HomeMy WebLinkAboutFire Alarm Inspection Report 2006@
P.E. CARUSO COMPANY INC.
FOCKLAND, MA O237O
t7e1l a71-0757
FIRE ALARM INSPECTION BEPORT PAGE #1
INSPECTION
F 16403
TO:hrlrtmas T e ho rrq
FREOUENCY annual
LOCATION:
trNo
ENo
ENo!No
ENo
nNo
ENo
!No
ENo!No
261 Whites Path
S- Yarmouthpuat, 0f,f,602575
CUST,
b. Did system trouble signals test satisfactorily?
2. Secondary (stand by) power supply
a. Are batteries in salisfactory condition?
3. Alarm Indicating Appliances
a. Did audible alarms test satistactorily?
b. Did visible alarms test satisfactorily?
4, Automatic fire detectors
a. Did heat detectors test satisfactorily?
b. Did smoke detectors test satisfactorily?
c. Did flame and/or gas detectors test satistactorily?
5. Sprinkler waterflow and supervisory devices
a. Did waterflow switches test satisfactorily?
b. Did pressure switches test satistactorily?
c- Did supervisory switches test satisfactorily?
6, Manual fire boxes and two way telephone
a. Did manual fire boxes test satisfactorily?
b. Did tt/vo way telephones test satistactorily?
7. Emergency Call
a. Did emergency call system test satisfactorily?
8. Miscellaneous
a. Did miscellaneous devices test satisfactorily?
9. Master box or other connection
Sa fet stq
ElYes trNo trN.A.
IIASTERiTRANSMITTER BOX NO # ALARM CIRCUITS- A
lnspector's Section (All responses reference current inspection) N.A. = NOT APPLICABLE
1. Control and Supervisory Panels
a. Did all electrical controls, supervisory panels and annunciator panels test satisfactorily? EI Yes tr No tr N.A.(Yes E No fl N.A
FYes
ffi ves
$Yes
EI Yes
E Yes
E Yes
E Yes
E Yes
E Yes
E Yes
fl N.A.
tr N.A.
tr N.A.-...-..--.
tr N.A.
D(N.A.
E N.A.
tr N.A.
E n.n.
tr N.A.
E N.A.
E Yes ! t'lo F N.A.
E Yes ! No V N.A.
a. Did master box or other connection test satisfactorily? ffi Yes n No n N.A.
10. System left in service pYes ! No
RT. 5A
Ya rmouth ort
Loop Resistance of
Line Type Heat Detection
! N.A,
11. Remarks:
12. Adjustments or Corrections Made
13. Parts Replaced
14. The lnspector suggests the following necessary improvements, repairs, or replacements. These suggestions are not the result
of an Engineering Survey
ow15. lnspector suggested improvement, repairs, replacements were discussed with the
representalive EYes nNo tr N.A.
16. Explanation of "No" Answers
r owne r's
e
l/-/r1t Continued Page tf2 Z Yes E N.A
\
S INSPECTOR
,/:
DATE
SIGNATURE OVYNER ESENTATIVE
t
'-.-<
(PFNTNAME) OAIE