The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutsite plan review comment sheet 2011Formal X lntormal_ BeviewSITE PLAN REVIEIIV COMMENT SHEETDate: Au ust 9 201'l Applicant: Gladstone, LP [/ap: 73 Lot: 9.2.3Location: 31 Aaron's WaV , West Yarmouth Zone: 83 and APD The applicant proposes to move an existing ,tr,ruolffffiril*g to this vacant sire lo be used as awarehouse/wholesale trade building on this lot in the 83 Business Distr]d and tne equiiei eioieciion Dislrict (ApD). Thisproject has been reviewed as a Development o, Regional lmpact by the Cape Cod iommission. As part ol tireir apprwJt,the cape cod commission has directed the applicait to seei the necessary local reliet for a reduction in parking. on amotion by Ms. Greene, seconded by Mr. Murphy, th6 site Plan Review Team votea unanimouiiy to reduc! pa*ing oy sspaces on the plans as presented. quildino: (l)The proposed use is warehouse. ffr" p"*r is based on this use. Changes to such use willchang-e-the parking demand formula. (2)Tho proposed uJe is allowed in the Bg zoning oisrict. ]i1rne site also lies withinthe APD, lhus all .uses will require to be compliant with th6 provisions of zoning uytaw"Seciion +do. 1+1rne proposedstructure is an existing 23'000 Sq. Ft.+t building in the Town of Bamstable. t-tre proposat is to reassembte portions ofthat structure and reduce the square lootage to tz,t so sq. Ft. The reassombleo builiJing is required to meei all applicableprovisions of 78ocMFl, including the 110 MPH loading requirement and construction cdntror.l!1zaoCMR, ChapiJr t,Hazards to Navigation shall be addressed before appl-ying lor lhe buitding permit. (6) prririni 6 me provisions otzoning bylaw Section 301.3.1 the Site Plan Review ieam-voted unanimo-uity ro r"dic" tne firiing by iive spaces to atotal of 18 spaces. Should the use change at any time the appropriate numtier of parking iriices ;n;lr be piovided orreduced as prescribed by the zoning bylaw in effect. *ggg#ePqry!!,_ Ipplicant has met with Design Review committee and has reduced impervious coverage to theenent possrble. Notes from the June 8, 2011 meeting are attached herein. Note that as present6o, tne prolect wiil createapproximately 1 2-1 5 year-round jobs.L$F Persons Present: Bruce Mu Chairman Stuart BornsteinJames Brandolini Dan ORich Anctil Tom Roon IJonathan Sa Karen Greene Kerry lrluldoon n *H!9!;_The-app_licant has ,iled a Nolice o, lntent with the Con Com and has received a Order ot Conditions (Aug.I 'Jju-,.9):l^":!P1t^?-d_t!:-rpptgyed plans with the sile plan review plans and found severat changes inctuding but nor -- llmrted to the reduction of 5 parking spaces, the relocation o, the dumpster and concrete pad outJide the 100 ioot Bullerzone' the addition/relocation of the biorentention area, and the EOP is now t0 feet further iway trom the wefland than onthe approved plan. After reviewing the plan to determina i, the plan variss signilicanfly thus constituting a relilling of a nswNotice of lntent (per condition # 4 of the special condition), I retommend thai the changes as stated above do not reflect asignilicant change to the Wetland Protection Act, therefore the applicant does not hav;to refile with Con com pendingth€y submil two copies ol ths plan with a narrative explaining the differences. Desion Review: Not present. See attached comments from June 9,2011 meeting. Enoineerino: Frcm71612010 - At this time with an informal review, this departmont is working with tho owneds engineer todevelop a site drainage systsm to be reviewed formally at a tuture review. Comm€nts: add proposed drain trenci depth and pipe specifications to the drain she€t (sheet 3), e.g. 12" HDPE (smooth interio0 pertorated/stotted drain pipe; it appears that the proposed elevations of drainage and surface grades may conflict (please review handout given previously); it appears that a portion of the drainage leach trench may be located within the "B" loamy sand layer, over-dig or relocate; revise "Note '10" of the General Notes on Sheet 4 to read "Owner's Engineef in place of "Engineering".; revise the drain grate specilication in the'Flain Garden" sketch on Sheet 4 to agree with the type ancl/or frame and grate reference, e.g. bubble top grate VS the proper manufacturel,s catalog reference number, and; drainage calculations must be submitted prior to final review. From August 9, 201 1 - Submit drainage calculations and corresponding watershed areas for review. f lre O1r 919ery are access, fire hydrants, sprinkler system and a fire alarm system. All ol these concems werered at this site plan reviaw. Same comments for Site plan Review on B/9/1 j .cove ,A*+S: l_11?:ry1._y,l!, APD and will have a nitrogen loading restriction. occupants can nor have hazardous mareriats, ^lY Tl'loI:-ns, no parking trucks inside; no washing ot vehicles on site, Septic ftow must reftecl minimum oflice ftow oiW :-'^'-:I^"_-l:m9-Y Lteren:9 to watsr readings, Septic tank Ts must be undar covers with raisers to grade, middte cover tou graoe ts requtred; no washing or maintaining/repairing ol trucks or cars on site. Plannino: As the proposed structure is above the 1o,ooo SF threshold and review by the Cape Cod Commission as aDevelopment of Regional lmpact is required, unless relief is granted ,rom that l."qri16."nii. granted by the commission.The applicant is presenfly in discussion with the Commissioton that request. Water: l Water Service to be encased in a 3' PVC sleeve where it passes under the paved driveway, and to extend to1 0' beyond pavement. 2. water servrce and electrical equipment to be separated oy a minimum ot 1 0,. 3. water meterand backflow equipment to be assessable at all times. Read & Roceived by Appticant(s) Drp orkr,r t Pe tfu, Revi€rr'v is: D conceptual g Formal o-Binding (404 MotelER.o.A.D. Proi€ct) o Non-binding (A[ other commerciat projects)Review is bv: D ptannino Board el oesion iiviwv Committe; - ' DESIGN REVIEW COMMENT SHEETDala: June 0,2011 Map:73 Lot:9.2.3Applicenl: Gladslone LLc Zone(s):83Location: 31 Aarons Way. West Yarmou rh Oick Martln Persons Present: Sara Jano rter Tom OiPersio Karen Greene ll this is a @ncaludl review, a lormal review wilt b6 belorc Site Plan Review Androe Adams Stu Bo Dan O I Applicanr proposes to ,or" 1.]^11-10-11"r" toor urtHffifrffis ro 31 Aaron! wey. Buitdins wifl be usd a3 ewarehous€ and is being revi*€d as such. Proied is con-siaireo i.m"noatorv oeveropme?rr o-t negionat lmpad and iscurrently under review as such. Appllcant has ipplieo to Cape cod commtssion tor a-iam*iip exempdon. ln meegn,with Ya.mouth ptannins Bosrd and Community ino econom[" oer";p;;;*i;;'i,r:l,li'r'ili,.r, a'reed ro undemooesign Revi* process. Proposed building wiil ue sirnaiini"caao design ro rhe nearry simoiGir-ipii6,iri"'JlJl1i,r ,"describ€d in appllcs on naaralive. Applicant raised possibility of adding a tumamund thal ryould eliminate some parting speces h.rt that tvouH result inadditional, and possibly mor8, impervious coverage. Trellises proposed every 25' on norlhem side; additional doors and windows on southem side; cedar shingles with whitelrBllls; vertical sidng is be(Ie. Applicar has developed plans targeted for a single tenanl, but does not rulo orit th€ possibility ot mor6 than on€ tenanl. Site is not viside from puulc way, is very accessible from Exit 7. Applicant encouraged lo retain as much eisling v€ge(ation as is possible. Rayicw Comm.nt! ln Relaflon To Thr Dllion Standardt SITING STRATEGIES Sect. 1. Streetscap€ O Meets Standard3, or0 Oiscrepanci6: l.lA Seci. 2. Tenanl Soaces O Mo6ts Standard3, orE Discrepancies: NA Sect. 3. Oefino Street Edoo 0 M€€G Slandard3, o, O Oiscrepancid: NA Soct. 4. Shield Lamo Buildinos E Meclt Standa.d3, or O Oiscr4lancie3: Sed- 5. Desion a 2d Storv O Me€t3 Standard!, or0 Oilcrepanci€.: M :ecl A tJse r')oo to screen New oeverooment 1.r l,leets Jran.rards, or rl Drscrepancies ,A secl' 7' Landscaoe Buffergscreenino a ire3ts standards, or E oiscrepanci6: Required bufters are proydod Sect. 8. Parftino Lot Visibilitv El Me€ts Standards, or O Oiscrepanci$: sect' 9' Break uo Lamg Partino.Lots o Me€t3 stsndord3, or Q oiscrepanciB: commlueo sncourag€d applicant to rEduccparking lc( siz€ and to pro/ido additionaagreen-space bufler to tn"l,u. oC6-r*or,,,-'ij;'t#j[;;ii'"Yt" ,orgtt to "ro'' r"",pa'king lhan requirsd zoning, particularlyin light bt Aquite. prcr;;-6i*ria -o lla*"ii.,t"gii".ic ii* oacr,ntnaion ot.N. Take. has alr€ady been made) mapping as well as th€ likelihood that tho zoning bylaw roquir€s mors,.parking thal will be. practically n".JJ- n""o6i1enOaion is ltrat iiruti side parking be moved clos6r to building, a'turning T' be utilized, and additional buffer bs provided, and reducing tho amount o, open spaca disturbancs. S€cl. 10. Locat€ Lnilitles Underoround o l\,leets standards, or E Discrepancias: NA Sect. 1 1. Shield Loadino Areas EIMe€ts Standards, or o DiscrePancias: BUILDING STRATEGIEE Sec{. 1 . Break Oown Buildino Mass - Multiole Bldos. tr Meets Standards, or E Discrepancios: NA S€ct. 2. Break Oown Buildino Mass - Sub-Masses tr Maets Slandar&, or E Oiscrepancio3: - Request that siding be continuad hesouthandwestemsides.ReqU€stadditionalwindolssoUthandwest. Trsllis63 to bo addod to north sid.. Seci. 3. Varv Faoado Lines D Meets Standards, or O Oiscr6panci6:NA - trellis and windows will help to vary tho facades Seci. ,1. Varv Wall Heiohls O MosE StandarG, or o oiscrePanci6: NA Sect. 5. VaN Roof Lines o Meots Standards, or E Oiscropancies: NA Soct. O. Brlno Down Buildlno Edoes tr Me€ts Standards, or El DlscrsPanciss: NA S€cl. 7. VarY Buildino Mst'ls For DeDth E Meets Standards, or tr oiscropancies: NA Seci. 8. Uss Traditional & Natl. Buildlno Mal'ls EM€€ts Standards, or D DiscrePancie3: Sect. 9. lncorDorato Pedeslrian-scaled Features E Meets Standar&, orE Oiscrepanci6: NA Seci. I O. lncomorate Enemy-efllder Desion Et Mocts Standards, or 0 Olsqspancies: R6uso/recyding of existing building; energy eff'lciency being roriewed by caP. Cod commbsion. Next step for epplicant: D Go lo site Plan Review o Retum to Design Reviev, for Formal Review Reed t Receaved by Applicant(s)