HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Lancet NFG Policy for Public Health_2026Nicotine-free generations: a bold policy for public health @ @
Nicotine use remains the leading preventable cau5e of
death and disability worldwide. While the popularity of
non-combustible nicotine produds such as e-cigarettes
and pouches has surged in re(ent years. growing
evidence highlights their detrimental effects. Although
non-combustible products su(h as electronic (igarettes
might aid adults who smoke, their overall benefits and
harms remain uncertain, and they do not address the (ore
issue: nicotine use disorder. Across the USA and around
the globe, a growing proportion of younger generations
acquire a nicotine addi(tion by vaping, and many of them
are unaware ofthe long-term associated .isks.
By alterinq neural circuit development of the brain,
nicotine can cause long-term cognative and behavioural
impairments leading to de6(its in learning, working
memory, and attention control. Nicotine disrupts
reward system pathways, promoting addiction and
mood disorders. Of further concern, non-combustible
nicotine products commonly (ontain unregulated and
understudied additives that have toxic effe(ts on the
body. Despite recent legislative efforts to limit youth
ac(ess to nicotine products, includinq Tobacco 21 laws
that raised the leqal purchase age and restrictions on the
sale of flavoured ni(otine products, nicotine addiction
among youth remains a severe and insuf6(iently
addressed public health challenge.
Nicotine-free generation legislation offers a unique
and transformative solution. tlnlike current age-based
laws that raise the legal age of purchase, ni(otine-free
generation policies implement a birth date restriction:
those born after a speci6( date will never be legally sold
nicotine products.
This policy deserves serious consideration. First, because
nicotine-free generation laws are based on date of birth,
they allow anyone who currently has legal acces5 to
nicotine products to retain that a(cess for life. Without an
abrupt ban, the policy creates a slowly shifting landscape
that tilts future generations away front harm, ensuring
that retailers and adult consumers can adjust over time.
Second, enforcement is solely targeted at commer(ial
retail sales. lndividuals, especially young people, are not
criminalised for possessing or using ni(otine. By avoiding
criminali5ation of the consumer or possessor of niaotine
produ(ts, this helps prevent racial and socioe(onomic
disparitie5 in policing and punishment that have historically
harmed drug enforcement policjes. ln other word5, under
nicotine-free generation policies, no individual, of any age,
will be charged for either the possession or use of nicotine
products. Nicotine-free generation is a public health
strategy, not a punitive one. lt does not burden individuals
but rather holds the tobac.o industry ac(ountable. Third,
nicotine-free generation targets the heart of nirotine
use disorder: adolescence. Nicotine use disorder is
overwhelmingly a paediatri(-onset condition. N€arly 90%
of adult smokers started smoking before age 18 years,
and 98% before age 26 years. Thus, preventing adolescent
expo5ure to ni(otine products is a highly effective
prevention strategy. Critics of ni(otine-free generation
might raise concerns about autonom, arguing that adults
should have the right to make their own choices, even
harmful ones. But similar de(i5ions have been made in the
public interest before. We have removed lead from gasoline,
asbestos from construction, andtrans fat5 from food.These
changes were not made because individuals were incapable
of choosing differentl, but becau5e the (ost to public
health was too high to justify ongoing exposure.
The same should apply to nicotine. Every day in clinical
practice, we hear patients say, "l wish I had never started
smoking." We have never heard any patient say "l am sorry
I was never given the opportunity to become addicted to
nicotine." Patient5 talk about the money lost, the stigma
endured, the years of life lost, and the inability to quit
despite a deep desire to be free of addiction. Their regret
is not about lost autonom, but about being failed by
a public health system.
52213-2500(25)00400-X
Ihironlin. publi..rion h..
b..n @rE<t.d lhe<orE<t.d
v.6ion fi6t .pp....d .t
th.l..@t..om/r.spinto.yon
F.' nor.oh ni.6ti..u!. i*
396i 1223 49
For nor on t hc .ff.dr o,
na.oli..onth. brainee
19o: 106716.nd1 Phrnol 2015,
593 (Pt 15):3197 412
For rcrc on the ton( .Ilat3 o,
ni(otim on th. body ,e
htlPt://M !n9 oq/blog/
d..q.roui-vape-liqred'.nts
For mo,con youth tob.<o ut.
* htrps://prog@sepon
(.n<s gov/prcvention/lobz..o/
13
!
!
wtwthelan(et..om/.erpi.arory Vot 14 jrnu.ry2025
15
Spotlight
SpotlightI
For more on (@ntri.t
conside ngni.otine.f@
gln.Btion m..iur6 @
H ehh P ali.y 2o2 4 ; 7 47 | 7o5r2 3,
5.ie"(20241 184: 829,and
https //M.toba(cotadics or9/
an(le/roba(co-indunry-
inlcderen(e-with-endgame-
poli.iet
For moe on Maldivermoting
b.. for y@.g.r g.nentiont
qe httpr://M bb..co.uk/
ewrdi(l.Y(Ex3154l8jo
For more on ni<otaFfrc
generation m€-uret inth.
USA*ehnps://
(ommonkalthb€eon o.9/
gow.n6enVnateqovehm€nV
masrawmake6-we 9h-a-
rtatewide-age.b.red-ni<orine-
ban/
For morc on lh€ opp6ition ol
th. tobacco industry o n
tob.c.6 @ntrol poli(i6 R
Iob Prd C6at 2021: 9: 39
En(ouragingly, nicotine-free generation policies are
already gaining traction across the world. Countries such
as New Zealand, Malaysia, and the UK, have considered
ni(otine-free generation style measures. While efforts from
the tobacco industry have stymied these policies before
they could take effect, as of December 2025, The Maldives
became the 6rst (ountry to implement a countrywide
nicotine-free generation policy. Additionally, around
20 municipalities (all in Massachusetts, US) have already
implemented nicotine-free generation law5 and multiple
US states are now considering statewide legislation.
These efforts face 6erce opposition from the tobacco
and vaping industrier. These (orporations are highly
skilled at undermining public health legislation through
lobbying, litigation, and misinformation. Some nicotine-
free generation efforts have been rolled back due to
such pressure, but the core idea remains popular among
the public and is increasingly embraced by health
professionals.
The challenge now is to build on thi5 momentum and
push forward with smart, ju5t, and evidence-based policies
that prioritise the health of future generations. This is not
about stigmatising people who use nicotine or punishinq
addiction. lt is simply an effort to ensu.e that today's youth
do not become tomorrow's regretful smokers. Nicotine-
free generation laws do not penalise those who are already
addicted. They do not judge. They do not criminalise.
lnstead, they offer the next generation something pre(iou5:
the opportunity to grow up free from the peNasive
influence of nicotine addidion, rather than experience the
travesty of preventable morbidity and mortality endured
by past generations from nicotine addiction. Although
legitimate (oncerns exist, su(h as the potential emergence
of black markets, 6nancial effects on retailers, and effects
on <eremonial tobacco use, the benefts of nicotine-free
generation policies clearly outweigh these challenges.
thir is not a radical idea. lt is a logical evolution in the
6ght against one of the mo5t powerful, proftable, and
preventable drivers of disease that humanity has ever
known. Now is the time to act. Let the next generation
beneft from the hard-earned lessons of the past. Let us
build a world whereyoung people never haveto say, "lwish
I had never started." Let us begin to build nicotine-free
generations, notju5t in name, but in reality.
wede(lar€ no (omp.lin9 intere5ts.
-Zochory c Rich, Motthew J Reynolds, Dione E stover
zachary.rich@bm<.org
Departm..tof Medicine, Eoston U.ive6ity kh@l of Medi(ine, Eoston, MA,
USA (zCR)i Hatuad MedkalS(hool, Botton, MA, USA (MJR); Eheritls Membe.,
Depaft ment of Medicine, Memon.l 5loan x€ttering Can@. Center, NewYork,
NY U5A (0ES)rProfetw Eme.ita. Cllnkalr$edkine at WeillConell M.dical
(ollege, NewYork, NY USA (0ES)
76 wwthelancet..omhespnatory vol 14 lanuary 2026