The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About56 Camp Street-Siguencia REVISED BVW Form 1-30-24BORDERING VEGETATED WETLAND DETERMINATION FORM Project/Site: cs=~ Lu kwf,) at:-City/Town:~ [11vu2u./---/4 Sampling Date: /-do •• .?... '/ Applicant/0wner: ____ ---"1---------------Sampling Point or Zone: _______ _ lnvesti~ator(s): /3-11-u, JVTJ -G.,,ttSc,/ues Latitude/ Longitude: _________ _ Soil Map Unit Name:, ___________________ NWI or DEP Classification: N W / Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ~o CJ (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation D , Soil D , or Hydrology .D_ significantly disturbed? (If yes, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation D , Soil D , or Hydrology I I naturally problematic? (If yes, explain in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map and photograph log showing sampling locations, transects, etc. Wetland vegetation criterion met? Yes ~ Nol:=J Is the Sampled Area Vesi:::8) No c:J Hydric Soils criterion met? Yes NoC:J within a Wetland? Wetlands hydrology present? Yes X NoC:J ' Remarks, Photo Details, Flagging, etc.: HYDROLOGY Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Depth (inches) Saturation Present (including capillary fringe)? Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Indicators Reliable Indicators of Wetlands Hydrology [XhNater-stained leaves LJEvidence of aquatic fauna Otron deposits OAlgal mats or crusts □oxidized rhizospheres/pore linings OThin muck surfaces □Plants with air-filled tissue (aerenchyma) OPlants with polymorphic leaves OPlants with floating leaves Hydrogen sulfide odor Indicators that can be Reliable with Proper Interpretation D Hydrological records ree water in a soil test hole aturated soil Water marks Moss trim lines D Presence of reduced iron D Woody plants with adventitious roots D Trees with shallow root systems D Woody plants with enlarged lenticels Indicators of the Influence of Water Direct observation of inundation Drainage patterns Drift lines Scoured areas Sediment deposits Surface soil cracks Sparsely vegetated concave surface Microtopographic relief Geographic position (depression, toe of slope, fringing lowland Remar s (describe recorded data from stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available): This form is only for BVW delineations. Other wetland resource areas may be present and should be delineated according to the applicable regulatory provisions. Form Revised July 2023 Sampling Point Uf el-' VEGETATION-Use both common and.scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum Plot size cl £1\A,a. ·l l Indicator Absolute Dominant? Wetland Status % Cover (yes/no) lndictor? Common name Scientific name (yes/no) 1. 1:--'v ,.'(v 'y w~n /'1 u,J PN,~J (-~ tr .. r V y. 2. ( t ( 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ..N oY. .. ~ Total Cover ShrubLSaQllng Stratum Plot size Sttha-U Indicator Absolute Dominant? Wetland Status % Cover (yes/no) lndictor? Common name ., Scientific name (yes/no) ' 1. (U/Jil'lz.t:. lrrt 1/+f~ l'f"'7,C,,W ."'\<R-'•r " \J 2 .• (J -( I 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9, Herb Stratum Plot size 4.f b M~ < Jf'., o= Total Cover Indicator Absolute Dominant? Wetland Status % Cover (yes/no) Indicter? Common name Scientific name (yes/no) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 0.0 = Total Cover 2 Form Revised July 2023 Sampling Point. ___ _ VEGETATION -continued. Wood~ Vine Stratum Plot size ./V OM e_, Indicator Absolute Dominant? Wetland Status % Cover (yes/no) lndictor? Common name Scientific name (yes/no) 1. 2. 3. 4. 0.0 = Total Cover RaQid Test: Do all dominant species have an indicator status of OBL or FACW? Yes _l!:::f No I I Dominance Test: Number of Number of dominant species that are Do wetla~nd Indicator plants make up dominant species wetland indicator plants ~ 50% of do in plant species? Yes No l I Prevalence Index: Total% Cover (all strata) Multiply by: Result OBLspecies ~-X1 =0.00 FACW species ,,l'.JY,,, X2 =0.00 /On --FAC species X3 =0.00 FACU species X4 =0.00 UPL species XS =0.00 Column Totals (A) o (B)O ~ Prevalence Index B/AJU)& <.57J'Jo Is the Pre-~a e ndex 5 3.07 Yes No I I Wetland vegetation criterion met? Yes I I No I I Definitions of Vegetation Strata Tree -Woody plants 3 in. (7.62 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height Shrub/ Sapling -Woody plants less than 3 in. (7.62 cm) DBH and greater than or equal to 3.3 ft. (1 m) tall Herb-Woody vines -All herbaceous (non-woody plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.3 ft. (1 m) tall All woody vines greater than 3,3 ft. {1 m) In height Cover Ranges Range Midpoint 1-5 % 3.0% 6-15 % 10.5% 15-25 % 20.5% 26-50% 38.0% 51-75 % 63.0% 76-95 % 85.5% 96-100 % 98.0% Form Revised July 2023 3 Sampling Point we+: I SOIL Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Location2 Texture Remarks S? 16 '-JR II I/ ./t1o vi-< f l 1Type: C=Concentratlon, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location: Pl=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators (Check all that apply) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils .LlHistosol (Al) Ll Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) l.29...2 cm Muck (AlO) .LlHistic Epipedon (A2) ..LJ. Thin Dark Surface {S9) LJ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) LlBlack Histic (A3) l..J. Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) _bi.Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .LJ. Depleted Matrix (F3) □ Mesic Spodic (A17) Dstratified Layers (AS) l..J. Redox Dark Surface (F6) 0 Red Parent Material (F21) .Lloepleted Below Dark Sutface (All) Li Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 0 Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) ~ Thick Dark Surface (A12) D Redox Depressions (FS) L Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) Li_sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ Sandy Redox (55) 0 Other (Include Explanation in Ustripped Matrix (S6) Remarks) .LlDark Surface (S7) Restrictive Layer (if observed) Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric Soils criterion met? Yes lXI No □ Form Revised July 2023 4