Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5103 155 Station Ave Withdrawn Memo to File 06.03.24Y. Z�ORPoeaiE�� TOWN OF YARMOUTH BOARD OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM TO FILE ARMOUTH TOWN CLERK RE PETITION 5103 JUN 3 124 qm9:09 June 3, 2024 MEMBERS SITTING (April 25, 2024 hearing): Vice Chair Sean Igoe, Jay Fraprie, John Mantoni, Barbara Murphy, and Anthony Panebianco. PETITION 5103: Eder de Oliveira Goncalves, 155 Station Avenue, South Yarmouth, MA. Map & Lot #: 79.115; Zoning District: R-40. The Applicant seeks a Special Permit per §407 to create a 325 sq ft i accessory apartment. Additionally, the Applicant requests a waiver from the requirement for a certified site. --'plot plan less than 2 years old. The petitioner was assisted by an interpreter. Vice Chair Igoe read into the record from the violation notice, dated March 5, 2024, from the Building Inspector about an accessory apartment without approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals. The accessory apartment was discovered when the Building Department was called to inspect the property on February 29, 2024 because a car accident had caused one of the cars to crash into the house. Subsequently, the petitioner submitted plans for a 325-square-foot accessory apartment located in an addition behind the garage. However, the minimum square footage for an accessory apartment is 350 square feet. The petitioner could add the square footage to the accessory apartment, but the property is lacking adequate parking for 4 cars (2 dedicated spaces for the main house and 2 dedicated spaces for the accessory apartment). The petitioner was informed that cars cannot be parked on Station Avenue or Lambert Road. All parking must be contained within the petitioner's lot. Prior to the hearing, the Board received a letter of opposition from an abutter. At the hearing, one audience member spoke in favor of the petition. However, the petitioner did not meet the criteria for a Special Permit under §407. As a result, the petitioner requested to withdraw the petition, without prejudice. Vice Chair Igoe cautioned that the violation notice was still in effect and the petitioner must go to the Building Department to determine a remedy. A motion was made by Mr. Fraprie and seconded by Mr. Mantoni to approve the request to withdraw the petition, without prejudice. On a voice vote (5-0), the motion was approved. Sean Igoe, Vice Chair