HomeMy WebLinkAboutCRUZ Compiled NOI Package
WRS Engineering LLC
67 Stetson Street
Hyannis, MA 02601
508-776-0956 royokurowski@gmail.com
June 22, 2023
By Hand Delivery
Conservation Commission
1146 Route 28
South Yarmouth, MA 02664
Re: Paul and Nancy Cruz Notice of Intent Application Package
Proposed pier and lift
52 Prince Road
Yarmouth, MA
Map 29 Parcel 88
On behalf of our client, Paul and Nancy Cruz, we are submitting 1 original and 7 copies of a proposed pier and lift
for your review, including a Notice of Intent application filing package and administrative checklist.
Please schedule this for the July 6, 2023 public hearing. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please give our office a call. Thank you.
Sincerely,
WRS Engineering LLC
Roy E. Okurowski P.E.
1
d
Proposed pier and lift
NOTICE OF
INTENT FILING
Filing Date:
6/22/23
52 Prince Road
Yarmouth, MA
Prepared by: WRS
Engineering
Paul and Nancy Cruz
Paul and Nancy Cruz – NOI 52 Prince Road 6/22/23
2
Table of Contents
1. eDEP online filing application including original owner signature
2. Town of Yarmouth Administrative Checklist for NOI
3. Existing and Proposed Conditions narrative
4. Construction Sequence narrative (equipment, staging locations, etc.)
5. Alternatives Analysis narrative
6. Shellfish survey results and report
7. Performance standard narrative (310 CMR 10.00 and Town of Yarmouth Wetland Bylaw
Chapter 143
8. Certified abutters list and Notice to Abutters
9. Additional information (research, deeds, tax assessors card)
10. Certified mail receipts
11. Copies of checks
12. 1 original and 7 copies of Notice of Intent Plan
Paul and Nancy Cruz – NOI 52 Prince Road 6/22/23
3
Property Description
The property is located adjacent to Mill Creek on the northern shoreline off Lewis Bay. The
property is located within the buffer zone to coastal beach, salt marsh, land subject to coastal
storm flowage, land containing shellfish and coastal bank (manmade bulkhead). Portions of the
property are located within a FEMA mapped Zone AE EL 13 as shown on the most recent FEMA
map 25001C0569J effective date 7/16/2014.
The site contains a 15,517 SF lot with a single family dwelling recently renovated. There is an
existing bulkhead with multiple stairways that access the shoreline.
Project Description
The purpose of this project is to install a new elevated pile supported dock and mechanical lift.
(Note: No float or dredging will be required). In addition, 2 small stairways that lead down to
the beach (shown on plan) are proposed to be replaced.
This Notice of Intent filing proposes the construction of a new pile supported dock and
mechanical lift with no float, extending 77.3' seaward of Mean High Water (MHW). The existing
dock to the West was a similar type of project and has the highest population of healthy
shellfish in the area. The structure will be a wood pile supported structure with a mechanical lift
Paul and Nancy Cruz – NOI 52 Prince Road 6/22/23
4
with no float or dredging proposed. The boat lift will be placed on the outer end of the pier and
incorporate an ‘auto stop’ to prevent the lift framework from being any lower than 3’ above the
existing natural grade. The construction equipment anticipated for the project will be a small
barge with a crane and an impact or vibratory hammer that will be utilized to drive the piles. The
barge will be used at high tide as to not ground out at low tides. To our knowledge the
proposed dock meets all of the requirements set forth in the town bylaw for docks and floats,
and current DEP regulations with one exception. We do actually meet the requirement for 3' of
water within 80' of mean high water. We propose to request a waiver to move the dock in
approximately 3' shoreward in order to keep the float aligned with the existing floats in the area.
Additionally the lift design and it’s auto stop features will eliminate any concerns for bottoming
of the boat and its aluminum frame support system. The pier construction project is similar to
the dock to the west that was previously permitted and constructed. We note that there are
existing moorings in this area that have not been approved by the proper authorities and the
moorings have been observed in various locations, since they are not specifically fixed and are
frequently relocated at will.
Resource Area Determination
The project site is located on the North shoreline of the salt creek off Lewis Bay. Mean High
Water and Mean Low Water were calculated based on the nearest tidal benchmark and mapping
of the salt marsh and compared against other similar projects in the area.
310 CMR State Performance Standards
The project proposes the construction of a pile supported wood dock and mechanical lift that
extends from the existing bulkhead to the lift as shown on the project plans. The areas directly
affected by the project are salt marsh, coastal bank, LSCSF, coastal beach, and an area
containing shellfish. The project as proposed will not have any adverse effects to the
surrounding resource areas which include the areas listed above.310 CMR 10, sections 10.21
through 10.37. The work proposed in this area consists of driving some piles to anchor the
dock/lift. The area consists of the coastal beach, land containing shellfish, land under ocean, salt
marsh. Therefore, the project as proposed can be permitted under 310 CMR 10.30 (6) through
(8).
Salt Marsh – Both types of high and low marsh were encountered and are shown on the project
plans. A minimum number of proposed pilings will be driven around the salt marsh. The height
of the dock is the required minimum over the marsh, with 3/4 deck board spacing as to not
prohibit sunlight from reaching the marsh. Therefore, the project as proposed can be permitted
under 310 CMR 10.32 (5).
Coastal Beach – A portion of the dock is within a coastal beach area. The disturbance to the
coastal beach consists of reconstructing wood pilings to support the dock. The disturbance to
the area from the construction effort is expected to be minimal. The project will not change the
role for the beach in storm damage prevention, flood control, or protection of wildlife habitat.
The piles also will not change the volume or form of the beach sediments, the ability of the
beach to respond to wave action, or the effect for any down drift beach. Therefore, the project
as proposed will not have any significant adverse impacts to the coastal beach can be permitted
under 310 CMR 10.27 (1) through (7).
Land Containing Shellfish – A portion of the dock is within land containing shellfish. The
disturbance to the area consists of constructing wood pilings to support the dock and the lift.
Paul and Nancy Cruz – NOI 52 Prince Road 6/22/23
5
The lift will not be less than the required height above the bottom at low tide. The disturbance
to the area from the construction effort is expected to be minimal and will not adversely effect
any shellfish. The project will not change what is relative to the bottom substrate, and therefore
have no significant impact to the following interests: alterations of water circulation, alterations
in the distribution of sediment grain size, alterations from natural drainage from adjacent land,
or changes in water quality. This includes but is not limited to, fluctuations in level of salinity,
dissolved oxygen, nutrients, temperature and turbidity, or the addition of pollutants. Therefore,
the project as proposed will not have any significant adverse impacts to the coastal beach can
be permitted under 310 CMR 10.34 (4) through (7).
Town of Yarmouth Performance Standards
2.10 Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage
(1) Preamble:
Land subject to coastal storm flowage are areas subject to coastal flooding during
moderate and severe weather conditions. Projects that occur within these areas
are likely to have adverse impacts on the following interests:
(a) Flood Control
(b) Storm Damage Prevention
(c) Prevention of Pollution
(d) Public Water Supply
(e) Private Water Supply
(f) Land Containing Shellfish
(g) Wildlife
(h) Wildlife Habitat
(i) Protection of Groundwater Supply and Quality
(j) Protection of Fisheries
Land subject to coastal storm flowage has the potential to provide Yarmouth a
profound service.
When coastal conditions are not the norm during extreme high tides and
hurricanes for example, the ability of the land to absorb flood waters and to buffer
more inland areas from flood and wave damage is imperative.
Since the floodplain contains areas, (as well as other wetland resources), in which
the water table is close to the surface, during a coastal storm, pollutants in the
floodplain, including the contents of septic systems and fuel tanks, are likely to
affect public and private water supply, groundwater quality, wildlife and wildlife
habitat, fisheries and shellfish. Storm damage prevention, as one of the interests
protected under the By-law, also come into play in the floodplain. Direct and
collateral damage can occur to man made structures in the floodplain area caused
by wave impacts and inundation by floodwaters and storm driven debris.
Approved at Public Meeting December 1st 2016, published December 12th, 2016
38
(2) Definition:
“Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage” are areas that extend up-gradient or
landward from the ocean and the ocean’s estuaries to a point where the maximum
lateral extent of floodwater will theoretically terminate based upon the 100 year
frequency storm. Said boundary shall be the relevant 100 year storm elevation
referenced within the latest available Flood Insurance Rate Maps provided by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Paul and Nancy Cruz – NOI 52 Prince Road 6/22/23
6
(3) Performance Standards: Any activity within land subject to coastal storm flowage which will
result in the building upon, removing, filling or altering land within 300 feet of a major estuary
defined in section 1.04 of these regulations shall meet the following requirements.
Notwithstanding this section 2.10, (3), beach nourishment and coastal engineering projects such
as bulkheads and seawalls may be allowed if they meet all other performance in these
regulations.
(a) Existing septic system and cesspool repairs will be allowed provided they
substantially meet all Title 5 and local Board of Health thresholds.
Not applicable to this project.
(b) All groundwater elevations shall incorporate seasonable adjustments if test
holes and or leaching components are 100 feet or closer from major estuaries.
Not applicable to this project.
(c) Any proposed deck, shed, or other similar structure must be securely anchored
to a footing or foundation.
Not applicable to this project.
(a) Docks and Piers
(1) Piers shall be constructed to minimize the blocking of sunlight to shellfish beds and grasses.
Piers should have planks running across the width with minimum spaces of approximately ¾
inches between planks, and be a maximum of four feet wide.
We meet this criteria.
(2) Piers shall not require the elimination of existing public or commercial moorings. Piers and or
vessels moored thereto shall not project into or impede navigation to and from a channel,
pier/dock, boat ramp, mooring area, town landing, town dock, or commercial marina.
We positioned the pier to not impede on navigation or mooring fields.
(3) Piers shall not be constructed so as to interfere with any longstanding public recreational use
of the waterway, e.g., an area used by sailboats tacking through a narrow waterway, an area
used by boaters or others because of unique wind or current conditions, a structure that would
interfere with public access to or from a way to water, nor impact town beaches and swimming
areas.
Not extending out far enough to interfere with channel.
(4) Public right of passage by foot across the beach in the intertidal zone, where permitted for
purposes of fishing and fowling under the Public Trusts Doctrine of the Colonial Ordinance, shall
be maintained.
Paul and Nancy Cruz – NOI 52 Prince Road 6/22/23
7
There is a 4’ minimum clearance for passage during most tidal cycles. MHW is forced against
existing bulkhead.
(5) The base of the pier shall be as close as possible to the center line of the lot, and it shall
project outwards at an angle as nearly perpendicular to the shoreline as possible.
We meet this criteria.
(6) The project plans and documentation shall include the following: Approved at Public Meeting
December 1st 2016, published December 12th, 2016 18
(a) Soundings shall be taken within two hundred (200) feet (seaward and lateral boundary) of
the dock/pier, to the closest marked or recognized navigable channel. Depth shall be measured
to the top surface of soft sediments. Soundings shall be of sufficient density to allow the exact
determination of water depths around the proposed pier and floats, and to the closest navigable
channel. The soundings shall show the MLW and MLLW in the areas where the proposed boat
will be berthed.
(b) Eel grass beds (seaward and lateral boundary) within one hundred (100) feet of the project.
Did you notice during your survey?
No eel grass beds were discovered during the hydrographic survey nor the shellfish survey.
Please refer to vicinity plan on soundings more than 200 feet from proposed pier.
(c) Marked or recognized navigation channels within two hundred (200) feet of the pier.
(d) Identify existing public or commercial mooring or navigational aids, within two hundred (200)
feet (seaward and/or lateral boundary) of the pier. A recent aerial photograph taken during the
summer boating season may be used for this purpose if desired. How do we retrieve this
information
Please refer to vicinity plan.
(e) Location of existing town, commercial or private piers, Town Landings. Town ways to water,
and public or private beaches within two hundred (200) feet of pier.
Please refer to vicinity plan.
(f) Shellfish propagation or relay areas within two hundred (200) feet of project, (data to be
obtained from Town of Yarmouth Natural Resources Department).
Not referenced in Shellfish Report.
(g) A description of all materials to be used and a narrative describing the implementation of the
project including methods of approach by construction equipment, and the method of
construction, including the method of pile installation.
Please refer to project narrative.
Paul and Nancy Cruz – NOI 52 Prince Road 6/22/23
8
(h) When near shellfish habitat, the type of precautions used to insure the barge and equipment
used will not damage shellfish habitat.
(i) Where the structure is seasonal or includes seasonal floats, a statement indicating the site for
winter storage and the method of hauling.
(j) Data shall be supplied to the Commission showing the time and date of the depth survey, the
existing weather conditions, the state of the tide and the actual depths measured from water
surface to the bottom. The methodology used to determine MLW, MLLW and MHW shall be
given. NAV88 referencing 0 as MLW.
(k) A shellfish survey conducted by a qualified marine or shellfish biologist or other acceptable
environmental professional to be approved by the Shellfish Constable including written results,
plan and methodology. A minimum of three (3) transects spaced every eight (8) feet shall be
performed from mean high water to a minimum of thirty (30) feet beyond the structure and shall
extend a minimum of twenty (20) feet beyond the Approved at Public Meeting December 1st
2016, published December 12th, 2016 19 widest portion of the structure. Each sample shall be
a four (4) feet by four (4) feet square spaced every ten (10) feet
Please refer to shellfish survey and report.
(7) Lights on piers, except lights necessary for safe navigation, shall be directed downwards and
shielded so as not to impair vision of persons navigating in the area, and to avoid disturbing
abutting property owners and potentially disrupting wildlife behavior.
Will comply.
(8) The project shall be clearly identified and staked or marked with a buoy at pier end, at the
time of submission, so that town personnel may inspect the site.
Completed. See picture.
Paul and Nancy Cruz – NOI 52 Prince Road 6/22/23
9
(9) Common “shared-use” docks/piers are encouraged as a way of preserving access by
shorefront property owners while reducing the overall number of docks and piers that might be
otherwise permitted. A common “shared-use” dock/pier is a water-dependent structure serving
two or more contiguous waterfront properties where each of the contiguous lots would qualify
for an individual private dock. They may include abutting properties with deeded or trust rights
to the waterfront properties. An essential element of any common dock shall be a finding by the
Commission that the number of potential docks in the immediate area has been permanently
reduced as demonstrated by the legal documentations submitted with the application. Common
docks/piers shall include but not be limited to yacht clubs, associations, governmental piers or
public marinas and private marinas. All common dock/pier applicants shall file the appropriate
deed restriction allowing for deeded easements and the prohibition of dock construction on the
non-host property(s).
Not applicable
(10) The maximum length of dock, pier and float configurations shall not be greater than eighty
(80) feet from Mean High Water. In addition, the water depth at the farthest point of the dock
and associated floats from shore shall be no less than three (3) feet at Mean Low Water, and this
Paul and Nancy Cruz – NOI 52 Prince Road 6/22/23
10
minimum depth must be available between the proposed structure and navigable channels
during Mean Low Water. No new dock/pier with a float shall be located in an area that does not
meet the minimum three foot water depth without dredging.
Requesting waiver, see above.
(11) Where there is an expansion of an existing dock, the Commission may require compliance
with all or part of these regulations.
Not applicable.
(12) New proposed docks, piers and floats (as defined in these regulations) shall not be allowed
within: (a) Seventy-five (75) feet, of adjacent docks, piers and floats, with the exception marinas.
(b) One hundred (100) feet, of a navigable channel or boat mooring. Please advise on how we
will meet this regulation.
We meet this criteria, please refer to vicinity map for distances to nearby piers.
(c) Two hundred fifty (250) feet, from a public boat ramp, public landing, or public swimming
beach. (d) No new pier or float system shall be located closer at any point than twenty-five (25)
feet to a property line, except, for a pier jointly owned and used by two (2) or more contiguous
shorefront properties, or written Approved at Public Meeting December 1st 2016, published
December 12th, 2016 20 permission from the abutters is obtained in order to minimize
environmental impacts such as the need for dredging. The twenty-five (25) foot setback shall be
measured from the outermost property lines of the applicable properties.
We comply with the 25 foot property line setback and are more than 75 feet from adjacent
docks
(13) All float configurations shall not exceed two hundred (200) square feet, with the exception
for Common “Shared-use” Dock/Pier proposals that may not exceed three hundred (300) square
feet. Standards shall be set for yacht clubs, association marinas, governmental piers or public
and private marinas on a case by case basis.
Not applicable, no float – only boat lift
(14) Proposed expansion of existing docks, piers and floats shall only be allowed where there is
no encroachment into navigable channels, mooring areas, or public swimming beaches. In
addition, proposed expansion shall not occur beyond eighty (80) feet from Mean High Water as
outlined above.
Not applicable
Paul and Nancy Cruz – NOI 52 Prince Road 6/22/23
11
(15) The Commission recommends the use of alternative materials that offer newer technology
and provide an ecologically betterment to the Resource Area. Preference will be given to grated
decking that maximizes light penetration and mono pole construction. If treated lumber is used
as a construction material, only non-leaching types of preservatives shall be allowed. Chromated
copper arsenate (CCA), creosote, or other chemically treated woods are prohibited within the
regulated resource area.
Requesting waiver to use CCA piles instead of the required ACQ or other pilings. We have
performed research and spoken to industry professionals and pile installations are determined
by the AWPA use category, salt or brackish water is a UC5 classification, “Marine Use Northern
Waters as stipulated in Technical Information for Homeowners and Building Officials” and based
on hazards for the exposure.
(16) Notwithstanding these criteria, certain areas shall be designated “No Dock/No Mooring
Zones”. “No Dock” and “No Mooring Zones” are depicted on Yarmouth GIS maps #’s 1 thru 7
entitled “Yarmouth Conservation Commission, No Dock/No Mooring Areas” and dated November
21st, 2016
Noted
(17) Notwithstanding section 1.09, 4(a), 1 thru 21, public projects that enhance fishing, fowling
and navigation may be allowed on a case by case basis when an overriding public benefit has
been demonstrated.
Not applicable
(18) Existing legal docks and piers that are destroyed by natural causes may be re constructed
to their original specifications, but with updated materials, as approved by the Conservation
Commission and/or the D.E.P. Chapter 91 Waterways License requirements. Such re-construction
must be filed for in the form of a Notice of Intent within three (3) years of the damage in order
to qualify for re-construction.
Not applicable
(19) Unpermitted structures may not be reconstructed, improved or extended without the
approval of the Commission and compliance with the regulations.
Not applicable
Alternatives Analysis
The proposed work consists of constructing a new dock with a lift. The project as proposed
occupies only a small area of the resource areas where the piles are driven and the lift is
Paul and Nancy Cruz – NOI 52 Prince Road 6/22/23
12
located, as such, the following analysis is offered to describe the available options for this
project.
OPTION 1: Do Nothing – If nothing is constructed boats will be brought to the shore and could
cause damage to the resource area Therefore, this is not the preferred option.
OPTION 2: Construct a lower dock and float that does not bridge the marsh or give it the
required sunlight. Therefore, this is not the preferred option.
OPTION 3: Construct a longer dock with a float that does not require dredging but does project
out farther into the navigation area which will obstruct local neighborhood watercraft traffic at
low tide.
OPTION 4: Project as proposed – The new dock and mechanical marine lift will be constructed as
to minimize all impact to coastal resource areas. The marsh and other resource will not be
permanently disturbed, and will remain subject to natural processes. Additionally no float or
dredging will be required, therefore, this is the preferred option.
Construction Protocol
The proposed work shall be performed with the minimum amount of equipment required to
obtain the project objectives. The staging area for materials will be from a working barge and/or
upland of applicants property. All equipment shall be stored on the barge and/or upland of
applicants property when not in use. When the equipment is not being utilized the barge shall
not come in contact with the marsh at any time and shall not be allowed to bottom out.
Pre-construction Meeting
Prior to construction, a pre-construction meeting shall be held on-site with the Contractor,
Property Owner, Conservation Commission and/or agent, and the Project Manager (WRS
Engineering LLC). The purpose of the meeting is to clearly delineate the limits of work and
access, as well as the staging area. The Contractor will describe the proposed means and
methods for performing the work within the requirements of the plans, order of conditions and
construction protocol. The contractor will comply with mitigation measures as established by
the Conservation Commission.
To be discussed at the meeting:
- Existing property conditions, necessary precautions to be taken by the Contractor;
- Means and methods for construction;
- Necessary post-construction remedial efforts
- Procedure for post construction inspection;
- WRS Engineering’s responsibilities for inspections and project coordination
During construction, the site shall be accessible for inspection during reasonable hours by all
parties, members of the conservation commission and their agents, and the Project Manager.
Post-construction meeting
Upon completion of construction, but prior to equipment being removed from the site, a post-
construction meeting shall be held on-site with the Contractor, Property Owner, Conservation
Commission and/or Agent, and the Project Manager (WRS Engineering LLC). The purpose of this
meeting is to determine that the project has been satisfactorily completed in accordance with all
permits, and that no additional work or mitigation is required by the Contractor.
Paul and Nancy Cruz – NOI 52 Prince Road 6/22/23
13
Restoration of Project Area
Upon completion of construction any and all areas disturbed by the construction effort shall be
returned as much as practical to their pre-construction conditions to the satisfaction of the
property owner and conservation agent. All disturbed marsh or vegetated areas shall be re-
vegetated with indigenous or grass vegetation to match pre-construction conditions for the
surrounding areas, or as determined during the preconstruction meeting.
John Lowell
P. O Box 501
South Dennis, MA 02660
April 12, 2023
TO: Conservation Commission
FROM: John Lowell
SUBJECT: Shellfish Survey, 52 PRINCE ROAD WEST YARMOUTH MA
SURVEY DATE: 3/29/23
CREDENTIALS AND EXPERIENCE of SURVEYOR:
• Shellfishing is the surveyor’s full time occupation, and he has been shellfishing on Cape
Cod since 1983
• Has held commercial and family licenses since the mid-90’s
• Aquaculture permit since 2003
• Interstate Wholesale Dealer license since 2006
• Shellfish Committee member for Town of Dennis since 2004
• Shellfish surveys and relays for the Town of Dennis since 2006
John Lowell
P. O Box 501
South Dennis, MA 02660
SITE LOCATION:52 PRINCE ROAD WEST YARMOUTH MA
DATE: 3/29/23
TIDE: Low, going
WEATHER: 50 degrees, sunny
SITE CONDITIONS
The site consists of an existing wooden seawall from the top of the coastal bank down to approx.
MHW. From the bottom of the wall there is approx. 20’ of marsh grass with a large ribbed
mussel population. There were some oysters observed as well. Samples from the edge of the
grass out to the 104’ mark revealed a significant quahog population.
TECHNIQUE
SUBTIDAL
70 sample plots were established 10’ apart laterally and 8’ apart heading out from the end of
wall. The samples were achieved using a 1/2” standard quahog rake.
PLOT# A B C D E
104’ 4LN 2Q 2CH SEED 3LN 2CH3Q 6Q 1LN 1CH
96’ 1LN 1LN 1Q 1CH 1CH 1Q 2CH
88’ 2Q 1Q 1CH SEED 2CH 1LN LN 3Q
80’ 1LN 2CH 2Q 1LN 3Q 1CH SEED 2Q 2CH 2Q
72’ 2LN 2CH 2Q SEED 5CH 1LN 2CH 2Q CH 2Q
64’ 1CH 1Q 1LN 1CH 2Q 1LN 2LN 4CH LN CH 3Q 3CH 2Q
56’ LN 5Q 1LN 3Q 2CH 1CH 2Q 1LN 2Q 2CH 2CH 3Q
48’ 2Q 2LN 4Q 1CH 1LN 2CH 4Q 2LN 4Q 5CH 2LN 1LN SEED 1Q 1CH
40’ 2LN 1CH 1LN SEED 1LN 1Q 1CH 1Q 1LN
32’ 2LN 2LN 2CH 0 0 1Q
24’ 0 0 0 0 0
16’ OY 0 0 0 0
8’ 0 0 0 0 0
00 0 0 0 0
OY = OYSTER
SHACK = DEAD SHELL
CH = CHERRYSTONE
Q = QUAHOG
LN = LITTLENECK
SEED = QUOHOG SEEDLING (<1")
KEY
TRANSECT#
SHELLFISH SURVEY PLOT RESULTS 3/29/23
52 PRINCE ROAD WEST YARMOUTH
1
-4
.
0
0
0
-
2
.
0
0
0
-3
.
0
0
0
-
1
.00
0
0
.0001.0002.000-3.0006.0007.0008.0000+00.001+00.001+43.170+50.000'ABCED16'32'48'64'80'96'8'24'40'56'72'88'104'OYSTERDEAD SHELLCHERRYSTONEQUAHOGLITTLENECKQUOHOG SEEDLING (<1")
29/ 87/ / /
PEARS PHILIP J
TUCKE SHEILA
100 CHAMBERLAIN RD
WESTFORD , MA 01886
29/ 88/ / /
CRUZ PAUL A
CRUZ NANCY D
574 SLOCUM RD
NORTH DARTMOUTH , MA 02747
29/ 86/ / /
TOMAIOLO PHYLLIS M
9 TUSCAN PL
SHREWSBURY , MA 01545-2207
29/ 89/ / /
ZORZI FAMILY LLC
45 PRINCE RD
WEST YARMOUTH , MA 02673
NOTIFICATION TO ABUTTERS UNDER THE
MASSACHUSETTS WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT &
TOWN OF YARMOUTH WETLAND BY-LAW, CHAPTER 143
In accordance with the second paragraph of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 131, Section 40,
you are hereby notified of the following:
A. The name of the applicant is ______Paul and Nancy Cruz_______________________________
B. The applicant has filed a Notice of Intent with the Yarmouth Conservation Commission, seeking
permission to remove, fill, dredge or alter an Area Subject to Protection under the Wetlands
Protection Act (MGL c. 131 s. 40 & Town of Yarmouth Wetland By-Law, Chapter 143).
C. The address of the lot where the activity is proposed is _____52 Prince Road______________
D. Proposed work is ________Proposed pier and lift _____________________
____________________________________________________________________________
E. Copies of the Notice of Intent may be examined at the Yarmouth Town Hall at the Conservation
Commission office between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday thru Friday. For more
information, call (508) 398-2231 ext. 1288.
F. Copies of the Notice of Intent may be obtained from either the applicant or applicant’s
representative. Applicant’s phone number _____________________________________
Or Applicant’s representatives phone number _______508-776-0956_____________________
G. Information regarding the date, time and place of the public hearing may be obtained by calling
the Yarmouth Conservation Commission office at (508) 398-2231 ext. 1288
H. Person sending this notification (applicant, representative or other)
Name _________Roy Okurowski, WRS Engineering LLC_________________________
Address ________67 Stetson Street________________________________
Town ____Hyannis_____________ State __MA_____ Zip __02601_______
Telephone _______508-776-0956________________________________
NOTES :
• Notice of the public hearing, including date, time and place will be published at least five (5)
days in advance in a newspaper of general circulation.
• Notice of the public hearing, including date, time and place will be posted in the Town Hall not
less than forty-eight hours in advance.
• You may also contact the Southeast Regional Office of the Department of Environmental
Protection at (508) 946-2800 for more information about this application.
-3.000-1.0000.0001.0002.000-3.0006.0007.0008.0001+43.170+00.001+00.000'ABCED16'32'48'64'80'96'8'24'40'56'72'88'104'OYSTERDEAD SHELLCHERRYSTONEQUAHOGLITTLENECKQUOHOG SEEDLING (<1")-2.000
-
4
.
0
0
0
-3.000 -1.0000.0001.0002.0003.000-3.000
-3.0
0
0 -3.000-2.000-1.000-1.000-2.000-1.0000.0001.000-2.000-3
.
0
0
06.0007.0008.0008.000 7.0006.0007.0007.0007.0001+43.170+00.001+00.000+50.00PROPOSED16.75'x14'BOAT LIFTAND PIERX -3.96X -3.39X -2.33X -0.91EXISTING STAIRSTO BE REPLACEDEXISTING STAIRSTO BE REPLACEDACCESS ANDLIMIT OF WORKEXISTINGDWELLINGEXISTINGGARAGEEXISTINGPATIO-2.000EXISTINGSALT MARSHX -2.65X -3.1045 PRINCE RDMAP 29 PARCEL 89N/F ZORZI FAMILY LLCEXISTING BULKHEADAND TOCBNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLYP
-4.000
-
4
.
0
0
0
-3
.000-1.0000.0001.0002.0003.000-3.000-
3
.
0
0
0
-2.000
-1.000
-
4
.
0
0
06.0007.0008.0007.000
1+43.17
0+00.00
1+00.00129.4'170.2'R100.0'MOORING TYP.77.3'68.8'52.0'117.9'107.5'PROPOSED16.75'x14'BOAT LIFTAND PIER-2.000
-
5
.
0
0
0
KEY MAPNO SCALEP