HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPR 12622 Formal Review
SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
Date: December 6, 2022 Map: 37 Parcel: 147.1
Applicant: SUNH LLC (Sunbird)
Location: 216 Route 28 Zone: B2/HMOD1
Persons Present:
Mark Grylls Wagner Quintanilha - Mgr
Kathy Williams Amanda Lima
Lt. Matt Bearse Phil Renaud
Laurie Ruszala
Brittany DiRienzo
Project Summary
Sport Court, Modify parking layout.
Comments
Buildinq6
Court would be considered an ancillary use to the existing hotel. Lot coverage calcs are not provided. Table 203.5 allows
for 25% building coverage. Footnote P allows up to 70% impervious lot coverage when an approved recharge system for
stormwater is provided. Recommend increased buffer as court directly abuts a residence. If lighting is provided, a lighting
plan will be required to prove compliance with section 301.4.10.
,:-community Development and Planning:
1. Hours of Use & Lighting: To be respectful of the noise associated with the proposed sports court so close
to residential abutters, the hours of use should be limited, and no night-time play should be allowed, so
lighting is not needed.
2. Circulation & Access: The circulation shown is now one-way between the two properties (216 & 226
Route 28). Is this an issue with separate ownership in the future?
3. Landscaping: Provide a Landscape Plan
a. Buffer Trees (min. 3" caliper): Provide front buffer tree on west side of entrance and also along the
east side if curb cut is being reduced as shown. Supplement buffer trees around sports court as
needed to fully screen from residential abutters. Additional buffer trees should be included along the
western property line in general as there are only small shrubs now.
b. In-Lot Trees (min. 3" caliper): Reorganization of the parking with the addition of a new landscaped
island is a benefit and in-lot trees can now be provided within the newly created island. Show
dimension of revised parking spaces.
Conservation:
The total area of disturbance is required to be calculated to determine if a stormwater management permit will be
required.
Design Review: Not present. Design Review is necessary for this project, especially with the proposed port cochere
which will need architectural plans.
Engineering:
• Current disturbance appears to yield about 0.15 acre.
• No drainage improvements proposed for this area. Consideration should be evaluated.
• Reflect existing drainage on the drawing.
Fire: Fire Department access shall be to 527 CMR 1 Ch. 18 specifically but not limited to Fire requires a sweep
test analysis per 18.1.1.4 curb cuts per 18.2.3.4.6.3 Access to building needs to conform to 18.2.3.2.2 Fire
apparatus cannot travel in opposing lane as a fire lane per 18.2.3.4.8 Recommend adding sprinkler system to
building per NFPA 13, to gain some relief from code.
ftHealth: No comments.
,)\,Water: No comments.
Read & Received by Applicant(s)
c
e t