The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTyco Report of Inspection 2012Yp*n*nn 61n-z )97ttlco l{{:,f,,,, Sitnple.xGrinnell REPORT OF INSPECTION BUILDING / LOCATION United Parcel Service INSPECTOR Josh Hanna STREET CITY/STATE/ZIP ATTN: 130 Ansel Hallet Road DArE 9117t2012 Yarmouth. MA 02062 1. GENERAL A. (To be answercd by the Owner or Ownefs represedative) a. Have there been any changG in the occupancy chssification, machinery or operations since the lasl inspection? b. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the lasl insp€c{bn? c lf a fire has occuned since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkl€tr slBtem cornpon€r{s been replaced? d. Has the piping in all dry s)6terns b€en checked for proper ditch within the past live years? Date last checked N/A (checking is recommended at least every 5 years) e. Has the piping in all systems been ch€cked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 1t5n012 (checkino is recommended at least every 5 years) f Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flo\ l meters v/ithin the past 12 months? O Are Oravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from free2ino? h. Are any of the sprinkhr 50 years old or olden (bsting and/or replacement is recommended for suc.t| sprinklers) i. Are any extra hlgh tompeEture solder sp{inl4ers .egutady €xpc€d to te.np€tafur€6 n@r gOF? B. (To be an$/ered by ttle inspector) s- H6ve the sprinkler slrstems been extended to all visible areas of the building? b. Does there appear to be prop€r cl€arance bet$rcen lhe top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? c. Are the building areas protected by t r4,et sFiem, heaH, including its blind afics rnd peairyrctlr ar?as, lvtl€€ lcc6sibh? d. Are all visible exterior openings protected against the entrance of cold aiA 2. CONTROL VALVES a. Are all spdnlder sydern main cootrol \alves and all dler valv6 in the appropriate open or clced pcition? b. Are all control vdlves sealed ot sup€Msed in the open position? NA NOYES x x x x x x x x ,x x x x x IIIIIII IIIIIII IIIII III III II III x x Supervision Operatbnal Easily Accessible Siqns Valve Open vEs NONOi,LB Nrd (S€al€d?) (Lod(ed?) Control Valves #of Valves Type YES YES NO YES XXXXLCKSPVCITY CONNECTION 3 X TANK SECTIONAL XXSPVXXxxSYSTEM2 x XxXXALARM LINE 2 BALL IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII EEII -I II 3. WATER SUPPLIES a Water supply sources? City: Yarnoulh GEvity Tank N/A Waterflow Test Resutts Made During This lnspection ,t. TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE OEPT. COltlNECTlOt{S a. Do fire pump6, gravity, surtace oa Pressure tanks app@r to be in good external cohditims? Pressure Fire Pump & T"nk I4__ Pressure Fire Pump & City NA Pressure Fire Pump & Pond I4__ b. Are gravity, surface and pressure tanks at the proper pt6sure c. Are Rre dept. connections in satisfactory coflditbos, ccuplings and/or water levels? Flo., Pressure Static Pressure Aner Size Test Pipe Static Pressure Before Pressure Static Pressure Ater Test Pipe Located Srze Test Pipe Static Pressure Before Test Pipe Located 676860[,lain Drain (r)z' 676860rTv (r)1tz',-I II -I-I II-II- I II I II EI -I II - II - I - YES NA NO x X x xd. Are fire dept. connections visible and accGsible? lree, caF or plugs in phce and ch€ck valv6 tight? Secured? IF YES, IIOW? NO PIV/OSY SPV tqca SirnplexGrinnell REPORT OF INSPECTION 5. WET SYSTEMS a. No. ofsystems 2 6. ORY SYSTEMS a. No. of systems N/A Make & Model Make & Model MANIFOLD 6" CSC VALVES b- Are cold weather ralves in the appropriate opfi o. cloeed pcitbn? lf clo6ed, has piping been drained? c. Has the o.vner or o nefs reprEentalive been advised that cold weather valv6 are no( recofimeided by NFPA? d. Have allth€ antirreeze systems been t6ted? e. Date antifreeze systems were t6ted systeml _ 2_ 3_ 4_ 5 _temperatureg. Did alarm vafues, \./aterflow alarm indicators and retdrds test satlsfactorlly? Date last trip tested b ls the air pressure and priming water levels normal? c. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? d Were all low polnts dralned dufing thls hspectlon? e. Did all qujck opening devices operate satisfactonly? t. Did all the dry r€lves operate satistaclo.ily during this inspeotion? g. Do dry vatues appear to b€ protected from freezing? h ls the dry valve house heated? 7. SPECIAL SYSTEMS a No ofsyslems N/A Make & Model Type b. Were valves tested as required? c. Did all heat rGponsive systems operate satistac{oritf d. Did the superyisory teatur6 opeiate dlring testirE? Heat Responsive Devices: Type Valve No. Valve No. Valve No. Vatue No. Auxiliary equipment: 2...3...4...5 2...3...4...5 2.-.3...4...5 2...3...4...5 No. 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 6 6 Type of test Valve No. Vat'€ No. Vai/e No. Valve No. Type Location 8. ALARMS a. Oid the water motors and gong operAe durirE teslirE? b. Did the electric alarms operate during testi c. Did the supeMsory alarms operate during t6ting? 9. SPRINKLERS - PIPITIG a- Do sprinklctrs gcncrally aFpcar to ha in goad atcrrlal condition? b Oo sprinklers generally appear to be free of conosbn, paint, or loading and visible obstructions? c. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? d. Ooes the exterior condition ol pifing, drdin \.alves, check valves, hangers, pressure gauges, open sprinklers and strainers appear to be satisfactoM e. Does the hand ho6e on the sprinlder system appear to be in satisfactory condition? 10. EXPLANATION OF 'NO" ANSI TERS (For Sect ons lB lhru 9,: NOYESNA x x x x x IIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIII YES NO x x x x x IIIIIrII IIIIIIII YES NA NO x x III III rrrIII YES NA NO x x x YES NA NO x x x x IIITI IIII TAMPER SWITCH FOR WPIV ON SYSTEM #2 DID NOT REPORT TO FACP DURING TESTING NO COVERAGE UNDER CONVEYER BELT ALONG REAR OF BUILDING Fire & Security f. The antifreeze te6ts indicated protection to: Test results 5 5 5 NA x I I x ttlco l{{:,f,,, f simetexGrinnett 1I. THE INSPECTOR ST,GGESTS THE FOLLOWTAIG NECESSARY IiIPROVEMEMTS, }IOYYEVE& THESE AtrcG€AflONs ARE I{OT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEYT REPORT OF INSPECTION TROUBLESHOOT TAMPER SWITCH FOR WPIV ON SYSTEM f2 WHICH DID NOT REPORT TO FACP DURING TESTING EXTEND COVERAGE UNDER CONVEYOR BELT AT REAR OF BUILDING (APPROX 5 WIDE BY IOO LONG) PERFORMED FLOW TESTS 14. INSPECTION AND SUGGESTED IMPROVEME TS U'ERE DISCUSSED I'YITH THE UNDERSIGNED OTVIIER OR OVVNER'S REPRESEiITATTE? YES NO x Signature o[ owner or owne/s prepresentative Date 12. ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECIOI',E MADEI 13. LIST CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION ECIUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OI/\INER IN SECTION tA: