HomeMy WebLinkAboutDMF Comment 11.5.2025The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Division of Marine Fisheries
(617) 626-1520 | www.mass.gov/marinefisheries
MAURA T. HEALEY KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL REBECCA L. TEPPER THOMAS K. O’SHEA DANIEL J. MCKIERNAN
Governor Lt. Governor Secretary Commissioner Director
SOUTH COAST FIELD STATION CAT COVE MARINE LABORATORY NORTH SHORE FIELD STATION
836 S. Rodney French Blvd 92 Fort Avenue 30 Emerson Avenue
New Bedford, MA 02744 Salem, MA 01970 Gloucester, MA 01930
November 5, 2025
Yarmouth Conservation Commission
1146 Route 28
South Yarmouth, MA 02664
Dear Commissioners:
The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MA DMF) has reviewed the Notice of Intent
(NOI) by John Serijan to license an existing pier, gangway, and floats, within Follins Pond at 53
Aunt Dorahs Lane in the Town of Yarmouth. The applicant is also proposing to alter the existing
decking over salt marsh to create 1” deck spacing and a 4’ decking width. The project was
reviewed with respect to potential impacts to marine fisheries resources and habitat.
The project site includes salt marsh vegetation. Salt marsh provides a variety of ecosystem
services, including habitat and energy sources for many fish and invertebrate species [1-2]
The project site lies within mapped shellfish habitat for northern quahog (Mercenaria
mercenaria) and softshell clam (Mya arenaria). Waters within the project site have habitat
characteristics suitable for these species. Quahog were found within the project site during a
shellfish survey conducted by BSC Group on April 28, 2025. Land containing shellfish is
deemed significant to the interest of the Wetlands Protection Act (310 CMR 10.34) and the
protection of marine fisheries.
Follins Pond has been identified by MA DMF as diadromous fish passage, migration, and/or
spawning habitat for alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus), white perch (Morone americana), and
American eel (Anguilla rostrata) [3].
Follins Pond acts as winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) spawning habitat. Winter
flounder enter the area and spawn from January through May; demersal eggs hatch
approximately 15 to 20 days later. The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission has
designated winter flounder spawning habitat as a “Habitat Area of Particular Concern” (HAPC).
In the previous stock assessment, the winter flounder stock was classified as overfished, with
spawning stock biomass in 2019 estimated to be only 32% of the biomass target [4]. Spawning
stock biomass in 2021 was estimated to be 101% of the biomass target based on a new
recruitment stanza focusing only on the past twenty years [5]. Given the new status of the winter
flounder stock, every effort should be made to protect the species and its spawning habitat.
MA DMF offers the following comments for your consideration:
2
• MA DMF conducted two field studies to assess the relationship between shading, marsh
growth, and dock design; these studies collectively indicated that a height-to-width
(H:W) ratio of 1.5:1 between the base of horizontal stringers and salt marsh reduced
shading and marsh loss relative to the typically required 1:1 H:W ratio [6-8]. Current
plans show a proposed pier width of 4 feet and less than 3 feet of clearance between the
lowest stringer and salt marsh. Current plans do not meet the 1.5:1 H:W ratio
recommendation. MA DMF recommends establishing a minimum 1.5:1 H:W ratio for
pier decking across the full extent that overlies the marsh by either raising the elevation
of the decking height or reducing the decking width.
• Grounded floats can disturb bottom sediments, resulting in turbidity and direct impacts to
benthic habitat. To minimize impacts, MA DMF recommends that the bottom of a
proposed float be at least 2.5 feet (30 inches) above the substrate over mapped shellfish
habitat, at MLW [6]. The floats, as proposed, do not maintain this minimum clearance at
MLW. MA DMF recommends installing pile-supported float stops to maintain a 2.5-foot
clearance above the substrate at MLW.
• Any activities requiring a barge should be restricted to 2 hours before and after high tide
to prevent barge grounding in mapped shellfish habitat.
• Fuel spills from refueling of construction equipment will adversely impact sensitive
resource areas. Impacts to resource areas can be avoided by prohibiting all land-based
equipment from being refueled on-site. If equipment is refueled on-site, adequate
containment and clean-up material should be required to minimize impacts.
Questions regarding this review may be directed to Amanda Davis at amanda.davis@mass.gov.
Sincerely,
Amanda Davis
Environmental Analyst
MA Division of Marine Fisheries
cc:
Daniel A. Ojala, Down Cape Engineering, Inc.
John Logan, Kara Falvey, Holly Williams, MA DMF
Casaundra Healy, Yarmouth Shellfish Constable
Patrice Bordonaro, CZM
AD/kf
References:
1. Deegan, L.A. and R.H. Garritt. 1997. “Evidence for spatial variability in estuarine food
webs.” Marine Ecology Progress Series 147:31-47.
https://doi.org/10.3354/MEPS147031.
2. Boesch, D.F. and R.E. Turner. 1984. “Dependence of Fishery Species on Salt Marshes:
3
The Role of Food and Refuge.” Estuaries 7(4):460-468. https://doi.org/10.2307/1351627.
3. MA DMF. MassGIS Data: Diadromous Fish. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/massgis-
data-diadromous-fish. Accessed February 8, 2023. 2023.
4. ASMFC. 2020. Southern New England Mid-Atlantic Winter Flounder 2020 Assessment
Update Report. http://www.asmfc.org/uploads/file/6008bd822020_SNE-
MA_WinterFlounderAssessmentUpdate.pdf
5. ASMFC. 2022. Southern New England Mid-Atlantic winter flounder 2022 Management
Track Assessment Report. Compiled June 2022. https://apps-
nefsc.fisheries.noaa.gov/saw/sasi.php
6. Logan, J.M., A. Boeri, J. Carr, T. Evans, E.M. Feeney, K. Frew, F. Schenck, and K.H.
Ford. 2022. A review of habitat impacts from residential docks and recommended Best
Management Practices with an emphasis on the northeastern United States. Estuaries
Coasts 45: 1189–1216. https://www.mass.gov/doc/dock-bmp-
recommendations/download
7. Logan, J.M., A. Davis, C. Markos, K.H. Ford. 2018. “Effects of docks on salt marsh
vegetation: An evaluation of ecological impacts and the efficacy of current design
standards.” Estuaries and Coasts 41:661–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0323-1
8. Logan, J.M., S. Voss, A. Davis, K.H. Ford. 2018. “An experimental evaluation of dock
shading impacts on salt marsh vegetation in a New England estuary.” Estuaries and
Coasts 41:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0268-4