HomeMy WebLinkAboutTab 11 5005 1044 Route 28 Design Review CommentsRovlew le:n Concoptuel E FormalcI Btndtng (404 MoteleMCoD/R.O.A.D. Project) El Non-binding (All olher commercial proJecte)Revlew ls bv: tr Plannlog Board E Dpghn Revlcw CommitteepEsrofl ngvtEw confrlEuT gHEEr89.11044TownYarmouthat:128,on a motlon hy charlte Adamt seconded hy chrtswncent, the Deslgn Revlew commtuee (t'Rc) voted (&6;;';it;;r-iht Jun. 14, 2022 DRC medtns at 5:a3 PM'Ptolect Summaw1tr#rii-iu#m*fi1iq'iR.AD and vcoD VC3. The Apprcant is proposing il JJniitiilt'" tio' tatimonopore coirmunrcarion Tovrrer foruo to four carriers with .rccessory ground equpm#i E"plr"rg1tt"t manrLis navi been provlded fom the 4/s122DRC meerins showing ;;;#d;Jrel ioivir cJliig.tiili,iiurate a crocrt&Er, and a iTore derailed anemativesiting analYsis.ffi #ill;J*:i,ffi i#',"ii!ffi !$riilld0ff '#itx*Stffi '$l:fi !rncruded supptementar ,iJtii"i., iil, "-iiio_"ciimuatel ctocR tower iJ htue ttre antennas, and can includecrocks on ail thrse srdes. He noted the photoainiuiJiions ai tourtocauonr "no w"r rooking for feedback fom theonb. He also noted the revlsed project planc'DRC Oues{ons & Dlgcumlons:chrrs Vrncenilikes the 3-regged concept and wourd rike to see three crocks on it. Attomey $ousa also noted thiecould be a focal Polnt ln Town.Charlie Adams asked lf the clocks were operatlonal, and Attorney Souea eaid they would be'steve o,Neir asked rf antennas wourd be rocatqd behind the crock paners and the materiar for the side panels'Attorney sousa rndicate;ffi ;;d;;;s wJuio ue rlc"tiJ oeLrnd, usini. a raoio iruqu"ncv (RF) transparent material'sean Gormrey indrcated the paner material*"i-i6iiir"rs anb lrrg-reos ire mide oirt of steer. The otock is aspectalctook made to arrowhiiirequency ro g";dil'itirdl: 1d q !;1t asled iuout backlishtino or llluminationof the crock to be seen at nrght, sean Gormreyinomted'r'e is not, sure-,i i;; ;iik ;il ui oacltit. Mr' o'Neilapprectated trytng to wor[ on lfre aestgn to ""toiiR"'J"-th;;6;d gyl$ noi convlnced this ls the best locationand was ress impressed wrth the aftcrnative *liiJrl.' i" teit tnei toortre paitr of reast resistance, and couldG,damsat:
reach out to the Town on Town'owned pr9R9{V1 especially along Buck-lsland Road' He noted tho procass forlli,?:::1,'.:i#:t#fi,8t*,,,lxlffaffin:::ln:t?l.i;l:!i:'*Ti*;il:ul'$,iilxn;,i'i,l:flTil''"T'?::that mrsht be vrabre, eepeciary the Davenport pd"Jiffiffi;; il;iib Loil.'n" *ourdrke to oee more effort atboiing-at other altos beeides this one'charlre Adams does not feel enough has been done on tndrng another rocatron. As far as the deeign is concemed,wourd be rn favor or moie Ja co'ro64 rt,,re simi;ii; ii^" Et tre exampiei'ltiiirt"Jiriodte left) as the DRcsi,lird"rrttl"JrJ for cape cod style archltecturc'soha, usmanr showed the prot coverage laps.Ior the aroa incruding gg Buck rsrand Road whtch drd not cover thearea needed. ne noteJltrly also bo[ed at otner ;iies ana coverage t"pt tnU fi"ight scenarios as part of theCape Cod Commlsslon Procese'chrls Vlncent tndicated he was okay with the looation due to the corerage neede'charrie Adams asked about the tower rocated across the street at the post offrce, Attomey soqslr noted that thespacins inside thc tnr"dilliiJ-cnr,n t"oii.""rli;^6;;ftni'p"rif ""n:i'tJnttin todem'5G antennas andorovide a, needed ,"r"*""]'nrJo, Verrion r, "t inlioil"iio iit'" rofr.t i#i;;",id ;ot serve the needs of AT&Tbnd T-Mobile anO woutOiit-atOw f6r SC coverage, so ttrey chose a dlfferent design'Attornev sousa noted that tha Davenports.received a certifledlrtlail and spokc in opposition to the cape codcommiision onr. xatrvfrrii;;"-h;'ti;rid"d ii;;i#i;;t l"rorryug.i dtthe o"u'ihportq fgr the appllcant to;i:'ifr ;::t"'n*ff #i,lil:i,*if,illfi1r;:hi*{f i:i#1"i#;;lffi {:,g'H'g";fiorocess and ha sone d;;fi ttt" Cip" Cod commission wllh a favorablhrougn the alternative sites that were revlewes'Drck Martin noted that he understande the need ror coverage in the area. and doesn't thrnk thrs is a bad eite' butwourd *kE to 86e as mucn uutrer as poseibre "" itl, .itl-iJ'"urr"ntrv n"*rri'*""0",i. -HJ atso felt 110' ls tall andnot rhrlned w*h rhe oestsn and wanied s-oryl*;T;i'.i."** lq: lii; ; ;;k6t*r rather than a larse sign'*rilril:,it,f,,';i:1"ffi flsJ',ifr hl"fiki"ThT'iTtr$ilitiii$'fr t$J#*#FJlw#*:i;ffi''h*" sr,ioins *-iru;ili;fv 9G9-tl-i"!r"8:lrlfff',rt:,'ii? rrlightwqs reouce{jg-'d' "iieaav, anofl} n:,,:l*li*?f,,Hlff"lffilii1,01ffi''n"*1. ;;;lJii;'th; ffi;;6-be more attractive ir need thislocaiion and helght.soha, usmani noted that the three-sided dgsrqn ie neoded as the antennae transmit rn three dlrections' so thisrits we, wrth a 3-regged versus 4-regged *trurt ir". "iil?rr*t r"g arso rmp"cie iransmrssione, Kathv wlliamsshared her versron of the Jesign ereirlnts *t irr.,'ii."riJ upine'to{"." t" iili"lil"* sign ,ke (see atached) andsuggested orienrng rhe ;;;iil; t" oe seen troiliiri" Ie tliu"ring.wEs'ta;;'J"ir"-rrnor*6 said the 3'lessedf'.T'fl pmTi[:ltTd#iid11ff $;ffi#:l:,,";jHit"xH['iJifi ffi1lb:?,turnngtmavmpaotMr. Marirn rnquired about the randscaping pran and askad about the circres on the pran facing Route 28' Jegeeiinotiino not",j those are proposed bushes'srTlNG STEATEGESSect, 1. Streetgcape E N/A n Meets standards' or E Dlsorepancles:There are no new hurdrngs proposed whrch courd be rocated adJacent to the roadway to deline ths streetscape'
Sect. 2. Tenant Soaceq I Xn tr Meets Standards' or E Diecrepanclee:sect.3.DcllncstreetEdgeElvntrMeetsStandardg,orBDisoepancles:Sect.4,$hleldLaroeBuildinoeEN/AtrMeetsstandards,orEDlecrepanclos:Sect, 5. Deglgn-a 2nd Storv E N/A tr Meels Standarde' or E Discrepancles:B t'tlR g Meets Standarde' or El Dlacrepancles:Sect, 7. Landecaoe Buffere/Screenlng g N/A El Mogts standEfde, or El Dlscrepanciee:ftlstmpoulbletotandgcape|butfe.rall0.,tower.lfthtstocatton'sdetormtnedtobetheonlyvlableop*on, confnue to ,ii;fiiiiia reaecun'iiJ"ii]dlo;ii uicea oi in" comments trom the DRCmeattng,The ground Qqutpment and lranslonnsr should be futly jcreened wtth plants large enough to ecreenthe tattest agutryant Et Inttlrt ptanUng. Xyii}iini ifis1ng trgal itoig the nolth'and west sldee ofthe tower chouu oe aiiiiJlo'ii ,i^-or"a "J inii'i" niiifr* ii n ptaie ac theg' trees pravtda sometandsc aPe buflerh gkc toen I ng'Poolace anv dead etrcsttrees and lnstlt n6w trees every 20' (where posslble) atong Route 2E and Foresf Road'ifr in-ri*-ritne*vleterlgeandbuff erthepropeily'Fenctng arcund tlln equlpment area should be cedar'Sect.8'ParkinoLotVieibllityBN/AtrMeetsstandards,ortrDlecrepancles:Sect. 9' Break uo Laoe Parkino Lots e N/A n Meotc $landards, ortJ Diecrepanclee:Sect'l0.LocetgUtilltl€sUndgroround,ElN/AtsMcetsSt$dards,orBDigcngpancfus;$ect.11'ShleldLoadinoArgasmN/AtrMoetsStandErds.or[lDiscrepanclee:#tr:ir##fi:iti{:r:$ect. 1. Break Doygn Building Mass - Multiole Bldos, E wR n Meot* $landardr' or t3 Dlsorepandee:gect. 2. Break Down BUilding Maes - sub-Nlasse! B N/A 0 Meets standards' or fl Dircropanoles:Sect. 3, Vary Faoade Line.g tr ntR n Meots Slandards' or o Dlscrepancies:[ect. 4;Varv Wall Heiohts E rutn n Meote Standarde' or D Dlecrepanclee:Sect. 5. Varv Roof Llnes tr t$tn g Meets Standards' or E Discrepanciea:SecJ.6.BrinqDownBuildingEdoesEt{/AuMegts$landards,orEDiscrepanciee:Sect. 7. Vary Buildlng Mat'ls For Deoth E NIA o Meels Standards, or tr Discrepancies;Etr NIA U Meots Slandards' or E Dlscrepancies:,sect. L lncorporate Pedestrian-ccaled Feqtures EN N/A tr Meots $tandards' or E Dlscrepancles:Sect.lg.lncoroorateEngllfy-efflcientDesiqnElN/AtrMeetsStandards'orEDiscrepancles:
NoxtgtGpfortpphcenl@GotoSttePlanFtevtewIlR€|umtoDcsignRevtewforFormalRevtewon a mollon by chrts wnccnl, seoonded by.chartte Adams, rhr- Dealgn Rgvlcw commlflee (DRc) votcrl (3'0) toeppr,ov. these DRC ciiil,iiJ-ii .;",ittrg.;ir;;;"i;; n,i 1uh9 .ii"-ibii i"etini ror'the proposedeommunlcailon, towet and ground equlp^rnt ri"i-ii nourc zc, soullr Yarmoullt'Recetved bY--l\ /d-"e#/.4J| (rnf,zATTACHInEfTIT$ to June 11,2o22Meetlng (also referio Aprll 5, 20t2 meallng melorlrlr|Juno 14, 2022 Agondt416122 ORC Commrnt Shogtiiimprer of cdl Tower Clocls from Amerlclockil;ffi;;f"tio""i - Yarrnouth Plannlng DlvlrlonaaIatDRCoooooAoollcrtlon:tr{"'id.'iriizlcttorlrornAttorncyRlcrdosoumptr6to Slmutr*on ot ctol[i;ffi iouiiocrrronc ol exirtlng rnd propoeedlulrru.t*n;t#l"J:l;l$rilfi, prorcrn rrosrsn croup, LLc, dcrod Aet . zo, ?022- r 3P - Overrll Slts Han. P8-l - Prrtlrl glte Plrn. F$.2 - Prrtlrl 9ltc Flensn ;"iTt;f*l;|:Sr:f& prorc'r ou'br croup, LLC, drtod st12tzzunl*r otherwleenotod:Ex]*tlng Condllorc, drrlod W lNA-l: Aerlrl I USOS flltpA.2r ComFllcd Plot PlanA-t: Ovcnll Slte Plrnn+i ComPound Plrn & ElcvatlcnA-6: Phntlng PlrnSE-ll Sltlng ElovatlontD-l: Octeilcci-l ir CAa: co"APPllcant odrllrEl'-'i:-Et*ron conti6l Phn & oetalleT-l: Tltlc $hcetc-lr Abuttcc Plen &
Cell Tower Clocks Photo Galleryl\,\.*-elocks/lery/cell-towercom/gahttps://americlock.
d\a *iioP uts '5 'j FS aairlv t:fiP,rtIC.4 CA-: rr;lcF cdffc :c.l:u:rrlr4!:oitrrLs Iitr i-scha lf!-li :e'i*rr ar-ro :rr ti,' 'trNsn4lr JHeDUcL: rtupva\i t€ts,N Rt'{5Y ii^ilgretilr $aaorLiteH^lt iF) tr 1^L: ^{r!rN^iti-' :.D*i'- -{-a a\-T::.*€i<-4,;t€?fCONCEPTS - CLOCK TOWER CONSIDERAfi ON 5ILU72 -Yarnouih Planning Divisioni vn iegnn+ rcodt ttr^r[lilAtr /ii 9 I^U SIE$N^5IIz\nE-9I:E!-:E*Ie33dIE9-Ir{ : )rilll :acE I'.I'I1liI:_'3IiiIiI?iiIiIi iari{ \'P\ Ai&r il, & rrutt!t;Es. {-} t€:. !r€rr:r lt) 'xai?uucr rus!f,-irr rot{F r.ta(P) torr rac .? s 4.9r': rcT:,- {oaB,t: q Lt4 iO: l:c{Pr {qio?GL c6g€ra -fa!i):-.r +*t\c.ISLisd XJ;aNAL t2\trlxav^lrN ! Fi!?49^B fF&:Srts 6^x & StuClsALa:idtr! uli& val g s.:c@^u *ra 6oE:hsLi€cryi$AB5 iBY 0hl6)ELEVATIONrowER)+*=#=-;
SITE PLAN REVIEW COfi,IMENT SHEETFormal ReviewParcel: 189.150Date: J192022Lt.rs lllSouthB-2Proiect $unlmarvProposedwirelesstelecommunicationfacilitymonopoleCommunicationTowerandgroundequipment'CommentsZ /l@)^rrrorno: property is located in the 82 zoning district Proposal for a 110'cell tower will require relief from severalffi::':,""t"?,:il:"P'{1il" ,orn of yarmouth by speciar permit per section 408 4 of the Zonins Bvlaw from the ZoninsBoard of APPeals.section 4og.4.1states that the ZBA may alter or waive one or more requirements of section 408 if it finds that thearteration or waiver of the requirements witt'ioiu"rig"t* ir*,tne inte"n-i oi ftr" uvr"* Applicant requested severalwaivers from certain sections of the zonins fiiyllGl{tpri"Ji"r i"'spR.1h; purpoi;6 of spR is to identifv plans that;"n:li:lr1$:1,:J,ii;l#i1;3ffi*ifiiJ:;,J#,;ff?13ffi[ig:" sharr be requested directrv rrom the ZBA rromrheforowing sections. The proced.ure for this i, noi .r"ui, no*"06r, i*orii "r**e it tak"s prace in person at the hea.ng's*"tion?og'o.3 #1,#1c - Scaled plans and tree cover'Section408,6,2#5regardinglocationsofotherpersonalwirelessfacilities.s;;iil 40s.6'3#2A- sight line representation's;;ifi 408,6.3 #2D - Visual impact photographs's;;iil 408'6.3 #38 - security barrier cutaway view'Section 408.6,3 *3O Exiiting and proposed tree / planting heights'S""ii"^ 408.6.3 #3E - Grade changes and contours'Confirm with ZBA that the criteria ror aoe.d.i";iiliioon test) has been met or schedule with ZBA'R.,flmfi*;:;i; HffJl?':fill"nTilt3i)i"3f."*' : y ?:ylunication racitities shatt be desisned and sired so asto have the least adverse visuat effect on iii'iiiion;;nt. onu s;;;:;;;;iiii'o ii*note tvpe towers are permissibte'Lattice towers, ort the use af ground anchors and/or guy wires are prohibited'ln accordance wifr section 4og.7.3appri."ni i"* nriJrin ot prouing iiufto[cation on another structure is not feasible'ivi;];;" gooo taiih eif;rt to co-locite per 408'7'3 1#'s 1'2'3'Section 40g.7.g.Z- Applicant must providJ'*iiti"n tt"i.t"ni tnut co-location is not feasible to the ZBA'ffl,[t, r:::f ;il,ytr#i#il*;l*::i'tm[?'d$ff'1"J'3:lJf*.ted pwsF sha,, nor project higher than tenfeet above or tree canoPY'section 40g.7 ,g rail zones. communication towers, whother free standing or part of another structure or buirding, must beset back from ail property tines ay at teast tnJ iiai'irigit ot nr,toii'iii,i\w[tir" and its apnurtenances' lt is not clear atthis time if far zonescan incrude parking J;;;;ffpilo ruiruing]'"-r ti'!"rri'r" propertv icould not locate a lightingBf'?,ff 8X?J::ill""iiffi3i'f'T"k ft Pl?l:I,l"lP 'l:*":':::'$i:^in[:IiJtrJlt;1llii: fi:il:iffJ,Y,i.'"'section 408.10. Section 408.1 1 requrres-inipedtion ny owners "*p"ril".g,"il""ri "u"w 2 years and that documentation to6e suppfieC to the Building Department for the file'
I Communiw Development and Plannino;,Ar pbnning Efforts & Zoning: Throughout the cape cod c_ommission Deveropment of .Regional lmpact (DRl) process'. comment retters were submitted by the io*"-Fi"*r, ptanning-Boria unb Town Adnilnistrator expressing seriousconcerns about the height, location uno aesttretics of this cell tor"i'i,iIliiniv uiriol. ro"ation within our main commercialcorridor. yarmourh is itriving to bette.tr;il;iil iuJ.u"iop*"nt o?'o]ri"flo,lte i8 corridor beins front and center in ourpranning efforts. Through zoning, qrow!! ,l""iiu, zones, bpportr'"itv r"r'-r, rirLn piunnrng, riastewater initiatives andMassDor streetscape improvementr, *" "r. concentrating ,""or#i rnJ rbn"v to'improve this corridor and create anenvironment that fosters investment. rnl, ?o*ui iou* notiit wur ou-r visron for our main commercial corridor' nor does itcomply with intent oi Section aOe of our roniig oytaw, requiring many *aivers from these standards including:. 40g.7.1 General. All communications Facilities shall be designed and sited so as to have the least adversevisual effect on the environment't 40g.T.s.r scenic Landscapes and Vistas - personar \A/ireless service Facilities shall not be located within openareas that are discernable from prffi" touOt, t"cieationat areas' or residential devetopment'c408.7,6'lHeight,General.Regardlessofthetypeofmount,PersonalWirelessServiceFacilitiesshallbenohigher than ie,.,-r"jt aoou" ttre au-eiage heilni ol oiiuings within 300 feet of the proposed facilitv': 4ag.7.6,2 Height, Ground-Mounted Facilities. Ground-mounted Personal wireless service Facilities shall notproject higher ihan ten feet "bou"*ii.,e;;rs. ruito.ing h"ili'ii itir''*i" are no buildings within 300 feet' thesefacitiries "'ffi#ild;.iru;;;r-ih;;'Ln i""iiooue thdaveLse tree canopv heisht'. 40g.7Ja3 camouflage by Vegetation: lf communications Facilities are not camouflaged from public viewingareas by existing buitdings o, structures, they shail n" *urro,ino;Jlv-nrtrot gf dense tree growth and understoryvegetation in alidirections to creaie an effective y"u-ou-no uiu"in,tr"t Ground-mounied Personal wirelessservice Facilities shall provide a vegetated buffer of suffi"i"ni rr"W and depth to effectively screen the facility'The tower is highlv visible due to its height and the removal of the taller trees along the south and east side of the tower'essentially creating "n op*n area and "fir"in"ling all significant"";;il fto* noilt" Ze and some of Forest Road' Theproposed prantingi wlronry screen tn" gl;iJ;quipmlntwnicrr is"ioi'iiouseo insioe a structure' but is ground mountedin a fenced in area (screening of the nao rnou,ite'o transtor*"r"rn-i ;;;|";il;i oJ dead buffer tree should also beprovided). rne towiiooes not-compty *iitr tn" n"igfit iequiremens i,"t ub*utu it is less than 200'' The bylaw says 10'above the tree rine, but in no """* **"""jing z00rtin ci"u tner""a'rl";;ryAitd; in tne area;, so a waiverwould berequired.Aesthetics: lt is impossible to camouflage or screen a 110' tall cell tower which is further exacerbated by the removal ofthe taller stand of trees along Route 2g. i.'"ftt!i"pii"n wo.rlld n" io-""moutlage the tor,ver ln plain sight to make it a focalpoint rather *ran viiuar crutier. However, in" "ppiilunr" .utrgrpj i" loii"it ti'L aesthetic concerns-of this highly visiblesite by designing in* to*".. to simurate " ""r*r"t5**i, iu nignv'inJo;;;"i; ihe design.as presented reads rike a largesign from a freeway and racks the appropriii"li*ioio"taitJano o?"iir "i"r"nts..lt is-also ieferred to as a church toweron the site ptans and no clocks are shown. - without it neing propertv i;rig."J, ttre larger "clock towei' may end up havingmore negative visuat impacts, with three iarie Z.S' diame[ei.supdti;;E;;d tnreil+ wide x 42'5' long "clock" faces'rather than an obvious monopole cett towel."aotn design options aie [etrimentar to the goals the Town has been workingon for decades for enhance Route 28'Legar control: The Appricant needs.to have some form of regal control over the fall zones that also prohibits removal ofthe trees reried upon for screening in tn" ,iprication materi"ars ' pi""iJ" "n *ur"t"nt for the stormwater swales andinfitttution oasin, clrrently shown outside of any easement area'ApplicationAnalysis:Theapplicanth,aspreviouslydiscountedtheuseofaConcealedAntennaMonopole(CAM),useofother existing towErs, and ruled out otneiaiternutiue locations; ,no rJr ,* pr""iJed documentation on coverage gap andneed for the tocation and height. As this JiipiiJ"ii"i ir nionrv-t".r*i""i ir-nitur", the Planning Division recommends thatthe Zoning Board of Appears en-gage." pT#i"uil* of tie'speciai-Feimit application mateiials using the provisions ofch.53G anO proioi irp|.it to the B'oard as part of the Hearing process.consqrvation:Notpresent.Aportionofthesiieisinthefloodplain'coordinatewiththeConservationAgent.DesignReview:RefertotheattachedJune14,2022DesignReviewCommittee(DRC)CommentSheet''$ Enqineerinq:i \-- . provide drainage calculations to support the drainage design plan'/ t r Provide operation and maintenance plan'
^ rc; permits for fue| storage' lock.box for gate, clear tnarkings for gate access, some type of deterrent for@;#-,ffi;H# io luaou," 6r crimbing p"g"'io--pr"u;nt purroi. who mav enter the fenced areaHealth: Not Present.-fVe!gl: No corrments - LJRRead & Received bY APPlicant(s)t.''l.t t