Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDMF commentThe Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (617) 626-1520 | www.mass.gov/marinefisheries MAURA T. HEALEY KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL REBECCA L. TEPPER THOMAS K. O’SHEA DANIEL J. MCKIERNAN Governor Lt. Governor Secretary Commissioner Director SOUTH COAST FIELD STATION CAT COVE MARINE LABORATORY NORTH SHORE FIELD STATION 836 S. Rodney French Blvd 92 Fort Avenue 30 Emerson Avenue New Bedford, MA 02744 Salem, MA 01970 Gloucester, MA 01930 March 5, 2025 Yarmouth Conservation Commission 1146 Route 28 South Yarmouth, MA 02664 Dear Commissioners: The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MA DMF) has reviewed the Notice of Intent (NOI) by Raymond and Harriet Fellows of the Raymond and Harriet Fellows Revocable Trust to license and maintain an existing rock wall, pier, gangway, and float within the Bass River at 222 Blue Rock Road in the Town of Yarmouth. The project was reviewed with respect to potential impacts to marine fisheries resources and habitat. The project site lies within mapped shellfish habitat for American oyster (Crassostrea virginica), northern quahog (Mercenaria mercenaria) and softshell clam (Mya arenaria). Waters within the project site have habitat characteristics suitable for these species. All of these species were found during a shellfish survey conducted by John Lowell of East Dennis Oyster Co. on October 24, 2024. Land containing shellfish is deemed significant to the interest of the Wetlands Protection Act (310 CMR 10.34) and the protection of marine fisheries. The project site overlies salt marsh vegetation. Salt marsh provides a variety of ecosystem services, including habitat and energy sources for many fish and invertebrate species [1-2]. The Bass River has been identified by MA DMF as diadromous fish passage, migration, and/or spawning habitat for alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus), white perch (Morone americana), and American eel (Anguilla rostrata) [3]. The Bass River acts as winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) spawning habitat. Winter flounder enter the area and spawn from January through May; demersal eggs hatch approximately 15 to 20 days later. The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission has designated winter flounder spawning habitat as a “Habitat Area of Particular Concern” (HAPC). In the previous stock assessment, the winter flounder stock was classified as overfished with spawning stock biomass in 2019 estimated to be only 32% of the biomass target [4]. Spawning stock biomass in 2021 was estimated to be 101% of the biomass target based on a new recruitment stanza focusing only on the past twenty years [5]. Given the new status of the winter flounder stock, every effort should be made to protect the species and its spawning habitat. MA DMF offers the following comments for your consideration: 2 • MA DMF conducted two field studies to assess the relationship between shading, marsh growth, and dock design; these studies collectively indicated that a height-to-width (H:W) ratio of 1.5:1 between the base of horizontal stringers and salt marsh reduced shading and marsh loss relative to the typically required 1:1 H:W ratio [6-8]. Current plans show a pier width of 4 feet and less than 4 feet of clearance between the lowest stringer and salt marsh. Current plans do not meet the 1.5:1 H:W ratio recommendation. MA DMF recommends establishing a minimum 1.5:1 H:W ratio for pier decking across the full extent that overlies the marsh by either raising the elevation of the decking height or reducing the decking width. • Grounded floats can disturb bottom sediments, resulting in turbidity and direct impacts to benthic habitat. To minimize impacts, MA DMF recommends that the bottom of a proposed float be at least 2.5 feet (30 inches) above the substrate over mapped shellfish habitat, at MLW [6]. The entire float does not maintain this minimum clearance at MLW. MA DMF recommends installing pile-supported float stops to maintain a 2.5 foot clearance above the substrate at MLW. • Any maintenance activities requiring a barge should be restricted to 2 hours before and after high tide to prevent barge grounding in mapped shellfish habitat. • Fuel spills from refueling of construction equipment will adversely impact sensitive resource areas. Impacts to resource areas can be avoided by prohibiting all land-based equipment from being refueled on-site. If equipment is refueled on-site, adequate containment and clean up material should be required to minimize impacts. Questions regarding this review may be directed to Amanda Davis at amanda.davis@mass.gov. Sincerely, Amanda Davis Environmental Analyst MA Division of Marine Fisheries cc: Daniel A. Ojala, Down Cape Engineering, Inc. John Logan, Kara Falvey, Holly Williams, Matt Camisa, MA DMF Casaundra Healy, Yarmouth Shellfish Constable Patrice Bordonaro, CZM References: 1. Deegan, L.A. and R.H. Garritt. 1997. “Evidence for spatial variability in estuarine food webs.” Marine Ecology Progress Series 147:31-47. https://doi.org/10.3354/MEPS147031. 2. Boesch, D.F. and R.E. Turner. 1984. “Dependence of Fishery Species on Salt Marshes: The Role of Food and Refuge.” Estuaries 7(4):460-468. https://doi.org/10.2307/1351627. 3. MA DMF. MassGIS Data: Diadromous Fish. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/massgis- data-diadromous-fish. Accessed February 8, 2023. 2023. 3 4. ASMFC. 2020. Southern New England Mid-Atlantic Winter Flounder 2020 Assessment Update Report. http://www.asmfc.org/uploads/file/6008bd822020_SNE- MA_WinterFlounderAssessmentUpdate.pdf 5. ASMFC. 2022. Southern New England Mid-Atlantic winter flounder 2022 Management Track Assessment Report. Compiled June 2022. https://apps- nefsc.fisheries.noaa.gov/saw/sasi.php 6. Logan, J.M., A. Boeri, J. Carr, T. Evans, E.M. Feeney, K. Frew, F. Schenck, and K.H. Ford. 2022. A review of habitat impacts from residential docks and recommended Best Management Practices with an emphasis on the northeastern United States. Estuaries Coasts 45: 1189–1216. https://www.mass.gov/doc/dock-bmp- recommendations/download 7. Logan, J.M., A. Davis, C. Markos, K.H. Ford. 2018. “Effects of docks on salt marsh vegetation: An evaluation of ecological impacts and the efficacy of current design standards.” Estuaries and Coasts 41:661–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0323-1 8. Logan, J.M., S. Voss, A. Davis, K.H. Ford. 2018. “An experimental evaluation of dock shading impacts on salt marsh vegetation in a New England estuary.” Estuaries and Coasts 41:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0268-4