HomeMy WebLinkAboutFema Final Cost 72622 TOWN F Y RMOL TH
1146 Route 4 Louth, MA 02664
RECEIVED 508-398-2231 e ` 1261 ` 508-398-0836
Office of the Bui1 .in o missioner
JUL 2 6 2022
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
FINAL COST AFFIDVIT FOR WORK IN FEMA FLOOD ZONE
To the Building Commissioner,
In accordance with 780 CMR Section 109 of the Massachusetts State Building Code, the total estimated cost of
construction, including all related costs* of the building at /9 Y ',tJC ✓e
and constructed,reconstructed, altered,repaired, or extended under building permit no. })--cagy 6O
amounts to $ 37/ p S0 ,
I, ct (65vA ,being referred to as the owner/agent identified below,do solemnly
swear that the statements made herein are strictly true, correct and made in good faith
*Related construction costs include all work done with or concurrently with the work contemplated by the building
permit including construction, reconstruction, repairs, demolition, HVAC work, etc. Furnishings and portable
equipment are not part of the total construction costs.
Signature of o er/agent
OS,/ y/ Z�
No i ign My Commission Expires
toi wn i !(U"M/ R CHATTR
Notary Seal:
• •••
TARGET INSPECTIONS
SUM ARY OF TOTAL DUCT LEAKAGE TESTING
RESULTS FOR:
Nunzio Napolitano
Site Located at:
197 Pine Grove Road
South Yarmouth, MA
Project Number: 108E
Duct Test
Report Version: 1.0
Target Inspections
Steven Grevelis
P.O. Box 444
West Dennis, MA 02670
Phone: (888) 280-2108
Email: steve@targetinspections.com
www.targetinspections.com
Certified HERS Rater(RIN—4958795),
BBRS Approved Third Party Tester(Documents
Available on Request), & Microbial Professional
Enclosures:
- Summary of Results
- Calibration Data
PASS
Based on testing of the total duct systems,the observed total duct leakage at the time of
testing of the system was at or below the allowable limit(4 dm per 100 sq ft)as set forth in
IECC 2018 with tested results of 1.39 cfm per 100 sq ft.
Target inspections Summary o Testing Results Copyright 2010/2011
Disclaimer Although we seek tc provide the w most accurate rpof possible we cannot guarantee any findings may or may net changed din'onwronmental conditions or contractor doctsionslactions thatia7:*el beyond our control Target Inspections is not responsible for nom,ements as a resell<
of our inspection
Page 1 of 5
TARGET INSPECTIONS
Testing Conditions
May 4th, 2022
Wind — Calm 0 MPH
Weather—Cloudy
Outdoor Temperature—56° F
Outdoor Relative Humidity—90%
Barometric Pressure—29.83`r
Target Inspections Summary of Testing Results Copyright 2010/2011
Disclaimer.Although we seek to provide the most accurate Information possible we cannot guarantee any findings may or may not be changed due to
environmental conditions or contractor decisions/actions that are beyond our control. Target Inspections is not responsible for improvements as a resell
of our inspection.
Page 2 of 5
Total Duct Leakage Test TAR T!N5PINSPECT ws
Test Date: 05/04/2022
Technician:Steven Grevelis
Test File: 108E Heat Cool_197 Pine Grove Rd_S. Yarmouth Duct
Building Address: 197 Pine Grove Road
South Yarmouth, MA
Equipment Used
Retrotec—DU-200 Duct Blaster w/ DM32 Manometer
Serial Numbers: FT9010674/404468
DM32 Factory Calibration Date: 10-23-2020
DM32 Next Factory Calibration Date by: 10-23-2025
Field Calibration of DU-200 Performed; 03-23-2022
Tubing Integrity Testing Performed on Site
The home has 1 system outside of conditioned space that was tested:
Test Results
In accordance with IECC 2018 the maximum allowable total duct leakage is 4 cfm per 100 sq ft
at+/- 25 pa in the rough or final stage. Currently MA Stretch Code Towns must meet the same
requirements.
Whole House square footage of conditioned space is 2090 square feet:
- Maximum allowable leakage of 4 cfm per 100 sq ft=83.60 cfm: (4 cfm x 2090 sq ft/100
sq ft=83.60 cfm)
System#1—Servicing the entire conditioned space-
- Tested total duct leakage was 29.06 cfm @-25 pa
Total duct leakage was 29.06 cfm = 1.39 cfm per 100 sq ft
cfm=cubic feet per minute pa=pascals sq ft=square feet
Target Inspections Summary of Testing Results Copyright 20 1 0120 1 1
Disciaimer-Although we seek to provide the most accurate information possible we cannot guarantee any findings may or may not be changed due to
environmental conditions or contractor demons/actions that are beyond our control Target Inspections is not responsible for improvements as a result
of our inspection.
Page 3 of 5
�
CoM~.usion
TARGET INSPECTIONS
Based on testing of the total duct systems,
t�stin of the 8tDrbelow th2qbse/«gdtVta|duct/eakage at the ti of
|E[CZO18vvith't '-'� '~su1� VftheaUowab|e |imhs /4cfn� perIO0sq #je� nme'�hin
1���c�nl ��r / --'~ results 1'3gcfn�per1OUm�ft Th` tmta|�uct|e - secno
�~�sq `c - � eak��evvgo�B����fn�=
The system aS installed meets the recommended guidelines and no further sealing is »equired
Note l: Square footage provided by Nunzio Napo/itano. '
-
29.06
PHOTO SUMMARY � PHOTO SUMMARY
Setup nf the tested system. Manometer reading nf the tested system.
' ouny�htumumn 1
Disclaimer: guaranteeany findings may or may not»°changed due*
environmental conditions or----r-------n-that are beyond our Control. Target~~~~~~^ ~not responsible for improvements°"a="uit
of our inspection
Page 4ofS
'--
TARGET INSPECTIONS
�
This inspection report is solely based on the conditions within the defined area at the time of inspection
only and makes no express or implied warrant or guarantee as to future changes in condition or
conditions outside of the described job scope.
Sincerely,
! Steven G[eVe|'
'
Certified HERS Rater mIN—uysx7ysL
| m Certified Microbial Professional
Target Inspections
|
uou°me,Afthough we seek to provide Summary of Tasting Results Copyright umm2n 1
the Most accurate e"=�"m"ww"m�" m�n*m*m»�u�"�^�������—'—~~~~~"�"�' w°�"� "mu°wam=dme�
�m"��� -- ---~~~ Target'nsPectoonsw not respon�.for�rnprovemenm°"nrosuil