HomeMy WebLinkAbout796 Rte 28 DRC Comments 081815 SIGNED with ApplicationReview is: ❑ Conceptual IN Formal ❑ Binding (404 Motels/R.O.A.D. Project) ❑ Non -binding (All other commercial projects)
Review is by: ❑ Planning Board 19 Design Review Committee
If this is a conceptual review, a formal review will be required before Site Plan Review.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
Meeting Date: August 18, 2015 _ _ Map: 33 Lot: 50
Applicant: Edward quirk (Silver Cloud Towing) Zones : 132IHM0131
Site Location: 796 Route 28
Persons Present:
DCR Members Present
Yarmouth Town Staff Present
Guests
Sara Jane Porter
KathyWilliams
Marie Caron
Dick Martin W11.41
Dan Speakman
Jack McCormack
Charlie Adams
DRC Review Started at: 4:06 PM Room B
DRC Review ended at: 4:58 PM
Project Summary
The Applicant (Silver Cloud Towing) is proposing to raze and replace the existing building (currently Cape Cod
Vacuum) and replace it with a 40'x90' vehicle storage building with no bathroom or office. This property is located
directly across Route 28 from their current location at 797 Route 28, The intent is to store their larger towing
trucks and avoid having to back into their current location from Route 28.
The proposed building is a wood structure, sided with T-111, and 8:12 asphalt shingle roof. There are four large
windows on the Route 28 side, along with a small covered area over a barn style door to replicate a front door
entrance. This will need to be modified slightly to provide only an 18" projection in order to meet zoning
setbacks. A third access is proposed off Blisscott Ave to allow for trucks to access both ends of the building.
There are currently curb cuts onto Angus Ave and Route 28. Eight parking spaces have been shown. The
existing sign will be removed and the site will have no signage. Infiltration basins for roof runoff have been
shown.
Marie Caron gave a short overview of the project and indicated that the office and cars will remain across the street.
Large windows from the existing building will be utilized along the Route 28 facade.
Review Comments In Relation To The Desi n Standards
SITING STRATEGIES
Sect. 1, Streetscape ❑ N/A x❑ Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
The new building is fronting along Route 28 with a 25' setback allowed for commercial corner lots per the Zoning
amendments from the 2015 ATM. Large windows with grilled transom windows above, and a small porch
projection and front door, have been provided along the Route 28 fagade to help create a street oriented fagade.
It would be preferable if the porch over the door could be more substantial and include support columns, but this
would encroach into the front yard setback.
Sect. 2 Tenant Spaces ❑x N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or I I Discrepancies:
Sect. 3, Define Street Edge 0 N/A 0 Meets Standards, or 191 Discrepancies:
The definition of the street edge is impacted by the number and width of the curb cuts. The Angus Ave curb cut
is being expanded to 50' and a new 35' curb cut is proposed off Blisscott Avenue and the existing Route 28 curb
cut is shown as remaining. Three curb cuts for a small lot is excessive. Recommend that the Route 28 access
on the property be abandoned and the pavement removed. Applicant should confirm they have the ability to
access off Blisscott Avenue which is a private road.
The applicant is proposing street trees along Route 28 which further defines the street edge. However, an
additional street tree should be provided in the island along Blisscott Avenue.
Sect. 4, Shield Large Buildings D9 N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect, 5, Design a 2"d Stoty 0 N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Sect. 6, Use Tow to Screen New Development ❑x N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or L I Discrepancies:
Sect.. 71 Landscape Buffers/Screenin ❑ N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies:
Adequate landscaped buffers and foundation plantings are shown along Route 28. The north side of the property
abuts a residential neighborhood and includes a wooden fence that is leaning in some locations and missing
some sections. Although there are some existing trees along the northern buffer not shown on the plans, there
are sections where the buffer plantings are missing or minimal. The applicant should replace/repair the wooden
fence and install supplemental buffer plantings along the northern property line, to be shown on the plans
submitted to SPR. Grass should be irrigated.
Sect,_8, Parking Lot Visibility ❑ N/A 0 Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies:
Parking area is relatively small and is in the rear of the property and screened with plantings.
Sect. 9, Break up Large Parking Lots N N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or i I Discrepancies:
Sect. 10. Locate Utilities Underground ❑ N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies.
Utilities to be underground, or seek relief.
Sect. 11, Shield Loadinq Areas Cx7 N/A i i Meets Standards, or i 1 Discrepancies:
BUILDING STRATEGIES
Sect. 1, Break Down Building Mass — Multiple Bld s. L I NIA U Meets Standards, or ❑ Discrepancies. -
The building is less than 5,000 sf in size.
Sect. 2. Break Down Building Mass_— Sub -Masses (M N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or L ] Discrepancies:
Sect. 3, Vary.Farade Lines ❑ N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies:
The building is rectangular in shape without changes to the fagade, roof lines or wall height. The small porch
overhang and door has been added to break up the fagade line facing Route 28.
Sect. 4, Vary Wall Heights ❑ N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies:
See Section 3 comment above.
Sect. 5 Vary Roof Lines ❑ NIA ❑ Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies:
See Section 3 comment above.
Sect. 6, Bring Down Building Edges ❑ NIA ❑ Meets Standards, or 0 Discrepancies:
See Section 3 comment above.
Sect. 7, Vary Building Mat'Is For Depth ❑ N/A ❑ Meets Standards, or I] Discrepancies:
Window trim should be 1 "x5" with 6" to 8" corner boards. Detail of the brackets for the front porch to be
provided to Town Planner.
Sect. 8, Use Traditional & Nat'l. Building Mat'Is I ] NIA I] Meets Standards, or I I Discrepancies:
The building siding is proposed to be T-111. The Applicant agreed to utilize cedar shingles on the two gable
ends and the Route 28 fagade, leaving the T-111 for the rear of the building.
Sect. 9, Incorporate Pedestrian -scaled Features I ] NIA M Meets Standards, or I I Discrepancies:
A small overhang and door have been included along the Route 28 fagade.
Sect. 10, Incorporate Energy -efficient Design i I NIA I] Meets Standards, or i 1 Discrepancies:
Next step for applicant: 9 Go to Site Plan Review i ! Return to Design Review for Formal Review
Read & Received by Applicant(s)
L I I
Town of Yarmouth
Design Review
Application
Date: 't' I 'I
f _
Review Date C4% S
Review Time: , y l��'1 LU�Vh48
HMOD2 Projects:
Abutter's List Provided
Advertised on --
Abutters notified on:
Applicant's Name: E DW GU v r �c _
Applicant's Address: q q rI iT -�_b Sa d �i' oUI-4
Applicant's Phone: So c6 -7 2 G 1-2 E) i Email: Sf 1 v -e v doud 797 Q CcoqCctS
Owner or Corp. Name (if different): G(-�-Pt C_0a V CLC iikG� r
Property (project) Address: ')Cl (v ZS
Assessor's Map/lot
Zoning District(S): 6 Z Flood Zone: A E 11
Engineer/Surveyor: D6NJ 5 r'E-A - M A-Y-
Architect. -
Project Description;
-P—Y-tsT
e a
1 A 4 ►.w_ Fl fort -C.i f-- S+Ie) kr cz a .P U' n I LI , M C)
Signature of Applicant Date:
YARMOUTH DESIGN REVIEW
MATERIALS SPECIFICATION SHEET
Provide color chips and or material samples where necessary.
Applicant:
Project ,� A (Z- Z�
Location:
Siding Type & Material(s): I Color(s): 6� eA
Roof Material & Pitch(es): Color(s): L-1-- T-°
Windows: ❑ Wood iX Other (specify) ���ss �' �h ktr�v��o��r� Color(s): w H-" R=
Doors: ❑ Wood KOther (specify)'-V-V)sJ\ctW MColor(s): LUh I
Trim Size: Windows & Doors ; Corner Boards ;
Soffits ; Rakes ; Fascia Color(s):
Trim Material: B Wood ❑ Other (specify) Color(s)9JK0-
Shutters: WoodNinyl/Other-Paneled/Louvered Color(s):
Gutters: ❑ Wood ❑ Other (specify) Color(s):
Garage Doors: Material; Size; Style 1 r J Su �-A- )E7D F-1 g ERALNZO Color(s): W � Lt
Decks And Railings: ❑ Wood ❑ Other (specify) Color(s):
Fencing: ❑ Wood ❑ Other (specify) Size: Color(s):
(Show Layout And Running Footage On Site Plan)
Retaining Wall(s): Pressure Treated/Fieldstone/Other
(Show Layout And Running Footage On Site Plan)
Signs: (Show On Plan) Size; Style Color(s):
Additional Information:
I LOCUS
PARKING CALCULATIONS
EMPLOYEES 8
RATE 112 EMPLOYEES
SPACES REQ'D 4
PROVIDED 8
SITE COVERAGE
BUILDING
3600 SF
PAVED
8489 SF
TOTAL
12089 SF
COVERAGE
62X
I.OPOSED S1 TE PLAN
LOCATION: 796-798 RT 28
MAP/PARCEL: 33150
PREPARED FOR: MARIE CARON/SILVER CLOUD TOWING
Njj���
OFSCALE: 1:20 DATE: 08-11-15
om
DAN A. SPEAKMAN CONSTRUCTION
SAX)
AKmm
ww LAND SURVEYING & TITLE V ENGINEERING DI V.
15 SPEAK WAY, N. HAR WI CH, MA
508-432-5565
I
i
T 0. ROOF RIDGE
__ ____________________________________..____-_____.---.____------------------------------------------------- __________________.___-------------------------------------- — ------------ _-----
—_—_______
------------------------ ______--------------------------------------------- ______--------- __------- _--------------- —------- --------------------------------------------- ----- ---------
------------------------
-------------------------- ASPlMLT FDOF Sn:Nctrs
.___________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________—_____—_____________-_________.___
TOPIATE.________________________________________________________________________________________________—____._..___.___._______________-. _______..-_
______________— _ ___ _
I _
INDFASOA 9D ON IC ROOPOVflnANG
N
Y I \I I $LAND'C44,lagrla 111C
� � I SIDING B' a/- VEROCAL pOAi9"
NIM
AIN NEWMT PICTURE N1NDDh5
TWJF�ONYi ABOV!
T 0 fWNO. WALL
I I I f I i I l I I o
W
FIN NEO GRADE I 6ff Y BO' FRONT DOORV:I SLIDING GRN DOOR EA SIDE
I
L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
proposed
SOUTH ELEVATION
1/4"= 1.-0,.
N
O
cn
(�0 �z
a
a
I $ 8
Y O S
IO
— � 7
N
Z Z
LD
GARAGE/SHOP +cam
]Trae'8' v r W a
W
0 � W
o
f O W
gx C U.
U.
2S qC yu Z z
01 Q
Wf a
9 a D:
J E. o
4 aa. O
Col.
-ul
a
a
DATE: 08110/2015
rl SCALE. AS NOTED
I I
I I DRAWNG x:
— — — — — — — J proposed
FLOOR PLAN Al - 2
114" = 1'-D"
FLYCO V.'NDO'AS
NY I a6 CA9 NG � 2' 91LL
12
3�
I 1.3 011 I.10 WV1 WARMTO PIAiE I I I
II II I
3.I9WOGOF 1,T000ROOY[R _________
YrtiM STRUCil1FA 01iACRLf5 _________
TOE
_______
� I
�
V1
O
N
W
14' . 14' 0 tt. GAYAGE COOK
TO. 1011.13 MLL
�
v
T.O. FOUNO YNLL
I
�
1
I , i
' ---------------------------------------------------LT J---------------------------------------------
------- I j
I
pNp
U
'
pEASrop
proposed
ca
T ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
o 3
Iva" = r-0°
1 /4" = 1 �-0.
w s
AU °z
w
TO ROOF RIDGE
Q
s
F
'
,n�
V
3N
O f
G
Ln
Sa
z
0
$W z
Ni w
c�Y
a w
I
I
_ ----------------------------------
--------------------------------- —------------------ —
DATE: 0811012015
proposed
NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: AS NOTED
DRAWING f:
114" = 1 -0'
A2-2
--