HomeMy WebLinkAboutDMF comment 4-19-2023The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Division of Marine Fisheries
251 Causeway Street, Suite 400, Boston, MA 02114
p: (617) 626-1520 | f: (617) 626-1509
www.mass.gov/marinefisheries
MAURA HEALEY KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL REBECCA TEPPER RONALD S. AMIDON DANIEL J. MCKIERNAN
Governor Lt. Governor Secretary Commissioner Director
April 18, 2023
Yarmouth Conservation Commission
1146 Route 28
South Yarmouth, MA 02664
Dear Commissioners:
The Division of Marine Fisheries (MA DMF) has reviewed the Notice of Intent (NOI) by the
Aunt Edith’s Road Association to reconstruct a pier, 2 ramps, and 6 floats within the Bass River
at 0 Aunt Edith’s Road in the Town of Yarmouth. The project was reviewed with respect to
potential impacts to marine fisheries resources and habitat.
The project site lies withing mapped shellfish habitat for bay scallop (Argopecten irradians),
American oyster (Crassostrea virginica), and northern quahog (Mercenaria mercenaria). Waters
within the project site have habitat characteristics suitable for these species. Land containing
shellfish is deemed significant to the interest of the Wetlands Protection Act (310 CMR 10.34)
and the protection of marine fisheries. The above species were not found during a shellfish
survey conducted on March 20, 2023 with a quahog rake along the pier and float sites.
The project site overlies salt marsh vegetation. Salt marsh provides a variety of ecosystem
services, including habitat and energy sources for many fish and invertebrate species [1-2].
The Bass River has been identified by MA DMF as diadromous fish passage, migration, and/or
spawning habitat for alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus), American eel (Anguilla rostrata), white
perch (Morone americana), and Atlantic tomcod (Microgadus tomcod) [3].
The Bass River acts as winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) spawning habitat.
Winter flounder enter the area and spawn from January through May; demersal eggs hatch
approximately 15 to 20 days later. The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission has
designated winter flounder spawning habitat as a “Habitat Area of Particular Concern” (HAPC).
In the previous stock assessment, the winter flounder stock was classified as overfished with
spawning stock biomass in 2019 estimated to be only 32% of the biomass target [4]. Spawning
stock biomass in 2021 was estimated to be 101% of the biomass target based on a new
recruitment stanza focusing only on the past twenty years [5]. Given the new status of the winter
flounder stock, every effort should be made to protect the species and its spawning habitat.
MA DMF offers the following comments for your consideration:
• A time-of-year (TOY) restriction should be observed on all in-water activities to protect
sensitive life stages of winter flounder. No in-water, silt-producing activities should take
place from Jan 15th – May 31st of any year [6].
• According to the plans, grated decking is proposed to reduce shading impacts to salt marsh
production. MA DMF conducted two field studies to assess the relationship between shading,
marsh growth, and dock design; these studies collectively indicated that a height to width (H:W)
ratio of 1.5:1 reduced shading and marsh loss relative to the typically required 1:1 H:W ratio for
both traditional plank decking and grated decking designs [7-9]. Grated decking alone did not
reduce shading impacts or associated marsh loss. As a result, grated decking should not be used
as a substitute for adequate height above salt marsh vegetation. MA DMF recommends
establishing a 6-foot minimum separation between the lowest hanging stringer and salt marsh
and/or reducing the proposed 4’ wide pier width to maintain a 1.5:1 H:W ratio across the full
extent of the marsh.
• While the listed shellfish species were not found within the top 6 inches of substrate during the
March shellfish survey, the project area is suitable shellfish habitat.
• All piles that will be removed should be fully removed from the substrate - rather than cut
at the base – since the area is suitable shellfish habitat [7].
• MA DMF recommends that all staging and storage of construction equipment and material be
located on the upland side of the project site.
• Any activities requiring a barge should be restricted to 2 hours before and after high tide
to prevent barge grounding in mapped shellfish habitat.
Questions regarding this review may be directed to Amanda Davis in our New Bedford office at
Amanda.davis@mass.gov.
Sincerely,
Amanda Davis
Environmental Analyst
MA Division of Marine Fisheries
cc:
Mark Burgess, Ocean Engineering
John Logan, Emma Gallagher, Holly Williams, MA DMF
Conrad Caia, Yarmouth Shellfish Constable
Robert Boeri, CZM
AD/eg
Reference:
1. Boesch, D.F. and R.E. Turner. 1984. “Dependence of Fishery Species on Salt Marshes:
The Role of Food and Refuge.” Estuaries 7(4):460-468. https://doi.org/10.2307/1351627.
2. Deegan, L.A., J.E. Hughes, and R.A. Rountree. 2000. “Salt marsh ecosystem support of
marine transient species.” In: M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, eds. Concepts and
Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology: Kluwer Academic Publisher, The Netherlands.
pp. 333-365
3. MA DMF. MassGIS Data: Diadromous Fish. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/massgis-
data-diadromous-fish. Accessed February 8, 2023. 2023.
4. ASMFC. 2020. Southern New England Mid-Atlantic Winter Flounder 2020 Assessment
Update Report. http://www.asmfc.org/uploads/file/6008bd822020_SNE-
MA_WinterFlounderAssessmentUpdate.pdf
5. ASMFC. 2022. Southern New England Mid-Atlantic winter flounder 2022 Management
Track Assessment Report. Compiled June 2022. https://apps-
nefsc.fisheries.noaa.gov/saw/sasi.php
6. Evans, N.T., K.H. Ford, B.C. Chase, and J. Sheppard. 2011. Recommended Time of Year
Restrictions (TOYs) for Coastal Alteration Projects to Protect Marine Fisheries
Resources in Massachusetts. Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical
Report, TR-47. https://www.mass.gov/doc/time-of-year-recommendations-tr-
47/download
7. Logan, J.M., A. Boeri, J. Carr, T. Evans, E.M. Feeney, K. Frew, F. Schenck, and K.H.
Ford. 2022. A review of habitat impacts from residential docks and recommended Best
Management Practices with an emphasis on the northeastern United States. Estuaries
Coasts 45: 1189–1216. https://www.mass.gov/doc/dock-bmp-
recommendations/download
8. Logan, J.M., A. Davis, C. Markos, K.H. Ford. 2018. “Effects of docks on salt marsh
vegetation: An evaluation of ecological impacts and the efficacy of current design
standards.” Estuaries and Coasts 41:661–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0323-1
9. Logan, J.M., S. Voss, A. Davis, K.H. Ford. 2018. “An experimental evaluation of dock
shading impacts on salt marsh vegetation in a New England estuary.” Estuaries and
Coasts 41:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0268-4