1"-20'?.\IN. 1' ABoVE 13.5')oa1"_lf-(P) INFILTRATION BASINWTH SEDIMENT FOREBAY(PRETREATMENT)EXCAVATION & PREPARATION OFFOUNDATION BASE & STRUCTURALBACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE INACCORDANCE WITH GEOTECHNICALRECOMMENDATIONS (BY OTHERS)ELEVATION(cLocKSCALET 1'=10'1"=20'II(P) UNDERGROUNDUTILITIESJ,,(P) 1o'UTILITYEASEMENTTOR.O.W.TREE CANOPY NOIE:EXISTING TREE CANOPY HEIGHT PROVIDED BYVIRTUAL SITE SIMULATIONS, LLC WTHIN ,'TREEHEIGHT ANALYSIS PACKAGE" DATED MARCH 15,2022 (IREE HEIGHTS FROM LIDAR SOURCES),254J1III ogsga BY oTHFRS-- --1" -'- |l----------r3.1a------IIL(P) 6'MITIGAHIGHsouTIONsHtELD,= 13.6*(P) cLocKTOWERu/(F) 0ARRTERRF EOUIPMENT(P) DOUBLE6, GATES9.25.6CIP UNDER
ProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4Bullding A;HodletBoy Roodsuite 200MA 01035Ph: (413)s2o-4918CONSULIANIS:IIPLACE Allionce37 Soulh Pleolont Sl, Sulle 3NEAmhed, rriA 0l 002413.t87.1i154STAMP:DAIE: t2/28/2022DRAWN: BLM/STZCHECK: JMM/TEJzo6Ecztr!xIuoaU=,1,1,>l>l>;l;l;Fl=15clolooUug2t-=doouaugzE4ooeczEddUFo{cla@lold;lbliN@Ndo2o- l*1"EEEiFIsEnb1HHEEXEE9>J6=., H8q;gHOSCALEj SEE PLANJoB NO.: 17-056SHEET TITLE:PI/MINCPLANA-5NOTE:INKIND O) FRUIT TREEBELT NORTHEAST OFPLAN A-5 FOR LOCA'IION).7t*),-. -- - -IILSTONE-lIII.JLT-3-PrltJ452tlFill),"' ELACK PLAST1C HOSE1tGA. GALV WRE, COIL EACHNGHIY ALLOW FOR AOEQUAEx)l€END- h --*o-rr cA. cALV wRE. corlll Hlll EAcH ENo rcHtY ALLow FoRr.|Y II ADEOUAIE TRUNK MOWMENT,"'P\-t3hmo BLA6KPLAS'NC HOSENUNK MOV€MENTLOAM & SEED ALL DISTURBED\ /j-AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE,(P) s5'x60' 6' TALLSTOCKADE FENCECOMPOUND AND DRIVEWAY.STABILIZE WTH EROSIONCONlROL .BLANKET.I3-CTENIABCTLOEIAILENLARGED OETAILDAMAGE OR CUTTRIM BRANCHES TO RETAIN NAruRAL FORMOF NEE DO NOT INJURE BRANCH COLLARDD(P) loo'x1oo'-JLEASE AREA I2I-BARS40X40X5XLONC OUTSiDE ROOT 8ALI.,SIDE OF PREVAILING UNDS2500MMWff ONE ON(oPTroNAL).OFiltNBARKED TREES WTHAf APPROPRIAE NMEOF ROOT AAI SHALL BEARTHE AREATO FINISHED(P) TREE LINEIT DID TO PREVOUS GRADEMULCH OVER ENNRE PLANNNGHOLE, KEEP AWAY FROM TRUNKCREATE RAISED SAUCERAROUND EDGE OF ROOT BALLBEtJ\OFROOIgALL SHALL BEAR SAMEFINISHED CRAOE AS IT DIDTOTO PREVOUS GRADEENNRE PLANTING HOLE.WTH NANW SOILTRUNK.I(P)SAUCER AROUNDBALLVEGETATED SWALEEROSION CONTROLBLANKET, TYP.ANDREMOVE ToP 1/3 OFruNE AND HREWfl NATIW SOIL3_RM2-loBURLAP,BASXETFRdROOTBALLFINISHEO& A ROOT BALLSEfrLING,BENEATHDO NOTROOT BALLBURLAP,ROOT BALL*-r 12- ._*NOTFS:I. DO NOT DAMACE MAIN ROOB OR DESMOYROOT BALL wlEN INSTALUNG MEE STAKE.2. WAER ffOROUGHLY AFER INSTALLANN.3. REMOVE TREE RINGS AND STAKES TWOYEARS AFER INSTATLANON.4. PROVIDE DRAINAGE FOR PLANNNO PIT IF INIMPERMEABLE SOIL,5. ALL TREES MUST BE TACGED AND APPROWDBY CONSULTANT WHIN 14 OAYS AFERINDER CLOSINC.ROOT BALL2_PMNqIESiI, DO NOT DAMAGE MAIN ROOTS OR DESTROYROOT BALL ffiEN INSTALLING IREE STAKE,2, WATER THOROUCHLY AFER INSTALLATION.3, REMOVE TREE RINCS AND STAKES ruOYEARS AFTER INSTALLATION.4. PROVDE DRAINAGE FOR PLANINC PIT IF INIMPERMEABLE SOIL,5, ALL REES MUST BE TACCEO AND APPROVEDBY CONSULTANT WIBIN 14 DAYS AFIERTENOER CLOSINC.SUB CRADE, TO AVOID SETIINGEXCAVAE BENEATH ROOT BALL3_VTCc--lTREE PLANTING DETAILS (ALL SOILS)LOAM & SEED ALLDISTURBED AREASOUTSIDE OF THECOMPOUND ANDDRIVEWAY. STABILIZE!!]TH EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET.CLEANLY PRUNE ONLY DAMACED'DISEASEO AND/OR \4€AK BRANCHESFINISHEOCRADE AROUND PLANT TOSAME AS ORIGINAL CRAOEPLANNNG NO'IESPLANNNG SHALL BE EXECUED TO HE LIMITS SHOM ON THE ACCOMPANYNCBEOFftEPLANT1.2.3.THE SPECIFIEOPLAN.SAUCER AROUND ROOT BALLCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVDE PROJECT DES]GNER Wff SAMPLES, PHOTOS' CUT SHEETS, ANDorren ooCuvenrnron FoR ALL PRoPosED MATERIALS AS NEEDEo To ENSURE THE PRoDUoTS r0BE INSTALLED AND USED ON_SITE MEET THE DESIGN INTENT AND SPECIFICATIONPLANTS TO BE APPROVED BY PROJECT OESIGNER PRIOR TO DELIVERY TO SIE. CONNACTORSHALL VERIFY HE RECEIPT OF PLANTS IN GOOO CONDIION, AS SPECIFIEO, AND IN frEOUENIIES SHOM ON lHE PLAN. PLANT SBSITUNON MAY ONLY BE MADE AY PLACE ALLIANCE.ALL COMMERCIALLY OATAINED STOCK WLL BE BARE ROOT (PLANTING OF BARE ROOT PLANTS WLLONLY BE INSTALLEO WilIN APRIL 1ST TO JUNE 15TH OR SEPTEMBER 15fi TO NOVEMBER 3OTH).CONTAINER_GROW{ OR B&8. AND SECURED ffROUGH REGINAL SOURCES TO ENSURE THATPLANTS WLL BE ADAPIED TO LOCAL CLIMAIE AND SIE-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. ALL PLANT4_MPWfr NA]IVE SOIL(P) DRAINACEEASEMENTBURTAPORREMOVE TOP I/J OFCONTAINER (F CON1AINERMATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO HE GUIDEUNES ESTABLISHED BY.HE AMERICAN NURSERY ANDLANDSCAPE ASSOOANON". LAIEST EDINON4. PLANT LOCATIONS SHALL BE 6E STAKED IN BE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLAION TOR APPROVAL BYPROJECT OESICNER ANO MAY BE ADJUSED EASED ON SITE SPECIFIC CONDI'NONS' PLANTSUBSNruNONS DUE TO COMMERCIAL AVAILABILI1Y OR HMROLOGICAL CONDITIONS MAY BE MADEAY THE PROJTCT DESICNER.5. PLANNNC WLL AE OELAED AS NEEDED TO ENSURE PLANNNG IS COMPIEED DUNINC ORYffiATHER. NO PLANNNG WLL OCCUR IN FROZEN GROUNO.6. PLANNNGS WLL BE COMMENSURATE WTH ALL NOES AND SPECIFICATIONS ON ffIS PLAN. OWNERSREPRESENTATIW WLL BE ON SITE OURINC PLANTING OPERANONS TO NNALIZE EXACT LOCATIONSOF ALL PLANTS BASED UPON SPECINC HrcROLOGIC AND SITE REQUIREMENTS,7, SEED H1LL 8E MIXED IN HE SPECIREO PROPORNONS BY MIGHT AND DOCUMENT frE WNDOR.SCUMENTE OT ANALYSIS. SEEO WLL 8E APPLIEO BY THE BROADCAST METHOD AT THE RATESPECIFIED. SEEDING WLL TAKE PLACE AFTER ALL OHER PLANTING IS COMPLEE' ALL SEEDEDAREAS WIL BE HNRO-MULCHED WTH A TACKIFIER OR COWRED V{TH AN EROSION CONMOLBLANKET TO REDUCE EROSION.8. ALL DUE CARE WLL BE TAKEN DURINO HE SIE PREPARAI1ON AND PLANTING WOR( TO AVOIDCOMPACION OF SOILS.9. IHE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CAREFUL INSTALLATION. MAINTENANCE(INCLUDING WAERING). AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SEEDED AREAS AND ALL INSTALLED PLANTiranRrALs. ALL pLAiiTs SHALL aE GUARANEED 8Y THE coNRAcToR To REMAIN ALIVE ANDHEALTHY FOR A 12 MONTH PERIOD. BEYOND 12 MONTHS, NE OMER ltllL 8E FOR RESPONSIBLErON NEPUCIHC WGETANON, PREVENTING EROSION. AND MAINTAINING THE PROPER FINCION OTTHE BASIN IN COMPLIANCE WB THE MAINTENANCE PLAN. PLANINGS SHALL BE MONITORED FOR A3.YEAR PERIOD AND MUST HAW A 50' SURVVAL RAIE.BBts NoN- oRcANlc REMOVE COMPLETELY)MULCHSLITS IN ORGANICFACILITATE ROOT(P) TREE LINETREESTO--l\NOES:1- WAER IHOROUCHLY AFER INSTALLAIION'EXISNNG SUBGRADE, TO AVOIDSETILING DO NOT EXCAVATEDEEPER ftAN ROOIS(E) PAVEDPARKING LOT2. FOR PLANNNG 8ED INSTALLATION EXCAVAIE ENNRESHRUB 8ED AS SHOM ON PROJECT DRAWNGS'IIII-1(P) 10' WDEUTILITY EASEMENTTO PUBLIC R.O.W.(P) 15' wDEACCESS EASEMENTTO PUBLIC R.O.W.SHRUB DETAI-_--\\\\NOT TOQ'PLANTING PLANPLANT LISTSWBOTCOMMON NAMESCIENI|NC NAMEsrzE (MTNTMUM)NOTESTREES _ EWRGRIENCTAtlontlc hlt€ CedorChomo€clporls thyoides6' TO 8'TALLNANVE6to6. TO 8' TALL4Eostern Rsd cadorJuniperus drqlniono6' TO 8. TALLNAIW8LANOSCAPE SHRUBSRMRoseboy Rhodod€ndronRhododendron moximum3'To 4'HGTNANW6Beoch Plum3' TO 4'HGTNAIW5Hiohbush Blu€berYVocclnlum corfbosum3. TO C HGTNATIW8Northern BolboryMylco penstvonico3' TO 4'HGTNANVEIAmericon Cronberry BushMburn!m trilobum3,TO 4'HGTNANW7ChokeberryJ'TO 4,HGTNATIW4sCALEl(22x34)(11x17)l.o'FLATBOTTOM10. IHE PROJECT DESICNER WLL PROVIDE AUPON COMPLENON OF BE RESTORAIIONPLANNNG REPOR1 TO ffE CONSERVATON COMMISSIONAREA.SEE PLANSEE PLANFINISHEDGRADEEROSION CON'IROL BLANKETTO BE USEO ON 2:1 SLOPESIN VEGETAIED SWALES.11. ffE MINCANON AREA. DEFINED IN ffE TANDSCAPE PLAN. SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS A NAruRALAREA IN PERPETUITY.12. ALL INVASIW SPECIES REMEDIATION TO FOLLOW PROPER SAFETY AND ENVRONMENTALGUIDEIINES. ALL CUT INVASIVE TO BE REMOVED OFF-SITE AND DISPOSED OF PROFERLY.LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE1. ANNUAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE MAY BE REQUIRED TO CONNOL UNDESIRED AND INVASIVEPLANT SPECIES.2. INsPEcnoN oF lHE LANOSCAPE PLANTS SHALL OCCUR ONE O) NME PER MONTH FOR THE FIRSTEAR. ffIS INSPECTION SHOULD INCLUDE AN ASSESSMENT OF PLANT HEALTH AND VIGOR ANDERADICATION OF ANY VIEEDS. INVASIVE PLANTS. OR ,VOLUNTEER" PLANTS THAT MAY SPROUT'3. ALL ruRF AREAS SHALL BE MOM. MAINTAINED, AND REPAIRED AS NEEDED.4. NAN\€ PLANTS MAY BE AODEO AS NECESSARY IN ]HE EWNT OF PLANT LOSS'AA4,, TOPSOIL, FERTILIZE AND SEED SIDE SLOPES AND BOTTOM WTH NEW ENGLANDERosroN coNTRoL,/ RESToRAIIoN Mlx FoR DETENTIoN BASINS & Molsr slrEsBY NEW ENGLAND WETLAND PLANTS, INC. OR APPROVED EOUAL (1LBS/250 SF)VEGET2345SCALE:
PreTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4Boy Roodsuit€ 200MA 01035Eulldlng AiHodley,Ph: (413)320-4918CoNSULIANISTSTAMP:DAIE: 12/28/2022DRAWN: BLM/STZCHECK: JMMNEJSCALE: SEE PLANPROPERTY UNEOFFSTT PI/.Nazo|YozI=eUcdoa=qoUUEozt-=eoouugztr=dooegzEctroqdczE=/oo@uozt--=u0ovozL=tdFdoNozoo@EEEiH:sEb1HHHBEEEHilHEo>J6=" Hgq;5et o<l l-JoB NO.: 17-056SHEET TITLE:A-650-1 4tso-l3 /\cfq50-1 0LI1l+€(uo-u I[Jr50-7(- 50-94J\)/ 50-_96a\/ i(,-/,\1Itl50-97I),/nr/50-1 92(- 50-1 94*)q)I\I2so-188(,^50-1 9B50-1 97o,/50-187cQ-o()f)-)395,9""S4/\(I\)/3{)(I)\-t,", ILI2uEoozodtzoJt1Iq)\)(;()\)I({)DD'..21(L)I{,-\\:\\1I)(IA\\)\(\(rl\(:- ,it / \-/.i+({IlI)J tl)clt\IT\RbI\t.?)I50-1\iL1t)ROMAN CATHOUC BISHOPOF FALL RNEN PARISHc/o sT. plug xP.O, BOX 2577LOCUSN/FFA[l ntvER, MA 02722MAP 50 LOT 189.1ARE{ = 4.4AC!/{)*t-LOCUSLINE/)c)I,50-2)I\(P) 1ZONE't5'*AND TREEBUFFER ZONE(souTH &)),,1osa"., I!yL- -\{(tl\(P) FENCED50-1 84.1.1u\wTHrN , /enui /CLOCK TOWERLEASE+2-34-('/ 42-37.1\-\cl)IItT,,4\,-iI- I( --)-I(\ lt.15'EASEMENTOR.O.W.{tI()Jlo+-{01\\\\\\r_\\\\B)It--EASEMENT\-\50-1 75(xr- -l.- t- \/ .--t--- --- / -I - -\\ --"-)\so-r, -- -=-\ ,. \:_.-'.-/ - \ \\\\ 6-..]\ -\{0(\Bt\I"s"{i?Ibsv()-\.9()-:)(-*\\.\n/I42-33.1 IIY.* ,/(lt-t(L((L.tt\\-)\\((o /\\,1:A\J\\ ,/oPROPERTY LINE OFFSET(22x34't(11xl7)SCALE:1"-160'432PARCEL+2-33.1+2-3842-3942-3950-0250-0350-0450-0550-0650-0750-0850-0950- 1050-1 150-1 450-1550- 16so-1750-9550-9650-9750-9850-10050-1 0150-'il 7.150-1 7150-17250-17250-17450-1 7550-'t84.1.150-18550-18650-18650-1 8850- 1 89.150-19050-1 9150-1 9150-1 9150-19'l50-1 9250-1 9350-1 9450-1 9450-1 9550-1 9650-19750-19750-1 98NOTE: DISTANCES ABOVE BASED UPONBUILDING STRUCTURES (2_D, FROM ORTHOIMAGERY) (JUNE 2OI7), PREPARED BY OFFICEOF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (MASSGIS),COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. MASSITDISTANCE FRoM (P) TOII/ER CEN.IER680'+488'+451'+ (BUTLDING 1)469'+ (BUTLDING 2)701':t+25'*.506'+602'+571'r+87'+406'+433'*+76'+545'+565'+676'+668'*663':r673'1742'+577'+463'+374'+.+26'+533'1328'*451'+490'+499'*478'+ (BUTLDTNG 1)sl1'+ (BUTLDTNG 2)521'!.571'*.250'*339'+ (BUTLDTNG 1)404'+ (BUTLDTNG 2)277'+167'+ (CHURCH ON LOCUS)259'*.1 34'*164'1188'+277'+330'+292'+214'+ (BUTLDTNG 1)2s0'+ (BUILDTNG 2)39t'r324'+365'+ (BUILDING 1)379'+ (BUTLDTNG 2)4s1'+(BUTLDTNG r)(BUTLDTNG 2)(BUTLDTNC 3)(BUTLDTNG 4)
DESIGN GROUP, LLCProTefta4Building A;HodlsrBoy RoodSult€ 200MA O1OJ5Ph: (41 3)320-4918SHEET TITLE:SIfliVCEI,EVATIONSDATE: 12/28/2022SCALEi SEE PLANDRAW\!: BLM/STZ)HECK: JMM/TEJCONSULTANTS;zo6vFozE*EifilslHE\' (!Eb:HHHHEEH$ilHEI>JYJU'irtA3;g&l o<l FSTAMP:JoB Noj 17-056SE.1ANDELEV. 1NOTE:ONLY ONE SECTOR VIEW ISSHOWN FOR CLARITY. REFERTO SHEETS FOR CA_1 ANDCA_3 FOR CARRIER EQUIPMENTootuU=oozz=L<Lz<"FUzfooE3YL--9i,OIoo'a:i-UOHgE=qQoazI>vo^LHl1 ^\<-* NAVD88.(ASSUMED STREET.ELEVAIION, ROUTE 28).IIL___--JFEMA FLOOD (ZONE AE)1OO YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ANDLAND SUBJECT TO COASTALsroRM FLoWAGE. 11' (NAVD88)IINNri0!ioiNNNo\otrj:Lo r0 20o0BSITING ELEVATIONc3020TIID001000SITING ELEVATIONSECTION LINE W_EJ3020'1011100005J45-1+00 -o+809SITING ELEVATIONSECTION LINE N_S_,_j9_l1 +00-loo+Ica, SECTION LIN0SCALE:1'=4O'1 "=80'1x10702261211BD+IfiiSECTOR VIEW ISFOR CLARITY. REFERSHEETS FOR CA_'I ANDFOR CARRIER EQUIPMENTMOUNT DETAILS.aN!JGt=sa@tooeu=oFozzF5oi2"Fztooe;UIIFi=ouo,e14rEg@9_uXaico-t9-11 o(lAjN.1IELEV. 13,_- -T--(ASSUMED STREETELEVATION, ROUTE 28)IINAVD88t____-___lsroRM FLoWAGE. 11' (NAVD88)l(zoNE AE)PLAIN ANDLAND SUBJECT TO COASTALFEMA FLOOD1OO YEAR FLOODNocdNN.jN@doc-jooNrNoniI +000+800+400+00-0+40HORIZONTAL31 +00o+800+400+00-0+40-1+00 -0+80A
ProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4 BoY RoodBuildlnq A; Suit€ 200Hodlex MA 01055Ph: (413)320-4S18eoNsullArv-I5iSTAMP:DATE: 12/28//2022DRAWN: BLM/STZCHECK: JMM/TEJSCALE; SEE PLANzoaOz!=eUIuoo!d.oU&ozt-=cootozL=udo&ozI,=eUooEozE&ooatoztr=tUIotozt-=eIFoNoNNNoNNozoNm6EIEi,ilEI3EEH tEHEEI>J76=3HE&l o<l FJOB NO.: 17-056DETAII,f'D-1SHEET TITLE:2NOTE:A LOCK BOX WTH GATE KEYSSHALL 8E PROVIDED FOREMERGENCY PERSONNEL ACCESS.6x6 PT WOOD OR 4" O.DSCH4O METAL POSTSvcAPS, 8' o.C., MAX.3" #2 CEDAR OR WOODSLATS, STAIN OR SEAL GREYTO PROTECT FROM ELEMENTSHORIZONTAL CROSSMEMBER (INSIDE), 5 PL.SECURE CURTAIN TO SLATS ANDPOSTS PER MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS3" #2 CEDAR OR WOoDSLATS, STAIN OR SEAL GREYTO PROTECT FROM ELEMENTSSOUND MITIGATION SHIELD MOUNTEDHORIZONTALLY ON FENCE INTERIOR (ONLY FORSOUND ATTENUATING AROUND (P) GENERATORS.SEE PLAN VIEW FOR LOCANONS)BACK25OO PSI CONCRETE12"0, IYP.(CONCRETE REQUIREDFoR METAL POSTS ONLY)6x6 PT wooD oR 4" o.D.SCH4O METAL POSTSw/cAPS, 8' 0.C., MAX.3" #2 CEDAR OR W00DSLATS. STAIN OR SEAL GREYTO PROTECT FROM ELEMENTSHORIZONTAL CROSSMEMBER (INSIDE), 3 PL.25OO PSI CONCRETE12"0, ilP.5SOUND MITIGATION SHIELD (PER "ENVIRONMENTALSOUND ASSESSMENT,, PREPARED BY MODELINGSPECIALITIES) MOUNTED HORIZONTALLY ON FENCEINTERIOR (ONLY FOR SOUND ATTENUATING AROUND1e1 crterierons. sEE PLAN vtEw FoR LocATloNS)SECURE CURTAIN TO SLATS ANDPOSTS PER MANUFACTURER,SRECOMMENDATIONS434" O.D. SCH4O GALVSTEEL PIPEw/cAP (7'H)LOCKABLE LATCHASSEMBLYCATE KEEPERGATE ASSEMBLYWTH GALV.STEEL PIPEFRAME (INSiDE)ACAST STEEL GALV.HINGE ASSEMBLY, 4 PL.AA<-6x6 PT WOOD OR 4" O.D.SCH4O METAL POSTSw/cAPS, 8'O.C., MAX.3" #2 CEDAR OR WOODSLATS, STAIN OR SEAL GREYTO PROTECT FROM ELEMENTSHORIZONTAL CROSSMEMBER (INSIDE), 3 PL.25OO PSI CONCRETE12"A, rYP.(CONCRETE REQUIREDTE OPENING 12,(VERIFY WTH SITE PLAN)DDFOR METAL POSTS4,, THICK SURFACE COURSE OF1_1/2,, DENSE GRADE CRUSHEDSTONE OR HARDPACK GRAVEL FOR>7.52 SLOPES (MASS DOT M2.01.1)FRONT (oursrpE) vtEwCROWN OR PITCHAS NOTED ON PLANGEOTEXTILE REINFORCEMENTAS REQUIRED OVER WEAKSUBBASEEXISTING PROOF_ROLLEDSUBGRADE, BANK RUN GRAVELOVER PARENT MATERIAL12'' THICK GRAVEL SUBBASE(MASS DOT M1.03.0 TYPE B)AEACK (tNSrpE) VIEWSCALEI NONE3/4" rO 1-1/2" SURFACE SToNE(MASS Dor M2.01.1, M2.01.2, M2.01.3,M2.01.4. OR APPROVED EQUAL)oIcz(CONCRETE REQUIREDFOR METAL POSTS ONLY)FRONTSECTION A_ASTOCKADE FENCENONEcE1dz=CURTAIN OVERLAIDOVER POST, TYP.6"ox'18" DEEP CONC.FOOTTNG WTH 1 1/+" PtPESLEEVE, 6,' L18"6, 2 PL-ccIcttr4" TH|CK (MrN.) 3/4" CLEANWASHED STONE (ASTM #57,MASS DOT M2.01.4, ORAPPROVED EOUAL) (EXTENDED12., OUTSIDE OF FENCING TOEDGE OF DIAPHRAGM)SCALE:MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC 14ONOR APPROVED EQUALREMOVE (E) TOP SO|L & SUBSOIL. REPLACEWTH CLEAN STRUCTURAL FILL INACCORDANCE WTH RECOMMENDATIONSWTHIN GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (BY OTHERS)(E) PARENT MATERIAL,PROOF ROLLED SUB_GRADE6"0 scH40 c.s. PIPE.FILL WTH CONCRETE(AT 4000 Psr)+ RUNOFF47"4zGRADEBOLLARDSCALE:NMIRAFI 14ONFILTER FABRIC ORAPPROVED EQUALJ/8', DOUBLE WASHEDPEA GRAVEL(MASS DOT M2.01.6OR APPROVED EQUAL)1A"612" -----4NOTE:PEA GRAVEL DIAPHRAGM SHALL BE INSTALLEDAROUND DOWNHILL SIDE OF FENCED COMPOUND.PEADIAPHRAGMNOTES:t. ALL GRAIluLln MATERIALS SHALL 8E COMPACTED TO s51% MAXIMUM DRY DENSITYBY STD, PROCTOR METHOD2, ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES TO BE COVERED WTH JUTE MESH EROSION CONTROLBLANKETS AND/OR HYDROSEEDED WTH NEW ENGLAND ROADSIDE MATRIX MIX AT35LBS PER ACRE OR EQUAL.3. IF GROUNDWATER IS INTERCEPTED, A SUBDRAIN OUTLETTED TO DAYLIGHT SHALL BEREQUIRED. CONTACT ENGINEER FOR SUITABLE DETAIL.DRIVEWAY SECTION TAScALf: NoNENEW ENGLAND EROSION CONTROL/RESTORATION MIX FOR DRY SITES BYNEW ENGLAND WETLAND PLANTS, INC.OR APPROVED EOUAL (1LBS/1250 SF)4" (MrN,) COMPACTED DEPTH OF TOPSOIL, FERTILIZE& LIME IN ACCORDANCE WTH SPECIFICATIONSD5, WDE EMERGENCY OVERFLOWSPILLWAY SHEARFORCE-'IO TURFREINFORCEMENT MATTOP OF BERM ELEV=9.00SPILLWAY ELEV=7INFILTRATION BASIN SIDE SLOPES ANDSEDIMENT FOREBAY SHALL HAVE 4" (MIN.)TOPSOIL WTH AT LEAST 4Z ORGANICS.INFILTRATION BASIN BOTTOM SHALL HAVE AFREE DRAINING SANDY LOAM SOIL. FERTILIZEAND SEED SIDE SLOPES AND BOTTOM WITHNEW ENGLAND EROSION CONTROL/RESTORATIONMIX FOR DETENTION BASINS & MOIST SITES BYNEW ENGLAND WETLAND PLANTS. INC. ORAPPROVED EQUAL. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROLBLANKET FOR STABILIZATION.BB1 5"rFLEXTERRA FGM HYDRAULICALLYAPPLIED MULCH & EROSION CONTROLBLANKET MANUFACTURED BY PROFILEPRODUCTS, LLC BUFFALO GROVE, IL.SEE TABLE FOR APPLICATION RATES.NOTE:HYDRAULICALLY APPLIED MULCHBLANKET OR DOUBLE STRAWTYPE EROSION CONTROLBLANKET MAY BE UTILIZED AS ASLOPE TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE.SCARIFY SURFACEOF SUBGRADE TO2,, DEPTHSEDIMENTFOREBAYELEV=7.75RUNOFF4" SCH4O CAPPEDMAINTENANCE PIPE+N=hFLEXTERRA APPLICATIONRATESSLOPERATELESS .Il.|AN 4:12500 tB/AC4r1 TO 3:130oo LBIAC311 fO 2t1J500 LBIAC2t1 fO 1il4ooo LBIACIMPERVIOUS CORE MATERIALWTH PERMEABILITY LESS THAN1o^(-5lCMlsEc) THRoUGHOUTENTIRE BASIN BERM- --T-BASED ON,,SUBSURFACE U"' O*O''O*-]REPORT" PREPARED BY TOWER ENGINEERINGPROFESSIONALS, INC. DATED JULY 2, 2021,SEASoNAL HIGH GROUNDWATER=3.2' BELOW(E) GRADE (ELEV. 4.8+ NAVD88)INFILTRATIONSCALE:DOES NOT INCLUDE FCCREGULATED SIGNAGE PER THECARRIERS FEDERAL LICENSE.EMERGENCYCONTACTNSCALE:4523EXISTINGUNDISTURBEDSUBGRADEtht dt tt ow6d n.t aatt3d b!t aatryt&.whr'!nE,L,'C.,'r1 i" ^r tuctztofr,teetqdote(lt!) 96o'7ttt orhrcbtua.hrto?u.snw.bluc*.Yto?*sEBST SltelMA-s104SOUTH YARMOUTHFCG Towerro, N/ANo TresPacelngFSor ruito*'lr.dm r. tulFd.Ylobtcl wtlt t Dmbd to tha lr[.rt qtalrt ol ttr. !fi.
Pro'IerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4Bulldlng A:HodlenBoy Roodsulto 200MA 01035Ph: (413)32O-4916CONSULIANISiSfAMP:DATE: 12/28/2022DRAy/]tv: BLM/STZCHECK: JMM/TEJSCALE: SEE PLANco-APPUCUIIDETAIISzo6UvFoEEEigIEJOEb1HHHFiEE9>Jfi=trl/)"r iE3 nget o{l FJOB NO.: 17-056cA-'lSHEET TITLE:235T(P)WTHICE BRIDGERF CABLESCO.APPLICANT INFORMATIONSITE NUMBER: 4HY06o4HlF'.Mobile'T_MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLC15 COMMERCE WAYSUITE BNORTON, MA 02766(P)ONPROPANE GENERATOR4'x10' CONCRETE PADDD(MlN. ELEV=1J.6' NAVD88)WTHIN 9'x15' LEASE AREA(REMOTE EMERGENCYDISCONNECT REQUIRED FOR> 2OKVA GENERATOR)-lEQUIPMENT SIZE ANDNUMBER SHALL BECONFIRMED WTH FINALRF DESIGN.(P) 8'x14' CoN0RETE PAD (MlN. ToP oFCONCRETE ELEVATION =13.6' NAVD88)3' (CONCRETE PAD)(P) 6' H|GH souNDMITIGATION SHIELD,DESIGN BY OTHERSAH3, (LEASE AREA)IIIIIL_____lGPS ANTENNA:5"H x 3.2"0(P) CABINETTYP-EGRESS LIGHTCONTROLLEDBY NMER FORMAINTENANCETECHNICIANS(P) UNDERCROUNDUTILITIESPANEL ANTENNASIERICSSON AIR6449 B41:33.1"H+ X 20.5"W+ X 8.5"0+REMOTE RADIO HEAD:ERICSSON 4480 871+885:21.8"Ht x 15.7"W* x 7.5"D:tERICSSON 4460 825+866:19.6"H+ x 15.7"W* x 12.1"D*oFGPS ANTENNAON ICE BRIDGEERTCSSON 840590966 (OCTO):95.9"H+ x 23.1"W* x 7.1"D*NOTE:TYPICAL EOUIPMENT SIZES SHOWN.ACTUAL EOUIPMENT MAY VARY.ANTENNAEQUIPMENT /'\ccGROUND EQUIPMENTbSCALE:SCALET NoNE1"-6'SECTOR A0'POST CAPGRIP STRUT ICEPROTECNON(P) CLoCK ToWERBBICE BRIDGE KIT POSTSSPACED 8,_0,' MAX.3 LEVEL ANGLEBRACKET TRAPEZERRU, TYP. OF 2 PERSECTORPIPE-MOUNTED(6 ToTAL),BEHIND RFTRANSPARENT MATERIALSECTOR G24o',A.NCHORSECTOR B120'CONCRETEPANEL ANTENNA, IYP. OF 2PER SECTORPIPE-MOUNTED(6 ToTAL),BEHIND RFALTERNATEANCHORING DETAILTRANSPARENT MATERIALCONCRETEFOOTINGICE BRIDGEANTENNA PLANSCALE: NONE2J45AoscALE: 1"-3' (22xJ4)1'=6' (11x17)
ProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4Buildlnq A;Hodley,Boy RoodSuite 200MA 01035Ph: (41 5)J2o-4918CONSULIANTS;STAMP:DATE: t2/28/2022DRAWN: BLM/STZCHECK: JMM/|EJSCALE; SEE PLANco-APPUCAXTDETAII:;zoauEO===tIuoo=qqouozEdUco@xoztrF=ecoEoztr=&do@eozEdco6Utozt-=ecoeoztr=dFoozNEEEi,lilsl3EbLl|EHHEHEEo>J76=. Hpq;5et oJoB NO.: 17-056cA-2SHEET TITLE:35236KW PROPANE GENERATORoN 4'x10' CoNCRETE PADMODELRBS 6102MANUFACTURERERICSSONWDTH51.2"DEPTH27.6"HEIGHT57.1"WEIGHT (WTHOUTBATTERIES)728 LBS.CO.APPLICANT INFORMATIONlF.'MobileSITE NUMBER: 4HYO604H. l;%%'Ji,?J.T$l?sr' LLcSUIIE BNORTON, MA 02766DDPLANATTACH RBS CABINETTO BASE FRAME PERMANUFACTURER,SGUIDELINESMODEL37SS340400MANUFACTURERDELTAWDTH20"DEPTH10"HEIGHT40"WEIGHT75 LBS.cCANCHOR TO CONCRETE PAD PERMANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINESRBS BASE FRAME (DIMENSIONS T8D).ANCHOR TO CONCRETE PAD PERMANUFACTURER.S GUIDELINESEQUIPMENTGDETAILSCALE: NONECABINETPOWER PROTECTIONCABTNET (PPC)SCALEI NONEGROUND TANK PER NFPA 54.NFPA 58 AND MASSACHUSETTSFUEL GAS CODEPROPANE FILLIOUTLET PORTMAINTAIN 10, MINIMUM CLEARANCEFROM IGNITION SOURCE5OO CALLON PROPANE TANK(3.1'*W x 9.9'+L x 3.8'+H).FINAL DIIVENSIONS BASED ONTANK MANUFACTURER PROVIDEDBY PROPANE TANK SUPPLIER.BBMAINTAIN MINI[IUMNEC-COMPLIANT WORKSPACECLEARANCE 30,, WOE, 36"DEEP, 6,_6.' HEIGHTCAST.IN_PLACE CONCRETE PAD(MrN. ELEV=13.6' NAVD88)MODELRAC-24MANUFACTURERPURCELLWDlH25.4"DEPTH20,o"HEIGHT24.O" (37.1"WTH PLINTHWEIGHT85 LBS,388 LBS.(EMPTY)(MAx.)II,,. .JIIrIIl_rIIttII,l=lIIllll:MODELDUBBM-2ALMMANUFACTURERMFS DATA SERVICESWDTH28.54"DEPTH28.54"HEIGHT (1 UNIT)29.67"HETGHT (3 UN|TS)89.01 "rllSIDE FRONTNOTES:I. TTIT PNOPENS SYSTEIj IS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWNG AS A SCHEI/ATIC ONLY.A LICENSED GAS FITTER SHALL OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS ANDCONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WTH THE UTILITY PURVEYOR ANDMASSACHUSETTS FUEL GAS CODE AS NECESSARY.2. PRoVIDE ICE BRIDGE PROTECTION OVER INLET/FILL VALVE AS REQUIRED.BATTERY BACK.UPCABTNET (BBU)PURCELL CABINETAPROPANETYPICALT_MOBILETIONSINCABINET352oaFRONToaDISCONNECT REQUIREDcA-2E/o\\cA-2lSCALE: NONESCALE: NONESCALE: NNE4CONCRETE PADA
ProTer(aDESIGN GROUP, LLC4 Boy RoodEulldlno A: Sult€ 2o0Hoilse MA 01035Phr (413)J2o-4918CoNSULTANISTSTAMP:DATE: 12,/28/2022DRAWN: BLM/STZCHECK: JMM/TEJSCALE: SEE PIANSHEEI TITLE:co-tpPucttttDWAIUizo@tut,lzl-16rE<1.Ylz.lE!-r l=dlr!4lioUdozt-=dooUUuozt-=&ooeozL=&doaUEozE=EdoUuozt-=doFoo"l-NnEEEifilFIEEHHtBIEEo>JEi3HE&l o<l FJOB No.: 17-056cA-3J45TYP. OF 2PER SECTORTOTCO.APPLICANT I NFORMATIONgatatSITE NUMBER; MA-5104NEW CINGULAR WRELESS PCS, LLC('AT&T")550 COCHITUAIE ROADFRAMINGHAM, MA 01701SECTOR A340'RF3 M\N.DD(P) oLOCK TowERSECTOR GffiFHffi'220',REFER TO CURRENTRFDS FOR RFEOUIPMENT SPECIFICSRRU, TYP. OF 4 PER SECTOR(12 TOTAL), PIPE_MOUNTED BEHINDRF TRANSPARENT MATERIALSECTOR Bo€TOPoSURGE SUPPRESSOR:18.2"+H x 10.2"+W x 51.4"*DPIPE-MOUNTEDSURGE SUPPRESSOR,TYP. OF 2HPANEL ANTENNA:71,2"+H x 21.0":tW x 7.8"+D71.2"tH x 2O.7"w'l x 7.7" *DFRONT SIDEREMOTE RADIO HEAD:18.1"*H x 13.4"aW x 82"1D16.5"+H x 13.4"+W x 5.9":tD17.9"+H X 13.1"+W X 9.4"tD14.9'1H x 13.2"1w x 10.9"+DGPS ANTENNA:S":tH x 3.2"*DcNOTE:TYPICAL EQUIPMENTACTUAL EQUIPMENTSIZES SHOWN,ANTENNAUIPMENToGROUND TANK PER NFPA 54,NFPA 58 AND MASSACHUSETTSRJEL GAS CODEPOST CAP24GALLON PROPANE TANKGRIP STRUT ICEPROTECTIONPRoPANE FILL/oUTLET PORTMAINTAIN 1O' MINIMUM CLEARANCEFROM IGNITION SOURCE(J.t'rw x 9.9'*L x 3.8'*H).FINAL DIMENSIONS BASED ONTANK MANUFACTURER PROVIDEDBY PROPANE TANK SUPPLIER.BBJ LEVEL ANGLEBRACKET TRAPEZECAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE PAD(MrN. ELEV=13.6' NAVD88)ICE BRIDGE KIT POSTSSPACED 8'-0,, MAX.ANCHORCONCRETE PADNOTES:I. +IT PROPNIE SYSTEM IS SHOW! ON THIS DRAWNG AS A SCHEMATIC ONLY.A LICENSED GAS FITTER SHALL OBTAIN ALL REOUIRED PERMITS ANDCONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WTH THE UTILITY PURVEYOR ANDMASSACHUSETTS FUEL GAS CODE AS NECESSARY.2. PROVIDE ICE BRIDGE PROTECTION OVER INLET/FILL VALVE AS REOUIRED.ALTERNATEANCHORING DETAILAICE BRIDGEPROPANEPAD34cA-3SCALE: NONE2CONCRETEFOOTINGSCALE: NONE
Pro'IerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4 BoY RoodBulldlno Ai Suit6 200Ho;l€, MA 01035Ph: (4lJ)320-4918CONSULTANTS:STAMP:DATE: 12,/28/2022DRAWN: BLM/STZCHECK: JMM/TEJSCATE: SEE PLANSHEET TIILE:c0-tpPucAl{tDYTAIISqzo=UdoztrF=eo&oo-6ouozt-=dUcouozt-=euoaEozL=dIoatozF=Eco6utozt-=eooeozEEdFoCEEEiFIHEl'ato1HHEEXEEo>Ja-., H8q;Hst o<i l-JOB NO.: 17-056cA-42J45CO.APPLICANT INFORMATIONgat&t\=r'SITE NUMBER: MA-5104NEW CINGULAR WRELESS PCS, LLC("Ar&r")550 COCHIIUATE ROADFRAMINGHAM, MA 01701DD. ExternalDimenslons.80'x80'x113'. lntemalDimensions.72'x72'x105'EGRESS LIGHTS ONWALK_IN CABINETFOR MAINTENANCETECHNICIANS. NEQ 19737includeg below)LOWEST HORIZONTAL MEMBER OFWALK_IN CABINET 14.6' NAVD88(z-MIN. ABoVE ADJUSTED BASEccFLOOD ELEV=1 1'+1.5'+2':1 4.5')STEEL SUPPORTLEG KIT, TYP.\\(P) 6'-8"x6'-8" wALK-lN EQUIPMENTOABINET oN (P) 8'-8"+x11'-0"+CONCRETE PAD OR CONCRETE PIERS(MIN. TOP OF CONCRETE PADELEV= 1 3.6' NAVD88)(P) HVAC UNITIT(P) DcBREAKER BOXINTEGRATED SHUTOFFII1 5kW(AS REaUIRED)PROPANE GENERATOR(P) 6' H|GH SOUNDMITIGATION SHIELD,DESIGN BY OTHERS----1I(LEASE AREA)(P) AT&T PROPANEGENERATOR ON 4'x6'CONCRETE PAD3'ANCHOR TO CONCRETE PAD PERMANUFACTURER,S GUIDELINES10' MtN. TO(c0NcRErE)BBUILDINGPENETRATIONSISOMETRIC VIEW(MlN. ELEV=13.6' NAVD88)&,INTAKESI(P) AT&T 2so sF------i(P) AUToMATTCTRANSFER SWTCHWITH 3' CLEARANCELEASE AREA(P) PPC WTH3, CLEARANCE!IIIl.crosic}EG$T-T---(P) RF CABLINO RUNALONG ICE BRIDGE TOTOWER(P) DTRECT ArRcooLrNG (DAC)HAC,lit9;lmi3sni/ti\@(P) ICE BRIDGE WTHGPS ANTENNA:O2rmlfil&EPLANlsli|34i.ni54'lt:{kFis*!NOTE: 6'-8" X 6'-8" EQUIPMENT SHELTER FOR AT&T WRELESSSERVICES BY VERTIV SHOWN. VERIFY MAKE AND MODEL WTHCONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTIONAGROUND EQUIPMENT235SMARTMOD UE . PRODUGT GONFIGURATION6 X 6 WALK IN CABINET - ASSEMBLY DRATYINGTO AVAILABILITY AT TIMEAT&T CARRIER EQUIPMENTSHOWN. VARIATIONS IN CABINET STYLEStarr&wcmrrEw@l.*^r.B'*w..r#b"iltEtawc'n4utloo+'rll!.1il,mtftti{E ffi;4fr5€lP.nbnt ffitoo ErrA t\D. 3Ri IClodlnlxdl*r*O ffid dyldryffitubtVm,mFFFt.cArdqd-bdl{wrcw8tsuw&lr rqwufrMrruil&5iFrtunldL*ffid#)'mffilwcurumG.(rrryxw-lffin (Dtac&rd (o J r ZIH.lcd ku#6 r*r He lF*ilil.-la'a.bN"aHif) verttvcA-4Q"SCALEIPLANEND VIEW4NONEEGSIDE VIEW
EROSION CONTROL NOTES5ProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4 BoY RoodBuildlno A: Sult€ 200Ho;lex MA 01055Ph: (413)J2o-4918CONSULTANIS;STAMP:IDATE: 12/28/2022DRAWN: BLM/STZCHECK: JMM/TEJscALE: SEF PLANSHEET TITLE:EfiOSI0rV C0MROLPLAN & DETAIIf!zot0==EIuooqG.oU&ozEoadozL=uL.1.alq).1"zlzEIEcloil;lElEIEIFIFIFoNNoNozod"1"'l'lEEEEfilEIEE:isEo1HHEHH€3HilHE9>JU'-", Hp3;Het o<l FJOB NO.: 17-056EC-1APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A CELLULARTELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY CONSISTING OF A FENCEDCOMPOUND AND UTILITY WORK WTHIN A LEASE AREA ANDEASEMENTS.TEMPORARY SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL BARRIERSHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT SITE CONSTRUCTION.STOCK PILE ON SITE 1OO FT. OF SILT FENCE FOREMERGENCY USE. TEMPORARY EROSION BARRIERS SHALLREMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL PERMANENT VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVER IS ESTABLISHED.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHIP ALL BRUSH AND SLASHCUTTINGS ON SITE AND STOCKPILE THE CHIPS TO BEUSED ON ALL UNSTABLE, DISTURBED AREAS DURINGCONSTRUCTION AS TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MULCH. NOBURNING WLL BE ALLOWED ON SITE.TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MUST BE PROVIDED TO ANYDISTURBED EARTH THAT IS OPENED UP IN ANY ONELOCATION FOR MORE THAN 14 DAYS. CHIPS FROM LANDCLEARTNG, EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS, OR !A9I-._..GROWNG RYE GRASSES MAY BE USED FOR TEMPORARYSTABILIZATION AS REQUIRED.STRIPPED TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED AND PROTECTEDWTH STRAW MULCH. ALL STOCKPILES SHALL HAVE ANnCpnovEo srLTATtoN BARRIER ToTALLY suRRouNDING THEP HE PILE SHALL BE IN AN APPROVED UPLAND AREAA MINIMUM OF TWENTY_FIVE FEET FROM ALL RESOURCEAREAS.THE PHASING AND SEQUENCING OF THE WORK FOR THESITE PREPARATION FOR THE TELECOMMUNICATIONSEOUIPMENT INSTALLATION CONSISTS OF INSTALLINGTEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLBARRIERS; CLEARING AND ROUGH GRADING AS NEEDED;rouuoerbr woRK; EXcAVATIoN FoR UTlLlrlES; BAoK FIL!FoUNDATIoNS AND UTILITY TRENoHES; FENCED COMPoUNDCONSTRUCTION: INSTALLATION OF TOWER AND GROUNDEQUIPMENT; GROUNDING AND LIGHTNING PROTECTION;eciutpurrr TESTTNG; FTNAL GRADING AND srABlLlzATloNOF DISTURBED AREAS: LOAM AND SEED DISTURBED AREASOUTSIDE COMPOUND; FINAL CLEANUP. THE ESTIMATEDTIME FOR COMPLETION OF THE WORK IS APPROXIMATELYTr\ENTY (20) WEEKS.THE COMPOUND ENCLOSURE IS SURFACED WTH CRUSHEDSTONE UNDERLAIN BY A WEED-BLOCK SYNTHETIC FILTERFABRIC. DRAINAGE PATTERNS, RUNOFF VOLUMES ANDPEAK FLOW RATES WLL NOT BE ALTERED BY THEPROPOSED CONSTRUCTION.ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF THEFENCED COMPOUND SHALL BE PERMANENTLY ESTABLISHEDWTH A NATIVE VEGETATIVE GROUND COVER AT THECONCLUSION OF CONSTRUCTION. GRADED AREAS SHALL BEPROTECTED WTH STRAW MULCH UNTIL A GOODVEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED.THE TOTAL IMPACT AREA OF THE DISTURBEDCONSTRUCTION SITE IS BOUNDED BY THE ,,LIMIT OF WORK"NS SHOWN HEREON. THE MAXIMUM AREA OF DIS1URBANCEWTHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK IS APPROXIMATELY 10'550SQUARE FEET. ]HE PROJECT IMPACT AREA IS BELOW THEeiruptrott IHRESHoLD oF 43,560 souARE FEET lN 40CTN PNNTS g, 122.124 AND THEREFORE IS NOT SUBJECTTO REGULATION UNDER THE EPA NPDES GENERALCONSTRUCTION PERMIT PROGRAM.'10. THE PROJECT OWNER'S GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALLCONDUCT ALL SITE DEVELOPMENT WORK IN A MANNERTHAT DOES NOT EXCEED THE LIMITS OF WORK SHOWN ONTHE PLANS. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROJECT OWNER,SOENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT ALLCousrRucrolt AcrtvtrtEs lN A MANNER THAT DoEs NorRESULT IN STORM WATER DISCHARGES WTH AN ADVERSEIMPACT ON ANY RESOURCE AREAS OR DOWNSTREAMPROPERTIES.11, UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTORSHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SILT FROM BEHINDSILTATION BARRIERS AND DISPOSE OF SILT EVENLY INUPLAND AREAS. REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICESWHEN A GOOD VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED.12. A CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIORTO ANY CONCRETE PLACEMENT ON THIS PROJECT. SIGNSSHALL BE PLACED AS NECESSARY TO CLEARLY INDICATETHE LOCATION OF THE CONCRETE WASHOUT. WASHOUTRESIDUE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE ANDDISPOSED OF AT AN APPROVED WASTE SITE'2.D4.5.6.c8.9.B5'"-l-r--ll2r'(E) WooDEDAREACONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOTES:1. AGGREGATE CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE SHALL 8E INSTALLEDPRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OFEARTH MOVING OPERATIONS.2. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TOBE MAINTAINED UNTIL REMOVED.FULL WDTH OFINGRESS/EGRESS AREAEROSIONCONTROL PLANscAlE: 1"-20' (22xr4) \ rc-t ,/r'=4o'0rx17) \a__-./43Q"tll1At--r'.- + _.I(E) PAVEDPARKING LOTo,II(P) INLETPROTECT!ON(E) UTILITYPOLE, TYP.(P) ERosroN coNrRoLBARRIER ALONG DOWNHILLSIDE OF LIMIT OF WORK2-1TEGEOTEXTILE FUNDER GRAVEL12,, MIN. THICKNESSSCALE:8' TOg*t=ittto(P)LINE,TREEIYP.HOSE CLAMPR=l5' MlDcB1" TOCOARSE{II\]\(E) wooDEDAREA\\---\ \I*o@Rs-\t(P) INLETJPROTECTIONN(P)BASIN,DEWATERINGIF REQUIRED(P)CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE\o' ro a,-----1Two (MrN.) 1"xl"x3' wooD STAKES PERBALE DRIVEN I2'' (MIN.) INTO GRADENONEINERT OR STRAW BASEDBLOWN/PLACED FiLTER MEDIAINSERTREBAR#3L_BRACKETSAREA2.,HEADWDTH WOODENSTAKES PLACED 6, O.C.FTLTREXX S|LT SOXX (8",9",OT 12,' TYPICAL) OR EQUAL.-t--- **-/(P) DRAINAGEEASEMENT./s'\'tr' -Ltil->oREINFORCED'to oz PVcINSERT STAPLESAROUND REBARL_BRACKETS.-- *nn NorEs:I. +IT COICNTrc WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY(E) PAVEDPARKING LOTCONCRETE PLACEMENT ON THIS PROJECT.2. SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED AS NECESSARY TO CLEARLY INDiCATE THELOCATION OF THE CONCRETE WASHOUT.r. iAi corcnrre wAsHour AREA wLL BE REPLAoED AS NEoESSARY To' r,,llrHrerru CAPAoITY FOR WASTE CoNCRETE AND oTHER LIQUID WASTE'+. WISNOUT RESIDUE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM fiE SITE AND DISPOSED OFAT AN APPROVED WASTE SiTE.S. OO IOT MIX EXCESS AMOUNTS OF FRESH CONCRETE OR CEMENT ON_SITE.O. OO IOT WASH OUT CONCRETE TRUCKS INTO STORM DRAINS, OPEN DITCHES,STREETS, OR STREAMS.z. evoto oirt',tptttc Excess coNcRETE lN NoN-DESIcNATED DUMPING AREAS.8. LOCATE WASHOUT AREA AT LEAST 50' (15 METERS) FROM STORM DRAINS'OPEN DITCHES, OR WATERBODIES.g. wnii our u'stEs truro rHE ourPAcK wAsHour AS sHowN wHERE THECONCRETE CAN SET, BE BROKEN UP, AND THEN DISPOSED OF PROPERLY.(P) coNCRETEWASHOUT PIT/gQ/\(E) PAVEDPARKING LOT\\(P) EROSTON CONTROLBARRIER ALONG DOWNHILLSIDE OF LIMIT OF WORK+..-I.t\l\ -- -...., --- .- -o-TREE LINE,8-- '- ---',_.-q _.. '_ /c,\ \ 9---- --*a-+*".'\r -g-'oHW-*ot-l !v -.....-.--SCALE: NoNESET BAC ON FILTER FABRICIF VEGETATION IS ABSENTROUTE 2848" WOOD POSTS6'MAX. O.C.MIRAFI PREFABRICATED SILT FENCE.OR APPROVED EQUAL, INSTALLEDPER MANUFAcTURER,S GUIDELINESSTRAW BALE/SILT FENCESTAKED STRAW BALES END-TO_END.INSTALL ONE BALE PERPENDICULARTO FENCE LINE PER EACH 50 LINEARFEET OF BARRIER.FLOWSPOIL FROMBALE TRENCHWORK SIDEN CONTROLRIERAREA TO BEWORK AREAsrLT soxx / coMPosr MEDIA socKNOTES:I. IISE SITT SOXX WHERE CONDITIONS DO NOT ALLOWSTAKES TO BE DRIVEN.2. SILT SOXX FILL TO MEET FILTREXX SPECIFICATIONSAND APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS.3. SILT SOXX COMPOST MATERIAL TO BE DISPERSEDON SITE, AS DETERMINED BY ENGINEER.4. FILTER MEDIA/STRAW BALES TO BE INERT AND FREEFROM INVASIVE WEEDS AND NON_NATIVE SPECIES.5. MAY STAKE BEHIND SOCK AT SLIGHT ANGLE.PROTECTED SIDE4.UNDISTURBEDGROUNDSTAKED STRAWBALESSTAKESDISCHARGE HOSEUNOTES:A1, ENSURE DISCHARGE AREA IS COVERED BY STABLE VEGETATION.2. USE DIFFUSER NOZZLE OR LOW DISCHARGE RATE TO PREVENT SCOURING.s.ToeEPLACEDATANUPLANDLocATIoNTHATWLLALLowWATERToDRAINToTHEGRoUND.4. SIZE OF STRAW BALE ENCLOSURE TO BE 10'x10' ADJUSTED TO WATER VOLUME'5. ADDITIONAL STRAW BALES MAY BE USED TO INCREASE RETENTION & FILTERING'DEWATERINGJ23EC-1EC-1
6
tfiilirriv@wilNlrrrlvHtlrlilIlmoc 6;\o:ufu o![YNnr - rwr 8!rYH \zurnolot{u[oddGflr| oclAor:nodotrorr ossrio.l,oxuroddjr}flls our/roron no ourflorot{lruoddtl}flr3 @u!flor or'flor ontnor @drfiilltu Hlra)lwl. rrrvn osanslimilrri5tiiihsmi Iaatroxvrr' rrvr u:rvrr @ornoro'xrvruarvn @nnrrrlrnulnoxrctnr @utnorrroaoron @urnorururoaanmrr @urnorolLruouanr'nrr @urnoluruuoaanr'ner @urnor @,/-\./9ilnoul,ri'e-ootfaitlt-, l46v$ilu,41/I\\III/il[tErmfrmffilqq.leq!-r1y'nJ tllIIIl9e\\I/lffinruelv-^-@ro"ut -1lilno87Iu3te,c3-z-Ll0t alnou ttoltollvl{ rulgflnN arsHrnonuvA Hrnos :Enlfi arssill3 uaAor11S9 oNlrslx:lHINOSr90t0 vnr9s!0wl'oNlowu HIHoN90t l$nslilEuls ruvd zsEcl1 'lll sutl ol Dls enlg :lNvrncrdvPJJeloJdc-11 'dnou0 NOlS30
7
6"rstemsRF RePortProposed \)Tireless FacilitYat&tMA10101,A44 Route 28South Yarmouth, MA A2664C Scluarecl SYstems, LLC(r5 Dartrnouth Drivcr\uburn, NLI 03032Phone: (603) 6442800supprirt(4csquarccls)'stem s.comJ"ly 6,2020
TABLE OF CONTENTSl. Overview....2. IntroductionII33. AT&T Mobility Coverage and Capacity Objectives4. Pertinent Site Data5. Coverage Analysis and Propagation Plots7. Statement of Certification ..'......, """ ""LIST OF TABLESTable l: AT&T Mobility site Information Used in coverage Analysis"'..36. Summary.3.6.6,7,...... '''.....3ATTACHMENTSAtrachment l: MAl0l0 -Neighbor sites & Radial Distances"'.Attachment 2: MAl010 - Area Terrain Map'Attachment 3: MAl0l0 - Existing 700 MHz LTE Coverage """""""'Attachment 4: MA1010 - 700 MHz LTE Coverage with Proposed siteAttachment 5: MAl0l0 - Existing 1900 MHz LTE Coverage """""""' """"'12Attachment 6: MAl010 - 1900 MHz LTE Coverage with Proposed site """'13.............8o.......,...1 0...........1 IC Squared Systems, LLCJdy 6,2020
1. OverviewThis RF Report has been prepared on behalf of AT&T for itse lf and on behalf of the First Responde r NetworkAuthority (,,FirstNet,,) in support of its application ro the Town of South Yamouth for the installation and operationof a wireless facility locate d at 1044Route 28 in south Yamouth, MA' The proposed facllity is needed to fiIl acovefag1egap that cufrently exists in AT&T's nerwork, while providing prioritized' preemptive wireless servicesfor first responders,AT&T,s proposal consists of ground-based equipment cabinets and antennas mounted on top of a proposed towerat a height of 100 feet. The proposed Facility has been selectecl by FirstNet as suitable for implementation of theNational public safery Broadband Nenvork (,NpsBN'), while also addressing a substantial gap in 4G LTE coveragefor AT&T's network.This reporr concludes that the proposecl site will provide covefage improvement to areas of south Yarmouth in orderto improve clcficient seryice ur.u, ,long Forest Road, state Highway 2S,LongPond Road and the surroundingroads and neighborhoods in the proximity of the proposed site'Included in this report is: a brief summafy of the site's obiectives, maps showing AT&T's neighboring sites' andpredicted Radio Frequency coverage maps of the subiect site an<i the surrounding sites in AT&T's network'2. IntroductionAT&T is licensed by the FCC to provide wireless communications services throughout the Northeast Regionincluding the Town of south yamouth, MA. AT&T provides rtigrtal voice and daa serviccs using 3rd Generation(3G) UMTS technology in the 800 MHz and 1900 MHz frequency bancls, and is deploying advanced 4th Generation(4G) voice ancl data services over LTE technology in the 7c0 MHz, 850 MHz (Cellular), 1900 MHz (I)CS)' 2100 MHz(A\flS), and,2300MHz flJfCS) bands, u. u[o.uJ by the FCC. The 4G LTE net'work builds on the existing 3G dataservices that utilize uwrs technor.gy. These data networks are used by mobile devices for fast nrcb browsing, mecliastreaming and other applications that require broaclband connections. As part of AT&T's network expansion andenhancement in Massachusefts and elsewhere in the United States, AT&T is filling in existing covefage gaps andaddressing capacity,interference, and high-speed broadband issues. The mobile devices that beneftt from theseadvanced data nerworks are not limited to basic hanclheld phones, but also include devices such as smaflphones'pDA's, tablets, ancl laptop air-cards. rwith the evolving rollout of 4G LTE services and devices' AT&T customefswill have even faster connections to people, informat-ion, and entertainment'FirstNet is a fecleral agency with a mandate to create a nationwide, interoperable public safety broadband nerwork forfirst responders. First responders across the country curtently rely on rnofe than 10,000 separate radio networkswhich oftentimes do not interoperate with one another. By deploying a nationwic{e broadband public safety netw<;tkbuilt specifically to meet the cornmunicadons needs of first responclers, the FirstNet nefwork q'ill provide a solutionto the decadesJclng interoperability and communications .hull"tg.s first responders have experienced' and whichwas highlighted by the 9/1'7 Comrtission's 2004 Final Report'F-irstNet selected AT&T to burlcr, manage and operate the National public safety Broadband Network ('NPSBN')usingFirstNer's Band 14 spectrum (ca[signwQ QE234,20MHz of the700 MFIz spectrum)' togetherwith AT&T',sown wireless nerwork, Using a combination of new ancl existing wireless facilitics, AT&T provides prioritized,preemptive wireless services for first responclefs across Massachusetts, New lingland and nationwide' while als<;C Squatecl Systems, l-LC 1 July 6' 2020
improving 4G LTE coverage for AT&T customers. AT&T works closely with local' state, and federal first respondersin designing the FirstNet network and selecting each nerv site'AT&T's network requires the strategic deployment of antenna sLructufes throughout the atea tcl be covered' whichare connected to receivers and transmittefs that opefate in a limited geographic area known as a "cell"' Mobilesubscriber handsets and wireless devices operate b)'tr^t"miming and receiving low power radio frequency signals toand from these cell sites. The srgnals afe tfansfeffecl through gound telephr:ne lines (or other means of backhaulffansport) and routed to their clestinations by sophisticated electronic equipment' The size <sf the atea served by eachcell site is dependent on sevefal factors inclucling the number of antennas used, the height at which the antennas afedeployed, the topography of the surroundifig land, vegetative cover' and natural or man-made obstructions in thearea. As customers move throughout the service area, th.transmission from the portable device is automaticallytransferred to the AT&T facility with rhe best reception, without interruption in service, provided that there isovedapping coverage between the cells'In order for AT&T,s netuvork to function effectively, there must be adequate ovedapping coverage between the..serving cell" and "adioining cells". This not only allows access to the net'work, but once connected allows for thetransfer or ,,hand-offl, of calls from one celi to another and prevents involuntary disconnecdons or "dropped calls'"AT&T,s antennas also must be located high enough above ground level to allow uansmission (a'k'a' propagation) ofthe radio frequency signals above trees, buildings and other nahual or man-made structufes that may obsttuct ordiminish the signals. Areas without adequate ,udiu fr"q.r"rrcy coverage have substandard service characterized by poorvoice quality, clropped and bbcked calls, slow data connections and transmissions, or no wireless service at all' Thescareas arecommonly referred ttl as "coverage gaps'"r*e have concluded that by instailing the proposed wireless communication facility <;n the proposed towet at 1'044Route 2g at an ^ntennacenteline height of 100.0' AGL (above ground level), AT&T will be able to provide additionalcapacityand coverage improvement to residents, businesses, and tafftccorridors within Yamouttr that are currentlylocated withir-r deficient servtce areas of AT&T's network'2C Squared Systerns, LI-,CJ:u/ry 6,2020
3. AT&T Mobility Coverage and Capacity ObjectivesIn order to expand and enhance their wireless services throurghout New England' AT&T must fill in existing coveragcgaps anci acldress capacity, interference, and high-speed broadbancl issues' As part of this effort' AT&T hasdetermincd that significant gaps in service exist in and around sections of the town of Yamouth, MA, as describedfurther below.AT&T currently operates wireless faciliues similar to the proposed faciliry within Yamouth and the surroundingcities/towns. Due in large part to the distances betwecn the exrsting sites, the intervening topography, and voiumeof *ser traffic in the area,these existing faciliries do not provide sufficient coveragc to porrions of South Yamouth'Specifically, AT&T determined that much of area known as Sourh Yamouth is without relable service in the followingareas and town roads, including but not limited to:r Forest Road;r State Highway 28;. LongPondRoad;r The surrounding roads, neighborhoods ancl businesses in the proxirriry of the prop<lsed site and theabove-mentir-rned road,4. Pertinent Site DataTable 1 below cletails the site-specific inform ailon for the on-air AT&T macro-sites used to perform thecoverage analysis and generate the coverage plots provicled hereinTable t AT&T Mobility site Information used in coverage Analysisl5. Coverage Analysis and Propagation PlotsThe raclio frequency coverage plots providecl in this repoft were procluced using deciBel PlannerrM, a windows-based RF propagation comPuter mocleling Pfogram ancl network planning tool' T'he sclftware takes int<raccount thc geographical features of an area,lancl cover, antenna models, antenna heights' RF transmittingpowef ancl receiver thresholds to preclict covefage ancl other related RF parameters used in site design andwireless network exPansion'I Some sites listed in thrs table are outsicle the plot view but arc inclucled fot conrpleteness of3SiteNameAddressCity/StateLocationAntennaHeight(ft AGL)StructureTyp.StatusLatitudeLongitudeMAl0101044 Route 28SouthYarmouth, MA41.6589-70.2042100TowerProposed SiteMAl119327 Whites PathSotrth Yarmouth, MA41.6905-70.1 886287Self-SuppottOn-AirMA114549 Ocean StreetBarnstable, MA41.6517-70.282180/ 66/BoSelf-Support()n-AirM41290IVIary Dunn RoadBarnstable, MA41.6883-70.281198Water TankOn-AirMA1293-6i Tt'eoptrilus SmithRoadSouth Dennis, MA41.6918-70.1466147Self-SupportOn-AirMhl296480 Buck Island RoadWest Yarmouth, MA41.6626-70.2M7126Water TankOn-AirMA1360u75 Main Street Route 28Dennis, MA41.666970.1 50s150\0ater'lhnkOn-AirM4136782 Shaker House RoadYarmouth Port, MA41.7003-70.2279105PowerStanchion()n-AirC Sqtrared Systerns, LLCinfonnation.l:dy 6,202tt
$rhile AT&T holds licenses in the 700 MI{2, 850 MHz (Cellular), 1900 MI{z €cs)' 2100 MHz (ASilS)' and2300MHz(\gcs) bands, this report fcrcuses on the 700 MI-Iz ancl 1900 MHz layers, which are fePresentativeof the 4G LTE service most readily avallable to AT&T subscribers in South Yamouth' ^nd ^fe the spectrumlayers that are essential to AT&T',s ability to address the coverage needs for their 4G LTE service offerings'The followin gpangtaphs cliscuss each of the AT&T maPS attached hereto'Attachment 1 it)ed ,,MAI0l0 - Neighbor sins dv Badial Distances" provides a view of the subfect area showingthe locations of AT&T,s existing sites within south Yamouth relative to the proposcd facility that may becontributing to the aggregate coverage in South Yamouth'Attachment 2 tit)ed ,,MA1010 - Arua Terain MqP" details the topographical features around the proposed,.MA1010" site. These tenainfeatures play a key .o1" in dictating both the unique covelage areas served froma given location, and the coverage gaps within the network' This map is included to provide a visualrepresentation of the te*ainvariations that must be considered rrrhen detetmining the appropriate location anddesign of a proposed wireless facihq. The blue, green and yellow shacles correspond to iorper elevations'whereas the orange, red, grey and white shades indicate higher cievations'Attachment 3 titled. ,,MA1010 - Existing 700 MIl4 LTE Coaerage" shows the coverage provided to ateas ofsouth yamouth from the ,,on-Air,, sites listed in Table 1 and demonstrates that there are currently gaps in 700MHz LTE coverage effecting service along key toadways, the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses inSouth yamouth. The .uu"r"!" shown is whete the signal strengths atet > -83 dBm (minimum required forreliable, high quality service and perforrn ^nce at700 MHz) and, > -93 dBm (minimum required f<rr adequatelcvel of service ^t.7xaMHz). In an effort to provicle the requircd leveis of coverage to these areas' AT&T isproposing to install a wireless facrlity on the pr.rpo."d towef locate d at 1'0M Route 28 in south Yamouth at anantenna centedine height of 100' (AGL)'Attachment 4fill in the existing coverage gaps and improve AT&T's 700 MHz LTE network within the targeted areas' Asshown by thc aciditional aren, uf .ou.rnge in comparison with the Attachment 3, the proposed faciliry willprovide coverage to:o - L.4 mi aklng Forest Road;o - 1.2 mialong State Highway 28/ I'ongPond Road;o - 0.9 mi along Winslow GraY Road;o - 3,671adclitional residents2 within the surrounding area at the 700 MHz frequency;o - 700 aclditional employees3 within the proximity of the proposed factJity;- 3'500 structures; . r r --r-,--..r^ ^-J L,,^:-^.. ^eooc rrrithin rhe.r I site;The surrounding roacls, neighborhoods, and business areas within the proximity of the proposecAttachment 5 titled"MAl\l| -Exi$ingl900 MH|,LTE Couerage" shows the covetage provided to areas ofSouth yamouth from the ,,on-Air" sites listed in Table 1 and similar to Exhibit 3, demonstrates that there arecufrently gaps in 1900 MHz I-TE coverage in south Yamouth, only to ^greater extent thanat 700 MI'Iz' The2 population counts are based upon 2010 U.S. Censr.rs residential data. Plcasc note that this does notinclude any visitor or vehiclecounts in the area.3llmployec population counts are based upon the 2015 U.S. Census Bureau LEFII) database'C Squared Systems, LLC 4ooJ:u/ly 6,2020
covefage shown is wherc t.hc sig.al stfcngths are > -8(> clBm (minimum lcvel rccluirccl ftrr rcliablc high-clualityscrvicc ancl perfoflnance at 1g00 IUt.Iz) ancl> -g6c1l3rn (thc nrinimurn recluirecl For aclcqr'rak: lcvcl of scrvicc at1900 MIIz),Attachment 6impr<lve AT&T,s 1900 MI Iz I-TII ncnvrirl< within thc targcted arcas. As cviclent wheu compared against llxhibit5, th. lrrup,rrccl facility prrlvicles c()vcfagc itnprovctncnt in S<luth Yarnouth to thc ftllk;wing:o - 1'5 mi along Lr:ng l?ond l{oad;o - 1.2 rni along Statc llighwaY 28;o '* 0.9 tni along Forcst ltoad;o - Z,2Bg ac,lclitional residcnts within rhc surrouncling arca at thc 1900 MI-lz frcclr:enc1';o - 800 aclclitional cmpl<l1'ee5 within the proxirniq' of the proposcd facility;o - 2,1'80 strLtcturcs;o ,l.he surr<-runcling rr>a4s, ncighb<;rhoocls, anci busincss arcas within rhc proximitlt <lf thc pt:rl1:oscd sitc;5C Scluar:crl Systcms, [,]-C).July (r,2t)2t)
6. SummarYln r.rnclcrtaking its builcl-our. of 4G l,TIl setwice in Ilarnstablc oouuty, nT&Thas clctermined that' an additional facilityis nccclccl to pr.vidc rcliablcr service ancl aclclitkrn al capacity throughout areas of South Yamouth' MA' AT&'1'dctcrnrinccl that installing thc proposed wirelcss corrmunications faciliq' ^l 1'()44 ltoutc 28 in South Yamouth at anantcnna ccntcdinc hcight of 100.0 fect (AGQ wrlt provide aclcliUonal capacity ancl coverage needcd in thc targetcclcoverageareasinclr-rdingkcyrrraclwal,ssuclrasl,orrgPonclltoacl,statctlighway28,[:<lrcstRrladarrdthcstrrrourrdingroacls, 'cighbogrclocls and businesscs in the proxirnity.f the prop.seci sitc. In adcliti'n t<l provicling scrvicc to thcrargetecl arcas of South yam<luth, AT'&T is provicling enhancecl services 1.or first rcspondcrs thr<ltrgh thcimPlemcn.ation Of IiirstNct',s Narional PLrblic Safcty Broaclbanci Nehvotk ('NPSIIN')' \x/ithout thc installationof thc propr:secl site, AT&11 will bc unable to improve and cxpand thcir existing 4G I-'fl:l, wirclcss <xrmmutticati<>nscryices in this arca of Sourh \iam<:uth; thcr.f.rr., A'f&T respectfurlly requests that thc T'own of S.trth Yamoul:h act{'avt>rably uprtn thc proposccl fhcility'7" Statement of CertificationI ccrtify to the L)est of my l<nowlcclgc that the statcments in this report are true ancl 2ccLrlratclofi'*!U,'mnn'tSohail UsmaniC Scluared Systems, l,l .olulv 6. 2020ffiDatc6C Scluar:ed Systems, l,l.,Cfu\,6,2{)2{)
8. Attachments1C Scluar:ccl Systcms, l-,1,C.ltly 6,2\)20
MA1010 - Neighbor Sites & Radial Distances\Slte DetrSite: MAl010Lat 4l-39-32.06 NLon;70-12-15.18 WCL: 100 ftSvmbol Kevf E itriogsit"f nopmed siteTerrein Kev- Radial DisbnceQatat
MA1010 - Area Terrain MaPSite DataSite: MAt0l0Lat: 41-39-32-06 NLon: 70-12-15.t8 WCL: 100 frSvmbol Kevf rxisting Site* Prcposed SiteTerrain Kevloo l*nI ron ! sonI zoit El uoof ron I zonI atatvp.rt',4F.tLi;'trN\Fr.I.t "F'^'rf{,f.ni'4if#i-i?l;rln,t;f@L(ni$-:-.s'-i *:fi,;rp 'tYuAltam;wt:a)-vi))')DL...- !i-)te:rll --il!!.{iilhr$r -tl!i'-t.:'ai- 1!f"W-9jrltr .tsJ;-&wtn.'2\y:-r---_ j,- ^^- i - -.,\9c,
MA1010 - Existing 700 MHz LTE CoverageSite DataSite: MAl010Lai: 4l-39-32.06 NLon:70-12-15.18 WCL: 100 ftPlot Information700 MHz LTE RSRPSvmbol Kevf Existing Sitetk Pr€Dosed SiteCoverase Kevl:-sro"*l'-81-'9ldB.l-l Bebw ThresholdQatat>(l, i-\: i:'ii'iI1,1,.,14:ljfi.ft@t,IJ,;h$u'aIl?,{&'tF1IIt4:r,lt'{iJ,i|,r);:ldrl.,II@'lla.'{rlrt1!,-ti.t"I'dt',,t" \*!,1;l;)i*tt){#[L$#h+1,. i'r jir;liii.)rr,j:. :,i:*.l_,Y.inllii:i:.9r!lry'l.],t-:,t-il-) -1 ,
MA1010 - 700 MHz LTE Coverage with Proposed SiteSltc DataSite: MAl0l0Lat: 4l-39-32.06 NLon: 70-12-15.18 WCL: 100 ftPlot Information700 MHz LTE RSRPSvnbol KevI Existing Sitef PropmedSileCoverase Kcv| >-83dBm| < -tl - -lr oe*fl BetowThmholdpatat.-(\7,(tiil; i:4]t:rt.19f.@tttfi'(,$-$"t'*J{&'tFtt|'. ::ttlI+!IlIi' q il'l jq!)@iilj( 3Idt)_.('",:v'i'tF''i'.-5...(')\t'i:ffi,1;4ial.Id,!4\.iflil i+:lp..{f:Ir"$dt,Fnir1,'6r*\r+ia^ ,'*t#'."ttl!'.|i"\ qr'.. II-'it,.;t1ru"9ti.l,t 1'*.a"!.titti4ll;!"r{t;i.,,l-,J,t
MAL010- Existing 1900 MIIZ LTE CoverageSlte DataSite: MAl0l0tat: 4l-39-32.06 NLon:70-12-15.18 WCL: 100 ftPlot Information1900 MHz LTE RSRPSvmbolKev* Existingsitetk Prop6ed SiteCoverase Kev! >-86dBm!.-ro--xos.l-l Belorv Thrshold@xatxi,i;\.iztrilJ1,,,[.i;j, i!]*]4,11\rr''i,Itl"Jl';Lr,:iitat,1:i.t{[dtriiF
MA10f0 - 1900 MHz LTE Coverage with Proposed SiteSite DstaSite: MAl0l0Lat: 4l-39-12.06 NLon:70-12-15.18 lVCL: 100 ftPlot Information1900 MHz LTE RSRPSvmbol KevI ExistiagSite*' Propo*d SiteCoverage Kev| >-s6dBm| .-tot:-xdr-l--l BebwThr*holdpatat' rJ+4rl,yr.(iil{t_'I1,|,:\if.rIl.L)a,Lr]g,7J^ -: ' .(.i:.1:litilirtiJ,l:r,la_J\,'r;\rit{{i.1.t!',\lltlrkifr!3lltn':-r-"';:)'lr::)^r,''r\iii'l9
6"rstemsC Sclttarccl SYstcms, LLC65 Dartnlouth Drii'cAuburn, NI-l 03032Phone: (6fi3) 6442800strppr.rrt(4csqunrecls)'sten'rs'conlJuly 6,2021,Town of South Yarmouth, MACapc Cod Commission DRI Subcommittee3225Main Street,P.O.Box226Barnstablc, Massachusetts 02630Sun;ect: 1044Rours2STeLEcolvlMUNICATIoNSTowERMcmbers of thc Subcommincc:Regarcling some of thc technical RF (raclio frequency) chatacteristics of the proposed tower at 1044 Route 28in South yarmouth, AT&T is submitting thi, s,ippl"#ental letter ancl RF coverage maps to suPport its positionon that location's potential ability t<l satis8/ the network necds in the area'The proposed facility MAl010 provicles bettercoverage in SouthYarmo-uth than the aiternates presented by IsotroPe'It fills coverage gaps on maior roads, sttch as St^t lfrg-ry 28 Forest Roacl and ['ong P'nd R.ad' At 100 feet' theheight allows'ioi-,rt. coverage than the othcr alternate sites'Below table shows the loss in pops/ areaf roadcovera{4e stats at 90ft, 80ft & 70ft compared to the proposed 100ft'Incremental CovcmgeMHZ LTE-93Coverageat 1(nftCoveraSeat 90ft311'!Cover"geat 80ftCoverageat 70ft1916Loss ln Covetage(100ft-90ft)Loss ln Coverage(looft-8oft)Loss kr Goverage(1q!ft-71tft)BusinegsArea Covered(Z -93 dDm)2.7J1\1.16nJ21.25o.471r7.4%l0.94(34.8%)1.45(s3.7%lStfuctufes Count(2'93 dBm)35583iltu671152447112.6%l1091(30.7%)1806(s0.8%)Table 1: Coverage Comparison of Proposed Site at lffiftThe alternate site at 1045 Rt 2g is an edsting 70' flagpole with two tipper srots taken by rhe carrier. The next avxlableheight for rhe 2nl carrier is at 45' and35'which i, .rr"ry t,r- and will i*" to""'ugt gaps in areas where the proposedsite will provide reliable coverage along Route 28 andthe sutrounding areas' In particular, to the southwest alongroacls & neighborhood betweei Seavilw Avenue and Run Pond Road' AIso, to the northwest' it provides morecoverage to the suffouncling roads & neighbodrood north of \7inslow Gray Road'If AT&T was to go within a 90' pole, and assuming T-Mobile-woulcl.be the top carrier,-th:I T3y require two RADcenters down below. T-Mobile would be at g5' ani75'which leaves AT&T wth 65'and 55'. 55' is barely above theftee line. Furthcrmorc, flagpoles aren't "cquipment" frienclly' Thc way sites are clcsigned now' RRH's are installednear the antennas which allows the carricrs to use a fiber ancl a short coax design for fib-er' Flagpoles afen't conduciveto radios becanse there is no foorll for them to be installec{ near the antennas. T',herefore, the carriers need to rcvertback to the old scho.l coax design which means AT&T would likely need (30) 7 /8" coaialcables to be run insidethe pole. In addition, T-Mobile #,rUa Aro neecl a 1ot of coaxial cables running to the top of antennas inside the polewhich means the flagpole would likely neecl to be gteater than-48" in. diameter' Another limiting factof is the antennasize; it is impossible to 6t 3 ,".,or. onr.n.,as that ,iT&T uses for design in a standard diameter flagpolc'
6ttstemsC Squarecl SYstems, LLC65 Dartnrottth DrivcAuburn, NH 03032Phone: (603) 644 2800support(?cscluarccls]'stcm s'cou.tThe Chutch zyetnateis another suggestcd site and is not a viable option at 40.5'compared to the proposed MA1010site, It provides little benefit to th" rrital coverage gaps ak:ng Route igrnd Old Main Street and the surroundingroads'It provicles very linle .;*"g. to the roads ,tia """ighb"tf,oods north ancl northwest of the proposed MA1010 sitc'Church sites also provide less flexibility than toweisites or rooftops when it comes tcl changing azimuths becauseantennas cannot be pointed at the desired angle due to fixed c<irners of the church steeple leading t" Pt::ill:interference issues. Also, issues with space and r-udiu orr.rh"uting are eviclent, which necessitates the usage of I{VACunits to cool the steeple. on top r:f this, these FIVAC units and antcnnas add more issues with state historicpreservation of{ices (SHPOS), stru.toral integnty, ancl cost. Due to this, steeples are used as a last fesort by AT&T'The altcrnate at \xIX',fI( Tower does not provide any beneflt to the vital covefage gaps along Route 28 and{)ldMain Street ancl the surrounding roadr, ^, well as ih" roads and neighborhoods north.and northwest of thepr'p<;secl MA1010 site. This ult.irrnte site mainly benefits the cape to ihe southwest of the MA1010 proposedsite.Below is a comparison table of the proposed site at 100ft with the church and 1045- Rt2B polc'Incremental Coverage700 M}Iz LTEProposedTower at1(x)ft1045 Rt28at 70ftChurch at4lftloss ln Coverage(Proposed - 1045RdzSlLoss in Coverage(Proposed -ChurchlPopulation Covetage:(Z -93 dBm)3669r&38426t83L149.9o/ol3243188.4%lBusiness PoP Covql4ggi-(- -93 dBm)698577316L2t(!7.3Yol382(54.7%lAtea Covered (*i1, -P -93 dBm)2.7r.29a.29L.4t(52.2vo12.41(89.3%l(2 -93 dBm)42.8722.055.752a.82(48.6/ol37.L2(86.6oh1Structutes Count(2 -93 dBm)355817104591848(s1.s%)3O9e(87.1%lnerwork.Sincerely,Sohail UsmaniRF Engineer (Contractor to AT&T)Table2:CovetageComparisonofProposedSitewithAltematesSfe have conclucled that by utilizing the proposecl towef at 1044 Route 28 at an alnteflna center[ne height of100, AGI-, AT&T will be obl" ,o pridae significant coverage improvement to the residents, communiry areas'and traffic corridors within South Yarmouth that ur" .,r.r"nily loiated within deficient service areas of AT&T's
6"rstemsC Scprared SYstems' LLC65 Dartnxruth DriveAuburn, NH 03032Phone: (603) 64428(,0srrpport@csquarcclsystems'comSeptember 28,2021Cape Cod Commission DRI Subcommittee3225MainSueetP.O.Box226Barnstablc, Massachuset ts 02630Sunlncr: 10214 Rouru 28 TnIEcoNIMUNIcATIoNS TovrrnMernbers of the Subcommittcc:This letter is in response to the comments made by Mr, Davicl Maxson of Isotrope in the Rcview of Applicant'ssupplemental statement in Support of Application for Development of Regional Impact dated August3'2A21related to AT&T's prop*"a ii',it^llation t" tn" tower at 1044 Route 28 in South Yarmouth'Isotrope comment: we also find that combifling AT&T',s-covetageby adding the WXTI{ tower (at only 90teet) and from the profor".l site using only 80 fee"t height, the Route 28 corridor is satisfied'Response: WXTK Tow er is Z.2i miles South West of the proposed site and does not meet the design obiectiveof the proposed site at 1044 Route 28 in South Yor,,.,ootii (Site Name: M41010)' The coverage to AT&T'snetwclrk that would be added to the area by wxTI{ tower site woulcl not serve the current AT&T networkobjectives to address coverage gaps on St*L irign*ay Z1,.Forest.Road and Long Pond Road' AT&T hasdetermined that this area of5o,irf, yur-outh witiout'reliable service is a priority and the installation at' 1044Route 28 at the specified antenna cente4ine height of 95-feet-will improve iis.overall network performance' Aninstallation on the propor"d telecommunicatiJns tower at 1044 Rlute 28 is also essential for satis$ring thernandate of FirstNet to cfeate a nationwide, interoperable publ-ic safety broadband network for first responders'Through its deployme nt ^t 7044Route 28, AT&t wiil cr:ntrnue its efforts to provide prioritized, preemptivewireless services for first responders in Massachusetts'Isotrope comment: AT&T',s consultant, c-squarecl Systems, has not indicated why the selected 90-foot heighton the nfXTK tower is so low.Response: w-xTK towef site was used to clemonstrate the covefa ge at 125' and 150' in the attached coverageplots. The increase in the height does not $ange the fundame nt^l?uttthat the !6XTK tower is not a feasiblealternative to the installation of the AT&T "qiip*"rr, on the proposed telecommunications tower at 1044Route 2g. The instailation at either the 125' or'1 d0'height on the 'waxTK tower does not provide any.benefitto the targeted coverage gaps along State Highway 28, Firest Roacl, Long Pond Road and the sutrounding areanorth anJ nofthwest ,ir *-," prop"sed installati ofl at 1044 Route 28.Isottope commenr: A,r&T only shows the rwo highest signal level thresholds indicating the highest qualityof seruic., typically to penetrate local buildings'Response: The coverage shown is where the signal strength^s^ar.1 > -83 clBrn (minimum required fot reliable'high quality service ancl perform ^nce ^|ZOO ntl"tz; and, i -93. dBm (minimum requited for adequate level ofservice at700MHz). A'fa,f tlses these metrics tr', d"t"rroirr" levels for reliable servicc on its nerwork and tcliclentify areas with de ficient coverage and capacity. At these rwo.thresholds of reliable covefage' AT&T is ableto provicle customers with wirelessleruice that fulfiils its network obiectives'Isotrope Cornment: This informadon suggests that CAMs (or non-CAMs) at the 8O-foot height could bevaluable contributors to the coverage in this clensely develop ed atea along Rt 28' It is not necessafy to assume
6"rstemsAT&T ancl T-Mobile must occupy thc same B0-foot srrBcturc, especially if the lower positions on the pole ateobstructecl by vegetation t'^'" tut' close to nearb;'builcling lieights' The composite -map above demonstratesthat at most, an g6-foot str*ctsre is needed to fili in the gap nk-rng- the Rt 28 corridor, provided the WXTI(tower is also usecl. This confirms that Verizon's approach is iuund for AT&T and T-Mobile'Response: Because of equipment ancl operational requiremcnts,-cAlVlS are not feasible options for addressingAT&T,s network ,"q.rir"-"nts. AT&T nor onl)r uses rnultiple frequencies but also various technologies thatare i'compatible with the constraints inherent tt the installntio., ,rf ^nt.nnas and equipment inside of a CAMtower. This is clnly exacerbared by the complex wireless usage that increasingly consists.of data rather than voicescrvice. The demand for clata has grown exponentiall)' ovJr the years and ls constantly growing' Below graphancl excerpt from the',vhite paper fr-rrther demonstrate the claim;C Scluared SYstems, I-LC65 Darunouth l)tive^Auburn, NFI 03032Phone: (603) 6442800suppot:t(dlcsquaredsystcms. conr2018 20194s0o4,(XrO3,5003,o(Xt2r500z,{to0ts0o1,000500oproiected/Measured N. American Mobile Data Traffic 2010-19!cto=alB6t,B€al,4i96t 55235{tllr iei19220102(nr 20t2 tt13 m',4 2015 . m16 frr7- b loLl ffi Oilr trdlk - f,dtll tn""- fdcrcoa Toad lbt& O*r frift ' Lottlr Amk'-Fldrcddl Lt d sl ffi 6to|dl ntE-*6jr tl* DrE Trfiactotr& lot A}l]An' (O*o 3 Crlc"'nl.,The U.S. commercial wireless industry cannot meet this explosive gfowth simply through improvedenglneerlng,white-paper-new.PdlFew other reasons why GAMS are not an option can be futher explained belorv;Niultiple antenna center l-ines needecl by each carrier'Need to run bulky co-axial cables fr<,rm insicle the polc. Each a-nten:a has an average cif 12 ports' Carriers ma)'neecl to install 12 runs of coaxial cable for "n.h u.rt"rrrro. Multiply that by the total .n"ryT-o: inside the pole foreach carrier. \Xlith AT&T's (r antennas installecl at two diffeicnt heights inside the CANI they may need trrinstall a total of 72 rurns of coaxial cabies'Antenna size is much larger than it was a clecacle ago. Carriers are now installing antcnnas that are about 8 feetlong ancl 2 feet wicle. The antennas afe no\I/.npnfl" of supporting more hardware and handling more traffic'CAM cliameter wor-rld have to be wicle enough io o..u-roodate the antennas and the cable runs'
C Squared SYstems, LLC65 Dartmotrth f)rivcAubutn, NFI 03032Phone: (603) 6442800sufrport@csquaredsystenrs.comIf active componenrs are insrallecl in the CAM then a cooling mechanism would have to be put in piace toprevent over heating of the equipment.Further expansion or modification becomes impractical due to tight space to allow for additional hardware'Sfle have concludcd that by utilizing the proposecl to'u/er at 1044 Route 28 at the specified centedine height of95-feet as reflected in the attach"irudio frequency coverage plots for both 700 MHz and 1900 MHz LTEservice, AT&T' will be able to provide significant'cu,r"rogi irnprovement to South Yarmouth' While alsoaddressing a substantial gap in 4G LTE covefage for- Af&]'3 tt"twork, the proposed location has also beenselected by FirstNet u, ,,iirubl. for implementation of the National Public Safety Broadband Network'Sincerely6"tstemsf{+r'JUr o*Sohail UsmaniRF Engineer (Contractor to AT&T)
MA1010 - 700 MHz LTE Coverage with Proposed Site\Site DataSite: MAl0l0Lat: 4l-39-32.06 NLon: 70-12-15.18 WCL: 100 ftPlot Information700 MHz LTE &SRPSvmbol KevI ExistingSitetk Proposd SitcCoverase Kev| >-83dBm! . -sl t: -e: dn*I Bebw ThresholdE.alctv
MA1010 - 700 MHz LTE Coverage with Alt 1047 Rt 28Slte DataSite: MAl0l0Lat 4l-39-32.06 NLon:70-12-15.18 WCL: 100 ftPlot lnfornation700 MHz LTE RSR'PSvmbol Kevf existing Sitetk Prcposed Site*' Altemate SiteCovergge KevI --tro".l.-8lr=-9lae-[-l Below ThresholdVoon I/A12FS-.i.'r,lla\gt,\7, La\ijti'i9'..(:tll/,, ,:i4l'rrfiift@Ul?,{,t,;hsf1lr{r&..?I fr't'\r-t+-IIll,\ ,";i:\1l':Iil--? rr*, l.t t,.rt@r J,f\112{iB:-(:;1.r'7:1giln'.,vs -.,r,;Yi1.1fiii,!,1r,'l{"lttr.t'11'-I.i),i.14:;tI{rl,lAii'IiUffD.r|.\cLL' .r^1:.\"t"C\.{If,iilr$ds+.i.t-)i,<{Ift.-lvltrltiijar;{.11l.'i.l|k:{:tit;:ie-..r:i,/rnt
MA1010 - 700 MHz LTE Coverage wtth Alt WXTK TowerSite DataSite; MAl0l0Lat: 4l-39-32.06 NLon; 70-12-15.18 WCL: 100 ftPlot lnformation70O MHz LTE RSRPSvmbol Kevtk Existing Sitef Propo*d Site* Altemste SiteCoverase KevI r= -e, os*! .-gt=-936s*f] Below Threshold&*t,\ 'if,M1l,1.t''..' 411'1 ,<t' 1561-rYr#\f4!l1t,r/'j:{4,.l"afri1Ftr@9.'!,;hsrtli,t({FI 7tii'1,t1Ia'{Iir i,r^\l:tl'ir-( rdrl',';\dr-r*.II@? -,rd;l;.2fi:l'i ' 1u;f"ljtf.t.l!/1,*?4t: t6*fut'f,+t-#-+$'"llr,;;,i;)ji1;i11; ri'Itl-.':.ti,:i i^(iit.iiiri;d'lr,"i':i[i.,.',ri,i{,I,l,l.rl, i}]f iil'j'dio?lirF,;if.'i,. ,-,.)'t''f,t':l-r---_i:t.---. .: !:ji
8
Existing LTE (MidBand) Coverage - South Yarmouth, MA
Existing [-TE (l-cwBand] Ccverage * South Yanrncuth, [ViA
-11i
-107
-99
-99
0
Out{t@r
h-V€hicie
LtsBuilJ$q
h-Bdi5irg lqm
rF .')ftlbile '
2
LTE (MidBand) Coverage with Propose Site 4HY0604H at L15 Feet Rad Ctr.
South Yarmouth, MA
-100
-95
0
lLVel$cG
h€ua*t0
h-Ar-d.lrg Ce
:i:..\lolriil
LTf tLcivBaniiCcverage with Prcpose Site 4l-iY060r$r{ 3t i15 Feet Rad Cir
Scuth Yarr^ncLith, iUA
T..\lohilc
4
LTE ln-Building (MidBand) Coverage for Propose Site 4HY0604H - South Yarmouth, MA
Coverage Maps Simulated on Different Heights 115 Feet, 100 Feet and 80 Feet
LJ
= ---, "f'..'-:
a
J t 1l
-i It
lr
I
! o,i"tinec-"t"g"
I nrop*.Uco*"g"atu5 FeetRadCtr.
' ' Propos€d ctrerage at 1(F Fet Rad ctr.
Propoed Cd€r€€ at tt Fe€t Rad ctr.
:l:"\ftrlrrk'
LTE tn-Building (LowBand) Coverage for Propose Site 4HY0604H - South Yarmouth, MA
Coverage Maps Simulated on Different Heights L15 Feet, 100 Feet and B0 Feet
E:dstingCorcrage
Propc€d Ce€rageat 115 Feet Rad €b'
ffi nrcpcedcaverage:tllxtFetRadCF
! e."p*.ac-org"attoFet Rad cE.
:i: ' '\1,,lriii'
rnx.af.JgqTrnro€IcpOJ.-ao-(^,oo-lo)gqoIaoct+EFo)..t3oCt+Jk
Propose LTE (Low-Band) Coverage - 4HY0604H at 106 Feet
Existing LTE (Mid-Band) Coverage - South Yarmouth, MA
; L.f
Propose LTE (Mid-Band) Coverage - 4HY0604H at L06 Feet
!!,
Existing LTE (MidBand) Coverage - South Yarmouth, MA
CoF
-100
l5
-95
0
Ouldoor
h-v€t*le
h-Alllhg
Co&.r
propose LTE (MidBand) Coverage - 4HY0604H at 115 Feet
-100
.95
Oddoor
l!V€**l€
h-BlIIlg
propose LTE (MidBand) Coverage - Verizon Location at 45 Feet
C4bu
Propose 45 Feet available height for T-Mobile is too knr br its coverage
-11
Com
h-Vehtcle
b-3!tJhg
-108
-1 0c
35
0
!l:''\lttlrilt"objective
Propose LTE (MidBand) Coverage - Bass River Alternative Location (932-940 Rt 28,
Ya rm outh )
Cm
FVEhEIC
nEu*t0g
-108
-'100
-s5
0
l: "\hlriL"l
propose LTE (MidBand) Coverage *Town Parcel Alternative Location (290 W Yarmouth)
Cod
lFvehile
h€ufting
-100
.9S
0
:F ' '\ftrbiL'
Propose LTE (MidBand) Coverage - Town Parcel Alternative Location (99 Buck lsland)
15
08
00
Cod
-100
-95
Ouidoqr
h-Veh*ic
h-Eolrho
:l: . '\ftrbilt'
9
Photo simulations to be generated by Applicarrt" aftercrane test has been completed, which is to be scheduledwith the Town.
1
NOTAN3225 MAIN STREETo ne.Eod( a2A LBARNSTAB LE, MASSAC HOSOT?S 92630ek 3+937 Fg315 +9l*g9rr:t?-?.rs-2fi?:t ff LI_ E rl?{lLNOT..,'.t,ai,.r:r ..-.\' ., "{,;, /,.!' \J;iii !i1 i.: t:!it. ,i,f'.- \.!-.lil,ii-i#/ANOFFICIACOPYNTNOTCOPYCOPYDEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAT IMPACT DECISIONCAPE COD(s08) 362-3828 . Fax,Tt|t??"?{ ; *ilT'"o.codcommissio"'?'{, ^ "COMMISSIONDate:Project:Project ApPlicant:Property Owner:Property/ Site:Title Reference:January 13,2022'etue S[y Towers South Yarmouth Re-submission (File No. 21012)Blue Sky Towers lll, LLC d/b/a BSTMA lll, LLCc/o Ricardo Sousa, Esq., Prince Lobel Tye, LLPOne lnternational Place, Suite 3700, Boston, MA 02110Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall River1044 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MA 02664(Assessors MaP 50; Parcel 1 89.1)Book669, Page 144Blue Sky Towers Re.submission, South Yarmouth, MA - Commission File No. 21012Development of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2022 - Page 1SUMMARYThe cape cod commission ("Commission") hereby Srants Developrnent of Regional lmpact ('DRl'.)approval, with COnditions, for "BlUe Sky Towers Soutfr Varmouth Re-submittal"'to construct a 1 10-footwireless communications tower with associated improvements at 1044 Route 28 in SOuth Yarmouth'pursuanttoaVoteoftheCommissionatitsmeetingonJanuary13'2Q22'FINDINGSThe Cape Cod Commission hereby finds and determines os follows:F1. The Applicant proposes development on a leased po,rtion of a 4.4-acre +/- parcel' which currentlycontains a chapel church building and parking area ("Property" or "site"), by constructing a 110-foot multi-c"rri", *onopole-style wireless communications tower with associated equipment("Project"). The Applicant has legal standing to pursue the Project through a letter of authorizationfrornthe Property owner (Roman catholic Bishop of Fall River)'F2. The east side of the Properly abuts Route 28 and is occupied by other commercial properties' Th€west side of the property is predominantly occupied by single family residences, The Property is ina Freshwater Recharge Area (FWRAI but is not mapped for other sensitive resources identified in
F3.F4.F5F6.Bk 34927 P9316 #9989the Regional policy plan ('Rpp') such as priority habitat, natural landscapes, or undeveloped areassubjecttoflooding. N o T N o TAN ANGiven the surrogn$ing ,t.trfO {er4glopment poftFrrEi anddhE ggpqpf development beingproposed, ttre sYte'is g* rqprgr;ntuO ny the "subur@n@qpetgpment Area" Placetype. SuburbanDevelopment Areas ,ie llliracierized by moderately dense residentiaf neighborhoods as well asautomobile-oriented cgp6elcial development' N O fThe Applicant proposes fu J$vgtop and operatepn-thg Si$a,Si," an approximately 1 10-foot-tallwiretess corr,fti8ut'6nI t&uel vftttFotner sunp$rfin{af Hl+'d! Hnprovements, includinS:COPY. clearing 1/t-dcte +/- of wooded area;. constructing a 55'x65'stone compound surrounded by a 6'-tall stockade fencing;" installing the monopole tower, carrier antennas, concrete equipment pads, and allassociated ground equipment (including equipment cabinets, propane generators,propane ranks, ice nriOge protection, and high sound mitigation shields) within the fencedarea;o installing an approximately 12 x35' gravel driveway connecting the fenced area to theexisting parking lot;. installing vegetated storrnwater management swales along the perimeter of the fencedarea;n loaming and seeding the clisturbed areas outside of the fenced area; and. plantings to visually buffer the proposecl compound and associated ground-mountedequipment.Subr-rrban Development Area strategies include improving the clesign and function of commercialareas through landscaping and stormwater treatmenU and encouraging redevelopment ofexisting commercial suburban development with denser clusters of buildings surrounded by lessdeveloped areas. The Applicant proposes to develop a currently undeveloped portion of theProperty and to provide larrdscaping and stormwater management'Ongoing operarions and activity at the Properry woutd be minimal. Due to the minimal ongoingoperations, the Project does not involve regionally iignificant or sustained effects on thetransportation network.F6.1 The Federal Tetecommunications Act of 1996 at 47 'JSC 5332(c)(7XB)(i) provides that anyregulation of the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless servicefaciliries by any State or local government or instrumentality thereof shall not prohibit orhave the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services.F6.2 The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 at 47 USC S 332(c) (7)(BXiii) provides that anydecision by a State or local government or instrumentality thereof to deny a request toplace, construct or modify personal wireless service facilities shall be in writing andsupported by substantial evidence contained in a written record.Blue SkyTowers Re-submission, South Yarmotrth, MA - Commission File No. 2101 2Developrnent of Regional lmpact Decision - January 2022 - Page 2
Bk 34927 P9317 #9989BACKGROUNDt7. The project was previol!1rf$vieweo as a Developrn."r\?fig'onal lmpact (DRl) as File No' 2'1005,which was witrr$ra;rvrffin$of Ol.Ut prior to $e6tge 3f $eprftighearing process' This re-submittalis a continq6tignpf $at review process' C O P YF8, The Applicant made thfrfgloiflin8 modifications to its p(PryTl from DRI File No' 21005 in theapplication reviewed he6:, A No the tow€OhEigfit haCberCreduced by 1@frEnfln'6 t1B L. the breadth ofihg.Eri$ment frames has neerFr&,fi.Jfto* "12' to 6' on each of the threefaces of the frames;. spacing between the Antenna p4D Centers has been reduced by 4'5'from 15'to 10'-11';r th€ equipment pad area has been reduced from 70' x75' (5,250 sf) to 55'x 60'(3,300 s0;r tree clearing haS been reduced from 1 1,390 sf to 9,960 sf;r utility lines have been moved from overhead to underground;. fencing has been changed from chain-link to stockade; and. landscaping has been increased.F9. The Commission retained, at the Applicanfs expense, a consultant with expertise reviewingtechnical aspects of the proposal. The consultant, David Maxson of lsotrope wireless, LLC(,lsotrope,,), provided an initial report on the origlnal application for File No. 21005, followed bysupplemental comments on that filing. lsotrope submitted additional comments for this filing'which were reviewed as part of the proceedings'PROCEDURAL HISTORYF10. The project requires mandatory DRI review pursuant to Section 3 of the Commission's Chapter A:Enobling Regulations Governing Review of Developments of Regionol tmpact ('Enobling Regulations")(revised May 2020) as the "lc]onstruction of any Wlreless Communication Tower exceeding 35 feetin overall height...".F11, The Commission received a mandatory DRI referral for the Project from the Town of Yarmouth('Town") an 8/1212O21.F12. The hearing period was opened procedurally on 10/1 5/2021Fl3. The Appticant submitted a DRI application for the Project to the Commission on 1A125/2021'Fl4. The first substantive hearing was held by a DRI Subcommittee ("Subcommittee") on the Project on12114/202L The hearing wa! continu ed to 1t3t2022, where the Subcommittee reviewed a draftwritten DRI decision prJparea by staff at the Subcommittee's direction. At this hearing session, theSubcornmittee voted 4 in favor, 1 opposed to recommend to the full Commission that it grant DRIapproval for the project, with conditions, as set out in the draft written DRI decision reviewed bythe Subcommlttee,F1S. ThefullCape Cod Commission held a hearingon the Projectatits meetingonl/1312O22'!tconsidered the recommendation of the Subcommittee, including the draft written DRI declsion' AtBlue Sky Towers Re-submission, South Yarmouth, MA - Commission File No' 21012Development of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2022 - Page3
Bk 34927 P9318 #9989thehearing onl/13/2022,theCommissionvotedtoadoptthedraftwriftenDRldecision'andapprove the Project, wlth srdlconditions set out in saidl*eos& decision.DRIREVIEWSTANDAR^^ AN ANiYtutrcrAL oFFrcrALF16. Section 6(cXviii)"of ih *,VnUr*tR;iulotiont contains tl'tg SEldaKls to be met for DRI approval,which includ., ", "ppii."tle, consistency with the RPP, District of Critical Planning Concern(,DCpC") implementingNegulqtions, municipal developrger6t b5rlaws, and commission-ceftifiedLocal Comprenensive etppsli"f-Cpt. The Cornmission mupf a{po find that the probable benefit fromthe Project is grgatfrlr Stn t* prqpq$le detrimrort'r F I c I A LMUNTCTPAL DEVELoPMENTq\qAs/g LcP, AND DCPC CONf,SftrtcfF17. There are no DCPC implementing regulations applicable to the Project.Fl g. The Town of yarmouth's current Local Comprehensive Plan (LCP) was adopted in 2001 , lt statesthat telecommunications infrastrucrure would be dealt with via future planning efforts. The Townhas an undated inventory of potential sites for wireless communications towers, but none of theidentified sites are proximate to the coverage gap that has been identified'F1g.1 Beginning in 2020, the Town of Yarmouth has been engaged in a visioning Process anddevelopment of a draft Vision Plan, which sets forth updated planning goals for theTown, including improvements to the Route 28 corridor. The Vision Plan is expected toprovide a foundation for updating the Town's LCP, but this update has not yet beenimPlemented or adoPted.F19. The project will require a Special Permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals, Design Review, Siteplan Review, and any other non-land use town permits, such as permits for the propane tanks,from the Town of Yarmouth.F20. The project Site is within the Business District (82) and also in the Village Centers Overlay District(vcoD)Village center 3itvc3). This is an optionaloverlay district to incentivize redevelopment ofRoute 28 while requlring strict design standards. The Applicant has not elected to seek approvalpursuant to the V|OD zlning; accordingly those provisions of the Bylaw do not apply to theproject, Wireless communications towers may be allowed in any zoning district, but areencouraged on existing structures and sites designated by the Town. Section 408 of the Bylawestablishes detailed grlduline, including, but not limited to, the siting, design, and screening ofwireless comm unications towers.F21. LJnder Section 408 of the Bylaw, wireless communication towers may be permitted in the 82zoning district only under a Special Permit issued by the Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA')' The ZBAmay alter or waive one or more of the requirrements of Section 408 if it finds that the alteration orwaiver of rhe requirement(s) will not derogate from the intent of the Bylaw' Based on the currentdesign, required waivers may inclucle, but are not limited to, the requirement that the wirelesscommunication tower:. Be designed and sited to have the least visual effect on the environment (S 408'7'1);e Not be located within open areas that are discernable from public roads '.. or residentialdeveloPment (5 408.7.5.1 );Blue Sky Towers Re-submission, South Yarmouth, MA - Commission File No 2'101 2Development of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2022 - Page 4
Bk 34927 Ps319 #9989r Be no higher than 10 feet above the average height of trees or buildings within 300 feetof the proposes bcltrty or surrounding tree cal{o$r F 408'7'6'2); and. Providia#"q.",+.H brrftr gufficient *dftf.!."dp $"yiO; vfar-round screening (5408,7,m.$. I " -,".-t.c oPY coPYRPP CONSISTENCV REVIEWF22, The Commission revievlb&ti$ project relative to tne zdisQpF and companion Technical Bulletins,which were those in effe0t At the time the Comrnission c&n}fienced substantive hearing on theproject. Under g}.fi'otrg 6tSreh#, he commi*ifi #sdssEs flhdrrtiect's consistency with theRpp by determining,affie$r# tHe ProJect is consistent f,,itfr tHe [oals and objectives in the RPP thatare deemed applicible, material and regionally significant with respect to the Project. Thecompanion Technical Bulletins assist in elaborating and interpreting the RPP's goals andobjectives.F23, The Rpp goals and objectives specifically referenced in this section of the Decision and discussedin detail below are those determined to be applicable, material, and regionally significant withrespect to the Project and are thus subject to RPP consistency review'F24, Subject to the Conditions set out in this Decision, the Project is consistent with the RPP goals andobjectives and with the corresponding provisions from the Technical Bulletins, as discussed indetail below, and as such the Project is consistent with the RPP'Water ResourcesF25. The Water Resources Goalof the RPP is to maintain a sustainable supply of high-quality untreateddrinking water and protect, preserve, or restore the ecological integrity of Cape Cod's fresh andmarine surface water resources. Water Resources Objectives WR1, WRz, and WR4 are applicableand material to the Project:r Protect and preserve groundwater quality (WR1);r Protect, preserve, and restore freshwater resources (wR2); ando Manage and treat stormwater to protect and preserve water quality (wR4).F26. The primary source of nitrogen will be from stormwater runoff. Staff reviewed the proposedstormwater system and found it consistent with WR4, and thus the Project is consistent with WR1,FZ7. While the project is located within a Fresh Water Recharge Area, there is no septic systemproposed and the Project Site does not contain shoreline to a pond or lake.F28. Commission staff has reviewed the project plans and stormwater report, and the system isappropriately sized and designed consistent with Objective WR4.F29. The project is located in the Crowell Pond Freshwater Recharge Area. To meet WRz, the Project isrequired to prevent loading of nutrients and other contaminants to freshwater resources.F30. Nitrogen loading from the Project will be generated only by stormwater runoff from imperviousareas. The impervious areas proposed are the stone compound area, which would contain theground equipment and monopole, and the gravel.F31. Because no wastewater generation or fertilization is proposed or anticipated, the Project isexpected to be well below the 5 ppm sitewide nitrogen loading concentration limit.Blue Sky Towers Re-submission, South Yarmouth, MA - Commission File No, 21012Development of Regional lmpact Decision - January 2Q22 - Page 5
F32, The Applicant has proposed two (2) backup emergency generators and a transformer' Theproposed backup genelFtor fgel will be propane, posinglliultro no risk of groundwatercontamination, the tranffoNner will use biodegradable mrdrnon-toxic fluids'OFFICIAL OEFlCIALQ?ensldce c o p y c o P YF33. The Open Space Coal of inJnpp is to conserve, pieserve, or enhance a network of open spacethat contributes to the ilFgPqi6 natural and communitygeqgqces and systems' Open Spaceobjective oS3, which se$s1tp protecr or provide open snscftappropriate to context, is applicableandmaterialto5frq'Prpjqt,c t e t, o F F r c r A LF34. The Area of DevelopnftrQ tr8p&t for purposes of the fr@ir8dEpen space mitigation' excludingarea used for naturalized elements of the stormwater management systems' is 1 2'000 sf'F35. projects in suburban Development Areas are required to provide high-quality open space in aratio of 1:1 on-site, offsite, or by cash contributton'F36. The Applicant previously committed to a cash payment to the Town of Yarmouth to provide openspace and meet Objective OS3. A payment in lieu of the provision of restricted open space land isappropriate given the relatively small Area of Development lmpact for the Project and the Project'slocation in a highly developed area'F37, Based on the current Per-acre open space mitigation figure of $1 25'951 for the Town of Yarmouth'the.28-acreDevelopmentlmpactArearesultsinarequiredpaymentof$35'266'CommunitY oesignF38.The Community Design goal of the RPP is to protect and enhance the unique character of theregion,s built and natural environment based on the local context. community Design objectivescDl and CD3 are applicable and material to the and material to the Project:. Promote context-sensitive building and site design (cD1); andr Avoid adverse visual impacts from infrastructure to scenic resources (CD3)'F39. The proposed site abuts a mature wooded area on two sides and is set back from Route 28roughly 125 feet, behind an existing paved parking area. lt is set back from Forest Roadappioxinrately 165 feet and is sited behirrd an existing church and parking area'F40. The proposal has been modified to include significant improvements to landscaping' including theuse of a stockade fence'F41 . The Applicant provided photosimulations of the proposed monopole from vantage pointsiderrtified by the Commission. Even at the reduced height the tower will be highly visible alongsegments of Route 28 in South Yarmouth and at approaches to the intersectiorl of Route 28 andForest Road.F42. Theproposed tower will be visible in the distance from some locations in the south YarmouthNational Register Historic District, specifically areas on the west end of old Main Street wherethere are crossroads that provide views to the north'F43. The proposed towei will be visible in the distance from circuit Road near swan Pond but wouldhave a very small presence in the viewshecl because of its distance frorn that site'Bk 34927 Pq32O #9989BlueSkyTowersRe-submission,southYarmouth,MA-CommlssionFileNo.21012Development of Regional lmpact Decision - January 2O22 - Page 6
F44. The tower will be highly visible from adjacent locations with large pub.lic parking areas and tomotorists using nouie is witmn roughly 1/e-mllefrom tl"iH sQe'lHowever' the revised proposalincludes several changesftol{he design and site that reduAe tfie visibillty and overall silhouette ofthe tower. The &rtffrrErsIrr€orl shalhr frames &aFnbubt Sreln clo$er to the tower, resulting in ashorterandnarrowerQrofilP,Y c O P Y"'H['^:i:.?i?:ff lilsrffi ,f#;:: j"#iffj;:1"Jtrffi rfi:;lsx] jl:ili;ii'ffi :il:than if eacrr carrier*ruS"?" ffspirpittipte CAM6algntt& ttirS. fr8gorridor, similar to the oneinstalled by VeriZofi a8o8; F$e28Trom this Site' c o p yF46. The project is unlikely to have any significant visual presence in the historic district due to itsdistance from the district and due to the density of buildlngs and mature vegetation that obscuremost views to it. Further, the surrounding lOcations are not designated scenic roads or scenicvistas, and there are many other man-mid" f..trret in the viewshed that would obscure ordistract from the ProPosed tower,Capitdl Facilities & lnfrastructureF47. The Capiral Facilities & lnfrastructure Goal of the RPP is to guide the development of capitalfacilities and infrastructure necessary to meet the region's needs while protecting regionalresources, Capital Facilities & lnfrastructure objective CAP2, which seeks to coordinate the sitingof capital facilities and infrastructure to enhance the efficient provision of services and facilitiesthat iespond to the needs of the region, is applicable and material to the ProjectF4g. Based on the materials provided by the Applican[ the Project is infrastructure that would improvecellular service in the area of the proposed site, in response to the needs of the region'F4g. wireless network connectivity is influenced by many factors, including proximity to a cell site,physical obstacles and signal interference. Wireless service can be affected by severe Weather'topographicalfeatures, or large structures or other objects between a phone and the nearest cellsite,F50. The Applicant suggests that T-Mobile and AT&T have identified a significant gap in wirelesscoverage in thls Jiea of yarmouth. The Applicant identified the proposed site as the only feasiblelocation to close T-Mobile's and AT&Ts significant gap'F51 . The Project would improve cellular coverage in Yarmouth for T-Mobile and AT&T, and includesspace for two additional carriers.F52, The commission retained a wireless consultant to review the claimed coverage gaps as requiredunder Technical Bulletin 97-001.consistency with Techntcot Builetin 97-001: Guidetines for DRI Revlew of wlreless communicationTowers (Revised SePtember 2010)F53. The CommissiOn retained a wlreless consultant, David Maxson of lsotrope wirbless, LLC(,,lsotrope,) to assist the Commission in the review of technical data, including the coverageanalysis provided by the carriers, T-Mobile and AT&T'Bk 34927 Pg32L #99e9BlueSkyTowersRe-submission,SouthYarmouth,MA-CommissionFileNo.210lzDevelopment of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2OZZ - PageT
Bk 34927 Pg322 #9989F54, lsotrope reviewed the data and found that a significant gap in coverage does exist for T-Mobileand AT&T, Dish has alsN eopressed interest in location Dh €hqtower as it seeks to build out its newwirelessnetwork. A N A NF55. rn consuttation ftitfl c$n{*Gri-6-nttJr, rsotrope ?dStifi"{nfite-lti8l Jfternate locations awav fromthe Route ,a ,"r;ii"r9rpl li.."Voppu.uni ptou,o"o rur$o'?t"E oX ff'otu locations. lt is likely that theiclentified locations wouldrr$her be available nor Rreflr%tifiltl tne nrooo]l1t't*F56. lsotrope's review OetertrArifthat the proposed gap cou$ Sp fillecl with multiple concealedanrenna monoplg (FAlli) glogg6hgnoute 28 cgrrids, qro6dingPFirXilar effectiveness in closingthe coverage gri ti tOe $nge.fnonopole ptopoi"O, lqgtrgpp ftgted that because CAMs may belimited to one or two carriers, more CAMs may be required in an area to provide the same level ofservice as a tower.F57. The Commission does not review CAMs of less than 80'in height. This inherent preference withinthe Commission regulations was weighed against the impacts of alternatives to the Project inrelation to regionally significant resources, However, the use of CAMs may be preferential inrelation to local t.arorr.ar when the proposal is reviewed at the Town level'F57.1 The project does not require any waivers under the Wireless Technical BulletinRe gi o na I Be n ef its/ D etr i m e ntsF58, Probable benefits of the Project identified include:. The project will address identified wireless coverage and capacity problems along thenoute 2'g corridor, provicling needed service to a variety of users including area residents,the traveling public, and visitors who rely on st.tch services for emergencycommunications, to operate their businesses, and to communicate with friends arrdfamily either at home or in their vehicles. wireless communications are used by many. homeowners who have eliminated land lines and use of multiple wireless platformscreateshighdatademandthatWillbeservedbytheProject.r The project provides opportunities for other national wireless carriers to site-share onthe profiosed WCT, potentially eliminating or limiting the future need for additiotralwireless towers in the area'F5g.ProbabledetrimentsoftheProjectidentifiedinclude:r The Project may have visual impacts along the Route 28 corridor, with more acuteimpacts to properties in immediate proximity to the Site'. Tlre project rnay not be consistent with local visioning and planning efforts currentlyunderwly to improve the visual character of the Route 28 corridor.CONCLUSIONBased on the Findings above and subject to the Conditions set out below, the Commission furtherdetermines, flnds, and concludes that the Project is consistent with the 2018 Cape cod Regional Policyplan, applicable provisions from the Yarmoutn lcp, anct applicable municipal development bylaws; theprobable benefit of the Project is Sreater than the probable detriment; there is not substantial evidencein the recorcl to warrant a denial under the standarcls of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996;Blue Sky Towers Re-submission, south Yarmouth, MA - Commission File No. 21012Developrnent of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2022 -PageB
Bk 34927 P9323 #9989and the Commission hereby grants DRI approval for tlre Blue Sky Towers South Yarmouth Re'submissionProjectdescribedherein. N o T N o TCONDITIONS AN ANOFTICIAL OFFICIALCl. This Decision ut',ult netOatpvhen the appeal period s€t @tin SPction 17 of the Cape CodCommission Act has "f uptuO without appeal'(or if such an appeal has been filed' when the appealhas been finally settle$ dFrUissed, adjudicated, or othHrWjsqdisposed of in favor of theApplicant). Theieafter, thisloecision shall be valid and iruefftci and local development permitsmay be issued €uEsrE nth(se@ hr B period of oewnyearsdrorn Ahcdate of this Decision' or forsuch extendeO peiiodaonpnbe permitted by the Cqnroispiou pursuant to the EnablingRegulations'c2. A copy of the Decision, when final and prior to commencement of the Project, shall be recordedwith the Barnstable Registry of Deeds'C3. This Decision shall be appurtenant to and run with the Property, The Decision shall bind and beenforceable against, and'inure to the benefit ol the Applicant, its heirs, successors. and assigns'C4. The Applicant shall obtain all required federal, state, and local permits, licenses' and approvalsfor the Project, including without limitation Site Plan approval, a Special Permit' and anynecessary waivers under the Yarmouth Zoning Bylaw. Consistency with Municipal DevelopmentBylaws shall be ratified and confirmed by the npplicant obtaining all said required local permits,ticenses, and approvals for the Project, Prior to commencement of the Project, the Applicant shallprovide the Commission with copies of all required local permits, licenses, and approvals for thebroject. Any changes ro the project resulting from the municipal review process may requiremodification of this Decision.c5. The project shall be constructed, operated, and maintained consistent with the foltowingdocuments (,,Approved Project Plans"). Plans, protocols, and other documents received orrequired to be submitted as Conditions of this Decision shall be treated as incorporated into theApproved project plans once received, reviewed, and approved for consistency with this Decisionby commission stafl and the Project shall thereafter be constructed, operated, and maintainedconsistent with the Approved Project Plans, as so supplemented:r plan set entitled "Site Name: South Yarmouth, Site Number: MA-s104 Address: 1044Route 2g, south yarmouth, MA A2664" consisting Of 11 sheets, prepared byJesse Moreno'ProterraDesignGroup,LLC,finalrevisiondatedl0/251202,|c6. The Applicant shail provide a copy of thls Decision and the Approved Project Plans to the Projecfsgeneral contractor prior to commencement of the Project. The Applicant shall maintain a copy ofthis Decision and the Approved Project Plans on the Project Site throughout Project construction'C7. prior to and as a Condition to issuance of a building permiVs for the Project from the Town ofyarmouth, the Applicant shall request and obtain from the Commission a Preliminary Certificateof Compliance; tire issuance of such Preliminary Certificate of Compliance evidences that theApplicant has satisfied all Conditions in this Decisiorr required to have been satisfied prlor to theissuance of a local building permit/s'cg. prior to and as a condition to issuance of a certificate/s of use and occupancy or building permitsign-off/s for the project from the Town of Yarmouth Building Department, the Applicant shallBlue sky Towers Re-submission, south Yarmouth, MA - commission File No' 21012Development of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2022 -Page 9
Bk 34927 Pg324 #9989request and obtain from the Commission a Final Certificate of Compliance; the issuance of suchFinal certificate of corNpfrdte evidences that the AppliLdt Eas satisfied all conditions in thisDecision requirecl to f'ub" Neen satisfied prior to the lssAarite of a local Certificateis of Use andoccupancy or oriElirft FeretitE 9Enloff/s, and ghaFcdhf&ncthbt fhdProject was constructed orlmplemenied in accdd&r& l^Yth this Decision' c o P YC9. The APPlicant herebYtimes and uPonimplementedCertificate ofC10. Prior to and as a conditionthe Applicant shall make asupport acquisition and conservation of open space'C1 1. All proposed backup generators shall be propane fueled'c12. Transformer fluids used onsite shall be biodegradable and non-toxic.in accordc8'$rifoSIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWSBlue sky Towers Re-submission, south Yarmouth, MA - commission File No' 2101 2Development of Regional lmpact Decision - Jahuary 2O22 - Page 10
Bk 34927 P9325 #9989*oo*t 'IGNATURE PAGENOEFICIAL OFFICIALExecuted tHis ldb aav rF ffi^h?.zozz c o P YFor the Cape Cod ComrnissiorlpYg I N o TOTANANAOFFIPcoSignatured A;I"l*ul'Print Name and TitleCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTSBarnstable, ss2022Before me, the undersignecl notary public, personally appin his/her capacity u, }n,f,ypn -- and on behalf of the Cape Cod Commission' whosename is signed on the preceding or attached document, and such person acknowledged to me thathe/she signed such document voluntarily for its stated purpose. The identity of such person was provedto me through satisfactory evidence of iderrtification, which was [ ] photographic identification withsignature issued by a federal or state governmental agency, [ ] oath or affirmation of a credible witness'or [X] personal knowledge of the undersignedCIALNCIALPYSEPublicMy Commission ExPires:t/asldb---r---r--BAN!{STA[[E NEGFMY OT DETDEtohn F Meade, RegisterBlue 5ky Towers Re-submission, South Yarmouth, MA - Commission File No' 21012Development of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2022 - Page 11ust P. 0tlt0[ffiIntrHnuc0dr'lffilidhrsUyGomnhlknfugtlarsFr?8. r0{0
11
Rovlew le:n Concoptuel E FormalcI Btndtng (404 MoteleMCoD/R.O.A.D. Project) El Non-binding (All olher commercial proJecte)Revlew ls bv: tr Plannlog Board E Dpghn Revlcw CommitteepEsrofl ngvtEw confrlEuT gHEEr89.11044TownYarmouthat:128,on a motlon hy charlte Adamt seconded hy chrtswncent, the Deslgn Revlew commtuee (t'Rc) voted (&6;;';it;;r-iht Jun. 14, 2022 DRC medtns at 5:a3 PM'Ptolect Summaw1tr#rii-iu#m*fi1iq'iR.AD and vcoD VC3. The Apprcant is proposing il JJniitiilt'" tio' tatimonopore coirmunrcarion Tovrrer foruo to four carriers with .rccessory ground equpm#i E"plr"rg1tt"t manrLis navi been provlded fom the 4/s122DRC meerins showing ;;;#d;Jrel ioivir cJliig.tiili,iiurate a crocrt&Er, and a iTore derailed anemativesiting analYsis.ffi #ill;J*:i,ffi i#',"ii!ffi !$riilld0ff '#itx*Stffi '$l:fi !rncruded supptementar ,iJtii"i., iil, "-iiio_"ciimuatel ctocR tower iJ htue ttre antennas, and can includecrocks on ail thrse srdes. He noted the photoainiuiJiions ai tourtocauonr "no w"r rooking for feedback fom theonb. He also noted the revlsed project planc'DRC Oues{ons & Dlgcumlons:chrrs Vrncenilikes the 3-regged concept and wourd rike to see three crocks on it. Attomey $ousa also noted thiecould be a focal Polnt ln Town.Charlie Adams asked lf the clocks were operatlonal, and Attorney Souea eaid they would be'steve o,Neir asked rf antennas wourd be rocatqd behind the crock paners and the materiar for the side panels'Attorney sousa rndicate;ffi ;;d;;;s wJuio ue rlc"tiJ oeLrnd, usini. a raoio iruqu"ncv (RF) transparent material'sean Gormrey indrcated the paner material*"i-i6iiir"rs anb lrrg-reos ire mide oirt of steer. The otock is aspectalctook made to arrowhiiirequency ro g";dil'itirdl: 1d q !;1t asled iuout backlishtino or llluminationof the crock to be seen at nrght, sean Gormreyinomted'r'e is not, sure-,i i;; ;iik ;il ui oacltit. Mr' o'Neilapprectated trytng to wor[ on lfre aestgn to ""toiiR"'J"-th;;6;d gyl$ noi convlnced this ls the best locationand was ress impressed wrth the aftcrnative *liiJrl.' i" teit tnei toortre paitr of reast resistance, and couldG,damsat:
reach out to the Town on Town'owned pr9R9{V1 especially along Buck-lsland Road' He noted tho procass forlli,?:::1,'.:i#:t#fi,8t*,,,lxlffaffin:::ln:t?l.i;l:!i:'*Ti*;il:ul'$,iilxn;,i'i,l:flTil''"T'?::that mrsht be vrabre, eepeciary the Davenport pd"Jiffiffi;; il;iib Loil.'n" *ourdrke to oee more effort atboiing-at other altos beeides this one'charlre Adams does not feel enough has been done on tndrng another rocatron. As far as the deeign is concemed,wourd be rn favor or moie Ja co'ro64 rt,,re simi;ii; ii^" Et tre exampiei'ltiiirt"Jiriodte left) as the DRcsi,lird"rrttl"JrJ for cape cod style archltecturc'soha, usmanr showed the prot coverage laps.Ior the aroa incruding gg Buck rsrand Road whtch drd not cover thearea needed. ne noteJltrly also bo[ed at otner ;iies ana coverage t"pt tnU fi"ight scenarios as part of theCape Cod Commlsslon Procese'chrls Vlncent tndicated he was okay with the looation due to the corerage neede'charrie Adams asked about the tower rocated across the street at the post offrce, Attomey soqslr noted that thespacins inside thc tnr"dilliiJ-cnr,n t"oii.""rli;^6;;ftni'p"rif ""n:i'tJnttin todem'5G antennas andorovide a, needed ,"r"*""]'nrJo, Verrion r, "t inlioil"iio iit'" rofr.t i#i;;",id ;ot serve the needs of AT&Tbnd T-Mobile anO woutOiit-atOw f6r SC coverage, so ttrey chose a dlfferent design'Attornev sousa noted that tha Davenports.received a certifledlrtlail and spokc in opposition to the cape codcommiision onr. xatrvfrrii;;"-h;'ti;rid"d ii;;i#i;;t l"rorryug.i dtthe o"u'ihportq fgr the appllcant to;i:'ifr ;::t"'n*ff #i,lil:i,*if,illfi1r;:hi*{f i:i#1"i#;;lffi {:,g'H'g";fiorocess and ha sone d;;fi ttt" Cip" Cod commission wllh a favorablhrougn the alternative sites that were revlewes'Drck Martin noted that he understande the need ror coverage in the area. and doesn't thrnk thrs is a bad eite' butwourd *kE to 86e as mucn uutrer as poseibre "" itl, .itl-iJ'"urr"ntrv n"*rri'*""0",i. -HJ atso felt 110' ls tall andnot rhrlned w*h rhe oestsn and wanied s-oryl*;T;i'.i."** lq: lii; ; ;;k6t*r rather than a larse sign'*rilril:,it,f,,';i:1"ffi flsJ',ifr hl"fiki"ThT'iTtr$ilitiii$'fr t$J#*#FJlw#*:i;ffi''h*" sr,ioins *-iru;ili;fv 9G9-tl-i"!r"8:lrlfff',rt:,'ii? rrlightwqs reouce{jg-'d' "iieaav, anofl} n:,,:l*li*?f,,Hlff"lffilii1,01ffi''n"*1. ;;;lJii;'th; ffi;;6-be more attractive ir need thislocaiion and helght.soha, usmani noted that the three-sided dgsrqn ie neoded as the antennae transmit rn three dlrections' so thisrits we, wrth a 3-regged versus 4-regged *trurt ir". "iil?rr*t r"g arso rmp"cie iransmrssione, Kathv wlliamsshared her versron of the Jesign ereirlnts *t irr.,'ii."riJ upine'to{"." t" iili"lil"* sign ,ke (see atached) andsuggested orienrng rhe ;;;iil; t" oe seen troiliiri" Ie tliu"ring.wEs'ta;;'J"ir"-rrnor*6 said the 3'lessedf'.T'fl pmTi[:ltTd#iid11ff $;ffi#:l:,,";jHit"xH['iJifi ffi1lb:?,turnngtmavmpaotMr. Marirn rnquired about the randscaping pran and askad about the circres on the pran facing Route 28' Jegeeiinotiino not",j those are proposed bushes'srTlNG STEATEGESSect, 1. Streetgcape E N/A n Meets standards' or E Dlsorepancles:There are no new hurdrngs proposed whrch courd be rocated adJacent to the roadway to deline ths streetscape'
Sect. 2. Tenant Soaceq I Xn tr Meets Standards' or E Diecrepanclee:sect.3.DcllncstreetEdgeElvntrMeetsStandardg,orBDisoepancles:Sect.4,$hleldLaroeBuildinoeEN/AtrMeetsstandards,orEDlecrepanclos:Sect, 5. Deglgn-a 2nd Storv E N/A tr Meels Standarde' or E Discrepancles:B t'tlR g Meets Standarde' or El Dlacrepancles:Sect, 7. Landecaoe Buffere/Screenlng g N/A El Mogts standEfde, or El Dlscrepanciee:ftlstmpoulbletotandgcape|butfe.rall0.,tower.lfthtstocatton'sdetormtnedtobetheonlyvlableop*on, confnue to ,ii;fiiiiia reaecun'iiJ"ii]dlo;ii uicea oi in" comments trom the DRCmeattng,The ground Qqutpment and lranslonnsr should be futly jcreened wtth plants large enough to ecreenthe tattest agutryant Et Inttlrt ptanUng. Xyii}iini ifis1ng trgal itoig the nolth'and west sldee ofthe tower chouu oe aiiiiJlo'ii ,i^-or"a "J inii'i" niiifr* ii n ptaie ac theg' trees pravtda sometandsc aPe buflerh gkc toen I ng'Poolace anv dead etrcsttrees and lnstlt n6w trees every 20' (where posslble) atong Route 2E and Foresf Road'ifr in-ri*-ritne*vleterlgeandbuff erthepropeily'Fenctng arcund tlln equlpment area should be cedar'Sect.8'ParkinoLotVieibllityBN/AtrMeetsstandards,ortrDlecrepancles:Sect. 9' Break uo Laoe Parkino Lots e N/A n Meotc $landards, ortJ Diecrepanclee:Sect'l0.LocetgUtilltl€sUndgroround,ElN/AtsMcetsSt$dards,orBDigcngpancfus;$ect.11'ShleldLoadinoArgasmN/AtrMoetsStandErds.or[lDiscrepanclee:#tr:ir##fi:iti{:r:$ect. 1. Break Doygn Building Mass - Multiole Bldos, E wR n Meot* $landardr' or t3 Dlsorepandee:gect. 2. Break Down BUilding Maes - sub-Nlasse! B N/A 0 Meets standards' or fl Dircropanoles:Sect. 3, Vary Faoade Line.g tr ntR n Meots Slandards' or o Dlscrepancies:[ect. 4;Varv Wall Heiohts E rutn n Meote Standarde' or D Dlecrepanclee:Sect. 5. Varv Roof Llnes tr t$tn g Meets Standards' or E Discrepanciea:SecJ.6.BrinqDownBuildingEdoesEt{/AuMegts$landards,orEDiscrepanciee:Sect. 7. Vary Buildlng Mat'ls For Deoth E NIA o Meels Standards, or tr Discrepancies;Etr NIA U Meots Slandards' or E Dlscrepancies:,sect. L lncorporate Pedestrian-ccaled Feqtures EN N/A tr Meots $tandards' or E Dlscrepancles:Sect.lg.lncoroorateEngllfy-efflcientDesiqnElN/AtrMeetsStandards'orEDiscrepancles:
NoxtgtGpfortpphcenl@GotoSttePlanFtevtewIlR€|umtoDcsignRevtewforFormalRevtewon a mollon by chrts wnccnl, seoonded by.chartte Adams, rhr- Dealgn Rgvlcw commlflee (DRc) votcrl (3'0) toeppr,ov. these DRC ciiil,iiJ-ii .;",ittrg.;ir;;;"i;; n,i 1uh9 .ii"-ibii i"etini ror'the proposedeommunlcailon, towet and ground equlp^rnt ri"i-ii nourc zc, soullr Yarmoullt'Recetved bY--l\ /d-"e#/.4J| (rnf,zATTACHInEfTIT$ to June 11,2o22Meetlng (also referio Aprll 5, 20t2 meallng melorlrlr|Juno 14, 2022 Agondt416122 ORC Commrnt Shogtiiimprer of cdl Tower Clocls from Amerlclockil;ffi;;f"tio""i - Yarrnouth Plannlng DlvlrlonaaIatDRCoooooAoollcrtlon:tr{"'id.'iriizlcttorlrornAttorncyRlcrdosoumptr6to Slmutr*on ot ctol[i;ffi iouiiocrrronc ol exirtlng rnd propoeedlulrru.t*n;t#l"J:l;l$rilfi, prorcrn rrosrsn croup, LLc, dcrod Aet . zo, ?022- r 3P - Overrll Slts Han. P8-l - Prrtlrl glte Plrn. F$.2 - Prrtlrl 9ltc Flensn ;"iTt;f*l;|:Sr:f& prorc'r ou'br croup, LLC, drtod st12tzzunl*r otherwleenotod:Ex]*tlng Condllorc, drrlod W lNA-l: Aerlrl I USOS flltpA.2r ComFllcd Plot PlanA-t: Ovcnll Slte Plrnn+i ComPound Plrn & ElcvatlcnA-6: Phntlng PlrnSE-ll Sltlng ElovatlontD-l: Octeilcci-l ir CAa: co"APPllcant odrllrEl'-'i:-Et*ron conti6l Phn & oetalleT-l: Tltlc $hcetc-lr Abuttcc Plen &
Cell Tower Clocks Photo Galleryl\,\.*-elocks/lery/cell-towercom/gahttps://americlock.
d\a *iioP uts '5 'j FS aairlv t:fiP,rtIC.4 CA-: rr;lcF cdffc :c.l:u:rrlr4!:oitrrLs Iitr i-scha lf!-li :e'i*rr ar-ro :rr ti,' 'trNsn4lr JHeDUcL: rtupva\i t€ts,N Rt'{5Y ii^ilgretilr $aaorLiteH^lt iF) tr 1^L: ^{r!rN^iti-' :.D*i'- -{-a a\-T::.*€i<-4,;t€?fCONCEPTS - CLOCK TOWER CONSIDERAfi ON 5ILU72 -Yarnouih Planning Divisioni vn iegnn+ rcodt ttr^r[lilAtr /ii 9 I^U SIE$N^5IIz\nE-9I:E!-:E*Ie33dIE9-Ir{ : )rilll :acE I'.I'I1liI:_'3IiiIiI?iiIiIi iari{ \'P\ Ai&r il, & rrutt!t;Es. {-} t€:. !r€rr:r lt) 'xai?uucr rus!f,-irr rot{F r.ta(P) torr rac .? s 4.9r': rcT:,- {oaB,t: q Lt4 iO: l:c{Pr {qio?GL c6g€ra -fa!i):-.r +*t\c.ISLisd XJ;aNAL t2\trlxav^lrN ! Fi!?49^B fF&:Srts 6^x & StuClsALa:idtr! uli& val g s.:c@^u *ra 6oE:hsLi€cryi$AB5 iBY 0hl6)ELEVATIONrowER)+*=#=-;
SITE PLAN REVIEW COfi,IMENT SHEETFormal ReviewParcel: 189.150Date: J192022Lt.rs lllSouthB-2Proiect $unlmarvProposedwirelesstelecommunicationfacilitymonopoleCommunicationTowerandgroundequipment'CommentsZ /l@)^rrrorno: property is located in the 82 zoning district Proposal for a 110'cell tower will require relief from severalffi::':,""t"?,:il:"P'{1il" ,orn of yarmouth by speciar permit per section 408 4 of the Zonins Bvlaw from the ZoninsBoard of APPeals.section 4og.4.1states that the ZBA may alter or waive one or more requirements of section 408 if it finds that thearteration or waiver of the requirements witt'ioiu"rig"t* ir*,tne inte"n-i oi ftr" uvr"* Applicant requested severalwaivers from certain sections of the zonins fiiyllGl{tpri"Ji"r i"'spR.1h; purpoi;6 of spR is to identifv plans that;"n:li:lr1$:1,:J,ii;l#i1;3ffi*ifiiJ:;,J#,;ff?13ffi[ig:" sharr be requested directrv rrom the ZBA rromrheforowing sections. The proced.ure for this i, noi .r"ui, no*"06r, i*orii "r**e it tak"s prace in person at the hea.ng's*"tion?og'o.3 #1,#1c - Scaled plans and tree cover'Section408,6,2#5regardinglocationsofotherpersonalwirelessfacilities.s;;iil 40s.6'3#2A- sight line representation's;;ifi 408,6.3 #2D - Visual impact photographs's;;iil 408'6.3 #38 - security barrier cutaway view'Section 408.6,3 *3O Exiiting and proposed tree / planting heights'S""ii"^ 408.6.3 #3E - Grade changes and contours'Confirm with ZBA that the criteria ror aoe.d.i";iiliioon test) has been met or schedule with ZBA'R.,flmfi*;:;i; HffJl?':fill"nTilt3i)i"3f."*' : y ?:ylunication racitities shatt be desisned and sired so asto have the least adverse visuat effect on iii'iiiion;;nt. onu s;;;:;;;;iiii'o ii*note tvpe towers are permissibte'Lattice towers, ort the use af ground anchors and/or guy wires are prohibited'ln accordance wifr section 4og.7.3appri."ni i"* nriJrin ot prouing iiufto[cation on another structure is not feasible'ivi;];;" gooo taiih eif;rt to co-locite per 408'7'3 1#'s 1'2'3'Section 40g.7.g.Z- Applicant must providJ'*iiti"n tt"i.t"ni tnut co-location is not feasible to the ZBA'ffl,[t, r:::f ;il,ytr#i#il*;l*::i'tm[?'d$ff'1"J'3:lJf*.ted pwsF sha,, nor project higher than tenfeet above or tree canoPY'section 40g.7 ,g rail zones. communication towers, whother free standing or part of another structure or buirding, must beset back from ail property tines ay at teast tnJ iiai'irigit ot nr,toii'iii,i\w[tir" and its apnurtenances' lt is not clear atthis time if far zonescan incrude parking J;;;;ffpilo ruiruing]'"-r ti'!"rri'r" propertv icould not locate a lightingBf'?,ff 8X?J::ill""iiffi3i'f'T"k ft Pl?l:I,l"lP 'l:*":':::'$i:^in[:IiJtrJlt;1llii: fi:il:iffJ,Y,i.'"'section 408.10. Section 408.1 1 requrres-inipedtion ny owners "*p"ril".g,"il""ri "u"w 2 years and that documentation to6e suppfieC to the Building Department for the file'
I Communiw Development and Plannino;,Ar pbnning Efforts & Zoning: Throughout the cape cod c_ommission Deveropment of .Regional lmpact (DRl) process'. comment retters were submitted by the io*"-Fi"*r, ptanning-Boria unb Town Adnilnistrator expressing seriousconcerns about the height, location uno aesttretics of this cell tor"i'i,iIliiniv uiriol. ro"ation within our main commercialcorridor. yarmourh is itriving to bette.tr;il;iil iuJ.u"iop*"nt o?'o]ri"flo,lte i8 corridor beins front and center in ourpranning efforts. Through zoning, qrow!! ,l""iiu, zones, bpportr'"itv r"r'-r, rirLn piunnrng, riastewater initiatives andMassDor streetscape improvementr, *" "r. concentrating ,""or#i rnJ rbn"v to'improve this corridor and create anenvironment that fosters investment. rnl, ?o*ui iou* notiit wur ou-r visron for our main commercial corridor' nor does itcomply with intent oi Section aOe of our roniig oytaw, requiring many *aivers from these standards including:. 40g.7.1 General. All communications Facilities shall be designed and sited so as to have the least adversevisual effect on the environment't 40g.T.s.r scenic Landscapes and Vistas - personar \A/ireless service Facilities shall not be located within openareas that are discernable from prffi" touOt, t"cieationat areas' or residential devetopment'c408.7,6'lHeight,General.Regardlessofthetypeofmount,PersonalWirelessServiceFacilitiesshallbenohigher than ie,.,-r"jt aoou" ttre au-eiage heilni ol oiiuings within 300 feet of the proposed facilitv': 4ag.7.6,2 Height, Ground-Mounted Facilities. Ground-mounted Personal wireless service Facilities shall notproject higher ihan ten feet "bou"*ii.,e;;rs. ruito.ing h"ili'ii itir''*i" are no buildings within 300 feet' thesefacitiries "'ffi#ild;.iru;;;r-ih;;'Ln i""iiooue thdaveLse tree canopv heisht'. 40g.7Ja3 camouflage by Vegetation: lf communications Facilities are not camouflaged from public viewingareas by existing buitdings o, structures, they shail n" *urro,ino;Jlv-nrtrot gf dense tree growth and understoryvegetation in alidirections to creaie an effective y"u-ou-no uiu"in,tr"t Ground-mounied Personal wirelessservice Facilities shall provide a vegetated buffer of suffi"i"ni rr"W and depth to effectively screen the facility'The tower is highlv visible due to its height and the removal of the taller trees along the south and east side of the tower'essentially creating "n op*n area and "fir"in"ling all significant"";;il fto* noilt" Ze and some of Forest Road' Theproposed prantingi wlronry screen tn" gl;iJ;quipmlntwnicrr is"ioi'iiouseo insioe a structure' but is ground mountedin a fenced in area (screening of the nao rnou,ite'o transtor*"r"rn-i ;;;|";il;i oJ dead buffer tree should also beprovided). rne towiiooes not-compty *iitr tn" n"igfit iequiremens i,"t ub*utu it is less than 200'' The bylaw says 10'above the tree rine, but in no """* **"""jing z00rtin ci"u tner""a'rl";;ryAitd; in tne area;, so a waiverwould berequired.Aesthetics: lt is impossible to camouflage or screen a 110' tall cell tower which is further exacerbated by the removal ofthe taller stand of trees along Route 2g. i.'"ftt!i"pii"n wo.rlld n" io-""moutlage the tor,ver ln plain sight to make it a focalpoint rather *ran viiuar crutier. However, in" "ppiilunr" .utrgrpj i" loii"it ti'L aesthetic concerns-of this highly visiblesite by designing in* to*".. to simurate " ""r*r"t5**i, iu nignv'inJo;;;"i; ihe design.as presented reads rike a largesign from a freeway and racks the appropriii"li*ioio"taitJano o?"iir "i"r"nts..lt is-also ieferred to as a church toweron the site ptans and no clocks are shown. - without it neing propertv i;rig."J, ttre larger "clock towei' may end up havingmore negative visuat impacts, with three iarie Z.S' diame[ei.supdti;;E;;d tnreil+ wide x 42'5' long "clock" faces'rather than an obvious monopole cett towel."aotn design options aie [etrimentar to the goals the Town has been workingon for decades for enhance Route 28'Legar control: The Appricant needs.to have some form of regal control over the fall zones that also prohibits removal ofthe trees reried upon for screening in tn" ,iprication materi"ars ' pi""iJ" "n *ur"t"nt for the stormwater swales andinfitttution oasin, clrrently shown outside of any easement area'ApplicationAnalysis:Theapplicanth,aspreviouslydiscountedtheuseofaConcealedAntennaMonopole(CAM),useofother existing towErs, and ruled out otneiaiternutiue locations; ,no rJr ,* pr""iJed documentation on coverage gap andneed for the tocation and height. As this JiipiiJ"ii"i ir nionrv-t".r*i""i ir-nitur", the Planning Division recommends thatthe Zoning Board of Appears en-gage." pT#i"uil* of tie'speciai-Feimit application mateiials using the provisions ofch.53G anO proioi irp|.it to the B'oard as part of the Hearing process.consqrvation:Notpresent.Aportionofthesiieisinthefloodplain'coordinatewiththeConservationAgent.DesignReview:RefertotheattachedJune14,2022DesignReviewCommittee(DRC)CommentSheet''$ Enqineerinq:i \-- . provide drainage calculations to support the drainage design plan'/ t r Provide operation and maintenance plan'
^ rc; permits for fue| storage' lock.box for gate, clear tnarkings for gate access, some type of deterrent for@;#-,ffi;H# io luaou," 6r crimbing p"g"'io--pr"u;nt purroi. who mav enter the fenced areaHealth: Not Present.-fVe!gl: No corrments - LJRRead & Received bY APPlicant(s)t.''l.t t
12
4'SITE PLAN REVIEW GOMMENT SHEETFormalReviewApplicant resPonsesParcel: 189.150Persons Present:Amanda LimaWilliamsLt. Matt BearseYFDMark GsffiiettEffi-marvproposed wireless telecommunication facility monopole communication Tower and ground equipment'commentsRickSousa EsqJesse MorenoTab 4.lf necessary, waivers from the followingfollowing sections. The procedure for thSection 408.6.3 #1,#1C - Scaled planssections of the zoning bylaw shall be requested directly from the ZBA from theis is not clear, howevJr, Iwould assume it takes place in person at the hearing'and tree ssvsr. Most oi the Paqes of the Plans comply with the scalinq requirements'ISection 408.6.2 #5 & #6 regardiSection 408.6.3#2A - Sight lineSection 408.6.3 #2D - VisualSection 408.6.5 - Noise filing requirements,waiver?Relief will also be required from Section 4087.1 General - Allcommunicationfacilitiesshatt be designed and slfed so asto have the teast adverse visual effect on thee nv iron me nt. O nly se lf-su p porti ngmonopole type towers are permissible'Lattice towers, ort the use of ground anchorsand/or guy wires are Prohibited'
tm section 408.7 '6.2' Height. General - Groundmounted PWSF shall not project higher than ten. Applicant to seek relief frobeatto
Gommunitv Development and Planning:plannino Efforts & Zoninq: Throughout the cape cod commission Development of Regional lmpact (DRl) process, commentletters were submitted$tne Torin planner, ilanning Board and rown Administrator expressing serious co.ncerns about theheight, location and aeslhetics of this cell tower in a -nignty visible location within our main commercial corridor' Yarmouth isstriving to better itself, with redevelopment of our Rouie 28 corridor being front and center in our planning efforts' Throughzoning, growth inceniive zones, opportunity zones, vision planning, wastewater initiatives and MassDor streetscapeimprovements, we are concentrating resources and money to improvl this corridor and create an environment that fostersinvestment. This Tower does not fit with our vision for our main commercial corridor, nor does it comply with intent of section408 of our zoning bylaw, requiring many waivers from these standards including:l_40g.7.1General. All communications Facilities shall be designed and sited so as to have the least adverse visualeffect on the environment.o 40g.7.5.1 Scenic Landscapes and Vistas - Personal Wireless Service Facilities shall not be located within openareas that are discernable from public roads, recreational areas, or residential development. Application complies'o 40g.7.6.1 Height, General. Regardless of the type of mount, _Personal wireless Service Facilities shall be no higherthan ten feet above the averag-e height of buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility. The Application includesa waiver request for Heiqht.o 40g.7.6.2 Height, Ground-Mounted Facilities. Ground-mounted Personal Wireless Service Facilities shall not projecthigher than ten feet above the average building height or, if there are no buildings within 300 feet, these facilitiesshall not project higher than ten feeiabove the average tree canopy height. The ApPlication includes a waiverrequest for Heiqht.o 408.7.10.3 Camouflage by Vegetation: lf Communications Facilities are not camouflagedfrom public viewing areasby existingbuildings or structures, theYshall be surrounded by buffers of dense tree growthand understorY vegetationin all directionsto create an effective Year-roundvisual buffer. Ground-mounted PersonalWireless Service Facilitiesa vegetated buffer of sufficient height and depth to effectively screen the facility. The ProPosedshall provideaThe tower is highly visible due to its height and the removal of the taller trees alongthe south and east side ofthe tower, essentially creating an open areaand eliminating all significant screening from Route 28 and some ofForest Road. The proposed plantings will onlyscreen the ground equiPment whichis not housed inside astructure, but is ground mounted in a fenced in area(screening of the pad mounted transformerand replacementofdead buffertreeshould also be provided). The tower does not comply with the height requirements just becauseit is less than 200'. The bYlaw saYs10' above the tree line, but in no caseexceeding 200' (in casethere are verYtall trees in the area),so a waiver would be requiredToaD tn coveraqe.Aesthetics: lt is imPossible to camouflage or screen a1 10' tall cell tower which is further exacerbated by the removal of thetaller stand of trees alongRoute 28. Another oPtion would be to camouflagethe tower in plain sight to make it a focal pointrather than visual clutter. However, the applicant'sattempt to address the aestheticconcerns of this highly visible site bydesigningthe tower to simulate a "clock tower" is highlyinadequate. The design as presentedreads like a large sign from afreeway and lacks the aPProPriate level of details and design elements. lt is also referred toas a church tower on the siteplans and no clocks are shown.Without it being properly designed, the larger"clock tower" may end up having more negativevisual impacts,with three large2.5'diameter support poles and three 14'wide x42.5' long "clock" faces, rather than anll tower. Both design options are detrimentalto the goals theTown has been working on for decadesobvious monopole cefor enhance Route 28with the Town Design Review Committee.Leoal Control: The APPIicant needs to have some form of legalcontrol over the fall zones that also prohibits removal of thetrees relied upon for screeningin the application materials' Providebasin, currently shown outsideof any easementan easement for the stormwater swales and infiltration
Apolication Analvsis:The applicant has previously discounted the useof a Concealed Antenna Monopole (CAM), use ofother existing towers,and ruledout other alternative locations; and well asprovideddocumentation on coverage gaP andneed for the location andheight. As this aPPlication is highly technical in nature,the PlanningDivision recommends that theZoning Board of APPeals engage a Peer review ofthe Special Permit aPPlicationmaterials using the provisions of Ch.53Gand provide inPut to the Board as part of the Hearing processTheAoolicant isenable tokino aTconservation: Not present. A portion of the site is in the floodplain, coordinate with the conservation Agent'ISapplication.Desisn Review: Refer to the attached June 14, 2022 Design Review Committee (DRC) Comment Sheet'EnoinerrnoProvide drainage calculations to support the drainage designplan. Submitted with the Applicationr Provide operation and maintenance planiubmitted with the application.a
Fire: permits for fuel storage, lock box for gate, clear markings for gate access, some type of deterrent forblocking access to ladder or climbing pegs to prevent persons who may enter the fenced areaHealth: Not Present.Water: No comments - LJR
50Formal ReviewParcel: 189.1Towers lllSITE PLAN REVIEW COilNMENT SHEETuthDate:19,20221044LimaYFDB-2PProiec! SummarvProposed wireless telecommunication facility monopole communication Tower and ground equipment'l1;\ comments@)r",rornq: property is located in the 82 zoning district Proposal for a 110' cell tower will require relief from several::r:_.?$"::tl,""'"i:il3.PlJiil" ,o*n of yarmouth by speciar permit per section 408'4 or the Zonins Bvlaw rrom the ZoningBoard of APPeals,section 4og.4.1states that the ZBA may alter or waive one or more requirements of section 408 if it finds that thearteration or waiver of the requirements witi'ioft*-ig;t" t'.o* tr.r" i.Lni-oi il ;;y'; Appricant requested severalwaivers from certain sections of thezoning ;;;ffifffi "ppii.ution io spR. The purpose of sPR is to identify plans that;"n::,::1,:1i',,'.o,.T|,'I#',[J3,l:ilfiiJ:,tJ.i.3iil11l,Yi6ii13y,shar be requested direcrv from the ZBA from theforowing sections. The pro-cedure tor tnis iJ n"oi .r"ui, t o*"uir, i *orio'.."*" it takes prace in person at the hearing'S-""tion"aOa 0.3 #1 '#1 C - Scaled plans.and tree cover'section 4Og 6.2#5 & #6 regarding locationi ot ott']er personal wireless facilities's;;ii; 408'6'3#2A - sight line representation';;;ii;; aoe o.s #2D - Visual impact photographs';;;ii;; +oa o.s #38 - securitv barrier cutawav view'Section 408'6 3 *io ftitting ind proposec tree / planting heights';;;ffi aoa.o.s #3E - Grade changes and contours'confirm with ZBA that the criteria tor aoa.d.i;;iniioon test) has been met or schedule with ZBA'nn:lln::":l; HHll,.Xfr[|!iTi}8rY1i"3';'^"*' : ry ??ylu,ication facitities sha// be desisned and stred so asto have the teast adverse visuat effect on.iii riiiri"nt. ontv t;;i:;;;;;;'.rg ;iiopoti, tvpe towers are permissibte''i:!:!i:iyin;flltffiJik;t11il"',::fr 3z{!v?;{!-{'"i\:{e''iiii'f"'""'i;"ion on another structure is notreasibreysjlj"rt E:itt,m:ii;H$::i 33",if,?;l;,-lti*fii,,"*o_rocation is not feasibre to rhe zBArun,f* f:::t;Hil["tr""#i$*;1";::itffiil?'J"T"',:ii",i'i3lJ'l;lnred pwsF shail not project higherthan tenfeet above or tree canopy'section 40g.7.g Fart zones. communication towers, whether free standing or part of another structure or building' must beset back front a, property lines ny at teasi'tn'"i"irt'iiigilrr n, toiiii'i"rlriti," and its.appurtenances' lt is not clear atthis time if far zonescan incrude parking J;;;;;";;pilo oriroingl'o;i t-n!-"'iil propertv' i could not locate a lightinggf,ioiirB:i::fli""J'iffi:i,i,o-u,t;-il;', pl?Tril":,p.*narcon::Xj:i?:""j?[:X Jl#?igl!i::fi:i[:ffiTJ'3i'section 408.,10. section 40S.11 requires-inspediion ny owners .-d;ij;tSt""ij "u"ty 2 years and that documentation to[" "rppfi"O to the Building Department for the file'
) Communitv Development and Planning:.$r pranninq Efforts & Zoning: .Throughout the cape cod c_ommission Deveropment of .Regionar lmpact (DRl) process'. comment retters were su-bmitted by the io*n Fiunnur, pranning Board and rown Administrator expressing serousconcerns about the height, location ano aestnetics of this cell tower'lrilliir,ry uiriur" location within our main commercialcorridor, yarmouth is striving to betteiltr"rt, *iirr redevelopment oi *t noute 28 corridor being front and center in ourptannins efforts Through zoning, srowth tl"niiu" zones, bpport"iiitfi"{;lf11:;l4h:tn' w;astewater initiatives andMassDor streetscape improvements, we are concentrating resourcei and money to improve this corridor and create anenvironment that fosters investment. rr,ls iJ*ui J"", ,"tiit witlr our vision for our main commercial corridor' nor does itcomply wittr intent oi section 40g of our zoniig ovraw, requiring many waivett from these standards including:. 40g.7,1 General. All communications Facilities shall be designed ancl sited so as to have the least adversevisual effect on the environment'. 40g.7.5.1 scenic Landscapes and Vistas - personar wreress service Facilities shall not be located within openareas that are discernable from prfrci*ou, recreational areas, or residential development'. 408'7.6'1 Height General. Regardless of the type of mount, Personal Wireless Service Facilities shall be nohigher than ien-feet above tn" av*rag" height or njitcings within 300 feet of the proposed facility'. 408.7,6.2 Height, Ground-Mounted Facirities, Ground-mounted Personal wireless service Facilities shall notproject higher than ten feet unouJil.'" ;;;;"G buirding il6i';; ir tn"i"i.." no buildings within 300 feet' thesefacitities ,';;li;i;,;i;.i r]ig["ithu; ien teetinove the averise tree canopv heisht'c 40g.7.10,3 camouflage by Vegetation: lf communications Facilities are not camouflaqed from public viewingareas by existing buildings ol. ,tructurlr, they shall oe surrou"noJl ov rrutt"* of dense tree growth and understoryvegetation in all directions to create an effective y"nr-ro.ino- u[r"f n,t*' Ground-mounted Personal wirelessservice Facilities shal provide a vegetated buffer of suricieni r,"igrii "no depth to effectively screen the facility'The tower is highty visible due to its height and the removal of the taller trees along the south and east side of the tower'essentiary creating an open area and eri,.ninuring at significant.scr"".]rg tr"r n",/tg 28 and some of Forest Road' Theproposed pranting6 wil onry screen ff," gr;;ni',;quipri,ntwtricn is"n'oitiouieo insia" a structure' but is ground mountedin a fenced in area (screening or tne pal mount"'o transforrner'a;; *il;;il;nl of dead buffer tree should also beprovided), 'r" toivliooe, noi"orptv *iir, l'," r-."ight requireme.di;;i nl"uut" it is less than 200' The bylaw savs 10above the tree line, but in no "ur" """u"ding zo0rtin case there-a're very tall trees in the area)' so a waiver would berequired. {.,.rh^r ^v4^arharod hv the removal ofAesthetics: lt is impossible to camouflage or Screen a 1 10. tall cell tower which is further exacerbated by the rem.the tarer stand of trees along Route 2g. i."tn"i.pii"n wourd nu io "u,'routlage the tower in plain sight to make it a focalpoint rather than visuar crutier. Howeuur, ir.'-" uppii'.unt's "tt"mpt i" "ao=tt ire aesthetic concerns-of this highly visiblesite by designing ih;iowe, to simutate, .r*ki5*"rl'i, r,igr,ty in"i;q;"i; The design,as Dresented reads like a largesign from a freeway and racks the appropriJi"l"""i"t ctetaitJ ancr d"r;J;i;*"nti.. tt is"atso leferred to as a church toweron the site pr"n. liu'nJ ;ilrr, ;;" ;[o*n.-wifl.'out it being propurtv JE igned, the larger "clock tower" may end up havingmore negative visuat impacts, with three iarge 2.S',diameter.supdti;;E;;;d tlrreJta'wide x 42 S', long "clock" faces'rather than an obvious monopore cett towei,"golr, oesign options niu i"ttit.ntal to the goals the Town has been workingon for decades for enhance Route 28'Leqal control: The Applicant needs.to have some form of legal control over the fall zones that also prohibits removal ofthe trees reried upon for screening in th;';ppri;;tion materi-ats ' piouro" an easement for the stormwater swales andinfiltration basin, currently shown outside of any easement area'Application Analvsis: The applicant has previously discounted the use of a Concealed Antenna Monopo|e (CAM), use ofother existing to,rEis, and ruled out otr,eiatternative locationr; uno **Jr "s piovided documentation on coverage gap andneed for the rocation and height. As this li,lii""ii"" i, rrigirry tecr'ni"li in-nltrr*, the Planning Division recommends thatthe Zoning Board of Appeats engage. " pJ; *r;; 9f tie'Sp."i"i-F"ltit application materlals using the provisions ofCh,53G ano prouioe input to the Board as part of the Hearing process'conseryation: Not present. A portion of the site is in the floodplain, coordinate with the conservation AgentDesiqnReview:RefertotheattachedJunel4,zoz|DesignReviewCommittee(DRC)CommentSheet.'N Engineering::\.-'.' . Provide drainage calculations to support the drainage design plan/ \ ' Provide operation and maintenance plan
sD**:*li,Tl31ii,i[ffi;';'J",1ilfJlT:i:ifJ;"J"'fi:iffe?i""T;JJ5:'"J"o""rren'iforE!gI: No comments - LJRRead & Received bY APPlicant(s).L,..-.-''
13
ALTERNATIVESITE ANALYSIS1044 Route 28South Yarmouthn MA
STANDARD- Guidelines for DRI Review of wireless communicationTechnical Bulletin 97-001TowersXl.B.2. Demonstration that all existing structures have been identified and fairly rejected'a) Provide results from tower databases, town records, Cape Cod Commission maps'and other reasonably available resources to identify potential sites on existing structures'b) Provide aerial photographs of sufficient resolution and coverage to identifysignificant features .u.n"ut utility rights of way, towers, steeples, tanks' and otherexisting tall structures.c) For a) and b), consider area greater than the typical "search ring'" Extend searchfor existing structures to the a"cef,table coverage contours of adjacent sites'd) Provide propagation plots to demonstrate anticipated coverage from rejectedsites or structures.e) ldentify whether a combination of the existing structures considered in a' and b'could address the coverage and/or capacity problem defined in item 1)'f) provide documentation tnat demonstrates that sites with potentially good coverageare not available or otherwise unusable'BACKGROUNDThe radiofrequency ("RF") spectrum is an allotment of frequencies used for thetransmission of radio waves over long distances.l These radio waves carry data to andfrom devices used in terevision, AM and FM radio, XM/sirius satellite radio, DirecTV,LoJack, radar, garage door openers, baby monitors,. walkie talkies' cordless phones'and remote controls. This spectrum'is also utilized by wireless carriers like T-Mobileand AT&T to provide a wide variety of services such as phone' internet' email' videoand music clips, mobile television, text messaging, games, and software applications'Like visible light, radio waves require a clear "line of sight" in order to function properly'That is, there must be a clear, unobstructed path b-etween the transmitter and thereceiver. lf thero are any obstacles in this path, such as trees or buildings' the radiowaves can be attenuated Attenuation is a ieduction in signal strength of radio waves'The closer that the obstruction is to the transmitter or receiver, the greater that thesignal will be disruPted.SUMMARYBlue sky Towers lll, LLC ("Blue Sky") has nrepgrgd..this Alternative site Analysis inorder to describe the process for evaiuating potential sites for a wireless facility in southYarmouth, Massachusetts.1 The RF spectrum is just one part of the electromagnetic spectrum Th9 e-letrefuenciei of electromagnetic radiation, which includes visible light, x-rays,radiation, and gamma raYs,ctromagnetic spectrum contains allmicrowaves, infrared and ultraviolet
The process of identifying a technologically appropriate.location' as well as the needfor this communications facility is "JroviAed 'in the RF Analysis prepared by T-Mobile'sRFEngineerand RF R-eport'ut pt"ptt"d by.C Squared Systems' LLC forAT&T on Juty o, 2020. As certified in ihose reports, T-Mobile and AT&T haveidentified the need to add a new facility to its existing network of sites in this area ofYarmouth to improve coverage and capacity to a 99p in service that now existsthroughout much of Soutli Yarmouih. to maintain a reliable and robustcommunications ,yJ"t-f* the individuals, businesses, public ffe]y workers andothers who use its network, T-Mobile "nc nraf deploy a network of cell sites (alsocalled wireless communicaiions facilities) throughout the areas in which they arelicensed to provide service. Due to tecrrn6rogicafconstraints, there is limited flexibilityas to wher" " n"* ]".iiiiv can be lotated aio stitt function properly. The goal of thgsearch area is to define the permissinte ncation for placement of a cell site that willprovide adequate service in the subject cell, and also work properly as part of the overallnetwork.The area of the significant gap in coverage and capacity in this area of south Yarmouthconsists primarily 6t resiOeitiat properti"i, t""t"utional breas and ponds' T-Mobile andAT&T performed an extensive seaich of all existing structures within their search areasin order to find un uJpropriate site for a wireleis facility. There were no existingstructures in the area that were suitable for attachment of wireless equipment to close-Mobile and AT&T'snificantAerial Photo Showing Search Area
SITE IDENTTFICATION PROCESSusing the search areas identified by the radiofrequency engineers, T-.Mobile andnigi'r site acquisition specialists aitempted to locate tall buildings, structures orwireless towers within the search ring foi the co-location of its wireless equipment.Whenever, possible, T-Mobile and ATIT will co-locate on an existing structure insteadof building a new tower.The only identified existing telecommunications tower within the search is located at1045 Route 28. The telecommunications tower consists of a 70'tall monopole designedfor antennas mounted internally inside of canisters. The available centerline heights forthe instailation of the internaily mounted antennas is at 4s' and 3b' centerline heights'The available heights would not allow T-Mobile and AT&T to address the significant gapin coverage and capacity in their respective networks in this area of south Yarmouth'Furthermore, a monopote witn internally mounted .antenna rather than externallymounted on an unl"nnu platform involves reducing the number of antennas on thetower and limits spatial diversity causini diminution in performance resulting in a loss ofsignal strength that increases the iumber of dropped calls and disrupted datatransmissions.r€GIuDrollD6lgn0@Ucsu8qrtra.5soJll{!!alcilA-2o*a du' qr t $F:<,-oNEoEAEd@ffiffirr'tr-€ '=*#S-"xonfl E@aror fir.ffif75ffi-(ti'.'r '4i,/r(.f-a''F.l#-{tri?mmi-@+*cftrf.tr"-J.&ir @) r&@&-Jl,_ffiffi:@ #-
T-Mobile and AT&T'g agents were unable to find an existing structure that would closeits significant gap in wireless coverage. lt was therefore necessary to find a "raw land"site and construct a tower in order to close the gap. Blue Sky then attempted to locateu p.p"rty used for commercial or institutional purposes within the search area for theconstruction of a new wireless facility that also possessed the necessary attributes forsiting a new telecommunication tower. Blue sky analyzed numerous properties withinthe Jearch area to find a site that would meet the following criteria:o Sufficient ground space to permit construction of a wireless facility;. Sufficient and unobstructed airspace to allow for the installation and maintenanceof the tower, and effective propagation of wireless signals;r sufficient setback from lot lines, public ways, and residential structures;, Adequate screening between proposed facility and residential areas;. Topography that does not prevent the effective propagation of wireless signals;o Avoidance of locations that would be in close proximity to residential structures;r Avoidance of locations within or close to historical structures or districts;e Avoidance of locations within wetlands or other environmentally sensitive areas;n Lack of adverse title conditions in land records for the property;o Lack of environmental contamination at the site and in the surrounding area;o Appropriate separation from airports, heliports, instrument approach area, orother aviation structure or area as required by the Federal AviationAdministration;. proper soil conditions to ensure that the tower foundation will be secure;o Ability to bring utilities (power and telephone) onto the property;o Unobstructed vehicle access to the area of the proposed facility; and" Ability to secure a lease with the landowner on commercially reasonable terms'ln considering the location for the wireless communications facility, Blue Sky alsoconsidered cdmpliance with Town of Yarmouth Zoning Bylaws. The Bylaws imposestandards for vegetative screening, height and setbac,k distances. when consideringlocations for the proposed wireleis coirmunications facility, Blue Sky endeavored to
findapropertythatwouldallowforcompliancewiththeprovisionsandintentoftheTown of Yarmouth Zoning BYlaws'The only commercially or institutionally used lot in the area that was of sufficient area'satisfied lot coverage requirement, ani otr"r"ou vegetative screening is the property at1044 Route 2g. Armost ail other rots in the area are used for residentiar purposes thatare too small or ui" .ot*ercially ;; properties that are too crowded' lackedvegetative ,"ru"ninf'JnJ *"t" therefore ruled out as feasible alternatives'This Analysis concludes that the site on the 1044 Route 28 property is the most suitablesite to support tne necessary facility io iio." T-Mobile's and AT&T's significant gap incoverage.CONCLUSIONBased on the requirements of the Town of Yarmouth Zoning Bylaws' theexisting conditions unOl"nO use and forthe above listed reasons as well as theresurts of the review and anarysis, the-rocation at 1044 Route 28 is the only feasiblelocation for the proposed facility'
JOB $: 17-056DESIGNED BY: JMM/TEJREVISIONSREV. f:DDRAWN BY:STZBISSUED FOR REVIEW4/20/22DATE:ISSUED FOR REVIEWPS-3SEE PLANSCALE:DISSUED FOR REVIEWALTERNATIVE ANALYSISSITE NAME: SOUTH YARMOUTHSITE NUMBER: MA.S1041044 ROUTE 28SOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC352 PARK STREETSUITE 106NORTH READING, MA 01864APPLICANTProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4 Boy RoodBulldins A, Sulte 200Hodloy, MA 01035(41 3)320- 4e1 I
NoPARTIAL SITE PLANSCALE: 1"=400' (11x17)JOB f: 17-056DESIGNED BY: JMM/TEJREVISIONSREV. f:UDRAWN BY:STZBISSUED FOR REVIEW4/20/22DATE:cISSUED FOR REVIEWPS.2SEE PLANSCALE:DISSUED FOR REVIEWALTERNATIVE ANALYSISSITE NAME: SOUTH YARMOUTHSITE NUMBER: MA-51041044 ROUTE 28SOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC352 PARK STREETSUITE 106NORTH READING, MA 0i864APPLICANT:ProferraDESIGN GROUP, LLC(413)320-4s1 ISuite 20001 0J54 Boy RoodBullding A,Hodlcy, MA
MASSDEPWETLANDJOB f: 17-056DESIGNED BY: JMM/TEJREVISIONSREV. S:DDRAWN BY:STZBISSUED FOR REVIEW+/20/22DATE:ISSUED FOR REVIEWPS.1SEE PIANSCALEDISSUED FOR REVIEWALTERNATIVE ANALYSISSITE NAME: SOUTH YARMOUTHSITE NUMBER: MA-51041044 ROUTE 28SOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC352 PARK STREETSUITE 106NORTH READING, MA 01864APPLICANT:Prdl-erraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4 Bqv RoodBuildlig A, Sulte 200Hodley, MA 01035(413)32o- 4s18
NO RESPONSE/NOTINTERESTED BY OWNERTO MAILERASA MAILL.I-{ KEYBST SITE/CHURCIlPARCEL IDREJECTED PROPERTYRESIDENTIAL AREACOMMERCIAL AREAJOB f: 1 7-056DESIGNED BY: JMM/TEJREVISIONSREV. f:DDRAWN BY:STZBISSUED FOR REVIEW4/20/22DATE:ISSUED FOR REVIEWSPSEE PLANSCALEISSUED FOR REVIEWDALTERNATIVE ANALYSISSITE NAME: SOUTH YARMOUTHSITE NUMBER: MA-51041044 ROUTE 28SOUTH YARMOUTH. MA 02664BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC352 PARK STREETSUITE 106NORTH READING, MA 01864APPLiCANT:DESIGN GROUP, LLCPrdl-erra4 Bov RoodEulldi'no A, Suite 200Hodley; MA 01035(413)520-4s18
14
Environmental SoundAssessmentWireless Communications FacilitySite MA-51041044 MA Route 28South Yurmouth, Mussuchusetts 02 664Revised - December 20,2022Prepared For:BlueSWTowers III, LLCBlue Sky Towers III' LLC352Park Street, Suite 106N. Reading, MA 01864Prepared By:Modeling Specialties30 Maple RoadWestford, MA 01886ModelingSpecialties
ENVIRO, SOI]ND ASSN,SSMENTBlue Sky Towers III,LLC, T-Mobile and AT&T propose to build and operate a WirelessTelecommunications Facility in South Yarmouth, Massachusetts to support personalwireless communication in the area. The proposed installation will include antennasmounted on a new 115-foot church tower. Supporting electronic equipment will be ina fenced compound at the foot of the tower. T-Mobile and AT&T are already planningto be anchor tenants for the facility, which will also be made available for co- locators.This report addresses the existing sound levels in the area, sources of sound expectedat this installation and an evaluation ofits potential to affect the neighboring land uses.While only two wireless tenants are currently committed to the proposed facility, itis designed to supporl up to four commercial wireless catriers and their equipment.The equipment configuration and siting were designed specifically to minimizeenvironmental effects.What has Changed since the Previous Study?The mounting structure for the proposed antennas has changed along with its overallheight. The propane tanks have moved and the area of the compound has decreased. Asnoted in the study, the antennas and infrastructure have no potential of emitting sound.The only sources of significant sound are the equipment cabinets and generators. Theirlocations and configurations are the same as previously reported. The report's graphicsand text have been updated to reflect the stated changes. The modeling study wasupdated to the new layout, but the results are identical to the previous iteration oftheSound Study. Tabular and graphical summaries of the results are provided.Overview of Project and Site VicinityThe project is located on the site of a Catholic Church in South Yarmouth, MA. Theexisting building is relatively small and surrounded by a large parking area. The terrainis reasonably flat so most receivers have direct line-of-sight to the potential sounds fromthe facility equipment compound. There is an existing deciduous forest on the southwestcomer of the lot, which was defoliate at the time of the field survey. For these reasons,the site will be conservatively modeled without any shielding benefit of terrain or forest.Daytime and nighttime field measurements were made to survey existing conditions.The equipment sound was estimated using vendor data and measurements made atsimilar installations. The comesponding levels expected at the nearby sensitive locationswere estimated using noise modeling techniques prescribed in acoustical literature.Blue Sky Towers II plans provided the necessary information to support the evaluationof project sounds. This study is based on the plans issued by the ProTena Design Groupdated November 28,2022. This conservative study is based on the highest sound levelsthat the equipment is expected to make even though it makes that sound only a smallfraction of the time. Figure t has a backdrop of a Google aerial image and is annotatedto show the proposed site, surounding area and nearby receptor locations with theirorientations and distances to the nearest proposed equipment.IBlue Sky ktwers lll, LLC / S. YarmouthSound Assessment
O Measurement L.ocation
Q ModelingRecepor
SCALEN TEET
-
Base from Google
1000
Figure 1: Project Area Showing the Proposed Equipment Compound and Nearest Receptors
2Blue Sky Towers III, LLC / S. Yarmouth SoundAssessment
Discussion of General Noise Analysis MethodsThere are a number of ways in which sound (noise) levels are measured and quantified.All of them use the logarithmic decibel (dB) scale. Following is a brief introduction tothe noise measurement terminology used in this assessment.Noise MetricsThe Sound Level Meter used to measure noise is a standardized instrument.l It contains"weighting networks" to adjust the frequency response of the instrument to approximatethat of the human ear under various circurnstances. One of these is the A-weightingnetwork. A-weighted sound levels emphasize the middle frequency sounds and de-emphasize lower and higher frequency sounds; they are reported in decibels designatedas "dBA." A11 broadband levels represented in this study are weighted using the A-weighting scale. Figure 2 illustrates typical sound levels produced by sources that arefamiliar to most people.The sounds in our environment usually vary with time, so they cannot always bedescribed with a single nurnber. Two methods are used for describing variable sounds.These are exceedance levels and equivalent level. Both are derived from a large numberof moment-to-moment A-weighted sound level measurements. Exceedance levels aredesignated Ln, where "n" can have any value from 0 to 1 00 percent. For example:i Lso is the sound level in dBA exceeded 90 percent of the time during themeasurement period. The Lqo is close to the lowest sound level observed. It isessentially the same as the residual sound level, which is the sound level observedwhen there are no loud, transient noises.o Lso is the median sound level: the sound level in dBA exceeded 50 percent of thetime during the measurement period.I Lro is the sound level in dBA exceeded only 10 percent of the time. It is close to themaximum level observed during the measurement period. The Lro is sometimescalled the intrusive sound level because it is caused by occasional louder noises likethose from passing motor vehicles.By using exceedance levels, it is possible to separate prevailing, steady sounds (Lqo)from occasional, louder sounds (Lro) in the environment.American National Standard Specificationfor Sound Level Meters, ANSI S1.4-1983, published by the StandaldsSecretariat of the Acoustical Society of America, NY.3Blue Sky Towers lll, LLC / S. YarmouthSound Assessment
Common lndoor SoundsRock BandFood BlcndcrCarbagc DisposalVacuum CleanerTV/Radio ListeningNormal ConversationGommon Outdoor SoundsChain Sawlnsidc NY Subway TrainTruck at 100 ft.Gas Larvn Mower at 100 ft.Auto at 50 ft. (40 mph)Ilcavily Travcllcd Ilighway at 1000 ft.dBADishrvasher itt Ncxt RooutModcratc Rainfall on FolingcBird Calls at 100 ft.Snrall Brook aJ 25 ft,Refi'igerator'LibraryBedroom nt NightRural Community (no nearhy sounds)Threshold of Hearing (lahorntory)Figure 2: Typical Sound Levels from Everyday Experience11010090807o60504030201004Blue Slq Towers III, LLC / S. YarmouthSound Assessment
2The equivalent level is the level of a hypothetical steady sound that has the same energyas the actual fluctuating sound observed. The equivalent level is designated L.o, and isalso A-weighted. The equivalent level is strongly influenced by occasional loud,intrusive noises. When a steady sound is observed, all of the Ln and Leq are equal.In the design of noise control treatments, it is essential to know something about thefrequency spectrum of the sound of interest. Noise control treatments do not functionlike the human ear, so simple A-weighted levels are not useful for noise-control designor the identification of tones. The spectra of sounds are usually stated in terms of octaveband sound pressure levels in dB, with the octave frequency bands being thoseestablished by standard.z The sounds at the proposed site were evaluated with respectto the octave band sound pressure levels, as well as the A-weighted equivalent soundlevel. Only the A-weighted values are presented here since they represent the moreeasily recognized sound scale that is relevant to the Town and regional standards.Noise Regulations and CriteriaSound compliance is judged on two bases: the extent to which governmental regulationsor guidelines are met, and the extent to which it is estimated that the community isprotected from the excessive sound levels. The govemmental regulations that may beapplicable to sound produced by activities at the project site are summarized below.Federal. Occupational noise exposure standards: 29 CFR 1910.95. This regulation restrictsthe noise exposure of employees at the workplace as referred to in OSHArequirements. Workers will not routinely attend this facility. Furthermore, thefacility will ernit only occasional sounds of modest levels, as demonstrated by thisstudy.State. In Massachusetts, noise is regulated as an air pollutant. 3 1 0 CMR $7' 10 Uqualitatively prohibits "unnecessaly emissions from [a] source of sound that maycause noise". This is interpreted quantitatively by MDEP's Fonn BWP AQ SFP3and their DAQC Policy 90-001. The MDEP's Noise Policy states that a newnoise intrusion may not increase the broadband sound level by more than 10 dBAover the pre-existing Lqo ambient level. Tonal sounds, defined as any octave bandlevel that exceeds the levels in adjacent octavebands by 3 dB ormore, are alsoprohibited. The MDEP usually defers to applicable quantitative local ordinanceswhen available.American National Standard Specificationfor Octave, Half-octave and Third-octave Band Filter Sets, ANSIsl.l 1-1966(R197s).5Blue Sky Towers III, LLC / S. YarmouthSound Assessment
Locsl. The Town of Yarmouth Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 104. Noise) providesqualitative limits on sounds produced between 11:00 pm and 7:00 am'Regional Wireless Ordinances also provide quantitative sound requirements of theequipment at this facility shown in the excerpt below:408.7.13.3 Ground-mounted equipment for Personal Wireless Service Facilities shall not,during normal operation, generate noise in excess of 5o db (non-continuous) at theproperty line.This analysis presents sound levels at the property line as specified by the ordinance,but also includes receptors representing other sensitive community locations.Existing Community Sound LevelsA site survey and noise measurement study were conducted on December 18, 2018 tomeasure the existing sound levels at and around the site. Additional measurements weremade on September 14, 2020 to update the dataset. The measured levels includedoccasional intrusive sound from traffrc, commercial activities, birds and small aircraft.The area around the church is paved for access and parking. The parking lots aresurrounded by deciduous forest, which was defoliate at the time of the 2018 survey andfoliate in 2020. In both cases, the nighttime surveys were conducted during the quiethours of the night on the same day as dalime conditions. The routine operation of thegenerators is never expected at night, but the nighttime sound levels were used as areference for the character ofthe existing sound and the routine facility operation.Me as ur ement Metho dol o glSince sound impacts are greatest when existing sound levels are lowest, this study wasdesigned to measure community sound levels under conditions typical of "quiet periods"for the area. This study uses methodology to support a MDEP type study (increase inambient) and also supports the property line analysis. The MDEP uses the backgroundmetric (Lso), which statistically excludes all non-steady sources. The Lqo metric givesthe lowest 10 percent of the many samples gathered during a 20-minute measurementtaken in the project area. Meteorological conditions during the surveys were all withinthe ANSI required conditions to conduct sound measwements. This includesrepresentative seasonal temperatures, calm or light winds and no precipitation (or waterstanding on roadways). A11 meteorological conditions were noted from fieldobservations, but were also compared to the reports at Barnstable Municipal Airport,MA (KHYA). It is typical for airport winds to be higher than measured in thecommunity because they are measured at elevated locations in widely open areas.Measurements were made within the open paved area at the approximate setback of theneighboring residences and equipment compound. Based on spot observations in thearea, the levels represent both the site and the nearby community locations. All6Blue Slcy Towers III, LLC / S. YarmouthSound Assessment
measurements were attended and made with a Rion NA-28 sound level meter. Themeter meets the requirements of ANSI Sl.4 Type I - Precision specification for soundlevel meters. The meter was mounted at approximately 5 feet above the ground. Themicrophone was fitted with factory recommended foam windscreen. The meter wasused to sample the environmental sound and to process the sound into various statisticalmetrics for use in this analysis. The meter is equipped with real time octave band filterset, which allowed it to process sound levels into 1/3 octave bands. While frequencyspecific data were collected, the survey results are reported only in combined A-weighted levels for simplicity and consistency with the criteria. The filters comply withthe requirements of the ANSI S 1 - I I for octave band filter sets. The meter was calibratedin the field using a Larsen Davis Cal-200 sound level calibrator before and after themeasurement sessions. The results of the field calibration indicated that the meter didnot drift during the study.The results of the surveys allow both quantitative and qualitative analyses of theacoustical environment surrounding the proposed equipment. The characterization ofambient sound levels reflects the variations caused by volume of traffrc on localroadways, occasional aitctaft passes and community sounds.Meusurement ResultsThe measured background levels in the project area ranged from 50 dBA during thedaytime to 37 dBA in the quietest hours of the night. The corresponding Leq valuesrange from 59 dBA to 48 dBA. The measurement results are summarized in Table LTable 1: Measured BackgroundSound Levels in the Proiect AreaPeriodTimeLeq dBALso dBA2018 Daytime8:55 AM59502018 Nighttime4:30 AM48372020Daytime7:35 AM58482020 Nighttime4:32 ANI5146Sounds from the Proposed InstallationThe project's current plans include T-Mobile and AT&T equipment and provide someengineering detail for their proposed equipment. The tower is expected to attract othercarriers, but each carrier designs their system based on the particular needs oftheirnetwork. For that reason, this study addresses the sound from only the equipmentproposed in the current plan. Cabling and piping for utilities will be underground.The tower, infrastructure and most of the equipment planned for this facility has nopotential of emitting sound. Only two types of sources are planned for this facility asquantified in this study. The antennas will be supported by cabinet mounted radioelectronics and generators at the foot of the tower.7Blue Sl+y Towers III, LLC / S. YarmouthSound Assessment
0a
o(,
!0
(A
o{
oa
Fo
Lll
o
oo
p-
FD
o.
+o
rnX
@
oa
4
0c-o
b
G
l-,N
N
ao
t--t..o
h
o
s9
-l
'---
r.v::I
lx,
ix
t_la
.-t
i
aaJOoq
OC
oo
to
zo
!
Fz
.,.,xs
':i=
<t-t9loll:ol'l=]
it *:
I l___l
t
q
6
€
Il*
ao
fo
aJ
6'
d
Oo
-o
a
-<m
ol-.'-@
--+-go
$Ef
a
9L
@
Tmm--t
(^
o-
s_
!hq
h
(\
..-'-f t !I I ---T:..- : !-'--t i I
t-
I
T-Mobile RF EqmtBehind ShroudAT&T RF EqmtBehind ShroudGround EqurpmenlWrlhin Fenced Conrpound6 ft Stockade Fence-\L \.. )l- './r'i lIrGraphic Scale in FeetELEVATIONFigure 4: Elevation Plan Showing the Verlical Character of the Church Tower and Compound1ll1+ilrililjjil1illillil#Nllllllillilllilllllll9Blue Sky Towers III, LLC / S. YarmouthSound Assessment
Routine Sound EmissionsThe only routine sound emissions planned from the proposedT-Mobile equipment is from the electronics cabinet fans. Thesmall fans in the cabinet draws outside air through the unit. Ithas a smooth broadband character that produces about 50 dBAat 3 feet from the unit. The field image to the right has an insetshowing that the rear or sides have no louvered openings.Therefore, the T-Mobile cabinets only emit sound in theforward direction. Three cabinets are planned, but only onefaces the sensitive west direction. The modeling is based on asingle unit emitting in every direction.In a similar way, the AT&T Walk-In-Cabinet (WIC) is usuallycooled by ambient air. The WIC cooling fans increase in speedas the need for cooling increases. Their sound at full speedexceeds the modest sound from the door mounted cooler. Thecooler engages before the full speed fans are needed, usuallyabout 90o F. The highest sound is expected from the WIC isabout 50 dBA at 23 ft. The fans on the WIC will operatecontinuously, so there will be no variation from moment tomoment or cycling from equipment startup. Fans are mounted onthe inside of the cabinets (which will always remain closed). Inthis way, the cabinet configuration is designed for minimal effecton the surrounding area. The sketch to the right shows the cooleron the front of the AT&T WIC. For most sites, the sound fromthe cabinets is a non-issue because they are such modest sources.They are modeled here as the highest expected nighttime soundemission.Door MountedAir CoolerAT&T's WICScale FEET012 1t=E-N o n- Ro utin e S o u nd EmisslbnsThe installation will include two generators installed inside sound reducingenclosures. T-Mobile proposes a propane-fired 36 kW Kohler 36CCL Seriesgenerator. The system is rated at only 57 dBA at23 feet during theequipment tests. This low sound level is far below typical sound fromgenerators of a comparable output.AT&T proposes a propane-fired Polar 15 kW generator. As a DC unit, itprovides support in a very different way than the more familiar ACgenerators. A DC generator will only operate to the level demanded bythe load. It has a capacity to produce 15 kW which may be demanded inan emergency. But it will have no load during routine tests so the unitwill essentially operate at a high idle during the test. The full load soundrating is 59 dBA, but the sound level associated with the generator test isabout 56 dBA at 23 feet from the unit. Since the emergency operation is considered an upset condition, thetest condition is modeled for this study.Blue Sky Towers III, LLC / S. Yarmoutht0Sound Assessment
Project Sound Level Mitigation FeaturesThe proposed generators will be monitored remotely and tested regularly to assure thesafe and effective operation of the equipment during a loss of utility power. Variousdesign features were implemented at this facility to reduce the potential sound. Theequipment location is as far as practical from sensitive locations while meeting the hostrequirements. The primary source of facility sound is the infrequent operation of thegenerators. Again, the generators were placed as far as practical from the sensitivedirections. A supplementary 6-foot sound barrier is planned to further shield thereceivers from generator sound. The carriers selected generator models that are highlymitigated for sound. For example, a typical residential generator in the 4,000-watt rangecommon in most communities operates at about 70 dBA at23 feet. Both of the plannedunits are far higher capacity, yet each is expected to operate below 60 dBA at thereference distance. Worst-case modeling of the facility assumes simultaneous operationof the two generators (which is unlikely). Together, they are expected to operate at alevel lower than the existing measured ambient at the property line. The Cape CodCommission recommendation that LP fuel be used further quiets the operation. Gaseousfuel is quieter, but also lowers the equipment profile by eliminating the belly tank. Thisincreases the benefit ofthe proposed sound shields.Modeling DetailsNoise prediction modeling was performed using CADNA software under downwindweather conditions as assumed in the standard ISO 9613-2. Table 2 summarizes themodeling input parameters.Table 2:Modeling Input ParametersItemModeling Input and Desg.!p!!94_TerrainFlat Terrain assumedTemperature100cRelative Humiditv70%Weather Condition6.5 mph, directly from facility toGround Attenuation0.2. hard surface (0.5 : soft ground, 0.0: pure reflection)Atmospheric InversionCONCAWE - Catesory F**# ofSound Reflections2Receptor Heisht1.5 meter above ground level* Propagation calculations incorporate the adverse effects ofcertain atmospheric andmeteorological conditions on sound propagation, such as gentle breeze o/ l to 5 m/s(lSO 1996-2: 1987)from source to receiver.** Category F represents a stable atmosphere that promotes noise propagation.Sound Level Modeling ResultsSince all the equipment with the potential to emit sound will be at ground level, thesound will be shielded in some directions by other equipment and surrounding forest.The sound barriers are also included in the modeling, but the conservative study didnot take any credit for attenuation by the forest. The worst-case equipment levels willbe 45 dBA or less at the property line. This is lower than the daytime ambient level of48 dBA. Sounds that are less than the arnbient level rnay be heard but are not noticedin a typical community. For this reason, the daytime tests are expected to beBlue Sky T'owers III, LLC / S. YarmouthilSound Assessment
compatible with existing daytime traffic and community sources and not be noticed atthe residences beyond the property line. Tables 3 and 4 provide a summary of themodeling results. A graphical summary of the results is also provided in Figure 5.Table 3: Summarv of Modeling Results of Property Line Sound LevelsReceptorLocationDist(Ft)Ambient LevelDav/Nieht (dBA)HVAC Only(dBA)With Generators(dBA)Comply?P/L SW12848/373945YesTable 4Summary of Modeling at the other Area SensitiveConclusionsReceptorLocationDist(Ft)Ambient LevelDay (dBA)CombinedSound (dBA)Increase(dB)Res SWI2084838+1Res SW22804836+0Res SW33364837+0Res West2104840+1Bank, East2504844+1The potential sound of the proposed Wireless Telecommunications Facility wasevaluated using measured fie1d data and numerical modeling methods. Ambient soundlevels were established by field measurernents using equipment that is standardized tothe current ANSI standards. Equipment operating sound levels were quantified usingvendor estimates confirmed by representative fie1d measurement at other installations.Much of the time, the proposed facility will produce no significant sound. The cabinetfans will operate continuously at a very low level of sound that will be well below theambient level, so are never expected to be noticed in the community.Infrequently, for one half-hour per week, the proposed facility sounds will include thedaytime testing of the emergency generators. The combined sound from the T-Mobileand AT&T generators is expected to be the worst-case daytime sound level. During asimultaneous test, the facility sound is expected to be 45 dBA or less at the property line.The analysis shows that the facility sources will usually emit no sound that would benoticed outside the equipment compound. The cabinet fans will operate as needed toprotect the cabinet electronics without affecting the community. Under high ambienttemperatures, usually above 85" F, the cabinet heat load may trigger elevated fan poweror the supplementary cooling system on the WIC. Another infrequent event is theroutine test of the facility generators. The study is based on the facility's worst-casesound, which is a rare combination of both the high fans and generators. The results ofthe study indicate the worst-case facility equipment sound will remain withincompliance goal of 50 dBA at the properly line. It also meets the MDEP standard withonly a minor increase in sound at the receptors. In this way, the study indicates thefacility is expected to rneet applicable noise standards under all operational conditions.Blue Sky Towers lll, LLC / S. Yarmoutht2Sound Assessment
6A
O mor,r*nrr* Laetion
O uooetinERecegor
SCALEN TEET
Base
#!GA
476A
38GA
Figure 5: Graphical Summary of the Facility Sound Modeling with Cabinets plus Generators
Blue Sky Towers III, LLC / S. Yarmouth t3 SoundAssessment
15
Dov,qtn L. HAES, JR., CHP, CLSORadiation SafetY SPecialistPO Box 198, Hampstead, NH 03841 617-680-6262Email : donald-haes-chp@comcast.netSeptember 4,2020RE: Installation of radio base station antennas and associated equipment for the proposedBlue Sky Towers III, LLC monopole at 1044 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MA'PunpospI have reviewed the information pertinent to the proposed installation at the above location.To determine regulatory compliance, theoretical calculations of maximal radio-frequency (RF)fields have been prepared. The physical conditions are that T-Mobile and AT&T proposes to installpersonal wireless services (PWS) directional panel antennas (several antennas each in three,,arrays" aimed along three different azimuths) on a proposed Blue Sky Towers III, LLC monopole'For proposed location, see Figure 2. The monopole is proposed to be 120 feet tall, above groundlevel (AGL). The proposed installation will allow T-Mobile and AT&T to continue deploymentof their wireless telecommunication systems. The monopole is designed to host two additionalpWS provider's antennas (See Figure 3). This report includes not only the T-Mobile and AT&T,but the hypothetical condition of being "loaded" to capacity'This report considers the contributions of allthe proposed T-Mobile and AT&T, along withtwo additional hypothetical PWS transmitters operating at their typical FCC licensed capacities'The calculated values of RF fields are presented as a percent of current Maximum PermissibleExposures (%MpE) as adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC),i'ii and thoseestablished by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH)'iiiSunInnnRvTheoretical RF field calculations data indicate the summation of the proposed T-Mobileand AT&T maximum pws RF contributions would be within the established RF exposureguidelines; see Figure 4. The additional calculations also suggest that even if the monopole hadtwo additional PWS provider's antennas attached, the site would comply with all established RFexposure guidelines; see Figure 5.This includes all publicly accessible areas, and the surrounding neighborhood in general.The results support compliance with the pertinent sections of the Massachusetts Department ofpublic Health regulations regarding PWS facilities, and the FCC's guidelines for RF exposure.Based on the results of the additional theoretical RF fields I have calculated, it is my expertopinion that this facility would comply with all regulatory guidelines for RF exposure.Note: The analyses, conclusions and professional opinions are based upon the precise parameters and conditions olthis particular site; Monopoleat 1044 Route 2g, South yarmouth, MA. Utilization ofthese analyses, conclirsions and_professional opinions for any personal wireless servicesinstallation, existing or proposed, other than the aforementioned has not been sanctioned by the author, and therefore should not be accepted asevidence ol regulatory compliancePage 1 of13
ExposuRp Ltnntrs ANn GUnELINESRF exposure guidelines enforced by the FCC were established by the American NationalStandards Institute (ANSI)i" and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement(NCRp)." The pp. exposure guidelines are listed for RF workers and members ofthe public. Theapplicable FCC RF exposure guidelines for the public are listed in Table l, and depicted in Figure1. All listed values are intended to be averaged over any contiguous 3O-minute period. Note thatlimits for 'oRF workers" are five times those listed in Table 1.Tabte 1: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Values in Public AreasFrequency BandsElectric FieldsMagnetic FieldsEquivalent Power DensitY0.3 - 1.34 MHz614 (V/m)1.63 (A/m)(100) mWcm21.34 - 30 MHz82atf $tm)z.tetf (Nm)(100) mWcm230 - 300 MHz27.5 (Ylm)0.073 (A/m)0.2 mWcm2300 - 1500 MHzf 11500 mWcmz1500 - 100,0001.0 mWcm2-r-brdff.b dsdFry&ffi&-&.rtm.0r00.0e.rit-! .r.lo0l'O0.r0.0,0 J{X}FrcqEscy (ltEz)3,00030,000Figure 1: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)NOTE: FCC "sVo Rule" - When the exposure limits are exceeded in an accessible area due tothe emissions from multiple fixed RF sources, actions necessary to bring the area into complianceare the shared responsibility of all licensees whose RF sources produce, at the area in question,levels that exceed 5% of the applicable exposure limit proportional to power. u'Page 2 of 13
Factltrv Locarton ANn Butt u-OurFigure 2: Proposed Monopole Location1.044 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MA(Picture courtesy Google Earth Pro@ and may not represent cuwent conditions,)Figure 3: Hypothetical Loading of Monopole1044 Route 280 South Yarmouth, MA(Picture courtesy PRO TERRA, LLC..)(P) AT&T RFEOUIPIENIoTHERS), IYPRF(F)(BY(P) T-UO8iL€ RFEQIJIPISNTPage 3 of 13
INTROOUCTORY IXT.ONNNITION: MAKING SSNSO OF THE 66G',SThere are many references to the so-called "generation" of wireless technologies in use. Each new,.generation,, of wireless technologies has colloquially been designated a numbered "G"'l The latest "G"to come out, the fifth generation of wireless technologies or so called "5G", has attracted extensiveresearch interest, both inside and outside the scientific community. According to the 3'd generationpartnership project,2 5G networks should support three major families of applications: (i) Enhancedmobile broadband; (Z) Machine type communications, and (3) Ultra-reliable and low-latencycommunications. There are also enhanced "vehicle-to-everything" communications which are expectedto be supported by 5G networks. These situations require much more "connectivity" than the latest fourthgeneration (aka"4G" or o'Long Term Evolution (LTE)") networks can handle'Thus, new networks must be able to handle this high system throughput, in addition to supportingexisting older technologies still in use. This is being accomplished through additional spectrumassignments both higher and lower than currently assigned frequencies used by PWS facilities' In fact,currently deployed 5G networks are operating at frequencies once used by television stations.Nonetheless, frequencies assigned by the FCC for 5G use are all within the bands currently underregulatory oversight, including setting safe limits of exposure to RF energy for both workers, and membersof the public. Just recently (12020) the FCC has reaffirmed the efficacy of their regulatory exposurelimits to RF energy, including those for 5G. From an RF safety standpoint, there is nothing peculiar aboutthe fifth generation of wireless technologies that would set it apart from any of the other advancements oftechnologies; including the first two generations (first analog then digital communications), the thirdgeneration (the first to be referred to a numbered-series as "3G"), and the currently deployed fourthgenerations (LTE). Recently published studies in peer-reviewed journalsuii have shown typical exposuresto RF energy from operating 5G systems to be well-within the exposure limits'The FCC currently has categories for Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS): Category "A"refers to a lower power base station, Category ooB" must be deployed outdoors and has higher maximumpower limits compared with category 'oA" devices, and category "c". The maximum allowableEquivalent Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP; the total RF power radiated by the antenna') is 30 dBm(l watt), 47 dBm(50 watts), and 62dBm (1585 watts) for the listed categories "A", "B", and'0C", per 10MHz of bandwidth, resPectivelY.r pWS ,,Generations": lG: Analog voice; 2G: Digital voice; 3G: Mobile data; 4G: LTE and mobile Intemet; 5G: Mobilenetworks interconnect people, coritrol machines, 6bjects, and devices with multi-Gbps peak rates and ultra-low latency'2 soURCE: (https://www.3gpp.ore/about-3gpp) The 3'd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) unites [Seven]telecommunicutions ,tandurd-f"ueiopment organizations (ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TSDSI, TTA, TTC), known as,,organizational partners,, and provides their members with a stable environment to produce the Reports and specificationsthat define 3GPP technologies. page 4 of 13
THBORBTTCAI RF Frpln CnlculnTIONS - GROUXD LBVnr,SMnruoooLocYThese calculations are based on what are called "worst-case" estimates. That is, the estimatesassume 100% use of all transmitters simultaneously. Additionally, the calculations make the assumptionthat the sunounding area is a flat plane, and there is no degradation of signal strength due to the presenceof foliage, building materials, atmospheric conditions, etc. The resultant values are thus conservative inthat they over predict actual resultant power densities'The calculations are based on the following information (See Table 2 datafor T-Mobile and AT&Tcalculations, and Table 3 for hypothetical data representing a "fully loaded" monopole):l. Effective Radiated Power (ERP).2. Antenna height (centerline, above ground level (AGL))'3. Antennavertical energy patterns (See AppendixA); the source of the negative gain (G) values.,,Directional" antennas are designed to focus the RF signal, resulting in 'opattems" of signal lossand gain. Antenna energy patterns display the loss of signal strength relative to the direction ofpropagation due to elevation angle changes. The gain is expressed as "GE".Note: "G" is a unitless factor usually expressed in decibels (dB); where G = 10 (dB/ro)For example: for an antenna gain oi3 dB, the net factor (G) = 10 Qtro) :2F'or an anienna /oss of -3 dB, the net factor (G) : 10 ci/to) : g'5To determine the magnitude of the RF field, the power density (S) from an isotropic RF source iscalculated, making use of the power density formula as outlined in FCC's OET Bulletin 65, Edition97-01 :uiiiS=-N-4'n'NWhere:P -+ Power to antenna (watts)G -+ Gain of antennaR + Distance (range) from antenna source to point ofintersection with the ground (feet)pz : (Heighg2 + (Horizontal distance)2Since: p . G : EIRP (Effective Isotropic Radiated Power) for broadcast antennas, the equation canbe presented in the following form:SEIRP4'n'R2In the situation of off-axis power density calculations, apply the negative elevation gain (G E) valuefrom the vertical energy patterns with the following formula:S= EIRP'Gl4 'n'R2Page 5 of13
Ground reflections may add in-phase with the direct wave, and essentially double the electric fieldintensity. Because power density is proportional to the square of the electric field, the power density mayquadruple, that is, increase by a factor of four (4). Since ERP is routinely used, it is necessary to convertERp into EIRp by multiplying by the factor of 1.64 (the gain of a half-wave dipole relative to an isotropicradiator). Therefore, downrange power density estimates can be calculated by using the formula:S:4'(ERP'1.64)'GE4'n'R2: ERP'64.6rfi.R2.ERP .6EpzTo calculatetheo/o MPE, use the formula:%MPE= -S-' looMPEThe results of the calculations for the potential maximum RF emissions resulting from thesummation of the proposedT-Mobile and AT&T PWS system (See Table 2 inventory) are depicted inFigure 4 as plotted against linear distance from the base of the monopole in any direction' The results ofthe calculations for the potential maximum RF emissions resulting from the summation of the proposedT-Mobile and AT&T pWS plus twofuture hypothetical additional Pll'S caftier's transmitter and antennainstallation (See Table 3 inventory) are similarly depicted in Figure 5. Note that the values have beencalculated for a height of 6' AGL in accordance with regulatory rationale, and assumes all antennas aredirected along the same azimuths.Also depicted on the graphs are values for a height of 16' AGL (height of a typical 2"d story)' Alogarithmic scale was used to plot the calculated theoretical %MPE values in order to compare with theMpE limit values of 100% (public) and 500%o (note that 100% Worker limit : 500o/o Public limit), whichare so much larger that they would be off the page in a linear plot. The curves are variable due to theapplication of the vertical energy pattems (See Appendix A)'OnsBRv.q,rIoNS IN C6NSIDERATI9N yITH FCC Rut Ps $1.1307(n) & 51'1310Will it be physically possible to stand next to or touch any omnidirectional antenna and/or stand infrontof a directional antenno?No; access to the monopole will be restricted, and the site will adhere to RF safety guidelines regardingthe transmitting antennas, including appropriate signage'Page 6 of 13
ANrrxNn INveNroRvTable 2: Proposed and Possible Antenna & Transmitter Inventory120' Monopole at 1044 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MATypical UseTypical Parameters:ERP & Transmit FrequenciesTypical AntennaConfigurationAntennaCenterline(AGL)Proposed by T-MobilePCS/LTE-1900AWS-1700AWS-2100LTE.TOOBack-Haul3156 watts ERP;: 1900 MHz4357 walts ERP; = 1700 MHz3708 watts ERP;= 2rToMHz2507 watts ERP; = 1950 MHz3974 watts ERPx27-31GHzEMS RR 6519Kathrein 742351Kathrein 742351Powerwave77622' MW "Dish"1 15',Proposed by AT&TLTE-7OOUMTS-850AWS-2100PCS/LTE-1900wcs-23001968 watts ERP;= 777 MHz2260watts ERP; = 850 MHz2566 watts ERP; = 2170MHz2625 watts ERP;= 1950 MHz5613 watts2350 MHz80010122OPA-65R-LCUU100'Table Notes:AWS: Advanced Wireless ServicesLTE: Long Term Evolution (a.k.a' "4G")PCS: Personal Communication SystemUMTS: Universal Mobile Telecommunications ServicesWCS: Wireless Communication ServiceTable 3: Hypothetical Antenna & Transmitter Inventory1200 Monopole at 1044 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MATypical UseTypical Parameters:ERP & Transmit FrequenciesTypical AntennaConfigurationAntennaCenterline(AGL)HypotheticalPWS Carriers*700" (LTE)850 "Cellular"AWSPCS-LTE3035 watts ERP;= 750MHz3035 watts ERP;= 850 MHz5049 watts ERP; = 2looMHz4357 watts ERP; = 19oo MHzSBNHH-1D65BLNX-6514DS.A1M85'850 "Cellular"PCS-LTE1200 watts ERP;:850 MHz2720 watts ERP; = 19oo MHzDB93ODD65LNX-6514-DS-VTM70'Page 7 of13
--.16' AGL-dI AGL-l,tr'E (Ihblic)-nfltf, (Srqkr)1m0.00%lffi,filYo%MPE10.00%l.0OVo0.10%50000ltxto2flt03&10,{xloDistrnctftoD Brsc Feetl5.021c*OlVcRBsuIrS OF THEORETICAL RF FININ CUCUINTIONSFigure 4: Theoretical Cumulative Maximum Percent MPE - vs. - Distance(Combined T-Mobile + AT&T RF Contributions)Figure 5: Theoretical Cumulative Maximum Percent MPE - vs. - Distance(Combined RF Contributions Representing a 66Fully Loaded" Monopole)--.16racf,,-6IAGL-IIPE o'!bnc)-!ilrf,(sirlr)r000.0094100.0t)%% ]VIPElo-txll.tlF/o0.10'/o5{Xl00100020003000'1000Distatrcefrcnl Brse lteetl1.694oPage 8 of13
CoNct-ustoxTheoretical RF field calculations data indicate the summation of the proposed T-Mobile andAT&T maximum pWS RF contributions would be within the established RF exposure guidelines; seeFigure 4. The additional calculations also suggest that even if the monopole had two additional PWSprovider,s antennas attached, the site would comply with all established RF exposure guidelines; seeFigure 5.This includes all publicly accessible areas, and the surrounding neighborhood in general' Theresults support compliance with the pertinent sections of the Massachusetts Department of Public Healthregulations regarding PWS facilities, and the FCC's guidelines for RF exposure'The number and duration of calls passing through PWS facilities cannot be accurately predicted.Thus, in order to estimate the highest RF fields possible from operation of these installations, the maximalamount of usage was considered. Even in this so-called "worst-case", the resultant increase in RF fieldlevels are far below established levels considered safe.Based on the results ofthe additional theoretical RF fields I have calculated, it is my expert opinionthat this facility would comply with all regulatory guidelines for RF exposure'Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.Sincerely,Donald L. Haes,Jr.Certified Health PhYsicistNote: The analyses, conclusions and professional opinions are based upon the precise parameters and conditions ofthis particular site; Monopole at 1044Route 2g, South yarmouth, MA. utiiization oftheie analyses,;;;;l*i"". andprofessional opinions for any personal wireless services installation, existingor proposed, other than the aforementioned has not been sanctioned by the author, and therelori should not be accepted as evidence of regulatory compliancePage 9 of 13
Dor,qtn L. HAES, JR., CHP, CLSORadiation SaJbtY SPec ialistPO Box 198, Hampstead, NH 03841 617-680-6262Email : donald_haes-chp@comcast.net12J4SrnrenanNT oF CBRrIntcATloNI certiff to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements of fact contained in this report aretrue and correct.The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions andlimiting conditions, and are personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions and conclusions'I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject ofthis report and I haveno personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved.My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined energy level or directionin-energy level that favors the cauie of the client, the amount of energy level estimate, theattainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event.This assignment was not based on a requested minimum environmental energy level or specificpower density.My compensation is not contingent on an action or event resulting from the analyses, opinions, orconclusions in, or the use of, this report.The consultant has accepted this assessment assignment having the knowledge and experiencenecessary to complete the assignment competently.My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared, in,.onforrity wittr the American Board of Health Physics (ABHP) statements of standards ofprofess ional respons ibil ity for Certifi ed Health Physicists.Date: Seotember 4"2020Ilonald L. Hacs, Jr.Certificd Heatth PhYsicist56.78Page 10 of13
APPENDIX AVertical & Horizontal Energy Patterns80S-960 MHzHorizontal patt€md6o-polarizsllonVerllcal patlem46''pslarizatlon0.5"-12.5o electrlcaldowntilt1710-2180 MHzHorlzontal pattom!45'golarlzatlonVer{cal paltem*45o-polarlzatbno.5o-1 oq €l€drlcsl do|ntlltAnterna Pattern Vev€r| :e:.:::.:-;,+-:r'=:'-t4-:.'. i a| :c.,:r-:rr".t :r-:::af .+-+,:5:r a t+r.: !.: ': :i irf l;Hds: -;i lo oAzimuthElevation: ra,fi L;(r: |n.r.:n clrPage 11 of13
Dotvato L. HAES, JR., CHP, CLSORadi at io n SaJbty Spec i al i s t617 -680-6262PO Box 198,NH 03841Email: donald haesaSUMMARY OF QUALIF'ICATIONSAcademic Training -o Graduated from chelmsford High School, chelmsford, MA;June 1973.o completed NavalNuclear Naval Nuclear Power school, 6-1211976.o Completed Naval Nuclear Reactor Plant Mechanical Operator and Engineering LaboratoryTechnician (ELT) schools and qualifications, Prototype Training Unit, Knolls Atomic PowerLaboratory, Windsor, Connecticut, l-91 1977 .o Graduated Magna Cum Laude from University of Lowell with a Bachelor of Science Degree inRadiological Health Physics; 5 / 1987 .o Graduated from University of Lowell with a Master of Science Degree in Radiological Sciencesand Protection; 5 I 1988.Certification -o Board Certified by the American Board of Heatth Physics 1994; renewed 1998, 2002,2006,2010'2014, and 20 I 8. Expiration 12131 12022.o Board Certified by the Board of Laser Safety 2008; renewed 2011,2014,2017. Expirationt2/3U2020.aaaEmployment History -o Consulting Health Physicist; IonizingA.,lonionizing Radiation, 1988 - present.o Radiation, RF and Laser Safety Officer;BAE Systems,2005-2018 (retired).o Assistant Radiation Safety Officer; MIT, 1988 -2005 (retired).o Radiopharmaceutical Production Supervisor - DuPontA',lEN, 1981 - 1988 (retired).o United States Navy;Nuclear Power Qualifications, 1975 - l98t (Honorably Discharged)Professional Societies -o Health Physics Society [HPS].o American Academy of Health Physics IAAHP]o Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IIEEE];o Intemational Committee on Electromagnetic Safety [CES] (ANSI C95 series).o Laser Institute of America [LIA].o Board of Laser Safety [BLS].o American National Standards Institute Accredited Standards Committee IASC Zl36]o Committee on Man and Radiation [COMAR].Page 12 of13
ENoNorosi. Federal Register, Federal Communications Commission Rules; Radiofrequency radiation,'environmental effects evaluation guidelines Volume 1, No. 153, 41006-41199, August 7,1996' (47 CFRPart 1; Federal Communications Commission).ii. Telecommunications Act of 1996,47 USC; Second Session of the l04sCongress of the United Statesof America, January 3,1996.iri. 195 CMR 122.000: Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Non-Ionizing Radiation Limits for:The General public from Non-Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, Employees fromOccupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, and Exposurefrom Microwave Ovens.iu. IEEE Cgs.l-1g9g: American National Standard, Sof"ty levels with respect to human exposure to radiofrequency electromagneticfields,from 3 kHz to 300 GHz (Updated in2020).u. NationalCouncil on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP); Biological Efficts and ExposureCriteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic F iel ds, NCRP Report 86, I 986.ui. Federal Register, Federal Communications Commission Rules; Vol. 85, No. 63 / Wednesday, April l,2020 /Rules and Regulations 18145.uii. Jamshed, Muhammad Ali (Institute of Communication Systems (ICS), Home of 5G Innovation entre(5GIC), University of Surrey, Guildford GUz 7XH, U.K). Electro-magnetic field exposurereduction/avoidance for the next generations of wireless communication systems. IEEE Journal ofElectromagnetics, RF, And Microwaves in Medicine and Biology, Vol' 4, No' 1, March 2020'vlii. gB1 Bulletin 65: Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology,Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrecluency ElectromagneticFields; Edition 97-01, August 1999.Page 13 of13
16
PreTerraTo:DESIGN GBOUP, LLCSean GormleY, Program ManagerBlue Sky Towers lll, LLCProTerra Design GrouP, LLCJanuary 10,2022lncorporated Stormwater Standards for Proposed Gell TowerMashpee Fire Station #2(MA'51121101 Red Brook RoadMashpee, MA 02649FromDate:Re:Per discussions between Blue Sky Towers lll, LLC and ProTerra Design Group' LLC (ProTerra)'this memo was prepared to outline stormwater standards incorporated into the new towerlocation site design.The original site desig n in 2017 incorporated a stormwater treatment system requiring theclearing of additional trees for the treatment area. During the review process' the Cape Codcommission and Town of Mashpee staff requested that ProTerra remove the stormwaterfacilities due to the sandy nature of the surrounding soils and to eliminate clearing treesunnecessarily. At that time, Town of Mashpee Staff also requested that the site designincorporate a few smaller stormwater features to disperse runoff prior to treatment through theexisting vegetated and wooded areas. All parties agreed to wrap the site with a 12" wide peagravel diaphragm.Based on similar soil conditions at the new tower site and the previous Town of Mashpee staffdiscussions, proTerra followed a comparable design principle for dispersing stormwater at thenew tower and driveway locations. Pea gravel diaphragms are included on the downhill sides ofthe compound and driveway. A small stone level spreader is proposed at the low point near thedriveway entrance along Red Brook Road. These drainage features will direct stormwaterrunoff generated from the tower compound and driveway into the adjoining natural vegetatedfilter strips for treatment.lf you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to call us at (413)320-4918.ProTerra Design GrouP, LLC4 Boy Rood, Building A, Suite 200Hodley, MA 01.035Ph:(41'3)320-a918E : i nfo @ P rote r ra -d e si g n. co m
17
Pro'IerraDESIGN GROUP. LLCBoy Roodtulte 2OOMA 01035Building AiPh: (415)J2o-49r8CONSULIANISTSTAMP:Jesset?/FOR SCHEMA|IC ONLYDATE: 12//28/2022CHECK: JMM/TEJscALEi sEE PLANSIGITT I,INEPROFITTSzoaUEJFF=mlEocf6q=E&oolqoE!Ft:qooz"loEEEiLilslHEt'Otsb1HHHEBEEo>J;d" Hpel tget oJOB NO; 17-056SL.1SHEEr ilILErDRAWN: BLM452502500DD75PONDDRIVE25-o+500+001 +002+OOJ+003+50SIGHTPROFILE #1SCALEHORIZNTALSCALE (11x17)r 1'=80' HORIZoNTAL1'=E0'VERTICAL1"=40'VERTICAL50cC25007552ts-0+ 500+001 +OO2+003+003+50oBBSIGHT LINE PI.ANSIGHT LINE PROFILE #2SCALET 1"=100'1"=2O0'(2h3a)(1 1xl7)ScALt (22x54)r 1"=4o' HoRIZoNTAL1"=40'veRlCALSCALE1r11"=80'1"=80'HORIZONTALVERTICAL155012IJNoTES,/REFERENcES:1. PROPERTY LINE AND EXISTING FEATURES _ SEE SHEET C_1 PREPAREDBY NORTHEAST SURVEY CONSULTANTS, DATED AUGUST 7, 2020.2. TOPOGRAPHY FROM LIDAR DATA PREPARED BY USGS COASTAL ANDMARINE GEOLOGY PROGRAM RETRIEVED FROM THE NOAA DATA ACCESSVIEWER.o. 2013-2014 USGS CMGP LIDAR: POST SANDY (MA, NH, Rl)J. THE FOLLOWNG DATALAYERS PREPARED BY OFFICE OF GEOGRAPHICINFoRMATION (MASSGIS), COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS' MASSIT:o. 2021 AERIAL IMAGERY. USED TO DETERMINE EXISTING TREE LINES4. TREE CANOPY HEIGHT PROVIDED BY VIRTUAL SITE SIMULATIONS, LLCwI"THIN "TREE HEIGHT ANALYSIS PACKAGE,, DATED MARCH 15, 2022(TREE HEIGHTS FROM LIDAR SOURCES).5, SITE LINE REPLICATIONS ARE FROM COMPILED SOURCES AND ARECONSIDERED SCHEMATICS'IO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH BALLOONFLOAT & SITE SIMULATIONS.6. TOP OF TOWER IS 119,6'T ABOVE GRADE FROM THE ASSUMED STREETELEVATTON 9' NAVD88 (RouTE 28),005051 +OO2+OOJ+50l:SIGHT LINEscALE (22x34): 1"=40' HORIZONTAL1"-40'VERTICALHORIZilTAL2J45IE) RoADWAYI -I+IJ50'lll[To\4ER CENTER TO APPROX,ijl1-ILOCUSa_foo).JIcANoPY -35.0'*(-TOPAGL)TREE(E)It_ffiE#,,str"w-fr;f*dd,gsffia\rtt.fAPPROX, '-(E) CRADEIt-L-T- :::loooicoriqNN@@N@@o3q;NDq.inNri-1ios'+ '_ ITOWER CENTER TO APPROX. (E) CHURCH:-rttll:FI50-US-89.'1CHURCHTOP (E) TREE CANOPYAPPROX.ett- APPROX./ {e) ccnor&x{rlOzzrElIIFIo--I__ tl_rL-:::-f[_looNoooooN"looN.oC-oooo@oi@o;i*lqSL_1223'+'IrowEi crlrEi ro lPi'nox.([) sotTH BoUND LANE RoADWAY] -rttlToP (E)(AGL)TREECANOPYOot89,wROU28FOREST ROADPARCI50-11F-*lll- APPROX./ {r) cenor*ozzUFEl0ItsIo=ilL-ILC::t:Jt_LN1ooooorjoncio@oio;!'].l\ori9SL_1-0+500+00SCALEI"=EO,VERTICAL3+00HORIZONTAL
ProTerraDESIGN GROUN LLCBullding AiHodley,Boy RoodSuite 200MA 01055Phr (413)J20- aslsCONSUL IAN ISiSTAMP:FOR SCHEMATIC ONLYDATE: 12/26,/2022CHECK: JMM/TEJSCALEj SEE PLANSrcI{T UNEPROFILESzoaE=UgEooUlaqFF=@lEool9.lt!)iEloozoEiEiH:EEolHHHeHEEEEEo>Jfi=., Hpel ;5&l oJOB NOj 17-056SL.2SHEET TITLE:DRAWN: BLM3455012107aq00DD52ri-o+500+001+ 002+OO3+005+50SIGHT LINE PROFILE #4ScALt (22x54): 1"=40' HoRIZilTAL1"=40'VERTICALSCALEHORIZONTAL1"=E0'VERIICAL502500cC12107No-o+500+001+ 0O2+ 003+003+50BBoSIGHT LINE PLANscALEr 1'-100'(22x54)1"-2oo'(11x17)SIGHT LINE PROFILE #5sceu 1zz*e1. L=lo' rcnrzoNrar scalE (11x17): 1"=80' HoRIZoNTAL \ Sf-Z ,/1"=40'vERlcAL r'=60 vERTrcAL \_-,,'i 550tl2500PARKINC LOT50521+ 0O2+003+50Iljt"SIGHT LINE PROFILE #6ScALE (22'34): l'=40' HoRIZoNTAL1'-4O'VERTICAL25PAI:FIII*- PARCEL50-184,1,IroP (E)1CANOPYICENTER TO(E) ROADWAmtLOTGRADE(E) TREE CANOPY(AGL)5^-ffi"URCHMAdozzFEfdctsIo=atIr_LffNcitsoN6rj9odFq;oidnoi6iDOIE) ROADWAY]llll- 226'* [TowER CENTER To APPRox.-rrtll-18650-US-89.1fooIIss.ot* (nclj lppnox.TOP (E) TREE CANOPYrtl#4w-IRz,. :IROUTE 28--t-3I'i&#ffII_ozzF_-cioaFCFIII-!J::_JI-:-. l:oqNdi@d3ri68roi@f;troNoooN3rrio3.r\joNoi\\Itlt- 325'* [ToweR CENTER ToIAPPROX,Iinuc'lunr1 -E) RESIDENTIAL SttPARCELL49650-1ITOP (E) TREE CANOPYIAPPROX,89.30.TOPI(AGL)TREECANOPYw7,:-s*tPARKINGLOTl*ffIozzrE)IIFUIo=wlt!II_I_tL- --l;s" - APPROX.-f-(r) cnnort)__Iri:::Tortc.iNoNN^ic6iol:EcD;;o-o+ 500+004scALE (uxr7): 1"=80' HoRrzoNrAL \ sr,-z ,/t"=So vERTtcAL \_-./3+00HORIZONTAL
.lProTerraDESIGN GROUP. LLGBulldlng A;HodlerBoy RoodSite 200MA 01035Phr (413)520-4918CONSUL IAN ISISTAMP:FOR SCHEMATIC ONLYDATE: 12/2E/2O22CHECK: JMM/TEJSCALET SEE PLANSrcEI I,INEPROFILESnzo6x=Uu&eooUlaFF=mlEoolEI4lqlFoUilo7c-lEEEHrJlst6sTgAs$utsHttHHo=oEIJJ=oYv,IIJH]el E*tqtFEHE>ERHhErdR$SL.3SHETT flTLE:DRAWN: BLMJOB NO.: 17-05652502500DD755CHURCHPARKING LOT2oo-0+ 500+001 +002+005+005+50sGHT LINE PROFILE #7SCALE40 HoRIZNTAL SCALE (11x17): 1HORIZONTAL1"=40'VERTICAL1"=60'vERTICAL'1 550cC12250050CHURCHPARKING LOT5-o+ 500+001 +002+OO3+003+50BBo*:+ffiSIGHT LINE PROFILE #8ScaLE (22,34)lHORIZONTALScaLE (11xl7): 1"=80' HoRIzoNTAL1"=80'vERIICALl"=40'vERTICAL5012251000150APPROX. (E)RESIDENTIALSTRUCTURECHURCHPARKING LOT5A1 +002+OOJ:SIGHT LINEOFILE #9scALE (22x5a): 1"=4o' HoRtzdTAL SCALE 01x]7): 1::=80' HoRIZNTAL' 1"=40' VERTTCAL r"=8O' VERIICAL24t>lllllllr_ 249,+ ITOWER CENTER TO APPROX. (E) RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE.-llrrtlllFIPAR50-191IfooIIIIr APPROX. (E)-\--nrsroe rtrlL\ srnuctuRrj-r- Ia&=-t+5'oL-L,|GRADETOP (E) TREE CANOPYo'i (a_t_tc1 :odriocirt@NdorioNEN-3srt.l*=lo___--|-____T-_fl|.|lll- zeq'* lrowrn crNrrn ro nppnox. (E) RESIDENTIAL STRUCTUREI -tlrltllllPARCFIPAR(:I50-19150-1 9,IIIloJIII-nppnox. (r)-RESIDEN'IIALSTRUCTUREr,^-JffitAPPROX.(E) GRADEITOP (E) TREE CANOPYAPPROX,zHtlIc;l'IaL;_t_L_E-..:d@do@doE.tpl,qein)'-4rjNNoiq.r*]r* -,o lrroo*.'(.) *r3,orr'ol srnuCrueel -- 331ll'r IrowER+:EL92PIRCEL-lq1PARCEL Tsorq I iril,)OoI{.JSHEDGRADETREE CANOPY1TOPFaffi-IIILL_IC:=::lNNrNdoodNrtIN.riN3n.irt)t:No_3q-o+500+005+003+50HORIZONTAL
tProTerraDESIGN GROUP. LLCEuildinq A;HodlenBoy Roodtulte 2O0MA 01035Ph: (413)320-491ECONSULIANISiSTAMP:FOR SCHEMA"IIC ONLYDATE: 12/28//2022CHECK: JMM/"TFJSCALE: SEE PLANSIGIff UNEPROFILESzoUtl== lt:ul>>lmul-pkol"rl:\lvodaF=cGFooz"loEiEiHla}H8\'AEh1HHEEEEEo>Jiff=. Hpel tHsl oJOB NO.: 17-056SL.4SHEET N'TLE:DRAWN: BLM2J5DD125000107CC5no;-0+ 500+001 +002+005+003+50NE PROFILE #1OSCALEHoRtzoNTAL scALE(t1117):HORIZNTAL1"=40'VERTICALl"=a0'VERTICAL5012z300BBoffi+ffi75PONDDRIVE2ool:02040-o+ 500+001 +002+00J+003+ 50SIGHTPROFILE #11scALE (22x34):HoRTzoNTAL scALE (llxl7)r l"=a0' HoRIZNTALvERTtcaL 1"=8O' VERTICALJ42I,+I277IITOWER.,o Jrr*o*.11r1 *rrlor*r,oJ ,r*r.lr*.1 -5U-1 9 IrTOP (E) TREE CANOPYo'+),(E)TIALSIDENF1cwccFUIosra-^"lf#/ (r) cnnoEL)_-ICI:d@o;ooNociNooNooNri!r3q.t*ln-t-riPAF261'*.,o*r* 'aarrr*'ro o""hor. 1trtlRESIDENTIAL50-1 90rnpphox. (r)/ RESTDENTTAL/ srnucrunr.89.IAPPROX.CANOPYTtiorl,L.o'*roP (E))-ooJIIIwI,ffiffiffiFrsa'zF{5irr IFI#*)v'eiI_l--t- orrJo*.l1r; cnnoe -,, _L- -I-tr:::51o€ooioo;qtsNNNNo@jn3c!iN.ie6+-i+FnciHORIZONTAL
18
,'-- lri5;;$ST ManagementThis letter of authorization dated -{OuU of kf nrh*r. 2020, provides written authorization forBlue sky Towers lll, LLc, its attorneys, other agents or representatives, to apply for any necessary zoningpetitions, permits or any other apprcvals, including, but not limited to the filing of a building permitapplication (after required zoning approval has been completed, if necessary) which are necessaryforthe placement of a wireless communicatlons facility with a portion of Map s0 Lot Lgg,i., cornmonlykncwn as (street addressi 1044 Route 28, commonwealth of Massachusetts, county of Barnstable.Town of yarmouth,Letter of AuthorizationThis Letter of Authorization shall not constitute an agr€ement to enter lnto a binding Egreement andneitherpartyshall be bound with regardtothe leasingor purchase of the above rnentiorred propertyuntil a final agreement has become furry executed between the par-ties.Currenl owner of propertylBy;Prlnt Name:Title:Date:Park PIarc l/rhst , 3S2 park Str:eet" Suite ).06 . N<xth Reading" MA 0l g$4Or BS8-960_79F9 . B:866_20T_3+31