HomeMy WebLinkAbout5005 1044 Route 28 Application MaterialsAPPLICATION FORF'ORMAL DESIGN REVIEWBlue Sky Towers III' LLC'a Delaware limited tiability company'd/b/a BSTMA' LLCc/o Ricardo M. Sousa, Esq.Prince Lobel TYe LLPOne International Place, Suite 3700Boston, MA 02110ApplicantProperty Location:1044 Route 28Yarmouth, MA 02664Assessor's Map 50, Lot 189.1Prepared by:Ricardo M. Sousa, Esq.Prince Lobel Tye LLPOne International Place, Suite 3700Boston, MA 02110Telephone : (617) 456'8123Facsimile: (617)456-8100December 30r2022
TABLE OF CONTENTSAPPLICATION FORFORMAL DESIGN REVIEWProperty located at:1044 Route 28Yarmouth,M.A02664Assessor's MaP 50, Lot 189.1Cover LetterSpecial Permit ApplicationSupporting StatementRequest for Waiver of Certain Submittal RequirementsPlansExisting and ProPosed CoverageRF Plots AT&TRF Plots T-MobilePhoto SimulationsDevelopment of Regional Impact DecisionDesign Review CommentsSite Plan Review CommentsSite Plan Review Applicant Responses to CommentsAlternative Site AnalYsisEnvironmental Sound AssessmentRF Study/EME RePortTabl'Tab2Tab 3Tab 4Tab 5Tab 6TabTTab 8Tab 9Tab 10Tab 11Tab 12Tab 13Tab 14Tab 15
Drainage MemoSight Line PlanAuthorization LetterTab 16Tab 17Tab 18
1
X PRINCE LOBCLDecember 30,2022VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL & FEDERAL EXPRESS DELIVERYTown of Yarmouth,ZoningBoard of AppealYarmouth Town Hall1146, Route 28Yarmouth, MA 02664Re:Property AddressApplication for Special Permit1044 Route 28, Yarmouth, MA 02664Assessor's Map 50, Lot 189.1 (the "Property")Blue Sky Towers III, LLCd/b/a BSTMA III, LLC ("Blue Sky" or the "Applicant")Applicant:Dear Honorable Members of the ZoningBoard of Appeal:Enclosed, please find the following documents and supporting materials regarding Blue SkyTowers Itt, LLC's ("Blue Sky") application requesting a Special Permit the Zoning Board ofAppeal forthe Town of yarmouttr (tne "Board;) for a proposed wireless communications facilitytobe locat ed at 1044 Route 28, Yarmouth, MA 02665, as further detailed herein. Blue Sky hascompleted both the design review and site plan review process' respectively'On behalf of Blue Sky, we appreciate your consideration. Should any member of theBoard have questions or should this application require additional information ormaterials please do not hesitate to contact me.Sincerely,K,r-"ft'-Ricardo M. Sousa, Esq.Prince Lobel Tye LLPOne International Place, 3700Boston, MA 02110Direct: 617-456-8123Email : rsousa@princelobel. comPRINCE LOBEL TYE LLPOne lnternational Place, Suite 3700, Boston, MA 02110Office (617)456-8000 Fax (617) 4s6-8100www.princelobel.comEnclosures
2
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HEARING APPLICATION (APPCAI INfOTMAtiON)Appeal#Hearing DateFee $Applicant is the (check one): owne Tenant Prospective Buyer- other Interested Party-Applicant (full names, including dlbla). Blue Sky Towers lll, LLC d/b/a BSTMA' LLCc/o Ricardo M. Sousa, Esq., Prince Lobel Tye' LLCOne lnternational Place, Suite 3700, Boston, MA 021 10Address:phone: (617)456-8123Email:rsousa@princelobel.comThis application relates to the property located at:AttorneyShown on the Assessor's MaP as:#50MapParcel #: 189.1(82); Hotel/MotelOverlay District 1 (HMOD1); Village CenterOverlay District (VC3)ZoningDistrict: Businessproperty located on un-constructed (paper) street? Provide nearest cross street name or other identifying location:aaaProject Summary (this information is used for the(e.g., add a 10' by 15' deck to the front of our house).Legal Notice in the newspaper): Applicant seeks permission toApplicant seeks permission to construct a monopole communicationstower as further details hereinRELIEF REQUESTED: The aPPlicantseeks the following relief from the Zoning Board of Appeals:Permit pursuant to Section 103.2.2and Section 408. of the Town's Zoning Bylaws.Applicant seeks a SpecialREVERSEdecision with thisapplication). What is the decision date?:The reason for reversal and the ruling you requestthe Board to make:BUILDING INSPECTOR ORZONING ADMINISTRATOR DECISION (include a coPY of thisX SPECIAL PERMIT underand/or for a use authorized uPonYarmouth ZoningBYJaw Section:Special Permit in the "Use Regulation Schedule" $202.5and Reliqious lnstitutionCommunications FacilitYVARIANCE from the Yarmouth ZoningBy-law. Specify all sections of the by-lawfrom which relief is requested,and, as to each section, specify the reliefsought:Section & Relief sought:Section & Relief sought:Section & Relief sought:ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (which you feel should be included in your application):Please see suPPlementalmaterials attached hereto.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HEARING APPLICATION (Property Information)Name & Address of Current Property Owner (if other than applicant) as listed on the Deed:Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall River, 1044 Route 28, Yarmouth, MA 02664Title Deed Reference (provide a copy of most recent Deed):. Book &Page#:Book 869;Paqe 144. or Certificate #:. Land Court Lot #:o Plan #:-Use Classification:r Existing: _5202.5#P2 Re lnstitutionaProposed:s202.) F F/ Uommuications FacilitvIs the property vacant?: Yes_ No X Ifyes, how long has property been vacant?Lot InformationSize/Area: +l-4.4 acresaaaPlan Book &Page:Book 669;Paae 144Lot #: '189.1Is this property within the Aquifer Protection Overlay District (APDX Yes- No-X-Have you completed a formal commercial site plan review (if needed)? Yes X No-Which other Boards and/or Town Departmentsarelhaveiwill review this project? What is the status of review?Applicant has underqone Formal Design Review with the DesignReview Committee and Site Plan Review with thePlanninq BoardIs this a repetitive petition (re-application)? Yes-_ No XIf required, do you have Planning Board Approval? Yes,x- No-Has this property been the subject of prior relief from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes- No-If yes, proviOe the date(s), Appeal number(s), decision(s), and other pertinent information with this application.N/A-Noozonino relief oranted refn the Annlicant'snr nrnnosed ttseBuilding Commissioner Comments :Property Owner Signature:Applicant / Attorney / Agent Signature:'fu*7;/-*AddressPhoneEmailBuilding Commissioner Signature: Date:
3
X PRINCE LOBCLDecember 30,2022{VIA HAND DELIVERYITown of Yarmouth,ZoningBoard of AppealYarmouth Town Hall1146 Route 28Yarmouth, MA 02664RE:Property Address:Application for Special Permit1044 Route 28, Yarmouth, MA 02664Assessor's Map 50, Lot 189.1 (the "Property")Blue Sky Towers III, LLC,d/b/a BSTMA III, LLC ("Blue Sky" or the "Applicant")Applicant:Dear Honorable Members of the ZoningBoard of Appeal:This firm represents the Applicant in connection with an application for a special permit(the "special Permit") from the ZoningBoard of Appeal (the "Board") for the Town ofYarmouth (the "Town") in connection with the Applicant's proposed wirelesstelecommunications facility tower at the Property pursuant to the relevant portions of the Town'sZoningBylaw (the "Bylaw"). Blue Sky proposes to construct a one hundred and ten foot(110.0b') high stealth itye Communication Towerl (the "Tower"). The Applicant has enteredinto lease agreements with AT&T and T-Mobile whereupon completion of the construction ofthe Tower, afS.f and T-Mobile will install their respective antennas on the Tower as well asinstall appurtenant equipment at the base of the Tower for the operation of a Personal WirelessService Fa cility2 (the "Facility"). The Facility will be surrounded by a six foot (6.00') highstockade fence, and will also be surrounded by a natural barrier of screening trees. The FacilityI Under the Town of Yarmouth ZoningBylaw, Section V, a'oCommunication Tower" is defined as "[a]ny building'structure, pole, mast, tripod, monopole, or tower, free-standing or supported, or in association with a building orother permanent structure or equipment, utilized for the generating, transmitting, receiving, or detecting ofelectromagnetic radiation."2 Under the Town of Yarmouth ZoningBylaw, Section V, a'oPersonal Wireless Service Facility" is defined as "[a]communications facility for the provision of personal wireless services, as defined by the Telecommunications Actof 1996." Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Section 70a(a)(7)(C)(ii), "the term 'personal wirelessservice facilities' means facilities for the provision of personal wireless seryices." Moreover, under theTelecommunications of 1996, Section 70a(aX7)(C)(i), "the term opersonal wireless seryices' means commercialmobile services, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services'"
X PRINCE LOBELis described in greater detail on the plans submitted with this application, and incorporated hereinby reference (the "Plans").The Property is owned by the Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall River and located in theBusiness BZ (*p;2'), Hotel/Motel Overlay District 2 ("HMOD2"), and the Village CentersOverlay District 3 (*VCa";. Pursuant to Section 408.5 of the Town of Yarmouth ZoningBylaw(the "Bylaw"), all new Towers and Facilities in the Town require a Special Permit. AT&T andi-trrtoUit" cannot provide reliable wireless service to the Town based on their existing Facilitieswithin the Town, pursuant to the mandate of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and theirlicenses issued Uy ttre Federal Communications Commission (the "FCC"). Therefore, theApplicant r"rp""ifully requests that this Board grant approval for the requested Special Permit asapplication described herein.By way of further background, the Applicant was granted Development of RegionalImpact approvat by the Cape Cod Commission on January 13,2022, and the written decisionregardingih" rum" is attac-hed hereto as Exhibit 10. The Applicant subsequently filed anapptication for formal design review by the Town's Design Review Committee on June 14,iOZZ,resulting in the Design Review Comment Sheet attached hereto as Exhibit 11 and filed anapplication foisite plan review with the Town's Site Plan Review Committee and received theSiG ptan Review Comment Sheet dated July 19, 2022,which is attached hereto as Exhibit 12'I. BackgroundBlue Sky is in the business of constructing and opening communication towers in variousmarkets throughout the country, including the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Thecommunication towers are utilized by wiieless carriers that are licensed by the FCC. AT&T andT-Mobile are licensed by the FCC to construct and operate wireless telecommunicationsnetworks in various m*k"ts throughout the country, including the Commonwealth ofMassachusetts and in particular the Town of Yarmouth. AT&T and T-Mobile are in the processof opening their telecommunications networks to provide seamless and reliable coveragethroughout the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.II. Radio Frequencv CoverageAT&T and T-Mobile have performed a study of radio frequency coverage for the Townand from the property, AT&T and T-Mobile have determined that atelecommunications facilitylocated at the Property will provide necessary, adequate and reliable coverage to the targetedsections of the TownLnd the immediately surroundingareain AT&T and T-Mobile's proposedantennas are located at the requested height of ninety five feet (95.00') and one hundred and fivefeet (105.00'), respectively. In connection herewith, AT&T and T-Mobile have submitted radiofrequency p.opugation maps showing each camera's current coverage and showing theanticipated coverage from the proposed Facility.
X PRINCC LOBELIII. The Tower and FaciliWAs illustrated on the Plans, the Tower will be one hundred and ten feet (110.00') in height(the roof will extend to 115') and will be located within the 55' x 60' fenced compound withinthe 100' x 100' lease area. fenced compound lease area. The Tower has been designed as a clocktower for aesthetic purposes and this design will entirely conceal the various equipment andantennas. Within the fenced compound lease area, the Facility is surrounded by a tree line ofscreening trees which will be supplemental by additional landscaping trees as detailed in theplans. A=T&T'5 panel antennas are proposed to be installed at a height of ninety five feet (95.00'centerline), and i-Mobile's panel antennas are proposed to be installed at a height of onehundred and five feet (105.00' centerline), with both AT&T and T-Mobile's appurtenanttelecommunications equipment to be located within the fenced compound. The antennas will beconnected via coaxial cables installed with AT&T and T-Mobile's respective appurtenantequipment at the base of the Tower. The Tower provides for collocation opportunities for two() other FCC licensed carriers at centerline heights of seventy four feet (69.00') and eighty fouri"rt (3S.OO'). Under current FCC regulations, the antennas are required to be separated by aminimum of three feet (3.00'), and the antenna installations are required to maintain 10' ofvertical separation between installations.IV. Lesal ArsumentThe Applicant is entitled to the grant of the Special Permit because the Applicant'sproposed Facility complies with the criteria of Section 103'2.2 of the Bylaw:a) Section 103.2. Special Permits.1. 103.2.2. Criteria. Special permits shall not be granted unless the applicantdemonstrates that no undue nuisanceo hazard or congestion will be createdand that there will be no substantial harm to the established or futurecharacter of the neighborhood or town.In addition, individual sections of theZoningBylaw contain supplemental special permit criteria for specific usesand types of develoPment.The Proposed Tower will provide critical wireless telecommunication coverage tothe Town while in no way creating an undue nuisance, hazard or congestion' TheApplicant has proposed a stealth design in the form of a clock tower to concealthe equipment and antennas and as a result, there will be no substantial harm tothe character of the neighborhood or Town. As fuither detailed herein, theApplicant and the Proposal meet the various requirements of the Bylaw and willpr*ia. benefits to the residents and businesses in Town in the form of improvedand reliable wireless coverage, including improved E. 911 capabilities.The Applicant is entitled to the grant of the Special Permit because the Applicant'sproposed Facility complies the intent of Section 408.4.1. of the Bylaw:
X PRINCC LOBCLa) Section 408.4.1.1. The Board of Appeals may alter or waive one or more of the requirements ofsection 408 if it finds that the alteration or waiver of the requirement(s) willnot derogate from the intent of the bylaw.The waivers requested by the Applicant as more fully detailed in the waiverrequest attached hereto which are administrative in nature and if granted will notdeiogate from the intent of the Bylaw but instead will ensure the same can beadhered to without undue expense to the Applicant and the Town.The Applicant is entitled to the grant of the Special Permit because the Applicant'sproposed Facility complies with the application filing requirements pursuant to Section408.6.2.5. of the Bylaw:a) Section 408.6.2, Location Filing Requirements.1. 408.6.2.5. If the application is for a Personal Wireless Service Facility a town-widemap showing other existing Personal Wireless Service Facility in the Town andoutside the Town within one mile of its corporate limits'The Applicant shall be in compliance with this provision of the Bylaw as evidenced by Exhibit 6attached hereto.The Applicant is entitled to the grant of the Special Permit because the Applicant'sproposed Facility complies the Design Requirements of Section 408.7 of the Bylaw:a) Section 408.7. Design.l. 408,7.1. General. All Communications Facilities shall be designedand sited so as to have the least adverse visual effect on theenvironment. only self-supporting monopole type towers arepermissible. Lattice towerso or the use of ground anchors and/or guywires, are prohibited.All towers and antennas must meet or exceed current standards andregulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other agency of thefederalo state, and county government with the authority to regulatetowers and antennas. If such standards and regulations are changed,then the owners of the towers and/or antennas governed by thisordinance shatl bring such towers and/or antennas into compliancewith such revised standard and regulations within six (6) months ofthe effective date of such standards and regulations unless a morestringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling federal
X PRINCE LOBCLagency. Failure to bring towers and/or antennas into compliancewith such revised standards and regulations shall constitute groundsfor the removal of the tower or antenna at the ownerts expense.The Applicant's proposed Facility shall be in compliance with this provision of theBylaw. As described in more detail in the Plans and the resulting photo simulations, theApplicant is proposing a stealth tower in the form of a clock tower. This design was developedthroughout the rownt design review and site plan review process. The design originally startedu, u *orropole style tower and through design review, developed to a stealth style clock tower tominimize visual impacts. Furthermore, both the Applicant and the wireless carriers installed andoperating on the Tower will fully comply with all applicable FCC and FAA regulations.2. 408.7.2. Location. No communications Facilityo antenna, or towermay be located in the Town of Yarmouth except as noted in thisbylaw.The Applicant's proposed Facility shall be in compliance with this provision of theBylaw.3. 408.7.2.1. Allowed Areas.a) 1.. The siting of Personal wireless service Facilities shall beallowed in any zoning districto but is especially encouraged onexisting structures, where appropriate, and on sites shown on amap entitled "Town of Yarmouth Inventory of ExistingAntennas Sites and Possible Antenna Sitesro' as currentlyamended. This may be amended by Town Meeting action'As indicated and described in more detail in the Alternative Site Analysis and theSupplemental Alternative Site Analysis packages attached with this application, AT&T and T-frnoUite were unable to find an existing structure that would close the significant gap in wirelesscoverage. As a result, it was necessary to find, a"taw land" to site and construct a tower in orderto clos! the gap in coverage identified by both AT&T and T-Mobile. Upon careful analysis ofthe land in the Town, and keeping in mind the provisions of the Bylaw, the Property was the onlyidentified commercially or institutionally used lot in the area that contained sufficient land area,satisfied lot coverage requirement, offered a vegetative screening and otherwise satisfied thecriteria listed in thJAlternative Site Analysis package. Therefore, the Property is the onlyfeasible location for the proposed Facility because it is capable of supporting the necessaryfacilities to close AT&T and T-Mobile's significant gap in coverage.b) 2. Communication antennas, buildings, or towers other thanthose for Personal wireless Service Facilities (i.e., those notdefined in the Telecommunications Act of 1996) shall beallowedo by Special Permit, only on sites shown on a map
X PRINCE LOBELentitled.,Town of Yarmouth Inventory of Existing AntennaSites and Possible Antenna Sitesr" as currently amended'As indicated on the Alternative Site Analysis and the Supplemental Alternative siteAnalysis packages submitted and attached to this application, the Applicantanalyzed potentialsites within the.,Town of yarmouth Inventory of Existing Antenna Sites and Possible AntennaSites', for siting of its proposed Facility. The Property was determined to be the most suitableand only feasidle localion for the proposed Facility that would successfully close the gap inwireless telecommunications services coverage.4. 408.7.3. Co-location. If feasible and appropriate, Personal WirelessService Facilities shall be located on existing structures, including butnot limited to buildingso water towers, existing communicationsFacilities, utility poles and towers, and related facilities, providedthat such installation preserves the character and integrity of thosestructures. In particular, applicants are urged to consider use ofexisting telephone and electric utility structures as sites for one ormore Personal Wireless Service Facilities. The applicant shall havethe burden of providing there are no existing structures upon whichit is feasible to locate.As indicated above and as described in the Alternative Site Analysis and theSupplemental Alternative Site Analysis packages submitted herewith, the Applicant studied,"u"rut properties throughout the Town io determine the best siting location for its proposedFacility. Based on the "rit"riu presented and described in the Alternative Site Analysis, it wasdetermined that the property was the most suitable and only feasible location and that siting theproposed Facility at the property would successfully close AT&T's and T-Mobile significant gapin "orr.rug". As such, the Applicant has satisfied its burden for providing evidence that there areno existing structures withinthe Town upon which are feasible for the Applicant to co-locate itsproposed Facility.5. 408.7.3.1. Licensed carriers shall share Personal Wireless ServiceFacilities and sites where feasible and appropriateo thereby reducingthe number of Personal Wireless Service Facilities that are stand-alone facilities. All applicants shall demonstrate a reasonable goodfaith effort to co-locate with other carriers. Such reasonable goodfaith effort includes: 1. A survey of existing structures that may befeasible sites for co-locating Personal Wireless Service facilities; 2.Contact with all the other licensed carriers for commercial mobileradio services operating in the County, and; 3. Sharing informationnecessary to determine if co-location is feasible under the designconfiguration most accommodating to co-location'As previously stated, the Applicant has demonstrated a reasonable good faith effort to co-locate its pioposed Facility based otr it. Altemative Site Analysis and Supplement Altemative
X PRINCC LOBELSite Analysis submitted herewith. The Applicant's proposed Facility has potential to co-locateantenna installations for two (2) additional wireless telecommunications carriers, as shown onthe plans. As such, the Applicant's proposed Facility demonstrates that it has the feasibility toreduce the number of singl--standing Personal Wireless Service Facilities to be developed in theTown by allowing co-location of additional carriers on its Facility.6. 408,7.3.2. In the event that co-location is found to be not feasible, awritten statement of the reasons for the infeasibility shall besubmitted to the Board of Appeals. The Board of Appeals mayretain a technical expert in the field of RF engineering to verify if co-location at the site is not feasible or is feasible given the designconfiguration most accommodating to co-location. The cost for sucha technical expert witl be at the expense of the applicant. The Boardof Appeals may deny a special Permit to an applicant that has notdemonstrated a reasonable good faith effort to provide for co-location.The Applicant has complied with this provision of the Bylaw through its submission ofits Alternative Site Analysis and Supplemental Alternative Site Analysis, and has demonstratedthat it made a good faith effort to study, analyze, and find existing Personal WirelessTelecommunications Facilities within the Town to co-locate on. The Applicant further herebyagrees to comply with the Board of Appeals through submission of its special permit applicationifadditional information is needed, including, the supply of such information to a technicalexpert hired by the Town. The Applicant Further states the proposal was reviewed by a technicalexpert (Isotrope) during the DRI application process before the Cape Cod Commission.7. 408.7.3.3. If the applicant does not intend to co-locate or to permitco-location, the Board of Appeals shall request drawings and studies,at the applicant's expense, which shown the ultimate appearance andoperation of the Personal Wireless Service Facility at full build-out.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility. TheApplicant is already planning for the co-location of AT&T's and T-Mobile's equipment at thefacitity, and the proposed Facility has the capacity to co-locate equipment for an additional two(2) wireless telecommunications carriers.8. 408.7.4. Historic Buildings and Districts.a) 1. Any Personal Wireless Service Facilities located on orwithin an historic structure shall not alter the character-defining features, distinctive construction methods, or originalhistoric materials of the building.
X PRINCC LOBELThis provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility. To theextent that the Board finds this provision applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility, theApplicant hereby agrees thatit shall comply with this provision of the Bylaw.b) 2. Any alteration made to an historic structure toaccommodate a Communications Facility shall be fullyreversible.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.c) 3. Personal Wireless Service Facilities within the Old King'sHighway Regional Historic District shall be concealed withinor behind existing architectural features, or shall be located sothat they are not discernable from public roads and viewingareas within the district.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.d) 4. The siting of Communications Facilities which are locatedin the old King,s Highway Regional Historic District requirethe additional approval of the appropriate authority.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility'9. 408.7.5. Scenic Landscapes and Vistas.a) L. Personal wireless service Facilities shall not be locatedwithin open areas that are discernable from public roads,recreational areas, or residential development.The Applicant's proposed Facility is not located within an open area, but will rather belocated in the unused forested lot located behind the church on the Property. Moreover, theApplicant's proposed Facility will be primarily covered by the Property's natural tree line andatso Uy u .*.nittg buffer comprised of proposed trees to be planted and maintained by theApplicant. A majority of the Tower compound will be covered behind the guise of theProperty's natural tree line. The proposed antennas and cable will be entirely concealed withinthe proposed clock tower.b) 2. Any Communications Facility that is located within 300 feetof a scenic road, as designated by the town, shall not exceed theheight of vegetation at the proposed location. If the facility islocated farther than 300 feet from the scenic road, the heightregulations described in 408.7.6.1' shall apply.
X PRINCE LOBELThe Applicant's proposed Facility is located along Route 28, which is not deemed ascenic road. purth"r*o.e, and as indicated on the Plans, the proposed Facility is located greaterthan three hundred feet (300.00') from Old Main Street (a designated scenic road). As such, thisprovision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.c)3. Personal Wireless Service Facilities shall not be locatedwithin the Viewshed as designated and located in the VCOD.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.10. 408.7.6. Dimensional Requirements. All Communications Facilitiesshall compty with the dimensional and setback requirements ofBylaw section 203 (Intensity of Use Regulations).As indicated on the ZoningSummary on Sheet A-2 of the Plans, the Applicant'sproposed Facility complies with all dimensional and setback requirements of Section2}3 of theBylaw.11. 408.7.6.3. Ileight, Side- and Roof-Mounted Facilities. Side- androof-mounted Personal Wireless Facilities shall not project morethan ten feet (10') above the height of an existing building nor projectmore than ten feet above the height limit of the zoning district withinwhich the facitity is located. Personal Wireless Service Facilities maylocate on a building that is legally non-conforming with respect toheight, provided that the facilities do not project above the existingbuilding height.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.12, 408.7.6.4. Height, Existing Structures. New antennas located on anyof the following structures existing on the effective date of this bylawshall be exempt from the height restrictions of this bylaw providedthat there is no increase in height of the existing structure as a resultof the installation of a Communications Facility: guyed towers, latticetowers, and monoPoles.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.13. 408.7.6.5. Height, Existing structures, (utitity). New antennaslocated on any of the following existing structures shall be exemptfrom the height restrictions of this bylaw provided that there is nomore than twenty foot (20') increase in the height of the existingstructure as a result of the installation of a Communication Facility:electric transmission and distribution towers, water towers,
X PRINCE LOBELtelephone poles and similar existing utility structures. Thisexemption shall not apply in the old King's Highway RegionalIlistoric District, within 300 feet of the right-of-way of any scenicroadway.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.14. 408.7.6.6. Microwave antennas exceeding L2 inches in diameter on aroof or building-mounted facility shall not exceed the height of thestructure to which they are attached, unless fully enclosed.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.lS. 408.7.7. Parking Requirements. All Communications Facilities mustmeet the parking and buffer requirements of Bylaw section 30L(Parking and Loading Requirements).As shown on the Plans, the Applicant's proposed Facility complies with this provision ofthe Bylaw. The existing parking lot located at the Property will serve as a means of access and"gr".r to the driveway serving the Facility. The existing parking lot already includes a twentyfJot 1ZO.OO') wide buffer from the boundary of the Property abutting Route 28. Furthermore,there is a ten foot (10.00'), more or less, natural screening buffer between the existing parkingand the outer boundary oithe Facility. The Applicant proposes to plant trees within this ten foot(10.00') buffer zone that comply with the requirements of Section3}l'4'9 of the Bylaw. Thedriu"*uy leading to the Faciliiy contains a vegetated buffer exceeding the required minimum often feet (tO.OO,), and the vegetated buffer will be planted with trees that meet the requirements ofthe zoning Bylaw. Lastly, the single driveway serving the Facility is adequate to meet the needsof the rorrtirrc maintenante visits ut the Facility, which will consist of approximately one vehiclemaking bi-weekly visits to the Facility. As such, the proposed Facility complies with thisprovision of the Bylaw.16. 408.7.8. Fall Zones. Communications towers, whether free-standingor part of another structure or building, must be set back from allproperty lines by at least the total height of the tower structure andits appurtenances.As shown on the Plans, the proposed Tower will be located a distance of one hundred andtwenty four feet (124.00') from the Property's boundary line. As such, the Applicant's proposedFacility satisfies this requirement of the Bylaw.17 . 408.7 .9 Aesthetics.408.7.9.1. Landscaping. Existing mature tree growth andnatural land forms on sites shall be preserved to the maximumextent possible. screening for sites buffers and parking lotsa)
X PRINCE LOBCLmust meet the criteria outlined in section 301 Parking andLoading. In additional, the base of communication towersshall be screened from view by a minimum four (4) foot wideplanting strip maintained with densety planted shrubs not lesslhan six (6) feet in height. Shrubs shall be at least seventy-fivepercent Q5%) eyergreens. Fences or walls may be a part ofsuch screening where deemed necessary, as approved by theSite Plan Review Team. In locations where the visual impactof communications towers would not be an issue, theserequirements may be reduced or waived by the Buildingcommissioner upon unanimous vote by the Site Plan ReviewTeam.As shown on the Plans, the Applicant's proposed Facility will be primarily surrounded bythe property,s existing natural tree tine. furttrerrnore, a natural screening buffer of planted treeswill belnstalled and maintained between the Facility's boundary line and the existing parking lotlocated on the property. As examined above, the natural screening buffer complies with theparking and Loading iequirements of the Bylaw. Moreover, the Applicant has proposed alandsciping plan described in detail on the Plans indicating the installation, maintenance andcare of the trees to be planted at the Facility. Additionally, the Facility will be enclosed by a sixfoot (6.00') stockade f"rr"". Finally, the Siie Plan Review Team has reviewed and approved theplans. In ail, the Applicant's proposed Facility complies with this provision of the Bylaw'18.408.7.10. Color and Camouflage.a)408.7.10.1. Color. Communications towers and antennas shallmaintain a light gray or light blue finish, unless otherwiserequired by the Board of Appeals. Communication towersand/or antennas installed on an existing building or structureshall be camouflaged to match the building or structure towhich they are attached or the background against which theyare most commonly seen.The Applicant's proposed Facility shall comply with this provision of the Bylaw.b) 408;.10.2. Camouflage by Existing Buildings or Structures:1. When a communications Facility extends above the roofheight of a building on which it is mounted, a reasonablegooh fuith effort shall be made to conceal the facility withinor behind existing architectural features to limit itsvisibility from public ways. Facilities mounted on a roofshall be stepped back from the front faqade in order tolimit their impact on the building's silhouette.
X PRINCE LOBELThis provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility2. Communications Facilities which are side mounted shallblend with the existing building's architecture and shall bepainted or shielded with material which is consistent withthe design features and materials of the building'This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.c)408.7.10.3. Camouflage by vegetation: If communicationsFacilities are not camouflaged from public viewing areas byexisting buitdings or structures, they shall be surrounded bybuffers of dense tree growth and understory vegetation in alldirections to create an effective year-round visual buffer.Ground-mounted Personal wireless Service Facilities shallprovide a vegetated buffer of sufficient height and depth toeffectively screen the facility. Trees and vegetation may beexisting on the subject property or installed as part of thep.opot.d facility or a combination of both' The Board ofipfeaf shall determine the types of trees and plant materialsand depth of needed buffer based on site conditions'As stated above and as shown on the landscaping plans described in the Plans, theApplicant,s proposed Facility complies with this prwision of the Bylaw' The Applicant herebyugr""r to nrrttrei comply with the tioard of Appeals' recommendations regarding the type anddepth of trees needed to maintain and on-site buffer'19. 405.7.11. Lighting and Signage'1.. Communications Facilities shall be lighted only if requestedby the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)' Lighting ofequipment structure and any other facilities on site shall besnie[Aea from abutting properties. There shall be a total cutoffof all light at the property lines of the parcel to be developed,and footcandle measurements at the property line shall be 0.0initial foot candles when measured at grade'The Applicant hereby agrees to comply with this provision of the Bylaw' The proposedtower will not include a lightb) 2. Signs shall meet the design and display criteria of BylawSection 303.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility. Theonly sign thai will be displayed at the Facility is a "No Parking" sign located at the start of thea)
X PRINCE LOBELdriveway leading to the Facility and small signs within the compound, as may be required by theFCC and not for advertising pu{poses.c) 3. All ground mounted communications Facilities shall besurrounded by a security barrier where appropriate andnecessary.The Applicant's proposed Facility complies with this provision of the Bylaw. As statedabove and as iho*tr otr ih" Plans, the proposed Facility will be surrounded by a six foot (6.00')stockade fence which will be secured at all times. Only authorized personnel will have accessand egress through the fences.20.408.7.12. Equipment shelters. Equipment shelters forCommunications Facilities shall be designed consistence with one ofthe following design standards: 1. Equipment shelters shall belocated in underground vaultsl or 2. Equipment shelters shall bedesigned consistence with traditional Cape Code architectural stylesand materials, with a roof pitch of at least 10/1.2 and wood clapboardor shingle siding; or 3. Equipment shelters shall be camouflagedbehind an effective year-round landscape buffer, equal to the heightof the proposed shelter, and/or fence. The Board of Appeals (and/orthe Old Kingns Highway Regional Historic District Committee) shalldetermine the style of any fencing and landscape buffer that iscompatible with the neighborhood.The Applicant's proposed Facility complies with this provision of the Bylaw. As shownon the Plans and specification material packages submitted herewith, the Facility's appurtenantequipment cabinets will be sheltered behind the two (2) six foot (6.00') stockade fencessgrrounding the Property. Furthermore, the Property's natural tree line and a screening buffer ofnatural trees will also serve to shelter the Facility's equipment cabinets.21. 408.7.13. Environmental Standards.a) 408.7.13.1. The location of any Communications Facility in ornear wetlands is subject to the Wetlands ProtectionRegulations of the Yarmouth Conservation Commission.This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility.b)408.7.13.2. The handling, storage, or disposal of hazardousmaterials is subject to Yarmouth Board of Health regulationsand, when applicableo Section 406 of this Bylaw.The Applicant hereby agrees to comply with this provision of the Bylaw
X PRINCE LOBELc)The Applicant herebyherebysubmits the case studY PrePared bY408.7.13.3. Ground-mounted equipment for Personal wirelessservice Facilities shall not, during normal operation, generatenoise in excess of 50 db (non-continuous) at the property line.agrees to comply with this provision of the Bylaw. The Applicantdatedd)This provision of the Bylaw is not applicable to the Applicant's proposed Facility22. 408.7.14. SafetY Standards.408.7.I3.4. Roof-mounted or side-mounted equipment forPersonal wireless service Facilities shall not, during normaloperation, generate noise in excess of 50 db (non-continuous) atground level at the base of the building closest to the antenna.408.7.14.1. Radio-frequency Radiation (RFR) Standards' Allequipment proposed for a Communications Facility shall beauthorized per the FCC Guidelines for Evaluating theEnvironmental Effects of Radio-frequency Radiation (FCCGuidelines).a)As indicated in the RF Coverage study submitted herewith this application, theApplicant's proposed Facility and its appurtenant equipment complies with this provision of thenyiaw. an nfn report prepared by Don Haes is submitted herewith and shows full compliancewith all applicable RFR set by the FCC'V. ConclusionThe Applicant hereby respectfully states that the Applicant's proposed Facility satisfiesthe requiremenis for the appiovai of the requested Special Permit. The Property is an appropriatelocation for the installation and operation of the proposed Facility and the proposal set forthherein represents the least intrusive and only feasible means through which the AT&T and T-Mobile can close the significant gap in reliable service coverage in the vicinity of the property.As demonstrated herein, the Proposed Facility meets the criteria of Section 103.2.2. of the Bylawand, as such, the requested special permit should be granted and, further, the grant of any waiverrequested will not derogate from the intent of the Bylaw.For the foregoing reasons, the Applicant respectfully requests that the Board grantapproval for the requested Special Permit'SincerelEsq
X PRINCE LOBELDirect: 617-456-8123Email : rsousa@princelobel.com
4
X PRINCC LOBCLDecember 30,2022VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERYTown of Yarmouth,ZonrngBoard of AppealsYarmouth Town Hall1146 Route 28Yarmouth, MA 02664RE:Property Address:Applicant:Request to Waive Certain Special Permit Requirements1044 Route 28, Yarmouth, MA 02664Assessor's Map 50, Parcel 189.1 (the "Property")Blue Sky Towers III, LLC,d/b/a BSTMA III, LLC ("Blue Sky" or the "Applicant")Dear Honorable Members of the ZoningBoard of Appeals:This firm represents the Applicant in connection with its application for the Special Permit byZoninggoaid of Appeal lihe "Board") of the Town of Yarmouth (the "Town") to permit thedevelo"pment of the Applicant's proposed wireless telecommunications facility at the Property.The Applicant respectfully requests that the Board waive the following submittal requirementsset forth under Section 408.6 of the Town of YarmouthzoningBylaw (the "Bylaw"):1. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.7.6.L: "Height, General. Regardless of thetype of mount, Personal Wireless Service Facilities shall be no higher than ten feet abovetG urr"rug" height of buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility. PersonalWireless Servii Facilities rnay locate on a building that is legally non-conforming withrespect to height, provided that the facilities do not project above the existing buildingheight.', The proposed Tower will not exceed 200' - the Tower is proposed to be 110'(1 15, for top of roof). The Applicant requests a waiver for height because there are notexisting structures oisignificant height to permit the FCC licensed cameras to fill theirsignificant gaPs in coverage.2. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.7.6.2.: "Height, Ground-Mounted Facilities.Ground-mounted Personal Wireless Service Facilities shall not project higher than tenfeet above the average building height or, if there are no buildings within 300 feet, thesefacilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the tree canopy height, measuredfrom ground level jAbL). I; no case may height exceed 200 feet above ground level."The proposed Tower will not exceed 200' -the Tower is proposed to be 110' (115' fortop of roog. The Applicant requests a waiver for height because there are not existing
X PRINCE LOBELstructures of significant height to permit the FCC licensed cameras to fill their significantgaps m coverage.3. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.6.3.1.H.: "Distances, at grade, from theproposed Communications Facility to each building on the vicinity plan." The Applicantiras included many of the distances to other buildings, however, the Applicant is notpermitted to enter adjacent properties.4. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.6.3.1.I.: "Contours at each two feet abovemean sea level for the subject property and adjacent properties within 300 feet."5. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.6.3.1.L.: "Lines representing the sight lineviewpoint (point from which view is taken) and visible point (point being viewed) from,.Sight Lines" sub-section below." The Applicant will submit photo simulations after the"rurr" test and balloon test are conducted and the Applicant will supplement theapplication to the board.Waiver of the requirement of Section 405.6.3.2.A.: 'oSign line representation. A sightline representation shall be drawn from any public road within 300 feet and the closestfagade of each residential building (viewpoint) within 300 feet to the highest point(visible point) of the Communications Facility. Each sight line shall be depicted inprofile, dra*n at one inch equals 40 feet. The profiles shall show all intervening treesand buildings. In the event there is only one (or more) residential building within 300feet there shall be at least two sight lines from the closest habitable structures or publicroads, if any." The Applicant will submit photo simulations after the crane test andballoon test are conducted and the Applicant will supplement the application to the board.partial waiver of strict compliance with the requirement of Section 408.6.3'2.D': "VisualImpact. Photographic simulations from a distance of one hundred, one thousand, and fivethousand feet a-nd from four different locations of approximately ninety degrees apart ofthe proposed Communication Facility." The Applicant will submit photo simulationsafter the crane test and balloon test are conducted and the Applicant will supplement theapplication to the board.8. Waiver of strict compliance with the requirement of Section 408.6.3.3.D': ooExisting treesand shrubs at curreniheight and proposed trees and shrubs at proposed height at the timeof installation, with approximate elevations dimensioned." The Applicant requests furtherdiscussion from the Board on the specific requirements of this provision of the Bylaw.g. Waiver of the requirement of Section 408.6.3.3.E.: 'oGrade changes' or cuts and fil1s, tobe shown as original grade and new grade line, with two-foot contours above mean sealevel."67
X PRINCE LOBELThe Applicant respectfully requests the aforementioned waivers because those submittalrequiriments are not applicable to the Applicant's proposed project at the Property and thewaiver of the same by the Board will not derogate from the intent of the Bylaw.Thank you for your attention to this matter.Sincerely,?**r*-nicaldb M. Sousa, Esq.Prince Lobel Tye LLPOne International Place, Suite 3700Boston, MA 02110Direct: 617-456-8123Email : rsousa@princelobel. com
5
ProTerraDESIGN OROUP' LLCaovSuil€ot200035Ph: (4r3)l2o-4918CONSULfANISTs'tAMP:s.dDATE: 11/28/2022DRAWN: tsLM/SfZScntf: SEf PLANo6&odoztrts=o6czF&doeozt-=oouF&a1l}lilEEiEilsltsg*OEtsiHHE*Hs3HilHE(tJ*j., Hgd tgst o<l l-TITI,E SHEETJOB NO.: 17-056T-1g$ET fITLE:CHECKI JMM,/TEJ2oUIaIIUJE(tz-l-l--=Eu,lo.BLUE SI(YTOWERS III, LLCDDSITE NAME: SOUTH YARMOUTHSITE NUMBER: MA'5104ADDRESS: 1044 ROUTE 28SOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664CO.APPLICANT INFORMATION{F.'Mobile'SITE NUMBER: 4HY0604HT-MOBILE NORTHEASI, LLC15 COMMERCE WAYSUITE BNORTON, MA 02766caB52CO.APPLICANT INFORMATIONgat&tSrE NUMBER: MA-5104NEV./ CJNGULAR WRTLESS PCS, LLCl"AT&l'')!50 cocnttunre coeoFRAMINGHAM, MA OI7OlDRAWING INDEXSHEETDESCRIPIIONREVISIONT-lTITLE SHEITc*1ABUTTTRS PLAN & EXISTINC CONDITJONS3A-1AERIAL & USGS MAPS5COMPILED PLOT PLAN5A-3OVERALL SITE PLAN5A-4COMPOUND PLAN & ELEVATIONA-5PLANTING PLAN5SE-1SITINC ELEVATIONS5D--1DE TAILScA-l TO CA-4CO-APPLICANT DETAILS5tc -lEROSION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS5GENERAL NOTESCONTRACIORSHALLVERIFYALLPLANSANDEXISTINGDIMENSIONSAND1.SITEANDSHALLIMMEDIATELYNOTIFYTHECONDITI0NsONTHT JOBDISCREPANCITSENGINEER&APPLICANTREPRESENTATI VEINWlITINGOFBEFOREPROCEEDINGUTHTHEWORKORBERESPONSIBLEFORSAMT,2.3.PLANSr0RPERMIlTIN6PURPOSTSONLY.NOTFORCONSTRUCTION,ALLUNDTRGROUNDUTILITYINFORMATIONwAsDETERMINEDFROMSURFACE INVISTIGATIONSANOEXISTINGPLANSOFRtc0R0.THEc0NTRACTORSHALLLOCAT[ALLUNDIRGROUNOUTILITIESINTHErIELDPRIOR TOANYSITEw0Rr(CALLDIC-SAFE(888)144-123372-H0URS4.PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION'riiii s'rrei wni ontotreLrv PRTNTED To ANsr 0 (22"x34") wTH 1 ^.r'innoirli"pnii.iiNc ro rnsr a (r1"xr7") wLL RESULT rN A HALF-SCALEii',iiinier srr wlH l/2" vnncrns. corrtnu ALL scALED DlsTANctsil,rrH cRepsrcel scALEs sHo\tlN HEREINiii,i, i"i,.i""inor'i sHlr cotronu lo AtL APPLIcABLE coDEs ANDiiirrirnellti'ltl-cluott'tc sut Nor LIMITED T0 TrrE FoLLo\IING:aiir'oini-iooe, r,rnssAcl-lust115 sTATE gullDlNc coDE (780 cMR) 9IHEDTTTON (2015 l8C) AND AMENDMINTSiiiiinru,L dooi'NEc 2020 wrTH MAsSAcHUSETTS AMENDMTNTS (527cMR 12.00)iiili i,'Coiicr rs suBJecT To REVTEW AND APPRovAL 8Y THE cAPt-coDcniurssrox (ccc) THRoucH lTs DtvtLoPMENT oF RE0IoNAL IMPAcIoicrirorl rn iroortrol ro LocAL APPRovALS5.6.PROJECT INFORMATIONRAW LAND WRELESSCOMMUNICATIONS FACILITYPROPOSED 110' TALL CHURCII TOWIRiiiiri r-lcHrsr APPURTENANcE) wrH\s'ioo' rrucro coMPouND wTHIN100'x100' LEASE AREA.SOUTH YARMOUTHMA- 51 041044 ROUTE 28soutn vanvoutH, MA 02664MAP 50 LoT 189.1flifiLTirii,,d'b1,:fi I ^?'JB,',J,.', (fi[!?' )41' 39' J2.O8"+ N (suRVEY 1A)70' 12' 15.16"t w (suRVEY 1A)13.6'lNAD83/NAVD88N/F ROMAN CAIHOLIC BISHOP OF FALLnivrn c/o sr. Plus xP.O. BOX 2577FALL RIVER, MA 02722BLUT SKY TOWERS III, LLC352 PARK STRTETiB'JF 'R?oo'*., MA 01864PROTERRA DESIGN GROUP' LLC4 BAY ROADBUILDING Al SUITE 200HADLEY. N,lA 01035TEL. (4i3) 320-4918NORTHEAST SURVEY CONSULTANTS3 FTRRY STREETSTUDIO I EASTEASTHAMPTON, I.IA O]027TEL: (413) 203-5144APPLICANT:SITE ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:SITE TYPE:SCOPE OF WORK:LATITUDf:LONGITUDE:(P) Et,t vATloN:DATUM:PROPERTY OWNER:SITE NAME:SITE NUMBER:SITE ADDRESS;ASSESSOR.S TAX IDfl:ZONING DISTRICT(S):VICINITY MAPozoLOCUStSWAN POND.r$N@SCALE: 1" = 1000'r (22x34)l" = 2ooo'r (l1xl7)3
ProTerraDESICN GB('UP. LLG4 8oY RoodAuildino A: Suite 200Hoaey, MA 01035(4lJ)120-49185I4uPi.0ANrtL f.sTASZNo 47160DAIr: OB/07/2o20SHEET |ITLE:AEIIME&S PI,IN&EXISTNC CONDITIONS201-5144CONSUL IAN TSrNORTHEAST SURVEYCONSULTANTSazo6,l=ul*sle"lodtc14 IFz6,ozxL-l=lrlfEl[=-lt91,,IFotd>lfF<l;\l\!16@Frl*\l\NIO\l\o.lo-l-trrE- *SIEH:EHEE':lFIsa{:tEHH*H€3r.' qH HF$H Eo>Jo-- Hpd t5et oJOB NO.: 17-29Oc-1DRAWN: JD6CHECK: ACfSCAtfi 1"=4O'N/FlRFIPF,/- NOW OR FORMERLY- IRON PrP[ / R00 roUND_ CONCRITE SOUND FOUND_ CATCH BASIN- U1ILITY POLE- LOCUS PROPERTY LINE- ABUTTERS PROPERTY LINE_ ZONING LINE- FE['A FLOOD ZONI LINI_ CONTOUR LINE* OVERHEAD WRE_ TREELINE50-rJ50-r050'9,o.r"" H/!,*nu"o"P.O. 80X 941SOUN YARMOUff. MA 0266450-aALI EN E- RYil€P.O. AOX 440aREffi[n, MA 0263150-95RITA SI NO68 FORES] ROADSOUB YARMOUTH. MA 0265450-96N/FKAftLEEN J. SERRANO16 TAIOR SMEETWAITHAM, MA 02154ooEpI.!'I50-97AN1HONY PINO14 TANOR SINEETWALTHAM, ilA 02453/D0t- -1 i";\!. it. ii:.1 ,:.:i:'::l )__--_..__ ouw+*'50-r00n,"oo l'FooooooA9 LONG POND DRIW5OUTN YARilOUfr, MA 02661a:..,- tl;/ 1 ..-.,",,' i.;.i\:ao&o2oA()zoFl/1F__50-188JOHN SIAMOS174 CAPTAIN NOY€S NOAOSOUTH YARMOUIH, MA 02664lRUSTnoAoMA 02537cBrls-50-1r7.rN/FMARY N6US MULTE{245 MAN STREETWAREHAM. MA 0257tcr.14orn.\-\50-!84.1.1WG YARMOUfr NEALTY TLC1O4 SLMOT ROADDTERFIELD, IL 6001550-3N/FROBERI F. KOVAN2OJ BEECH STm€NlHAM. MA 02093B_ffoAQa5 "e"OsA(A,ti.)t\:;;. t].,50-191N/fALTON H, HST70 toNo PoNO oRlwSOUft YARSOUNI, MA(I^)02664450-185N/FYARMOUTH 8AY ASSOC, L]0. INC,PO 80X 14115READING. PA 1961250-194JOHN F. CASAE10 AWON LANESOUTH YARU@N.02664ABUTTEHSPLAN & EXISTING CONDITIONSANS| D (22"x1.") scALE: I-={ornsr e irr"'tr") SCALE I'=ao'40'0'40'80'tt- F50-t86N/FMARNN FAIIILY TRUSIPO BOX J50SOU1H YANMOUff, MA 0266{5325LEGENDFAA1.A CERTIFICATIONCERTIFY TI'IAT THIREOUIREMENTS OFFEET VERTICALLYTITUDE.LONGITUOE, AND ELTVATION PRESINTEDWTH THE FOI.LOWNG ACCURACIES'IIERfONI HEREBYMEET THETHETHRIETWENFEET HORIZONIALLYo91o1l3ot2_DATEF. STASZ.ll 47160SURVEY NOTES1. SITE OEIAIL SHOWN ON THIS SURVTY IS BASED ON 'IILD DATA COLLECTED ON NOVEMBER' iri,':61i. r',ii sunviv rs Fnepnn?il r,'r corirbnvaucf lvrTH-'IHE.PRocEDURES ANDnrb,irniiierlri rtin oara accuuuiJrrbru sunvtYS. As sET.FoRTH.rN 250 cMR sEcTroN6.02. BoUN0ARY INFoRMATIoN rs"cbvdiLeo-r'n'or"r ilEcoRD DocuMEN-Is AND ls NoilloeE eo-NiiiiuiD ei Hevt'ro eerN oriiarneo es rHE R[9uLT- 9-r'j.l]FLD BoUNDARYiunGV, nirols sue',rcr to cnaiEf eli eru AccuRATE FIELD SURVEY MAY DlscLosE'2. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURWY IS IO SUPPOR1 THT DESIGN AN_D ^C.ONSTRUCIION OT A' i;iei6r,ii,Jxicairoi,i ieirlrrv. usi olr-rsrs sunvry By ^NYoNe.oIHFR THAN BLUE sKYrnwFe< ilr r c ANo usE or rnli Sunvri ron nnv punpost Nor RELATEo To THEoiir-Cru oi' rtre rrureruoro FAoLTTY rs slRlcTl Y PRoHlBlrEo3. PROPERIY LINES AND BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS SIIOW\ ON T!l,S S93]1fY ARE BAseo oN AcoMprLATroN oF REcoRDEo prnus"iiii orioiatlo r'nr ruor TNJENoED ro RTPRESENToiiii.riiivi iricriirornirir'irs on ili uslo ron THE PURPoSES-oF-c-oNVEYANcE;i'd;iiii iiir-ni-eo'iruionvrrror'r us r'rot BEEN CoNFTRMED BY FIEID SURVEYbijilnvei,oi,ri eno ro esscssr,ieiti-oi r,wo occupeTroN-tr$._B_qEN coNoucreD rNTHE pREpARATToN or rHrs sunviv. ipnoi;rnrv lirur RETRACIMENT SURVEY HAs NolBEEN CONDUCTED,4 TH€ PROPERIY LINES SHOWN ON TIIIS PLAN ARE THT LINES DIVIDING EXISTINGow{ERsHrp's. AND THf LtNts or sinrers AND wAYS lHoryN LBE.-IlrosE oF PUgLlc oRPRTVATE STRTETS On wovs ernEr,"oi'?sraairsHib, lr'ro ruo rrw LINES FOR lllvlsloN 0Fiii6iinc bwrnsnlp oR FoR NEw wAYS ARE sHowN5. PRIMARY GEODETIC SURVEY CONTROL WAS ESTABLISHIO FROM AN ON TI][ GROUNOsuRVEy usrNc THE cLoBAL postrionrlc sYsiEM (GPS) oN Nov€M^BfR 28' 201'l rHEHORIZONTAL REF€RENCED ONTUU'ii TIJi I'TEO AT 'BESdO ON THE CRS 80 REF€RENCEELLrpsorD. THE cRto cooRDlNArri'anr-aniio olt tttt ltassacsusETTs srATE PLANEl-oiinowere sYsTIM oF 1963 coRss6 (MATNLAND 2ool) ELEVATIoNS sHowt{ ARtAssuMED AND aRr appnox'vrrib-io iir rlnvo aa vdRttceL,Deruv v[RtlcAL ANDijoniior,fieL rnr"onvnloll sHowi-ueirs TriE STANoARD CRTTERIA FOR AN FAA 1ACinrrrrclrror (20'a HoRIzoNTAL AND .J'r vERTIcAL)'6. tN lHt EVENI lHAl BENCHMARKS (TBMS). ISTABLISHLD FOR THISfRoJECT ANoprBLrsHED oN THrs suRvtY, erii ii-sintVii nol nrtovenrere.oR A DIScREPANcY rsi6,]r.,ri rgg-ijsii snouro loniv?rs i'rrut iN wmrrruc PRIoR ro coMMeNclNc oRCONTINUING ANY WORK.7. TNE LOCUS PARCET IS SHOW\ AS PARCFI 5O'I89.1 IN THE TOWN OF YARMOU'IH TAXASSESSOR'S DATABASE.8. IHt PROJECT AREA rs LOCATED lN FLoOD ZONE AE (BASE |LOO0- ELEVATION = 11') &- ioir "i;1itraoEo) (AREAS oF 0.2% ANNUAL cHANcr Flo-oD: AREAs or 1z ANNU^L8i,i'*cf rioiio-wii 'rvineoe oii'lss or-Lisi rHan I F-ooI--ol---!vTH DRATNAGE ARE^siiii'ri,iriilrjurir'uri-r; aruo anrns PRoTtcTED BY LEVEES tRoM lz ANNUALii,ei,cr rLoool, e"D loNE x (-u"inroeo) (^REAS or MINIMAL FLooDTNG) As.snowN.oNiiiiiioiru.siriuriir RATI MAP cb-uvtiinirv FirutL NUMBER 25oo1c 0s87 J' DAI[0 JULYt6,2011.9. TI]E LOCUS PARCEL IS LOCAIED IN THE TOWN OF YARIUOUTH 82 ZONING DISTRICT- ivrlLrci-crrurrR J ovERt-AY DlsTRlcT & HoTcL/MoTEL oVERLAY DrsrRlcr)'10, ALL UNDTRGROUNO UTILITY INFORMATION WAS DETIRM]NED FROM.SURFACE'" inries"iileirorui-aio-ixsrrrc pLr'r'is iir ir.ono rsr qqNr!49roJr sHALL LocATE ^LLuNDERGRouND uTrLlTtEs rN +rtlrELlinron-io-r'n1 sr1q 11011 9l'L THE FoLLowNcriii"irii pCc-corui-rnucloru loiriderton zz-souns PRIoR To ANY EXcAvATIoNelrrvrii orc SAFE SYSTEM (MA, Mt. NH' Rl, vr): 1-BB8-344-72331I. NO WTTLANO DELINEAJIONS WERE OBSERVED.PROPERIY OWNER: ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF FAL| RIVcRC,/O SI. PIUs XF^t* 1i[^'lt"'^ trt,LOCUS DEED REFERENCI: 0EE0 BOOK 669 PAGE 144PLAN R[feReNCES: PLAN BOOK 78 PACE 29II\OFCROUNOEiMU5EE02564SO_ t90N'/FSNORA M. DIGOVANNI,P.O.80X l2a2SOUff YARMOUN. MA128'XBtI.Ptr(ING\I(Btr,PANKING-to1I1o-/1BIT.PffiKINC\245'r tg/\F.I\Il.tetztrt$riLLOCUS50-169.1r/FROUAN CAffOllc SlsHoPOF FALI RIVERc/o sT. Plus xP.O. BOX 2577FALL RIWR, MA 027220EED 669-144. PLAN 78-29I' AREA = 4.4*,\-CilTROL POINT-UAC NAIL SEIN:270J585.55E:1010102.41) i tr.l!-..i1,.!(TIt/",1i.zcaFflOOD€Dru5.ZONE\XWOODEDI333'tI\''FIIcB
ProTerraDESION OROUP' LLC4ouUdlng AiHodlaYBoy Rood$ll! 200MA 0lo3tPh:(413)J20-4918CONSULTANISTSTAMP:*.DATE: tt/28/2022DRAWN: BLM/SfzCHECR: JMM/IEJsCAlEi SEE PLANSHEFI T'AE:ATNAL Tuscs lflPszo6eF6dllEltrctzolEEiiHtrlbrElEsiBIEE3>JfriHPtgo3dJOB NO.: 17-056A-1aoEo2oozoFones r.no4r)IiIt(P) ro' uloErtilLrlY EAsElEl{Tro PUBUC R.o.w.Ii,,e"Al{)oeocovs*oatsfrhr"^(F) 15' rlof,ACC€sS EASfTENTTO PUBUC R.O.lf.4o4o/4t4tsLhF,tfuFIaoa()p"n'tt""rd6',r$ts'.o6)o(r/P) DfiAINAGE' 'EASfiaEllT3n"%,,r%OLOCUS42'r\-$SDDt/ICiI.ijsIEgst.,x{{oTE{It*ta€tOF THE INIIRIOR,REF: "USGS COLOR ORTHOCEOCRAPHIC INFORMATIONIMAGERY (20I3l20I4)" DATALAYER OATED APRIL(MAsscrs),' couilorumr'Ln oF MAssAcHUsETTs.2013/2014 PREPARED BY OFFICE OFrHroriulttotr rEcHNoLocY DlvlsloNREF: OENNIS. MA oUA0RANGLES'rJ.s. cEolocicAl suRVEY, DATEDDEP WETLANDS - DATALAYER PREPARED B\ OF1CE tr144oF GEoGRApHtc tNFoRMATtoN (MAssctS), f///)CoMMONmALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, MASSTT (20og) vzzaPREPARED BY UNI1ED STATES DEPARTMENT2015offi53i\ILOCUS- i' r :'l-taeiiOM4
ProTerraDESIGN GROUP. LLC4 8oy noodguidino A: Suitd 200ro;rex uA 0lol5Ph: (4tl)320-a918coNsr./l- IANISiSIAMP:S"tDAIE: tt/28/2022DRAWN: qLM/STZCHECK: JMM/TEJSCAtf: SFE PLANCOUPILEDPNT PLANzoe2Lucoo=gavozt-=o.1.1.tltlE.lol.ztztztl':lL>t >t:n l[ldcxozF=qo2"1.1"nlFrslIHEEil!Itsl!EssiolEHH*Es!HilHEI*3. q&q tHsl o<l l-JoB NO.: 17'056SHETI flTLE:A-2I++ 50-173 ++I.50-++4t+, *..] so-rbo * r+ i-+ + +|+++++,++++ + +,* i+ 50-171+/ 50-14.' 50- 1550-100|+ -1 i+ 1. +I50- 1650- t0,t50-r7I50-950-6rt\c!?z6+t:IoEIoCCOMPOUNDFENCED(PflTHINTOWERCHURCH00'LEA$ AREAzol{E x(ura6HADED)50- l 9150*192i;50- r9J+l-.11+++++++{++{++ 50-tE8 + ++ i_-+50-198tt\,50''187 * ++52\titHEo62I99\tDDt50 93t\,%\IaIttlttf .o_,,,,\/(E) LOCUSPROPERTY I.IN!\\It,iI/-'+++J++++cc50-2(''?:a'."ir,,II.tIIII',... ''',1,IEASEMENTt+++t-I{IDEEASEMENT50- r 85ie-*-ta-o+R.O.tV.+l, ',,50 175B+BZ(,IIEAE*'50- I-;,A'g.+t++42- f,3. I42- 38++.. 42-J7.1'>;'Jl+++t*4"T++++++:i++t+,:l++++++++(t .t| -.#oPI.ANr"= l60'2REFERENCESPROPERTY LINE, TOPOGRAPHY ANO EXISTINC FEA1URES _ SEE SHEET C_1ZONING OIS1RICIS . MAP ENTITLED ''2ONING MAP OF THI IOWN OF YARMOUTH" UPDATEO-- lrnbucri ANNuAL TowN MetTlNc. MAY 7' 2016THE TOLLOWNG DATALAYTRS PREPARED BY OFFICE OF GEOCRAPHIC INFORMATION'- TIVASiCIS), COMVONWEALTH OI MASSACHUSLITS. MASSIT: auiio'tib sTRUcTUREs (2-D, rRoM oRTHo TMAGrRY) (JUNE 2017)- ileiiriep wert-r.tlos lrinrunes INcLUDING oPEN $TATER' TilARSHES' SwAMPS &TIDAL FLATS) (DECEI4BER 20I7)- FEve runttofuaL FLooD HAZARD LAYERcorrrnr,iiri wriii iiiio'.o iNsunarce nare vep 25001co587J EFrEc-rve^JULY 16 2014""'iiiipniio eriioenm trtrrncir'iiirverlacrvrrur AGENcY' uS-D-EPARTMENT oFLolieiin6 sectfriv. Fonrrors bi iiie srr rne LocA-iED -wrHtN zoNE ^t ANI)zoNE x. zoNE x ,s clesstt'tEo ,ii nr'i-nnra DETIRMTN,E0 TO-BE^OUISIDE THE o 2%ANNUAL cHANcE rLooDPLAlN. ziiile nr ii-n rtun spFctat FLooD HAZARD AREAiu-ijirir io 'rlu*oairoN ev rH-€ oNE-PERclt{t aNNuar cHANcE FLooD wHEREdX$-ir-obi, ilrvniror'ls navr'eriN oeieRMrNeD A PoRrloN-or rH€ PRoPoSED"w?in-r ''i-ioteieo wriHru rano subrrcr ro coAsrAL sroRM FLowAGE| - I .- - aREAs DCTERMINEo ro gE ouTSIoE THt o'2% ANNUAL cHANct| - ll'Nrx-FL..DPLATNI I f ,'*u' it:uqhnilry}l,nil$*fr,fi:i'ii*i:iifi*,ry;,SPECIALFLOODHAZARDAREAS(SrHAs)CHANCESUBJEC'ITOl;iI.1 ,n", o.INTJNDATIONBYlHEANNIJALFLOOD;BASEFLOODELEVATIONSDETERMINED.(LANDSUBJECTTOCOASTALSTORMrLo$/AGt)GENERAL NOTES1.THE TYPE. DIMENSIONS, MOUNIINC HARDWARE, AND POSITIONS OF ATL PROJTCTi,ii"puii-rui aiif isowr.r rn lr-r-usrneiivF rnsitoru rcrun HARDwARI DtTAlLsiriiriiolri uni orrrEn sltcHTLY rRov wHAT rs srlomowNEn'sAND FINAL2. THE PROJICT OVilNER'S PCS FACILITY IS AN UNMANNED PRIVA'TE.ANO- SECURED EOUIPMENT' 'iGiAiifiioi. ii iS bnrinccrsiio b1 inineo TEcrrNrcrANS- F-of, PERroDrc RouTrNEil;;.iiln;ffiE nrlo-riecEroRi ooii r'lor REoulRE ANY wnTER oR..sAN'TARY sEwERsERVrcE. rHE FACTLITY ts nror oo'veiiirij si RECuLAror'ts REQUIRING PUBLIC AccEss PERADA REOUIREMENTSJ. THE DES'6N OF THT IOWER, FOUNOATION AND ANTENNA MOUNTING HARDWARE WLL MEET" iric otni,zE'aurtA-222-G sTANOARDS FOR SrRUC-TURAL slEELjN-TENNA SUPPORI|NGsinutiuies iu.,o srere aulrorrui cb-DE REOIJ|RTMENTS.__oEJATLE_o.coNSTRUCTloNSnniyri.ics-nrii irntiCrunnL caLcuiribNs luLL BE PREPARqq BY A REGISIEREDpRoFEssroNAL ENGTNEER AND sugMiilED wts a eutrott'lc FERl4lr APPIrcATroN FoRhiifir itlo lpiiovai ev rnt locar sutrotNc coDE ENFoRCEMENT oFFrclAL'4. ONCI THE FACILIIY B[COMES FULLY OPERATIONAL, NORMAL ANO RO-UTINE MAINTENANCE6i ,o*in owr,lin.s eruO Crnnrtn;s rlcutrcrarus WLL at PERfofatED 'rHE ES]IMAIEDVEHICULAR TRAFTIC GENTRATED TJi TNEii VSITS IS,PREOICIEO TO BE LESS THAN THEiii;idii ieaiiic deriekerEo 8Y A STNGLE-FAI\1ILY DwELLTNGZONING SUMMABYzoNrNG 0ts-rRlcl(s):oVERLAY DISTRICT(S):ASSESSORS l0:(P) usE:BUSINESS DISTRICT (82)HOTEL./MOTEI. OVERLAY DISIRICT I (HMoDl)ur r eir certERs ovERLAY DtsTRlcT 3 (vcl) 'MAP 50 LOT I89 Iilinsonei-v*neiess sEnvcE rectLtTv 2DIMENSIONPROVIDEDCONS'IRAINTPARCEL - AREA44 AC*20,000 sF MlN.PARCEL. FRONTAGE1,223'tr 25' MrN.PARCEL .& (P)IMPERVIOUS COVTRAGf3A%*852 MAX.COMPOUND _ FRONT113'*15'MlN.COMPOUND. SDE YARO1't7'lx15'MrN.(P) COMPOUND * RFAR YARD69'f20'MiN.(P)COMPOUNDACCESSORYS'IRUCTUREHEIGIlT14 fJ5.MAX.CHURCH TOWER - HEIGHTAPPURTENANC[)r15''200 MAX.CHURCHTOVIERDISlANCETOPROPERTY LINTr2r'i(rooz HETGHT)FACILITY DISTANCEtoscENlcROAD>300'(oLD MAINSTREET)1 . TOWN OF YARMOU.TIJ. ZONING BYLAWS 2OI7. €20]-5 TAELE OF DIMENSIONALciourciueuii (r1 rrHr vtr-ace ierurens ovrnrnv DlsTRlcr (vcoD) ovERLAYs.olHERorsTRrcTs AND r"t otvets'o*oi.nloutnrurnrs oF sEcTloN 414 sHALL GovERN "2 - Tot{t,l oF YARMOUTH, ZONING AYLAWS 2ol7' s40872! ALL-o-WED AREAS: "1 THE- irrinbnr pensorlt wrREr-Ess tacrrrrres sHALL BE ALLowED lN ANY zoNlNGDISIRICT,...,sPEclAL CONSIDERATION FOR IllE FOLLOWNGi] _ TOW\ OF YARMOUTH. ZONING BYLAWS 2017, S40S.7.6.2 HEIGHl' GROUND-MOUNTEOTACILITIES: ''GROUND.MOUNTED PlRSOruNI WRELESS sERVICE FAC]LINES SHALL NOTPROJECT HlGrlER rum rer'r rrei-ado'vi rrle evEnace SU|L0|NG-HEIGHT 0R lF THEREiii'io eu[uNcs wrHrru roo-irii-itrEsE rectLtrtEs sHALL NoT PRoJEcT HIGHERTI]AN TTN FETT ABOVE THE I'ViIiICi TNEE CIIIOPV HEIOXT' T'IEASTIRED FROM GROUNDLEVEL (AGL). IN NO CASE ITAVIiIC"T TiCETO ZOO FEE.I ABOVI GROUND LEVEL-,,++i+++1+.l
ProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLCa 8oy Rooda"tdi.o A: Suile 200Hoikr MA ol0J5Ph: (4lJ)J20-4914coNsuL-r4lvIs.SlAMP:8.DAIE: 11/28/2022SCALIi 5E[ PIANlEl lIFIHc l"el3FttlEl3l;ul>lalsiilldlol-11IlzlloltsEI9l.l-nlEEiEil*1trl:EHH HEEEEI*j., Hpil ;H8l o<t FSHEEI NTLE:A-3DRAwr: tsLM/sTZCHECK: JMM/TEJJOB No.: 17-056OVERALLSITE Pl/'N3(E) CHURCH-BUILDIN G5IZONEX(ul{sfiADEO)(E) viooDEDAREAFENCID COIJPOUND ANDCHURCH TOWER IUTHIN]OO.x1OO. LEASE AREADr^noo'\ lo,.'oI4.r,-- (P)II/*"4\FEhIA 'LOOD(zONE x)BOUNDARY4tt. tq-...1O-Lal--IT!=(P) TREE LINE/f}.-\x.a #'FEMA FLOOD (ZONE AE)]OO YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ANDLAND SUBJECT IO COASTALSTORII FLO\IAGE II' AN4SL(ABOVE T{EAN S€A LEVEL)a"*,q -'a;(P)PEAr2" yJIDEGRAVTLDIAPHRAGM/IdrlLOCUSN/FBOilAil OATHOUC llSHoPOF FAII RII'TR PARI8Hc/o 8T. PIUS XP,O' EOX 252FAU.nNEn, ilAe7ZllaP 6lt f,ol 1E0.1AnEA - 4'4 AC*.4PAVEDccSOIL MAP UNIT: 252ACARVTR COARSE SANDHSG: 'A'VEG€TATEO SV/ALIEROSION CONTROLBLANKET. TYP,(F) PAD I/OUNTEDIRANSTORMER-. _-lrdF(P)WTH!'..zol{E x(sHAltED)(E) wooDEoARE A(E) UTrLllY354POLE\/lr 59'1\cO..9'(cHURCHTOWER FACE)!,fI(E) PAVEMENIMARKINGS. IYPII\r AcL)LI,;Atiuh'rlzI,.t"tt:liti.uTZONE AE{P) DRAINAGT' , EASEI]ENT(P) TREE LINEtr,)\f (e) etr. ontveOVERHE AOa-...1It'IIIIIIIB(E) TDGE OFpriwvrrur. rvP.II-l-II\(P) NO PARKING'AREA(p) rs woe \AccESS EASEMENT -IO PUBLIC R.O W,u-fl=-oI)-t_(E) PAVEDl PiixrNc rot,'l"'5(P) INFILTRAIION BASINwrri qeottarnt roeeglY(PRF ]RIATMENT)(E) NATURAL- VEGEIATET)r FILTER STRIP(E) UTtLlrY POLI f#200-36 \(P) UNDERGROUNDU lILI TIES(r) PAVEoPARKING LOTIIIIII..1IIIII.t(P) ro' wrDEIJ1ILI TY EASEMENTTO PUBL{C R,O.W.lll -fO'CONNICT UNDERGROUND UTILITIESTO (E) UTILITY POLI d200-36cooitDrNATE wTH UTJLITYPLIRVEYOR. UPCRADE AS REOUIRIDBOUTE 28J2ILllJJ7-,a..-1i',@DISTURBANCE SUMMARY^RE^ (SF)I TEM9,690IREE CLEARING3,82s&YcoMPouND)SURFGR AV[L(DRIVEWAACES(P)6,320405(P)u/G uTlLllY INSTALL TO R O W.(P) LO^M & s[€D1 0.550TOTAL EARTH OIS1URBANCI
-t
0,
6.
-.-
o)
t'
m
6
oz
o5oc
-3
rro
q:
5,
;qP
?
k)
Elar
P
lo
l3
l=l!
""&
o
:\\
T
D
z
"F E
FEU
3B
=L=
REVISIONS
ISSUED FCR PERMITT]NG
P'RMITTINC REVSED
PiRMITTING REVISLU
PERMITTING REV1SED
PTRMITTING REVISED
PFRMITTING REVISED
DATE
ts /12/2
tl /24/22
NO.
a
1
5
TITLE:Sl?t TYIIE: SilnE fMmnn
sl?f, flIIIttR' vA-'ru
lollt8ss.' ,011
'fxng
n
APPL..ANT:
BurE sfi ToJErc III. uc
'oftH*1i'f*"3ffiffi,'o,
o6
z
P
IotF
a
€
@
-\
a
I
aJi;"<zz6IJ ronoooz0c@o'fIlItco0+>>:c'oo!nzooczoozoIIsIpCOJll o!;"-:\ .1n-3oN,Z- n,n 9 -!--!obcodzzi;;-oooz> '-=E<=Yo r.^6"6o34-2a^4dabhi>:m=t-Is:o{a:> <aixsJ 2n V!ra2foI ,"X,T,$I !,CzlooIt\I-lIIIII Jt2 9oU!4>z:JuH4voczI-I n=4>3-t:6!o:-;R.Poo;9>lo- 2A< a>o ozz?I i=2Ov26.qoEr ?ZN>fiHxI
\
\aflo9E?32ao>oo
dn3
@a '
',>6
Fp,-95
Iooo
..Fn.-!- -riir.r4.
), '.. ' ,t , -.'. j.
c-
a ,,,--,
:
tr-,:ra--,
@o^'Oyi,-<3\p j'!
I
oq
o
oz
to
-z-5
@o
6o
rz
Oi
o!
Oq
vo
o
I
Elo--\r
I
i...-
a
il
rl
rl
I
ro--No
F
E
4z
!
iu
o".
7?
o
* 3t,
:lg
F
z
t
z
I!oco
;;-
'!
<z
>-
5r-^Zz{5'yi F
=>^2;rS
?EF8
oQ
!a
Fo-*
o
€o
I
+
o
o
o
oc^z-r;-
oJn
o>-
eEg
o2o
Poo
i
I otu
6r
!
!
.Zomooo
o€!^
z
@<
II
1Pq:
ET!=^z_J
IzFda-cFa
:ra_
inq
42_
fr2z
l,i Tal
)z
in o
;Qz-
4?
o"!
4z
ifr o
zn
t-=>:-y
1,9 a
>fo
t2
a6o
-!cv
or
@F93
!
mFm
{
6z
o-c7oT
I
64c
- rij*
.i
.ii
oo
<o
?zoo
o<z1
@I
IT
69'+ q (F) PANEL ANTINNAS (BY OTHERS)
81'1 Q (F) PANEL ANTENNAS (BY OTHERS)
93,1 q (P) AT&T PANEL ANTENNAS
1o5.* q (P) T_MOBILE PANEL ANTENNAS
110'r TOP (P) CHURCH TOI/{ER 0NCLUDING FOUNDA'IION & ANCHOR BOLTS)
115'* TOP (P) CHURCH TOWER ROOF (HIGHEST APPURTENANCE)
a
:1:f .:-,I0,cozFoIaI.lIIIIJ rIIit+IF-0\=3o--go o+r-x olc-zoT--I !'ooo:@o2a1c2on
l1I r.!.I _-:Llil;-::--
IL.l
t-,:=, --r
-:i--
t-"--.-
1
| ':-:--
t_
ocz
a
{
6
>or
1"4 i
orlr
4hi
t<
Ot
fi'Bz
Pro-IerraDESIGN GROUP, LLCS!ite 200MA OIOJ5Ph: {4r 3)J20- 49lACONSUL IANISISTAMP:DATE: tl/x/2022DRAWN: BLM/STZCHECK: JMM,/TEJSCALEj SFE PLANSHEE'I |IILE:COMMUND PLAN& ELEVATIONzoaozicoofa;toz=IaozidoEoz=Loz=ooozLcoo!r\E; -(OEEH:EHEEqFIH6!':hLIc&i3HeRHEiE€HH$HEoJ>J(t-. Hgd rHftl o<t FJOB NO.: 17-O56A-4J15ZONEX(UNSHAITED)FEMA FLOOD(zoNE x)BOUNDARY{zoitEx(P)LE100 xr00'ASE AREA\'F) CARRIER LEASE(P) 55'x60 6 TALLSTOCKADE FENCEAREA, TYP.(SHADED)IAE_"&_.DD(P)WTHVEGETATED SWALEEROSION CONTROLBLANKET, TYP.\ GRADE VARIES\ rxcavartoru & PRIPARAIToN oFFOUNDAI'ON BASE & STRUCIURALBACKFILL IIIATERIAL SHALL BE INACCORDANCE WTH GEOTECHNICALRECOMIIENDATIONS (BY OTHERS)(P) RTINFORCFD CONCREIL .. -I OUNDAIION PI NDING RISULTSOF GEOTECHNICAL REPORTg'r ryt "** F"f** ** *.(P) TREE LINEI(P) UNDERGROUNDUTILITIESfN OTE:ONLY ONE SECTOR VIEW ISSHOWN FOR CLARITY. REFERTO SHEETS FOR CA-1 ANDCA_3 FOR CARRIER EQUIPIIENTAND lilOUNT DETAILS.---ri-::(P) i2" wr0EPEA GRAVELDiAPH R AG(,I(P) STONEC O[iPOUN DSURFACE(P) 6 H|GH SOUNDMITIGATION SHIELD,DESIGN A'/ OTHERS(P) T-NaOBtLE tO'x26'LEASE AREA WTHGROUND EOUIPMENT(P) NIETtR CENTERW/HoFFMAN BoX & lcECANOPY PROTECTION(AS REoutREo)(P) PAD [,iOUNTEoTRANSFORMERIil..,1:trit(P) T MOBILE RFEOUIPMENT BEHIND RFTRANSPAREN] SHROUD(P) AT&T RFE0UIPN/|ENT BEHIN0 RFTRANSPARENT SHROUD(F)(8YRF EOUIPIiENT3.IVIN. SEPARATION PROVIDED FORALTERNATE (F) 8,IALL ANTENNAS3'l',ilN SEPARATION PROVIoED FORALTTRNATE (F) 8.TALL ANTENNAS58.0'iPANELFACEozzFelAFIo=oev=FIoefxoooF+l_oF)oooIozddzotrzfooz6la=egoFIo&lIoIIoF+t'oCc(P) SCREENINGTR EISOTHERS). TYP14'I PANELFACE, TYPzzFzzdooIFd{1-oo' *'*zzFzzFddFItlit\t_ ...LIo62zzzI"i\)iIoozzzzc+b)FEN4A FLOOD (zONE AE)1OO YEAR FLOOD PLA1N ANOLAND SUBJECT TO COASTALSTORM FLOWAGE. ll' AtvlSL(ABOVE IVEAN SEA LEVEL)(P) 4,'SLOTTED PIPE ANDqTONE FOUNDATION ORAINTO OAYLIGHT \!ITH RIPRAPOUTLET PROTECTIONINV OtlT = T80sLoPE = 0.5% lvlN., i.. -::' .,t:l/:.., .,:.,:'\- l_.ry'*B(P) 12 wDEGRAVEL DRIVEWAY10.0(P) r-MOBTLE 500 GALLON LPTAN( ON 4'xl0' CONCRETE PAD(Nir)(P) ls' wDEACCESS EASIMENTTO PUBLIC R.O W(P) ss'x60'6'TALLSTOCKADE FENCE(P) AT&T (2) DC TRUNKLrNIS, (1) FTBER LINE,AND (]) INNERDUCT RUNWTHIN TOWER LEG(P) TOWER LEGo2.0'f, TYP.r. wrH 1c; rcc BRIDGE PRoTEcTloN.I.,lAINTAIN 1FR OI/FILL VALVE9.8(r,1E)////--110.0([1E)10.2(ME)_ __ (r,1E)(P) TREE LINEI8.O'1 TOTAL WDTH16'} q LEG IO q LEG(E)PARK]PAVEDNC LOTI(P)'N0 PARKING't',1ARK lN GS(P) INFILTRATION BASINWTH SEDIIilENT FOREBAY(PRETREATMEN T)ELEVATIONSCALE: l =lO (22t34)l =20 (llxl7)20Ia'NDr------1tltlF-(P) lo wlDEI UTILITY EASEMENTSCALE: IITOR.O.W.55l5(P) 6'[,iITlGASHIELO,OTHERSSOUNDHI CHTIONBYDESIGNL3.1ttL(P) CHURCHTOWERw/(F) CARRTERRF EOUIPMENTFG = 13.61IIL12.6rn(P) DOUBLE6' CATESt.tLJttttrltttttttttIIttllttllIIII)lltttttl!lrt lt rl llrr rr tt lt
ProTerraDESION GROUP' LLC48!i!ding Aisuiie 200MA 0r035Ph: (4rl)120- 49laCoNSUL IANTSiPLACE Allionce3? g@lh tl.oEit !t, tdlc ${lhh-l,lt^ 011tr2illt.alT.la6ilSJAMP;DAIE: 11/28/2022SCILEi sEE PLiNzooz=&dof,q)t>ozl:dIqoz=eL6\oztrt:&4Nl)IoFrsiEHEEiifl!prri>IiUtl.r=a:lqldtqEool.EPE=?tQE€ArnH$HH9>JYJU'-qH;HoFJOB NO.: 17-056sHfFT Tllll:PLAMINCPLANA-5DRAVIN: BLM/512CHECK: JMM/IEJ5J2I 4 ALAC( PLASTC HosLOAM & SETO ALL DISTURBIOAREAS OUTSIDE OF THTI@-NOll cA GALV SRE. COILIACH 6NO TICHTLY ALTOW fORAOEOUATT TRUNfi MO€MENT(P)S5:)'t6O 6 TALLTOCKADE FEI.ICECOMPOI]NO ANO DRIVEV/AY.STABILIZE WITH IROSIONCON'IROL tsLANKET.Pl.aslc HostENIAROEO Dt1AIL3-ClE!I48!EO-DI]ALDO NOI OAVAGE OR CUTLIADER2 T-BAflS 40 X 40 X 5 X 2500MMionc oulsrDt Rool SALL wrTri oNt oNSIOE S PREVALING SNDS (OPIIdAL}cRom or noor SALI sHAtL 8€ARi^ME RELATdSHIP To trNrsBEDMAD' AS 1T DIO IO FREVOUS CR OLoo NolIO RIJATN NAIURAL FORMIN.ilIR' ER NCH COLIAR3-VCTIIINSARKEO lnt[s $1THAT APpRO'RIATI lstD(o) ,oo'*too ---]I FASF AREA Iq'THI4C€OARSrAKtS 5'oN 5r0tONIY TOCALIPER)ONEOWR ENTIRI PLAN]IN6KEIP AWAY FROM TRUNKUSTDs(P) TREE LIN€OF1ERArS[0fD6tSAUCIRARdNOolROOIEALLPLANIING HOLI.UTH NAlw 50ltKIIPTRUN(.SAUCER AROUNDEALLI(P)MTH NAllw 50rLVECETATED S\liALEEROSION CONTROLBi.ANI([T, TYPJ-RNl2-tO[NrsflED&SETILINC. OO NOISINEAlH ROOT EAILTOP I/J OF BURLAP.dASKEI rROV ROOI BltlfxcAv TINlIqSri DO NO] DNA6E UAIN ROO]s OR OTSIROYNOOI OALL W{N INS]ALUNG IRIE STA(Tr wrien monoucntv AFIER lNsTAtl.Allsi RFiloE lRtE RrNGs AND sll(ts rrcYFaRs ^FI[R TNSTALLAnoN.r pnovnt ou,nece FoR Pl aNlN6 PII rF rNUPFR!ENL€ SOL,l arirnics MusT Bf raccto ND APPRowoBY CN5ULTAN1 STHIN 14 OAYS AtsILRENOEF CLO$NG.8&ts R@I AALL2_PIJNOIsu8 cRADf. IO Avolo SEITLINCEXCAVATI 8[N[AIH ROOI AALLNAIISTi nn Nnr nAMAGf VAil ROO]S OR OESIROYinni-nrir $ttN NSTALLTNG rRt[ sTA(L" iiiiip-ri?tpoucrrv AFTER rNSrAl LATioN'. niliir'lr tnce RrNGs ^ND sraKis lwo. f#$'JJ"I^lx3l^!bA''"1n;*''"0 "'' '' '"IUPFRMTAELE SOL, s .n*5*"_'; *1";o^i.;33i" ^lii$"*"IENOIR CLOSNG.c3'VTCTREE PI.ANTING DETAILSLOAII & SEED ALLDISlURBED AREASOUTSIOE OF THECOMPOUND ANDDRIVE\{'AY. STABILIZEWTH EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETorsASEOPSONE ONLY OAMAGID'ANO/OR trAK ARANCHISFNTSHID GnaDt aRouNo PL4!]-]otr frt s M€ a5 mlGlNAL Cx^uLPLANTING NO'IESI IHT SP'CI'ITD PLANTINC $AL! BE IXECUTEO TO IHE LIMITS SIOW ON THI ACCWPANNNGENIREHOLI4-ANO' i$i,[1{i$r'#i'1ff iH4m,sFH}ffsH'milliitl#1"*tiin'lFio#'%"'o' :iil,,i,tt.ihffi iiiFf, f ir:irfn"f i$.8'ffi !l,h:tt'iA'*illil!ij::]l -"ii.-ioii'rioi iii, GTAffiO sr&K wc. -si Bam RmT (pL^NTrNc oF s^RE RoOI PLANTS nLr;tlir!#i#q:Fi#;t[*i;i;i"il!rffi i--1ti::?hri':,,1,"':i']*.*Ti'::';fifiii;;-. iitiroiru rc ni o'oet'ris ivreG*ro 8Y "1HE NERrc^N NURSERY ^N0IANDSCAPE AssocrATlft" LATEST EDlrloN' ih#l*|f*i,Tl df*i.]{f{ir*[^nli#"iiittl'.'.sli'1ffiiffi !"t^{ff "J::'-AY ldf PROJECI OESI@ER5 PIANTING HLL 8q DELAYqO AS NTCOID TO ENSUIE PLANTING IS COVPLEI€D OURINC ORY- iriliriri iid-n.efini u.r occun rr rFozEN GrouND'iiiiii'f,'ili,b:ilil{iff"{#l!#'$#-ru[f^.#"tTr'ifli,tJ''-"'li'e] Ilr'i's^efi"r'7. sEEo ilLL 8E urx€D rN rHt-etcrF'!o^lo.Too".n*t ilr"€iti;r6l3,o':rti,itJt^;"ttrr"J^"t"t^=ii'.g'ft iibffi [qni':,"'t!]i lruif"R ti;."Jsxlf llt.Til l*i""1"""*l*lar.aN(ET 10 RI0UC€ IROS|oNA- ALL DUE CARE STL 8[ TAXTN DUR'NG IH€ SITE PREPARATION AND PLNTING MNK TO AVOOcovPAcroN oF sorLs',.{:frtn#t[t**i+$ffi ts*t,:'f'rff,nrt$$$$ffi '^'orfft "&?'F,tt,Ku8iT"r\',rq$l'ihtlf"t#rrNc REP.RT ro r't cq\sERv^IroN c*Mrs$sll. TilE glTlOAtlON AREA' OtflNEO lN rHf LAN0SCAPE PIAN SfAtt 9€ MdNTAlNfo A5 A NAIURAAREA IN Pf,RPITUIIY', .0la.,li*"f'T.,'?,".1r:"J^t[|) ii%| '"",,i3',!3'"?i9!1,? ii'r'l]'i]3'5";i"gHEPtliiLANDSCAPE MAINTENANCEt, ANNUAL LANDSCAFE MAIN]INANCI MAY B€ RIOUIRIO 1O CONTROL UNOESIREO AND INVASIW' l-'#.'.ii;''5;-*-.-t ne:gfi r*iF.siil*.gf:i1,.$%l'AJxi fi[1,il^J$'9t#'^,if"YFAR frIS iNSPTCTION SHOUID INCLUOLrnAorcAroN of Ny wtos. rrvns'w ",onri-&--vduurorgen" prerls rHAI MAY sPRouTI iii"lg*#'*tili'ts*Jll#"tlg?'iY'[?#[!""1'"ifl?%'./o\.SAUCSR Af,OUNO ROOT BATL4-MPSIH NATIVI sOL(P) ORAINAGE -=-/EASTI'IENI ,,2-r0.AEFFULTY RIMOVE IOP I/] OFi,'niap m cmterltn {lF CSTAINERiirb"- oncmrc Rtqow coMPLtItLY).[r swR^r Alls lN mG Nlci6rrrurrn ro rAcrllTAlf RooTPfN€IRATISBB(P) BARI( }'IULCH(P) IREE LINEo^nl'o1TREESIII.,1\NOIFS:I. WATTR INdOUGILY AFTER INS1ATLATION't r^p praNllNG 8!0 INSIALLAIION CXCAV TT tNTrR[i"n"'rj eiD ,is -sqits\ or pnorrcr otrurucs(E) FAVEDPARXING I.OTr1_lP) l5'\!lDI)iicrss eescvt-NrTO PUBLIC R,O.W.(P) IO \lrDtutiurv ensEvErurTO PUBLiC R.O.W.NOI IOa"scat€ilo'1 -201.0'BOTTOMSEE PLANFINISHEDGRADESEt PLAN4..TOPSOIL. FERIILIZT AND SIEO SIDE SLOPES ANO BOTTOM WITH NEW-ENCLANDenosioru-cti*rcor7 REsToRATToN Mlx roR DETENTToN BASTNS &.MorsT sllEsBy NEW ENGLANo WEtlnuo preNls, '*c on eppnoveo EouAL (1LBS'/r250 SF)2Ifdm'tIIIIIIIL(P) sroNECOMPOUNO/-l\@IlL__*r--r-----')3-Rtit0PLANT LIST$zt (MlNlruM)NAUEcouvd NAVESYUAor1RTE5 _ €WRGREEN66. TO A, TALLchomoccFo'is thFidcsA{onlic {hil. CedorCI46TOro86. TO A, TALLLANDSCAPE 5I1RU8S6I' TO 4 HGTRhodod.ndt0n doximldRoscboy Rhododend.on5TO 4.HGlNAlrwaJ' lo 4 HcIvoccinium corrbos0d8NATIVE3'TO 1'HGT7TO 4 HCTNAlIVEJ' TO 4' HGTN lrw2t1TOINSE5
REVISIONS
ISSIIFO FOR PERMITTING
PFRMITTINS REVISED
PFRMITTING REVSED
PFRMITT]NG REVSEO
PERM TTING REVISE}
PFRMITTING RTVISED
DATENO
l
2
3
Ir
!
z
FF.l{ ta
LH
BH
e
f2
a
0
d
:\
^\
lb
l3
"r&
slfr flnaBfR ya-5r01
IDTRESSi ,011 HXEE n
sdnr Ynwnn, rA 0ff,u
APPLICANf:
aWE SKt 7ur8x5 AI, Ut
BLUE Slry. _3',#;r#"o"
TOWERS lll, LLC"N6Hh'iiumrc, ra otr,1
h)lo
16
lr
lz
l!4
E
m
@
oz
o
Ioc
-!-a
-u
0
-Jo'.T
-g)
€.>
o
@
zI
i
Io@
mIJ
F
u
1_'
a
-
:
FI 2 o{2oml-m-{6z<"ioooIon1zIoAEoq!z o:a -i._-1:5'RooEIOP (P) CHURCH rrcwER(HICHEST APPURTENANCE)l=4><n@ -€ ooir' v!^:!>o?:>,it@o
100
10.2r J.6010 110.01t or 1.512.42----7577111.7
NGooo
q
iP
D
vERlrcA!
^
o@4@i8
"l]fifl'tf,
1
-ffit I
N
l"
i
I
I
It-l+o
(!
-l
I
o
3t,{2o
mrm
-{6z
\jC'L+oIo+I+oo+oo+o
(!o
I
I
-l
O N
O
N
OO
a
l
o o
T
l4
7.r
zf.
4=lc
_Ltrzm
- 1-F00
4
6:
o !,
2-rEz<
(o!
I
+
o
o+
I
+
o+
o+
+(,oOO
u,{2o
m|-m
E6z
I
?
d6.
-xion
az
n
-
o
z
o
a
zo
o
L
oa
v4
1
o
Et
2
zo
+
i.
!^
7
ooo
n
ooo
o
zo
c
@
o
o
c€
o
=-
z
@o
z
l
!
I
9-7
9.i
9.9
1??
14 A2
t1
13.4
a
O
ProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLCS!il. 200MA Olol5Ph: {4r l)l2o- 49lAco_!Lsu__r.-TANIS:STAMP:8.DATE: 11/28/2022SCALEi SFf P/:ANSHEET TITLE:DETAIIS2IoI"ltozacFEEiE,:iilFlE8nh1EHEHUFSHilHEoJ>JY=io-ttl/,l3 egst o<r FJOB NO.: 17-O56D-lORA{IN: BLM/STZCHECK: .tMM/lEJIil lJlllL]U2J6x6 PT wO00 OR 3 5"O.D. SCH40 MIlAL POSTSw/cAPS, 8'O.C., MAx.4- rHrcK ([ilN.) 3/4" CLEAN WASTIFD SrONFLsivlii, "n'ss'oor M2o1.4' oR ^PPRovLD EouAt)ifii;-6;;'')"-ours,or or FENCTNG To LoGE or or^PHRAGM)'rE oPENING 12'-0"MIRAFI FIITER FABRIC 14ONOR APPROVED EOUAL(VTRIFY WTH4" O.D. SCH4O GALVSTEEL PIPEw/c.AP ('l'H)SITE PLANDf #2 CEDAR oR '/VOODsrlis. srltru oR sEAl CREYTO PROT€CT FROM ELEMTNTS\2REMOVE (I) TOP SOIL & SUBSOIL' REPLACEWTN CTEEN STRUCTURAL FILL INaCCORDANCT WTts RIICOMMENDAI|ONS*irnlnr cEorecntu'coL REPoRI (BY or'rERS)GATE KEEPERCASTHINGESTEEL GALV.ASSEMBLY.4 PLLOCKABLE LAlCHASSEMBLYCROWN OR PIICHAS NOTED ON PLAN4Z4.'THICK SURFACE COURSE OFI'Il2,' DENSE CRADE CRUSIIEOSTONE OR HARDPACK GRAVEL I-OR>7 5z sloPts (MAss DoT M2 ol 1)''i ::([) PARTNT MATERIAL,i{ooF RoLLED suB-GRADt12'' THICK GRAVEL SUBEASE(MASS DOT Ml O3.O IYPE B)GIOTIXIILE REINFORCEMENTAS RTOUIREO OVER ITEAKSUBBASEsuFXISTINC PROOT-ROLLEO SUBGRADE. BANKRUN GRAVEL OVER PAREN' MATERIALNdEHORIZONTAL CROSScaGATE ASSIMBLYvrlTri GALV.5IIEL PIPEFRAME (IN9DE)NO]ES:iifi cnotu.on MATERTALs sHALL Bt coMPAcTED To 95tz MAxlMuM DRY DEI{slTYBY S'TD, PROCTOR METHODz. i.Ltui ilro iiri iicees 10 Bt covtRED wrH ruTE MESH ERosloN coNrRoL- einNiirs ,lruozon svoRosetoeo wiTH N[w ENGLANfJ ROADSIoL MAlRlx Mix AT35LBS PER ACRE OR EOUAL.. iiiituriowriln r! rrlrencrprro. A SUBDRAIN OUILITTED To DAYLTGTTT SHALL Bt' iirdririiri. Contaci Euctruern FoR sullABLE oETATLMEMBER (INSIDE). 3 PL.25OO PSI CONCRETE12"o, rYP.(CONCRETE REOUIREDFOR METAL POSTS ONL6"0 SCH40 c.s. PIPE.FILL WTH CONCRE]E(Ar 4oo0 PSI)6"gxl8" DEEP CONC.FOOTTNG WlH 1 1/4" ptPESI-EEVE,6.'Lcr8 d. 2 PL.cICONCRETT REQUIREOioR uErar PosTS oNLY)GRADEDR5CAtt:4'' (MIN ) COMPAC]LD OEPTH OT TOPSOIL' FERiILIZE' '" ii'Lrur rx rCconolruct wrH sPtclllcArroNsNEW INGLANO EROSIONcoNTROLi/ RISToRATION MIXFOR DRY SITTS 8Y NEWTNGLANO \,I€TLAND PLANTS.INC. OR APPROVED EOUAL(rLBS/I2s0 sF)INFILIRA1ION BASIN SIDE SLOPES AND SEDIMENTFoaFRAY SHALI HAVF 4'' (MIN ) ]OPSOIL WI]H AT.iaii rz onoalrcs. tnrtrinrtioN BAsrN BorToMiiiali *evL A FREE DRATNING sANDY LoAM sorLiinirirze eruo sEEo stDE sLoPEs AND BoTToM wTHNir! INGLAND ERostoN coNTRoL/REsloRAlloN Mlx FoRiiiiirurioru e^sirus a vorsr slTEs BY NEw ENGLAND-*iiirinin pr-rruJs. rNc. oR ^PPRoVED EouAt PRovlDtirioirbf conrcoL BLANKE] toR sTABIrzA'tloNt8"oFLEXTIRRA FGM HYDRAULICALLYAPPIIFO MIJLCH & LROSION CONTROLRI ANXET MANUTACTURED BY PROFILFPRODUCIS, LLC BUFFALO GROVT,. IL.SEE TABLF FOR APPLICATION RATES5C LE:FI EXTERRA APPI ICATIONRAT[SSLOPERATTLISS TBAN 4'I25OO LB/^C4: I IO 3:13000 LBIACJ:1 TO 2r I3500 LBIAC2:1 TO l:14ooo LB/AC5. WOE EMERGENCY OVERFLOWSPILLWAY SHEARFORCT_ 1O TURFREINFORCEMENT IVAITOP OF BERM ELEV=9 00SPILLWAY fLEv=7 70r 5"fSCARIFY SURfACEOF SUEGRADE 102.'DEPTHSEDIMTNTTOREEAYELEV=7.75Bv=8.5RUNOFFtsY APPLIED MULCH BLANKETOR DOUBLE STRAWCONTROL BLANKElTYPE EROS'ONBEUTILIZEDA5z={3/4" lO t-1/2 SURFACE STONEluass oot M2.o1.1, M2.Ol 2 M20l 3,[i2.OI 4, OR APPROVED EOUAL)+ RUNoFFIMPERVIOUS CORF. [4ATERIAL!{IH PERMEABILITY LESS THANI1 o^(-5lCMlsrc)ENTIRETHROUGHOUTBASIN 8[RM---r-IBASEO ON,.SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION JREPORT'' PREPARED BY ]OWERENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS' INC'DA1ED JULY 2' 202I.SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER=J'2'erLow (r) GRAOE (ELEV. 4 Aa AMSL)MIRAFI 14ONFILTER FABRIC ORAPPROVED EOUALf,/a" D0u8LE WASrlEoPEA CRAVEL(MASS DOT M2.01.6bn leecovro tount;BASINONEh- 12." ----|.DOES NOT INCLUDE FCCRTGULA-TED SIGNAGE PER THECARRIERS FEDERAL LICENSE.NO'E:Fii-CNAWI DIAPHRAGV SHALL BE INSTALLEDa-norrrun obtaNHrrr SIDE oF rENctD colvlPouNoPEAEXISTINGUNOISTURBEDSUBGRADEthtt "ta rt ow'd ttd N4rcd bYttsotkY toetF hrtt on, trLC'Fot lntowatlot on laatta or,tta acett, ttten &Deact ta tct(0r!) tao/rttl o!lnto@tludtyaow€Econw.thallqrto?.&coHNo TrocPamingPrlot ruthortr'tlon roqutred'vlohton vlll b. lrelsotcd to th! tullst €xttnt ol thr lrv'l:i:nb"St YTower,PBST Sltc:SOUTHYARilOUTHMA.5104FCC TowerID! N/ASCALE:EMERGENCY
PreTerraDESIGN GROUP' LLC4 8oY RoodBuitdino A:$il€ 7OOHo;r.e MA ol0l5Ph: (4lJ}J2O-4914coNsul IA&It.SfAMP:$tDAIE: 11/28/2022SCALEi SEf PLANSHEET IIILE:CO.APPUCAMDETAIIS2otEaouz=cNFeozLo-oEzlsAlit:-l-llEIFIclsl!t=tal4lt*$ozo"l-lErslEHEEi.lFIi8*O--IEHEBE€3H;HE(t*j. q&3;H$t o<l l-.tog NO.: 17-056cA-1DRAYIN: qLM/SIZ'HECK: JMM/IEJ2CO.APPLICANT INFORMATIONlF "Mobile'SITE NUMBER: 4r1Y0604H]-MOEILE NORTHEAST. LLC15 COMMERCE WAYSUITE BNORTON. MA 02766T-1III(P) ICT BRIDGEWTH RF CABLESD(P)or.rPROPANE CENERATOR4'x10'CONCRITE PADY,illHlN 9'xl5' LEASE AREA(REMOIT TMERGENCYorscor'irurcr REOUIRED FOR> 2OXVA CENERATOR)-lEOTJIPMEN'T SIZE ANONUMBER SHALL BECONFIRMEO W]TH FINALRF OESIGN./P) 8'x14'bo'rucnEtt pnol' (coNcRETE PAD)(P) 6.I{IGH SOUNDMiTtcATroN sHtELo.DESICN BY OTIjERS+J,(IEASE AREA)6PS ANTENNA:____JREMO]E RADIO HEAD:ERICSSON 4480 B7l+885:2l.E"Ht x 157"Wt x 7.5"01ERICSSON 4450 825+8661l9.6"Ht x 15.7"wi x l2.l"Dt5"H t f.2"0II-______J(P) CABINET. TYP.(P) UNDERGROUNDUTILITIESPANIL ANTENNASJiRlcssoN AlR6449 8al:33.r"Hr X 20.5"$/t x 8.5"01ERTCSSON E40590966 (OCrO):95.9"Ht x 23.l"wt x 7.1"01L(P) GPS ANTEI'INAIJN ICE BRIOGfANTENNANONEGROUND EOUIPMENToPI.ANSCAL€:POS1 CAPSECTOR AGRIP 51RUT ICTPROTECTION(P) CHURCH TOWERBICE BRIDOE KIT POSTSSFACED A._O.,MAX-3 LEVEL ANCLEBRACKET TRAPEZERRU, TYP. OT 2 PERsEclOR (6 TOT^L)'PIPT_MOUNTEO BEHIND RTTRANSPARENT MAlERIALCTORANCHORSECTOR GsIBCONCRE-TE PADPANEL AN'TENNA, TYP, OF 2PtR SECTOR (6 TOTAL).PIPE_MOUNTTO BEHIND RFTRANSPARENT MATERIALALTERNATEANCHORING DE]AII,CONCRETEFOo ttN0SCAtt: l -5o2NONE
ProTerraDESIGN GROUP. LLCAulding AiSuile 2mMA 010f,5Ph: (413)120-4914coNstjllAdlgSTAMP:$tDAIE: tt/28/2022SCALE| SFf PLANSHEET ilTLE:CO-APPLICAMDWAIISoLozEEiEEFIs{F.EEIRLxuth:tati1zl<lilIt{l66olu3JoJOB NQ: 17-056cN2DRAVN: ELM/STZCTIECK: JLIM/IEJ5236KW PROPANE CENERATORON 4'xI0 CONCRETE PADMODELRBS 6102MANUFACTURERERTCSSONWOTH51.2"DEPTH27.6"HEIGHT5"1.1WBGHI (t{lrHouTgATT€RIES)728 LBS.DDPLANLATTACH RBS CABINE'ITO BASE FRAM€ PERMANUFACTURER,SGUIOELIN€SMODEL3799340400MANUFACTURERDELlAWDIH20'DEP'THr0'HEIGH-I40'WEIGHT75 LBs.RAS BASE FRAME (DIMENSIONS lBD).ANCHOR TO CONCRETE PAD PERMANUFACTURER'S GUIOTUNESPOWER PROTECTIONEOUTPMENTCABINETCABINETGROUND TANK PER NFPA 54,pipl sa eHo MAssAcHUsEfisFUEL GAS CODEPROPANE FILLIOUILET PORTMAINTAIN IO. MINIMUM CI-EARANCtFROM IGNITION SOURCE5OO GALLON PROPANE IANKl.j-r'f,w x 9.9'iL x 3.8'tH).iiruft ott',lEt'tst0tls BASED oNrlrur uAtrUFrrCtURER PROVIDEoBY PROPANE TANK SUPPLIER'gBMAINTAIN MINIMUMNEC_COMPLIANT WORXSPACECLEARANCE JO" WDE, ]6-DEEP. 6'-6" IiEIGHTCASI.IN.PLACECONCRE]E PADMODELRAC-24MANUFACTURERPURCELL\{!DTH25.4"DEPTH20.0"HEIGHT24.O"WTH(37.1"PLINTH$rErGH t85 LBS.f,88 LBS.(tMPTY)(MAx.)' ttt,,| ,fr'=rl .-g=r' trtMODELDUBBM- 2ALMMANUFACTURERMfS OATA SERVICESWOTH28.54"DEPTH28-54"HETGH1 (1 UNlr)29-67"HEIGH1 (J UNTS]89.01SIDT FRONIBATTERY BACK.UPPlt gp:.r-: ^:tlsl*J'":l3ltf#, J'li,o[iHil;,$',1*;l#1ilJ' on.'ffi {:$gtiJTJlr,"f 't[:i.gtJs'-yJi'-{ll{"*":'":l'^"^.z ilfdtoi icien,oor Fnbrecnorl ovER ,NIET/FILL vALvE As REoUTREDCABINETPURCELL CABINET5CO.APPLICANT INFORMATION{F "Mobile'SITE NUMBER: 4HY0604HT_MOSILE NORTHEAST. LLCI5 COMMERCE WAYSIJITE BNORTON, MA 02766FRON'T6acA-2ncA-2NONE
ProTerraDESIGN GROUP' LLCsuil. 200MA 0r015Ph: (41f,)J?O-4914CONSUL IAi! 15:STAMP:$-.DA'IE: 11/28/2022oRAw: BLM/sTzSCALE: sEF PLAN<HFFf IITLE:CO-APPLICAMDETAIISzotvoErsiEHEEiltsltrlsgE.:su1EHEBF:THUHEI*jtu:fJ6*lrls2ldl<lJaB No.: 17-O56cA-3CHECK: JMU/'IFJaoooffiffi52SECIOR APANEL ANTENNA. TYP. OF 2PER SECIOR (6 TOTAL).PIPE-MOUNTED EEHIND RF]RANSPARENT M -TERIAL(P) cHURcH Tol\,ER3'MlN.Dt)RIFER -fO CURRENTRFDS FOR RFEOUIPMENT SPECIFICSTOPSECIOR Gr.* r-n-WUSURCE SUPPRESSORT18.2"11i x 10.2"4W x 31 4"10SECTOR B/-i\ RRU,tAt (12 ToTAL)'TYP. OF 4 PER SECTORPIPE-MOUNTTD BEHINOTRANSPARENT MA'TERIALo\gPIPE-MOUNTED+SURGESUPPRESSOR.FRONT S|DEREMOIE RADIO HfAD:18.1"*H x 13.4"1W x 82"tDl6.5"tH x 13.4"iW x 5.9':iOr7.9"tH X 13.1"+W X 9.4"10l4.g"tH x 13.2"tW r 1O9"+DTYP. Of 2GPS ANTINNAI5"tll x 3.2"10CPANEL ANTTNNA:71.2"tt1 x 21.0"1W x 78"1071.2'tH x 2O]"!\! t'1'7"tDcNStoGROUND TANK PER NFPA 54,NFPA 58 AND MASSACHUSETTSFUEL GAS CODEPOST CAP5OO GALLON PROPANE TANK(f.l'tW x 9.9'tL x 3.8'rH)'irrulr DrMElstotrs BASED oNlANK MANUFACTURER PROVIDEDBY PROPANE TANK SUPPLIER'24CRIP STRUT ICEPROTICTIONPROPANE TILLIOUTLET PORTMAINTAIN IO' MINIMUM CLEARANCEFROV IGNIIION SOURCEBCAST_IN-PLACECONCREIE PAOf, LEVEL ANGLEBRACKET IRAPEZEICT BRIDGE KIl POSTSsPACE0 8'-0" MAXLANCHORCONCRETEFlIifu ,*ooo*, sys'rEM IS sHowN oN IHts oRAwNG As-A sclltMATlc .NLY' ii i,,cr*"deo cei irrien snrll oBTAIN ^LL REoUIRED PERMTT-s ANDlroNiinJii rtr accononxct wlH THE uTlLlTY PURVEYoR ANDieliacilsrrrs FUEL cAS coDE As NEcEss^RYz paov,or rci enroce pRoTEcrloN ovER INLEI,/FILL vALVE As REoulREt)ALTERNAIEa.trero8lN!--DglalLCONCRET€FOOTINGPAD52CGAPPLICANT INFORMATIONgSlTt NUMBER: MA 5104NEW CINCULAR WRELESS PCS. LLCt$tl2*'uo', ,oooFRAMINGHAM. MA 01701at&tcA- 3NONEON
ProTerraDESIGN GROUP' LLCEuilding A:Suile 200vA OIOJ5Ph: (al 3)320-a9laCONSUL IANIS:SfAMP:8.DATE: 11/28/2022SCALE: SEE PI-ANCO-APPUCAMDETAII.Szo6ozF.EEiEqEIi€EhlEHBB!83$ilHE(tJ*,jlu:)J6!l3FI<lJoA NO.: 17-O56SHffI lltEicA-4DRAWN: BLM/SIZCIIECK: JMM,/TEJ52Dt)External Dimensions.80"x80"x113'lnternal Dimensions.72'x72"x105'NEQ 19737 ( includes below)cc(P) 6-8"*6'S VJALK-lNrour'putli cABlNEl ON (P)8'-8'txl I'-O"l CONCRETEPAD OR COI{CRETE PIERS\(P) HVAC UNITIsI(P) OC EREAKERBOXINTEGRA'TTO SHUTOFF(AS REOUIREo)FI5KW ENCLOSIDPROPANE GENERAlOR(P) 6 H|GH SOUNDMI]IGATION SHIELD,DESI6N 8Y OTHERSr--1--------tIjl(LEASE AREA)I'(c0NcR€ TE)ANCHOR TO CONCRETE PAO PERMANUFACTURER.S GUIDELINESB.P\ AT&T PROPANEciruLnrron oru a'"0'COI{CRETE PAOro lvllN. TOBUILDINGPIN€lRATIONS& MECHANICALINTAKESISOMETRIC VEVIB(P) AT&I 250 sFLEASI AREAIP) AUTOMATICinririren swtcl-tWTH 3'CLEAR^NCE(P) PPC WTHJ' CLEARANCT_TiII9OSovriI3rlrlIjl.t\\IIl./, ---r--IIIII(t.oiEl)$rcFlHgGHI{I13{r;iP) RI CABLINC RUNnlcilrc tct BRroGt roIOWER/4\ (P) rcE BRID6E wTHL.:- GPS ANTENNAq7r trlrl(P) DTRECT AIRcooLil'rG (OAC)I,iItiF86{,no, jl:rinlI 0?3rrDlli.l- l3soli0l6nrD .....- ........-lr(inl!345nw{ll;n1iSjnlPIANN^IF' 6'-8.. X 6'_8" TOUIPMLNT SHELTIR FOR AT&1 WRTLESSdidvices e'v vrnrrv siowl: vERIFY MAKE AND MoDLL wrH6b,niiri,ici,brn "n*AoER pRloR ro coMMENCEMENT or coNsTRUcTloNEND VIEW" GROUND EOUIPMENT5$MARTMODDRAWIilGGONFIGURATIOI{UE - PRODUGTNET * AS$EMBLYIH CABI6X6WALKCO.APPLICANTINFORMATIONg,at&tvr'SlTt NUMBER; MA-5104NFW CINCULAR WREI.ESS PCS. LLCt"AT&T )iso co6rlruarE noaoTRAMINGHAM, MA 01701g+; venr,val'=6'2NON€S}DE VIEW
EROSION CONTROL NOTES5ProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC8lildinq AiSuilc 200MA OIOJ5Ph: (1r3)320_ 1918CONSUL IAN TSTS'TAMP:s.dDATE: 1t//28//2022SCALEi Sff PLAN<HFFI TIILE.PLAN E DETAIIAzo'l ll!lslslElgliI;IEIEuls l>dIFIFlil&lFt!\\tffil;I-o2.l-l'Elg5EHEEFI:c--lEHE*E€3HilHEoJplo-ur3Jo:l6ldEC-1DRAIIIN: BLM/STZCHECK: JMM//TEJJOB NO.: 17-0561 AFPLICANT PROPOSTS IO CONSTRUCT A CLLLULAR' ilii;iliruti;;riors rrcririv coNsrsTrNG 0F A FENceD-cbil;oJii; ANii uirrrrv wonx wftrN A LEAsE AREA ANoEASEMENlS., TFMPORARY SILT FENCI TROSION CONTROL BARRIER' lilll i'iii "nlrure'rto tnnoucHour srTE coNsTRUcTroNii&i FnE oN srTt loo FT oF sttl ILNCE FoR -ivEiieitci use rer,lponenv ERostoN EARRIERS SFIALL^hiirirq'ii pir,ie unttr prnltlruErur vEGETATTvE GRouNoCOVER 15 ESTABLISHED.1 TFIF CONTRACTOR SHALL CHIP AIL SRUSH AND SLASH" .iiitiruis iirn siii eruo srocxplrc lHt cHlPs l0 BE::;; X; ;i' irruiranrr DrsrURBE0 AREAS ouRlNGidi,iriuciioin-ri irrunbeacv srABtLrz^lroN MULCH NoBUNUINC WTL 8E ALLOWED ON SITE,1 IFTTPORARY STAEILIZAlION I\'IUs'I 8E PROVIDED TO NNY" oiiiu"na'io rARi;-lHAT ls oPENED uP lN ANY oNE ^lbtiiior,"roii uonE THAN 14 DAYS cHIPS FRoM L^ND;ii;niNC eCosron corurcor BLANKLTS, oR FAsT-.-..ih?iiinfnii cnnssls r''rev ee usro FoR TrMPoRARYSTABILIZATION AS REOUIREO'5 S.IRIPPED TOPSOIL SHALL 8L STOCKNILED AND PROTTCTED" i,iiil siFnw ruulaH. AtL slocKPllEs SHALL HAVI ANiirph,iriio si-raroi{ e;nnten ToTALLY suRRouNDrNG -TrE6i'i.'iir?: eiG snaLL BE rN AN APPRovED UPLAND-AR[Al'lli",iiiiv b? r"wEiiiv-irvr FEEI FRoM Atr RFsouRcLAREAS,A lHF PHASING ANO STOUENCING OT ]HE WORK FOR THE" ii?i inipirnnriot.l ron ruE IELLCorvlMUNrcAnoNsiiiirpJi"ri ir.rittLLnitor consrsrs oF rNsTAl trNGiirii;oiaiiv inosioN AND sEDIMENTATIoN coN TRor, - -eilhiEi's' cieARNC rr'ro noucr GRAITING As N[ED['D;i<jir'iib'nr'bru tioi*,' ExcAv^TroN FoR uTlLrn[si B^cK rrltiXiliibiii5iis iNo unritv tntNcFjcs; FtNctD coMPouND^XLii"',liinru' rNsrAirATroN or TowER AND GRouNl)iXii'""iii-m inoulrDrNc AND LIGHINING PRoTtcTroN; -Eili'ilii,ii riiirric; riurL cRADrNc AND slABrLrzATroN -il'^'iil'Jern anrns, roeu AND stEo DTSTURBEO AREASXi''iliiioupouro, itrueL crEeruup THL ESTIMAILDY'itl"ion-covFLetion or rsr lvoRK ls APpRoxrM^TELYTwELvE (12) trtEEKs.7 TBf coMPouND TNCLOSURE lS SUnFACED WIH CR-USllEj)' iibri"ii',ocniori 6i-r wero-erocK sYNlHrrrc FTLTERiiEiih"ii[oinaCc FatrEnns' RUNoFF voLuMES ANDbilii;Low nrris wLl NoT BE ALTERED BY THEPROPOSED CONS]RUCTION.A. ALL DISTURBTD AREAS OUTSIDE IHE LIMITS OT THT" Fii,c?o ioviouND sHALL 8L PTRMANENTLY tsrABLrsHEo*r'i'rie" 'i'oiii,ineceiarrrt cnouno covER AT THt"^*iii's'or oF coNSTRUcTtoN. cRADEo AREAs sHALL BtEiiiiriieo wnl sTR^w MULCH uNlll A G0o0\€GE]ATIVE COWR IS ESTABLISHED.9. THE TOTAL IMPACT AREA OF THE DISTURBED" ioisinucloru sirt ls eouNut.o BY THE 'LrMrT oF. yqqf:Xi''drioii iihiotl-. tHe uexlutuu AREA or DISTURB-ANcEfiirn'ii'i-iii lii,:'i or wbnx ts APPRoxiMATtLY r0's50 -iiiuiie"rEer. i"r ono.rrct tuprcr AREA ls Btlow THEiiiir'pririri-riintsnolo oF 43,560 souARf FEEI lN-40--liF'"b,rir]s's,'iiz-lia eno tsrnEroHr rs Nor suBJEcliii'nidiiLnrtiN ur'roen rss EPA NPDEs GENERAICONSlRUCTION FERMiT PROGRAM1^ rHF peo.[c{ owNtRS GENERAL coNTRAcToR SHAU" ;oirriJ;1-;i; iiiioevrt-opvert woRK rN A MANNER -iiii"oorinoi ixcrEo rHl LrrilrTS oF woRK srrowN oNitii piirui ADDITToNALLY, THE PRoJECT owNER'sCerurRal corurnncroR sHALL coNDUcT ALLEb'nEiiiirciion airruI'FS rN A MANNI-R THAT Dots-NorXiir',.i 'ri sion"i wAtER DlsolARcEs wTH AN AovERsEiir-pici oir arui REsouRcE AREAs oR DovrNsrREAMPROPER'TIES.' upoN coMpLETtoN oF tHE PRoJEcr. THE CoNIRACT-OR" iirii L ntr,,rove ALL AccuMULAlrD slLT FRoM BEHINDiiiiniroli eAdnitRs ANo olsPosE of slLt EVENLY rN.--ilF l ir,ii intiii"nl,',dvi er-i Enost oru coN TRoL DE vrccsilirlN'i Cooo v.ceTATlvE covER Is ESTABLTSHED]? A CONCRETE WASIIOU] AREA SHALL BT INSTALLED PRIOf' ?o"ii'ii coiciiEit-prncrrurr'rl oN THrs PRoJEcr' srGNStioli ei"Pi;a:cD rs xrcessnnv ro cLTARLY rNDlcATtii-ii''i"iiriol bT THE coNcR[TE wAsHouT wAsHouT,li:i'niii iuaLr BE REMovED FRoM THE slrr ANDdispoiEo or AT AN APPRovto wAsrt srrE'Dcalli -. ,,(E) WOODEDAREA(P) CONCRETEWASHOUT PITROUTE 28?*ffiffi#*tft#"ENTRANCE SHALL BT INSTALLEOPRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OFEARTH MOVING OPERATIONS'2 CONSTRUCIION ENTRANCE TO- AF MAINTAINTO UNTIL RFMOVED'-1(E) PAVEDPARKING LOT(P) EROSION CONlRoLB^RRIER ALOI{G OOWNHILLSIDE OF LIIJIT OF IVORI{:]Ia'EROSIONl'=20l -4OSTAKEO STRAWBALESt-t'i'\il\scTREE(P)LINE,TYPR=15' MlN.IIIIIIIID?I(P) rNLElPROTECTIONO{:liiIIJ\, fl\,\rrl(P) |NLEI -PROTECTION'aGEOTEXT|LE TABRICUNOER CRAVELffitroare\ l(,/ftttdIRT;I+] :'tr- Iltl12" MIN. THICKNESSFttr L W0Tl-l oFINGRfSS/EGRESS AREATE(E) UltLlTYPOLE, TYP(E) wooDEDAREA/\,lr(P)BASIN.DEWAIERINGIf REOUIR€D(P)e' io a'---lINSER'IRTBARf1l-/-t\@ta8' T0 r0'BRACKETS(J,+REINFORCEOro oz PVCINSTRT STAPLES^ROUND REEARI _BRACKEISc(P) DRAINAGfEASEMENTNOTES:'itfr corucRtrt wASHour AntA srrALL BE INSTALLED PRIoR To ANYCOIICNTTT PLACFN{[NT ON THIS PROJECT., iii*i'ir.iii'eE pirceo ns NFcEssARY To cltARLY TNDIcATE THEI OCATION OF TH€ CONCRETE WASHOUT':r ?ii'ibl'cn'erE wriiour enEa wtr ee nrpLaceo AS NEcESSAR.Y-To' nioiruin'n-cipociii ron wasrc CoNcnere AND orHER Llo-ulo wa^s^TE. illilolji t'rsio-ui ssir.L er nrMovEo FRoM THE sr'IE AND DlsPosED oFAT AN APPRO\dD WASTE SITE.s iio 'r.i'or'uix Eic?ss arsoururs oF FRESH coNcRflt oR CEME-NT.oN-sllE';. fi iioi ilisrl"oui-coruCCErr riucii lNTo sToRM DRATNS oPEN DTTCHESS]REETS, OR STREAMS.r i'ioii'riLr'rl;iruc eiciis corcnrrr lN NoN-oESrcNArED ouMPrNG AREASa. .diejJ wesnouT AREA AT LEAsr 50 (1s METERS) rRoM sToRM DRATNS'OPEN DITCI{TS. OR WATERBODITJ9. WASH ouT wAstes INTo ,", oJi"o"* wASHour AS sHow{-wH^ERE THt' iSru-iniru iii.i iir. sr enortN up, AND rHEN DrsPostD 0F PRoPTRLY4\ (P) ERosloN cor'lTRoLL-il eecntcn ALoNc oowNHrLL\[-/ stDE oF LIMIT oF woRK(E) PAVEDPARKING LOT(E) 1REE UNE,TYPSET BAG ON FILTER FABRICIF VEGETATION IS ABSEN]'CLAMPSTAKESPUMP DISCIIARCE HOSE(E) PAVEDPARl<ING LOT(P) 'NLEIPR0TECTIOI'lSCATE:IIIIIIIIIt..IBMIRAFI PREFABRICATED SIL] FEN-CEOR APPROVEO EOU L, INs;ALLLUPER MANUFACIURER.S GUIOELINESTI,YOBALEtMrN ) 1"x]"xJ' WOOD STAKES PtR'onrvrr tz' (MlN.) lNTo GRAoESTAKED STRAW BALES END_IO-T'NDNSTALL ONE BALE PERPTNDICULARio rtpcr rrNe PER FACH 50 LINLARFEET OF BARRIER,SPOIL FROMBALE 1RENCH2..HEADWDTH IVOODENSTAKES PLACED 6.0.C.FTLTREXX SILT SOXX (8",9".or 12" TYPICAL.) OR EOUALAREA TO BEPROTECTEDBLowN,/PLACEOFILTER MEDIAWORK AREA48" WOOD POSTS6'MAX. o.c.eeolEcJED-slAqUNOISTUREEDGROUNDWORX SIDEstlr soxx / coMP05I-.lug!la-5Qe(2:FLOWil'F,h'sp,l'+'l'tg,g',6, ^::,!',gfrirffl',ifffti'iFJ$-'.,:n'$g-AN ro rHE GRouND3, TO BE PLACED AT AN UPLAND I; siz[;i liinw ante enclosuRi io eE to''to' ADJUSTED--Io-lvAT-ER voLUMLi. iiiirn'olai siirriieeirs r',rnv a-r'usEo ro rrucneest RETENTToN & FILTERTNGNOTES:'i=-ift srrr soxx wlERt coNDlTrots D0 NoT allowSA^KFS TO BE DRI\€N,, i,i i'-si,xir'Li Jo ufEr rrrrnrxx sPEcrFlcAlloNsAND APPLICANON RLOUIREMENTS'. .i,'i Iirri iouFosT MATERTAT To Bt orsPERsFc)- oru srri. AS DETERMINED BY INGTNEERO iITTEN MEOiA/STRAW BALES ]O 8E INTRT AND TREI' riiiri rnvrstit wtEDs aND NoN-NATivt sPEclEss. ilai srexr BEHtNo SocK AT sLlGHl ANGLE'USTRAW BALE/SILT FENCEINGNSCALE:J2NK\ilililFILTER BAG
REVIS ONS
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
PERMITTING REVISED
PFRMlTTING REVISED
PERMITT]NG REVISLD
PERMITTING REV]SED
PERM]TTING REVISED
OATE
t4 /?9 /?t
15 /1? /21
11 /X/)?
NO
4
5
F'Frt! ca=\NH
BH
=u)
l'r
T
z
I
-
a
=
a
d
*o
h il fLE:SItE NAIE: Sdnfl tARIdnn
SITE NIITBEK TA-5'01
,DrnBSS: ,011 NXJ?E I
SOWN YANMNH, TA 0?561
APPL!CANT:
BWE SXT TOIEP.S III, UX
BLUE Sl(Y s52 PIRK SnREEI
TOWERS lll, LlGif#Ir'ff r,*, yA otusl
3lz
l3
l;
t;
o
m
2oz
o
oc
_!-ro
T]
d
-to'-t
-g)
rq
9>
>!;
l
9
oa
=I
Io
a
mI..1
IE
l:
l_=llt
(i =oE=IO1i1 m9in=t6\z-),/i:J!4 3.',.8.I6r6ozo€6oIo4I2Oo4oq!zzo o4F;+tl ToP (P)(HTcHEST CHURCH TOWER ROOFAPPURTENAN CE)F93t>1oFci>:Q2>tl itIr6oanooooOO!^>o10 0r0.013 62110-i330-14.210.111 711 412 8211.7
\) (!
OO
VIRTICAL
b
q
@moIoz
m
!
Fz
O
OO c)
(,
O
(o
O
N
N)
GLoloo+o+o+o+too !
O
!
O
o
o
o)
IT+l3
I
l
I+
3
r
iv
Co
o{
=o
m
m
{
6z
X!!
ZBrFzn
lonz
(!o
-l
.l
_l
-t +00
4
m:
alozt
O
N
N
O
+o
!
o+
I
+
o+
o+
+
+
o
15
OOO
-
4
6q
19,m-{o={=
Fil
EU
{6\z
oz
oI
=6
zo
oC2
0
>or.-2
nag
ar-
S-tz
TOP (P) CHURgH TOWER ROOF
(HI6HEST APPURTENANCE)
115
d',
+
ri
><q><--hr>
- o -ooolci -->: oiii
F5;5xJ--OJ
9q
9.7
1)?
14 0?
11
92
13 62
11.1----1229-
14.4
13.4
O O
@
O o
o
6
lc^P!-ll4.noltlGt\\* -/tffit<rrioutstlcGlLTOf,ER tux*n ITYIE@ wrnrrrnrrmrrrrr:ilrna @ rcwen@ rowrn @ ransurronrtnomrwn@ row:n @ rer'r'urronnxomwn@ -* @ r:r'rurrornmrol:n@ arrmureonmxoro:e @ rororourowm@ owrorowu @ eutolxowtrnrrrsrtmrOe:u-annnorarcrowrn @lerrnrmx'onoulo@ roxoror,rrowen @ wrrrnrrttx'rrrxortreO rsu.rurrornxorovren^ WATEN TAiI( - EI.EI'AIED FI.I'IEO(9 courlwmtrrrtlur^ warri rAta( - oi(,lrND WlfllQ) rrrrtrrurliirwffil\/l\SKYctdII lla*B'tatlEl 1III\/Itt\\o^t*{e ,/.\- tI/NoHKISTING CELL TOWEHSITESSCALE: l"=5,OOO' (11'17)n'AFroundhoullaOATT:ECEXISTINO CELL TOWER SITESSITE IIAME: SOUTH YAFMOUTHSITE NUMBERT MAdl0f1o4a ROUTE 28SOUTHItA O26elAPPI ICANT:BLUE sl(YTowERs lll' LLC352 PARK STREETSUITE 100NORtrH READINo' MA01664ProTerraDESIGN GROUP' LLC
7
6"rstemsC Sqr"rarecl S)'stems, LLC65 Dartrnouth Drivct\uburn, NI-l 03032Phone: (603) 6442800support@csqurrcds)'stems'comJuly 6, 2020RF RePortProposed Wireless FacilitYat&tMA1010rc44 Route 28South Yarmouth, MA 02664
TABLE OF CONTENTSl. Overview2. Introduction....3. AT&T Mobility Coverage and Capacity Objectives """"4. Pertinent Site Data5. Coverage Analysis and Propagation Plots................1....,'..........1.J3,J.66. Summary.......67. Statement of Certification ....."""""""8. Attachments '.LIST OF TABLESTablel:AT&TMobilitySitelnformationUsedinCoverageAnalysis..3ATTACHMENTSAttachment l: MA10l0 -Neighbor sites & Radial Distances..'.Attachment 2: MAlOlO - Area Tenain Map"""""" """"""""""'9Attachment 3: MAl010 - Existing 700 MHz LTE Coverage """""""' """""10Attachment 4: MA1010 -700MHzLTE Coverage with Proposed site """""" """"""""11Attachment5:MAl010-Existinglg00MHzLTECoverage...'.'.'.'.'....,.,....12Attachment6:MAl0l0_lg00MHzLTECoveragewithProposedSite..........,.1 3..........8C Squared Systems, LI-CJ;dy 6,2020
1. OverviewThis RF Report has been prepared on bchalf of AT&T for itself and on behalf of the First Responder NctworkAuthority (,FirstNet,') in support of its applicat-ion to the Town of South Yamouth for the insallation and operationof a wireless facility locate d at 1.044Route 28 in south Yamouth, MA' The proposed faclkq is needed to fill acoverage gap that currcntly exists in AT&T"s network, while providing prioritized, preemptive wireless servicesfor first responders.AT&T,s proposal consists of ground-based equipment cabinets and antennas mounted on top of a proposed towerat a height of 100 feet. The proposerl facil-ity has been selected by FirstNet as stritable for impiementation of theNationai Public safery Broadbancl Network ('NPSBN'), while also addressing a substantial gap in 4G LTR covefagcfor AT&T's network.This report concludes that the proposecl site will provide coverage improvement to areas of South Yarmouth in orderto impr<rve cleficient service areas along Forest Road, state Flighway 2S,LongPond Road and the surroundingroacls and neighborhoods in the proximity of the proposed site'Included in this repon is: a brief summafy of the site's obiectives, maps showing AT&T's neighboring sites' andpredicted Radio Frequency coverage maps of the sublect site ancl the surrounding sites in AT&T's netrvork'2. IntroductionAT&T is licensed by the FCC to provide wireless communications services throughout the Northeast Regioninclucring the Town of South yamourh, MA. AT&T provides digital voice and data services using 3rd Generation(3G) LIMTS technology in the 800 MHz and 1900 MHz frequency bancls' ancl is deploying advanced 4th Generation(4G) voice and dataservices over LTE technology in the 700 MHz, 850 MHz (Cellular), 1 900 MHz (PCS)' 2100 MHz(A\ilS), and,Z311MHz IXICS) bands, "s a]lo.^J by the FCC. The 4G LTE netrwork builds on the existing 3G dataservices that utiiize UMTS technologl. These data networks are used by mobile devices for fastweb browsing' mechastreaming and other applications that require broaclband connections. As part of AT&T's net\ilofk expansion andenhancement in Massachusetts and elsewhere in the United States, AT&T is filling in existing coverage gaps andaddressing capacity,interference, ancl high-speecl broadband issues' The mobile devices that benefit from theseadvanced data networks are not [mited to basic hanclheld phones, but also include devices such as smartPhones'pDA's, tablets, and laptop air-cards. with the evolving rollout of 4G LTE, services and devices' AT&T customerswill have even faster connections to peoirle, information, and entcrrainment.FirstNet is a fecleral agency with a mandateto create a nationwide, interoperable public safety broadband network for{irst responders. First responders across the counffy currently rely on more than 10,000 sepafate radio networkswhich oftentimes do not inte{oPerate with one another. By deploying a nationwide broadband purblic safety networkbuilt specifically to rneet the communications needs of first responclers, the FirstNet network will provide a solutionto the decades-long interoperability and communications challenges frst respondefs have experienced' and whichwas highlighted by the 9/tl Comnission's 2004 Final Report'F-irstNet selected AT&T to builcl, manage and operate the National Public Safety Broadband Network ('NPSBN')usingFirstNet's Band 14 spectrum (ca[ sigrr $QQE234, Z}M*zof the 700 MHz sPectrum)' togetherwith AT&T',sown witeless network. Using a combination of new and existing wireless facilities, AT&T provides prioritized,preemptive wireless services for first respondefs acfoss Massachusetts, New England and nationwide' while alsoC Squarecl Systems, LLC 1 Jt:ly 6'2020
improving 4G LTE coverage for AT&T customers, AT&T works closely with local, state, and federal first respondersin Jesigning the FirstNet network and selecting each new site'AT&T,s network requires the strategic deployment of antenna strucrures throughout rhe area to be covered' rvhichare connected to rcceivcrs and transmitters that operate in a limited geographic area known as a "cell"' Mobilesubscriber handsets and wireless devices opefate by transmitting and receiving low power radio frequency signals toand from these cell sites. The signals ale transferrecl through gfound telephone lines (or other means of backhaulffanspoft) and routed to their destinations by sophisticated electronic equipment' The size of the area served by eachcell site is dependent on several factors inclucling the number of antennas used, the height at which the antennas aredeployed, the topography of the su(rounding land, vegetative covef' and natural or man-made obstructions in thearea. As customers move throughout the service area, the transmission from the portable device is automaticallytransferred to the AT&T faciliry with the besr receprion, without interruption in service, provided that there isovedapping coverage between the cells'InorderforAT&T"snetr,vorktofunctioneffectively,theremustbeadequateoverlappingcovefagebetweenthe,,serving cell" and "adioining cells". This not only allows access to the network, but once connected allows for theffansfer or ,,hand-offl, of calls from one cell to another and prevents invoiuntary disconnections or "dropped calls'"AT&T,s antennas also must be located high enough above ground level to allow transmission (a'k'a' propagation) ofthe radio frequency signals above trees, buildings and other natural or man-made strucffies that may obstruct ordiminish the signals. Areas vrithout ad"qoot" ,^diu frequenry coverage have substandatd service characterized by poorvoice quality, clropped and blocked calls, slow data connecrions and transmissions' or no wireless service at all' Theseareas afecommonly referred ftl as "coverage gaps'"\We have concluded that by installing the proposed wireless communication facility on the proposed towet at 1044Route 2g Lt an afltennacenteline height of 100.0' AGL (above ground leveD, AT&T will be able to provide additionalcapacityand coverage improvemcnt to residents, businesses, and ttafficcorridors within Yamouth that are currendylclcated within deficient service areas of AT&T's network'2C Squated Systerns, LI-,CJ'ny 6,2020
3. AT&T Mobility Coverage and Capacity ObjectivesIn order to expand and enhance their wireless sewices thtoughout New England, AT&T must fill in exisdng covcragcgaps ancl acldress capacity, interference, and high-speed broadbancl issues' As part of this effort' AT&T hasdetermined that significant gaps in service exist in and around secdons of the town of Yamouth, MA, as describedfurther below.AT&T currently operates wireless faciliucs simrlar to the proPosed facility within Yamouth and thc surroundingcities/towns. Due in large part to the distances berween the cxisting sites, the intervening topography, and volumeof user aaffic in the arez,these existing facilities c{o not provrde sufficient coverage to portions of South Yamouth'Specifically, AT&T determined that much of areaknown as South Yamouth is without reliablc service in the followingareas and town roads, including but not limited to:r Forest Road;r State Highway 28;. LonBPondRoad;o The surrounding roads, neighborhoods and businesses in the proxirnity of the propclsed site and theabctve-mentioned road.4. Pertinent Site DataTable 1 bclow cletails the site-specific information for the on-air AT&T macro-sites used to perform thecoveraile anall'Si5 and generate the covcrag;e plots provided herein'TabletAT&TMobilitySitelnformationUsedinCoverageAnalysist5. Coverage Analysis and Propagation PlotsThe radio frequency covefage plots provided in this fepoft wefe proclurcecl using deciBel PlannerrM, a windows-based RF propagation computer modeling pfogram ancl nefwork planning tool' The software takes intoaccount the geographical features of afl area,lanci cover, antenna models, antenna heights' RF transmittingpowef ancl receiver thresholds to predict covefage ancl other relatecl RF paramcters used in site design andwireless network exPansion.I Some sites listed in this table are olltside the plot vicv, but are included ftrt courpleteness of infoflnation'C Squared Systems, LLC 3SiteNameAddressCity/StateI-ocationAntennaHeight(ft AGL)StructureTyp.StatusLatitudeLongitudeMAl0101044 Route 28South Yarmouth, MA41.6589-70.2042100TowerProposed SiteMAl119327 \J7hites PathSotrth Yarmouth' MA41.690570.1 886287Self-SuppottOn-AirMl\114549 C)cean StreetBarnstab.le, MA41.651770.282180/66l8oSelf-SupportOn-AirM41290Dunn RoadBarnstable, MA4"t.6883-70.281198Water Tank()n-AirM.l'1293blSmithRoadSouth Dennis, iVlA41.6918-70.t466147Sclf-SupportOn-AirMA^1.296480 Buck Island Road!flest Yarmouth, MA41.6626-70.2477126Water TankOn-AirMA13(r0875 lvlain Street Route 28Dennis, lfu\41.6669-70.1 50s150Water TankOn-AirMA136782 Shakcr House RoadYarmouth Port, Mr\41.7003-10.2279105PowerStanchionOn-Airldy 6,202()
srhile AT&T holds Iicenses in the 700 Mllz, g50 MFIz (Cellular), 1900 MHz GCS), 2100 M:Hz (A\fS), and2300 MHz(wcs) bands, this report fr>cuses on the 700 MFIz and 1900 MHz layers, which are representaliveof the 4G LTfi service most readily available to AT&T subscribers in South Yamouth, and ^re the spectrumlayers that are essential to AT&T's abiliry to address the coverage needs for their 4G LTE service offcrings'The followin g patagraphs discuss each of the AT&T maps attached hereto'Attachment 1 inled ,,MAI0l0 - Neighbor .fins dv lladial Distances" provides a view of the subject area showingthe locations .f AT&T,s existing sites within South Yamouth relative to the proPosed faciliry that may becontributing to the aggregate coverage in South Yamouth'Attachment 2 riied ,,MAl\lT - Afta Terrain Mqp" details the topogtaphical features around the proposed,,MA1010,, site. These terrain features play a key iole in dictating both the unique coverage arcas served froma given location, and the coverage gaps within the network' This map is included to provide a visualrepresentation of the te*ainvariati<-rns that musr be considered when determining the appropriate location anddesign of a proposed wireless facllity. The blue, green and yeilow shades correspond to lower elevations'whereas the orange, red, grel' and white shades indicate higher elevations'Attachment 3 titled"MAl\lT -Exittin|70A MH|LTE Coaerage"shows the coverage provided to ateas afSouth yamouth from the .,C)n-Air" sites listed in Table 1 and demonstrates that there are currendy gaps in 700MHz LTE coverage effecting service aklng key toadways, the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses inSouth yamouth, The.orr"rrg" shown is where the signal strengths ate: > -83 dBm (minimum required forreliable, high quatity service and perform ance at700 MHz) and, ) -93 dBm (minimum required for adequatelcvel of seryice ^t 700 MHz). In an effort to provicle the required levels of covefage to these areas' AT&T isproposing to install a rruireless factJ:ty on the proposed tower locate d at 10M Route 2tJ in South Yamouth at anantenna centedi.ne height of 100' (AGL)'Attachment 4 irled "MAl 01 0 - 700 MH4LL'E Co ' shows how this prop.sed site wouldfill in the existing covefage gaps and improve AT&T's 700 MHz LTE nerwork within the targeted areas' Asshown by the additionai areas of coverage in comparison with the Attachment 3, the proposecl facility willprovide covefage to:o - 1,4 mi along Forest Road;o - 1.2 mi along State Highway 28/ I'c>ngPond Road;o - 0.9 mi along Winslow GraY Road;o - 3,(-fl}adclitional residents2 within the surroundingarea at the 700 MI{z frequency;o - 700 aclditional employees3 within the proximity of the proposed facility;- 3,500 structures;The surrounc{ing roads, neighborhoods, and business areas within the proximity of the proposed site;oAttachment 5 tiied"'MA1010 -Existing190 " shows the coverage provided to areas ofSouth yamouth from the ,,On-Air" sites listed in Table 1 ancl similar to Exhibit 3, demonstrates that there arecurfently gaps in 1900 MHz LTE coverage in South Yamouth, only to ^ gte tef extent than at 700 MI{z' The2 population counts are based upon 2010 U.S. Census tesidential data. Pleasc notc that this does notinclude any visitor or vehiclecounts in the atea.3llmpioyee popularion colrnts are based upon the 2015 U,S, Ccnsus Bureau LEIID databaseC Squared Systems, LLC 4J'ny 6,2020
covefage shown is where the signal stfengths arc > -86 clBm (minimum level required for reliable high-qualitysefvice and performance at 1900 MHz) and> -96dBm (the minimum required for adequate level of service at1900 MHz),Attachmeng6improve AT&T,s 1900 MFIz LTE network within the targeted areas, As evident when compared against Exhibit5, ih" propused facility provides coverage improvement in South Yamcluth to the following:o - 1.5 mi along Long Pond Road;o - 1.2 mi along State HighvnY 28;o - 0.9 mi along Forest Road;o - z,z81additional residents within the surroundin1areaat the 1900 MHz frequency;o - 800 additional employees within the pr<lximity of the proposed facility;o - 2,180 structures;o The surrounding roads, neighborhoods, and business areas within the proximiry of the proposed site;5C Scluared Systems, LLCJdy 6,2020
6. SummarYIn undertaking its build-out of 4G LTE serwice in Barnstable county, AT&T has determined that an additional facilityis needed to provide reliable service ancl addition d. capacity throughout areas of south Yamoudr' MA' AT&Tdetermined that installing the proposed wireless communications facility at 7044 Route 28 in South Yamouth at anantenna centefline height of 100.0 feet (AGL) will provide addiuonal capacity and coverage needed in the targetedcovefage areas including key roadways such as Long Pond Road, State Highway 28' Forest Road and the surroundingroads, neighborhoods and bursinesses in the pro*iriity of the proposed site' In addition to providing service to therargeted areas of south Yamouth, AT&T is providing enhanced services for first responders through theimplementarion of F'irstNer',s National Pubfic safety Broadband Network ("NPSBN")' \without the insmllation<rf the proposed site, AT&T will be unable to improve and expand their existing 4G LTE wireless communicationseryices in this arca of south Yamouth; th"r"f,rr., ATaT respectfirlly requests that the Town of South Yamouth actfavorably upon the proposed faciliry'7. Statement of CertificationI certify ro the best of my knowledge that the statements in this rePort are tfue and accurate'U,,tt n^tSohail UsmaniC Squared Systems, LLCf.v.rws,zwDate6C Squared Systems, LI-CJdy 6,2020
8. Attachments7C Squated Systems, LLCJdy 6,202{)
MA1010 - Neighbor Sites & Radial Distances\Slte DataSit€: MAl0l0Lar: 4l-39-32.06 NLon:70-12-15.18 WCL: 100 ftSvmbol Kev* Exislingsitef Propmed SiteTerrsin Kev- Radiat Distance&atarvrr,;',.-:t';',i.!:
MA1010 - Area Terrain MaPSite DataSite: MAt0l0Lat:41-39-32.06 NLon: 70-12-15.18 wCL: 100 flSvmbol Kevf, ExistingSitef PrcposedSiteTerrain KevIoo tr*oI ron I son! zor EI *ofl rot I zotI atatvt 't..,I!l.t r't"s;t:+*J+tI$..=t'dJfunn&t@*.+..*$.$r _d-{",ag' sritkn 'l!'..t':-,rlf t))-.. ).j. ,,: ..lrtifuirlu, it..-, :!)1_--t)l J:i'"t: ' ' dffi'dlagdntJA{ffii*#td.9..9.4))!ryt.. a-:-3t: 22-r---:-^^i- .-'\*,
MAf010 - Existing 700 MHz LTE CoverageSlte DataSite: MAl010Lar: 4l-39-32.06 NLon:7&12-15.18 WCL: I00 ftPlot Information700 MHz LTE RSRPSvmbol Kevf exlsting Sitelk PropeedSiteCoveraqe KevI ---ero"*l.-gr--qroe.fl BebwTlr*holdpxat\,l",t,t:':4!iirtfi.1tl.O9,''$.rsi'-'a,1Il{t,tf{'1'r''tr;i. :i,IaI'{-,1@ltJ,r..!.::].iaar'rIfirtrt,tr:..:':j'l1,d;b,,a- \t,f,i;.\it+Ii.{f,:[Lks+l:r,i4;Iirldr6l:, :r.rl|.ttDiLttji{7)'.\a:;bri11J
MA1010 - 700 MHz LTE Coverage with Proposed SiteSite DataSite: MAl0l0Lar:41-39-32.06 NLon: 70-12-15,1 8 WCL: 100 ftPlot Information700 MHz LTE RSRPSvmbol Kevf Existing Sitef Proposed SiteCoverase Kev| "= -sr ar.!.-g3t=-9369.f] Bebw thrmholdgatatv
MA1010- Existing 1900 MHz LTE CoverageSite DataSite: MAl0l0Lar;41-39-32.06 NLon:70-12-15.18 WCL: 100 ftPlot lnformetion1900 MHz LTE RSRPSvmbol Kevf existing Site* Proposed SiteCoverage Kev! >-86dBml'-so-'xdBtl-l Bebw ThssholdQatat
MAl010 - 1900 MHz LTE Coverage with Proposed SiteSite DataSite: MAl0l0Lat: 4l-39-32.06 NLon:70-12-15.18 WCL: 100 ftPlot Information1900 MHz LTE RSRPSvmbol KevI nxisting sitef, Proposed SiteCoverage KevI >-B6dBm!.-eot--eodn-fl BelowThresbold9atatv,','J1'l rt';l *,1lih;4tJJt4;S:i'i: t;4rt;HlI!,1;'.:'{J\ !.!)a_Irll'-:i1:tit;-l1i:J.) ;a!.:i:::!ii{i:i.llttilL!IrigQT
6trstemsC Scluarccl SYsterls, LLC)65 Dattmotrdr DtivcAuburn, Nl l 03032Phone: (603) 644 280tlsu ppcrrt((9csqtr rrrccl systems'con tJuly 6,2021Tclwn of Scluth Yarmouth, MACapc Cod Commission DRI Subcommittee3225Main Street,P.O.Box226Barnstablc, Massachusetts 02630Sun;rcr: 1044Roure28TBr-BcotvtMUNICATIoNSToSYERMcmbers of thc Subcommiftcc:Regarcling some of thc technical RF (raclio frequency) characteristics of the proposed tower at 1044 Route 28in South yarmouth, AT&T is submitting this srrppl"#ental lettet ancl RF .,,""tug" maps to support its positionon that location,s potential abiliry to satisfy the network necds in the atea.Thc proposed facility MA1010 provicles better coverage in South Yarm<l-uth than the alternates presented by lsotroPe'It fills coverage gaps on maior roads, such as State lfrghway 28 Forest Road and long Pond Road' At 100 feet' theheight allows-hri *or. covefage than the other alternatc sites.Below table shows the loss in pops/ areaf roadcoverage stats at 90fg 80ft & 70ft compared t() the proposed 100ft'Incfemental Covcrage700 MHz LTECoverageat 100ftCoveraSeat 90ftCoverageat 8llftCoverageat 70ftLoss in Coverage{100ft-90ft1Loss in Coverage{xooft-8oft}Loss h Covente(100ft-70ft1Population Coverage: -e -93 dBnt36696q8ll?765i2575t9t61094{29,8%)L753(47896le6(13,8%lArea Covered (*it)i-() -93 dBn))18?))\-1?1.761.25o.471t7.4%lo.94(34.8%)1.45(53.7%)Stfuctufes Count() -93 dBrn)-1558Slll2467 17524471r2.6%lL09Lf,0.7%l1806(50.8%)Table 1: Coverage Comparison of Proposed Site at 100ftThe aiternate site at 1045 Rt 28 is an existing 70'flagpole with two LlpPef siots taken by the caffier' The next avatlable;;iil;;;;rh. Tl', .uri.ris at 45' and 3i'which is ,,!ry nrv and will i"^u* .ou"t"g" gaps in areas whete the proposedsite will provide reliable coverage along Rourte 28 and the surounding areas' In particular, to the southrvest alongroacls & neighborhood betweei Seavilrv Avenue and Run Poncl Road. Also, to the north"vest, it provides morccoverage ,,, lh. ,.ro,rl.rncling roads & neighborhood north of \Winslow Gray R<rad'if AT&T was to go within a 90'pole, anc{ assuming T-Mobile-wouicl.be the top carrier'.th:I T3y require ryt RtDcenters down below. T-Mobile would be at g5' and"75'which leaves AT*T rviih 65'and 55'. 55' is barely above theffee line. Furthermore, fiagpoles aren't "equipment" friendly' The way sites are designed now, RRFI's are installednear the antennas which allows the carriers to use a fiber and a short coax design for fiber' Flagpoles aren't conduciveto rad.ios because there is no roo11-l for them to be installed near the antennas. 'I'herefore, the carfiers need to fevertback to the old school coax design which means AT&T would Likely need (30) 7 /8" coaialcables to be run insidethe pole. In adclirion, T-Mobile -oota dro neeci a lot of coaxial cables running to rhe top of antcnnas inside the polervhich means the flagpole would likely need to be gteater than-48" in diamcter, Anothet lifriting factof is the antennasize; it is impossibleil fit 3 sector or,r...o, tt ot ,.t*t uses for desigr in a standard diametet flagpole '
6"rstemsC Scluarecl SYstcms, LLC65 L)altnrouth DtiveAubttrn, NH 03032Phone: (603) 644 2800support(t)cscluarcclslgtenr s.con.tThe Church alternate is another suggested site ancl is not a viable option at 40'5'compared to the proposed MA1010site. It provides linle benefit tu tne rriiat covcrage gaps alon_g Ro.ute )g undOld Main Street and the surrounding roads'It provicles very little .,;"rug" to the roads ntia i"ighboti'oods north ancl northwest of the proposed MA1010 sitc'Church sites also provide iess flexibility than tooreisites or r'oftops whcn it comes to changing azimuths becauseantennas cannot be pointed at the desired angle due to fixe.i corners of the church steeple leading t" pt::iPl:interference issues. Also, issues with space and ridio overheating are evident, which necessitates the usage of HVACunits to cool the steeple. On top of this, these I{VAC uniti and antennas add more issues with state historicpreservation offices (SHPOs), strucntral integrity, ancl cost. Due to this, steeples are used as a last resort by AT&T'The alternate at \lrxTK Tower cloes not provide any benefit to the vital covefage gaps along Route 28 and{)ldMain street and the surrounding roads, o, well as th" ,oo.l, and neighborhoods north and northwest of theproposed MA1010 site. This ^lt"inat" site mainly benefits the cape to the southwest of the M41010 proposedslte.Below is a comparison table of the proposed site at i00ft with the Church and 1045- Rt28 polc'Incremental Covetage700 MHz LTEProposedTower at100ft1045 Rt28at 70ftChurch atALltLoss ln Coverage(Proposed'1045RfiZ8lLoss ln Coverage(Proposed -Church!Population Covetage:-933669I &i8426L83L(49.9%l3243188.4%lBusiness PoP Covetage:(2 -93 dBm)698577316t2l(t7 '3Yol382(s4.7%lArea Covered(- -93 dBm)J'71.290.29t.4r152.2%l2.41(8e.3%l(2 -93 dBm)12.8722.455.7520.82(48.6%l37.L2(85.6%lStructutes CountE -93 dBm)355817104591848(s1.9%)3099(87.1%)network.Sincerely,SohailUsmaniRF Engineer (Contractor to AT&T)Table2:CovetageComparisonofProposedSitewithAltemateswe have concluded that by utilizing the prop<;secl towef at 1044 Route 28 at an antenna centedinc height of100,AGL, AT&T will be nbl" ,o prirlrUe sig"ificant coverage improvement to the residents, communiry areas'and traffic corriclors within South Yarm<>uth that u." .,rrr"tily loiated r,vithin deficient service areas of AT&T's
6"rstemsC Squared SYstetls' LLC65 Darmrouth DrivcAuburn, NH 03032Phone: (603) 6442800supportffi)c squ arcd sys tetn s. c o rnSeptember 28,2021Cape Cod Commission DRI Subcommittee3225 Main StreetP.O.Box226Barnstablc, Massachuset ts 02630Sunyecrr 10zM Rourg 28 TrI-ncoNIMLTNICATIoNS TowsnMembers of the Subcommittce:This letter is in response t1; the comments madc by Mr. Davicl Maxson of Isotrope in the Review of Applicant'sSupplemental Statement in Support of Application for Development of Regional Impact dated August3'2A21related to AT&T's propor"a inst^ilotion fn tn" tower at 1044 Route 28 in South Yarmouth'Isotrope comment: lwe also find that combining AT&T's_coverage by adding the wXTI( tower (at only 90feet) and from the profor".{ site using oniy 80 fee-t height, the Route 28 corridor is satisfied'Response: W-XTI( Tow er is 2.27 miles South \7est of the proposed site and doe s not rneet the design obie ctiveof the proposed site ^t 1044 Route 28 in South Yn.mooih (Site Name: MA1010)' The coverage to AT&T'snetwork that would be added to the area by WXTI( tower site woulcl not sefve the current AT&T networkobjectives to address coverage gaps on State Highw ay 28,.Forest ,Road and Long Peind Road' AT&T hasdetermined thar this area ofsouth yarmouth witi'rout'reliable service is a prioriry and the installation at 1044Route 28 at the specifiecl antenna centerline height of 95-feet.will.improve its.overall network performance' Aninstallation on the proposed telecomrnunicati<ins tower at 1044 Route 28 is also essential for satisf ing themandate of FirstNet to creare a nationwide, interoperable public safety broadband nerwork fot first responders'Through its deployme nt at 7044Route 28, AT&T will conunue its efforts to provide prioritized, preemptivewireles.s services for first responders in Massachusetts'Isotrope comment: AT&T',s consultant, c-squared systems, has not indicated why the selected 90-foot heighton the nfXTK tower is so low.Response: \grxTK tower site was used to clemonstrate the covera ge at 725' and 150' in the attached coverageplots. The increase in if," h"igrrt does not $ange the fundame n u{Fu.t that the !fXTK tower is not a feasiblealternative to the installation of the AT&T "qiip*"n, ofl the proposecl telecommunications tower at 1044Route 28. The installation at either the 125' *'tdo'height on th; wxTK tovrer does not provide any.benefitto the targeted coverage gaps along State Highway 28, Flrest Roacl, Long Pond Road and the surrounding areanorth and northwest "f tft" ptop"ied installati on at 1'044 Route 28'Isorrope commenr: AT&T only shows the rwo highest signal level thresholds indicating the highest qualityof servic., typically to penetrate local buildings'Response: The coverage shown is where the signal strength^s afe: > -83 c{Bm (minimum required fot reliable'high quality service ancl perform ance ^IZOO Mftzl ^nd,; -g3.dBm (minimum required for adequate level ofservice at700MHz). aT.af. uses these metrics to deterrnine levels for reliable service on its nelwork and toiclentify areas with deficient coverage ancl capaciry. At these two.thresholds of reliable covefage' AT&T is ableto pr<lvicle customefs with wireless service that fulfills its network obiectives'Isotfope comment: This informadon suggests that cAMs (or non-cAMs) at the Bo-foot height could bevaluable contributors to the coverage in thii densely developed area along Rt 28' It is not necessary to assume
6"rstemsAT&T ancl T-Mobiic must occupy the same BO-foot srfucturc, especially if the lower positions on the pole areobstructecl by vegetation of afe io., clrrse to neailry building heights' The composite map above demonstratesrhat at most, an B0-foot stftlctufe is needed to fili in th" gap oiung tht Rt 28 corridor' provided the WXTI(rower is also usecl. This confirms that Verizon's approach is sound for AT&T and T-Mobile'Response: Because of equipment and operational requirements,-CAMS are not feasible options for addressingAT&T,s network ,"q.rir"*"rrts. AT&T' not only uses rnultiple frequencies but also various techntlkrgies thatare incompatible with the cgnstraints inherent to the installotio.t of ut t"nnas and equipment inside of a CAMtorver. This is only exacerbatecl by the complex wireless usage that increasingly consists.of dat'atather than voiceservice. The demand for clata has grown exponentially .rrrJ, the ysrl15 ancl ls constantly growing' Below graphanci excerpt from the rvhite paper further demonstrate the claim;C Scluared Svstems, I-LC65 Dartmouth l)riveAubutn, NI{ 03032Phonc: (603) 6442800support(Dcsquarccls)'stems.conr450O4,OOO3,50O3,(XlO2r5m4{no1,50O1,odt500oproiected/Measured N. American Mobile Data Traffic 201G19rgo=ogaiJ?Iaa,gi sezrq2mtz Atlt 2014 20t5 2016 lm? 20n8IGfe.ololJ hU.. Odltrrllk 'fsl|tfmrfr-fd.rror t'b,t l lilo!& lrllt rrfic ' Lortll Anrrlo-'Dl..fim b.d on Foc 6to$|| ntE-lri.j.mufn D.t Trdf,cc.er,$to l0f'.tttt(tu3Edq'drJ35{lllr lgl2010 20112019.,The u.S. commercial wireless inciustry cannot m€et this explosive growth simply through improvedengineering,"white-paper-new.PdfFew other feasofrs why cAMS afc not an option can be further explained bclow;Muitiple antenna center lines ncedecl by each carner'Need to run bulkv co-axial cables from insicle the pole. Each a-nten:a has an average of t2 ports' Carriers m-a1'neecl ro install 12 runs of coaxial cable for "ach ant"nna. Multiply that by the total n"T-".lo: inside the pole foreach carrier. with AT&T'S 6 anrennas installecl at two diffeient heights inside the cAM they may need tninstali a total of 72 runs of coaxial cables'Antenna size is much larger than it rvas a clecacle ago. carriers are now installing antennas that are about B feetlong ancl 2 feet wicle. The antennas afe now .*polil. of supporting more hardware and handling more traffic'CAM diameter wor-rlcl have to be wicle enough i, o..,rrntoodate the anteflnas and the cable runs'
C Squared SYstems, LLC65 Dartmouth DriveAubutn, Nl-I 03032Phone: (603) 6442800suppof tCDcsquaf eclsystems'comIf active components are installecl in the cAM then a cooling mechanism would have to be put in place toprevent over heating of the equipment.Further expansion or modification becomes impractical due to tight space to allow for additional hard'ware'!7e have concludcd that by utilizing the proposed tower at 1044 Route 28 atthe specified centedine height of95-feet as reflected in the attacheJradio frequency coverage plots for both 700 MHz and 1900 MHz LTEsefvice, AT&T' will be able to provide significant'cu',r"rug-" imptovement to south Yarmouth' while alsoaddressing a substanrial gap in 4G LTE covefag€ rol att]'3 network, the proposed location has also beenselected by FirstNet o, ,,iirulrl" for implementati-on of the National Public Safety Broadband Netrvork'Sincerely6*rstemsfd".!tl^ffi.,*Sohail UsmaniRF Engineer (Contractor to AT&T)
MAl010 - 700 MHz LTE Coverage with Proposed Site'rn-\Site DataSite: MAl0l0Lat: 4l-39-32.06 NLon: 70-12-15.18 WCL: 100 ftPlot lnformatioB700 MHz LTE RSRPSvmbol Kev.'k Existing Sitef Propo*d SiteCoverase Kev| >-83dBml.-al--llds.f Below Threshold&atatv.^(I,1l5itt:Itli,A'111' jr:)l.@f,19{,t,Ih.$1ItF,({&-'7Nl4r'-lt,t. iIt1:)Irlii:{J@t,. -;Lf,r,.4d'lrfr,F{ti. '. it.\r'2f,it",i'*''r^\(-4':,'.4/'li'tFN ^. _'ir,i;r;rilir i:'Itr,'"s\tl*Id.{#[Lu#hJtifi;i;"!!!:,ta: Iii: Ij.\;ilr-Ori;!., :lirr&,! -":t)l-t'7 ,,,tl.',.'i:riIi*t.1igr4:!Jt
MA1010 - 700 MHz LTE Coverage with Alt 1047 Rt 28Site DataSite: MAloloLat 4t-39-32.06 NLon:70-12-15.18 WCL; 100 ftPlot lnform&tion700 MHz LTE RSRPSvmbol Kevf ExistingSitef Proposed Sitc*. Altemate SiteCovenge Kev! > -83 dBm|.-Bl:- rdn.f] BelowThrcholdQatat,' . LrA''1t')'. (,]r,,r, rieli\,, [i;i.j p)>ii{,},,'",;,\d,i'a.aIrlit@3l?,t-t,lh's{rF{&'7ti't'lir ltT,I{lI,. ,"iavi.,ldt'-.1 r;1q,;;9,,@,, i4i2{It'i-(.28.H.4. ,'at5tr-\sn .,f|''liui:'flu,' -2^( [I,t,i(ci,.)Y'lr}), ii- {' !i.t{. .*r,..\f "-ru\.tIfi,l.tnr-')'tI''r;ldi#[ir$eh+.,ai!:it,,:;if)lrDlBi i?.t&li,iiil,K,filir?ra,,9J:.'-rrr-, : ) ::)j:)
MA1010 - 700 MHz LTE Coverage with Alt WXTK TowerSite DataSite: MAl0l0Lat:41-39-32.06 NLon:70-12-15.18 WCL: t00 ftPlot Information700 MHz LTE RSRPSvmbol KevI Existing sitef Proposed Site*' Altemate SiteCoveraqe Kev! t= -er On.| <-e:>=- lds.l-l Below Threshold&*t,1 'Te\Ttr*l'..( tr,tl:id.,\r.. it;.\ir1i19t'..t z1t1ti :.u 1y6r.l'a.ar,Ttr@{.t,Ihs1,I{t,{{t-'f| /t-'1,,+\'{It@llJ,i}\li{.1,'r.!-'' ir\cl,€, J,i;\ir!tr{,1,-l ,'.. 's 'at'1{ ;,1:L..t1,{f,iit .+,'illrlr\ j1,ti(i)t{J: rl1-4i,ii{itrrtlr*,iiiJq.lll,Ir'ir,',i;'.{.tt.ii illii llr;! liil'r'ix,s?':l!1.;.r.J',3r, >,.,:. 'f
Existing LTE (MidBand) Coverage - South Yarmouth, MA
-1m
-95
0
h-V€**le
l!8d(llgCm
:l:"\l,,lrlii'
txisting [-TE {LowBand} Ccverage * Scuth Yarrncuth, [VtA
!F . .lloltilt'
2
ft
-99
-94
0
O!td@r
h-V€hicie
h-Buiktn9
ffi!*ltg Cm
LTE (MidBand) Coverage with Propose Site 4HY0604H at 1l-5 Feet Rad Ctr-
South Yarmouth, MA
LTt (LowBani) Coverage wiih Pr"cpcse Site 4l-tY06il4i-l at 1l-5 Feet Rad Ctn
South Yarrnouth, l\lA
:F..\lobile'
LTE tn-Building (MidBand) Coverage for Propose Site 4HY0604H - South Yarmouth, MA
Coverage Ma[s Simulated on Different Heights 115 Feet, L00 Feet and 80 Feet
tJ
----1:t'='
! erbtingc-*"g.
Propced Cdsage at 115 f eet Rad Ctr.
.' Propo*dcdsageatl&Fmttladcb
I eropcedcrerage atgtFeet Radctr.
:l;"\lolrik"
5
LTE tn-Building (LowBand) Coverage for Propose Site 4HY0604H - South Yarmouth, MA
Coverage Maps Simulated on Different Heights Ll-5 Feet, 100 Feet and B0 Feet
l: ' '\1i,lrili
Edstil€Coretage
Propc€d cderageat 115 Feet Radctr.
ffi noPcedcoeragedl{xlF€€tRadctr
I er"e*"Oc-r.-g.atgtFetRadcb.
Existing LTE (Low-Band) Coverage - South Yarmouth, MA
Propose LTE (Low-Band) Coverage - 4HY0604H at 106 Feet
Existing LTE (Mid-Band) Coverage - South Yarmouth, MA
'.l:7 r t+
Propose LTE (Mid-Band) Coverage - 4HY0604H at 106 Feet
t'?
Existing LTE (MidBand) Coverage - South Yarmouth, MA
Propose LTE (MidBand) Coverage - 4HY0604H at 1L5 Feet
:i.: ' '\lr il,ili'
propose LTE (MidBand) Coverage - Verizon Location at 45 Feet
Propose 45 Feet arrailaile its coverage Com
-100
-95
0
h-Vsii.
h-aufthq
:l:"\!rlrilt'objective
Propose LTE (MidBand) Coverage - Bass River Alternative Location (932-940 Rt 28,
Ya rmo uth )
Cm
-100
.95
-106
00
Outdos
b-ve{tde
FBul6h9
:l: ' '\lolril'1
propose LTE (MidBand) Coverage -Town Parcel Alternative Location (290 W Yarmouth)
Proposa
:F ''\lrbilt'
Propose LTE (MidBand) Coverage * Town Parcel Alternative Location (99 Buck lsland)
C.n
Outd@.
li-V'ehiaie
h-tulrhq
-100
-95
0
:l: . .\lrbilt'.
9
Photo simulations to be generated by Applicant aftercrane test has been completed, which is to be scheduledwith the Town.
1
NOTAN3225 MAIN STRFET o trg. [Ql t26' tBARNSTAB LE, MASSACHOSETPS 92630Bk 3+9e7 Fg315 +93s5rr:r?*;I4-3{f 2:1 A 1x- E,+?f,rLNOTANOFFICIACOPY(508) 362-3s28 . Fax,:.?rf"?t ; TY"o*"0*t'"f'F"t'{, o "COMMISSIONNTNOCAPE CODTCOPYCOPYDEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAT IMPACT DECISIONDate:Project:ProJect Applicant:Property Owner:Properly/ Site:Title ReferencelJanuary 13,2022-Atue S[y Towers South Yarmouth Re-submission (File No. 21012)Blue Sky Towers lll, LLC d/b/a BSTMA lll, LLCc/o Ricardo Sousa, Esq., Prince LobelTye, LLPOne lnternational Place, Suite 3700, Boston, MA 02110Roman Certholic Bishop of Fall River1044 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MA 02664(Assessors MaP 50; Parcel 189.1)Book669, Page 144Blue sky Towers Re-submission, South Yarmouth, MA - commission File No. 21012Development of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2022-Page1SUMMARYThe cape cod cOmmission ("commission") hereby grants Developrnent of Regional lmpact ('DRl")approval, with conditions, for "Blue sky Towers souttr varmouth Re-submittal," to construct a 1 10-footwireless communications tower with associated improvements at 1A44 Route 28 in SOuth Yarmouth'pursuant to a vote of the commission at its meeting on January 13,2022.FINDINGSThe Cape Cod commission hereby finds and determines as follows:F1. The Applicant proposes development on a leased portion of a 4'4-acre +/- parcel, which Currentlycontains a chapel church building and parking area ("Property" or "site"), by constructing a 110-foot multi-c"rri"l" *onopole-style wireless communications tower with assoclated equipment(,,project,,). The Applicani h", legal standing to pursue the Project through a letter of authorizationfrornthe Property owner (Roman catholic Bishop of Fatl River).F2. The east side of the property abuts Route 28 and is occupied by other commercialproperties' Thewest side of the property is predominantly occupied by single famity residences. The Property is ina Freshwater Recharge Area (FWRA) but i; not mapped for other sensitive resources identified in
F3.F4.Bk 34927 P9316 #9989the Regional policy Plan ('Rpp") such as priority habitat, natural landscapes, or undeveloped areassubjecttoflooding, NOT NoTAN ANGiven the surro6n$in5 ,t.wry seyglopment rettFrrli arddhq typepf development beingproposed, the SYte'is U-ttFtit;nt"A Uy the'suburben@ryelgpment Area" Placetype' SuburbanDevelopment Areas ui" iftJraii'erized by^moderately dense resldential neiShborhoods as well asautomobile-orientedcgJngelcialdevelopment. N O tThe Applicant proposes b etvelop and operate^on-tng&j$t$ite ap approximately 11q-foot-tallwiretess comr,.ftiFut'SnItdnel r,ftttlottrer sunSrfih{a8 ill{,dfo hhprovements, including:COPYo clearing l/+-dct} +/- of wooded area;. constructing a 55'x65'stone compound surrounded by a 6'-tall stockade fencing;. installing the monopOle tower, carrier antennas, concrete equipment pads, and allassociated ground equipment (including equipment cabinets, propane generators,propane tanks, ice nriOge protection, and high sound mitigation shields) within the fencedarea;r installing an approximately 12'x35' gravel driveway connecting the fenced area to theexisting parking lot;. installing vegetated stormwater management swales along the perimeter of the fencedarea;. loaming and seeding the disturbed areas outside of the fenced area; and. plantings to visually buffer the proposed compound and assoclated ground'mountedequipment,Suburban Development Area strategies include improving the design and function of comrnercialareas through landscaplng and stormwater treatment; and encouraging redevelopment ofexisting commercial subuiban development with denser ilusters of buildings surrounded by lessdeveloled areas. The Applicant proposes to develop a currently undeveloped portion of theProperty and to provide landscaping and stormwater management'Ongoing operations and activity at the Property would be minimal. Due to the minimal ongoingoperations, the Project does not involve regionally iignificant or sustained effects on thetransportation network.F6.1 The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 at 47 USC 5332(cX7XB)(i) provides that anyregulation of the placement, construction, and modification of personal wlreless servicefacilities by any State or local government or instrumentality thereof shall not prohibit orhave the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services.t6.Z The Federat Telecommunications Act of 1996 at 47 USC 5 332(c) (TXBXiii) provides that anydecision by a State or local government or instrumentality thereof to deny a request toplace, construct or modify personal wlreless service facilities shall be in writing andsupported by substantial evidence contained in a written record.Blue SkyTowers Re-submission, South Yarmouth, MA- Commlsslon File No' 21012Development of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2A22 - Page2F5F6.
Bk 34927 P9317 #9989BACKGROUNDt7. The project was previol!{91#ui"*"0 as a Develop-.",\tfig'onal lmpact (ERl) as File No' 21005,which was with$rayvp1f,n$ of Ol.Ut prior to $egto5e 1f $eprf tigfrearing process' This re-submittal is a continqEtign pf $at review process' C O P YF8. The Applicant made thfrfslqf,ing modifications to its p(PryTl from DRI File No' 21005 in theapplication reviewed her6: ,O A No the tow@ hEigfit ba(bderPreduced by 1@fl5rE12D'6 T1q Lo the breadth ofihg.Eui$ment frames fras neerf,r&,fi"Jrto* 12'to 6' on each of the threefaces of the frames;. spacingbetweentheAntenna RADCenters hasbeen reduced by4-5' from 15'to 10'-11';r the equipment pad area has been reduced from 70' x75' (5,250 sf) to 55'x 60'(3.300 sOi. tree clearing haS been reduced from 1 1,390 sf to 9,960 sfir utility lines have been moved from overhead to underground;r fencing has been changed from chain-link to stockade; and. landscaping has been increased.Fg. The commission retained, at the Applicanfs expense, a consultant with expertise reviewingtechnical aspects of the proposal. The consultant, David Maxson of lsotrope Wireless, LLC(,lsotrope,,), provided an initial report on the origlnalapplication for File No.21005, followed bysupplemental comments on that filing. lsotrope submitted additional comments for this filing,which were reviewed as part of the proceedings'PROCEDURAL HISTORYF1 0. The project requires mandatory DRI review pursuant to Section 3 of the Commission's Chopter A:Enabling Regulotions 7overning Review of Developments of Regionol lmpsct ('Enobling Regulations')(revised May 2020) as the "lclonstruction of any wlreless communication Tower exceeding 35 feetin overall height...".Fl 1 . The Commission received a mandatory DRI referral for the Project from the Town of Yarmouth('Town") on 8/1212O21.F12. The hearing period was opened procedurally on 10/1 512021F13, The Applicant submitted a DRI application for the Project to the Commission on 1A/25/2021'F14. The first substantive hearing was held by a DRI Subcommittee ("Subcommittee") on the Project on12114/2AU. The hearing was continu ed to 1t312022, where the subcommittee reviewed a draftwritten DRI decision prJpareU by staff at the Subcommittee's direction' At this hearing session, theSubcornmittee voted 4 in favor, 1 opposed to recommend to the full Commission that it grant DRIapproval for the project, with conditions, as set out in the draft written DRI decision reviewed bythe Subcommittee,F15. The full Cape Cod Commission held a hearlng on the Proiect at its meetin g on 1/13/2022' ltconsidered the recommendation of the Subcommittee, including the draft written DRI decision' AtBlue Sky Towers Re-submission, South Yarmouth. MA - Commission File No' 21012Development of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2Q22 - Page3
Bk 34927 Pq318 #9989the hearing on 1/13/2AZZ, the Commission voted to adopt the draft written DRI decision, andapprove the ProJect, w[h ordlconditions set out in saidtieos& decision'DRIREVIEWSTANDAF^' AN ANS"utrcrAL oFFtcrALF16. Section O(cxviii)if ih g,VnWm;grtotions contains thg S1pafds to be met for DRI approval' .which includu, u, "ppfi.ubte, consistency with the RPP, District of Critical Planning Concern(,DCpC") implementingNegulqtions, municipal developlpe16l b5rlaws, and Commission-certifiedLocal ComprenensiveFt'gislitCp"). The Commission mu*X E{po find that the probable benefit fromthe Project ls grgaErr San tbe pr$pable detrimqtt'r f I c I A LM U N rcr PAt DEVELO PME NTqlaAfug LcP, AN D DC Pc CONSSft fiCfF17. There are no DCPC implementing regulations applicable to the Project'F1g. The Town of yarmouth's current Local Comprehensive Plan (LCPIwas adopted in 2001, lt statesthat telecommunlcations infrastructure would be dealt with via future planning efforts. The Townhas an undated inventory of potential sites for wireless communications towers, but none of theidentified sites are proximate to the coverage gap that has been identified'F1g.1 Beginning in 2020, the Town of Yarmouth has been engaged in a Visioning Process anddevelopment of a draft Vision Plan, which sets forth updated planning goals for theTown, including improvements to the Route 28 corridor. The Vision Plan is expected toprovide a foundation for updating the Town's LCP, but this update has not yet beenimPlemented or adoPted.F1 9. The Project will require a Special Permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals, Design Review' Siteplan Review, and any other non-land use town permits, such as permits for the propane tanks,from the Town of Yarmouth.F20. The project site is withln the Business District (82) and also in the Village centers overlay District(vcoD) Village center 3](vc3). This.is an optional overlay district to incentivize redevelopment ofRoute 2g while requiring strict design standards. The Applicant has not elected to seek approvalpursuant to the ViOo zining; accoldingly those provisions of the Bylaw do not apply to theFroject. Wireless communications towers may be allowed in any zoning district, but areencouraged on existing structures and sites designated by the Town. Section 408 of the Bylawestablishes detailed gJO"linuu including, but not limited to, the siting, design, and screening of,r,l. ffi:::jilill,'J* Jffiireress communication towers may be permitted in the 82zoning district only under a Special Permit issued by the Zoning Board of Appeals ('ZBA')' The ZBAmay alter or waive one or more of the requirements of Section 408 if it finds that the alteration orwaiver of the requirement(s) will not derogate from the intent of the Bylaw. Based on the currentdesign, required waivers may include, but are not limited to, the requirement that the wirelesscommunication tower:. Be designed and sited to have the least visual effect on the environment (S 408'7'1Io Not be located within open areas that are discernable from public roads '.. or residentialdeveloPment (5 408.7,5.1 );Blue sky Towers Re-submission, south Yarmouth, MA - commission File No. 2101 2Development of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2022 - Page 4
aBk 34927 Ps319 #9989Be no higher than 10 feet above the average height of trees or buildings within 300 feetof the proposed hcltrty or surrounding tree cal{ofo F 408'7.6'2); andaProvlde a veset&eU byqt lufficient.dtt".$"dp $"yiO5 vfar-round screening (5408.7.ft.s.F r c l-'"t'c oPY coPYRPP CONSISTENCYREVIEWF22. TheCommission revierAh&hT Project relative to the 2dil8Q-PF and companion Technical Bulletins,which were those in effe0t *l the time the Commission c&n}frenced substantive hearing on thepro,lu.t. Under g3.g'"ng 6tSr&#, Ehe commisi# #s&sEs {h&r&iect's consistency with theRpp by determining vlffieQr# tFle ProJect is consistent fiiitfl tRe fioals and objectives in the RPP thatare deemed applicable, material and regionally significant with respect to the Project. Thecompanion Tecirnical Bulletins assist in elaborating and interpreting the RPP's goals andobjectives.F23. The Rpp goals and objectives specifically referenced in this section of the Decision and discussedin detail below are those determined to be applicable, material, and regionally significant withrespect to the Project and are thus subject to RPP consistency review'F24, Subject to the Conditions set out in this Decision, the Project is consistent with the RPP goals andobjectives and with the corresponding provisions from the Technical Bulletins, as discussed indetail below, and as such the Project is consistent with the RPP'water ResourcesF25. The Water Resources Goal of the RPP is to maintain a sustainable supply of high-quality untreateddrinking water and protecL preserve, or restore the ecological integrity of Cape Cod's fresh andmarine surface water resources. Water Resources Objectives WR1, WR2, and WR4 are applicableand material to the Project:r Protect and preserve groundwater quality (WR1);r Protect, preselve, and restore freshwater resources (WR2); ando Manage and treat stormwater to protect and preserve water quality (WR4)'F26. The primary source of nitrogen will be from stormwater runoff. Staff reviewed the proposedstormwater system and found it consistent with WR4, and thus the ProJect is consistent with WR1,F27. While the project is located within a Fresh water Recharge Area, there is no septic systemproposed and the Project Site does not contain shoreline to a pond or lake.F2g. Commission staff has reviewed the project plans and stormwater report, and the system isappropriately sized and designed consistent with Objective WR4'F29. The project is located in the Crowell Pond Freshwater Recharge Area. To meet WRz, the Project isrequired to prevent loading of nutrients and other contaminants to freshwater resources.F30. Nltrogen loading from the Project will be generated only by stormwater runoff from imperviousareas. The impervious ar.", proposed are the stone compound area, which would contain theground equipment and monopole, and the gravel.F31, Because no wastewater generation or fertilization is proposed or anticipated, the Project isexpected to be well below the 5 ppm sitewide nitrogen loading concentration limit.Btue Sky Towers Re-submission, South Yarmouth, MA - Commission File No, 21012Development of Regional lmpact Decision - January 2022 - Pate 5
Bk 34927 Pg32o #9989F32. The Applicant has proposed two (2) backup emergency generators and a transformer' Theproposed backup genelFtor frrel will be propane, posing liolqto no risk of groundwatercontamination. fh! tranffoNner will use biodegradable eKrd'non-toxic fluids'FICIAL OFFICIALCOPY COPYofthe RPP is to conserve, pieserve, or enhance a network of open spacee fFgF46 natural and communitygeqpqces and systems' Open Spacese$sgp protecr or provide open snscRappropriate to context, is applicableopen Space o FF33, The OPen SPace Goalthat contributes to thObjective OS3, whichandmaterialto6frq'Ppjeft'c t e I O F F I C I A LF34. The Area of Developnfrrp trfiplLt for purposes of the frSi€dtpen space mitigation' excludingarea used for naturalized elements of the stormwater management systems' is 12'000 sf'F35. projects in Suburban Development Areas are required to provide high-quality open space in aratio of 1:1 on-site, offsite, or by cash contribution'F36. The Applicant previously committed to a cash payment to the Town of Yarmouth to provide openspace and meet objective os3. A payment in lieu of the provision of restricted open space land isappropriate given tle relatively smallArea of Development lmpact for the Project and the Project's' location in a highly developed area'F37. Based on the current per-acre open space mitigation figure of $125'951 for the Town of Yarmouth'the .28-acre Development lmpact Area results in a required payment of $35,266'CommunitY DesignF38.The Community Design goal of the RPP is to protect and enhance the unique character of theregion,s built and nriuIt environment based on the ]ocal context. community Design objectivescD1 and CD3 are applicable and material to the and material to the Project:. Promote context-sensitive building and site design (cD1); ando Avoid adverse visual impacts from infrastructure to scenic resources (CD3)'F3g. The proposed site abuts a mature wooded area on two sides and is set back from Route 28roughly 125 feet, behind an existing paved parking area. lt is set back from Forest Roaduppio*i*"t"ly 165 feet and is sited behind an existing church and parking area'F40. The proposal has been modified to include significant improvements to landscaping, including theuse of a stockade fence.F41 . The Applicant provided photosimulations of the proposed monopole from vantage pointsidentified by the commission. Even at the reduced height the tower will be highly visible alongsegments of Route 2g in South yarmouth and at approaches to the intersection of Route 28 andForest Road,F42. Iheproposed tower will be visible in the distance from some locations in the south YarmouthNational Register Historic District, specifically areas on the west end of Old Main Street wherethere are crossroads that provide views to the north'F43. The proposed towei will be visible in the distance from circuit Road near swan Pond but wouldhave a very smail presence in the viewshed because of its distance from that site'Blue Sky Towers Re-submission, South Yarmouth, MA - Commission File No' 2101 2Development of Regional lmpact Decision - January 2O22 - Page 5
Bk 34927 Ps32L #9989F44. The tower will be highly visible from adjacent locations with large public parking areas and tomotorists using Roule aS Oltmn roughly Va-milefrom tirts S{le.lHowever, the revised proposalincludes several changesftot{he design and site that reduAe tfre visibillty and overall silhouette ofthe tower. The eortd,lrbslr€oll sdhalhr frames tharn$uDt Sreln do$er to the tower, resulting in ashorterandnarrowerQr6tilP'Y C O P YF45. While not as consistentfy r6rrryw as a concealed antenrlq t6oryRole (CAM), the vjsual impact toregionat resources rronA"p\$roposed mulu-carrie.r mojigF3le may^not be significantly greaterthan if each carrier;wEeio iirsprrpilriple cAM6algn6,tr'r &s. fr8gorridor, similar to the oneinstalled by VeriTon'afio$; F$eTBTrom this Site' c o p yF46. The project is unlikely to have any significant visual presence in the historic district due to itsdistance from the district and due to the density of Luildings and mature vegetation that obscuremost views to it. Further, the surroundlng locations are not designated scenic roads or scenicvistas, and there are many other man-made features in the viewshed that would obscure ordistract from the ProPosed tower,Capital Facilities & lnfrastructureF47 . rhe capital Facilities & tnfrastructure Goal of the RPP is to guide the development of capitalfaciljties and infrastructure necessary to meet the region's needs while protecting regionalresources. Capital Facilities & lnfrastructure Objective CAP2, which seeks to coordinate the sitingof capital facilities and infrastructure to enhance the efficient provision of services and facilitiesthat iespond to the needs of the region, is applicable and material to the ProjectF4g. Based on the materials provided by the Applicant, the Project is infrastructure that would improvecellular service in the area of the proposed site, in response to the needs of the region'F49. Wireless network connectivity is influenced by many factors, including proximity to a cell site,physical obstacles and signal interference. Wireless service can be affected by severe weather,iopograpfricalfeatures, or large structures or other objects between a phone and the nearest cellsite.' ,rO. The Applicant suggests that T-Mobile and AT&T have identified a significant gap in wirelesscoverage in tfris aiea of yarmouth. The Applicant identified the proposed site as the only feasiblelocation to close T-Mobile's and AT&Ts significant gap'F51 . The project would improve cellular coverage in Yarmouth for T-Mobile and AT&T, and includesspace for two additional carriers.F52, The commission retained a wireless consultant to review the claimed coverage gaps as requiredunder Technical Bulletin 97 -401'Consistency with Technical Butletin 97-001: Guidetines for DRI Review of Wlreless CommunlcatlonTowers (Revised SePtember 2010)F53. TheCommissionretainedawirelessconsultant,DavidMaxsonoflsotropeWir'bless,LLC(,,lsotrope',) to assist the Commission in the review of technical data, including the coverageanalysis provided by the carriers, T-Mobile and AT&T'Blue s(y Towers Re-submission, south Yarmouth, MA - Commission File No. 21012Development of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2022 - PageT
Bk 34927 Ps322 #9989F54. lsotrope reviewed the data and found that a significant gap in coverage does exist for T-Mobileand AT&T. Dish has alsN eopressed interest in location Dh Chqtower as it seeks to build out its newwirelessnetwork. A N A NF55. tn consuttation fi,itf, cSrrfi"Esi-lntt*f, tsotropePostifre{pfte}ti$ Jfternate locations awav fromthe Route ru .orr,oor-i"#i lfi"Yooou.""i piiluo rerfro'?t.E o'l( thotu tocations. lt is likely that theidentified locations wogJd-5ejlher be available nor prefere5tilt to the proposed site'F56. rsotrope's review 0.,"fr3gd-,hat the proposed gap coug qfrirt.o with multiple concealedantenna monogrlg t$nlllt gf ongf,hgRoute 28 carrfdqr, gro$dflgqirXilar effectiveness itl closingthe coverage gtft ti t6e fing"y1onopole propoiect. lqgtrOpp rqted that because CAMs may belimited to one or two carriers, more CAMs may be t"qiit*O ln in ar"a to provide the same level ofservice as a tower'F57. The Commission does not review cAMs of less than 80'in height. This inherent preference withinthe Commission regulations was weighed against the impacts of alternatives to the Project inrelation to regiOnally signlficant resources, However, the use of CAMs may be preferential inrelation to local tetortiet when the proposal is reviewed at the Town level'FS7.1 The project does not require any waivers under the Wireless Technical BulletinRegio na I 8e netits/ D etri me ntsF58. Probable benefits of the Project identified include:o The project will address identified wireless coverage and capacity problerns along the .Route Z-g corridor, providing needed service to a varlery of users including area residents,the traveling public, and visitors who rely on such services for emergencycommunications, to operate their businesses, and to communicate with friends andfamily either at home or in their vehicles. wireless communications are used by many. homeowners who have eliminated land lines and use of multiple wireless platformscreateshighdatademandthatWillbeservedbytheProject.r The project provides opportunities for other national wireless carriers to site-share onthe proposed WCI poientially eliminating or limiting the future need for additionalwireless towers in the area.F59. Probable detriments of the Project identified include:o The project may have visual impacts along the Route 28 corridor, with more acuteimpacts to properties in irnmediate proximity to the Site'. The project may not be consistent with localvisioning and planning efforts currentlyunderwiy to improve the visual chaiacter of the Route 28 corridor.CONCLUSIONBased on the Flndings above and subject to the Conditions set out below, the Commission furtherdetermines, finds, and concludes that thd Project is consistent with the 2018 Cape Cod Regional Policyplan, applicable provisions from the Yarmouth LCP, and applicable municipal development bylaws; theprobable benefit of the project is greater than the probable detrimenU there is not substantial evidencein the record to warrant a denial under the standards of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996;Blue sky Towers Re-submission, south Yarmouth, MA - Commission File No. 21012Development of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2022 -Page8
Bk 34927 Pg,323 #9989and the Commission hereby grants DRt approval for tlre Blue Sky Towers South Yarmouth Re'submissionProjectdescribedherein. NoT NOTCONDITIONS AN ANOFFICIAL OFFlC]ALcl. This Decision st',utt ngrioulnvhpn the appeal period sd @tin iection 17 of the cape codcommission Act has "ruprua without appeal (or if such an appeal has been filed, when the appealhas been finally settle$ dFnissed' adjudicated' or othxrwisqdisposed of in favor of theApplicant). Thereafter, tfti$pecision shall be valid and irr4effsct, and local development permitsmay be issued puFsuFnqhqetr hrE period of OewlnyearsdronAh€Ldate of this Decision' or forsuch extendeO peiioOaOruay$e permitted by the Cqncispiog pursuant to the EnablingRegulations.C2. A copy of the Decision, when final and prior to commencement of the Project' shall be recordedwith the Barnstable Registry of Deeds.C3, This Decision shall be appurtenant to and run with the Property. The Decision shall bind and beenforceable against, and'inure to the benefit ol the Applicant, its heirs, successors, and assigns'C4, The Applicant shall obtain all required federal, state, and local permits' licenses' and approvalsfor the Project, including without limitation Site Plan approval, a Special Permit' and anynecessary waivers under the Yarmouth Zoning Bylaw. Consistency with Municipal DevelopmentBylaws shall be ratified and confirmed by the nppficant obtaining all said reqtlired local permits,licenses, and approvals for the Project, Prior to commencement of the Project, the Applicant shallprovide the Commission with copies of all required local permits, licenses, and approvals for thebroject. Any changes to the project resulting from the municipal review process may requiremodification of this Decision'C5. The project shall be constructed, operated, and maintained consistent with the foltowingdocuments ('Approved Project Plans"). Plans, protocols, and other documents received orrequired to be submitted as conditions of this Decision shallbe treated as incorporated into theApproved project plans once received, reviewed, and approved for consistency with this Decisionby commission stafl and the proJect shallthereafter be constructed, operated, and maintainedconsistent with the Approved ProJect Plans, as so supplemented:e plan set entitled ,,Site Name: South Yarmouth, Site Number; MA-5104, Address: 1044Route 2g, south yarmouth, MAA2664', consisting Of 11 Sheets, prepared byJesse Moreno'ProterraDesignGroup,LLC,finalrevisiondatedl0125/2021C6. The Applicant shail provide a copy of this Decision and the Approved Project Plans to the Projecfsgeneral contractor prior to commencement of the Project. The Applicant shall maintain a copy ofthis Decision and the Approved project Plans on the Project Site throughout Project construction'C7. prior to and as a Condition to issuance of a building permiVs for the Project from the Town ofyarmouth, the Applicant shall request and obtain fiom the Commission a Preliminary Certificateof Compliance; ti-re issuance of such Preliminary Certificate of Compliance evidences that theApplicant has satisfied all Conditions in this Decisiorr required to have been satisfied prior to theissuance of a local building permit/s.cg. prior to and as a condition to issuance of a certificate/s of Use and occupancy or building permitsign-off/s for the project from the Town of Yarmouth Building Department, the Applicant shallBlue Sky Towers Re-submission, south Yarmouth, MA - commission File No' 21 012Development of Regional lmpact Decision -January 2022 -Page 9
Bk 34927 Ps324 #9989request and obtain from the commission a Final cenificate of compliance; the issuance of suchFinal certificate of cofipfrrlEe evidences that the Applib#t fias satisfied all conditions in thisDecision required to f,rh" Neen satisfied prior to the issAartte of a local Certificate/s of Use andOccupancy or fuiBift f,er€tlt3 $nEoff/s, and gaFcdhffrncthlt frrdProject was constructed orimplemenied in accdd$re ffth this Decision' C O P YC9. The Applicant herebYtimes and uPonimplementedCertificate ofinc8onableliance by the Commission,to the Town of Yarmouth toCOPYC10. Prior to and as a condition to issuance of a Final Certificate of Compthe Applicant shall make a cash contribution in the amount $35,266support acquisition and conservation of open space'C1 1. All proposed backup generators shall be propane fueled'c12. Transformer fluids used onsite shall be biodegradable and non'toxic.SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWSBlue sky Towers Re-submission, south Yarmouth, MA - commission File No. 21 012bevelopment of Regional lmpact Decision - Jahuary 2022 - Page 1 0
Bk 34927 P9325 *9989*oort sIGNATURE PAGENOE'FICTALExecuted rn', ldb aav oF ffinYa?,-zozzFor the Cape Cod ComrnissionxPYl 1OTANOFEICIALCOPYAN'NOTANOFFIC]ALCOPYIALPYSignature,J i1",l"l'"t/tPrint Name and TitleCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTSBarnstable, ss2022Before me, the undersigned notary public, personally ain his/her capacity asand on behalf of the Cape Cod Commission, whosename is slgned on the precedlng or aftached document, and such person acknowledged to me thathe/she signed such document voluntarily for its stated purpose, The identity of such person was provedto me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was I J photographic identification withsignature issued by a federal or state governmental agency, [ ] oath or affirmation of a credible witness'or [X] personal knowledge of the undersigned'PublicMy Commission ExPiresilarlao.-t_f_l$ll$lltE nBBAY 0t 0EED8lohn F. irleado' RegisterBlue 5ky Towers Re-submission, south Yarmouth, MA - commission Flle No. 21012Development of Regional lrnpact Decision - January 2Q22 - Page 11llsA p.01u.0[*-S#JE&-ilrfrnm]llt$SCran8tt0,l0l0
11
Revlew le:Revlew le bv;tr ConcePlual E Formaltr Blndlng (404 MofelrMCOD/R.O.A.D. Projec{) E Non'blnding (All othercommercial prolects)E ehglipS-Bglrd B Dqglon Revlcw CommlttsoDE tofl nwtEw Gonnq't| SHEET50189.11TownYarmouth28,(19gf r 19ncent5r03on a motlon by charlte Adams, secondd by chrlswncent, the Destgn Rer?4ew commlttee (DRc) voted (*oiti'iiiiiir-in" Jun" 14, 2022 DRC meettns at 5:a3 PFtt'?ralcrlt SummarvitrsfiilrF*flii1kil}ffipiROAD and vcoD VC3. The Appricant is proping;;;;;iil;itiio, taliro*pore Goirmunica*on Toner foruo to four caniers with accessory ground equrpment] E,rypr"rr*"t materu-ts travi been provrded frorn the 4/5/22oRc meering showing ;;#durc* ioinir d#iilffiffi;i;." " cucriowei, and a irore detarsd artarnativesiting analYsis.ffi ff;i;J*:il:t,j;iiai!fr i!#ji.l.,*,r[lffi ]r,JlxilllT,*lll,':ffi '$"*"tr:incruded supprementar ,llii.ii"i, ii6r;-ilill;ihrratel cbcr toyer io hroe $re anrennas, and can includecrocks on a, three sides. He noted the prroto-ermuuidn' ai touiiocationg "no war rooking for feedback from theOnb. U" also noted the revlssd project plane'DRC Ougrtlqnc & Diicuttlone:chrrs Vrncent ilkes the 3{egged concept and wourd rike to see three crocke on it. Attomey sousa also noted thiecould be a focalPoint ln Town.charlie Adams asked if the clocke were operatlonal, and Attorney sousa eaid they would be'steve o,Neir asked if antennas wourd be rocated behind the crock paners and the materiar for the side panels'Attorney sousa indrcatiiiiJ liitdi.t-"d. wouro oe iicaiel o"iiino, using. a radio ir;quency (RF) transparent material'sean Gormrey rndrcarEd the paner materiar *"i'i6iiir"t. anir t g-r"sr "* riae oiri or bteer' The crock is aspecrar crock made to "tto* nF rrequency- ro g" rid;t-ii*[1. lrri g'lri1i asieo about backrightins or tttuminatlonof the crock to be seen at nrght, sean Gormrevinau"t"f rt" is not sure ii the crock can be backlit' Mr' o'Neilapprectated trytng to wor[ on ftre Oesign to camoi,ffiiiri a1t911as, ?y!y"t not convlnced this ls the best locatlonand was less impressed wlth tho alternailve "nliiJrl.'H" i"it tn",, toof me pait of least resietance' and could
reaoh our torhe rown on rown'own"o prypqry,,?iffi,l1yp?lu?f,:1J,1i$t"fi$;.nuillliuiilifi,iii;ftlr,nii:lin,3ig,n:'lf,lfr!!!i,ifa;,#ild;;; nce{e! to=rii,iidrr":* ip "1*,"'" ail aomc s*esthat mlsht be vlabte, especta'y rhe Davenporr p",iiJii5J,iliii'i; il;iil roil'nJ*'ta ltxe to 'se more effort atioot<ing-at other sites bceides thls one'charlre Adams doee not feer enough has been done on findrng another rocatron. As far as the desrgn is concemed'wourd be rn favor ot more ot a co-roniar atvre eimiliio'"n" -ot rne exampiei'ltiiitt"J[tiadb bft) as the DRcsilir.ilVl""rt for cape cod style archltecturc'sohair usmanr showed the prot coverage maps.Ior the area incruding g9 Buck rsrand Road whrch did not cover thearea needed, ne noteo ttrif arso rooked at ottrer ettes and coverage *;ii'r,ia'n"ight scenarios as part of theCape Cod Commisslon Process'ChrisVlncentindlcatedhewaeokaywiththelocationduetothecorerageneeds.charrie Adams asked about the tower rocated across the street at the post of,ce' Attorney sousa noted that thespacrns insrde the,n,r,i'ol!iri-dnvi-t."ii*alii i'iilJ:".; rirni,p"rdr .i^:i'Joi't"iii moriern.so antennae andorovide a, needed ,"r"L""1'nrJo, Vcrrion r, "tir,'"iii'"lia inJ rofr.t iJ;i;;;ffioi s"ru" the needs of AT&Tlnd T-Mobile ano woutiiGtow161 5G coverage, sotirey chosa a dlffcrcnt design'Aftornov sousa noted that tha oavenports.received a certifled rriair and spoko in oppoeition to the cape codcommiieion onr. Kathvfrilrffi, ;;e';i;trora ;jr*i"Jt-iJJirttrorm.atigi dt-t:h; b"ubhporte fgr the appllcant toconradthem. s""neol,irl,,'ilft'rrd;;rra *il;Liiri;al;;p:*'Lr"i'op"*iesiga &4). Karhv w*amsqueatoned the tnablity io;&il"-th"'fi.1t.91#"ffiinJft*f r"n ir'-"v-ri'*"eo'X-fr""ii'J3,trr1i,;i=:Hlorocess and has gon" ft;'lgi ;" CipJi"d commioslon wlth a favoratltt.ugL the alternative sltes that were r€I/teweq'Dick Martrn noted that he understands th€ n€ed ror coverage in the area. and doasn't thrnk thls ls a bad eite, butwourd *ke to 66e as ,.''uJn nufio as possibre "J ft;ffiJ'"u*nt' n"*rri'li.il"d' -He atso felt 110' is tall andh:ln':'r*"i$tnry1ql';ilp#ffif***i:;:t*:.;s,trfrtrI!ffiffiiliil; tb modifv the design' Mr' Martin.aef[:*:ll":;X#:"1il; ni'Go""nloo*ins mav be to the west andio noiu ii"u" errioins "ni"nii' 'riiip"'tv 4'; nf'ily8llrlfff',f,:,1n height was reduce! j1J 1 d' "ii"iov, ana3;l$ il1#:llflf:"tf [T"t"fi'#i,,0*il;:'il*ili ,,ii]iJ riii" u'" io*Ei to oe more attrac-trve ir need thrslocailon and helght'soha* Usmani noted that the three-srded deergn ie needed as_the antennas transmrt rn three direcrione' so thisflte wer wrth a 3-regsJfi,J,iri'i-r"gs"o "ruJtlirJ."ii!?Jr*r.r"s ar"'rri,iai iranemissrone' Kathv wlliameehared hcr version or tfi" j;;'ig-n Liifr""=nt" *r,idh'fui*ein" to'io t" r;i;lil"* rign tike (see attached) andsugsested orien*ng tnl'ffiftil#;9 ,.;r ffi iiuL l,ili"""ring.w"s'frJrd. 'l"ir-"-uor"ni said the 3-lesseddesign meats rhe "n.ini-*irt"ti ano r,e.rrre?'rlliilii' ""i rp 6 nr*iiiir"p.i"rr9.n' eo tuming tt mav lmpacttheRFcoverage,lneapplicantlndicatedtr..rriioiiiiJn"$zeiiorientingthe3.leggedlayout.Mr, Mar*n rnquired about the randscaping pran and asked about the cirores on the plan facing Route 28' Jeeseiirrot"* not",ithose are proposed bushes'srflNG STEATEGEqSect, 1. Streetscage E rulR n Meels standards' or tl Dlscrepancles:There are no new buttdtngs proposed whtch courd be rocated adJacentto rhe roadway to define t,'e $treetsctpe'
Seot. 2. Tenant Soaces I N/A tr Meels Stendards' or E Diecrepanclee:Sect, 3. DcffnE Strset Edoe I rulR n Meets $tendarde' or E Dls$epanclee:sEct.4.ghieldLaroeBulldinosEN/AtrMeetestandards.orEDlecfepanclee:Sect, 5, Deslgn a 2nd Storv E N/A tr Meets Standards' or E Dis$epanclee:sect, 6. use Tooo to screen New Develooment B tltn n Meets Standarde' or E Diecfepanclee:SeoJ. 7. Landscaoe Buffers/Screenlno n N/A n Meets $landards, or E Dlscrepancigs:ft ts tmpocclble to landscapa/buflvr a ll0, towar. tf thta locatlon ts detomtnad to be the only vlableopfion, con{nue b ";;;;ffi;;;;;i;"rs;ih;'"iiii io*", aasea oi ine commente trom the DRCmeetlng.fhe ground aqutpment and transformer 1\ould be fully screenod wlth plants large eno'ugh to screenthe tattect equtpment';;;;;a;t itr;ins. noii or ini i,,t"ttng treal itoig the north.and west sldes o/the tower shourd be ailovwd to-be removeo ""-rJng r-" tniiiifrriii n ptaie as the*trees provrde somelan dsc aPe bulferln glsc roen I ng,Reolaceanvdordetregtlrelg,andlns.rlllnewtreesevery20,(wherepossible}alongRoute2EandForestRoad';;E:;tp-Jrt{,ri the strcet age and bulfer the proPeilv'Fenctng around the egutpment area should be cedar'Sect.8'ParkinoLotVbibllitytrntnnMeets$tandards'orEDle6{epanclee:sect. g, Break uo Laroe Parkinq Lots E N/A n Meots $tandarde, or0 DlecrepancieE:Sect'10.L@atoUtili$esUnderoroundnN/AtsMeotr$landarde,orEDigcrepanc.ieslSect.ll.ShleldLoadinoArgas&N/AtrMeetsstandards,or0Discrepancles:ffi r&,[ii{::ffiFr'#r#ini#*{#!ffi!r-iWi{ri:tr{x$ect. 1. Break Down Building Mass - Multiole Bldos. E N/A tr Mectc $landardc' or [1 Dbcrepandee:B N/A n Meete $tandards' or trl Dlscrepancles:Sect. 3, Varv Facade Lines B run n Meets Standards' or D Discrepancies:Sect.4;VarvWallHeightreErulRnMeetcstandardg'ortrDlecrepancler:Sect. 5. Varv Roof Llnes E t{A g Meets Standards' or I DiecrepanciealSect' 6..Brino Down Bulldino Edoes E rutn n Meets Standards, or fl Discrepancles:sect. 7. Varv Buildino MatlS For Deoth tr run n Meets standards' or E Discrepancies:Sect' 8.' Use Traditional & Nat,l, Building Mat'ls El rulR n Meets Slandards, or I Dlecrepancies:sect, 9. lncoroorate Pedsstrian-ecaled Featqres tr N/A E Meots standards' or E Dlscrepancles:E N/A n Meets Standards' or E Discrepanclesl
NoxtstcpforepplrcgnlBGotoS[ePlanFtevtewllR€tumtoDtlignRevnwforFormalRevewOn a molton by Chrts Wnaenl, seconded by.Chattle Adams' Itle Dgdlgn Rgvlew Commtttee (DRC) valcd (t'0) to,pprcvo these DRc c;;;i;;;-;c ,9&ns.;;^;;;'i;;'lni 1,i,7 .ii,'-ibii i'ettns for'the proposodcommunlcaltons towor ond ground equtp^"nt "t"iii Route 2C, Soutfi Yarmoulh'ffi fi#:WI (r;,f,2ATTACHlttEl,lTS to Jun0 11,to22Meotlng (elso relerto Aprll6, 2022 me€tlng meterlrlr)r June l1t}OzzAgonda. 4t5t22ORG Commrnt Shcet: ;;ril.plei or can Towsr Clocts from Amarlcloclt. cinilpi" for Towcr - Yarmouth Plannlng Dlvlrlon. DRC Appllcrtlon:- 1- 'ii{i ii, iomlctter from Attorncy Rlcrrdo Eoumo ptroto stmulr$on of ctock Iow_c-l, riiii""ru"t" ol exl$lng rnd propored: nnHm3fi"n;t#l"J5l|';r"rjli, prorcrra rleErsn Group, LLC, dated Aprrr 29, 2022' 3P - Ovcrall $lts Plan. Pg-l - P.rtld Slta Plrn' P8'2 - PrrtlrlSltc Pleno stre d""itf*[*';t:ff:1"& prorcr' oertgn eroup, LLC, drted 6tl2tz2unlcsg otherwlaenotrd:T-l: Tltle Sheet;:i; d;iiiliirn a Exlsting condftlont' drtod lnl20-laA-l: Asrlrl I U36S tllrPA-2: ComPllcd Plot PltnA-3: Ovrrrll Slte PlenA.i: comPound Plrn & ElcvationA-6: Phntlng PllnSE-l: Sltlng ElsvetlontO-l: DctrllrCri io cAa: Co"APPllcant octrllreb--i:-eioeron contiil Plrn E oetalls
Cell Tower Clocks Photo Gallery\aI.*coock.m/g a I lery/cel l-tower-clocks/https://americl\.dka'1StlIgT
O\a {crffi {Cw rS i1 .d .aaRrrY P:ftn€Els rF cA-: NiFffi Crffin :GirtM€rrli4nt oa:itr9 |tl- S,D?;\s -/:J 4E ,T:-;€i.cc';C€P(CONCEPTS - CLOCK TOWER CON$IDERAfi ON 6114IZ2 -Yarmouth Planning Divisiol,-,-., :er i-sogtt li:-:r atuPN(xr AikHD tr\q:r,/ rp^Nerprilr sHRtf,-\ tr a:*' a.!: itu'Pv5\r 3earh{J pr{1}Y;u^sPr{{! eRtuo!EtJ s{ std^t& naoefo 'F^r[c{^If, iF) l rrll a{tilnrSJ Cs 9io*rn* 5co?do t€[itldAE f) t l^u Atrl€s^!r': r^{al :AC€ rrtIItiEaIIPEI2t-la{a31I5I:I:2iFl Ai&i (:, d ffu0t!1;95.(laBiPlrA€':C ir) r\{qoucr ?usr--ri to{i |.tclP) tofi lio i? t .'9). tCr!- qornir: e !€i r0 i r:c(Pl ti;ffio cMrr-aorio^- N ;&xc el$Lisd 4oEf*rl <PN:iBYELEVATPil'rd=il:j;=-
SITE PLAN REVIEW COIIIMENT SHEETFormal iReviewParcel: 189.1MDate: Ju20221B-21044 RomaPeProiect SummaryPYFGProposed wireless telecommunication facility monopole communication Tower and ground equipment'/a)\ Gomments@)rrrro,ns: property is located in the 82 zoning district Proposal for a 110' cell tower witl require relief from several::t-fn:ltl,"""i?,:il:"P,{iil" ro"n oryarmourh by speciar permit per section 4a8'4 otthe Zonins Bvlaw rrom the ZoningBoard of APPeals.Section 4a8,4,.states that the ZBA may altgr or waive one or more requirements of section 408 if it finds that thearteration or waiver of the requirements wirr'ioi;r';;;t- iil.il." inL"nililh;;td* Applicant requested severalwaivers from certain sections of the zoning byr?yrll*appri"ationio'#ri.H;;;ipoie ot spR ib to identify plans that;"n:y.::$: fi:f;'##,#',iff[*iffii:,tJlx''3ff?1ll'i6t]i"- sha' be requested direcrv from the ZBA from theforowing sections. The pro,ced.ure ror tnisis nii ,r"ui, ho*"u6r, i *ouro'lruu*u ii tur"r prace in person at the hearing's""tio''t?og.o 3#1,#1c - Scaled plans.and tree cover'$ection 4A8,6.2*S'if '*O r"g"rOild locations of other personalwireless facilities'S""ii"t 408'6.3#2A - Sight line representation's;;iil 408,6.3 #2D - Visual impact photographs'a;;iil 408.6.3 #38 - security barrier cutawav view'Section 408.6.3 *eO f*i"tinb and proposed hee / planting heights';;;iil 408.6.3 #3E - Grade changes and contours'confirm with ZBA that the criteria ror aoe.o.i";;"d;ioon test) has been met or schedule with ZBA'anylnil,ti; HiffJl ?,:f311?lfx&Yil"3';'.",' : ryt ".?ylunication facitities shal be desisned and sifed so asto have the teast aiie,rse visuat effect on;;;;;;;;;;int. ontv seiilsiiiii'.''i iii'nie tvpe towers are permissibte''ii:::"i\i::r,ifr'f"3fffi8!"y3iil""::fr i.i!!!v\;i!-{'"i'":{i,.o'l!::fl"^on on another structure is not reasibreivGfit"* sooo t"iih "ii;rt to co-locite per 408'7'3'1#'s 1'2'3'section 408.7.3.2- Applicant must provide *riti"n *iui"t"ni tnut co{ocation is not feasible to the ZBA'ffl,gt, f:::t;H,y[###T;l*:l*mffi^J#J':fl".1'33lr"i;1'ted pwsF shar not project hisherthan tenfeet above or tree canopySection 408'7,8 ratl zanes' Communication towers, whether frea,standing or p'art of another structure or building, must beset back from art property tines oy at teast'tn'Jiiii'iiisit or tne, toii'r"i,r'rt*Ltu," and its .apaurtenances' lt is not clear atthis time if far zonescan incrude parking J;;;;;ffpi"o nriruingl'# t"nl"*itt lroperty i could not locate a lightinggil'?fi'rB:T::fl1"",1i:fi:i"1,""',';JJ;1pr?r:rir"jp,'ri*,""'::Hl?:"i?1":i JtrJ?iylli":fi:il:ffiJ*,ff'section 408. 1 0. section 408.1 1 requires-insf ediion oy owners "*p"rilungiri""i) uu"ry 2 years and that documentation to[e zuppfieO to the Building Department for the file'BlueToweiams
1 Communitv Development and Planning:.d ffiffi?o: ron,nn: Throughout the cape cod c_ommission Development of .Regional lmpact (DRl) process'. comment letters were submitted by the io*n-Fhnn"r, etanning-Bo"ro unl ro*n Adniinistrator expressing seriousconcerns about the height, tocation ano aestnltics of this cett to*"i'i,iJli!ni)/'uirinr" location within our main commercialcorridor. yarmouth is itriving to better itr;i1;;iih i"ievetopment oi ol,i Ro,ite i8 corridor beins front and center in ourplanning efforts. Through zoning, qrowl! irl"riirtion"s, bppottrniti t;;;,-tffi;p'll"n r'riastewater initiatives andMassDor streetscape improvementr, *u "r" concentrating i"rorr."i ,na *bn"y to'improve this corridor and create anenvironment that fosters investment. rnis iower io"i notiit witn o"u-iGion ior ow main commercial corridor' nor does itcompty with intent ii section +os ot orr roniig ovraw, iequiring tnuny tuiuers from these standards including:. 40g.7.1 General. All communications Facilities shall be designed and sited so as to have the least adversevisual effect on the environment'. 40g.7.8.1 scenic Landscapes and Vistas - personar wreless service Facilities shall not be located within openareas that are discernable from pufri"iJ"ot, recreationat areas' or residential development'C 408'7'6'1 Height, General. Regardless of the type of mount, Personal Wireless Service Facilities shall be nohigher than ien-f"ut abou* tne av-eragJ;;igr'i oi b'iiroings within 300 feet of the proposed facilitv'. 40g.7.6.2 Height, Ground-Mounted Facirities. Ground-mounted Personal wireless service Facilities shall notproject nigneiinan ten feet "nouJine;;;s; ruiruins il's;i';; it *rli" ut" no-buildings within 300 feet' thesefacilities "ilTitffi;d.inigh"ith"; t"n tu*tioo'e the average tree canopy height'. 40g.7.1e3 camouflage by Vegetation: lf communications Facilities are not camouflaged from public viewingareas by existing buildings o, structures, they shall be surrou-ndl;iv-nutt"t* gf delse tree growth and understoryvegetation in ari directions to create an effective y""-ou-ni'iLu"inrtr"t. Ground-mounied Personal wirelessservice Facilities shall provide a vegetated buffer of suffici"ni n"brrt ""0 aepttr to effectively screen the facility'The tower is highlv visible due to its height and the removal of the taller trees along the south and east side of the tower'essentialty creatin! un op"n area and "fi*in'alinf ufl significant.s#ft; ft'"* noilt* Ze and some of Forest Road Theproposed prantingi wi1 onry screen tn" gr;i;';quipm""ntwhicn is"iJ'iiouseo insioe a structure' but is ground mountedin a fenced in area (screening or tne pao moiltu'd transformer a;;;;i;#;li oJ dead buffer tree shoutd also beprovided), *,e toiuliao"" not-.omprv *iffr ti," n",sht iequirementt iutt oliorte it is less than 200'' The bylaw says 10'above the tree rine, but in no ""r" **"""iiili6gYii" clse trere"a'rl-;;ry t"lii;; in the area), so a waiverwould berequired.Aesthetics: rt is impossibre to*camoufrage or screen a 110' tall cell tower which is further exacerbated by the removal ofthe tarer stand of trees arong Route 2g. nr'"tn-"i"pii"nwo.t1H ne io c"mourlage the tower in plain sight tb make it a focalpoint rather *ran visuit dutier. Howevur, in"'"ppiiranrs attempt ;; ;di;;;tk aesthetic concerns-of this highly visiblesite by designing the tower to 'murate " .ro.[-ti*"r' is highry inai;il;;; ihe oesign,as presented reads rike a largesign from a freeway and racks the appropriii"l"*i"i o"t"irJ "nc o"iidn eiuments. lt iiaho referred to as a church toweron the site ptans and no clocks are shown.-without it neing propertv iaid^"0, the larger''clock tower" may end up havingmore negative visuar impacts, with three i^isi z.s,diameiei.supdri;;i;;;i tnr""1+' *ide x 42.5' rong "crock' faces'rather than an obvious rnonopole cett towei"notn design options are ietrimentat to the goals the Town has been workingon for decades for enhance Route 28'Legal control: The Applicant needs.to |ave some form of legal control over the fall zones that also prohibits removal ofthe trees relied upon for screening in tnl" apprication materi"ar. ' pr*io" "r, ",u"t"nt for the stormwater swales andinfittrution basin, currently shown outside of any easement area'Application Analysis: The applican.t h.as previously discounted the use of a Concealed Antenna Monopole (CAM), use ofother existing towers, and ruled out other-alternative locations; "no rJr ur pi*io"o documentation on coverage gap andneed for the tocation and height. As this liiiiiJ"ii;'ir Ngrrr}, tr"rini""i in-r'Ltrr", the Planning Division recomme.nds thatthe Zoning Board of Appears engage., pTJi ieview or tie'speciai-F"lmit "pprication materlals using the provisions ofch.53c ano proiol'i;;;; ih; d"irct as part of the Hearing process.Conservatlon: Not present. A portion of the site is in the floodplain, coordinate with the Conservation Agent,DesisnRevlew:RefertotheattachedJune14,2022DesignReviewcommittee(DRC)Commentsheet'\t Enqineerinq:f \* . provide drainage calculations to support the drainage design plan'/ I ' Provide operation and maintenance plan'
. Flre: permits for fuel storage, lock box for gate, clear markings for gate access, some type of deterrent for^ ,lA6j6Et<ino access to ladder or ctimbing p.gt'to--dr"u"nt p-rso,is who may enter the fenced area'\Jvy,/-tlgallb: Not Present.Wg!g: No comments'LJRRead & Received bY APPllcant(s)
12
Formal ReviewSITE PLAN REVIEW COITIMENT SHEET50Parcel: 189.1Date: J192022ilLCZoneYaPersonsandaLt.Proiect SummaryProposed wireless telecommunication facility monopole communication Tower and ground equipment',/1^ comments@)""rrornq: property is rocated in the 82 zoning district. proposar for a 11.', cet tower wirr require rerief from severarffi::'l,".t"i:il3.P,ynliil" ro*n of yarmouth by speciar permit per section 408,4 or the Zoning Bvlaw rrom the ZoningDBoard of Appeals. ., ^,{^. ^F rements of section 408 if it finds that the5,*n[i:ltii::*;i:"1;l;'1'*ll3[iffi:i!y'x.;:,:il"lilil!1?,5'i!;;;bvr'* Appricant requesied severarwaivers from certain sections of the zoning nvru*"i,lYffi "ipiiJlii"^ i"'spil.ilffi;p"5; ot sin is to identifv ptans thatn"n:1,::1,: li',,'"',!|,.|*',rj|3lf;;6u:,t;':':l;:11l,ll3t!1,y ",111, o" requested directrv from the ZBA from theforowing sections. rn" pi"""ari" ro, tii, i, not "i"ui,-no*"uJr:i*ouro *ru*"li tukes prace in person at the hearing'S""tion aOA O 3 #1 ,#1C - Scaled plans.and tree cover'section 408,6.2*S a *oii"l;"Si'i"""ti"ri or ott.r"r personal wireless facilities'Section 408,6.3#2A Sight line representatlon' ,Section 408,6.3 #2D - Visual impact photograpns';;;i;;; ;08 6'a #ss - securitv barrier cutawav view's;;ii;; +oa.o e *so existinJ;nd proposed tree / plantins heights.i::m*|nggfii[,,,f" I'?:H?S,T'T8 i"#i[5i""' test) has been met or schedure w*h ZBAnnlllnt":*:l; Xffill,.?tr3Hi'ff?fgYil"8f,","' ryt ?onryu:!"-ation racitities shatt be desisned and sfted so asto have the least adverse visuar effect on tne eniiinii"nt. orty ,"rf-tup;;;ii;; iiiipiti tvpe bw6rs are permissibte'Lattice towers, ort tne utie'ir jrouna anchors.and/or guy wires are prohibitedrnaccordancewithsection qaal.rappricant-halori#n"rpioving*rat.Ji.rtrononanotherstructureisnotfeasible'ivir.t p-t"* good faith "rfo't to co-locite per 408'7'3 1#'s 1'2'3'Section 40g.7,g.2- Applicant must provide *titt"n titi**"niif'ut colocation is not feasible to the ZBA'f;n,[ll f{::t;HiltriX"#i*t;l*::ytffiff'd""Jffiit'331J'ii;nted pwsF sha'not proiect higherthan tenfeet above or tree canopy'Section 408.7.8 FatI zones, Communication towers, whethel .fye,standing or part of another.structure or building, must beset back from a, property lines by at teast tne toti'ieigit o.f th9.lower ll'"tu[tu'" and its appurtenances' lt is not clear atthis time if fa, zones can incrude parking "r"u. oi'orr,ipilo oritoing, on t-n""r#" froperty' i could not locate a lightinggf,l;"t:3::*i""J,i:f*iJ,t"trt;];i, , pl?l:I,io,to finarconstruction sign off rhe zfnwill{1o require a copv persection 408. 1 O. Section 408.1 1 requires insp..iffi ;; ;ff; eipert tengin"*ij "u"w 2 years and that documentation to["l,ippriii It the Building Department for the file'Jesse
dgommuniW Pevelopmen! and Planning:prannino Efforts .s Zonrng: Throughout the cape cod c_ommission Deveropment of Regionar rmpact (DRl) process'comment retters were submitted by the ro*n-Fi"n*r, ptanning eoard ;nii Town Rdministrator expressing seriousconcerns about the height, location and aesthetim Ji inis'ceri towei in " rtigily ;i.iote tocation within our main commercialcorridor. yarmouth is striving to better itserf, wiin i"i"u"rop*"nt ot our Rorite 28 corridor being front and center in ourptanning efforts. rnrorg'h';o"ni;g, 6r"*th ir;""til;;;;;, Spportunit]l zones, vision planning'.wastewater initiatives andMassDor streetscape rmprovements, we {e concenhating iesources "nJ *bn"y to'improve this corridor and create anenvironment that fosters investment. rnis rowei io". notiit *iit out vision for our mairi commercial corridor' nor does itcompty with intent of S""iion +iia oiou1- ioning bylaw, requiring many waivers from these standards including:c 40g.7.1 General. All Communications Facilities shall be designed and sited so as to have the least adversevisual effect on the environment't 40g.7.s.1 scenic Landscapes and Vistas - personar wireless service Facilities shall not be located within openareas that are discernable from puOtic rJads, recieationat areas, or residential development'.40E,T.6.lHeight,General.Regardlessofthetypeofmount'PersonalwirelessserviceFacilitiesshallbenohigher than t"n i"lt-roou" tn" "uir"g" r.r*,gl'ri'"i o','iiroing" within 300 feet of the proposed facility'.408.7'6.2Height,Ground-MountedFacilities.Ground-mountedPersonalWirelessServiceFacilitiesshallnotproject nigher ti;an ien reet above the ;;;;"s" ilit;i;g height oi irit'!t" ut" no. buildings within 300 feet' thesefacilities unaff noiproject nigner than ten feetibove the average tree canopy height': 40g.7,10.3 camouflage by Vegeiation: lf communications Facilities are not camouflaged from public viewingareas by existing buitdings or structures, t&;;i";;i;;;;iouno"o ov uuffers o-f dense tree orowth and understoryvegetation in aiiairectio-ns to create an effective year+ound,uisu"r'nrr"r. Ground-mounied Personal wirelessservice Facitities shail provide u uug"t"i"i ;rffuit "um.i"nil "igr,t and depth to effectively screen the facility'The tower is highry visible due to its height and the removal of the taller trees along the south and east side of the tower'essentiary creating an open area and etiminating lti 'giiil;t'i"reening trom n"it" ie gnd.sgme of Forest Road' Theproposed plantings will only screen the ground Sqriprirnt *r'rich is noiliousuo inside a structure' but is ground mountedin a fenced in area (screening of the pad rouiLi trunsformer "na t+i."*ent of dead buffer tree should also beprovided). The tower oo". n"i""rpi,, nuit, il "'r'riiiint i"q***"ntr irti u;"urt" ii is less than 200'' The bylaw says 10'above the tree line, but in no case exceeding zo0i(in case there are uuw trriir*"t in the area), so a waiverwould berequired.Agsthetics: lt is impossible to camouflage or screen a 110' tall cell tower which is further exacerbated by the removal ofthe tarer stand of trees arong Route 28. nnotner option wourd o" to ""'ioriiug" ih* iower in plain sight to make it a focalpoint rather than visuar "ruttl' However, tn" "ppii[mi;, ,tt"rqt to, aaurlis iire aesthetic concerns of this highly visiblesite by designing *," to,i"iii'"iruirie i'".ro.["ti*J'is nigrrry'rnaoequaie. The design as presented reads rlke a largesign from a freeway ,nil.tr, flre ap-piopriate reveibi oeiairJ jio o"s,gn "iements. rt iJarso referred to as a church toweronthesiteptansandr;;d;kr;;;fio*n. wid;i;io"iigpi;p.rtvo6"is;J,thelarser''clocktower"mavenduphavingmore negative visuar impacts, with three rurg: i.5;Jiur"i"i r,lpp6rt p"iEr urio ilrreita'wide x 42.5',rong "clock" faces'rather than an obvious monopore ceil tower. g"th dJrG;i ;pti;ilL* o"ttir.nt"r t"1he goats the Town has been workingon for decades for enhance Route 28'Leqar control: The Appricant needs .to .f avg some form of regar contror over ths fail zones that arso prohibits removal ofthe trees reried upon for screening rn ilre_ appiication mat"riit.. prorii" -rn ""r"r"nt for the stormwater swales andintittration basin, currently shown outside of any easement area'Application Analvgiq: The applicant has previously discounted the use. of a concealed Antenna Monopole (cAM)' use ofother existing towers, "nJ r,iii,J ort othei atternTtil."i;;;;;;.' ani r"rr u. pt"iJeJ oocumentation on coverage gap andneed for the location and height. As this uppri"liion ir Nghrv-t".hni"at ii nlture, ihe Planning Division recommends thatthe Zoning Board of Appears engage. a peer i*L* ot tr',"'special p"rriiuppri."tion materlats using the provisions ofCf'r,SSG ".0 provide inf ut to the Board as part of the Hearing process'conservation: Not present. A portion of the site is in the floodplain, coordinate with the conservation Agent'Dgsisn-Review: Refer to the attached June 14,z}zzDesign Review Committee (DRC) Comment Sheet'Engineering:. Provide drainage calculations to support the drainage design plan, Provide operation and maintenance plan'\it.\fr.--*/\
^,,Dffi'3,:*iiTil1ii,;[,liXl1i,',1.;,^3',iilTlillL'.'*",1'fl'1, il;[liiTiliJJ5eor.deterrentrorWglgf No comments - LJRRead & Recelved bY APPlicant{s)
13
ALTERNATIVESITE ANALYSIS1044 Route 28South Yarmouthn MA
STANDARDTechnical Bulletin 97-001 - Guidelines for DRI Review of Wireless CommunicationTowersXl.B.2. Demonstration that all existing structures have been identified and fairly rejected.a) Provide results from tower databases, town records, Cape Cod Commission maps'and other reasonably available resources to identify potential sites on existing structures'b) Provide aerial photographs of sufficient resolution and coverage to identifysignificant features rr.fiud utility rights of way, towers, steeples, tanks, and otherexisting tall structures.,l Foiul and b), consider area greater than the typical "$earch ring." Extend searchfor existing struciures to the acceptable coverage contours of adjacent sites'd) Provide propagation plots to demonstrate anticipated coverage from rejectedsites or structures.e) ldentify whether a combination of the existing structures considered in a, and b'could address the coverage and/or capacity problem defined in item 1)'0 provide documentation tfrat demonstrates that sites with potentially good coverageare not available or othenryise unusable.BACKGROUNDThe radiofrequency ("RF") spectrum is an allotment of frequencies used for thetransmission of radio waves over long distances.l These radio Waves carry data to andfrom devic"* u."d in television, AM and FM radio, XM/Sirius satellite radio, DirecTV,LoJack, radar, garage door openers, baby monitors,. walkie talkies, cordless phoneg'and remote controlsl This spectrum is also utilized by wireless carriers like T-Mobileand AT&T to provide a wide variety of services such as phone, -internet, email, videoand music clips, mobile television, text messaging, games, and software applications'Like visible light, radio waves require a clear "line of sight" in order to function properly'That is, there must be a clear, unobstructed path between the transmitter and thereceiver. lf thero rr" ,ny obstacles in this path, such as trees or buildings, the radiowaves can be attenuatei. Attenuation is a reduction in signal strength of radio waves.The closer that the obstruction is to the transmitter or receiver, the greater that thesignal will be disruPted.SUMMARYBlue Sky Towers lll, LLC ("Blue Sky") has prepared..this Alternative Site Analysis inorder to describe the'process for evaiuating potential sites for a wireless facility in SouthYarmouth, Massachusetts.1 The RF spectrum is just one part of the electromagnetic spectrum. The electromagneticrrequen"i"i of electromagnetic radiation, which includes visible light, x'rays, microwaves'radiation, and gamma raYs.spectrum contains allinfrared and ultraviolet
The process of identifying a technologically appropriate.location, as well as the needfor this communications facility is "Jroviied 'in the RF Analysis prepared by T-Mobile's RF Engineer and RF Rlport as prepared by G Squared SVst9n1s, LLC forAT&T on Juty a, iozo. As certified in ihose reports, T-Mobile and AT&T haveidentified the need to add a new facility to its existing network of sites in this area ofYarmouth to improve "ou"t.g" and iapacity to a 99p in service that now existsthroughout much of South Yarmouih. to maintain a reliable and robustcommunications sysiem-for the individuals, businesses, public ffe1y workers andothers who use its network, T-Mobile and AT&T deploy a network of cell sites (alsocalled wireless communicaiions facilities) throughout the areas in which they arelicensed to provide service. Due to technologicaiconstraints, there is limited flexibilityas to where a new Juriiiiv can be located aio stitt function properly. The goal of thesearch area is to define the permissibte location for placement of a cell site that willprovide adequate service in the subject cell, and also work properly as part of the overallnetwork.The area of the significant gap in coverage and capacity in this area of south Yarmouthconsists primarily 6t resiOeitial propertiei, recreational areas and ponds' T-Mobile andAi&f p"rrorr*.i an extensive seaich of all existing structures within their search areasin order to find un tpptopriate site for a wireless facility' There were no existingstructures in the area that were suitable for attachment of wireless equipment to closeT-Moile and AT&T's sinificantin coveAerial Photo Showing Search Area
SITE IDENTIFICATION PROCESSUsing the search areas identified by the radiofrequency engineers, T-Mobile andAT&T,s site acquisition specialists aitempted to locate tall buildings, structures orwireress towers wiirrin the search ring foi the co-rocation of its wireless equipment'whenever, possible, T-Mobile and ATIr will co-locate on an existing structure insteadof building a new tower.The only identified existing telecommunications tower within the search is located at1045 Route 28. The telecommunications tower consists of a7o'tall monopole designedfor antennas mounted internally inside of canisters. The available centerline heights forthe installation of the internally mounted antennas is at 4s' and 35' centerline heights'The available heights would not allow T-Mobile and AT&T to address the significant gapin coverage and capacity in their respective networks in this area of south Yarmouth'Furthermore, a monop6te witn internally mounted .antenna rather than externallymounted on an uni"nn" platform invotves reducing the number of antennas on thetower and limits spatialdiversity causint diminution ii performance resulting in a loss of,ign;f - strengtft ihat increases the riumber of dropped calls and disrupted datatransmissions.IDG{uotoiDfilgnd@ [CItiv{icrA-2I 11 I'ltB.4'uG6,M{tqEogktJ:._.Hffiffin.t-€ '=+is#=-"0l3i!;o::;i"+4ffil;mzo'@r'4't h.gwr.eg-J.f4L@ fa{6@.@-J@rAk@llj@-J4-*,1g*---l-ffi.-,ffi#@'#-
T-Mobile and AT&T,s agents were unable to find an existing structure that would closeits significant gap in wireless coverage. lt was therefore necessary to find a "raw land"site and construct a tower in order to close the gap. Blue Sky then attempted to locate; Or"pertV used for commercial or institutional purposes within the search area for theconstruction of a new wireless facility that also possessed the necessary attributes forsiting a new telecommunication tower. Blue sky analyzed numerous properties withinthe Jearch area to find a site that would meet the following criteria:r Sufficient ground space to permit construction of a wireless facility;o Sufficient and unobstructed airspace to allow for the installation and maintenanceof the tower, and effective propagation of wireless signals;r Sufficient setback from lot lines, public ways, and residential structures;. Adequate screening between proposed facility and residential areas;r Topography that does not prevent the effective propagation of wireless signals;o Avoidance of locations that would be in close proximity to residential structures;o Avoidance of locations within or close to historical structures or districts;e Avoidance of locations within wetlands or other environmentally sensitive areas;o Lack of adverse title conditions in land records for the property;. Lack of environmental contamination at the site and in the surrounding area;o Appropriate separation from airports, heliports, instrument approach area' orother aviation structure or area as required by the Federal AviationAdministration;. proper soil conditions to ensure that the tower foundation will be secure;o Ability to bring utilities (power and telephone)onto the property;. Unobstructed vehicle access to the area of the proposed facility; ando Ability to secure a lease with the landowner on commercially reasonable terms'ln considering the location for the wireless communications facility, Blue Sky alsoconsidered c6mpliance with Town of Yarmouth Zoning Bylaws. The. Bylaws imposestandards for vegeiative screening, height and setbac-k distances' When consideringlocations for the proposed wireleis coirmunications facility, Blue Sky endeavored to
find a property that would allow for compliance with the provisions and intent of theTown of Yarmouth Zoning BYlaws.The only commercially or institutionally used lot in the area that was of sufficient area'satisfied lot coverage requirement, and offered a vegetative screening is the property at1044 Route 2g. Alirost all other rots in the area are used for residential purposes thatare too small or are commercially used propertie-s that are too crowded' lackeduegetuiiue screenint and were therefore ruled out as feasible alternatives'This Analysis concludes that the site on the 1044 Route 28 property is the most suitablesite to support the necessary facirity to crose T-Mobire's and AT&T's significant gap incoverage.coNcLUSIONBased on the requirements of the Town of Yarmouth Zoning Bylaws, theexisting conditions and land use and for the above listed reasons as well as theresults of the reuil* unJ analysis, the location at 1044 Route 28 is the only feasiblelocation for the proposed facility'
JOB S: 17-056DESIGNED BY: JMM/TEJREVISIONSREV. f:DDRAWN BY:STZBISSUED FOR REVIEW4/20/22DATE:ISSUED FOR REVIEWPS-3SEE PLANSCALE:DISSUED FOR REVIEWALTERNATIVE ANALYSISSITE NAME: SOUTH YARMOUTHSITE NUMBER: MA-51041044 ROUTE 28SOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC352 PARK STREETSUITE 106NORTH READING, MA 01864APPLICANT:ProTerraDESIGN GFOUP, LLC(41 3)320- 4e1 84 Boy RoodBuildlng A,Hodl€y, MASulte 20001 055
JOB f: 1 7-056DESIGNED BY: JMM/TEJREVISIONSDREV, f:STZDRAWN BY:BISSUED FOR REVIEW4/20/22DATE:ISSUED FOR REVIEWPS.2SEE PLANSCALE:DISSUED FOR REVIEWALTERNATIVE ANALYSISSITE NAME: SOUTH YARMOUTHSITE NUMBER: MA-51041044 ROUTE 28SOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC352 PARK STREETSUITE 106NORTH READING, MA 01864APPLICANT:ProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC4 Bov RoodBulldlirs A, Suite 200Hodloy, MA 01055(413)320-4e1 8
MASSDEPWETLANDJOB S: 17-056DESIGNED BY: JMM/TEJREVISIONSREV. f:DSTZDRAWN BY:BISSUED FOR REVIEW4/20/22DATE:ISSUED FOR REVIEWPS.1SEE PLANSCALE:ISSUED FOR REVIEWDALTERNATIVE ANALYSISSITE NAME: SOUTH YARMOUTHSITE NUMBER: MA-51041044 ROUTE 28SOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC352 PARK STREETSUITE 106NORTH READING, MA 01864APPLICANTProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC(413)320- 4918Sulte 20001 0354 Boy RoodBuildlng A,Hodley, MA
JOB f: 17-056NO RESPONSE/NOTINTERESTED BY OWNERTO MAILERASA MAILER KEYBST SIIE/CHURCI]PARCEL IDREJECTED PROPERTYRESIDENTIAL AREACOMMERCIAL AREADESIGNED BY: JMM/TEJREVISIONSDREV. ff:DRAWN BY:STZBISSUED FOR REVIEW4/20/22DATT:ISSUED FOR REVIEWSPSEE PLANSCALEISSUED FOR REVIEWDALTERNATIVE ANALYSISSITE NAME: SOUTH YARMOUTHSITE NUMBER: MA.51041044 ROUTE 28SOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664APPLIGANT: BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC352 PARK STREETSUITE 106NORTH READING, MA 01864ProTerraDESIGN GROUP, LLC(413)320-4918Suite 20001 0354 Boy RoodBulldlng A,Hodley, MA
14
Environmental SoundAssessmentWireless Communications FacilitySite MA-51041044 MA Route 28S o uth Yarmo uth, Mass ach usetts 02 664February 22,2021Prepared For:Blue Sky Towers III' LLC352 ParkStreet, Suite 106N. Reading, MA 01864Prepared By:Modeling Specialties30 Maple RoadWestford, MA 01886Blue Slry T aw ers III, LLC.ilModelingSpecialties
Blue Sky Towers III, LLC, T-Mobile and AT&T propose to build and operate a WirelessTelecommunications Facility in South Yarmouth, Massachusetts to support personalwireless communication in the area. The proposed installation will include antennasmounted on a new 120-foot monopole. Supporting electronic equipment will be in afenced compound at the foot of the pole. T-Mobile and AT&T are already planning tobe anchor tenants for the facility, which will also be made available for co- locators'This report addresses the existing sound levels in the area, sources of sound expectedat this installation and an evaluation ofits potential to affect the neighboring land uses'While only two wireless tenants are currently committed to the proposed facility, itis designed to support up to four commercial wireless carriers and their equipment'The equipment configuration and siting were designed specifically to minimizeenvironmental effects.Overview of Project and Site VicinityThe project is located on the site of a Catholic Church in South Yarmouth, MA' Theexisting building is relatively small and surrounded by a large parking area. The terainis reasonably flat so most receivers have direct line-of-sight to the potential sounds fromthe facility equipment compouncl. There is an existing deciduolts forest on the southwestcorner of the lot, which was defoliate at the time of the field stlrvev. For these reasons.the site will be conservatively modeled without any shielding benefit ofterrain or forest'Daytime and nighttime field measurements were made to survey existing conditions'The equipment sound was estimated using vendor data and lneasurements made atsimilar installations. The corresponding levels expected at the nearby sensitive locationswere estimated using noise modeling techniques prescribed in acoustical literature'Blue Sky Towers II plans provided the necessary information to support the evaluationof project sounds. This study is based on the plans issued by the ProTerra Design Groupdated February 19,2021. This conservative study is based on the highest sound levelsthat the equipment is expected to make even though it makes that sound only a smallfraction of the time. Figure I has a backdrop of a Google aerial image and is annotatedto show the proposed site, surrounding area and nearby receptor locations with theirorientations and distances to the nearest proposed equipment'Blue Sky Towers III, LLC / S. YarmouthSound Assessment
OlrtaswmmLmdmQ uoaetingRcptorSCALE IN FEETFigure l: Project Area Showing the Proposed Equipment Compound and Nearest Receptors2SoundAssessmentBlue SIcy Towers III, LLC / S. Yarmoulh
Discussion of General Noise Analysis MethodsThere are a number of ways in which sound (noise) levels are measured and quantified'All of them use the logarithmic decibel (dB) scale. Following is a brief introduction tothenoisemeasurementterminologyusedinthisassessment.Noise MetricsThe Sound Level Meter used to measure noise is a standardized instrument'l It contains"weighting networks" to adjust the frequency response of the instrument to approximatethat of the human ear under various circumstances. One of these is the A-weightingnetwork. A-weighted sound levels emphasize the middle frequency sounds and de-emphasize lower and higher frequency sounds; they are reported in decibels designatedas ,,dBA." All broadband levels represented in this study are weighted using the A-weighting scale. Figure 2 illustrates typical sound levels produced by sources that arefarniliar to most peoPle'The sounds in our environment usually vary with time, so they cannot always bedescribed with a single number. Two methods are usecl fol describing variable sounds'These are exceedance levels and equivalenl level. Both are derived from a large numberof moment-to-moment A-weighted sound level measurements' Exceedance levels aredesignated Ln, where "n" san have any value from 0 to 100 pet'cent' For example:i Lqo is the sound level in dBA exceeded 90 percent of the time during themeasurement period. The Lso is close to the lowest sound level observed. It isessentially the same as the residual sound level, which is the sound level observedwhen there are no loud, ttansient noises.0 Lso is the median sound level: the sound level in dBA exceeded 50 percent of thetime during the measurement period,I Lro is the sound level in dBA exceeded only l0 percent of the time' It is close to themaximum level observed during the measurement period. The Lro is sometimescalled the intrusive sound level because it is caused by occasional louder noises likethose from passing motor vehicles.By using exceedance levels, it is possible to separate prevailing, steady sounds (Lso)from occasional, louder sounds (Lro) in the environment'American National Standard Specification.for Sound Level Meters, ANSI S l'4- 1983, published by the StandardsSecretariat of the Acoustical Society of America, NY'3Blue Sky T'owers III, LLC / S. YarmouthSound Assessment
Gommon lndoor SoundsRock BnndFood BlcndcrCarbage DisposalVacuum ClenngrTVlRadio ListcningNormal ConvcrsstionCommon Outdoor SoundsChain Sawlnside NY [iubwaY'I'ralnTntck at 100 ft'Cas Lawn Mower at 1t)0 ftAuto at 50 ft' (40 mph)Ilcavlly Travcllcd llighway at 1000 ft.dBADlshwrsher ln Nexl RnortrModcrltc Ralnfsfi on FollagcBlrd Cnlls at 100 ft.Surall Brook ai 25 ft.Refriget'ator'LibraryBedroom at NightRural Comrnunity (no nearby sounds)Thrcshold of Hoarlng (laborntory)Figure 2: Typical Sound Levels frorn Everyday Experience11010090807A60504030201004Blue Sky I'owers III, LLC / S. YarmoulhSound Assessment
The equivalent level isthe level ofa hypothetical steady sound that has the same energyas the actual fluctuating sound observed. The equivalent level is designated L"o, and isalso A-weighted. The equivalent level is strongly influenced by occasional loud,intrusive noises. When a steady sound is observed, all of the Ln and Leq are equal'In the design of noise control treatments, it is essential to know something about thefrequency spectfum of the sound of interest. Noise control treatments do not functionlike the human ear, so simple A-weighted levels are not useful for noise-control designor the identification of tones. The spectra of sounds are usually stated in tetms of octaveband sound pressure levels in dB, with the octave frequency bands being thoseestablished by standard.2 The sounds at the proposed site were evalttated with respectto the octave band sound pressure levels, as well as the A-weighted equivalent soundlevel. onty the A-weighted values are presented here since they represent the moreeasily recognized sound scale that is relevant to the Town and regional standards.Noise Regulations and CrileriaSound compliance is judged on two bases: the extent to which governmental regulationsor guidelines are met, and the extent to which it is estimated that the community isprotected from the excessive sound levels. The governmental regulations that may beapplicable to sound produced by activities at the project site are summarized below'Federulo occupational noise exposure standards: 29 CFR 1910.95. This regulation restrictsthenoiseexposureofemployeesattheworkplaceasreferredtoinOSHArequirements. Workers will not routinely attend this facility. Furthermore, thefacility will emit only occasional sounds of modest levels, as demonstrated by thisstudy.State. In Massachusetts, noise is regulated as an air pollutant. 310 CMR $7.10 uqualitatively prohibits "unnecessary emissions from [a] source of sound that maycause noise". This is interpreted quantitatively by MDEP's FoIm BWP AQ SFP3and their DAQC Policy 90-001. The MDEP's Noise Policy states that a newnoise intrusion may not increase the broadbancl sound level by more than l0 dBAover the pre-existing Lso ambient level. Tonal sotlnds, defined as any octave bandlevel that exceeds the levels in adjacent octave bands by 3 dB or more, are alsoprohibited. The MDEP usually defers to applicable quantitative local ordinanceswhen available.American National Standar.d SpeciJicationlbr Octave, Haff:6r1oru and 7'hird-octave lland l"ilter Sels, ANSIs1.l 1-1966(Rl97s).Illue Sky Towets III, LLC / S. YarmouthSound Assessment
LocalThe Town of Yarrnouth zoningordinance (chapter 104' Noise) providesqualitative lirnits on sounds produced between I 1:00 pm and 7:00 am'Regional wireless ordinances also provide quantitative sound requirements of theequipment at this facility shown in the excerpt below:4Og.7.t3.16round-mounted equipment for Personal wireless service Facilities shall not,during normal operation, generate noise in excess of 5o db (non'continuous) at theproperty line.This analysis presents sound levels at the propefty line as specified by the ordinance'but also includes receptors representing other sensitive community locations'Existing CommunitY Sound LevelsA site survey and noise measurement study were conducted on December 18' 2018 tomeasufe the existing sound levels at and around the site. Additional measurements weremade on September 14, 2020 to update the dataset' The measured levels includedoccasional intrusive sound from traffic, commercial activities, birds and small aircraft'The area around the church is paved for access and parking. The parking lots aresurrounded by deciduous forest, which was defoliate at the tirne of the 2018 survey andfoliate in 2020. ln both cases, the nighttime surveys were condttcted during tlre quiethours of the night on the same day as daytime conditions. The routine operation of thegeneratorsisneverexpectedatnight,butthenighttimesoundlevelswereusedasareference for the character ofthe existing sound and the routine facility operation'Measuren enl MethodologYSince sound impacts are greatest when existing sound levels are lowest, this study wasdesigned to measure community sound levels under conditions typical of "quiet periods"for the area. This study uses methodology to support a MDEP type study (increase inambient) and also suppolts tlre property line analysis. The MDEP uses the backgroundmehic (Lm), which statistically excludes all non-steady sources. The Lso metric givesthe lowest l0 percent of the many samples gathered during a20-minute measurementtaken in the project area. Meteorological conditions during the surveys were all withinthe ANSI required conditions to conduct sound measurements' 'lhis includesrepresentative seasonal temperatures, calm or light winds and no precipitation (or waterstanding on roadways). A11 rneteorological conclitions were noted from fieldobservations, but were also compared to the repofis at Barnstable Municipal Airport,MA(KHYA).Itistypicalforairportwindstobehigherthanmeasuredinthecommunity because they are measured at elevated locations in widely open areas'Measurements wer.e made within the open paved area at the approximate setback of theneighboringresidencesandequipmentcompound.Baseclonspotobservationsinthearea, the levels represent both the site and the nearby community locations' Alla6Blue SIE Towets III, LLC / S'YarmouthSound Assessment
measufements were attended and made with a Rion NA-28 sound level meter' Themeter meets the requirements of ANSI Sl ,4 Type 1 - Precision specification for soundlevel meters. The meter was mounted at approximately 5 feet above the ground' Themicrophone was fitted with factory recommended foam windscreen, The meter wasused to sample the environmental sound and to process the sound into various statisticalmetrics for use in this analysis. The meter is equipped with real time octave band filterset, which allowed it to process sound levels into 1/3 octave bands. While frequencyspecific data were collected, the survey results are repofted only in combined A-weighted levels for simplicity and consistency with the criteria, The filters comply withthe requirements of the ANSI S I -1 I for octave band filter sets. The meter was calibratedin the field using a Larsen Davis Cal-200 sound level calibrator before and after themeasursment sessions. The results of the field calibfation indicated that the meter didnot drift during the studY.The results of the surveys allow both quantitative and qualitative analyses of theacoustical environment surrounding the proposed equipment, The characterization ofambient sound levels reflects the variations caused by volume oftraffic on localroadways, occasional aircraft passes and community sounds'Meusurement ResultsThe measured background levels in the project area ranged from 50 dBA during thedaytime to 37 dBA in the quietest hours of the night. The corresponding Leq valuesrange from 59 dBA to 48 dBA. The measurement rcsults are summarized in Table l 'Table 1: MeasuredSound Levels in theA.reaPeriodTimeLeq dBALso dBA2018 Daytime8:55 AM59502018 Nighttime4:30 AM48372020 Daytime7:35 AM58482020 Nighttime4:32 AM5146Sounds from the Proposed InstallationThe project,s cument plans include T-Mobile and AT&T equipment and ptovide someengineering detail for their proposed equipment. The tower is expected to attract othercarriers, but each carrier designs their system basecl on the particular needs oftheirnetwork. For that reason, this study addresses the sound from only the equipmentproposed in the curr.ent plan. Most of the equipment planned for this facility has nopotential of emitting sound. Cabling and piping for utilities will be underground'Only two types of sources al'e planned for this facility as quantified in this study' Theantennas will be supported by cabinet mounted radio electronics and generators at thefoot of the tower.7Blue SIE'lbwers III, U'C / S. YarmouthSound Assessment
a t-
,:"..." .1irI ,lilLt!
Souid
I
t
1
i
i
i
i"
i
I
i,
ashhrdfE:-
llBt t.
I
I
f
shhrd |6-].{ 1,,'t-rl ,'#-'l i
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
1
.-.-- tn-. ,l
L i--1 ,i--
E drtrE
P.v.d P.tti4
t-
II , l.r!!-!9 ?-ell! tlt
Cr.phic 6oh h FEET
cot{FouNDPt-Ail Fq-.F4;*:
Figure 3: Plan Showing the Equipment Compound and the Existing Parking Lot
Btue SIE T'wers III, U'C / S. Yarmouth SourdAsessment
T-Mobib EquipmontAT&T Equipm.ntll, I-.-. \:,tGnphic Sctl. ln F..tELEVATIONFigure 4: Elevation Plan showing the vertical character of the Monopole and compound9Blue Slcy Towers III, LLC / S.YarmoulhSoundAssessment
Routine Sound EmissionsThe only routine sound emissions planned from the proposedT-Mobile equipment is from the electronics cabinet fans' Thesmall fans in the cabinet draws outside air through the unit' Ithas a smooth broadband character that produces about 50 dBAat 3 feet from the unit. The field irnage to the right has an insetshowing that the rear or sides have no louvered openings'Therefore, the T-Mobile cabinets only emit sound in theforward direction. Ttl'ee cabinets are planned, but only onefaces the sensitive west direction. The modeling is based on asingle unit emitting in every direction,In a similar way, the AT&T Walk-ln-Cabinet (WIC) is usuallycooled by ambient air. The WIC cooling fans increase in speedas the need for cooling increases' Their sound at full speedexceeds the modest sotmd from the door mounted cooler' Thecooler engages before the full speed fans are needed, usuallyabout 90o F. The highest sound is expected from the WIC isabout 50 dBA at 23 ft. The fans on the WIC will operatecontinuously, so there will be no variation from moment tomoment or cycling from equipment staftup. Fans are mounted onthe inside of the cabinets (which will always remain closed)' Inthis way, the cabinet configuration is designed for minimal effecton the surrounding area. The sketch to the right shows the cooleron the front of the AT&T WIC' For most sites, the sound fromthe cabinets is a non-issue because they are such modest sources'They are modeled here as the highest expected nighttime soundemission.Non-Routine SoundEmissionsDoor MounLdAlr CoolcrAT&T'g WICS€{l€ FEE'rofraEEE:IThe installation will include two generators installed inside sound reducingenclosures. T-Mobile proposes a propane-fired 36 kw Kohler 36ccl seriesgenerator. The system is rated at only 57 dBA at23 feet during theJquipment tests. This low sound level is far below typical sound fromgenerators of a comparable outpttt.AT&T proposesa propane-fired Polar 15 kW generator. As a DC unit, itprovides supportin a very different way than the more familiar ACgenerators. A DCgenerator will only operate to the level demandedbythe load. It has a caPacitYto produce 15 kW which may be demanded inan emergency. But it willhave no load during routine tests so the unitwill essentially oPerate at a highidle during the test. The full load soundratingis 59 dBA, but the sound level associated with the generator testisis consiclered an upset condition, theabout56 dBA at23 feetfrom the unit, Since the emergency operationtest condition is modeled for this studyBlue Slqt Towers III, LLC / S.YarmouthIOSoundAssessment
Project Sound Level Mitigation FeaturesThe proposed generators will be monitored remotely and tested regularly to assure thesafe and effective operation of the equiprnent during a loss of utility power' Variousdesign features were implemented at this facility to reduce the potential sound' Theequilrnent location is as far as practical from sensitive locations while meeting the hostl..qui.e*"ntr. The primary source of facility sound is the infrequent operation of thegenerators. Again, the generators were placed as far as practical from the sensitivedirections. A supplementary 6-foot sound barrier is planned to furthef shield thereceivers from generator sound. The carriers selected generator models that are highlymitigated for sound. For example, a typical residential generator in the 4,000-watt rangecommon in most communities operates at about 70 dBA al23 feet. Both of the plannedunits are far higher capacity, yet each is expected to operate below 60 dBA at thereference distance. worst-case modeling of the facility assumes simultaneous operationof the two generators (which is unlikely). Together, they are expected to operate at alevel lower than the existing measurcd ambient at the property line. The Cape CodCommission recommendation that LP fuel be used further quiets the operation' Gaseousfuel is quieter, but also lowers the equipment profile by eliminating the belly tank. Thisincreases the benefit ofthe proposed sound shields'Modeling DetailsNoise prediction modeling was performed using CADNA software under downwindweather conditions as assumed in the standard ISO 9613-2. Table 2 summarizes themodeling input parameters'Table 2:Modeling Input ParametersItemFlat TerrainI70o/oWCondition6.5Ground.0=wE-*#2meter abovelevel)kPropagationcalculalions inc orPoratethe adverse ffictsof certain atmosPheric andmeteorologicalconditions on sound ProPagation,such as gentlebreeze of I to 5 m/s(lSO 1996-2: 1987)fromsource to receiver'** category F represents a stable atmosphere that promotes noise propagalion'Sound Level Modeling ResultsSince all the equipment with the potential to emit sound will be at gror"rnd level, thesound will be shieldecl in some directions by other equipment and surrounding forest'The sound barriers are also included in the modeling, but the conservative study didnot take any credit for attenuation by the forest. 'fhe worst-case equipment levels willbe 45 dBA or less at the properly line. This is lower than the daytime ambient level of48 dBA, Sounds that are less than the ambient level may be heard but are not noticedin a typical community. Fo| this reason, the daytime tests are expected to beBlue Stry Towers III, LLC / S. YarmouthilSottnd Assessntent
compatible with existing daytime traffic and community sources and not be noticed atthe residences beyond the property line. Tables 3 and 4 provide a summary of themodeling results, A graphical summary of the results is also provided in Figure 5.Table 3: Summarv of Modeling Results ofLine Sound LevelsReceptorLocationDist(Fr)Ambient LevelDavA{ight(dBA)HVAC Only(dBA)With Generators(dBA)Comply?P/L SW128481373945YesTable 4Summarv of Modeling at the other AreaSensitiveRecentorsConclusionsReceptorLocationDist(Fr)Ambient LevelDav (dBA)CombinedSound (dBA)Increase(dB)Res SWI2084838+lRes SW22804836+0Res SW33364837+0Res West2104840+lBank, East2504844+lThe potential sound of the proposed Wireless Telecommunications Facility wasevaluated using measured field data and numerical modeling methods. Ambient soundlevels were established by field measurements using equipment that is standardized tothe current ANSI standards. Equipment operating sound levels were quantified usingvendor estimates confirmed by representative field measurement at other installations'Much of the time, the proposed facility will produce no significant sound. The cabinetfans will operate continuously at a very low level of sound that will be well below theambient level, so are never expected to be noticed in the community'Infrequently, for one half-horn per week, the proposed facility sounds will include thedaytime testing of the emergency genefators. The combined sound from the T-Mobileand AT&'f generators is expected to be tlre wol'st-case daytime sound level' During asimr,rltaneous test, the facility sound is expected to be 45 dBA or less at the property line'The analysis shows that the facility sources will usually emit no sound that would benoticed outside the equipment compound. The cabinet fans will operate as needed toprotect the cabinet electronics without affecting the community. Under high ambienttemperatures, usually above 85o F, the cabinet heat load may trigger elevated fan poweror the supplementary cooling system on the WIC. Another infrequent event is theroutine test of the facility generatofs. The study is based on the facility's worst-casesouncl, which is a rare combination of both the high fans and generators' The results ofthe study indicate the worst-case facility equipment sound will lernain withincompliance goal of 50 dBA at the ploperty line. It also meets the MDEP standard withonly a minor increase in sound at the receptors. In this way, the study indicates thefacility is expected to meet applicable noise standards under all operational conditions'Blue SIE Towers III, LLC / S. Yarmouthl2Sound Assessmenl
N+OMc*iurcrert LclfoO L,looetitg RiccptorIiCALE N FEEI100Flgure 5: Craphical Summary ofthe Facility sound Modeling with cabinets plus GeneratorsI3SoundAssessmeilBlue SIE Tovers III, LLC i S. Yarmouh
15
Dov,atn L. HAES, JR., CHP, CLSORadi at io n S aJb ty Spe c ial is tPO Box 198, Hampstead, NH 03841 617-680-6262Emai I : donald_haes-chp@comcast.netSeptember 4,2020RE: Installation of radio base station antennas and associated equipment for the proposedBlue Sky Towers III, LLC monopole at1044 Route 280 South Yarmouth, MA.PunposnI have reviewed the information pertinent to the proposed installation at the above location.To determine regulatory compliance, theoretical calculations of maximal radio-frequency (RF)fields have been prepared. The physical conditions are that T-Mobile and AT&T proposes to installpersonal wireless services (PWS) directional panel antennas (several antennas each in three"arrays" aimed along three different azimuths) on a proposed Blue Sky Towers III, LLC monopole.For proposed location, see Figure 2. The monopole is proposed to be 120 feet tall, above groundlevel (AGL). The proposed installation will allow T-Mobile and AT&T to continue deploymentof their wireless telecommunication systems. The monopole is designed to host two additionalpWS provider's antennas (See Figure 3). This report includes not only the T-Mobile and AT&T,but the hypothetical condition of being 'oloaded" to capacity'This report considers the contributions of allthe proposed T-Mobile and AT&T, along withtwo additional hypothetical PWS transmitters operating at their typical FCC licensed capacities.The calculated values of RF fields are presented as a percent of current Maximum PermissibleExposures (%MPE) as adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC),i'ii and thoseestablished by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH).iiiSuvr*ranYTheoretical ftp field calculations data indicate the summation of the proposed T-Mobileand AT&T maximum PWS RF contributions would be within the established RF exposureguidelines; see Figure 4. The additional calculations also suggest that even if the monopole hadtwo additional PWS provider's antennas attached, the site would comply with all established RFexposure guidelines; see Figure 5.This includes all publicly accessible areas, and the surrounding neighborhood in general.The results support compliance with the pertinent sections of the Massachusetts Department ofpublic Health regulations regarding PWS facilities, and the FCC's guidelines for RF exposure.Based on the results of the additional theoretical RF fields I have calculated, it is my expertopinion that this facility would comply with all regulatory guidelines for RF exposure'Note: The analyses, conclusions and professional opinions are based upon the precise parameters and conditions ofthis particular site; Monopoleat 1044 Route 28, South yarmoutn, Ua. Utitization ofthese analyses, conclusions and professional opinions for any personal wireless servicesinstallation, existing or proposed, other than the aforernentioned has not been sanctioned by the author, and therefore should not be accepted asevidence of regulatory compl iance.Page 1 of13
ExposunB Llnntrs Auo GUIoELINESRF exposure guidelines enforced by the FCC were established by the American NationalStandards Institute (ANSI)i" and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement(NCRP)." The RF exposure guidelines are listed for RF workers and members of the public. Theapplicable FCC RF exposure guidelines for the public are listed in Table 1, and depicted in Figurel. All listed values are intended to be averaged over any contiguous 30-minute period. Note thatlimits forooRF workers" are five times those listed in Table 1.Table 1: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Values in Public AreasFrequency BandsElectric FieldsMagnetic FieldsEquivalent Power Density0.3 - 1.34 MHz6la ff/m)1.63 (A/m)(100) mWcm21.34 -30MHz82atf (tm)2.tetf (Nm)(100) mWcm230 - 300 MHz27.s (Ylm)0.073 (A/m)0.2mWlcmz300 - 1500 MHzf 11500 mWcm21500 - 100,0001.0 mWcm2-wnbtuuM€dt4-'^ tt*ff.htiln0-03,000,0,000Frequcrcy (ittrz)Figure 1: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)NOTE: FCC eeso/o Rule" - When the exposure limits are exceeded in an accessible area due tothe emissions from multiple fixed RF sources, actions necessary to bring the area into complianceare the shared responsibility of all licensees whose RF sources produce, at th.e area in question,levels that exceed 5% of the applicable exposure limit proportional to power. u'Page 2 of 13EIraAr@.0r(L0I.00,10.0300!00
Flcrltrv Locnrton ANn Buu,o-OurFigure 2: Proposed Monopole Location1044 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MA(Picture courtesy Google Earth Pro@ and may not represent cutent conditions.)Figure 3: Hypothetical Loading of Monopole1044 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MA(Picture courtesy PRO TERRA, LLC,')4(P) AIAT RFEOTJIPIIGNT(F)(BY(P) T-UOE|LE RFEQUIPIE}ITRF EQUIPTI|ENTolHERg), Tvp.Page 3 of 13
IurRooucroRY IunoRnn,q.TIoN: MAKING SBttlsB oF THE 66G"sThere are many references to the so-called "generation" of wireless technologies in use. Each new,.generation" of wireless technologies has colloquially been designated a numbered'0G".1 The latest "G"to come out, the fifth generation of wireless technologies or so called "5G", has attracted extensiveresearch interest, both inside and outside the scientific community. According to the 3'd generationpartnership project,2 5G networks should support three major families of applications: (l) Enhancedmobile broadband; (z) Machine type communications, and (3) Ultra-reliable and low-latencycommunications. There are also enhanced "vehicle-to-everything" communications which are expectedto be supported by 5G networks. These situations require much more "connectivity" than the latest fourthgeneration (aka"4G- or oolong Term Evolution (LTE)") networks can handle'Thus, new networks must be able to handle this high system throughput, in addition to supportingexisting older technologies still in use. This is being accomplished through additional spectrumassignments both higher and lower than currently assigned frequencies used by PWS facilities' In fact,currently deployed 5G networks are operating at frequencies once used by television stations.Nonetheless, frequencies assigned by the FCC for 5G use are all within the bands cunently underregulatory oversight, including setting safe limits of exposure to RF energy for both workers, and membersof the public. Just recentl y @/2020) the FCC has reaffirmed the efficacy of their regulatory exposurelimits to RF energy, including those for 5G. From an RF safety standpoint, there is nothing peculiar aboutthe fifth generation of wireless technologies that would set it apart from any of the other advancements oftechnologies; including the first two generations (first analog then digital communications), the thirdgeneration (the first to be referred to a numbered-series as '03G"), and the currently deployed fourthgenerations (LTE). Recently published studies in peer-reviewed journalsuii have shown typical exposuresto RF energy from operating 5G systems to be well-within the exposure limits'The FCC cugently has categories for Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS): Category "A"refers to a lower power base station, Category "B" must be deployed outdoors and has higher maximumpower limits compared with Category "A" devices, and Category "C". The maximum allowableEquivalent Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP; the total RF power radiated by the antenna') is 30 dBm(l watt), 47 dBm(50 watts), and 62 dBm (1585 watts) for the listed categories "A", "B", and'0C", per 10MHz of bandwidth, resPectivelY.I pWS .,Generations": lG: Analog voice; 2G: Digital voice; 3G: Mobile data; 4G: LTE and mobile Intemet; 5G: Mobilenetworks interconnect people, con-trol machines, objects, and devices with multi-Gbps peak rates and ultra-low latency.2 SOURCE: (httns://www.3gpp.ors/about-3gpp) The 3'd Generation Partnership Project (3CPP) unites [Seven]telecommunicution, stunftil-l&Eolr*nt oiganizations (ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TSDSI, TTA, TTC), known as.,organizational partners,' and provides their rnembers with a stable environment to produce the Reports and Specificationsthat define 3GPP technologies.Page 4 of 13
Tnsonprtcnl RF FInlo C.q.LcuLnrIoNS - GnouNn LevnlsMBrHonoLocYThese calculations are based on what are called "worst-case" estimates. That is, the estimatesassume 100% use of all transmitters simultaneously. Additionally, the calculations make the assumptionthat the surrounding area is a flat plane, and there is no degradation ofsignal strength due to the presenceof foliage, building materials, atmospheric conditions, etc. The resultant values are thus conservative inthat they over predict actual resultant power densities.The calculations are based on the following information (See Table 2 datafor T-Mobile and AT&Tcalculations, and Table 3 for hypothetical data representing a "fully loaded" monopole):1. Effective Radiated Power (ERP).2. Antenna height (centerline, above ground level (AGL)).3. Antenna vertical energy patterns (See Appendix A); the source of the negative gain (G) values'"Directional" antennas are designed to focus the RF signal, resulting in "patterns" of signal lossand gain. Antenna energy pattems display the loss of signal strength relative to the direction ofpropagation due to elevation angle changes. The gain is expressed as "GE".Note: "G" is a unitless factor usually expressed in decibels (dB); where G = l0 (dB/10)For example: for an antenna gain of 3 dB' the net factor (G) : 70 Qlto) :2For an anienna /oss of -3 dB, the net factor (G) = 10 (-3lr0): 0'5To determine the magnitude of the RF field, the power density (S) from an isotropic RF source iscalculated, making use of the power density formula as outlined in FCC's OET Bulletin 65, Edition97-01:uiiiS_ P.GWhere:P -> Power to antenna (watts)G + Gain of antennaR -+ Distance (range) from antenna source to point ofintersection with the ground (feet)R2 : 6teight)2 + (Horizontal distance)24'n'NSince: P . G : EIpp (Effective Isotropic Radiated Power) for broadcast antennas, the equation canbe presented in the following form:S-4 'n 'RPIn the situation of off-axis power density calculations, apply the negative elevation gain (G E) valuefrom the vertical energy patterns with the following formula:S: EIRP'6n4'n'R?Page 5 of13
Ground reflections may add in-phase with the direct wave, and essentially double the electric fieldintensity. Because power density is proportional to the square of the electric field, the power density mayquadruple, that is, increase by a factor of four (4). Since ERP is routinely used, it is necessary to convertERp inro EIRp by multiplying by the factor of 1.64 (the gain of a half-wave dipole relative to an isotropicradiator). Therefore, downrange power density estimates can be calculated by using the formula:S:4'(ERP'1-64). GE = ERP'1G E : 0.522.ERP. 6E4 'n'R37[ .R2RPTo calculatetheYo MPE, use the formula:%MPE= _$-' looMPEThe results of the calculations for the potential maximum RF emissions resulting from thesummation of the proposedT-Mobile and AT&T PWS system (See Table 2 inventory) are depicted inFigure 4 as plotted against linear distance from the base of the monopole in any direction. The results ofthe calculations for the potential maximum RF emissions resulting from the summation of the proposedT-Mobile and AT&T pWS plus twofuture hypotheticat additional PWS carrier's transmitter and antennainstallation (See Table 3 inventory) are similarly depicted in Figure 5. Note that the values have beencalculated for a height of 6' AGL in accordance with regulatory rationale, and assumes all antennas aredirected along the same azimuths.Also depicted on the graphs are values for a height of l6' AGL (height of a typical 2nd story). Alogarithmic scale was used to plot the calculated theoretical %MPE values in order to compare with theMpE limit values of 100% (public) and 500% (note that 100% Worker limit : 500% Public limit), whichare so much larger that they would be off the page in a linear plot. The curves are variable due to theapplication of the vertical energy patterns (See Appendix A)'OsssRvnrloNs IN CoNSIDERATIoN wIrH FCC Rulrs $1.1307(n) & S1.1310Wilt it be physically possible to stand next to or touch any omnidirectional antenna and/or stand infrontof a directional antenna?No; access to the monopole will be restricted, and the site will adhere to RF safety guidelines regardingthe transmitting antennas, including appropriate signage.Page 6 of13
ANrrnNixn INvnxroRYTable 2: Proposed and Possible Antenna & Transmitter Inventory120' Monopole at 1044 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MATypical UseTypical Parameters:ERP & Transmit FrequenciesTypical AntennaConfigurationAGL)AntennaCenterlineProposed by T-MobilePCS/LTE-1900AWS-1700AWS-2100LTE-7OOBack-Haul3156 watts ERP;= 1900 MHz4357 walts ERP;= 1700 MHz3708 watts ERP;= 2170MHz2507 watts ERP; = 1950 MHz3974 watts ERP27-31GHzEMS RR 6519Kathrein 742351Kathrein 742351Powerwave77622' MW "Dish"1 15'Proposed by AT&TLTE.TOOUMTS-850AWS-2100PCS/LTE-1900wcs-23001968 watts ERP;= 777 MHz2260 watts ERP; = 850 MHz2566watts ERP; = 2170MHz2625 watts ERP; : 1950 MHz5613 watts ERP2350 MHz100'80010122OPA-65R-LCUUTable Notes:AWS: Advanced Wireless ServicesLTE: Long Term Evolution (a.k'a. "4G")PCS: Personal Communication SystemUMTS: Universal Mobile Telecommunications ServicesWCS: Wireless Communication ServiceTable 3: Hypothetical Antenna & Transmitter Inventory120' Monopole at 1044 Route 280 South Yarmouth, MATypical UseTypical Parameters:ERP & Transmit FrequenciesTypical AntennaConfigurationAntennaCenterline(AGL)PWS Carriers"700" (LTE)850 "Cellular"AWSPCS-LTE3035 watts ERP; = 750MHz3035 watts ERP;= 850 MHz5049 watts ERP;= 2l00MHz4357 watts ERP;= 1900 MHzSBNHH-ID65BLNX-6514DS-A1M85',850 "Cellular"PCS-LTE1200 watts ERP;= 850 MHz2720 watts ERP; = 19oo MHzDB93ODD65LNX-65I4-DS-VTM70'Page 7 of13
- -.16r aGL-6r AGL-n/8 f, (Publlc)-Itr'E (Work8.)1000.00%100,|X)7o%MPE10.00t/ol.fr|Vo0.t0%5{n00ltxl02{n03rxt0,llxloDistrEc€For Brs. Feetl3-O2'/o4.01t/oRBSUITS OF THEORETTCAL RF FTNIN CNLCUL.q.TIONSFigure 4: Theoretical Cumulative Maximum Percent MPE - vs. - Distance(Combined T-Mobile + AT&T RF Contributions)Figure 5: Theoretical Cumulative Maximum Percent MPE - vs. - Distance(combined RF contributions Representing a'6Fully Loaded" Monopole)- -.tdr AGL-6rAGL-}tr'E {Ithtrc}-l'g'E(srslr)lmo.00%100.00%% DIPE10,ffiolo1.00%0.10%4firo5{X}00100020003000Dist*rcc fitD Base [fee3lPage 8 of13
CoNct,ustoNTheoretical RF field calculations data indicate the summation of the proposed T-Mobile andAT&T maximum pWS RF contributions would be within the established RF exposure guidelines; seeFigure 4. The additional calculations also suggest that even if the monopole had two additional PWSprovider,s antennas attached, the site would comply with all established RF exposure guidelines; seeFigure 5.This includes all publicly accessible areas, and the surrounding neighborhood in general. Theresults support compliance with the pertinent sections of the Massachusetts Department of Public Healthregulations regarding PWS facilities, and the FCC's guidelines for RF exposure'The number and duration of calls passing through PWS facilities cannot be accurately predicted.Thus, in order to estimate the highest RF fields possible from operation of these installations, the maximalamount of usage was considered. Even in this so-called "worst-case", the resultant increase in RF fieldlevels are far below established levels considered safe.Based on the results of the additional theoretical RF fields I have calculated, it is my expert opinionthat this facility would comply with all regulatory guidelines for RF exposure'Feel free to contact me if you have any questionsSincerely,Donald L. Haes, Jr.{: e r t ifr e d Hea I t h PhYs ic isrNote: The analyses, conclusions and prolessional opinions are based upon the precise parameters and conditions ofthis particular site; Monopole at 1044Route 2g, south yarmouth, MA. utilization oftheie analyses, .on.lurion. andprofessional opinions for any personal wireless services installation, existingor proposed, other than the alorementioned has not been sanctioned by the author, and therelore should not be accepted as evidence of regulatory compliancePage 9 of 13
DoNalo L. HAES, JR., CHP, CLSORadiat io n S aJbtY SP ec ial i s tPO Box 198, Hampstead, NH 03841 617-680-6262Emai I : donald_haes-chp@comcast,net12J4.Sr,trnNlBNT oF CnnnnIcATIoNI certiff to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements of fact contained in this report aretrue and conect.The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions andlimiting conditions, and are personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions and conclusions.I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject ofthis report and I haveno personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved.My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined energy level or directionin-energy level that favors thi cause of the client, the amount of energy level estimate, theattainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event.This assignment was not based on a requested minimum environmental energy level or specificpower density.My compensation is not contingent on an action or event resulting from the analyses, opinions, orconclusions in, or the use of, this report.The consultant has accepted this assessment assignment having the knowledge and experiencenecessary to complete the assignment competently.My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared, in.onror1nity with the American Board of Heatth Physics (ABHP) statements of standards ofprofessional responsibility for Certified Health Physicists.Date: September 4. 2020Donald L. Haes. Jr.Certified Health PhYsicist5678Page 10 of13
80&-960 MHzHorlzonlal patternt46o-poladzsilonVerllcal paltemtrtEo-polarlzellon0.9"-12.5o eleclrlcaldowntllt1710-2180 MHzl-lorlzonlal pett€m*45o-pdarlzatlonVerffcal pattsma4grpoladzatlon0.5"-l 0o €bcfbd dovmtlltAPPENDIX AVertical & Horizontal Energy PatternsAr*€ixra Pa[€rnVei*ferIIf*.&aa+F-:4-4F'-;1:3bi:: $ a;T:+-.:.S!+F,14| C-V,-5:{ ? A+xflds* -sbcAzirnuthElerl/?tion3 a.9dr ry coruzttr (.rFedr n ri( :Page 11 of13
PO Box 198, Hampstead, NH 03841DoNatn L. HAES, fR., CHP, CLSORadiation SoJbty Specialist617-680-6262 Email:donald haes chp@comcast.netaSUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONSAcademic Training -o Graduated from Chelmsford High School, Chelmsford, MA;June 1973.o Completed Naval Nuclear Naval Nuclear Power School, 6-12/1976.o Completed Naval Nuclear Reactor Plant Mechanical Operator and Engineering LaboratoryTechnician (ELT) schools and qualifications, Prototype Training Unit, Knolls Atomic PowerLaboratory, Windsor, Connecticut, l-9 I 1977 .o Graduated Magna Cum Laude from University of Lowell with a Bachelor of Science Degree inRadiological Health Physics; 5 / 1987 .o Graduated from University of Lowell with a Master of Science Degree in Radiological Sciencesand Protection; 5/1988.Certification -o Board Certified by the American Board of Health Physics 1994; renewed 1998, 2002,2006,2010,2014, and201 8. Expiration 12/31 12022.o Board Certified by the Board of Laser Safety 2008; renewed 2011,2014,2017. Expiration1213112020.aaaEmployment History -o Consulting Health Physicist; IonizingAtronionizing Radiation, 1988 - present.o Radiation, RF and Laser Safety Officer; BAE Systems'2005-2018 (retired).o Assistant Radiation Safety Officer; MIT, 1988 - 2005 (retired).o Radiopharmaceutical Production Supervisor - DuPontA{EN, 1981 - 1988 (retired).o United States Navy;Nuclear Power Qualifications, 1975 - l98l (Honorably Discharged).Professional Societies -o Health Physics Society [HPS].o American Academy of Health Physics IAAHP]o Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers [IEEE];o International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety [CES] (ANSI C95 series).o Laser Institute of America [LIA].o Board of Laser Safety [BLS].o American National Standards Institute Accredited Standards Committee IASC 2136]o Committee on Man and Radiation [COMAR].Page 12 of13
EnnNorpsi. Federal Register, Federal Communications Commission Rules; Radiofrequency radiation;environmental fficts evaluation guidelines Volume 1, No. 153, 41006-41199, August 7,1996' (47 CFRPart 1; Federal Communications Commission).ii. Telecommunications Act of 1996,47 USC; Second Session of the l04sCongress of the United Statesof America, January 3,1996.iri. 165 CMR 122.000: Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Non-Ionizing Radiation Limits for:The General pubtic from Non-Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, Employees fromOccupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, and Exposurefrom Microwave Ovens'iu. IEEE C95.1-1999: American National Standard, Sof"ty levels with respect to human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, from 3 kHz to 300 GHz (Updated in 2020).u. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP); Biological Effects and ExposureCriteria for Radiofre quency Electromagnetic F iel ds, NCRP Report 86' I 986'ui. Federal Register, FederalCommunications Commission Rules; Vol. 85, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 1,2020 lRules and Regulations 18145.uii. Jamshed, Muhammad Ali (Institute of Communication Systems (ICS), Home of 5G Innovation entre(5GIC), University of Surrey, Guildford GUZ 7XH, U.K). Electro-magnetic field exposurereduction/avoidance for the next generations of wireless communication systems. IEEE Journal ofElectromagnetics, RF, And Microwaves in Medicine and Biology, Vol' 4' No' l,March2020'viii. gB1 Bulletin 65: Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology,Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency ElectromagneticFields; Edition 97-01, August 1999.Page 13 of13
16
PreTerraDESIGN GBOUP, LLCSean Gormley, Program ManagerBlue Sky Towers lll, LLCFrom: ProTerra Design GrouP, LLCDate: JanuarY 10,2022Re: lncorporated stormwater standards for Proposed cellTowerMashPee Fire $tation #2 (MA'51121101 Red Brook RoadMashpee, MA 02649per discussions between Blue Sky Towers lll, LLc and ProTerra Design Group, LLC (ProTerra),this memo was prepared to outline stormwater standards incorporated into the new towerlocation site design.The original site desig n in 2017 incorporated a stormwater treatment system requiring theclearing of additional trees for the treatment area. During the review process, the cape codcommission and Town of Mashpee staff requested that ProTerra remove the stormwaterfacilities due to the sandy nature of the surrounding soils and to eliminate clearing treesunnecessarily. At that time, Town of Mashpee staff also requested that the site designincorporate a few smaller stormwater features to disperse runoff prior to treatment through theexisting vegetated and wooded areas. All parties agreed to wrap the site with a 12" wide peagravel diaphragm.Based on similar soil conditions at the new tower site and the previous Town of Mashpee staffdiscussions, ProTerra followed a comparable design principle for dispersing stormwater at thenew tower and driveway locations. Pea gravel diaphragms are included on the downhill sides ofthe compound and driveway. A small stone level spreader is proposed at the low point near thedriveway entrance along Red Brook Road. These drainage features will direct stormwaterrunoff generated from the tower compound and driveway into the adjoining natural vegetatedfilter strips for treatment.lf you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to call us at (413)320-4918.PraTerrq Design GrouP, LLC4 Bay Road, Building A, Suite 204Hadley, MA 01035Ph:(413)320'491"8E : i nfo @ P rote r ra -de si g n. co m
17
tur sn n tE ilt' MSKY w f# slrltirir, utc#Fr' f" r, n., ^, nBLUEHII!(t,rHHFhIrlrliIHHHh8Hsrt8 ttrfi sulr wnnFsnf }l/,I0'tu rA-6tUfiDnJFg! l01l 'iJ{/'t usMflt tAnm',t, rt 0881DAIIiil6nDM!BLlilil.lI l:rI IE tECt IIIIEto!16ill.:.ltrillal!rlF;l!talitl1€t)88fIo't6ITIFlzlml6t2FiidaigiilliiiiiiiiEiliiliillilltIfL6t(,16)llr'.-1triilfri!l;'flotnrlHel*!to;ltrlrllfitIt!t",\t,/t2.J-ffiIJT5.ffiIIIIlitIsliSd--,.III,l*I,*IIInxIIcFII--.,1r.Itut2.5*iwItIit_tt-.IIt--rr'r,5r!52Tts-
outB 8ffi wffi llt, MGW ltr PfrSt&rii rrcifl'#r'Srn*, ,, "",MBLUEw1--H@rIN;E-FHEHFFBHsn8 MtIDm I,-5101ADD,,,f/S: loU ,'ltlr ISdmt nnMnn u0s84T'dd-0)tiILl*tllr^I trrlgtltgBta.t'jjgtiEtttltI'r\Z{iq.,{!rfrJt:f',91')-'tiI8;IiIaIBo-AIH:IIJi l{:;l*3!lBt2st;Ia8kIIIrIIIr?.sffI51!.52{sdsr F6rax^w)!!r€iisiffi'_.tIL6ffi-tr3i-IjcIIttBPIt--IIt-LIt-'P[l"1I.l-.I'i-.]m-
we Dwcsnmtw ilt, urr$bHi?'i1""##fr,#X,,-'B@RRFb9IlrlxHHre snr ttttr NWBnnrenilsEa Nlts'k u-6t01n0n$s toat nNEx us0,.nnuwrln y/0r81Ei.FFT'ddt2?6Il"l$f .lFrstEilo.ft3--ITtqlE:e lfi!s lEt2II:iIiI8IIfELlD--ir---- tl96f'+i ,fhl gllJ*frrFll=rLll5*l!!-I-l=IIIIi#;hII_tIF,'r2.rff12.!--ff
BLUEBUr 9N '0T8,6 'I', Mcw 16r f/xlstMfTir, ir-c'^$ffi 'S,r".,,,*,@IFHIHEHtsBE$p0|-iotFHHfrE.-TnE uttrr sdnfl ilNwttl,SNE MDOEfu TI-6'01aDDn,f,S: 1011 /'g.fit As,x'lir ytufinn' lA 0as1HEpIhFzatI5Tao'0ttEIl"l#llr.Itt fletiltEat,:.:it::J,4\\l;','a!lfAIl; ,.f:l, IdE:.._lE"nflt1 ,rl( l')p\a/.'{:; ,t88A.alFt6;.;l*tc.lE?g tD33lBt:8",L:I8IIIII--1 -i---#rcus:lIffiITt,,IE3Fl-l0rgIIt$9i=F-Isslt7.'rtrr!0Tt$---m*IItIegjI1-.i
18
$ttManagemeqfThis letter of authorization dated j-^Ouu of h0r,*h* 2020, provides wrirren aurhorization forBlue Sky Towers lll, LLc, its attorneys, other agents or representatives, to apply for any necessary zoilingpetitions, permits or any other approvals, including but not limited to the filing of a building permitapplicatlon (after required zoning approval has been completed if necessary) which are necessary forthe placement of a wireress communicatrons facirity with a portion of Map 50 Lot r.gg,r., commonryknown as (street address) 1044 Route 28, commonwealth of Massachusetts, county of garnstahle.Town of yarmouth,This Letter of Authorization shall not constitute an agreement to enter into a binding agreem€nt andneither party shall be bound with regard to the leasing or purchase of the above mentio.ed propertyuntil a finar agreement has become furry executed between the parties,Letter of AuthorizationCurrent qwner of propertylBy,Prlnt Name:Tirle:Date:Patk.Place West , 3S2 park Str:eet, Suite 11.06 . Nodh.Reading, MA 0l g${0r BBf_960_Z9Sg . S: 966_ZA7-s4Jt