Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResponses to engineering comments (07-16-2025) 112 State Road / N. Dartmouth MA 02747 Tel: (508) 858-5040 / Fax: (508) 858-5041 / www.choubahgroup.com July 16, 2025 Ms. Brittany DiRienzo, Conservation Administrator Yarmouth Conservation Commission 1146 Route 28 Yarmouth, MA 02664 Re: Proposed Gasoline filling station with convenience store, a drive thru & residential apartments 1272-1276 & 1282 Route 28 Yarmouth, MA 02664 Applicant/Owner: Ekaterina & Family, LLC 1282 Route 28 Yarmouth, MA 02664 CEG# 20-586 Dear Ms. DiRienzo, Attached please find revised Plans and revised Stormwater Report and supporting documents for the proposed gasoline filling station and residential apartments at 1272 -1276 & 1282 Route 28. Revised Plans and supporting documents are to address Peer Review comments dated June 27, 2025, by Comprehensive Environmental Incorporated (responses to comments are in Bold italic below each comment). Stormwater Comments: 1. The development proposes three subsurface infiltration systems designed to completely infiltrate runoff generated from the 100-year storm event, however, the following assessments must be performed to ensure the system will function properly: a. Test pit must be performed at the location and soil layer of all proposed infiltration systems to confirm infiltration capacity. A test pit was not performed at the location of System #1 or #3. The systems locations have been adjusted and moved as close as is practical to the location of the test pits for systems 1 and 2. Proposed System 3 is in proximity of the existing fueling pad and fuel tanks. It is not feasible to perform a test pits as the gasoline filling station is still operating. The test pits for this system is approximately 25’ feet from the system. A total of 7 test pits were performed within this small site, soil profile and infiltration rates were consistent for all test pits across the board in all locations. We do not anticipate any changes to ground elevation or soil infiltration rates. In addition a note has been added to the drainage plans for the design engineer to inspect bottom of all infiltration systems during construction and to confirm groundwater elevation and soil infiltration rates are consistent with design values and to make any adjustment to the systems if needed. b. A mounding analysis is required when the vertical separation from the bottom of an exfiltration system to estimated seasonal high groundwater is less than four (4) feet and the recharge system is proposed to attenuate the peak discharge from a 10-year or higher 24-hour storm (e.g., 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, or 100-year 24-hour storm). The average separation to estimated seasonal high groundwater is just below 4 feet (El. 16.11) based on the test pits provided. The bottom of the stormwater chambers for System #1, 2, & 3 is at El. 20.00. Bottom of all infiltration systems were raised to elevation 20.15 to provide 4 feet of separation from groundwater elevation at 16.11. A mounding analysis is no longer needed (refer to revised plans and stormwater report). c. Note, per the Yarmouth Stormwater Regulations, the estimated seasonal high groundwater elevation must be adjusted using the Cape Cod Commission adjustment method (Technical Bulletin 92- 001, as amended) in areas to be used for stormwater infiltration. Mottles was used to establish high groundwater elevation (EL. 16.11) and therefore no adjustment is needed per the Cape Cod Commission adjustment method (refer to test pits data). 2. Per the Yarmouth Stormwater Regulations, redevelopment projects must achieve 50% total phosphorus (TP) and 30% total nitrogen (TN) removal in addition to 80% TSS removal from all impervious area under post-construction conditions. Please document how the project meets TP and TN removal requirements in the Stormwater Report. A 100% removal rate for both Total Phosphorus and Total Nitrogen was targeted in the design of the infiltration systems on site (refer to Appendix “C” of the revised Stormwater Report). This is in addition to the pavement sweeping, leaf’s removal and cleaning of the catch basins to be performed twice per year. 3. Note the following information on the erosion and sediment control plan: a. For the subsurface infiltration systems, accomplish any required excavation with equipment placed just outside of this area. If the size of the area intended for exfiltration is too large to accommodate this approach, use trucks with low pressure tires to minimize compaction. Keep the area above and immediately surrounding the subsurface structure roped off to all construction vehicles until the final cover is installed (either paving or landscaping). A note to the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan & Drainage Plan has been added as suggested (refer to revised plans). b. Per the Yarmouth Stormwater Regulations, a description of vehicles and equipment fueling procedures, including how fuels and other vehicle maintenance substances will be stored and handled during construction. A fueling detail of construction equipment has been added to the Erosion Control Details and Notes Sheet #2 as suggested (refer to revised plans). 4. Note the following information in the O&M plan. a. The proposed Grading and Drainage Plan does not include Infiltration Ditches. If infiltration ditches are not proposed, the O&M plan should remove this reference in the inspection and maintenance procedures. This has been removed as suggested (refer to revised O&M Plan). b. Restrictions on the application of fertilizers are required per Section 2.05(2)d of the Yarmouth Stormwater Regulations. Notes have been added to the O&M Plan as suggested (refer to revised O&M Plan). We kindly ask that you contact this office if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Choubah Engineering Group, P.C. Halim A. Choubah, P.E. Halim A. Choubah, P.E., President Cc: File, Barbara Hanson, Jay Imad