HomeMy WebLinkAbout5205 Kings Way Decision Certified 12.22.25RRMOLIYH TOWN CLERK RE
DEC 22'25 H2:51
_.c YA�
FILED WITH TOWN CLERK:
PETITION NO:
HEARING DATE:
TOWN OF YARMOUTH
BOARD OF APPEALS
DECISION
December 22, 2025
5205
December 11, 2025
PETITIONERS: George Delaney, Sandy Ulrich, Steven Day, Thomas
Holland, Marie Pereto-Hedin, Bruce Turner, Peter
Hutton, Lee Rowley and Peter Marinelli, Trustees of the
Kings Way Condominium Trust, u/d/t dated May 12,
1987, filed with the Registry District as Document No.
433670, as affected by Amendment No. 2, dated
September 25, 2001, filed with said Registry District as
Document No. 847992, as further affected by
Amendment No. 3, dated November 25, 2008, filed with
said Registry District as Document No. 1105817, as
further affected by Amendment, dated May 18, 2023,
filed with said Registry District as Document No.
1481780, as amended, by virtue of a deed from Anthony
D. Green, Joseph R. Valle and Donald K. Kurson, as
Trustees of the Kings Way Condominium Trust, dated
March 18, 1988, filed with said Registry District as
Document No. 454932, creating Certificate of Title No.
136382
PROPERTY OWNER: Same as Petitioners
PROPERTY: Property located off of Nottingham Drive in Yarmouth,
MA, shown as a portion of Lot 55 on Land Court Plan
34279-H, containing 3.14 acres, more or less, and shown
on a Plan of Land entitled "Boundary Plan, Off
Nottingham Drive," dated October 29, 2025, prepared
by Merrill Engineers and Land Surveyors
Map 142, Parcel 17
Zoning District: R-40
MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING: Chairman Sean Igoe, Dick Martin, John Mantoni,
Richard Neitz, and Anthony Panebianco
q E COP i?EST
c +MO i'PAN/ 1r2026 K
Notice of the hearing has been given by sending notice thereof to the Petitioners and all those
owners of property as required by law, and to the public by posting notice of the hearing and
publishing in The Cape Cod Times, the hearing opened and held on the date stated above.
The subject lot is located off of Nottingham Drive in Yarmouth, MA, shown as a portion of Lot
55 on Land Court Plan 34279-H and also shown on a Plan of Land entitled "Boundary Plan, Off
Nottingham Drive," dated October 29, 2025 and prepared by Merrill Engineers and Land
Surveyors, submitted with the Petition (hereinafter the "Lot"). The Lot consists of 3.14 acres, more
or less, and is part of Parcel 17 on the Town of Yarmouth Assessor's Map 142. The Lot is located
in the R-40 Zoning District and is part of a larger 194-acre property that has been developed in
accordance with a Special Permit and certain Variances issued in 1975, as explained below (the
"Property").
The Property is owned by George Delaney, Sandy Ulrich, Steven Day, Thomas Holland, Marie
Pereto-Hedin, Bruce Turner, Peter Hutton, Lee Rowley and Peter Marinelli, Trustees of the Kings
Way Condominium Trust, u/d/t dated May 12, 1987, filed with the Registry District as Document
No. 433670, as affected by Amendment No. 2, dated September 25, 2001, filed with said Registry
District as Document No. 847992, as further affected by Amendment No. 3, dated November 25,
2008, filed with said Registry District as Document No. 1105817, as further affected by
Amendment, dated May 18, 2023, filed with said Registry District as Document No. 1481780, as
amended, by virtue of a deed from Anthony D. Green, Joseph R. Valle and Donald K. Kurson, as
Trustees of the Kings Way Condominium Trust, dated March 18, 1988, filed with said Registry
District as Document No. 454932, creating Certificate of Title No. 136382.
The Petitioners seek the following relief -
Modification of the Board's October 16, 1975 Decision, identified as "Decision 1321," and to
provide relief from, and removal of, any open space restriction placed on the area comprising the
Lot.
Decision 1321, issued in response to a petition submitted by Oak Harbor Associates ("OHA") in
April 1975 and described in further detail below, allowed the development of 194 acres of vacant
land to the north of Route 6A in Yarmouth and situated between Route 6A and Bray Farm Road,
owned at the time by Yarmouth Properties, Inc., Yarmouth, Mass. and Aaron G. Weintraub,
Trustee of the MVI Nominee Realty Trust.
The Petitioners, through their representatives, presented evidence demonstrating that the requested
modification and relief is permitted by, and consistent with, the Town's By-laws:
Specifically, the Petitioners established that the Town amended its Zoning By-laws during its 1973
Annual Town Meeting by adopting a new section allowing for Open Space Village Development,
which was amended a year later during its 1974 Special Town Meeting.
OHA applied for, and on or about October 16, 1975 received, a Special Permit, pursuant to the
Open Space Village Development By-law, as well as fourteen related requests for Variances,
authorizing the development of the Property. In particular, OHA requested, and received, a Special
A TRUE COPY ATTEST.
CMMU { CMC / TOWN CLERK
JAN 12 2026
Permit under Section 18:07 of the By-law, as well as Variances that provided for, among other
things: (1) access to the residences sought to be constructed; (2) access to structures and features
appurtenant to the project; (3) non-residential uses; and (4) construction and development of other
structures and facilities that may or may not have been compliant with the By-law. The approved
Special Permit and Variances, together, allowed for the development of separate residential
buildings, each containing no more than 24 units, for a total of 750 dwelling units, as well as a
community center complex, gatehouse, garden club building, sewage treatment plant, maintenance
facilities and related accessory structures.
The Special Permit included a number of conditions, including one that required that the
undeveloped portions of the Property be designated, and maintained as, "open space" as required
by Section 18:07(4)(F), which provided:
"All land not designated for roads, dwellings or other development within the Open
Space Village Development shall be held for common use of the residents of the
Development. Common open space shall be preserved for recreation or
conservation; and shall comprise not less than 30 percent of the `Applicable Land
Area' within the Development Plan. Ownership of common open space areas shall
be arranged and maintenance permanently assured through an incorporated
homeowner's association, condominium deeds, or other recorded land agreement
through which I` owner in the development is automatically a member and each
lot is subject to a charge for a share of the maintenance expenses, or through
comparable arrangement satisfactory to the Board of Appeals. Preservation shall be
guaranteed through dedication, by covenant or comparable legal instrument, to the
community use and enjoyment of residents of the development tract, for
recreational purposes serving those residents and their non-paying guests only, or
for conservation. In addition, the town shall be granted an easement over such land
sufficient to ensure its perpetual maintenance as conservation or recreation land.
Building coverage shall not exceed 5 percent in such conservation or recreation
areas."
Since the By-law provided that land not designated for roads, dwellings or other development
within the Open Space Village Development shall be held for the common use of the residents of
the development, and that such common open space be preserved for recreation and conservation,
the area of land comprising the Lot was considered as open space for purposes of compliance with
the minimum open space requirement outlined in the By-law. However, the Board acknowledged
in Decision 1321 that the developed area of the 194-acre Property comprises significantly less than
70 percent of its total area. Page 9 of Decision 1321 states:
"The main requirement is contained in the second sentence of the By-law, wherein
it is stated that common open space shall comprise not less than thirty (30%)
percent of the applicable land area shown on the development plan. We have added
up the land area represented by the lots on which the Petitioner indicates that
dwellings or other structures may be placed; we find that the total is less than
seventy (70%) percent of the applicable land area as set forth in the land surveyor's
report. We are satisfied that the remaining lots (some of which are shown as open
ATRUE COPY ATTEST:
c:MMa JAM
1 2 202CLERK
lands on the overall development plan) are capable of meeting this thirty (30%)
percent test.
We make no findings or decision as to the particular lots or the order in which
particular lots may be selected and dedicated by the Petitioner [itself) as the
required open space under paragraph 4-F of the By-law. The paragraph clearly
limits the lots which may be used for this purpose to those on which (essentially)
no construction is to take place. This requirement is one of the many on -going
provisions that will be applicable to the project as it progresses and with which the
developer will have to comply, except as we may grant exception thereto by
variance. Section 18:07 calls for no specific findings or determinations by us on
this matter and in our judgment none should be entered."
The land comprising the Lot, as well as other lots left undeveloped, were conveyed and dedicated
as open space in 1988:
On March 18, 1988, Anthony D. Green, Joseph R. Valle and Donald K. Kurson,
Trustees of Kings Way Condominium Trust u/d/t dated July 31, 1987, registered
with the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds as Document No. 441933, amended
by Document No. 441936 "Grantors"), deeded to Anthony D. Green, Joseph R.
Valle, Donald K. Kurson and Peter Strand, as Trustees of the Kings Way Trust,
u/d/t dated May 12, 1987, registered with the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds
as Document 433670 ("Grantees"), the lands identified as Lots 44, 49 and 52 on
Land Court Plan No. 34279G and Lots 55 (including land comprising the Proposed
Lot), 57, 58, 59, 61 and 62 on Land Court Plan No. 34279H, as "common areas and
facilities of Kings Way," a condominium established by Master Deed dated July
31, 1987, registered with Barnstable County Registry of Deeds as Document No.
441932, amended by Document No. 441935, registered under Master
Condominium Certificate of Title No. C-240.
The deed specified that the aforementioned lots, combined with Lot 10 shown on Land Court Plan
No. 34279C, Lot 14 on Land Court Plan No. 34279G, already owned by the grantees under
Certificate of Title No. 92243 and 112651, "contain over 99 acres in the aggregate and constitute
all of the Open Space lots in Kings Way, which the Grantors, and the Grantees by acceptance
thereof, dedicate as such and restrict to open space purposes as provided in applicable documents
of record."
The dedication of the 99.1 acres (approximately 51 percent) of the 194-acre Property as open space
more than met the By-law's 30 percent threshold, and the removal of the 3.14-acre Lot, as
requested, does not materially affect that ratio. Indeed, as Dean Boumitri, P.L.S, of Merrill
Engineers and Land Surveyors, writes in her October 29, 2025 letter, submitted with the Petition,
the removal of the restriction on the Lot would leave 96.01 acres of dedicated open space
remaining, which is 49.5 percent of the Property.
A TRUE COPY ATTEST
&W-d. TwielvJ4
CmMO / CMC 1 TOWN CLERK
JAN 12 2026
Allowance of this Petition and change in use of the Lot, therefore, is permitted by the By-law, as
it would not bring the amount of open space under the 30 percent threshold. Furthermore, the
change in use, to open space, is a permitted use of the Lot. See Zoning By-law, Article II, §202.5.
At the hearing, the Board received a copy of Special Town Meeting Article No. 11, passed by the
voters on November 17, 2025 and certified by the Yarmouth Town Clerk on November 26, 2025.
Article No. 11 included the following about the proposed Open Space Acquisition:
"...that said land to be conveyed and managed by the Yarmouth Conservation Commission and
used exclusively for open space, passive recreation, and land conservation purposes... and further
to authorize the Select Board and the Conservation Commission to grant or accept perpetual
conservation restriction in limiting the use of the property as aforesaid. Said conservation
restriction may be granted to the Yarmouth Conservation Trust or any other organization qualified
and willing to hold such a restriction. "
Chairman Sean Igoe proposed that a Motion be made regarding the requested modification of
Decision 1321 and to remove any Open Space restriction on the area comprising the Lot, as
described above. A Motion was then made by Mr. Mantoni and seconded by Mr. Panebianco to
approve the Petition as requested. A roll call vote was taken on this Motion with the following
results: Mr. Martin: AYE; Mr. Neitz: NAY; Mr. Mantoni: AYE; Mr. Panebianco: AYE; Chairman
Igoe: AYE.
Accordingly, the Petition seeking to modify Decision 1321, dated October 16, 1975, to remove the
Open Space restriction placed on the proposed Lot, was approved on a 4-1 vote in favor. Therefore,
the modification to Decision 1321, as requested, was granted.
No permit shall issue until 20 days from the filing of this decision with the Town Clerk. Appeals
from this decision shall be made pursuant to MGL c40A section 17 and must be filed within 20
days after filing of this notice.`decision with the Town Clerk. Unless otherwise provided herein,
the Special Permit shall lapse if a substantial use thereof has not begun within 24 months. (See By-
law §103.2.5, M.G.L. c. 40A, §9)
c
Sean Igoe, Chairman
A TRUE COPY ATTEST.
L'M A s I CMC I TOWN CLERK
JAN 12 2026
CERTIFICATION OF TOWN CLERK
1, Mary A. Maslowski, Town Clerk, Town of Yarmouth, do hereby certify that 20 days have
elapsed since the filing with me of the above Board of Appeals Decision #5205 that no notice of
appeal of said decision has been filed with me, or, if such appeal has been filed it has been
dismissed or denied. All avenues of appeal have expired or been exhausted.
Y�A-e- WW&xtj4
Mary A. Maslowski, MMC, CMMC
JAN 12 2026
A TRUE COPY ATTEST
i&��a &Wtv i
`C:1 NIO CMC / TOWN CLERK
JAN 12 2026
N
K COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
TOWN OF YARMOUTH
i.,it06
BOARD OF APPEALS
��RPORASE��
Petition #: 5205 Date: January 12, 2026
Certificate of Granting of a Special Permit
(General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11)
The Board of Appeals of the Town of Yarmouth Massachusetts hereby certifies that a Special Permit has been
granted to:
PETITIONERS: George Delaney, Sandy Ulrich, Steven Day, Thomas Holland, Marie Pereto-Hedin,
Bruce Turner, Peter Hutton, Lee Rowley and Peter Marinelli, Trustees of the Kings Way Condominium
Trust, u/d/t dated May 12, 1987, filed with the Registry District as Document No. 433670, as affected by
Amendment No. 2, dated September 25, 2001, filed with said Registry District as Document No. 847992,
as further affected by Amendment No. 3, dated November 25, 2008, filed with said Registry District as
Document No. 1105817, as further affected by Amendment, dated May 18, 2023, filed with said Registry
District as Document No. 1481780, as amended, by virtue of a deed from Anthony D. Green, Joseph R.
Valle and Donald K. Kurson, as Trustees of the Kings Way Condominium Trust, dated March 18, 1988,
filed with said Registry District as Document No. 454932, creating Certificate of Title No. 136382
PROPERTY OWNER: Same as Petitioners
Affecting the rights of the owner with respect to land or buildings at: Property located off of Nottingham
Drive in Yarmouth, MA, shown as a portion of Lot 55 on Land Court Plan 34279-H, containing 3.14
acres, more or less, and shown on a Plan of Land entitled "Boundary Plan, Off Nottingham Drive," dated
October 29, 2025, prepared by Merrill Engineers and Land Surveyors; Map 142, Parcel 17; Zoning
District: R-40 and the said Board of Appeals further certifies that the decision attached hereto is a true and
correct copy of its decision granting said Special Permit, and copies of said decision, and of all plans referred to
in the decision, have been filed.
The Board of Appeals also calls to the attention of the owner or applicant that General Laws, Chapter 40A,
Section 11 (last paragraph) and Section 13, provides that no Special Permit, or any extension, modification or
renewal thereof, shall take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the Town Clerk that
twenty (20) days have elapsed after the decision has been filed in the office of the Town Clerk and no appeal
has been filed or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the
Registry of Deeds for the county and district in which the land is located and indexed in the grantor index under
the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's certificate of title. The fee for such
recording or registering shall be paid by the owner or applicant.
Sean Igoe, Chairman
A TRUE COPY ATTEST
CMMO MC I TQWN CLEF�K
JAN 12 2026