Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout25-D002 169 Route 6A Approved3; o TOWN OF YARMOUTH MAR 127025 1146 ROUTE 28, SOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664-4451 Telephone (508) 398-2231 Ext. 1292—Fax (508) 398-0836 Old King's Highway OLD KING'S HIGHWAY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMITTEE HistOric District IRMOUTH TOWN CLERK RE APPLICATION FOR 101Ay 13'25 Am10'30 CERTIFICATE OF DEMOLITION OR REMOVAL Application is hereby made for the issuance of a permit for the Demolition or Removal of a building or structure or part thereof, under Section 6 of Chapter 470, Acts of 1973. as amended, for the proposed work described below and on plans, drawings, or photographs accompanying this application. PLEASE SUBMIT FOUR (4) COPIES OF SITE PLAN AND PHOTOS ALONG WITH APPLICATION FORM AND ABUTTERS LIST. Tyne or print lealbly: Address of proposed work: 4 �� K �t (/p Map/Lot # �Z Z Owner(s) 1, % 1' Z. �L i h Phone #._ ! $' / g �r? - L `/ % All applicatWhs must besubmitted by owner or accompanied by letter fromm owner approving submittal of application. Mailing address: 3 1A,11 �ro ( /5�'rt `Y�"'�K��' r' ` � �jrear built r O-' Email. t~ ; �Wr e `` I Cro • Preferred notification method: US Mail it Agent/contractor: 6 . x / l ! s //���r rS / Phone #. S0� S�yy Mailing Address- 16 .'� .`7r Alp. S'o •, t h ,�,r 3 /y� ��-G +� Email. C,?.Oe w_r C ifs �_ 9 �, 0r �• GSM Preferred notification method: US Mail _4ef�fEmail Descrimlon of Proposed Work D D Z, Z pr 1. 40 / J G, ,d a ti iL /' r ,6 MAY 12 1015 Old King's Highway L* Signed (Owner or agent): Date ,.DSynit > Photos (4 sets) showing all sides of building MUST accompany application. > If building is to be moved, give new location. D If relocation is granted. Certificate of Appropriateness application is required if new location is within the Yarmouth OKH District. % Ownerlcontractorlagent is aware Ihal a permit is required from the Building Department. (Check other departments, also.) > If application is approved, approval Is subject to a 10-day appeal period required by the Act. > This certificate is good for one year from ap$rovai date or upon date of expiration of Building Permit whichever date shall be later For Committee use only:y Approved Approved with _modifications Denied Rcvd Dale:� Amount 66, CashlCK M jj� RL cvd by: , 5, 45Days: Date Signed: G� W02oa APPLICATION #- TOWN OF YARMOUTH OLD KING'S HIGHWAY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMITTEE 1146 ROUTE 28, SOUTH YARMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS 02664-4451 Telephone (508) 398-2231 Ext.1292 Fax (508) 398-0836 STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING CHANGES TO AN OLD KING'S HIGHWAY APPROVED PLAN As property owner/contractor/agent for construction at & A Map/Lot (9) 1191 CIA # 25--100;L- Approval Date:G' , I certify that I understand the following requirements regarding any changes that may be required for this project: In accordance with paragraph 2(a) of section 1.03(General Procedures) of the OKH 972 CMR Rules and Regulations: Only minor changes may be approved by the Committee without the filing of a new application and a new hearing. Minor changes include alterations that can be done without a detrimental impact on the overall appearance of the project such as altering a single window or door change or a minor change of colors. All minor changes by amendment will require the local Committee's or its designee's approval. All changes to previously OKH approved plans require notification to and approval from the local OKH Committee. Change requests must be submitted to the Committee in writing on the appropriate request form, which may be obtained from the OKH office. All change approvals must be obtained before incorporating the change into the project. If the change has been implemented prior to receipt of OKH approval, a Minor Change approval or Certificate of Appropriateness application for the revised plans is still required and will result in a doubled filing fee for the appropriate category of work. Failure to comply with the above statements will result in the Building Department issuing a stop -work order or delaying the issuance of an Occupancy Permit or final inspection approval. have read and understand the above statements. <1 Date: 2- Signed: - ZVI-,,,JLX , (OwnerlContractor/Agent) Signed: Updated 5131/2024 (Chairman, Old King's Highway Com�AD gfOA(jjjM MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District TOWN OF YARMOUTH ° 1146 ROUTE 28, SOUTH YARMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS 02664-4451 MAR ? 1 701.5 Telephone (S08) 398.2231 Ext. 1292 Fax (508) 398-0836 OLD KINGS HIGHWAY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMITTEE Historic King's Highway storic District tict WAIVER OF 45-DAY DETERMINATION T'he applicant/applicant's agent understands and agrees that due to the current declared National and State public health emergencies the determination of our Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness/Demolition/Exemption may not be made within 45 days of the filing of such application. "rhe applicant agrees to extend the time frame within which a determination is to be made as required by the Old King's Flighway Regional 1-lisioric District Act. SECTION 9 -Meetings, Hearings, Time far Making Determinations "As soon as convenient aftr such public hearing; but in rmy event within forty -fire (45) elays after the filing of application, or within such further time as the applicant ,shall allow in writing, the Committee shall make a determination on the application, " Applicant understands that the review of this application will be scheduled as soon as the situation allows. ,( Applicant/Agent Name (please print): t •Y �� r� 4z /` S ApplicantlAgeni signature: Date: /e ~ MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District 2 5 - D 002 312020 Application #: TOWN OF YARMOUTH OLD KING'S HIGHWAY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMITTEE Offin ABUTTERS' LIST MAR 1 2 7025 Old Kings Highway Applicant's (Owner) Name: CT rG �� Z ,r , ,�. ,, Historic District Property Address/Location: A 4c /,� Hearing Dater NJf 5► ��� Notices must be sent to the Applicant and abutters (including owners of land on any public or private street or way) who's property directly abuts or is across the street from the Applicant. Please Provide the Assessor's Tax Map and Lot numbers onl . The OKH Office will send out notices using the addresses as they appear on the most recent applicable tax list. Note: Instructions for obtaining the abutters Map and Lot numbers can be found on the Old King's Highway Department page on the Town website: www. armouth ma us Map Number Lot Number Applicant Information: / r yy b.5- Abutter Information. NEAT 12 7025 Old King's Highway Historic District / 7 d 2 5 — D 0 0 2 Application ff: 1221 1171 1 1 SEGARJOHN EPPEL CHERYL 21 MINDEN LN YARMOUTH PORT, MA 02675 1221 1201 1 1 173 ROUTE 6A LLC 231 WILLOW ST YARMOUTH PORT, MA 02675 1221 1211 1 GCB 169 ROUTE 6A LLC 231 WILLOW ST YARMOUTH PORT, MA 02675 1221 122r 1 ! GALVIN GERALD M GALVIN LAUREL R 165 ROUTE 6A YARMOUTH PORT, MA 02675-1713 1221 391 1 1 RGDC PROPERTIES LLC 168 ROUTE 6A YARMOUTH PORT, MA 02675 Please use this signature to certify this list of properties directly abutting and across the street from the parcel located at: 169 Route 6A, Yarmouth Port, MA 02675 Assessors Map 122, Lot 121 Andy Maces o, Director of Assessing March 28, 2025 MAR 287015 Old King's Highway Historic District MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District ;< "Ooo� Owners Authorization Letter Please print or type Statement of ownership 6A15 Name of Authorized Agent/Contractor Owners Signatu d 2/a -2�- MAR 1 17025 41d King's Highway Historic District MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District 2 5 - D 002 411 , , 7N 4p, Ap, - T doe 4iAW OML ILW T IL % A, AP -7 3k IP 25-1)00, MAR 12 2025 ow King's Highway Historic District mom ........................ MAY 102i Old King's Highway-:' Historic -District ,AL' 0 4;xj Wf At t 4 41� r A I po X7 It 25 0 Ah, JE JF de:it a Ld -46 p tw IV m -..AL 10 i MAY 12 2025 01d King' • ihway = Histod. 25- oo4 w f�� Z :$.does, ILA Ar. . . . . . . . . . . . . . hi r, F- \� G�� ||� 1,��� �: :f - - - -__ '! ■ r � �� , *�. 1 � -- .. � { .. t r � � � ~ 4 - � - ��� � a — �� off .- MAR t 2 7075 --told ing's Highway H -toric District sway Ct s.. r F t� r� f r_ i� h 4 r ` I Al r � r 2 2025 g's Highway ric District I � r 4F . ;, IL W - - dip — a' w 86 Ir lk n r 4 did King's H Histc�r� �� 1 orr-j— _% ra.d i v _ oft' ' rr 5{ q � 1 s rim! JA- 1F � _ v rr mm'i! L I 4w } 5 .,.raw.. ,�....=r. i t� m z IL ap6&44 M F CatalSR1W WgRo Architecture Interiors MAY 0 9 1025 May 8, 2025 Old King's Highway Robert Wilkins, Chairman Historic District Town of Yarmouth Old King's Highway Historic District Committee ("OKHDC") 1146 Route 28 South Yarmouth, MA 02664 �Tj 1 Via email: Isherman armouth.ma.usL MAY 12 2925 Re: 169 Main Street (Route 6A) Yarmouthport Old King's Highway Report on Existing Conditions of the Barn Historic District Mr. Wilkens, Catalyst has revisited the subject property to review the condition of the existing structure, we did so after the owner's contractor was able to remove the interior finishes and a minimal amount of thermal insulation to expose the remaining framing of the barn. I will start by saying we did not see what we thought we might see, as much of the framing in the building is relatively new. More specifically we did not see much of the original post & beam in the barn, and the few members that exist today look to be replacements. The oldest posts and beams are rough sawn and not hand hewn as the potential age of the structure might have suggested. Below I will share more about each portion of the building. The Foundation: I thing it goes without saying that the brick & stone foundation has failed and shows obvious signs of decay and settlement. Portions of the wooden sill beam have been removed and replaced in bits and pieces overtime, and the remaining sill shows heavy water and insect damage. The structural engineers report will share more concerns. The Exterior Walls: The walls are a mix of old posts, lateral purlins and infill of modern 2X studs. Several 8x8 post members damaged by insect infestation, have been partially removed and replaced with new posts (about 24-30 inches above the floor level). In many places the connections from purlin to post and post to sill are rotten or pulling apart. Newer framing was added to infill between old frame elements. The walls flex and move when I exert minimal force on them, which is an indication the building is weak and vulnerable. The walls are balloon framed up to the roof eave as was normal practice but have little to no 2 5 - D 0 0 2 capacity to resist the outward thrust created by the roof load above. Two small diagonal braces remain to stiffen the walls but they will not be adequate going forward. If a renovation was undertaken all of the exterior walls wood need to be systematically improved by removing the horizontal purlins and adding new continuous wood studs from the first floor deck up to the eave line, effectively rebuilding the walls from the inside. The exterior sheathing is vertical plank boards that are not adequate to provide br @ D a r`l i1 for the structure so these will also need to be removed and replaced with modern U U plywood sheathing panels. MAY 12 7015 The First Floor Deck: �t� Ki The first floor is relatively new (20-30 years old perhaps) with pressure treated joi t thin9 's Highway have been added to replace previously failed joists or to level the floor above the Histoflc District undulating foundation below. It appears that a previous renovation improved the floor frame and added a plywood floor deck from within the building. At that time additional piers and support beams were added in the crawlspace as well. The current floor system is no longer historic, but also needs to be removed and replaced. The Second Floor Deck: The second floor frame was a bit of a mystery until the gypsum board ceiling was removed from the ceiling coffers between old beams, however now we can see that the old post and beam members are very undersized and unsafe. Once again, a previous renovation inserted new era framing in-between the old barn beams and imposed loads on those beams that they were not intended to carry. The second floor is also accessed by a recently framed stair, constructed of standard 2x framing lumber. When I stepped onto that floor surface it deflected or bounced an uncomfortable amount. I am sure the consulting structural engineer will have more to say about this floor system. My concerns aside, there may three 4x6 rough sawn beam members, which stretch the full width of the structure, that may be reusable in a decorative manner within a future reconstruction project. The Roof: The roof framing looks to be old, but they don't look original; they are rough sawn 2x6 rafter members at approximately 32 inches on center. I was expecting to see the original post and beam members and roof purlins (similar to the wall construction). Therefore, believe the roof framing is also not original. Further it appears the latest renovation in the space which added finishes on the second floor also added 2x8 collar ties or ceiling joists at about nine feet above the second floor, these have been working hard to resist further settlement of the unsupported roof ridge, which has a subtle saddle shape. The Cupola: The cupola with louvered panels on four sides was difficult to assess form the second floor, but it appears the frame is intact, and the exterior envelope is more of a concern. As mentioned above the roof is settling which indicates the weight of the cupola is not 25- D 002 F Catal Architecture Interiors adequately supported by the structure below. New work will have to be added or replaced below the cupola and ensure that gravity and wind loads are supported. In conclusion, the barn needs much more than a new foundation. The majority of the wall, floor and roof systems need full replacement. The building code will also impart many requirements on this project. Given that the work will exceed 50% of the area of the entire structure the building code will consider this a reconstruction, and current codes will apply to new elements that are added. All of the new building frame elements will need to meet current code, and must be compliant with current wind zone bracing requirements The new energy code will also requ=re substantial insulation that can no longer be accommodated within the old barn wall stud or roof rafter cavities. Catalyst is confident in the end that Mr. Bilezik;an and his contractor will build a replica of the barn that wil3 3ook as handsome as the old barn did in its heyday. The new building will look the same, with the same siding, similar windows, and a faux barn door similar to the existing. It will be the same size, the same height, but it will also be structurally sound and energy efficient. Finally, the new barn will provide a much needed housing unit in the Yarmouthport village. Please call my office any time with any questions. Sincerely, Kurt E.Raber Vice President 1 Principal Architect Cc: Greg Bilezikian, Owner Atty. John W. Kenney Atty. Patrick R. Nickerson Christopher Weeks, Contractor Brian Walsh, CSE (structural eng) MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District 2 5 - D 00 2 Catal Yteriors 5 March 5, 2025 Yarmouth Old Kings Highway Historic District Committee 999mm o Li h c/o Lisa Sherman, Historic Office Administrator Yarmouth Town Hall MAR 12 2025 1146 Main Street (Route 28) South Yarmouth, MA 02664 Old King's Historic District Highway RE: Barn at 169 Route 6A Deteriorated Conditions Make Renovation Impossible Dear OKH Committee Members, Catalyst Architecture/ Interiors, Inc. has reviewed the existing conditions uncovered after some explorations found that the old barn frame is in very poor condition, and had been altered substantially in previous attempts to repair rot and settlement of the structure. Where most of the structural will need to be removed and replaced, the original plans for a subtle renovation are not physically of fiscally possible. Further the thin fabric of this structure would need to be completed rebuilt to meet new energy code requirements trigger by the scope and cost, as well as the change in use form commercial to residential use. Sincerely, MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Kurt E.Raber Historic District Vice President / Principal Architect Cc: Chris Weeks, Contractor Lisa Tzellas, Turtle Rock 25-D002 Sherman, Lisa From: Richard Chwastiak <rhwastiak@capesymphony.org> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 4:53 PM To: Sherman, Lisa Subject: Letter of Support for 169 Route 6A, Yarmouth Port - Barn Reconstruction Importance: High Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Attention!: This email originates outside of the organization. Do not open attachments or click links unless you are sure this email is from a known sender and you know the content is safe. Call the sender to verify if unsure. Otherwise delete this email. Dear Ms. Sherman, I hope this message finds you well. My name is Richard Chwastiak, and I am an abutter to the property located at 169 Route 6A in Yarmouth Port, residing at 161 Route 6A. I am writing to express my support for Mr. Greg Bilezikian's application to the Old King's Highway Committee regarding the proposed reconstruction of the barn on his property. Given the poor condition of the existing structure, I believe Mr. Bilezikian's plan to replace the barn — maintaining the same footprint and height as the original —is a responsible and thoughtful approach. The project will not only enhance the appearance of the property but will also contribute positively to the overall character of the neighborhood. I respectfully encourage the Committee to approve Mr. Bilezikian's request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Rich Chwastiak Manager, External Affairs 2235 Iyannough Road West Barnstable, MA 02668 774.470.2282 x110 rchwastiak@capesym phony. orq N gly i E I flE IN _1 MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District TO APR 797.07i Old Kings Highway Historic District From: = i-ffma To: 5bibrimm Subject: 169 Rte. 6A Date: Monday, April 28, 2025 12:06:08 PM Attention!: This email originates outside of the organization. Do not open attachments or click links unless you are sure this email is from a known sender and you know the content is safe. Call the sender to verify if unsure. Otherwise delete this email. Lisa, This is Justin Manning. We own 179 Old King's Highway. Just wanted to let you know that we fully support Bilzekian's revitalization of 169 Route 6A. It helps out the entire village with his capital improvements. Any questions, feel free to call me at 508-274-4846. Thank you. Sincerely, Justin J. Manning, CAI, AARE President JJManning Auctioneers rw.JJManning.com 800-521-0111 x223 (at 1st prompt) Fax: 508-362-1073 Excellence In Real Estate Auctions Since 1976 MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District APR 7 B 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District Sherman, Lisa From: Wesley Price <wesley@wdprice.com> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 3:25 PM To: Sherman, Lisa Subject: Support letter for razing and rebuilding the barn at 169 Route 6A Yarmouth Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Attention!: This email originates outside of the organization. Do not open attachments or click links unless you are sure this email is from a known sender and you know the content is safe. Call the sender to verify if unsure. Otherwise delete this email. Hi Lisa, Please accept this email as an abutter's support of razing and replacing the barn at 169 Route 6A Yarmouth. I reviewed the barn's condition. It has significant structural flaws that reveal piecemeal and shoddy workmanship over the years, including foundation failure, notched and cut support beams, sill rot. A replacement of this structure would maintain and enhance the aesthetic of the village and create a safer, more durable structure for future residents. Respectfully, Wesley Wesley D. Price President W.D. PRICE, Inc. 5087447352 17742122942 wesley@wdprice.com ® wdprice.com 161 Main Street, Yarmouth Port, MA. 02675 MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District APR 2 5 Z05 Old King's Highway Historic District Wood Destroying Insect Inspection Report Notice: Please read Important consumer information on page 2. Section i. General Information Company's Pest Control Business Lie. No. Date of nspe: tion Inspection Company, Address & Phone 15/1/2025 Fowler and Sons, Inc Address of Property Inspected 347 West Main Street, Hyannis, MA, 02601 169 ROUTE 6A (508) 771-5008 YARMOUTHPORT, MA, 02675 Inspector's Name, Signature & Certific tion, Registration, or Lic. # Slructurels) Inspected Chuck Fowler 17463 � Barn Only I Section II. Inspection Findings This report is indicative of the condition of the above identified structure(s) on the date of inspection and is not to be construed as a guarantee or warranty against latent, concealed, or future infestations or wood destroying trisect damage. Based on a careful visual inspection of the readily accessible areas of the structure(s) inspected: eA. No visible evidence of wood destroying insects was observed. B. Visible evidence of wood destroying insects was observed as follows- 1. Live insects (description and location): Active powder post beetle noted to floor joists in crawl space 0 2. Dead insects, insect parts, frass, shelter tubes, exit holes, or staining (description and locat-on� Powder post beetle frass noted on sills and floor joists in crawl spa, e Powder post beetle exit holes noted to frame work on interior of structure. Q 3. Visible damage from wood destroying insects was noted as follows (description and location) Powder Post Beetle damage noted to s-ll plates in crawl space NOTE. This is not a structural damage report. If box B above is checked, it should be understood that some degree of damage, Including hidden damage, may be present. If any questions arise regarding damage lnd'catedbythis report, itisrecommended that the buyerorany interested parties contact a qualified structural professional to determine the extent of damage and the need for repairs. Section III. Recommendations ❑ No action andior treatment recommended: (Explain if Box B in Section II is checked) 0 Recommend action(s) and/or treatment(s) for the control of: Powder post beetles Section IV. Obstructions and Inaccessible Areas The inspector may write out obstructions The following areas of the structure(s) inspected were obstructed or inaccessible: or use the following optional key: ❑ Basement l.Fixeciceiling 1S Standing water ls ❑ Crawpace 2. Suspended ceiling 16.Densevegelabo^ 3.FFxedwall covering 1I.Exterior siding ❑ Main Level 4.Floorcovering 18.Windowwell covers ❑ Attic 5.Insulation 19.Woodpile 6.Cabinetsorshelving 20.Snow ❑ Garage 7.Stored hems 21. Unsafe conditions ❑ Exterior 8.Fumishings 22. Rigid foam board ❑ Porch 9. Appliances 23. Synthetic stucco 10. No access or entry 24. Duct work, wiring, and/or ❑ Addition 11, Limited access plumbing 12. No access 25. insulation ❑ Other quipmeent 13.0ayvisualaocess 26.E 14. Cluttered condition Section V. Additional Comments and Attachments (these are an integral part of the report) Moisture in crawl space should be controlled. Attachments Signature of Seller(S) or Owner(s) if refinanc ng Seller discloses to the Signature of Buyer. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of a buyer all information, to their knowledge, regarding W.D.I. infestation, damage, copy of both page 1 and page 2 of this report and understands the information repair, and treatment history. reported. X X Form NPMA-33 (Z 01119) 0 2019 National Pest Management Association All Rights Reserved Na reproduction of this form is permitted without the express permission of NPMA Previous editions are obsolete after 12/31 r 19 This form is approved for FHA and VA loans Page 1 of 2 MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District VED MAY 0 5 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District =MR Important Consumer Information Regarding MAY 12 7025 the Scope and Limitations of the Inspection Old Kjng's Highway Please read this entire page as it is part of this report. Please refer to the NPMA Suggested Guidelines # ifiGc l*tompleting this report. This report is not a guarantee or warranty as to the absence of wood destroying insects nor is it a structural integrity report. The inspector's training and experience do not qualify the inspector in damage evaluation or any other building construction technology and/or repair. About the Inspection: A visual inspection was conducted in the readily accessible areas of the structure(s) indicated (see Page 1) including attics and crawlspaces which permitted entry during the inspection. The inspection included probing and/or sounding of unobstructed and accessible areas to determine the presence or absence of visual evidence of wood destroying insects. The WDI inspection firm is not responsible to repair any damage or treat any infestation at the structure(s) inspected, except as may be provided by separate contract. Also, wood destroying insect infestation and/or damage may exist in concealed or inaccessible areas. The inspection firm cannot guarantee that any wood destroying insect infestation and/or damage disclosed by this inspection represents all of the wood destroying insect infestation and/or damage which may exist as of the date of the inspection. Fornurnoses of this inspection. wood deshoyinginsects include: termites carpenter ants. carpenter bees, and rei fest' ood boring keetles. This inspection does not include mold. mirlefew 9L noninsect wood destroying o anisms. This report shall be considered invalid for purposes of securing a mortgage and/or settlement of property transfer if not used within ninety (90) days from the date of inspection. This shall not be construed as a 90-day warranty There is no warranty, express or implied, related to this report unless disclosed as required by state regulations or a written warranty or service agreement is attached. 2. Treatment Recommendation Guidelines Regarding Subterranean Termites: Treatment or corrective action should be recommended if live termites are found. If no evidence of a previous treatment is documented and evidence of infestation is found, even if no live termites are observed, treatment or corrective action by a licensed pest control company should be recommended. Treatment or corrective action may be recommended if evidence of infestation is observed, and a documented treatment occurred previously, unless the structure is under warranty or covered by a service agreement with a licensed pest control company.> For other Wood Destroying Insects, please refer to the NPMA suggested guidelines for added guidance on actions and or treatment. 3. Obstructions and Inaccessible Areas: No inspection was made in areas which required the breaking apart or into, dismantling, removal of any object, including but not limited to: moldings, floor coverings, wall coverings, siding, fixed ceilings, insulation, furniture, appliances, and/or personal possessions; nor were areas inspected which were obstructed or inaccessible for physical access on the date of inspection. Your inspector may write out inaccessible areas or use the key in Section IV. Crawl spaces, attics, and/or other areas may be deemed Inaccessible if the opening to the area is not large enough to provide physical access for the inspector or if a ladder was required for access. Crawl spaces (or portions thereof) may also be deemed inaccessible If there is less than 24 inches of clearance from the bottom of the floor joists to the surface below. If any area which has been reported as inaccessible is made accessible, the inspection company may be contacted for another inspection. An additional fee may apply. 4. Consumer Maintenance Advisory Regarding Integrated Pest Management for Prevention of Wood Destroying Insects. Any structure can be attacked by wood destroying insects. Homeowners should be aware of and try to eliminate conditions which promote insect infestation in and around their structure(s). Factors which may lead to wood destroying insect infestation include: earth to wood contact, foam insulation at foundation in contact with soil, faulty grade, improper drainage, firewood against structure(s), insufficient ventilation, moisture, wood debris in crawlspace, wood mulch or ground cover in contact with the structure, tree branches touching structure(s), landscape timbers and wood decay. Should these or other conditions exist, corrective measures should be taken in order to reduce the chances of infestation of wood destroying insects and the need for treatment. S. Neither the inspecting company nor the inspector has had, presently has, or contemplates having any interest in the property inspected. Form NPMA-33 (7101119) 0 2019 National Pest Management Association All Rights Reserved. No reproduction of this form is permitted without the express permission of NPMA Previous editions are obsolete after 12131/19. This form is approved for FHA and VA loans. Page 2 of 2 MONSOON] r & Termhe, Pet! and Turf (r!4 Management �r MAY 0 5 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District APPOINTMENT RECORD INVOICE TURTLE ROCK LLC 231 WILLOW ST YARMOUTHPORT, MA 02675 Purchase and Sales Inspection - Initial Service Charge, Inspection NOTES Will send report in a follow up email. If you have any questions regarding today's service, feel free to contact me directly. Thank you for choosing Fowler and Sons. Have a Great Day! chuckfowlerfowlerandsonsinc.com (508) 221-0179 - Cel I phone For any scheduling concerns please call the office (508)771-5008 347 West Main Street Hyannis, MA, 02601 508-771-5008 Invoice # 544624 InvoiceAmount $95.00 Service Date May 1, 2025 Account# 182831 Tech & License # Chuck Fowler #17463 Service Address : 169 ROUTE 6A Did you know that we offer Lawn Fertilization, Wildlife Removal and Tick Control? Call today for a free inspection and evaluation. Do you want to pay your Fowler bill online? http://fowlerandsonsinc.briostack.com/customer You can even store a credit card on file for pay as you go, or autopay. PRODUCTS USED Visual Inspection 1 TARGETED PESTS 1-Powder Post Beetles AREAS TREATED 1-Attic, 2-Crawl Space 1, 2 $95.00 0 units 1 $95.00 MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District APPOINTMENT PHOTOS A T: . IMG 5825.jpeg A IMG 5823 jpeg Please include Invoice# or Account# on your payment so we may apply to the correct account. TURTLE ROCK LLC Current Amount Due: $95.00 Due Date: May 31, 2025 Account#182831 Invoice #544624 Amount Enclosed $ Please note that if paying by check, we may process the check by Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Send Payments To Fowler and Sons Inc. 347 West Main Street, Hyannis, MA, 02601 Pay Online fowl erandsonsinc.briostack.com/customer/index.htrnPbranchId=10001 Pay by Phone 508-771-5008 MAY12 2075 Old King's Highway Historic District May 2, 2025 Old Kings Highway Historical Committee MAY 0 5 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District Re: 169A Rt. 6A; Yarmouthport, MA Greetings, In my capacity as a Licensed Construction Supervisor, and as a resident of Yarmouthport, Mr. Bilezikian asked me to review the structure at this address and lend my opinion as to the viability of saving and restoring the structure into a residential dwelling. Having spent a bit of time exploring the structure and crawlspace below; I believe it makes little sense to attempt such an effort. At the very minimum the building will need to be lifted and a new foundation installed below, As part of that one would most definitely replace the floor assembly as it is badly degraded and unsound. Once we accept this as obvious, which it is, I would then examine the remaining elements of the building with an eye toward what is necessarily going to be replaced, which would undoubtably include all exterior trim, siding, windows, etc. I would then consider what structural elements within need to be replaced or supplemented, which is nearly all of it, given the requirements of the Building and Energy Codes. Once all of this is considered, it begs the question; what is really remaining. The answer is "not much". I recommend razing the building and approving anew structure that architecturally honors the history and aesthetic of the neighborhood. Sincerely, MR@ _a, ////j�'J ✓ �,- le MAY 12 1025 George Davis, president Old King's Highway George Davis Inc. Historic District DESIGN BUILD RENOVATE 11 NORTI I MAIN STRIFT, SOUTI I YARMOUTI I, MASSACI 111SFTTS 02664 508.194.0832 508 194.5460 FAX 143 ROUTI- 6A, ORI I A,NS, MASSA(:HUSETTS 026.53 774.807.2848 774 801.2852 FAX GeorgeDavislnc.com COOPERATIVE EXTE VICE D O UN I� GE QF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND ENVIRONMENT, LEXINGTON, •'� U UNIVERSITY OF MAY 12 2025 KENTUCKY' MAY7��5 Collcgc of Agriculture, Food and Environment Powderpost Beetles O!d King's Highway Old Ktng's Highway By Michael F. Potter, Extension Entontol45t0ric ❑'Strict Entfact-r,48 Historic District University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Powderpost beetles are second only to termites in their ability to damage dry, seasoned wood. And yet, customers often receive conflicting opinions about whether the insects and/or damage they are seeing is indeed due to powderpost beetles. Mistakes also are made in determining whether the infestation is active, and if so, how it should be managed. As a result, the pests may cause considerable confusion for homeowners, wood suppliers, manufacturers, builders, and even pest control companies. This publication explains how to make those determinations. Types and Habits "Powderpost beetle" is a term used to describe several species of small (1;`8-3:`4 inch long) insects that reduce wood to a flour -like powder (Figure 1). The developing grub -like larvae inflict damage as they create narrow, meandering tunnels in wood as they feed. Tunneling and larval development take place entirely below the wood surface. Infestations typically are discovered after noticing powder, accompanied by small, round "shot holes" in the wood surface. These are exit holes where adult beetles have chewed out of the wood after completing their development. Newly emerged adults mate and lay eggs on or below the surface of bare, unfinished wood. The eggs hatch into tiny larvae that bore into the wood, emerging as adults one to five years later, usually during late winter, spring or summer depending upon species. Customers are more likely to see damage, rather than the beetles themselves, because the adults are cryptic and active mainly at night. Occasionally, the beetles may be found near damaged wood, or on windowsills since some are attracted to light. The three most destructive groups of powderpost beetles are the lyctids, anobiids, and bostrichids. Each group contains several species capable of damaging wood materials. Fig. I a-b: Powderpost beetles produce small round holes accompanied by wood powder. Lyctid powderpost beetles are small (1/16-1'4 inch), narrow and elongated, reddish -brown to black beetles (Figure 2). Their emergence holes are round and about the size of a pinhead. The powdery dust feels like flour or fine talc, and often accumulates in small piles beneath or beside emergence holes. Lyctid powderpost beetles attack only wood products manufactured from hardwood (broadleaf) trees such as oak, ash, walnut, hickory, poplar or cherry. Consequently, infestations are often associated with flooring, paneling, molding, window and doorframes, and furniture. Lyctids do not normally infest structural building components (studs, joists, beams, etc.) since these usually consist of non -vulnerable softwoods (con ifers`evergreens). Tropical hardwoods are especially prone to lyctid infestation because of poor storage and drying practices before importation. Articles made from bamboo are commonly infested as well. Plywood fabricated from hardwood veneers may be attacked, but damage is usually confined to the hardwood layer in which eggs were initially laid since the larvae tend to avoid glues and resins. Construction plywood (used for subfloors, sheathing, etc.), is made from softwood and is unsuitable for infestation by lyctids. V Itlrw■.1 *� �� lowtttttttt�� W © M.F. Potter L 4� Fig. 2a-b. Lyctid powderpost beetles. The powder is the consistency offlour. =MD MAY 12 2025 2 After emergence and mating, female beetles locate susceptible wood to lay eggs. Ten to 50 eggs per female are inserted into the tiny pores and vessels of unfinished wood. Surfaces that are stained, varnished, waxed or painted are immune from attack (although larvae already within infested wood may emerge through finished surfaces). Also avoided are softwoods such as pine. Before depositing eggs, female lyctid beetles "test" the suitability of wood for the larvae, which require starches and sugars for development. If the starch content of wood is insufficient (less than about 3 percent), the females will not use it for egg laying. Lower starch levels also make it harder for the larvae to complete their development. In newly seasoned wood with abundant nutrients, egg to adult development occurs in less than a year. Conversely, as wood ages, starch content declines and development slows to the point where some beetles may not emerge for two or more years if at all. Consequently, infestations eventually cease and die off even without intervention an important factor when weighing treatment options (see `Managing Infestations'). Small numbers of beetles developing within wood may continue to emerge for up to about five years. This is due to diminished suitability of the wood rather than from new infestation. Homeowners should be aware of this possibility. Lyctids have less stringent moisture requirements than other types of powderpost beetles. Infestations can persist in wood with a moisture content as low as about eight percent, a common occurrence in indoor, temperature - controlled environments. However, in drier wood (less than 10% moisture) maturation of larvae is prolonged, due to declining starch content. As noted earlier, lyctid beetles typically start emerging from wood within a year of processing. Thus, infestations usually are encountered in new homes or newly manufactured articles. In almost all cases, infestation results from wood that Old King's Highway Historic District contained eggs or larvae at the time it was brought into the dwelling. This is significant because responsibility for treatment or replacement often resides with the supplier, manufacturer, or installer, rather than the homeowner. The infested article probably was constructed from wood that was improperly dried or stored. Although lyctids sometimes infest firewood, this is seldom the reason other materials become infested within a home. Bostrichid powderpost beetles vary in size depending on the species. Most associated with wood products are reddish -brown to black beetles ranging in length from 1/8-1/4 inch. Compared to lyctids, bostrichids are less narrow - bodied and flattened, and the head is oriented downward, appearing somewhat "hooded" (Figure 3). Many species also have tiny, roughened, rasp -like protrusions behind the head, and some have a pair of projecting spines at the end of the body. Bostrichids create circular 1.'8- Il4 inch holes in wood like other powderpost beetles. Female beetles have the unusual habit of boring directly into wood in order to lay eggs. These holes are devoid of powder. Conversely, holes formed by beetles upon completing their development are packed with powder. Wood powder produced by bostrichids is more meal - like than lyctid powder and tends to remain tightly packed in the holes and feeding galleries of the larvae. Bostricid powderpost beetles are more serious pests of hardwood than softwood. There is little risk to softwood framing within homes. Similar to lyctids, bostrichids usually attack newly processed woods with high starch and moisture content. Tropical hardwoods (including bamboo) are especially vulnerable to attack, which often occurs prior to importation. Although bostrichids seldom re -infest wood after the first generation emerges, extensive damage can occur the first year due to a high initial population and rapid development. © M.F. Potter 00 ON. Milo rs Photo Fig. 3a-b: Bostrichid powderpost beetles have a `hood like' appearance up by the head. Anobiid powderpost beetles are convex, reddish to dark brown beetles capable of attacking both hardwoods and softwoods. They are sometimes confused with drugstore and cigarette beetles that also occur in homes but infest stored foods. The emergence holes are 1.1fi-1 +8 inch. Rubbed between the fingers, the powder sifting from the holes and accumulating in small piles may feel gritty (although for a few species attacking hardwoods this is not the case). Unlike the powderpost beetles discussed previously, anobiids can seriously damage beams, joists, and other structural components of buildings. Anobiids prefer to infest moist wood. A 13-30% moisture content is required for development of the larvae. Consequently, infestations are most severe in damp crawl spaces, basements, garages, and unheated outbuildings (Figure 4). Buildings with central heating and cooling seldom have sufficient dampness to ++�J� development in living areas or � , � 3 MAY 17 702.9 Oic` Kirg's Highway Historic District Anobiid infestations occur throughout much of the country, but are more common in the southeastern and coastal states where humidity and temperature are high and crawl space construction is abundant. Unlike lyctids and bostrichids, anobiid powderpost beetles can digest the cellulose within wood, and are less dependent on starch and other nutrients that decline over time. This allows them to attack and infest wood regardless of age. In Europe, for example, some species of anobiids continue to infest wood in buildings that are centuries old. Larval development occurs slowly, exceeding 2- 3 years if conditions are suboptimal. As a result, infestations are seldom obvious in buildings less than 10 years old. Although damage occurs slowly, the ability of emerging beetles to re - infest wood year after year can lead to serious problems requiring treatment and repair. r Mom Myere Photo Fig. 4a-b: Anobiid powderpost beetles infest damp areas such as crawl spaces. Emergence of adult anobiids generally occurs during the spring and summer months. In nature, they dwell in dead tree limbs or bark -free trunk scars. The adults are strong fliers and some are attracted to lights. Infestations within buildings may originate from infested lumber, firewood, or from beetles entering from outdoors. Mistaken Identities Many similar -looking beetles that are not powderpost beetles may occur within buildings. It is important to know the difference to avoid confusion and ensure that costly treatments and repairs are not made unnecessarily. Definitive diagnosis usually requires confirmation by an entomologist or knowledgeable pest management professional. As noted previously, powderpost beetles are sometimes confused with other small brown or black beetles infesting stored food items (flour, cereal, grains, seeds, nuts, spices, pet/bird food, etc.). Examples include flour beetles, drugstore and cigarette beetles, weevils, and merchantrsawtoothed grain beetles. These pests typically occur near stored food items in kitchens, pantries, etc. Another pest group often mistaken for powderpost beetles scavenge on surface molds associated with damp conditions. One of the most common is the foreign grain beetle (Figure 5). These beetles are small (about 1 16-inch long), brownish, and abundant, with large numbers often observed throughout the building. The key characteristic to look for in identifying this beetle is the presence of a slight projection or knob on each front corner of the shield -like segment directly behind the head. A microscope or other means of magnification is necessary to see this characteristic. Foreign grain beetles are one of a group of beetles that feed on molds and fungi growing on poorly seasoned lumber or wet plaster and wallboard. They often are a problem in newly built homes. When new homes are constructed, microscopic surface molds form on damp wood and sheetrock, which in turn attracts the beetles. In older homes, fore' rain beetles may be associated with Otgul condensation problems, or 4 MAY 7 2 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District None of the beetles in this category damage wood; once the moisture condition is resolved, the surface molds disappear along with the beetles. (For more on this pest, see University of Kentucky Entomology Entfact-610). Fig. 5: Foreign grain beetles are often mistaken for powderpost beetles (note the two small 'knobs' just behind the head). Is the Infestation Active? Powderpost beetle infestations often die out of their own accord. Therefore, it is important to know whether the infestation is active or inactive before taking action. Active infestations usually have powder that is the color of freshly sawed wood sifting from the exit holes. Compared to old, abandoned holes, new holes will not have taken on the weathered appearance of the surrounding wood (Figure 6). If flooring, cabinetry, etc. were previously stained, new emergence holes will have no traces of stain inside the holes. If accumulations of powder appear yellowed, caked, or covered with dust or debris, the damage is probably old. Careful observation may be required to distinguish new powder from powder dislodged out of old larval galleries by vibrations. Another way to confirm that an infestation is active is to mark or seal any existing holes, sweep or vacuum up all powder, and recheck the wood for new holes and powder later on. Since most beetle emergence occurs in spring or summer, you may wish to wait until then to determine if new holes and fresh powder are present. This makes particular sense when attempting to determine whether an infestation is active during fall or winter. Fig. 6a-b: Active versus inactive infestations. The former usually have fresh powder accompanying the emergence holes. Managing Infestations Clients should know that there are a few different options for controlling powderpost beetles. Choosing the best approach depends on such factors as degree of damage, potential for re - infestation, and expense both financial and emotional that one is willing to bear. Powderpost beetles damage wood slowly. There is no need to act immediately for fear of risking the structural integrity of one's home. A "wait and see" approach often makes the most sense, especially when there is uncertainty whether the infestation is active. Prevention— Powderpost beetles, especially lyctids and bostrichids, typi"gg,m in lumber or manufactured a cabinetry, molding, pa 5 MAY 7 1 2025 0 . ° ,ring`s Highway ` . i• J. foric District Infestation occurs after wood is sawn into lumber and then sits in storage, or during transit and distribution. It is prudent for wood manufacturers to inspect incoming shipments for signs of beetles before they turn them into finished products. Wood that is suspect should not be used, especially if fresh emergence holes or powder is present. Many of the most serious infestations occur from using old lumber from a barn or woodpile to panel a room or build an addition. Powderpost beetles lay their eggs only in bare, unfinished wood. Surfaces that are stained, varnished, painted or otherwise sealed are generally safe from future attack. Beetles emerging through such coatings were usually in the wood before the finish was applied. Although beetles emerging from finished wood can potentially re -infest by laying eggs in emergence holes, sealing the holes prevents this possibility. Wood Re lacement- Oftentimes, indications of beetle activity are limited to small sections of flooring or a few pieces of molding, trim, etc. The most efficient approach is often to remove and replace them, along with any boards or pieces directly adjacent as a precaution (Figure 7). Fig. 7: Replacing small settions of damaged wood can be an effective means of control. This is especially true when the damage is due to lyetids or bostrichids. As noted, these powderpost beetles have a difficult time re - infesting wood after emerging indoors since, at that point, most surfaces are finished and starch and moisture is declining. When replacing sections of flooring, difficulties sometimes arise in matching the finish of the existing floor. If this is the case and the entire floor needs to be sanded and refinished, it is often prudent to wait at least six months in case more holes appear and additional boards need replacement. Lethal Temperatures- Before wood is used for construction or manufacturing, most of the water is removed by air -drying or kiln drying. Kiln - dried lumber is heated for a period of hours to a temperature of about 125-140°F. This is sufficient to kill all stages of powderpost beetles that might be in the wood prior to heating. However, even wood that is properly kiln dried may become infested during subsequent storage and transit. The longer wood sits in a vulnerable condition, the greater the chance beetles will find and lay eggs on the lumber. The pest control industry also uses heat to treat dwellings and furnishings for bed bugs. While it would be difficult to kill wood -boring beetles in `built in' components like floors and cabinets, de -infestation of furniture and similar objects may be possible within a heat chamber. Pest control firms use stationary and portable heat chambers of various sizes. Temperatures employed or for powderpost beetles would be similar to those used for bed bugs (I20-135" F), although exposure times might need to be longer, e.g., up to 24 hours, depending on wood thickness. Powderpost beetles can also be killed by placing smaller items such as wood carvings and picture frames in a deep freeze (0°F) for 3-7 days, again depending on wood thickness. For more on this topic, see University of Kentucky Entomology Entfact-640 Thermal Dein estation of Household Items. vMM@ 6 MAY 12 2025 Old King'n Highway Historic i--;strict Moisture Control- Anobiid powderpost beetles in particular have high moisture requirements for survival. Wood moisture below 14 percent during spring and summer are generally unsuitable for development. Therefore, it is advisable to install a moisture barrier in damp crawl spaces that are infested. Covering the soil with polyethylene sheeting reduces movement of moisture into the substructure and reduces the threat of the infestation spreading upward into buildings. Other ways to lower wood moisture content in crawl spaces is to improve drainage and increase air circulation by installing foundation vents. Moisture meters utilized by pest control firms are handy tools for measuring the moisture content of wood and predicting the potential for infestation (Figure 8). Fig. 8: Moisture meters are useful tools for predicting potential reinfestation. Residual Insecticides- Various insecticides are used to treat beetle -infested wood. Insecticides known as borates are most widely used for this purpose. Borate sprays have the potential to penetrate and kill beetles within wood, as well as those entering or exiting the wood surface. Depth of penetration will depend on wood moisture content; the damper the wood, the deeper the borates will penetrate. Two different formulations are used, Bora-Care and Tim-bor. Both products are virtually nontoxic and odorless. For borates to penetrate the wood surface must be unfinished; the spray will not penetrate paint, polyurethane, or other water repellent coatings. For this reason, the products have limited use for treating infestations within the living areas of homes. They are most often used for control and prevention of anobiid powderpost beetles infesting joists, beams, sills, studs, and other structural elements of buildings. Borate sprays are sometimes used to treat beetle - infested hardwood floors, which first requires sanding to remove any finish. Besides being costly and disruptive, such treatments are seldom necessary since emerging lyctids and bostrichids are unlikely to re -infest. Additionally, in temperature -controlled buildings the moisture content of wood flooring tends to be around 10%. Borate penetration into wood this dry would be minimal and likely would have little effect on developing larvae. Fumigation- Fumigation is an extreme and costly option for ridding a building of powderpost beetles. Homes undergoing fumigation are sealed with tarps and occupants must remain out for about three days. The concentration of gas is monitored and maintained at a specified level, and before being reoccupied, the building is ventilated. Current fumigants containing sulfuryl fluoride are less effective against wood -boring beetles than those containing methyl bromide, which is no longer available. Consequently, de -infestation may not be successful. Structural fumigation may be warranted when infestations (typically of anobiids) have spread into walls, between floors, and other areas where access for surface treatment or wood removal is impractical. The best way to avoid such problems is early detection and one or to actions mentioned earlier "tws 7 MAY 12 2025 '-)Id Ki cg's =-Iig-hway Historic D,slrict furniture can be fumigated more effectively and at substantially lower cost than fumigating an entire building. Infested items are placed under tarps or in trailers or vaults to maintain gas concentration at the proper level. Some pest control companies offer this service to customers. In Summary Discovering powderpost beetles can be very concerning to homeowners. It is important to diagnose the problem correctly in order to avoid unnecessary effort and expense. Confirmation of the type of beetle, and whether the infestation is active are crucial first steps. Other considerations 8 include location and extent of the infestation, and the type, age, moisture content, and condition/surface finish of the wood. Since powdetpost beetles damage wood slowly, take time to consider the options available for remediation. Revised: 6'18 CAUTION: Some pesticides mentioned in this publication may not be legal in your area of the country. If in doubt, please consult your local cooperative extension service or regulatory agency. Furthermore, ALWAYS READ AND FOLLOW LABEL DIRECTIONS FOR THE PRODUCT YOU ARE USING. Images copyright University of Kentucky unless otherwise attributed. MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District Christopher Weeks Builder /Owner/Operator WEEKS On The Cape 163 Airline Road South Dennis, MA 02660 May 9, 2025 Old Kings Highway Historic District Committee moup Attn: Robert Wilkins, Chair 1146 Route 28 MAY 12 2025 South Yarmouth, MA 02664 Via email: Isherman@Yarmouth.ma.us Old King's Highway Historic District Dear Mr. Wilkins and Members of the Old Kings Highway Historic District Committee: MAY 1 v 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District My name is Christopher Weeks and I am the owner and operator of Weeks on the Cape. My business specializes in renovating, remodeling, and constructing additions to residential and commercial buildings. I have 25+ years of residential and commercial building experience, and I am familiar with the rules and procedures of the OKHDC. In my professional experience, I have assisted in the restoration and renovation of historic barns and a historic windmill. I am writing in support of the application to demolish and rebuild the barn located at 169 Route 6A Yarmouth Port MA. On February 6, 2025, 1 submitted an application to raise (lift) and rebuild the barn. After conversations with Lisa Sherman, the proposal was specified to raising (lifting) the barn and constructing a new foundation underneath, setting the barn onto the new foundation once complete. I estimated that approximately 12" to 15" of the new foundation would be visible facing Route 6A. The Application was approved administratively without a public hearing. A copy of the approved Application and emails are attached hereto as Exhibit A. I anticipated completing interior work (not within the purview of OKHDC) before raising the barn. The interior work included demolishing interior drywall, removing and installing a new first floor of Trus Joist I-beam or TA's along with Y4" Advantech plywood. I commenced the interior demolition work after obtaining OKHDC approval and after obtaining appropriate permits from the Building Department. As interior demolition began and was ongoing, the exterior framework was revealed to be mostly "relatively new" wood in a highly questionable condition. I estimated that less than 10% of the interior frame was original wood, and that most of the original wood could not be reused due to its deteriorating condition. I expressed to Mr. Bilezikian that in my opinion it was not feasible to raise the barn, construct a new foundation and new first floor, and set the barn back onto the new foundation. I expressed that multiple issues were revealed by the interior demolition and that, in my opinion, demolition and rebuilding a "like -for -like" structure was the only feasible option at this point. 25-D002 Mr. Bilezikian and Kurt Raber, our architect on the project, agreed with my assessment. A architectural plan set were drawn up by Mr. Raber, showing a nearly 100% "like -for -like" new barn. A small change was made to the rear gable, that is not visible from Route 6A. After the plans were completed, a pre -filing meeting was held with the building commissioner of Yarmouth Mark Grills, the secretary of the ZBA, and the secretary of The OKH. After the meeting, I filed formal applications to demolish and rebuild the barn. These applications were submitted on March 12, 2025, and are included in your materials. At the OKHDC meeting on April 14, 2025 and the Chairman Robert Wilkins commented that the roof and sides of the barn looked "straight" from afar and that he and OKHDC members wanted to see the barn in person to determine if it was salvageable. A site visit was held at the barn on April 22, 2025, and members of the OKHDC toured the barn. I overheard OKHDC members comment that we had already done a lot of work with newer materials; that the roof and sides of the barn looked "straight"; and even though the barn had a lot of newer materials in the interior, it still looked nice from the outside. I want to make clear for the record that I have not done any unauthorized work on the barn, and that I have not added any "new" components to the interior of the barn during the interior demolition work. Additionally, the roof and sides of the barn are not "straight". Upon hearing the OKHDC members' comments during the site visit, I used a laser level to demonstrate that the barn is far from level and square. I took pictures of the laser level in the barn, attached hereto as Exhibit B. Many of the original components (less than 10%of the interior) cannot be reused. Finally, since the new proposed barn is nearly 100% "like -for like" with the exception of the rear gable that is not visible from Route 6A, the new barn will preserve the current aesthetic and streetscape while complying with current building and energy codes. Sincerely, sm;�p MAY 1 ? 2025 /s/Christopher Weeks Old King's Highway e-signed with assistance from P.R.N. Histodc ❑iStdct Christopher Weeks Builder/Owner/Operator WEEKS On The Cape 163 Airline Road 2 5- D 0 0 2 41.4 Exhibit A TOWN OF YARMOUTH MMN 1146 ROUTE 28, SOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664-4451 Telephone (608) 398-2231 Ext. 1292-Fax (508) 398-0836 FEB 1 02025 OLD KING'S HIGHWAY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMITTEE Id King's Highway rARNOUTH TOWN CLERK RE APPLICATION FOR Historic District EB F13'25AMG:52 QER11FICATEOF�N _E EMPTIO Application is hereby made for the issuance of a Certificate of Exemption under Sections 6 and 7 of Chapter 470 of Acts of 1973, as amended, for the proposed work as described below and on plans, drawings, or photographs accompanying this application. Tvoa or crint iealblr. Address of proposed work- /C� /yGt u / Mapllot # zze�/ Owneft : 6�4 i X "' k " Phone 0: 9/ All appllcatlo must be subm"I by owner_ /or accompanied tfer from owner approving submittal of application. Mailing address: 23/ �J / ,9w f7 r+ -,/-- Year bull: / g'J_`O_ _ Email: /'C % `Olc f Preferred notion method: Phone '—Email Mailing Address: so ..0 Phone #: y Email: w& r 1i! &P h► o �. C a AV Preferred notif etlon method: Phone IV V __ pp /i t y . s SCC•, T+"B h /`o eels: /�a'3 C/%�'��iiA/!i�' GCr-fc/' • �r,Pq ,�sr� . � s 1`�re ?� � , e t� � s `��r � �� �.��' �, /7'� 0 P �(Ce ci ' , •� I Signed (Owner Or agent): _ Data: > Ownerlcontredorlagerd is aware that a permit maybe required from the Building Departnsenl. (Check other departments, also.) I > This certificate is good for one year from approval date or upM4004wW Rrjq&w ry Permit, whichever date shall be later For Committee use only: Date: 0 Amount. w _ CadVCKd: C24h _ Rrvd by L• 5, �0yw�" ul B0 M 0 Approved MA oild I changes Reason for denial: Old King'-, Hjgf sway Historic District Old King's Highway Date Signed 5� Signed /" �,44 OW? AP,4L&FI01&: vs sor7 0 ) -D 002 ' Sherman, use From: Robert Wilkins sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 8:33 AM To: Sherman, Lisa subject: Re: 25-E007 169 Route 6A Attention!: This email originates outside of the organization. Do not open attachments or click links unless you are sure this email is from a known sender and you know the content is safe. CaU the sender to verify if unsure. Otherwise delete this email. OK approved On Feb 11, 2025, at 1:52 PM, Sherman, Lisa <LShermanC&yarmouth.ma.us> wrotVAY 12 2025 Hi Bob, Old King's Highway Historic District I heard back from the contractor for 169 Route GA: There will be nothing exposed on the North side of the builditVoKstreet view like now. And on the sides it will be 12 -15 inches of parged cement. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Thanks Bob, ARMOUTH Ati-ERK RE FEB 13'25 AN0:52 FEB 15 2025 From: Robert Wilkins Historic District Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 202510:21 AM To: Sherman, Lisa <LShermangyarmouth.ma.us> Subject: Re: 25-EO07169 Route 6A Attention!: This email originates outside of the organization. Do not open attachments or click links unless you are sure this email is from a known sender and you know the content is safe. Call the sender to verify if unsure. Otherwise delete this email. I have two questions: How much of the new foundation will be exposed (height from the ground, i.e.), and what will the visible material be? p.s. It's surprising how many synthetic materials are green, vinyl among them! A7- v , �5-D 002 On Feb 11, 2025, at 9:00 AM, Sherman, Lisa < @Yarmouth.ma-us> wrote: Hi Bob, Interesting note about Trex! Good to know. For the barn, he is going to raise the barn and add a foundation underneath. That's all - no other changes. rl talked to him specifically about that to make sure that is the extent of the barn project. Let me know if you have any additional questions. OR" Thanks Bob, FEB 13 2025 Lisa Old King's Highway Historic District From: Robert Wilkins Sent: Monday, February 10, 2025 3:55 PM To: Sherman, Lisa <lshermanPyarmcuth.ma use Subject: Re: 25-E007169 Route 6A Attention!: This email originates outside of the organization. Do not open attachments or click links unless you are sure this email is from a known sender and you know the content is safe. Call the sender to verify if unsure. Otherwise delete this email. Hi Lisa, The decking isn't a problem. In fact, in consideration of the new legislation that urges us to "give great weight" to alternative, green building materials, I 09@m� found this out about Trex: "Trex is considered a green product as it is made from 95% recycled material. The company that produces it is a member of the US Green Building Council and has employed green principles for over 20 MAY 12 2075 years." Old King's Highway However, I do have concerns about the barn, most importantly, what exactly Historic District is meant by "rebuild barn." Taken literally, that would require a demolition certificate, followed by a COA for the "rebuild." If they separate the deck from the rebuild, I will grant the exemption. Z 12 %- EG ` 2 5 - D 002 1 t-11 Bob On Feb 10, 2026, at 10:21 AM, Sherman, Lisa <LShBrmen yarrtmouth.rna.us> wrote: Hi Bob, Resident would like to replace decking on the side and rear of the house and raise the barn to add a foundation at 169 Route 6A. Please let me know if you need any additional information. _?J Thanks Bob, Lisa MAY 12 2029 Old King's Highway Historic District Lisa Sherman Town of Yarmouth Administrator, Old King's Highway Historic District and Yarmouth Historical Commission 508-398-2231, ext.1292 L&bstman6yarmouVLvw,,us FEB 13 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District 25-D009 i FEB 13 2025 f E8 10 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District MAY 12 2025 Old Kings Highway Historic Distract E 0 0 7 Old King's Highway Historic District 2 5 - D 0 0 2 . I? -IV �+ 444 �am+,''`�' fit It i 4a j ' Fa ►�.r�� jj; i i a' 1F fv�y ail;# 1 I I i I #L� -tip FEB 10 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District I IMIR. @ �VEI FEB 13 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District &moz- MAY 12 2025 Old Kina's Flic?hu�� 2 5 - E 0 0 7 2 5 - D 002 ..f 7— Co ro/' %� .�So is / S � ,7� r, < "iD) MAY 12 2025 1 G Highway Historic District FEB 13 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District FEB i o T015 n3 s Flryh;,;�y Historic District 2 5 - E 0 0 7 25-D002 \ 4 '4 GL Y Ll {� Y /Z �F zl�7 & m mo)L� � MAY 12 2025 old King's Highway f71-wu // �," FEB 15 2025 FEB 10 2025 Old King's Highway ;;' ;, � ''`' ;hway Historic District Histum- D,:liric-t 25--E007 W 25-D Opa a k ham ib No I !41 1 L�j .x '": �'ri��r*C •.+.��,i'�s !'[4.�;4 f 'i; fGmC•' �••'•P'�'L?� i,,-„��!+4 �,•�i.>•.:��g.s,ti� 7j*�*r .. s+Sy f�. � �Y yu�,, v � i.� .::i�!;`•�;�•,- ::�t:1 •f:Y• t j7�*.tr vI'�1.'-- t-�� ar '�� y //� !s r //f, a� yt,, !.S .'�� �i �j� ��wti,tit.:x <:����.f• 4�4?L�- �il' C �LJ'�+.�''1�:. I'f:t.a..��i�. i1 1 k'4,::,�lrilri �ti'�ijw .i.�. L r, b5".t!�!s �,-y3?• �}:�ILLww'� Exhibit B MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District 2 5 - D 0pt A MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District -25-D 002 r .. imp MAY 1 7. 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District 25-D002 ::lik,4 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, INC. 336 Baker Avenue 978-461-6100 Concord, MA 01742 www.cse-ma.com May 9, 2025 Robert Wilkins, Chairman Town of Yarmouth Old King's Highway Historic District Committee ("OKHDC") 1146 Route 28 South Yarmouth, MA 02664 c/o: Kurt Raber, Catalyst Architecture/interiors, kurl catalystarchitects.com RE: Structural Observation Report Detached Barn Structure 169 Main Street (Route 6A) Yarmouthport, MA Mr. Wilkens, MAY 0 9 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District CSE 06296 This report summarizes the findings of the structural observation Consulting Structural Engineer, Inc. (CSE) conducted on May 7, 2025, in and around the detached barn structure located at 169 Main Street in Yarmouthport, Massachusetts. Specifically, we conducted a walk-through visual observation of the wood framing and foundation_ The goal of the observation is to provide our professional opinion regarding the current structural condition of these elements. BACKGROUND The barn is a stand-alone, detached structure on the referenced property. The building contains two framed floors over crawl space approximately 24-feet x 24-feet in footprint area. We understand the barn was constructed circa 1900 and renovated over the years to create more modern habitable spaces and to correct damage encountered. Barn Structure BUILDING CODE REFERENCE mmwrlil�_illll MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District The structural condition is evaluated in accordance with the International Residential Code (IRC) 2021 as amended by the Massachusetts State Building Code, 101" edition Chapter 51 (MSBC) known as the Massachusetts Residential Code. The IRC Appendix AJ Existing Buildings and Structures directs those dangerous conditions encountered "where the stresses in any member; the condition of the building, or any of its components or elements or attachments; or other condition that results in an overload exceeding 150 percent of the stress allowed for the member or material in this code" shall be "made to comply with the applicable previsions of the MSBC' as 2s- n 00 f- CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, INC. Structural Observation Report UD pNfA4��Dd MAY i 7 2025 per section AJ149.4 of the MSBC. The analysis performed for this report i_Nriove threshold as the basis for recommendations related to dangerous conditions a &pia FINDINGS Histonc District General The barn is vacant at the time of observation and interior finishes have been removed throughout each floor to expose the framing members for review. The structure has been substantially modified at the first floor framed level, the second floor framed level, and the exterior walls. Modifications include the significant presence of modern dressed lumber as opposed to original timber framing. Additional beam and joist framing has been introduced heavily throughout the framed floor levels to the extent that the subfloor sheathing is modern plywood on modern framing set to level above and around any original framing that may still exist. The foundation is not in a serviceable condition and significant deterioration of wood framing members is present at the first floor framed level. The structural load path is supported almost entirely by modern framing reinforcements installed in place of or as reinforcements to original timber framing. Foundation The perimeter foundation walls consist primarily of 2-wythe (S-inch thickness) brick masonry walls over dry -stacked field stone. The rear section of the foundation wall has some concrete masonry unit (CMU) wall sections at access openings. Newer concrete foundation wall infill has been placed within the threshold of the front barn door. Interior foundations are cast -in -place concrete pads installed during a past renovation and placed on various stone and masonry rubble. North foundation wall in crawl space. _ Supporting soils at the base of the wall are eroding, the wall has been pushed inward from the force of _ exterior grade and hydrostatic - forces. Interior footings in this area are precariously supported by piles of masonry stone/rubble. E t North foundation wall along exterior. Wall is out -of -plumb, the base of _ foundation wall has been pushed 2 _ - inward from the surcharge of exterior ' grade and hydrostatic forces. w Sill timber has significant deterioration from moisture exposure and insect activity. Layers of modern first floor framing evident above sill timber. Page 2 of 10 2 5 - D 00 2 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, INC. November 14, 2017 Structural Observation Report Typical interior foundations within crawl space. Concrete pads are present at interior 3 post supports beneath the first floor i beams. Some are founded on soils, some on masonry stone/rubble. ,.r. Many interior foundations are unstable, and posts are out of plumb as a result. No mechanical anchorage is present to secure posts in place. South foundation wall along exterior. Wall is out -of -plumb, the base of foundation wall has been pushed 4 inward from the surcharge of exterior grade and hydrostatic forces. Concrete foundation wall infill present within barn door threshold on front wall. P MAX 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District Page 3 of 10 9S-v 002 . 4MI CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, INC. November 14, 2017 Structural Observation Report 6 First Floor Framina Rear foundation wall. Cementitious parge coating on the exterior conceals CMU patch work around each access opening. The first floor framing is supported by three (3) beam lines equally spaced under the floor spanning from side -to -side. The center beam is 6x6 likely original, the flanking 4x8 beams to the left and right of the center beam are reinforcements installed at the mid -span of first floor joists during a past renovation. 6x6 posts are located along each beam approximately 5-feet on center. First floor framing general layering of original framing, modern framing and reinforcing beam lines. 7 All interior posts are modern 6x6 lumber on modern concrete footings. f , Newer 2x4 purlins have been installed across the original 3x5 joists in significant areas of the floor. g Where this is done the original wood ` plank subfloor has been removed. MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District Page 4 of 10 25-D002 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, INC. Structural Observation Report 9 November 14, 2017 3x5 purlins bearing on 6x6 center beam line. Deterioration from exposure to moisture and insect activity is common throughout the first floor level. Second Floor Framing The second floor framing is almost entirely modern 2x8 lumber framing set level and framed around the original 3x5 purlin framing. The floor is supported by a 6x6 centerline beam supported by each side wall and two (2) interior 6x6 posts. 10 Front section of second floor framing. 2x8 joist framing throughout. The 3x5 purlins are spaced at 4-feet on center and provide support of the the 2x8 floor framing 4-feet off the front wall 3x5 purlins supporting 2x8 framing 4- feet off the front wall. Analysis demonstrates that the 3x5 purlins are overstressed beyond the 150% threshold. 11 MAY 72 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District Page 5 of 10 25--D002 '`° CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, INC. November 14, 2017 Structural Observation Report Damage observed 3x5 purlin at front wall. The horizontal split is the result of the 12 end notch in the purlin and the overstress condition due to support of the W floor frame system. x. y 6x6 centerline beam supporting the second floor. k Analysis demonstrates that the 6x6 13 centerline beam is significantly overstressed beyond the 150% f threshold. t No suitable header is present above the rear slider. An observable sag is present above the door due to 14 loading. Analysis demonstrates that the 4x6 { timber above the slider is overstressed beyond the 150% i threshold. I D D �II1111t/14�1111 vv� MAY 17 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District Page 6 of 10 2s- D 002 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, INC. November 14, 2017 Structural Observation Report Roof Framinu The roof framing consists of 2x6 full sawn rafters spaced at 32-inches on center. No ridge beam or ridge board is present. Modern 2x8 collar ties are added in the upper third of the roof at each rafter. No attic level or rafter ties are present at the side wall top plate level. A single timber kicker brace is present approximately mid -span of each side wall. Rafter and collar tie configuration. No ridge board present. 15 1 Rafter bearing on side walls, kicker brace approximately mid -span of wall. No rafter ties present at wall top 16 plate all thrust resisted by the single timber post in wall and kicker brace. Modern 2x4 stud wall present inside original exterior wall aiding in rafter ft i r°'11 support. Observed separation of kicker brace approximately 2-inches due to outward thrust of roof framing pulling 17 the brace from the floor. x � 1 } * MAY 12 2025 a Historic District Page 7 of 10 2 5 - D 00 2 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, INC. November 14, 2017 Structural Observation Report --= Observable bow along eave line _ = related to the outward movement of rafters due to inadequate rafter tie. 18 Observable sag in the roof plane at center area and sag in ridge line related to the outward movement of 19 rafters due to inadequate rafter tie. Exterior Walls All exterior walls are substantially reinforced with modern 2x4 studs to carry gravity loads down to the foundation. The stud reinforcements are spliced at the original 3x6 horizontal timber girls at each gable end and along the first floor side walls_ The horizontal length of these original girls are approximately 12-feet on the side walls and up to 24-feet on the second floor gable end walls. 0 Typical gable end wall on second floor. 2x4 stud infill framing between horizontal girts. The 3x6 horizontal girt along the top of windows spans the full width, approximately 24-feet in support of wind loading on the face of wall. MMDD MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District Page 8 of 10 25-DOQ2 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, INC. November 14, 2017 Structural Observation Report Old King's Highway PROFESSIONAL OPINION Historic District Consistent with the observations presented above, it is our professional opinion that all structural systems of the building (roof, walls, floors and foundation) require significant reinforcement or replacement. The original structure and subsequent reinforcements cannot safely support the required loads in its current condition as follows: • The roof lacks the support of a ridge beam or adequate rafter ties to properly support roof loads. • The second floor framing relies on undersized beams (6x6 centerline) and purlins (3x5 front section purlins) for support. Analysis demonstrates these elements to be classified as dangerous, observed damage to the purlins at the front wall support is consistent with the analysis. • The first floor suffers from significant deterioration from past exposure to moisture and insect damage. Past repairs have been spliced in and around the floor to address damage but do not comprehensively replicate an intact structure at this level. Interior post supports within the crawl space are out -of -plumb in most cases due to foundation conditions. • Foundations lack suitable support of the ground in areas where erosion has compromised the base of foundation walls and exterior surcharges have rotated the base of the wall inward. Similar circumstances at interior footings supported precariously on masonry stone/rubble piles. • Exterior walls are inherently flexible in their current configuration that depends on long - span horizontal girts to resist wind forces on the wall. In addition, and as the reinforcing studs are spliced at these girls in most locations, any vertical loads carried through the Page 9 of 10 2 5 - D 00 2 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, INC. November 14, 2017 Structural Observation Report girls may induce out of plane movement of the girls resulting in inadequate support for the floors and roof above. Contemplating reinforcement of all primary structural systems within the building superstructure and complete replacement of the foundation is not a reasonable path to a code compliant and safe structure in our opinion. We recommend complete demolition of the structure and reconstruction with new code compliant structural systems to match the existing building. LIMITATIONS The observations and recommendations made in this report are based on one walk-through, visual observation of the barn structure and foundations. The work carried out to date and the information presented in this report is representative of only the areas witnessed during the observation. As a result, it cannot be assumed that this report identifies all structural deficiencies, specifically those portions of the structure which are concealed and not presently observable. Please contact the undersigned to review conditions exposed during any work related to the recommendations made in this report in the event assumptions made in this report differ from actual conditions encountered, We reserve the right to amend this report should additional information become available. Please feel free to contact the undersigned if you have any questions or would like to discuss our findings in more detail. Sincerely, DF r9�}yz % f BRIAN A WALL i GTRUCTURAL .Marx A r A. Walsh, PE4 .o Managing Director CONSULTING STRUCTURAL BAWalshc$_ ma.c_o_m (978) 300-3041 Cc: Greg Bilezikian, Owner Atty. John W. Kenney Atty. Patrick R. Nickerson Christopher Weeks, Contractor MAY 12 2025 Old King's Highway Historic District Page 10 of 10 2S-D002 _ OLD KINGS HIGHWAY (ROUTE 6A) 19 �— -- — M-M r l y Q mo k e i y M. (r_ fj wrN k Inc' T m N o f (� ra .+ s. f 3 I � fin i a A m g J �g m n At cn r 1 $ v ; 4 'e q a My mks i� 0 'r Fn z �h' gg D �`' ■y� fjC $R TjR N6- pam _ m O G # b N Ci yN A Q ^ L / axe x # + C w5 C, /\\\ al NA V Z� `/ ; s �yZ 0 fJ \\ i y x g g K i m 8 n0 't R o� 21 O 7f �R�'. GApI 'I mf n I\ I O ! z I I � >pZNO'7I g g n s m ss �� a » n1 m I ilk �a r I I � 8 o// R ;4 65� zp I 1 Zi P n Qm 3 ® 19 ®® I I 6 mi mw Ban §� p Ila z _ N O � p � m � iii • • • r , mm Kz#�,y f9 `•,/ ": �j a of N k 3 � � \ � ��• 7 �nm I n Gi z i �^ all g a .::ti:' J ••••� p< .1 , NUso Fn ago~ sag,,,-1-0 �� -tea b sA ago 0 Hall 0z aall lung I z w A I � � m g g cam =gym ®®0 "g� a ��, �Aa° z`a g 7C mm€ �" m w7��Z1 T�Z r s: p T n �, m � m m o Q Rq u8t��iNSi-�ZI1Ri3NY ��2r�Isa8�8� od g� s r � H as g s 0 I��{ WIN 9 co p o ���� v o v�� ooii