Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Inquiry 3/3/05 :�¢ �`O� i • -).../4,41TOWN OF YARMOUTH BUILDING DEPARTMENT 6441 1146 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MA 02664 508-398-2231 ext. 261 LOT INQUIRY FORM (used for zoning purposes only) Assessors' Map No. ;"/� j' Lot No. , Street Address f / �,7 � �iy 1 endorsement Date of Subdivision Plan and Type(if applicable) et o Total Land Area(sq. ft.) • _ G . Frontage 4) Name of Current Owner /I%dddress 7 Spy Sir Telephone No. Inquirer's Name(if different from owner) AlaA/4 2) 2/-)i.t,0 Telephone No. 3 i 2- 1�'s-Z7 Inquirer's Mailing Address In / N,7 S7 1'�1 l/ v/ 7/ Building IntentZ/v-unuzi Adjoining Lot Numbers 3 ' _ C� By signing this application I assert my understanding that the purpose of this inquiry is to determine whether the aforementioned lot(s)qualifies for protection afforded certain heretofore-undeveloped land and that to the best of my knowledge this lot(s)has never previously been built upon. Signature of Applicant i2/ v J214-zt Date of Inquiry 3 DECISION (for office use only) j�y��� (%of/ \3- Does not conform to the applicable provisions of M.G.L.Chapter 40A, Section 6,Definitive Plan Exemption and/or the applicable zoning bylaw,as per the information provided on this date. Reason Conforms to the applicable provisions of M.G.L.Chapter 40A, Section 6�or Section 104.3.4,Para. -- of the zoning bylaw,as per the information provided on this date. Comments:, Protected pursuant to the applicable provisions of M.G.L.Chapter 40A,Section 6,Defmitive Plan Exemption. Application is incomplete. Comments: Adequate road access must be present. A determination of adequate access shall be made by the Planning Board pursuant to M.G.L. Chapter 41 prior to the issuance of a building permit.(if applicable.) Shall satisfy Title V requirements.(See Health Dept.) Shall satisfy Conservation regulations,if applicable. Shall satisfy the OldKings Highway Regional Historic District Commission(if applicable) Investigator's Signature Date Rev. 8/02 y - TOWN OF YARMOUTH ‘"`• , a,5!g BUILDING DEPARTMENT 41A 1146 Route 28, South Yarmouth, MA 02664 508-398-2231 ext. 261 LOT INQUj(IIRY FORM (used forzoning purposes only) Assessors' Map No. 1 % Lot No. Street Address r / 2' Af (4T� 1✓et 7 6: 1-67 h;2' 'Endorsement Date of Subdivision Plan and Type(if applicable) �inuc -? oakt6-7 JJ� Total Land Area(sq.ft.) • _ Frontage .�e) G— �,; /JQ,. , vn7 j. 3/ 19,3 Name of Current Owner/ . e /address ? 8°' $" 3 Telephone No. Inquirer's Name(if different from owner) P./ 74 Z7,� Telephone No. , 7$ -317- Inquirer's Mailing Address / //,7 $ r t A t 1 !"��� � / 7/ Building Intent,/o4 �' . � Adjoining Lot Numbers 1 li yf 46 By signing this application I assert my understanding that the purpose of this inquiry is to determine whether the aforementioned lot(s)qualifies for protection afforded certain heretofore-undeveloped land and that to the best of my knowledge this lot(s)has never previously been built upon. r Signature of Applicant 1,2tf2t 7 ( Date of Inquiry / - /' .:.>" 1 DECISION(for office use only) ilcetie,rl/ Does not conform to the applicable provisions of M.G.L.Chapter 40A,Section 6,Definitive Plan Exemption and/or the applicable zoning bylaw,as per the information provided on this date. Reason 1/ f Conforms to the applicable provisions of M.G.L.Chapter 40A,Section 6, or 'on 104.3.4,Para. -5 of the zoning bow,as per the information provided on this date. Comments: 4.p _/C G O h Protected pursuant to the applicable provisions of M.G.L.Chapter 40A,Section 6,Definitive Plan Exemption. Application is incomplete. Comments: Adequate road access must be present. A determination of adequate access shall be made by the Planning Board pursuant to M.G.L.Chapter 41 prior to the issuance of a building permit.(if applicable.) 1' Shall satisfy Title V requirements.(See Health Dept.) Shall satisfy Conservation regulations,if applicable. Shall satisfy the Old gs Highway Regional Historic District Commission(if applicable) ' �� , -ts,` Date Investigator's Signature � Rev. 8/02 1 , g6/1); 94, Stioudi Yarmouth,Massachusetts Ralph Kelleq owner-developer -- i BENJAMIN P CHASE 6 ASSOCIATES ' ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS DENNISPORT, MASS. E;.irsiani t mart WY 'li'oCf3» SCALE 6d•I' JUNE 14,1947 °1p;IJ,HI1N:; YA18-A125 _: 'F 1 SN SNOCI fr9gLl'O- 60•La'N' � \ a 3 � • aG o 0 ro' l d 4ti v a \ Si g3M NNOr 1. 11 $ s — 8v ! cD • i (.4 i 4 ?tPno. % C8 w •• 119,46.14 KW' • 1 co w , • IL � gA$ co go i1N OG/ 4 • 6` 715i 1 • 1 •. co C'''' • 07G[9•, a : � u°oi.d away • $ $ '•v - 'O,,,1' g,6. 4 — 1, a ,a4vs $ I # a '0!.. C ,reps . • r�, 77 �• ,� e3, oa a ,•,r,, � sa,r. 16 4. R • �•Ap�y e- , .•... N M A rs 1W u a yA? I g C 6 M . p 4. : : o 11 11 N 5 :Is °°sort. St� • • v ' ' Y OL E 6 ' § '' E ^~I • PA. S ?its -'t IT �4 ,' . N -4 r- .:- k- r , , , . ... . s. „t• lqbv . it> 6, .. . : — f›. a , . , , .. ‘,1:?.../. . • , ' + N 01 co , r ,�1 i�a •tia 0b s w • . • N -3 ar !°' A, 4:‘ $ N ► 1 • 1 11 t : � p �; I • g *fr� �' • tot. Ill trio ` 4 y w 3. r Q Ti, •.1 4 • 1 •Ir $ID 19 '. %tJ� 1 P. . ` �\ it 91i 0 M ACCT# 1 . 63 MAP 098 LOT K53 Ac LOC 000 6 M nn � i FLOWER TERR Plan ! l� 1 =� SVF6114 r-- DOC. CERT. 1 PROBATE DATE - P-A r:NJ) • S T T'LTz_ ZruX1 /.3 7 _ 5 3r 4).2,-rti R C_cv9. i-43 Zi r c 3( /6)9 Z7- ,..2..2 3 r \k,\-askbi PErEIc. 8°Pe1,1)-6.. bAiq t of L1Eu) 613163. Pgra., CoPeb19s 1- be 39 s37 f9O, 000) 6/3165 M ACCT# 119. 64 MAP 098 LOT K55 �‘ �f..,,, ,,r`� "' LOC 0008 P'AYFLOWER TERR DOC. CERT. PROBATE DATE • /Lei gT Ci',ii?A Tt' `7 2 1 f F= 15-6 C, /i/ac /V /L =-T 'X ) // ,3---71 V lion oc Va rmo 0-h 6[3 17 /35 jria/ er -2j//le Fred. C. ffce.G f/Pi1 6 ,/5 L A n &C/en Ib r7 9 4,- � L Q 3f P u ei'nent 7 -ly SI f L�� 1 1 1 . , .., -x-:x;=-,,,,,x3T...Kc+.ass t... ,,,,,a t..., tee: 9 N _ ACCT# 1,,19. 65 MAP 098 LOT K56 A LOC 0084 MAYFLOWER TERR Plan DOC. CERT. PROBATE r DATE �y� `x �' L W71) , _S , 1A t i6iiks L/v 376 13 6 3/ 0 5 L Pf"Ta pt A, 1ZobN6otJ 14S1,6" IS 'Dam tERr) 6dcu Rd TR,. A-13-0,4 1 SEWAGE PERMIT NO? DATER TABLE (� LOCATION NO. STREET l'KRYFC WereZ f eileaCg INSTALLERS NAME & ADDRESS L..01.G.)( NC e.LLIS &( ., 3It _V 1 LC IAPIS IZC? W s`liffrtIMP- ' DATE PERMIT ISSUED 142 7, DATE OF INSTALLATION I( .2/CF DRAWING OF INSTALLATION ON BACK • k il t� ' A- a Brandolini, Jim From: Kathleen MacNeil <kmacneil@mdaboston.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:33 PM To: Brandolini, Jim Subject: 92 Mayflower Terrace Attachments: email from Engineer on buildability.pdf; Lot plot plan.pdf Dear Mr. Brandolini: We have done some preliminary engineering on a lot at 92 Mayflower Terrace, see attached email from Down Cape Engineering and the survey plan. It appears that the lot is not likely buildable by the time you avoid the wetlands and design a septic, etc. I wonder if you could issue a denial on the town standard form on buildability. The assessor suggested this form as we are currently being taxed as a buildable lot. Let me know your thoughts or if you need additional information. Thank you. Kathy MacNeil 617-549-2478 1 Kathleen MacNeil From: dgonsalves@downcape.com Sent: Friday,January 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: kmacneil@mdaboston.com Cc: 'Heather @ Down Cape Engineering,Inc.' Subject: 92 Mayflower Terrace Attachments: MacNeil Proposal 92 Mayflower Terrace.pdf Kathleen, After doing some additional research on your lot it is looking like the lot is most likely unbuildable. Based on the flood zone maps and the town GIS maps we think the coastal bank will likely take up almost half of your lot.This means we won't have the 10,000 sf of upland required.We wouldn't know for sure until we flagged the wetland and completed our base plan but It does not look promising. I have attached a proposal outlining our costs for this work should you decide you would like to move forward. Feel free to give me a call with any questions. Thanks, Danny E. Gonsalves, EIT Engineer in Training i1r3tR�il Lc9pf_` i-H(IiUiiE Oiliif'; lY1 Tel:508-362-4541 Fax:508-362-9880 This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure,copy,distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. 1 I) BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY,THE PARCEL SHOWN HEREON LIES WITHIN A ZONE AC ARES SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1R ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD, WITH BASE ELEVATIONS DETERMINED AND A ZONE C' (SHADED),AN AREA WITHIN THE 0.2R ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD,AS SHOWN ON THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY(F.EMA) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP(FIRM)FOR BARNSTABLE COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS MAP NUMBER 25001C05631,HAVING AN EFFECTIVE MAYFLOWER TERRACE DATE OF JULY 16,2014. 2) THIS PUN IS COMPILED FROM RECORD DEEDS AND PLANS 4 BOUNDARIES SHOWN MAY CHANGE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY. n 8.493.00. 3) LOCUS PROPERTY MAY BE SUBJECT TO TOWN WETLAND BY14W5. 0 4) PLAN OF PLANNED DOCKS OR PILINGS ILINGSORD NTOI BE PUCEDCATE SW WITHIN DINAH'S POND D IS MAL. YWI BE = SUBJECT TO A CHAPTER 91 LICENSE. I 1 j 1 AE Now,or Formerly = Now or Formerly t No or FormerlyJEAN OAMATO w n 888 AMYFLOWER LW +MRi , NAUMKEC REALTY TRUST BOOK 28550,PACE 325 18.Wg BOOK 28869,PACE 126 h 1iI BOOK 24073,PAGE 280 MAP I19 LOT 64.1 S IMP 119 LOT 64.2 MAP i/9 LOT 63 LOT 54 AREA=13,000± SQ. FT R ,: I 1 APPROXIMATE EDGE OF MARSH - - -- (RECORD LOCATION) COMPILED PLAN - 48'1. #92 MAYFLOWER TERRACE MEAN Fes`' " YARMOUTH, MASS. DINAH'S POND FELDMAN LAND SURVEYORS JANUARY 4, 2017 (TIDAL) 152 HAMPDEN STREET PHONE: (617)357-9740 BOSTON, MASS. 02119 www.feldmonsurveyors.com FELDmnn I AND SURVEYOR ', 20 0 10 20 40 80 No we is minm - A- - SCALE: 1"=20' RESEARCH FIELD CHIEF PRAT MGR APPROVED SHEET NO. OF CALL CARD FIELD CHECKED CRO FILE JOB NO. FILENAME OIL ,\LrpAM.HPFSS\0.etap\MYnOIIER-SYAR.dy Brandolini, Jim To: Kathleen MacNeil Cc: Cipro, Linda; Sears, Tim Subject: RE: 92 Mayflower Terrace Dear Ms. MacNeil: I have reviewed the information provided. My comments are as follows: -The 1947 subdivision plan depicts the frontage to be 80 feet, whereas the January 4, 2016 plan prepared by Feldman Land Surveyors, depicts the frontage to be 48+/-feet. On the basis the lot contains less than the minimum frontage requirement of 75 feet, pursuant to Zoning Bylaw Section 104.3.4, Paragraphs 2 & 5 and less than 50 feet as per Section 104.3.4, Para. 1, this lot does not qualify as a grandfathered parcel. However, I would require Feldman's plan to be stamped by the land surveyor of record and reflect the exact frontage. The plan reflects plus/minus symbols. -With respect to the minimum upland/non-wetland area as a disqualifier; as stated above,Zoning Bylaw Section 104.3.4 contains several provisions for determining whether lots are grandfathered. One of which, Para. 1, provides that a parcel containing a minimum of 5,000 square feet of area and 50 feet of frontage and was not held in common ownership with any contiguous parcels, from the time it became non-conforming to the present, may quality as being grandfathered. Depending on the Surveyor's definitive frontage determination, should the lot contain 50 feet plus, and the ownership of the two adjoining lots continued to be in separate ownership from that of 92 Mayflower Terrace (parcel 64), it is possible this lot may be grandfathered for zoning purposes. Under this Zoning Bylaw provision, upland/non-wetland area minimum is not a requirement. Should you wish to pursue this matter further, I would need the stamped plan,the lot would need to contain a minimum of 50 feet of frontage and I would require an up to date Lot Inquiry form be submitted to determine up to date ownership of the three lots(88, 92, &96 Mayflower Terrace). The inquiry in question was submitted and determined made, in March, 2005. Currently there is a $90 fee to process this type of inquiry form. Finally, all the foregoing information is zoning driven. If it is determined the lot qualifies as being grandfathered, so called, the land and proposed construction would still have to comply with Title V, Conservation, and Old Kings Highway Historical District Commission requirements. Should you decide not to pursue this matter further, please advise and I will provide you with a letter citing the non-compliant zoning provisions. However, I will still need a stamped plot plan from the surveyor certifying the 48 feet frontage as being correct. Very truly, James D. Brandolini, Deputy Building Commissioner From: Kathleen MacNeil [mailto:kmacneilCa�mdaboston.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:33 PM 1 To: Brandolini;Jim Subject: 92 Mayflower Terrace Dear Mr. Brandolini: We have done some preliminary engineering on a lot at 92 Mayflower Terrace, see attached email from Down Cape Engineering and the survey plan. It appears that the lot is not likely buildable by the time you avoid the wetlands and design a septic, etc. I wonder if you could issue a denial on the town standard form on buildability.The assessor suggested this form as we are currently being taxed as a buildable lot. Let me know your thoughts or if you need additional information. Thank you. Kathy MacNeil 617-549-2478 2 Brandolini, Jim From: Brandolini, Jim Sent: Thursday,January 12, 2017 12:08 PM 6114711$7, To: 'Kathleen MacNeil' Cc: Sears, Tim; Grylls, Mark; Cipro, Linda Subject: RE: 92 Mayflower Terrace 111111111111/11111 IDear Ms. MacNeil: I apologize. The plan does depict 80 feet on Mayflower Terrace. That would satisfy the frontage requirement under Zoning Bylaw Section 104.3.4, para. 1, 2 and 5. However, unlike para 5,the provisions of Para. 1 & 2 do not contain a minimum upland/non-wetland area requirement,therefore that issue would be mute. The difference between para. 1 & 2 is that para. 1 covers "single lots"---never held in common ownership with adjoining lots,that contain a minimum of 5,000 sq. feet of land and 50 feet of frontage. Para. 2 covers protection for up to three contiguous lots held in common ownership at the time the lots were conforming and that contain a minimum of 7,500 sq. feet of land and 75 feet of frontage. In order to provide you with a definitive written determination, I suggest you submit a new Lot Inquiry,with the stamped plot plan. Based on what I see right now,the lot may qualify as being grandfathered pursuant to Paragraphs 1 or 2. This updated inquiry will act as the mechanism to make this definitive determination. In summary, we will look to paragraphs 1 & 2 because the lot contains the area and frontage prerequisites, but do not require that a minimum of 10,000 square feet be non-wetland area; whereas,the provisions of para. 5 do. Once I receive the new Lot Inquiry I can then determine, based on ownership tracking and historical area increases, whether this lot is protected/grandfathered for zoning purposes pursuant to those provisions. As noted in yesterday's email, other regulatory matters would need to be addressed as well. James D. Brandolini, Deputy Building Commissioner From: Kathleen MacNeil [mailto:kmacneil@mdaboston.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 5:00 PM To: Brandolini, Jim Cc: Cipro, Linda; Sears, Tim Subject: RE: 92 Mayflower Terrace Is the frontage you refer to that is needed along Mayflower Terrace or the Pond. The survey has 80feet along the Road but only 48' at the pond. From: Brandolini, Jim [mailto:JBrandolini©yarmouth.ma.us] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:20 PM To: 'Kathleen MacNeil' Cc: Cipro, Linda; Sears, Tim Subject: RE: 92 Mayflower Terrace Dear Ms. MacNeil: I have reviewed the information provided. My comments are as follows: 1 • -The 1947 subdivision plan depicts the front o e feet, whereas the January an prepar-d by Feldman Land Surveyors, depicts the frontage to b 48 -fee n the basis the lot contains less than the minimum frontage requirement of 75 feet, pursuant to Zonin Section 104.3.4, Paragraphs 2 & 5 and less than 50 feet as per Section 104.3.4, Para. 1, this lot does not qualify as a grandfathered parcel. However, I would require Feldman's plan to be stamped by the land surveyor of record and reflect the exact frontage. The plan reflects plus/minus symbols. -With respect to the minimum upland/non-wetland area as a disqualifier; as stated above, Zoning Bylaw Section 104.3.4 contains several provisions for determining whether lots are grandfathered. One of which, Para. 1, provides that a parcel containing a minimum of 5,000 square feet of area and 50 feet of frontage and was not held in common ownership with any contiguous parcels, from the time it became non-conforming to the present, may quality as being grandfathered. Depending on the Surveyor's definitive frontage determination, should the lot contain 50 feet plus, and the ownership of the two adjoining lots continued to be in separate ownership from that of 92 Mayflower Terrace (parcel 64), it is possible this lot may be grandfathered for zoning purposes. Under this Zoning Bylaw provision, upland/non-wetland area minimum is not a requirement. / p/ Should you wish to pursue this matter further, I would need the stamped plan, o w need to contain a minimum of 50 feet of frontage and I would require an up to date Lot Inquiry form be submitted to determine up to date ownership of the three lots(88, 92, &96 Mayflower Terrace). The inquiry in question was submitted and determined made, in March, 2005. Currently there is a $90 fee to process this type of inquiry form. Finally, all the foregoing information is zoning driven. If it is determined the lot qualifies as being grandfathered, so called,the land and proposed construction would still have to comply with Title V, Conservation,and Old Kings Highway Historical District Commission requirements. Should you decide not to pursue this matter further, please advise and I will provide you with a letter citing the non-compliant zoning provisions. However, I will still need a stamped plot plan from the surveyor certifying the 48 feet frontage as being correct. Very truly, James D. Brandolini, Deputy Building Commissioner From: Kathleen MacNeil [mailto:kmacneiR mdaboston.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:33 PM To: Brandolini, Jim Subject: 92 Mayflower Terrace Dear Mr. Brandolini: We have done some preliminary engineering on a lot at 92 Mayflower Terrace, see attached email from Down Cape Engineering and the survey plan. It appears that the lot is not likely buildable by the time you avoid the wetlands and design a septic, etc. I wonder if you could issue a denial on the town standard form on buildability.The assessor suggested this form as we are currently being taxed as a buildable lot. Let me know your thoughts or if you need additional information. Thank you. Kathy MacNeil 617-549-2478 2 • Brandolini, Jim From: Kathleen MacNeil <kmacneil@mdaboston.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 9:49 AM To: Brandolini, Jim Subject: 92 Mayflower Terrace Attachments: inquiry on buildable lot.pdf; Lot plan stamped 92 Mayflower Terrace.pdf From: Kathleen MacNeil [mailto:kmacneilCc�mdaboston.com]Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 5:48 PMTo: 'Brandolini, Jim' deg/4-, ,,-' Cc: 'Cipro, Linda'; 'Sears, Tim' ft Subject: RE: 92 Mayflower Terrace Dear Mr. Brandolini—I am following up on an inquire made earlier this month with regard to 92 Mayflower Terrace. I have attached the stamped plan, the+/- is shown because it's a water boundary. The earlier lot inquiry required that this lot satisfy the minimum 10,000 sf wetland area. According to the engineers if that is the case they felt that with septic rules there would be no buildable area left. If that is the case, I am just looking to clarify and if it is not buildable get that determination and perhaps combine the lot with 88 Mayflower. Appreciate your guidance. Thank you, feel free to call me. Can I call the office with my credit card info for the $90 fee? Kathleen MacNeil Cell: 617-549-2478 kmacneil@mdaboston.com From: Brandolini, Jim [mailto:JBrandolinayarmouth.ma.us] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:20 PM To: 'Kathleen MacNeil' Cc: Cipro, Linda; Sears, Tim Subject: RE: 92 Mayflower Terrace Dear Ms. MacNeil: I have reviewed the information provided. My comments are a ows: -The 1947 subdivision plan depicts the fr feet,whereas the January 4, 2016 plan prepared by Feldman Land Surveyors, depicts the frontage to 8+/-feet. On the basis the lot contains less than the minimum frontage requirement of 75 feet, pursuant to Zoning Bylaw Section 104.3.4, Paragraphs 2 &5 and less than 50 feet as per Section 104.3.4, Para. 1, this lot does not qualify as a grandfathered parcel. However, I would require Feldman's plan to be stamped by the land surveyor of record and reflect the exact frontage. The plan reflects plus/minus symbols. -With respect to the minimum upland/non-wetland area as a disqualifier; as stated above, Zoning Bylaw Section 104.3.4 contains several provisions for determining whether lots are grandfathered. altof which, Para. 1, provides that a co^� yortetcontaining a minimum of 5,000 square feet of area and 50 feet of frontage and was not held in common ownership with any contiguous parcels, from the time it became non-conforming to the present, may quality as being grandfathered. Depending on the Surveyor's definitive frontage determination, should the lot contain 50 feet plus, and the ownership of the two adjoining lots continued to be in separate ownership from that of 92 Mayflower Terrace 1 ( ai-cerb4), iris possible this lot may be grandfathered for zoning purposes. Under this Zoning Bylaw provision, upland/non-wetland area minimum is not a requirement. Should you wish to pursue this matter further, I would need the stamped plan, the lot would need to contain a minimum of 50 feet of frontage and I would require an up to date Lot Inquiry form be submitted to determine up to date ownership of the three lots (88, 92, &96-Mayfbwer Terrace). The inquiry in question was submitted and determined made, in March, 2005. Currently there is a $90 fee to process this type of inquiry form. Finally, all the foregoing information is zoning driven. If it is determined the lot qualifies as being grandfathered, so called,the land and proposed construction would still have to comply with Title V, Conservation, and Old Kings Highway Historical District Commission requirements. Should you decide not to pursue this matter further, please advise and I will provide you with a letter citing the non-compliant zoning provisions. However, I will still need a stamped plot plan from the surveyor certifying the 48 feet frontage as being correct. Very truly, James D. Brandolini, Deputy Building Commissioner From: Kathleen MacNeil [mailto:kmacneilcamdaboston.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:33 PM To: Brandolini, Jim Subject: 92 Mayflower Terrace Dear Mr. Brandolini: We have done some preliminary engineering on a lot at 92 Mayflower Terrace, see attached email from Down Cape Engineering and the survey plan. It appears that the lot is not likely buildable by the time you avoid the wetlands and design a septic, etc. I wonder if you could issue a denial on the town standard form on buildability. The assessor suggested this form as we are currently being taxed as a buildable lot. Let me know your thoughts or if you need additional information. Thank you. Kathy MacNeil 617-549-2478 2 -17 frz , ( ticif :2 9 7641 I) BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY, THE PARCEL SHOWN HEREON LIES WITHIN A ZONE AE,ARES SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE IX ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD,WITH BASE ELEVATIONS DETERMINED AND A ZONE E' (SHADED),AN AREA WITHIN THE 0.2%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD,AS SHOWN ON THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MMNAC:EMENT AGENCY(F.EMA) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE AMP(FERN)FOR LARNSTABLE COUNTY,o AA.SS4CIIL/SET/S,MAP NUMBER 25001C0583J,HANNC AN EFFECTIVE b MA YFLOWE' TERRACE 7EOfJLYi6,201,. Q 2) THIS PLAN COMPILED FROM RECORD DEEDS AND PLANS. BOUNDARIES SHOWN MAY CHANGE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEIL' 8.493.00 L�80it .O0 H' 3TO) LOCUS PROPERTY MAY BE SUBJECTTOWN WETLAND BYLAWS. PLAN OF RECORD INDICATES DINAH'S POND IS PORE. ANY PANNED 0 \, / DOCKS OR PILINGS TO BE PLACED WITHIN MANS POND WILL BE J SUBJECT TO A CHAPTER 91 LICENSE. , / — �� - --fir 4 4 Now or Formerly i Now or Formerly Now or Formerly JEAN D'AiWTO 1 0 888 A[4YFLOWER LLC ii InN4LH9(EG REALTY TRUST BOOK 28550,PAGE 325 1 Y. BOOK 28869,PAGE 126 h�I BOOK 24073,PACE 280 MAP 119 LOT 64.1 S ASAP 119 LOT 64.2 `E A MAP 119 LOT 63 LOT 54 ARE4=13,000f SQ. FT � I in tt AIWOI/MATE EDGE ____ . — . — . j�(REC D LOG900N) �JI} COMPILED PLAN - 4: #92 MAYFLOWER TERRACE ' "ol " YARMOUTH, MASS. DINAH' 'OND FELDMAN LAND SURVEYORS JANUARY 4, 2017 (TIDAL) 152 HAMPDEN STREET PHONE: (617)357-9740 BOSTON, MASS. 02119 www.feldmansurveyors.com FELDf111F1r7 ,,�yZN�''``s LAND SURVEYORS •Arfy-PA01 i'�� 20 0 10 20 40 80 ',i FOIEY MI No./3355 �> MI M. _��i zo/?' r9A0'Essro"�oe SCALE: 1"=20' A�. //J PysuvR1 . '� RESEARCH FIELD CHIEF PROD MGR APPROVED SHEET NO. OF HAUL R.FOLEY,PLS( 355) PFOLEYOFELOMANSURVEYORS.COM CAC GADD FIELD CHEERIO COD FILE JOB NO. Er eNi r c\Le.n.h/w'^is. 1 T^P1.wlFYOWER-SYA o g