HomeMy WebLinkAboutsite plan review 2004Formal_ lnformaLx_Review
SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
ate: october 5, 20(N
nt: Hen L. Mu
Location: 2 Apache Drive, Yamouth Port
New 143 New Lot:112
Old Map:Old Lot:
Per3ons Present:
La Mu
Dan O ala
Peter Raiskio
Karen Gregne
This is an infomal site plan r€view. A formal site dan review is required before epplication to the Board of Appeals.
Proiect Summerv
The applicant proposes to conslrud a 6,E00 square foot new ofnce building at this site, which is located in yarmouth port,
partly in the Bl Business Zone and partly within the R40 Resuer ial Zone. The locetion is elso within the Aquifer
Protection Dstrict (APD) and within the old Kirq's Highway Regional His oric Distrid. See Site plan Reviewcomments
of November 4, 1994, atlached, which reMeu,ed a very similar plan.
Building: Not Pr€sent comments
$b-cor.,rnitv D.veloprner : will rcquire old Kings Highway reviery. Please see ettacfied site plen commerns frorn1994
Goniervataon: NotPresent
D,e3ign Reviewr Not Prrsent
neering : Details will be ne€ded including drainage, dimensions of p€rking spaces, buffers, buffer trees and travel
Drain cslculations, tesl dts, drain 8nd paving details will need to be rcvieu,ed. contouG suggest that runoff isleaving the property. Some drain basins are shown in the buffers trces. Describe the dense evergrBen hedge to makesure it meets the dimensional rsquiremonts. Review all th6 provisions of Seotion gol in th€zoning bylaws. Several drives
appear lo be within 250 feet ofthis p{ojed entrance.
4/.water: lf sprinkle or basement must come in off RT 6A for water line. This should be identified on a more formal planRead & Receivad by Applicanqsl
ffiFirc: lf sq footage is 7500 sq st or over than sprinkler system is required. This indudes sg footege of 1d, 2M, basement,F and attic storage areas. Access is adequate from Rt 6A. Recommend fire alarm syslem. Musl meet all requirements
under 780 CMR and 527 CMR. Recornmend lock box.
Health: Deep soil te$s needod, possible past stumps on property. No doctors pmposed which would effeci septicdesign. Septic must be located outside Zone ll as shown.
Planning: Not present, bul have offered the following comments: Th6 applicant proposes general oflice use forlhis newstructure, which is broadly outlined in the zoning Bylaw Section 202.5 Use Code ss Category O. of6ce us€s aregenerally allowed in the Bl aM APD, but some specmc uses may require Board of Appeils relief. For lhose oftice usesth-at only require rBlief in theAPD, the epplicant may file for a Determination of Apdbability, under Bylaw section406.5.1.1' with the Building commi&sioner. office uses are not allofled in the Rid Residential zone. However. the sitedan sho\Ns thet the building is locsted entirely out of lhe residentialzone. Since the prcject is arso tocateo w trir in" oxx Pdis1ricl,revie{,vandepprov8lfiomthediStrictcommineewil|berequiredforthebuildi;gdnosignage.Perkinglot<
screening' per 301.4.5, is required on the projed parkirE lot! southem and south rveiem edges lwnerever ine parkirp ,,lot facss residerflial uses/di$rict; show these screens on the plan. Also labol typical parking +ace sizes on the blan, a-su,ell as the tyFical spacing ber\,Yeen buffer trees and the entrancelexit oriveway 'radii. 'e ,"i pr*ing calculations for th" 9.slruclure show 34 spaces are required; 34 spaces are shown on the plan. ,
Rich An(cil
Vem Santos
Bruce Murphy
a
9
t
(
CE
Gr'Icifol
?
1
JANT: SIJNFLOWER MARXET PI,ACE
,IION OF PROPERTY:
-'E: NOV. 8, 1994
96 nomr 6a YARPORT bAlVG l2g , ..,_ QI_!vl _
Yes _ g6
IRSONS PRESENT:
6 or 7 Plans Subnitted?
Teee Y SY-vn
IZ,N -L -;ot
\Y 6L 8n,sL,oE".no,O/z.trzu
COMMENTS:
o
3
10/.4,
i;*- 1 mt..rv/g
ft- urT ni<l^+a L-I
J Or f;srtbs
k.e Nsas sh(i"
3 /r.-lc
6.Z,'tl
/2
L
t
SIGNED BY:
Building Dept._
Board of Health
Fire Dept.
Cons ervation
READ &BY AD
PLanning Dept.
Water Dept.
These conmenEs are based on the info. & plan provided at the time of review.
Aar o
-
Engineerjng Dept.