HomeMy WebLinkAbout5031 212 Mid-Tech Dr Signed Memorandum with Exhibits Received 07.25.23TO:
FROM:
PETITION NO.:
HEARING DATE:
APPLICANTS:
PROPERTY:
ASSESSOR'S MAP:
LOT SIZE:
ZONING DISTRICT:
MEMORANDUM
�lll JUG 25 REC'D �J
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Zoning Board of Appeals
John W. Kenney, Esq.
5031
July 27, 2023
JDB 212 Mid -Tech Drive, LLC
186-212 Mid -Tech Drive, West Yarmouth, MA
Map 84, Parcel 12
60,024 Sq. Ft. ±
B-3/APD/R2\4DOD (Registered Marijuana Dispensary
Overlay District)
RELIEF REQUESTED: 1. Applicant is seeking a Special Permit pursuant to
Sections 104.4.1 and 104.4.2 of the Zoning Bylaw to allow
a condominium form of ownership for the proposed eleven
G 1) contractor bays project.
2. Applicant is seeking a Special Permit pursuant to Section
104.3.2.3 to raze and replace the existing non -conforming
structure located on the premises with a conforming
structure.
3. Applicant is seeking a Special Permit pursuant to Section
202.5 and Section 406.5 to allow for the use of the property
as a non -hazardous General building contractor's yard in
the Aquifer Protection District.
4. Applicant is seeking a Special Permit, or in the
alternative, a Variance, pursuant to Section 301.4.1 of the
Zoning Bylaw to waive the requirement that parking areas
be located at the side and/or rear of the principal structure.
5. Applicant is seeking a Special Permit, or in the
alternative, a Variance, pursuant to Section 301.4.4 of the
Zoning Bylaw to waive the requirement that existing trees
of at least 4" (four inch) caliper within prescribed buffers
be retained in parking areas for five (5) or more cars.
6. Applicant is seeking a Special Permit, or in the
alternative, a Variance, pursuant to Section 301.4.6 of the
Zoning Bylaw to waive the requirement that the lot contain
at least one (1) tree of 3" (three inch) caliper or larger per
eight (8) cars be located within the parking area and
dispersed throughout the parking area for parking lots for
twenty (20) or more cars.
7. Applicant is seeking a Special Permit, or in the
alternative, a Variance, pursuant to Section 301.4.9 of the
Zoning Bylaw to waive the requirement that all lots in the
B-3 Zoning District which shall contain a business use
retain existing trees of at least 4" (four inch) caliper within
prescribed buffers.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is located at 186-212 Mid -Tech Drive, West Yarmouth,
Massachusetts. The property is shown as Lots 37, 38 and 39 on Land Court Plan 37737-
D. It is shown as Parcel 12 on Town of Yarmouth Assessor's Map 84. A copy of Land
Court Plan 37737-D, Sheet 1 and a copy of the portion of Assessor's Map 84 showing
Parcel 12 are attached hereto as Exhibits 1 and 2 for your review.
The property is currently developed with a building containing 10,680 square feet
according to the Town of Yarmouth's Assessor's Records. The Cape Cod Five Cents
Savings Bank was the sole occupant of the building until the expiration of its lease in
2021. The bank used the building for office use and storage.
The Applicant, JDB 212 Mid -Tech Drive, LLC, Jeffrey D. Bilezikian, Manager, acquired
title to the property by deed dated June 21, 2019 and registered with the Barnstable
County Registry of Deeds District of the Land Court on June 24, 2019 as Document No.
1,372,857 as noted on Certificate of Title No. 219782. A copy of the Deed has been
submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals as part of the application for relief.
The subject properly is located in the B-3 Zoning District. It is also located in the Aquifer
Protection District. It has an on -site septic system and is served by municipal water. The
property is located in an area designated "Future Phases" for the installation of municipal
sewer. The property will be connected to the municipal sewer system when it becomes
available.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
The Applicant proposes to demolish the existing two-story structure containing 10,680
square feet and build a new building, containing 11,360 square feet. The building will
have a standing seem metal roof; insulated metal panel siding; and a 4-foot high concrete
wall perimeter. A condominium form of ownership is proposed.
The building is proposed to be divided into eleven (11) contractor bays. Each bay will
have a fenced storage area to the rear of the unit with an 8' x 12' concrete pad. The
fencing is proposed to be 6' high and consist of black coated chain -link fence with a gate.
ZONING BACKGROUND
The property is located in the B-3 Zoning District. The minimum lot size is 40,000 square
feet. Locus contains 60,024 square feet.
The proposed structure complies with the setback and height requirements of the B-3
Zoning District. The proposed use as General building contractor's yard (non -hazardous)
is an allowed use in the B-3 Zoning District as provided in Section 202.5 of the Bylaw,
but a Special Permit for the use is required due to the location of the property in the
Aquifer Protection Overlay District.
The Applicant applied for, and received, a Stormwater Management Permit from the
Town of Yarmouth Conservation Commission.
SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITIONS AND ARGUMENT
Section 103.2 of the Zoning Bylaw authorizes the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant
Special Permits. ,Section 103.2.2 authorizes you to grant a Special Permit if you find that
the Applicant has demonstrated that no undue nuisance, hazard or congestion will be
created and that there will be no substantial harm to the established or future character of
the neighborhood or town.
Following is an itemization of the Special Permits requested by the Applicant and an
explanation as to how the project meets the criteria for granting each requested Special
Permit:
1. Condominium Form of Ownership — Section 104.4 of the Zoning Bylaw
addresses "Condominium Conversion." Section 104.4.1 sets forth specific
requirements when "Any legally existing conforming or nonconforming structure
or use" is converted to a condominium form of ownership.
Section 104.4.2 allows for a Special Permit to "be issued for an entire subdivision
based upon a typical condominium unit and plot plan...."
Since Section 104.4.1 and 104.4.2 are both contained within Section 104.4
Condominium Conversion, and there is no separate criteria for granting a Special
Permit set forth in Section 104.4.2, these sections are to be read together and
apply only to the conversion of a structure or use to a condominium form of
ownership.
If the Zoning Board of Appeals is of the opinion that a Special Permit is required
for the proposed condominium form of ownership for this project, the Applicant's
proposal meets the requirements for granting the Special Permit. The existing
structure has been used as office and storage space. The new structure is proposed
to be used as General building contractor yard condominium bays. The bays will
serve as office and storage for the individual unit owners, hence no change in use.
The "declaration of condominium document(s)" consist of Master Deed which
defines the units; common areas; exclusive use areas; and allowed uses of the
units. The Declaration of Trust would consist of each unit owner and would be
managed by unit owners serving as "trustees". The trustees are empowered to
assess association fees to be paid by each unit owner to cover the costs of
maintaining and repairing common areas including utility/water lines and the on -
site septic system.
2. Raze and Replace Existing Building — Section 104.3.2.3 allows for a lawfully
pre-existing, non -conforming structure to be razed and replaced by Special Permit
if the Board of Appeals determines that the new structure either "conforms to the
current dimension requirements ... or does not increase the existing non-
conforming nature of the structure ..." The proposed new structure conforms to
the current dimensional requirements of the Bylaw.
3. Use of PronertK as Non -Hazardous General Building Contractor's Yard -
Section 202.5 of the Bylaws allows for the use of property in the B3 Zoning
District as non -hazardous General building contractor's yard. However, since the
property is also located within the Aquifer Protection Overlay District (Section
406 of the Bylaw), a Special Permit is required. Section 406.5 sets forth the
Special Permit requirements.
The Applicant has appeared before the Site Plan Review Team twice. The
Applicant cannot identify a complete list of, and quantities of potentially toxic or
hazardous materials (with Materials Safety Date Sheets [MSDS]) at this time
since there are no known users of the units. However, the Site Plan Review
process resulted in several conditions, which the Applicant has agreed to, which
will insure compliance with the Bylaw requirements for issuing the Special
Permit.
At Site Plan Review, the Building Inspector informed the Applicant that an
Occupancy Permit for the entire building will not be issued. Instead each
individual unit will be issued a Certificate of Occupancy. Any change in use, or
ownership, will require a new Certificate of Occupancy. The application for
occupancy shall be reviewed by the Building Department, the Yarmouth Fire
Department, and the Yarmouth Board of Health (see Site Plan Review Comment
Sheet Date: August 16, 2022 attached hereto as Exhibit 3).
The Health Department had extensive comments on the project plan which have
all been incorporated into the plans to bring them into compliance with the design
and operational requirements of the Bylaw. Further, the Health Department
requires any prospective occupant (tenant or owner) first consult with the Health
Department for approval of their proposed use and to obtain any required licenses
or permits. Outdoor storage of materials require Health Department review and
approval.
The conditions and protocols set forth by the Building, Health and Fire
Departments are designed to insure compliance with the intent of the Bylaw and
its specific criteria.
The Grading, Draining, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C4.0) show the
safeguards to protect against toxic or hazardous materials discharges or spills. All
toxic and hazardous waste material spills inside the building will be contained via
interior floor drains which drain to an industrial wastewater holding tank with
secondary containment and alarm system.
All runoff from imperious surfaces shall be recharged on -site in bio-swales
covered with vegetation for surface infiltration. The proposed design has received
a Stormwater Management Permit from the Yarmouth Conservation Commission.
The proposed project will result in a reduced design flow and reduced nitrogen
load from the existing use of the property. The on -site waste disposal and other
on -site operations will not violate federal or state standards for drinking water at
the downgradient property boundary.
The property is located in an area designated "Future Phases" of the plan for
installation of the Town of Yarmouth municipal sewer system. When available,
the property will connect to the system.
4. Waiver re: Location of Parking Areas — Section 301.4.1 of the Bylaw requires
parking areas to be located at the side and/or rear of a principal structure. The
Applicant is proposing to put the parking area in front of the building. Placing the
building to the rear of the lot and the parking area in front of the building allows
for better emergency vehicle access and general vehicular circulation on -site. If
the building were to be moved forward and the parking to the backside of the lot,
the rear of the building would have to face Mid -Tech Drive. Further, this would
create an unsafe condition. If emergency vehicles had to access the site in the case
of a fire, there would be the potential for the vehicle to be trapped. Finally, the
proposed parking for the new building is in a similar location to the parking area
for the existing building, minimizing any harm to the established or future
character of the neighborhood or town.
5. Waiver of Requirement to Retain Existing Trees — Section 301.4.4 of the
Bylaw requires that for parking areas for five (5) or more cars existing trees of at
least 4" (four inch) caliper be retained. The Applicant is proposing to remove
trees from the buffer area along Mid -Tech Drive, some of which are at least 4"
caliper. The trees are being removed to install drainage swales for pre-treatment
of on -site runoff. The drainage swales require a 3:1 slope. After the swales are
constructed, the area will be relandscaped with 22 trees and shrub groupings per
the Landscape Plan submitted, which will provide a more enhanced buffer than
currently exists.
Removal of the trees was approved by the Site Plan Review Committee due to
"sound landscape design reasons" to allow for proper construction of the bio-
swales.
6. Waive Requirement For In -Lot Trees — Section 301.4.6 of the Bylaw requires
parking lots for twenty (20) or more cars contain at least one (1) tree of 3" (three
inch) caliper or larger per eight (8) cars, to be located in the parking area. The
Applicant is proposing a parking area for 33 cars. Pursuant to the provisions of
the Bylaw, 4.1 trees are required (33 _ 8 = 4.1). The Applicant is proposing five
(5) trees, but the Site Plan Review Team determined the trees were not dispersed
throughout the parking area and that a Special Permit (or Variance) was required.
The Applicant has located the five in -lot trees within the parking area, but in
locations so as not to interfere with emergency vehicle access or general vehicle
circulation (see Proposed Landscape Planting Plan submitted with Application).
The location of the trees in the parking area avoids creating a hazardous condition
or on -site congestion.
7. Waive Re uirement to Maintain Existing 4" four inch Cali er Trees —
Section 301.4,9 requires all lots in the B3 Zoning District retain existing trees of
at least 4" caliper with prescribed buffers. As stated above in #5, the Applicant is
proposing to remove some trees of at least 4" caliper in the buffer area along Mid -
Tech Drive to create drainage swales. After construction of the drainage swales,
the buffer will be re -vegetated as per the Landscape Plan submitted. The re -
vegetated buffer will provide an enhanced buffer superior to existing conditions.
In summary, the property is located toward the end of Mid -Tech Drive, a road lined
with similar style buildings and industrial/commercial uses. The project has been
thoughtfully designed to allow for safe emergency vehicle access and general
vehicular access. If approved, the project will result in enhanced buffer protection
along the frontage on Mid -Tech Drive as well as better on -site treatment of runoff
from impervious surfaces bringing the location into compliance with the Aquifer
Protection District zoning regulations. No undue nuisance, hazard, or congestion
would be created. There would be no substantial harm to the established or future
character of the neighborhood or town.
VARIANCE CRITERIA AND ARGUMENT
Section 102.2.2 of the Bylaw authorizes the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant a variance
if you find all of the following criteria are met:
1. literal enforcement of the provisions of this Bylaw would involve a substantial
hardship financial or otherwise, to the petitioner or appellant.
2. The hardship is owing to circumstances relating to the soil conditions, shape or
topography of such land or structures and especially affecting such land or
structures, but not affecting generally the zoning district in which it is located.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without either: substantial detriment to the public
good; or nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of this
Bylaw.
If the Board determines that Variances are the appropriate form of relief instead of
,Special Permits for items numbered 4, S, 6, and 7 above, the proposed project meets the
criteria for granting the Variances.
As described in item number 4 above, the Applicant is requesting a waiver of the
requirement that the parking area be located to the side or rear of the building.
Items number 5 and 6 above request relief from the requirement to retain trees of 4"
caliper and 3" caliper respectively.
The final waiver requested is described in number 7 above. This waiver relates to the
location of tees in the parking area.
A literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw would involve a substantial
hardship to the Applicant. If the Applicant were to be required to move the building to
the front of the lot to put the parking to the rear of the building, fire and emergency
vehicle access would be compromised. The backside of the building, with outdoor
storage areas, would front on Mid -Tech Drive. There would be no economically feasible
location for the on -site bio-swales to treat runoff from impervious surfaces as required by
the Aquifer Protection District regulation.
The removal of buffer trees within the landscape buffer area along Mid -Tech Drive is
necessary for the creation of the bio-swales which are required by the Aquifer Protection
District regulations. Given the proposed use which drives the site design, there is no other
area that allows for the required 3:1 slope for the bio-swales. Without the removal of the
trees, the bio-swales cannot be constructed, and the project could not go forward.
The hardship for each requested variance relates to the shape and topography of the lot.
The property consists of three separate lots which have been combined. The resulting lot
is a long, narrow, rectangular shaped lot.
Due to the narrowness of the lot, there is insufficient room to build the building at the
front of the lot and put the parking in the rear. The proposed use is for nonhazardous
general contractor bays. It is anticipated that many of the occupants will have trucks
towing trailers. They will need room to maneuver. The front of the building would have
to face the back of the lot. This would put most of the impervious surface to the rear of
the lot. The only economically feasible place to install the required bio-swales is at the
front of the lot.
The proposed use drives the site design. As a result of the site design, the only place the
required 3:1 slope for the bio-swales exists is at the front of the lot along Mid -Tech
Drive. To properly install the bio-swales, trees need to be removed. Without the bio-
swales, the project cannot meet the Aquifer Protection District standards and could not be
constructed.
The in -lot trees have been located in areas within the parking area, but in locations so
they do not interfere with either emergency vehicle access or general vehicular
circulation. Placing the in -lot trees within islands throughout the parking area would
create problems for on -site vehicular circulation given the nature of the proposed use.
The narrowness of the lot does not allow for locating the in -lot trees in that manner.
Desirable relief can be granted without either substantial detriment to the public good or
nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw.
The property is located towards the end of Mid -Tech Drive, an isolated, dead-end road.
The road is lined with similar style buildings and industrial/commercial uses. The
existing parking lot abuts Mid -Tech Drive. Granting the requested Variances will result
in an enhanced buffer zone along Mid -Tech Drive; proper on -site treatment of water
runoff from impervious surfaces as required by the Aquifer Protection District; and safer,
less congested traffic circulation on -site.
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, I submit to this Board that the Applicant meets the requirements
for the Special Permits and/or Variances requested. We ask that you vote in favor of the
relief requested.
Respectfully submitted,
Jo4 W. Kenney / % l
Attorney for Jeffrey D`Bilezikian, Manager
JDB 212 Mid -Tech Drive, LLC
1550 Falmouth Road, Suite 12
Centerville, MA 02632
508-771-9300
EXHIBIT 3
Formal Review
SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
Date: August 16, 2022 Map: 84 Lot: 12
Applicant: JDB 212 Mid -Tech, LLC
Location: 186- 212 Mid -Tech Drive, West Yarmouth Zone: B-3/APD
Persons Present:
Mark Grylls
Atty. John Kenney
Carl Lawson
Kurt Raber
De . Kevin Huck
John Lavelle
Lt. Matt Bearse
Bruce Murphy
Laurie Ruszala
Project -Summary
Proposed 11,360 sf contractor bay building with 11 units, paved parking lot with 33 spaces, new stormwater management
system, septic system, landscaping, lighting, and associated grading and utilities.
Comments
Ii +13/ Building: Project is located in zoning district B-3 and the APD overlay district.
4V Disturbance area is calculated, and the applicant must file an application For a stormwater Management Permit with the
Yarmouth Conservation Commission.
The raise and replace of the building appears to meet the setback requirements. The proposed parking is located in from
of the building relief from the ZBA will be required for parking location per Section 301.2. There are no in lot trees
indicated on the plan as required per section 301.4.6, Sheet C4.0 indicates that swales will be located in the front buffer
area as required per section 301.4.4. Planting schedule on page L4 indicates trees / plantings will be in the drainage
swale. I have questions regarding the effectiveness of the swale over time as these plantings mature. Is there an
alternative to the Swale locations? Lighting plan appears adequate; however, plan does not provide a detail of the lighting
fixtures to be used. It must be noted that per section 301.4.10, all lighting shall be directed onsite only, with no undue
glare affecting adjoining properties. Please be sure that all lighting to include building and site faces the ground
There are no potential tenants / occupants identified at this time. All occupants will be required to obtain a Certificate of
Occupancy from the Building Dept. prior to occupancy. The application for all occupancies shall be reviewed by Building,
YFD, and Health.
All construction to comply with all applicable sections of TOY Zoning Bylaws, 780 CMR and appendant codes.
Planning: The project is located near the end of Mid -Tech Drive (a dead-end road) with similar style uses and buildings
in the area.
1. With parking located mostly in front of the building and a general utilitarian building, front buffers are an important
design element. The proposed project includes the elimination of at least 17 larger buffer trees along Mid -Tech
Drive, mainly to install the drainage swales (please note the landscape plan shows about 5 more existing trees
being removed than the civil plans which should be clarified.) The Landscape plan does show the front being
relandscaped with trees and some shrub groups (trees should be native species, a minimum of 3" caliper spaced
every 20'). Although the shrub groupings may be helpful in screening the parking in the front, longitudinal utilities
should not be placed within the required front buffers as it necessitates the removal of larger established existing
trees, contrary to Sections 301.4.4 & 301.4.9.
2. Any buffer plantings required by the Bylaw should all be located on the subject property. The Landscape Plan
(included with the architectural plans) shows some proposed plantings within the road right-of-way.
3. In -lot trees need to be dispersed throughout the paved surface per Section 301A.6. Trees along the outside
perimeter of the parking area are not considered in -lot trees,
4. Recommend fencing be black coated vinyl rather than galvanized chain link.
5. Project has more than one acre of land disturbance and a Stormwater Management Permit is required through the
Conservation Commission.
Conservation:
Design Review: Refer to the attached August 2, 2022 Design Review Comment Sheet
Engineering:
• Engineering defers detailed stormwater review for the Stormwater Management Permit as noted
previously.
• Suggest relocating bioswales away from landscaping buffers.
• Specify which pavement detail will be used for pavement areas.
• Clean, inspect and repair as necessary existing drainage to be repurposed towards the rear of the
parking lot. It appears it may have been installed in 2016. Please confirm.
• File road opening permit at DPW for curb cut modifications. Provide loam & seed for driveway to be
abandoned.
Fire: MGL 148 Section 26G: Automatic sprinkler s} steins required for buildings and structw•es
yoTotaling more than 7,500 gross square feet.
Compliance with the following: 527 CMR 1 Chapter 16 "Safeguarding Construction,
Alteration, and Demolition Operations." 780 CMR Chapter 33, NFPA 24. Per 527 CMR
J� k 1 16.1.2 u A fire protection plan shall be established and submitted" This plan shall
include the following: 16.3.1 Fire safety program, 16.3.2 Owners designated fire
prevention program manager, 16.3.4.1 A suitable location at the site shall be designated
as a command post and provided with plans, emergency information, keys,
communications and equipment as needed. Number of hydrants on site should be
based on fire flow calculations 527 CMR 1.18.5.and annex E table E.3. Evaluation of
Emergency responder radio coverage based on 780 CMR 915.1 and 527CMR 1.Fire
Protection systems to be maintained by condo association.
Health:
All prospective tenants mast consult with the Health Dept. for approval of their proposed use
f and to obtain any required licenses or permits before renting and occupying units. Any use or
storage of toxic or hazardous materials requires prior Health Dept. approval. Toxic or
hazardous materials storage in excess of 10 gallons requires a Board of Health license. Toxic
or hazardous materials storage in excess of 20 gallons requires a Board of Health license and
zoning relief from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Such relief is not guaranteed. All toxic and
hazardous materials storage requires 150% volume secondary containment in addition to other
requirements.
All outdoor storage of materials including, but not limited to those used in landscaping, require
Health Dept. review and approval.
Vehicle washing operations are not allowed onsite either inside or outside of any building
Regarding engineered plan Sheet Title: Grading and Drainage Plan; Sheet No. C4.0, dated
December 10, 2021, under Operation and Maintenance Plan note 8 A, the note should be
revised to indicate vehicle washing is not allowed onsite either inside or outside of any
building.
Regarding engineered plan Sheet Title: Septic Profile and Details Plan; Sheet No. C5.1, dated
December 10, 2021:
(1) The notes next to the indicated holding tank control panel should be revised to include
mention of the alarm and indicator lights for the leak detection system.
(2) Under Industrial Wastewater Holding Tank Design Notes, the sizing calculation needs to be
revised to include the unit of time for the calculation and compare the result of the calculation
to the size of the holding tank.
(3) Under Tank Note 1 310 CMR 18 should be revised to 314 CMR 18 Industrial Wastewater
Holding Tank and Container Construction, Operation and Record Keeping Requirements.
(4) The primary holding tank and secondary containment tank must be waterproofed and noted
as such on Sheet C5.1 as required by 314 CMR 18.
(5) All refences to the 2500-gallon secondary containment tank must indicate H-20
construction.
(6) Inner and outer holding tank covers must be in alignment with each other as indicated on
plan.
(7) Inner Folding tank cover must have cover indicated over inlet.
(8) The 75% level high water indicator float must have the vertical distance measurement from
the bottom of the tank indicated.
(9) Indicate the height from the bottom of the tank of the leak detection float.
(10) Sign reading "NON-HAZRDOUS INDUSTRIAL WASTE WATER" must be present on
building in location adjacent to holding tank and indicated on plan.
(11) How will the holding tank alarm be monitored since it is only in one unit?
Is the floor pitch to the floor drains indicated on the foundation plan?
The plans make two references to a 1000-gallon holding tank and one reference to a 1500-
gallon holding tank as listed below.
Sheet Title: Utilities Plan, Sheet No. C5.0, dated December 10, 2021 indicates "1000 gallon
dual containment industrial wastewater holding tank."
Sheet Title: Septic Profile and Details Plan; Sheet No. C5.1, dated December 10, 2021 under
Industrial Wastewater Holding Tank Design Notes states "(1) 1000 gallon precast tank inside
of 2500 gallon precast concrete tank."
Sheet Title: Septic Profile and Details Plan; Sheet No. C5.1, dated December 10, 2021 the
note next to indicated tank states "Dual Containment Tank Shall Consist of H-20 1500 Gallon
Monolithic Precast Concrete Primary Holding Tank..."
Please indicate in all three places the correct size of the holding tank.
'The design engineer must (1) complete the DEP holding tank compliance certification form and
provide a copy to the Health Dept. and (2) submit a holding tank certification letter to the
Health Dept.
Water:
lease show the exiting 12-inch water main on the utility plan as it is close to your work. In addition, please note that the
re service for 211 Mid Tech is back tapped on the 12-inch main, therefore is closer to the proposed drainage basin than
would be expected.
Water service installation should be installed by an Approved Contractor in accordance with the Yarmouth Water
Materials and Installation Standards.
Read & Received by Applicant(s)
SDBD7v2SION PLAN Ol
LAND IN YAitMCU7Cti
Low & Weller Inc., Surveyors
August 29, 1984
EXHIBIT 1
R0,60rl h! Loring
a
Joshua G. Thacker
lbdivision of Lot 2
town on Plai7 3:7737A Sh. 2
.led with Cert. o Title No
22
°gistry District of Barnstable�C
County
fe certificates of title
'Own hereon may be Issued for land
.own
the Court. �ois.2•o. •>hru•�2
.................
7
sHeE 7 / o
a _
a Sea/e 100 (eaJ�o an ukh
ii 56,gn33'5��V� o + i
Abutters are shown Ba
on original decree plan
Copy of parr of plan
Nlodln
LAND REGISTRATION OFFICE
✓Aw r, 1,9se
Scala or this plan /oo feat to an Inch
Louts A. mooro, EngineortorCu�rrt,
EXHIBIT 2
O
1 _ '
I
I
I
� I
wl
�I
�i
i
I � u
I u
.n
} 586
I y
212 sAtio �srcY1� ;
� U 1
I cq sa m�
I
I o m
I U y a
LL d
Ig ry p o a
a w �
I �
1 ¢ �
I
I ^
I
i zo
1 5w
i I �JLL y.Q
J w �
�3
J————————————————————— L—EBOfd
--- ----------Q— —
1--------------- z'A
I o 0
I D F
K
ea
�e
v
kc E