Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
9 Homer Ave packet
1 �'' ti �` 1 � ,, ` �t ,�� f � � s, ,� � �� ,� �- �" � �� ��� �� � t�C �� � % ` t 1 � `t J �r. �., i 1 �`� �' 1 i r _ 1 l 1 ,�,�� ` � �. t \ �� � ��ac'�� ,� � � � • � � � d �� � �` ` � ` � a � � � �� o� � � _. �� � �.d E , .� �� � o �� .. .� ..� �:. �� � � � � �: �'k�,. +� � +� � � �, y,.� .Y �. � ' Q T - � p,aenu _ ] CD Lo E oNo a w ° r T o C C� o o rn 0 o 71 rrO E o QOL Ir 0- U _O gE+ O S�1t J r cn N + Q CJ7 0_ E^ m _.1 Sts egt O �_ Q) 0) 00 L 00 T N W Pmna 5tseet OsmsbY to _d -O d p (D — Q Q Q p U o a U w -U Q Cn W p c Q) m U II O z V a) x O N c tD 5� rn O 0 > Q 0 Q � 7 C� O O N - Ln v Q D 7 U O .0 O 7 Ln 6 v 4 OOD QJ Q c2 00 LO nnL L D a O p N o o V)� ?tea Q r v a= v) c V) U a- O" c o oLS C m a a"� .00' O 0'OO :.. moo_ x wn� a iT wO L U N N v `n w a usL O L ° D R n a Q .L U M O r) O O Q � N K7D-a 4� - 61 61 ��a� m ue - � O t 1 4 CP o - yy� /.V]p 4 N .V)H /'i N 1 'p D tY 00n t C�� �� 5l " 1 i � n m o Ql , om a� L }t 5 y i p �� \ '1 1 •Dy 5 V 4 VV i5 i 2231 1 � 51V a yy J S m 4 5 �d y 5y 4 c�j � 12O 4 ' •� 1 m N N ' S Lo O NCL o Mtn z w r 0- 20 L� _ � .?J a CO _ . 3 V5 m 41 -9 (!) O Q as 0 uj , � d m N -o ' He 9 00 `N O Q x 83 °� J o ry C!1 N sn z vi o r) 0 .23q?3 "Woo [O N ti` N41 aNUHD o KV Z 04 � ~ mr 2 �w000 rn c� z n o l0 �OrIZ - �¢w D7�m?� o '� gwaora g o r•l d z 3zw v)¢o �¢Q LO N V1D�zww w a � O FQr OJ 7 a ��YOu Z. P zoz�.J 20=.rOs tr�zw� r �oi"�po oozwW wz Z �760�Q Greene, Karen From: Sarah Korjeff <skorjeff@capecodcommission.org> Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 5:48 PM To: Greene, Karen Cc: Sherman, Lisa Subject: Re: Question on Ntl Reg District Attention! This email originates outside of the organization. Do not open attachments or click links unless you arc sure this email is from a known sender and you know the content is safe. Call the sender to verify if unsure. Otherwise delete this email. Hi Karen, New construction on a National Register property would only trigger Cape Cod Commission/Yarmouth Historical Commission review if it involves demolition OR if the new construction somehow dominates the historic property. For more detailed examples, see page 9 of our historic referral guidelines for what qualifies as a "substantial alteration" triggering Cape Cod Commission review. Referring Historic Properties to the Cape Cod Commission for Review As always, any time you have a question, feel free to share the plans with me and I can provide an informal opinion. Welcome Lisa! The Cape Cod Commission regulations are unique and seem tricky at first, so I'd be happy to walk you through them and answer questions when you're ready. Sincerely, Sarah Sarah Korjeff Historic Preservation Specialist/Planner Cape Cod Commission 3225 Main Street/P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 508-362-3828 (front desk) 508-744-1215 (direct) From: Greene, Karen <KGreene@yarmouth.ma.us> Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 12:30 PM To: Sarah Korjeff <skorjeff@capecodcommission.org> Cc: Sherman, Lisa <LSherman@yarmouth.ma.us> Subject: Question on Ntl Reg District CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Sarah 1 Question on a property located at 9 Homer Ave in our Bass River Ntl Register District —the owners are proposing to erect anew structure on the property. No demolition involved. -this would be completely new. Is there any purview for our YHO Would you let me know? Thanks, Karen Karen M. Greene, Director of Community Development Town of Yarmouth k reene armouth.ma.us 508-398-2231 x1278 cn a m � co { O O O O U p �j Cp N N rn -- N OOi N O QI O7 N W m (a > m cli 0) _O m I d N 1- ti U U -p N N ONm h J D a a) C C 00 2 . + VI] w O .N a 0) O N 7 aaa CON A y N �N5 c N O n0) rls `! aUmm m(No o b N O N } O N m U 2 2 22 C 0 0 FlJ N O O 7 a O p V N n To U C�00000 y r N O 0 LO O 7 N � Ld ra r Q �ii r� f° n q c un N Q .y w ,� 6] a) 7 CJ 16 LL of m Ca m m � ~ O O U J ONE Or _ N R U m >mIL W)N CO Qp 7 p 00 �i w 3 V Y7 22S m C6 Vt04 n U OO r 16 7 [� >>' d d J'Y06000f7�� j m m h CN Q m U CO V_ M_ _M } N X J c' m �N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q N NN NN m O O .� (6 f Q Q ❑ rONNNN V Q} � 00 O N O7 m `Q p_ `o. Q C N TOO NO n000 O F- y u7 N N v' Q ❑. Q Q. a O M Q Q Q Q F- �! O Z UQ� N N V N Wil Q W m W J � oa o (U 00 0 0 = :j0 a0 U ,co r c ""LL Of NZZ JW W -o pQJ N (b E �Q LU Q cncn CD N E z>a p u07� vv �W } 0 N U 590Ft d rr 0 Q o Q W UU) LI-W Z -d LLTjr� oa r aOZ00LL 0000 mZ �z �0 a @ W¢ O W O Z o o 0 0 0 o r 0000 arnrna� o0 3 ror ti co ao N E o o o Lo m E p 2 O N U ci F R Z c L) UJ Z 0 m ❑ O o x N o co co m N Q O d v c H FF- U W W � p ----- O 2 00 �' N _ J 0 0 00 00 00 00 0 0 C. 7 m ii CL S 77077 uvi Gl } M o Q o0 ~ p 0 U) a- N N O O U m d 0 0 0 0 0 0 � Z ❑ 5 p N M Cc::)) 2 N N N N N 11 p N U M 0 JU 0 CD O Q1 N1 O O x h ~ Q Q 7 U N N N _ Z y C14 CO U LL O m c TO U Cln 0 00 0 Op T x m 0 0 0 0 0 0 U7 } I LL o Q Z �0o0oo(n LL Q LL n O CL O ONON C O E �' E O fh N- LO ro 7 fD Oa0 O M H m a a a a Q r a CD c O 47 coO❑ o (OD I yr QZrN V1 J O C] v v N rn W W MCNC 7 V ❑_ W N r L m MMNNr N 7 ZW O p HzU O F F- Z O m C 7 — a�iwga- N N o o Umar� C7 E m Z LL LX a� ❑ a'�a Qt N U) m J a 'O a w .�- ❑ � cs CC)'� Z 0 N is o 0 p y o N ❑ W F.. CJJdfn 2� F- z Z r C7 0 ���oornrn _ n U� U� F Q ❑ �ooaawrn ❑ N N N N r r Q WW c_n W 2 �Q pp W J a mC: —CN 04 ❑ J J (D0 W �Z �0.' Q W 0 EN N Nrr0 2 U 2—U QQ UAW Q O 2 � — Ph N— a aoarc CO Cn a_ W 0 UU �U .mac co W ad 0 CD 0 Z Q Q 0M: a z o � OF a❑ [Y } = 2 0 o0 (? F WWOUOU a U W Eo CN y O O 1J a O W 2 W W W W al2 Z Z mo o corn 7 W 2 2 O W W W� 0 } W O rN ate, m ❑ U rn fA ❑YYUU C7 U � �ooC�,m M r U) � o E mr z rn� = U m cu U) cn O V O U O fO - W LO > N Or V �}. •�lz uq may`.- � 0 0 0 0 0 V CD co V a0 0 0 0 0 0 0000a Q1 E E E O � (7 5 o m�E 00o0Uo SSam oC16-oco}E (U'OD ccccc0003o nn�wUU 0 00 �O,gooL 0EE0 O UN 0 0Z Q 0U m w❑LL UU a U U co d =C •16 + 2 Q- U) 'Sg� SO N 01 lCO7 O Q U) (O O = " 1� Q7 U1 A N N N C c o 7 N iC C lO O w m O j �Q U c��da2aCDmC)It �J v r�ou�r��rn� cncry mo O O N r O 00 O O O O O N Cl 0 _ N � E LL LL 0 7 ?°�' y�it is @ C(n p ai n o o upps U_p a=i Q O U Q 8 °: N N 67 w c U C C C C U m 07 p7 OI CA 00 } r � N N M 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C d 0 cm CO Y 'C N N 7 .y. Nr 000 r) a 7 j m m J J m Q U 7==rZ= �.o UCr5a0pU 0 U ol n nQO_Jw0 a�co NW 5 LL N J U7 m 0 J U0-0U�(L 0) CO m LO mid "- - V7:7em CN N D G)hhm a0 Uao<0vrCO C r r m rn n 'n n m M cC7 rcq N ¢ N cfl1-oco- cl NCO'7 MN Qf r cl] O 0 LL N O O C.N N LO C7 C7 Qr r (O N Massachusetts Cultural Resource Information System Scanned Record Cover Page Inventory No: YAR.423 a` Historic Name: Chase, Lafayette Kelley House Common Name: I Address: 9 Homer Ave Ind I III City/Town: Yarmouth Village/Neighborhood: South Yarmouth Village; Bass River Local No: 267 Year Constructed: c 1860 Architect(s): Architectural Style(s): Colonial Use(s): Single Family Dwelling House Significance: Architecture Area(s): YAR.H: South Yarmouth - Bass River Historic District Designation(s): Nat'l Register District (05129/1990) Building Materials(s): Wall: Wood; Wood Clapboard The Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) has converted this paper record to digital format as part of ongoing projects to scan records of the Inventory of Historic Assets of the Commonwealth and National Register of Historic Places nominations for Massachusetts. Efforts are ongoing and not all inventory or National Register records related to this resource may be available in digital format at this time. The MACRIS database and scanned files are highly dynamic; new information is added daily and both database records and related scanned files may be updated as new information is incorporated into MHC files. Users should note that there may be a considerable lag time between the receipt of new or updated records by MHC and the appearance of related information in MACRIS. Users should also note that not all source materials for the MACRIS database are made available as scanned images. Users may consult the records, files and maps available in MHC's public research area at its offices at the State Archives Building, 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, open M-F, 9-5. Users of this digital material acknowledge that they have read and understood the MACRIS Information and Disclaimer (http://mhc-ma-qris.net/macrisdisclaimer.htm) Data available via the MACRIS web interface, and associated scanned files are for information purposes only. THE ACT OF CHECKING THIS DATABASE AND ASSOCIATED SCANNED FILES DOES NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS. IF YOU ARE REPRESENTING A DEVELOPER AND/OR A PROPOSED PROJECT THAT WILL REQUIRE A PERMIT, LICENSE OR FUNDING FROM ANY STATE OR FEDERAL AGENCY YOU MUST SUBMIT A PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM TO MHC FOR MHC'S REVIEW AND COMMENT. You can obtain a copy of a PNF through the MHC web site (www.sec.state. ma. uslmhc) under the subject heading "MHC Forms." Commonwealth of Massachusetts Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 www.sec.state.ma.us/mhc This file was accessed on: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 at 10:51 AM r FORM B - BUILDI:'G 'MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Office of the Secretary, State House, Boston -i. Tip. Draw Sheteli of building location in relation to nearest cross streets and other buildings, indicate north. Main Street H L30 m e r A e e n u e Pleasant Street In Area no. F 1'11; I:U. Y26T qg 3 Yarmouth Bass River ss 9 Homer Avenue kt use Residence, for sale by -- Lovequist Agency nt owner Ms* Shirley Chase ipti0n: ------- c. 186Q-_- rc --Sight -- -- �. - - _w Georgian re Induction _ ;�1•t;hllt'�;t Exterior wail fabric_ Ciagboar4 Hai rated white - Barn -garage with 1891 sign Outbuildings (describe) -on,unnted shingles Other features In residential area,_ Rood con- dition, lame and lovely garden takes up another lot from house to Pleasant Street _Altered x Datc Moved ]ate- 5. I,ot size - One acre or less .96 Over one acre__ Approximate frontage 40 Approximate distance of building; from street 201 G. Recorded by Susan Greene Organization Yarmouth Historical Survey Date October 1979 37M-7-77 7. Original owner (if known) Original use Subsequent uses (if any) and dates 8. Themes (check as many as applicable) Aboriginal Conservation Recreation Agricultural Education Religion Architectural, Exploration/ Science/ The Arts settlement invention Commerce Industry _ Social/ Communication Military humanitarian_ Community development Political Transportation 9. Historical significance (include explanation of themes checked above) I visited Shirley Chase in an Orleans nursing home where she told me about growing up in this house. She is sad to be selling the house and large garden, but as all old houses, it is too much for a 91 year old woman to care for. Shirley moved there when she -tas 2 or 3 years old. Her father Lafayette Chase bout the house around 1890 shortly after he married Clara Philips Shaw, an off —Caper. Lafayette was the son of Sea Captain Theopholis Chase who lived across the street, (see building form ;i ). Lafayette Kelley Chase was aboard the tliree masted schooner "William L. Bradley" at age 19, as well as the schooners "Calvin F. Baker" and "Hattie N. Grove" later. After his retirement from the sea his daughter says he worked in a shoe shop on Bridge Street. After leaving his wife, "Laf" took a second wife and lived for a while on Station Avenue, then went to work and live at the Seaman's Institute in Brooklyn, N.Y., where he died. Clara stayed in this house and died at age 99. Their daughter Shirley remained there until two years ago, and the house is now for sale. From the salt works in their back yard, lair. Chase took some foot wide boards which can still be seen in the closets upstairs. He probably also built the shingled barn with white trim boards which is now a garage with the date 1891 placed on it. This large full Cape has one central chimney and one chimney on the extension. A huge central modern dormer over the front door has one large window with lattice work on the pane and green shutters. There is a ground cellar entranceway and a dormer on the back and many extensions. The foundation is brick. The windows are unusual, having a single pane on the bottom and 3 vertical panes on the top. Most unusual is that a full lot belonging to the property is fall of trees, shrubs and flowers. Shirley says her father bought the house from Hattie White, but from the maps and deeds, it would seem the dhites were abutters, not owners. A deed states that fU. Bibliography and/or references (such as local histories, deeds, assessor's records, early maps, etc.) 1. Oral from owner Shirley Chase at Orleans Nursing home, 8 October 1979 2. "Yesterday's 'fide", Florence Baker, 1941 3. "Vital Records to 1850, Yarmouth, Kass", 1975 4. Atlases of Barnstable County 5. Deeds, book 185, P. 542 INVENTORY FORM CONTINUATION SHEET ICMmmity: l Form No: MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL, C. EISSION Bags _..ve.r 267 Office of the Secretary, Boston Property "qrtae Indicate each item on inventory form which is being continued below. Lafayette Chase bought this land from Isaiah Homer in 1890. This would seem likely since Isaiah was a saltworks operator who owned many parcels of land and dwellings in this area at the time. Because of the large number of parcels bought and sold by Romer in this time period, no further evidence of former owners can be found. Staple to Inventory form at bottom TOWN OF YARMOUTH O 1146 ROUTE 28, SOUTH YARMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS 02664-4451 Telephone (508) 398-2231 Ext. 1292 Fax (508) 398-0836 HISTORICAL COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM TO: Mark Grylls, Building Commissioner FROM: Grayce Rogers, Office Administrator of the Historical Commission DATE: December 10, 2020 SUBJECT: 9 Homer Avenue — Construction Request The Yarmouth Historical Commission considered the above referenced property in anticipation of a request for construction. The intended purpose of the construction is to build an accessory building. The Commission held a public meeting on December 10, 2020 to review this request. The Commission recognized that the property is located within the Bass River National Registered Historic District. The Commission reviewed plans and renderings of the proposed structure. The Commission voted unanimously that the design of the construction is appropriate to be built within the Bass River Historic District. Thank you. Cc: Yarmouth Historic Commission Christina Demetriou, Property Owner Joseph Dick, Architect i L&4' i j R � . ,R §f}\( ^ | z { � r . � � - � 7 $ (( !c�«) � \ / ? rr sl 3�1�� I��r ee i La oil I If I` �j Ell O IN=a ■ .i�s�e�i1 G M1?:! H FM9B:��:�:a�: 4 '-� - a a H a r r d 0 r 0 ' �.� R Z w� tea/ 2cr, 2_ II� „s9 z N W =Y� sa'Y JZ ja tH 3 z � - �z z w #��E;�F�ftf;!{ �j�i�F����l1�l�F� 1 � t! -- w_ ❑ -- �Ff -• i,.l d�.is i_I. lt,i.- �_ �-.......,i � ¢ d;.:�4:r.f.E._,-3�5 i s sc ran m a a F a tare= l 2 Z -- -------- p ❑ � $s E- 33 i ex - � ❑ LL➢ 2 E! sill C Q - _ �_' O' I I - 1 a I I I 1 I • I 1 t I I I I I I I i I I ! L _ _ _ J I p iuf a c6 FeFe � g /�/� W OINO K 0.S ¢ V YYa'�$ W gnu Eu�i •! Y 29y o Y�n2 �{` Iid MAMMON M ;� -- aI.'.iNl ON L Jim m im 1 L 4 12 a oH3 v�G�ni1 ��3 cw 9� - "� ' xW = �ui M� Z OH3 Y3 ¢SM lk 4 LY UiS9Y'C LL J � 6 -d Q� N3 O a J r Z W rG � � 3 v g 3g 4 Lo W O'D Q O w s� 9 �W w EVk' d Yea• U�F- i%i an main z LL8 - x$a �5i o r�i3� amp -� -r l "{!iil�iil�li I I a 0 9 N ca o _ o waia h o� ii;it -----------I W: 3 3lx6iil3� O a SP P z0 U Z a�e aG f a� as w O �s za as z t air 4 Ia.. m0 u?G Va F U� C W W F ¢ a C o y JJ �:8 i�� sr Apia g - - r �O a2! 4tY3s� e243�;.i W � n co a J a m4 4 4r iV \\ \ y � � � � <�~ _\�. «</ . � 2�� �. a. w , - . �} .. . $� z7 w - - < . ._.�� . �� ° - � d = � \ « �� � � -5 �.. i \� / . w.\ � %�§\ » : . �,` �� ,\� � \�� /. \� . - • "V . .. '~ � .. � , �,� . .� j . : � ¢- � \ %2 «� / /©�� .. . � �y ��� >_� .\�, &. � &�/ - ... . � z�%�~` f� � :��� a�. \� . <:� \\ � _¢-� \ �� \� \ �* \: �t�����. \ƒ Yarmouth town seal has inaccurate depiction 4 July 2021 Design doesn't represent the Wampanoag Tribe Jeannette Hinkle Cape Cod Times USA TODAY NETWORK YARMOUTH — The first known image of Yarmouth's town seal. which appeared on an 1895 town meeting warrant, shows an Indigenous man clad in red. He holds a tall bow and stands in front of a tipi. If the goal of the Yarmouth townspeople who first adopted the seal was to represent the Vampanoag Tribe. who have been residents of the region for thousands of years. they missed the mark.The Wampanoag never lived in tipis The bow the man in the seal is holding is the wrong size His c4othing is not traditional garb for Indigenous people of the area. nor is his headdress. Those are the findings of the Yarmouth Historical Commission's Town Seal Review Subcommittee. which last week presented a report on the seal to the Board of Selectmen after conducting research and consulting with Paula Peters, a Mashpee \/Vampanoag i-member who sits on the tribe's Advisory Committee. The Historical Commission is now charged with forming an ad -hoc committee that would eventually recommend whether the town should consider making changes — or keep the seal the way it is inaccuracies and all. From Peters' perspective. the choice should be clear. "If they decide not to change it, I think they're going to look very foolish in the future because their seal depicts things that just wouldn't even have happened here," Peters said. After learning of the inaccuracies, selectmen didn't say definitively whether they thought the seal should changes. Chairman Mark Forest suggested the decision should ultimately fall to town meeting. But some members intimated they are reluctant to change the seal, speaking to the larger movement within the country to reckon with the nations legacy of racism by removing or changing monuments and symbols that sorne see as perpetuating that legacy today Nothing I found was offensive, and I think to the best of the town's ability at the time they did the best they could to try to honor ('the Indigenous people). really," said Selectman Tracy Post. "I just think that were in a culture where we continue to try to change that and erase history, and no matter what YOU come up with, somebody is not going to be happy.' Selectman} Michael Stone said he thinks a tipi looks better for a town seal than a wetu. the traditional dwelling of the Wampanoag. He also said he doesn't see anything offensive about Yarmouth's seal. "I'm not saying I'm against changing it. I'm not," Stone said. "What I'm saying is to look at it from some cultural vantage point without considering the artistic quality of the seal, to me, that's politicizing something to an extent that I can't accept." Stone abstained from the vote authorizing members of the Historical Commission to suggest a process for deciding if the seal should be changed. Newly elected Selectman Peter Smith sees the issue differently. "I do not see this as erasing history, I see it as correcting history, and I think that's a very important distinction," he said, drawing applause from members of the public who attended the meeting. How the Yarmouth seal came to be In its review of the seal's history, the Town Seal Review Subcommittee did not wade into the thorny topic of whether the town seal should be changed. Instead, it focused how Yarmouth came up with the emblem, which adorns everything from the town hall facade to official municipal documents. The subcommittee's research was hampered by coronavirus restrictions, which meant members couldn't access town clerk files from 1885 to 1900. Those files, members said, might shed more light on guidance selectmen at the time gave to the designer hired to make the seal. Still, members were able to construct a timeline of the seal's creation, beginning with the 1892 decision by town meeting to authorize selectmen to come up with a seal. The description of the yet -to -be -designed seal was officially sanctioned by town meeting in 1894. That description outlines the size of the seal, the desired inscription and a description of the imagery that should fill the design. "On the left side of the foreground, a pine tree; in the middle foreground, an Indian holding a bow and arrow; in the right foreground, a wigwam; in the left background, a lighthouse on a point of land extending into the sea, and a schooner, under sail, passing near it," the bylaw description reads. The seal that ultimately appeared on Yarmouth's 1895 Town Meeting warrant depicted a tipi instead of a wigwam, a domed structure referred to as a wetu by the Wampanoag. Admitting it's merely speculation, Historical Commission Vice -Chair George Slama said the seal's design could have been influenced by press coverage of efforts by the U.S. government to displace Indigenous people from their ancestral lands. Two years before Yarmouth town meeting members decided to create a town seal, between 150 and 300 Lakota were slaughtered by U.S. Army troops in the Wounded Knee Massacre. Slama said coverage of that event would have likely included photographs of tipis, a Lakota dwelling. "What you can realize is that The Boston Globe and the newspapers are covering all of the continued etnocide and genocide out on the Plains," he said. Smith pointed out that the town seal was designed within years of the 1887 passage of the Dawes Act, which the National Park Service notes was one of several U.S. policies designed to assimilate Indigenous people into white American culture, in part by creating divisions among tribes. Yarmouth documents created around the time of the seal's adoption shed some light on townspeople's views about Native Americans in the late 19th century. The town celebrated its 250th anniversary in 1889, and townspeople quoted in a celebratory booklet published in recognition of the anniversary referred to the Indigenous people of the area as "savages" multiple times. A prayer included in the booklet quotes the Rev. John Dodge as thanking God for defending early settlers "from the savage." An address by Philip Howes Sears, a descendant of one of Yarmouth's first settlers, lauds the town's founders for their piety, entrepreneurial spirit, dedication to education, and for their "Christian charity in the treatment of their savage neighbors," "Whatever Indian wars might elsewhere arise, during King Philip's war and all other troubles and disturbances, the native tribes throughout this county remained uniformly pacific and faithful," Sears is quoted as saying. "What volumes does this speak for the justice and Christian conduct of those who then inhabited this town and this county! What's next for the Yarmouth town seal? Slama said the Historical Commission, which meets next week, will now create guidelines dictating the makeup and mission of the committee that will be tasked with exploring the fate of the town seal. Those guidelines, which would include the process by which the committee would collect public comment, will likely be presented to town meeting voters in the fall for approval, Slama said. Other Massachusetts towns, including Mashpee and Natick, are also reviewing town seals featuring Native American imagery, Slama said. The Historical Commission will model Yarmouth's review on the work already underway in those towns, he said. Selectman Dan Horgan, who made the motion to have the Historical Commission develop a plan for further review of the seal, said he looks forwardto seeing what could be done to "bring our seal to a higher plain, one that can be proud of and one that we can be assured is culturally sensitive and accurate as possible." "l don't think it's a waste of time," he said. 1 think it's important." Yarmouth Draft Town Meeting Warrant To see if the Town will vote to establish a Town Seal Review Committee consisting of a minimum of seven members appointed by the Select Board, said committee to include persons suited to the charge of the committee by their expertise interest and familiarity with history, design, and tide participation, and whose charge shall be to review the findings of the Historical Commission's report on the history and current imagery of the Yarmouth seal; to consider whether or not the Town should adopt a new Town Seal after a public process that shall include consultation with a diverse group of stakeholders; to hold multiple public forums; and to provide a report and recommendation to a future Town Meeting that recommends whether or not the Town should adopt a new Town Seal and that, if the recommendation is to adopt a new Town Seal, also includes a proposed process for creating and funding a phased multi -year roll -out of a new Town Seal. Proposed - Seal Review Committee Members Town Clerk Chair Town Historian Vice -Chair Administrative Registrar Town Planner Member Library Director Member School Dept. Rep Member Arts/Cultural Rep Member Historical Commission Member Social Media Coordinator Member Note: Tribal input through Wampanoag Advisory Committee 17-Nov Mashpee Board of Selectman Meeting December 16, 2019 Town Manager Rodney C. Collins brought forth a recommended composition of membership for the establishment of a Town Seal Committee. The seven - member ad hoc advisory committee would present a proposed Town Seat to be approved by the Board of Selectmen and presented to Town Meeting for adoption. The members would have the resources available to recognize the culture and history of the Town of Mashpee to develop a proposal to be appreciated and valued by the Town. The composition would consist of one Selectman member to Serve as Chair. The Administrative Assistant Terrie Cook who would also perform the duties of recording secretary, the Town Planner Evan Lehrer, the Library Director Kathleen Mahoney, the School Superintendent Patricia DeBoer, Historical Commission member Joan Tavares - Avant and a Tribal Council designee to be determined by the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council. Chair - Selectman Administrative Assistant/ Recorder Town Planner Library Director School Superintendent Historical Commission Member Tribal Council Designee Framingham The mission of the Framingham City Seal Development Committee is to create a new city seal that represents the essence of Framingham. Through our research and exploration, together with the community, we will reflect on Framingham's past, present, and future. We will consider a multitude of positive Framingham attributes including but not limited to its diversity and culture, opportunity, sense of community, history and landmarks, industry and economy, education, and arts and recreation. Seal Review Committee Members Chair -City Clerk Vice Chair - Town Historian, Historical Commission Clerk, Small Business Owner School Committee Member Framingham Histor Center Social Media Coordinator Former Moderator Westborough Article i6 May 15, 2021 To see if the Town will vote to establish a Town Seal Review Committee consisting of a minimum of seven and a maximum of nine residents appointed by the Moderator, said committee to include persons suited to the charge of the committee by their interest and familiarity with history, design, and chic participation, and whose charge shall be to review the history of Town Seals in Westborough; to consider whether or not the Town should adopt a new Town Seal after a public process that shall include consultation with a diverse group of stakeholders; to hold multiple public forums; and to provide a report and recommendation to a future Town Meeting that recommends whether or not the Town should adopt a new Town Seal and that, if the recommendation is to adopt a new Town Seal, also includes a proposed process for creating a new Town Seal. Seal Review Committee Members Natick Article 16 October 20, 2020 Town Seal Review Committee will have up to seven individuals appointed by the Moderator, said committee to include persons suited to the charge of the committee by their interest and familiarity with history, design, and civic participation, and whose charge shall be to review the history of Town Seals in Natick; to propose a new Town Seal after a public process that shall include consultation with a diverse group of stakeholders including members of Indigenous communities; to hold at least one public forum; and to provide a report and recommendation to a future Town Meeting that shall consider implementation of a new seal." (202o FATM, Article 16) Seal Review Committee Members Lincoln T Anniballi David losselyn Mia R Kheyfetz, Natick Resident Niki C Lefebre, Director Natick Historical Society Simone Poliandri, Natick Town Meeting Rep, Assoc Prof Anthropology Native American Studies Todd G Sonneborn, Natick Resident Sandra LaFleur, Libraries Professional, Assistant Registrar 2015 Virginia Mayo Saul S Beaumont, Natick Resident DRAFT - 18 NOV 21 MEMO TO: Mark Forest, Chairman, and the Honorable Board of Selectmen FROM: Julie Mockabee, Chair, Yarmouth Historical Commission SUBJECT: Yarmouth Town Seal Phase II Review — Proposed Next Steps DATE: November 18, 2021 On Tuesday, June 29, 2021, the Yarmouth Historical Commission (YHC) presented its research on the history of the Yarmouth Town Seal and the review of the accuracv of the Native People's imager- of the seal. The Commission found that the current native imagery was not an accurate representation of the Wampanoag culture and therefore does not accurately "preserve and promote" the history of the Indigenous Peoples who have been on this land for over 1o,000 years. Upon completing discussion of the YHC findings, the Select Board concurred with the YHC findings and voted to present an article at the April 2022 Town Meeting asking if the Town should establish a Town Seal Review Committee that would ascertain whether the current seal imagery should be changed. The Select Board also requested that the YHC prepare a "Phase II - Next Steps Plan" that will be presented at the Town Meeting. As such, the Commission recommends that the Select Board establish an Ad Hoc Committee: "consisting of a minimum of seven members appointed by the Select Board, said committee to include persons suited to the charge of the committee by their expertise interest and familiarity with history, design, and civic participation, and whose charge shall b/(a review the findings of the Historical Commission's report on the history and current imagery of the Yarmouth seal; to consider whether or not the Town should revise the Town Seal after a public process that shall include consultation with a diverse group of stakeholders; to hold multiple public forums; and to provide a report and recommendation to a fixture Town Meeting that recommends whether or not the Town should revise the Town Seal and that, if the recommendation is to adopt a new Town Seal, also includes a proposed process for creating and funding a multi -year phased roll -out of a new To- n Seal." The "Suggested Committee Composition" (Attached) takes into consideration that this reN iew process will cut across a number internal and external "stakeholders". Therefore, the chair of this committee should . be someone who has the ability and respect of Town Meeting, the Select Board and committee "stakeholders" to ensure a thorough and timely completion of the review process. Attachment Yarmouth Historical Commission Town Seal Review Committee Next Steps DRAFT — 18 Nov 21 TowTn Meeting Article To see if the Tow n , 611 vote to establish a Town Seal Re6ew Committee "consisting of a minimum of seven members appointed by the Select Board, said committee to include persons suited to the charge of the committee by their expertise interest and familiarity with history, design, and civic participation, and xvhose charge shall be to review the findings of the Historical Commission's report on the history and current imagery of the Yarmouth seal; to consider whether or not the Town should revise the Town Seal after a public process that shall include consultation with a diverse group of stakeholders; to hold multiple public forums; and to provide a report and recommendation to a future Town Meeting that recommends whether or not the Town should revise the Town Seal and that, if the recommendation is to adopt a new Town Seal, also includes a proposed process for creating and funding a multi -year phased roll- out of a new Town Seal." Project Plan Mission Statement: Recent Yarmouth Visioning participants "stressed the importance of continuing to preserve and promote our Town's history". The mission of the Yarmouth Seal Review Committee is to reNriew the history and imagery of the Yarmouth Seal as presented to the Select Board by the Yarmouth Historical Commission on Thursday, June 29, 2021. The Commission found that the current native imagery on the seal was not an accurate representation of the Wampanoag culture and therefore does not accurately "preserve and promote" the history of the Indigenous Peoples who have been on this land for over mono years. Through research and exploration, together r with the community, the Committee will reflect on Yarmouth's present, and future. The Committee will consider a multitude of positive Yarmouth attributes including but not limited to its culture, opportunity, sense of community, history and landmarks, industry and economy, education, and arts and recreation. 0 Suggested Committee Composition: Assistant Town Administrator Chair Town Clerk Historical Commission Rep Administrative Wampanoag Tribal Rep Tow nner (� n Library ctor School Dept. Rep Community Arts/Cultural Rep Community Outreach: o Public Meetings o Visioning Style Survey o Town Social Media Outreach o Notices at Town Libraries & Yarmouth Schools o Non -Profit Preservation Groups Graphics Design Services: o Graphics for a new or revised Town Seal that could encompass multiple areas as does the current seal. Cost Analysis — Revised Town Seal Image - Phased Roll -Out i.e.: w n/(O�. la o New Uniforms o New Badges r o New Vehicles o New Stationary (�11 o New/Replace Building Seal Signs Identify current Town Seal Uses • i.e. o Stationary �, t- �D o Social Media o Town Buildings o Town Vehicles o Uniforms o Badges Seek Phased Roll -Out Funding Opportunities Draft By -Laws Changes: o Description of new Town Seal o Define Town Clerk's oversight of the official town seal copyright (consistency of use) both internally and externally TOWN OF YARMOUTH 0 1146 ROUTE 28, SOUTH VARNIOUTH, MASSACHL27SETTS 02664-4451 �•, Telephone (508) 398-2231 Est. 1292 Fax (508) 398-0836 HISTORICAL COMMISSION TO: John H. McCormack, Chair Cape Cod Commission Regulatory Committee FROM: Julie Mockabee, Chair Yarmouth Historical Commission CC: Yarmouth Board of Selectmen RE: Blue Sky Towers Monopole DATE: May 28, 2021 At their May 13, 2021 meeting, the Yarmouth Historical Commission discussed the Blue Sky Tower's proposed installation of a 120' monopole to be located at 1044 Route 28, South Yarmouth. While the proposed tower location is not within the boundaries of the Bass River Historic District, it is located in close proximity (0.2 miles away from the nearest boundary (12 Forest Road)). Comprising 108 acres, the Bass River Historic District is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The district is characterized by an unusually well- preserved mix of residential, institutional, and commercial structures dating from the 18`h, 191h, and 20`h centuries. At their meeting, the Yarmouth Historical Commission reviewed and discussed the visual simulations submitted as part of the Blue Sky Application to the Cape Cod Commission, noting the negative visual impact to the Bass River Historic District of the exposed antennas located on the 120' cell tower. The Photolog map submitted to the Cape Cod Commission indicates the cell tower will be visible within the District from Photo Location 3 (see attached). The Historical Commission is concerned for the impacts to the view shed and potential degradation of the integrity of the District. With limited experience associated with the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) process, the Yarmouth Historical Commission would encourage the Cape Cod Commission to reach out to Yarmouth residents, in particular property owners within the Bass River Historic District, to inform them about the proposed cell tower project. TOWN OF YARMOUTH 1146 ROUTE 28, SOUTH YARMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS 02664-4492 Telephone (508) 398-2231, Ext. 1276, Fax (508) 398-2365 Planning Division MEMORANDUM ck)�� To: Planning Board From: Kathy Williams, Town Planner Date: November 12, 2021 Subject: Blue Sky Tower — Cell Tower at 1044 Route 28, South Yarmouth Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Resubmission Application Cape Cod Commission (CCC) Please find attached the resubmission materials from Blue Sky Towers regarding the proposed cell tower at 1044 Route 28. Also attached are the noted relevant pieces of information from previous submissions, including Staff and Planning Board comments. At this time, we are awaiting input from Isotrope Wireless, the CCC's peer reviewer, on the supplemental materials. The Public Hearing date has not been set, but would be sometime on or after December 6, 2021. Anticipating that the Planning Board would like to provide comments on the new submission, the attached materials are being presented for discussion at the November 17th Planning Board meeting. Further discussion and possible comment letter could be reviewed at the December I" meeting, when we hope to have received comments from Isotrope Wireless. The modifications to the proposal are summarized on the second page of the attached October 25'h Cover Letter. Briefly, they are proposing to reduce the height from 120' to 110', bring the antennas closer to the pole using 6' antenna frames rather than 12', include more landscaping, use 6' solid fencing, and locate utilities underground. There are currently no options to camouflage the tower in any way. • Plans: The equipment area is more concealed with plantings and a solid 6' fence (rather than chain link). They have reduced the clearing limits north and west of the pole/equipment area, but increased tree removal near Route 28 to install a larger stormwater management system. It is unclear if any existing larger trees would remain on the eastern and southern side of the pole. Regardless, the height of the pole will far exceed the height of the existing trees. • Renderings: There are many superfluous renderings showing no impacts from locations very far from the project site (the attached has been reduced to show relevant locations only). Although they did include additional renderings, many locations chosen do not fully reflect the impacts along Route 28 (i.e. the parking lot of McDonalds). In addition, the renderings are only showing two carriers, when the applicant is requesting permitting for four. I have requested the renderings show the full extent of what could be permitted. • Previous Comments: For easy reference, I have attached the previous comment letters from the Planning Board and Town Staff. Planning Board Blue Sky `Power —DRI Resubmission November 12, 2021 • Coverage and Siting Analysis: Attached is the supplemental information provided by AT&T and T-Mobile submitted October 25, 2021 (currently under review by Isotrope Wireless), along with the August 2021 Peer Review Comments from Isotrope Wireless. Also attached is an Alternative Site Analysis completed in July 2021. ATTACHMENTS: • Cover Letter from Duval & Klasnick, October 25, 2021 • Revised Project Plans, October 25, 2021 • Revised Renderings (relevant locations only) • Previous Planning Board and Staff Comments o June 2, 2021 Planning Board Letter o June 10, 2021 Town Planner Comment Memo from 6/9/21 Public Hearing o June 1, 2021 Town Planner Comment Memo +. Coverage & Siting Analysis o AT&T (Cz Systems), October 2021 o T-Mobile, October 2021 a Isotrope Wireless Peer Review Comments, August 3, 2021 o July 7, 2021 Alternative Site Analysis Page 2 of 2 DUVAL & KLASNICK LLC COUNSELORS AT LAW Daniel D. Klasnick Incensed iu Alassachusetts, New Hampshire and lVew York Desk: (781) 873-0021 - nlobile: C774) 249-2814 dklasnick@dkt-legal.com dkt-legal.com October 25, 2021 Cape Cod Commission 3225 Main Street P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, Massachusetts 02630 Re: Development of Regional Impact Application Proposed Monopole Tower Facility 1044 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MA Dear Commission Members: In compliance with the Cape Cod Commission Act and Commission's Enabling Regulations, Blue Sky Towers 111, LLC d/b/a BSTMA III, LLC (`Blue Sky") received a referral to the Cape Cod Commission for a mandatory Development of Regional Impact from the Town of Yarmouth Building Commissioner dated August 9, 2021. The mandatory referral relates to a telecommunications tower facility project to be located on the property at 1044 Route 28 that had been procedurally withdrawn following a prior referral by the Town of Yarmouth Building Commissioner to the Cape Cod Commission, reviewed by staff with a properly noticed public hearing held with a subcommittee on Wednesday, June 9, 2021. As part of the prior referral, Blue Sky with the support of T-Mobile Northeast, LLC ("T- Mobile") and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") had provided documentation for the proposed telecommunications tower facility project. Blue Sky respectfully requests that the following documents for the project entitled Blue Sky Towers. Monopole, Yarmouth (Cape Cod Commission File No. 21005) be placed into the record for the current matter: ➢ 2021-03-10 Blue Sky Towers - DRI Application Narrative (entered on March 08, 2021) ➢ 2021-03-10 Blue Sky Towers — Exhibits (entered March 10, 2021) ➢ 2021-07-07 Blue Sky Towers - Dish Letter of Interest (entered on June 23, 2021) ➢ 2021-07-07 Blue Sky Towers - AT&T Supplemental RF Submission (entered July 06, 2021) ➢ 2021-07-07 Blue Sky Towers — T-Mobile Supplemental RF Submission (entered July 07, 2021) ➢ 2021-07-07 Blue Sky Towers - Supplemental Alternative Site Analysis (entered July 07, 2021) ➢ 2021-07-07 Blue Sky Towers - Stormwater Report (entered on July 07, 2021) _ . ------ __-- ........ OuK Expiamsi:. YOUR FuTuRru SUCCFEDINt: TOGETHRM.(9 With consideration of questions and comments contained in the May 3, 2021 report provided by Isotrope Wireless, June 7, 2021 Staff Report, memorandum from the Town of Yarmouth Planning Board, Historic Commission and staff and the matters discussed at the June 9, 2021 subcommittee meeting for the initial mandatory Development of Regional Impact review, Blue Sky, T-Mobile and AT&T have undertaken a number of changes to the equipment, design and features of the proposed telecommunications tower facility to be located at 1044 Route 28 in the Town of Yarmouth. ORIGINAL PROPOSED WIRELESS REVISED PROPOSED WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY COMMUNICATION FACILITY •:• 120' Four Carrier Monopole Tower ❖ 110' Four Carrier Monopole Tower •:• 12-Foot Antenna Equipment Frames :• 6-Foot Antenna Equipment Frames + 15' Spacing Between Antenna RAD ❖ 10' to 11' Spacing Between Antenna Center RAD Center ❖ T-Mobile 9 Antennas and 2'0 Dish ❖ T-Mobile 6 Antennas at a Centerline Antenna at a Centerline Mount Height Mount Height of 106-Feet of 115-Feet •:+ AT&T 6 Antennas at a Centerline ❖ AT&T 6 Antennas at a Centerline Mount Height of 100-Feet Mount Height of 95-Feet ❖ 5,250 Square Foot (70' x 75') Ground •;• 3,300 Square Foot (55' x 60') Ground Space Surrounded by a 6-Foot High Space Surrounded by a 6-Foot Stockade Chain Link Fence with Barbed Wire Fence 12-Foot Wide Locked Entrance and 12-Foot Wide Locked Entrance Gate. Gate. •;• Required Tree Clearing 11,390 Square ❖ Required Tree Clearing 9,960 Square Feet Feet •;• Facility Electric and Telephone Lines •:+ Facility Electric and Telephone Lines Run Overhead Run Underground ❖ Landscape Fenced Area with 13- 4' to 6' ❖ Enhanced Landscaping of Fenced Area Trees & 13- 4 to 6' Thuja Occidentalis consisting of 3 different Evergreen trees `American Pillar' Evergreen Trees (6-Atlantic White Cedar, 4-American Holly, 8-Eastern Red Cedar) and 6 different shrubs (6-Rosebay Rhododendron, 5-Beach Plum, 8- Highbush Blueberry, 8-Northern Bayberry, 7-American Cranberry Bush, 5-Chokeberry) — Design by Consultant ` Place Alliance 2 To reflect the revisions to the proposed telecommunications tower facility and to assist the Subcommittee in its review of the Development of Regional Impact review application, I am providing materials submitted by Blue Sky Towers with support from T-Mobile and AT&T. • Application Cover Sheet; • Stamped Project Plans; • Photo Simulations; • T-Mobile Supplemental RF Statement and • AT&T Supplemental RF Statement. Should you require any additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Very truly yours, DUVAL & KLASNICK LLC By: Daniel D. Klasnick Attorney at Law cc: Steven DeYoung, Chair Zoning Board of Appeals (w/hard copies of enclosures) Kathy Williams, PE, Yarmouth Town Planner (w/electronic and hard copies of enclosures) Mark Grylls, Director of Inspectional Services/Building Commissioner (w/hard copies of enclosures) Kelly Grant, Conservation Administrator (w/hard copies of enclosures) Mary Maslowski, Town Clerk (w/hard copies of enclosures) Julie Mockabee, Chair, Historical Commission (w/hard copies of enclosures) Bruce Murphy, Health Director (w/hard copies of enclosures) 3 I & m k2ƒ �k / / s % {\ ƒ c eu / -- ? @ /f � 7§ � _ \ \7 -c %\ 0 /J }/ $ E \ y § 0 » (\ 2k 4-0 � k\ a �_ f O kj f {rn ƒ � §{ � k} a £\ 0 4-J o r- _ � e7 0 L 0 M E in �^ S 00 C � aA Q cc •• r� � O ! QJ r" ■ , O cn C N Ql CO N � O N u � C � 3 Y o d N C O pp C c O i O G G `O o a � v la-7 00 ' w v Ln of o a c {� T O -O C v0i O a L CL N as 0 C O ' ^ i O V O L L,n^ E N Q W O 0 v Q , �y Q ' _ N C = Y C� O v T 0 o M +� o� O a 0 C O L m l„ 1 O J 00 v N 4� X N 0 It C- O Q Q Q 2 ° N h1 0 N a-j a � , E 0 k _ r � � 0 § E i T \ CO � 2 o x wi E C) C O < Lr) � � _ \ q /c N a. 01 51l3M01 aasx3a e�wa,uad �x sx of x bBBNLS M8 in? aasN3a a�aaauia ix is co � iUIS 3l11B swu,�ai %n af7 srarcu us rms eon �x e e 3 g € _ iv:ia 2�51 .i�sia aoi n�ssi ox t x� i -- — '•' ,xasax aoi a3nssi x co a i85Z0 Yl[ $dllalf%1'A H.LlTOS �xanvi aai a�,ssi � i pZ %i�0% Ii07 'SS87IaQy ra7s-rX ar%axnx %Ls L H. - rvarO9-j 'III SRi3M0 e L d Sai msN3a sLLwMa3a l sc of c i[ruu ma 799 "s 3ma- ///�����' ObN3tl ORILLi3 3d5� CO 0 1 GO t Jn 'Li saAw Aws my �- N O OHLLl�ntl3tl W 03n5li 10 $ ww E •3N3tl tl0i 03055" lz " . i 7a173LLdd9 3: E iv ` nO! 03055� OL [ r, 3 �' o E fip 4] w3n3M eDi tl3nss [n 0 %ma FN 'gMYl Hms ©o M3N11 uoi a3nss� si ro RT .TAW ►IOF -,SS29a" % — O L a3sN3e 9nuiinn3a i zz . e 1019-rm 7 emm SIIS V] /� M3N3b b0i O3n.. i 90 1 t+ a N 4 r _- ro nLL $W71 Him 7T �� •����Fa�67 da -r. y I - - 1l3rOL anaoxonitg 7 Wa a .. -_U!"O - EL- ZI...... .. .... •.:' _ __ - � ;gym __—_---�- ---- ------ pp o!'n -� JJ I �11.� tom ti =, z } S W 21 LU < L r WS, O ©O log '� §z "WIN W""EMWO11,111stiamaL "rd zu AN5 3n - = ax• M,�xfd q, nfnss Iz , ton arL w saruu .us I= � ]N]x Noi 6]n55112 6 20 f , •9 3 U+l xaf 6]I55102 [ LI 3 •�I M3NH bOf 031K51 L U j8ira Yx 17zwm'L 8jl10$ :. s3N3N w, 6313516` C ] at rim ON Is may L m O s35N3b �NWxxb3d LL A M-M WISMN LUS MJM]6' lRli 63f1551 4 Y Sift MA EM SQfIN iris $M06K]tl llr� 0 7pQ x M$ p a (sLne aoNoere arr •3,rb xre •xouruNnoi eNlonc]N17 b3roL nomNon fal mi salt SrNnLM vna 3ieon-. (d) i *.N, '" 2m i a srNN;axr ]31ria 2�ir fe) ! s,s:e � o�,�� 5� S` (sa]lua net srxn]Lxr ]]Nra Gt) sw � �u^gym � � �'+ {sn3wo we) srxN3LNr �3xrd {f) 3 :.rc +m�f F a3 n7 � 1 A>: I 1 O 3` -- id 1CL�JF� Qek KI"; A M —V �1 � �`y��3_ I I I I 8W I Sw n r m moo W ZAP cts° � ¢ 1°P20 ar[u�m $awoll 'III Su3M0 03FN3a aNua�n.3a t SL 0i L Kim as a iL's y[.d :ST AIs 3nle o3sM3a a�vu3�na3a �z m .r 6 <+ aNu1 nN3a fA3 03�55� t to CO 0 .7i! 'HI .fl•7I0! US Im R • �;: a MlN3tltl Wd a3n5A YY C 3 .IAa 03M 0 [{ Lt 3 lN3-'_ ' 0 e .3M3. an3 a1ass L co a ►8870 Ili ]�d11G11N►1 H�NBS -:` Q ° aM3a�3�a3a i 3 y raw Yi0!SSiafBQ9 W .]H3a w3 03nssi l 11.3 TR WIMM E&S o sxosn3a nva an Itlaw ►1 H= �HIH 3dlSM. O T 3 W ? N. o O o o O O o n w O I + I F'6 t6 (3JMYN3LMNeY 153b�N}I (slave m�oNv � Nou.oNnoe a.�amaNp 3nmNON Sal mL ..ou I I I C � 4AS. W ui3x x !+ sT S" s aw yz w Z I/ j a $ h N ool (3anJtlY 153Na«7 (S11]B HOWMI A NOLL,G.m,Y�Nna3 ONi0N1]Mil TOea NON [d) mL tall sal : I I + I + a x SOSa GN k�3e daLL� '-� .gig a .y��1p I N 2 ru J r � ,